FCJ 4_human Rights

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    1/31

    Foundations of CriminalJustice

    LAWS 10421Lecture 5Human Rights

    Dr Hannah Quirk

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    2/31

    Outline of issues

    Introduction

    Rights at common law

    European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Act 1998

    Interaction of common law and ECHR

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    3/31

    Rights before the HRA

    UK has no written constitution

    Bill of Rights 1689 (An Act Declaring the Rightsand Liberties of the Subject and Settling the

    Succession of the Crown) has no special status Residual freedoms (can do anything not against

    the law)

    Did not protect individuals against the state

    Parliamentary supremacy, so nothing to preventActs that infringed an individuals rights

    Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    4/31

    Human Rights before the Human

    Rights Act 1998

    Wednesbury unreasonableness :it is so unreasonable that no

    reasonable authority could ever have come to

    it (Associated Provincial Picture Houses vWednesbury Corporation[1948] 1 KB 223,230, per Lord Greene MR)

    Shortcomings in domestic law e.g. right toprivacy Malone v UK(1984) 7 EHRR 14

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    5/31

    Council of Europe

    Established post WW2

    Signed in Rome 1950

    European Court of Human Rights

    Strasbourg

    States can claim against each other /individual claims against state

    47 members

    http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://image10.webshots.com/11/7/63/27/2839763270088267881gKSpUO_fs.jpg&imgrefurl=http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2839763270088267881gKSpUO&usg=__uIQXR6-XWDS5kLKN8kbhgHpYdFo=&h=1536&w=2048&sz=563&hl=en&start=15&um=1&tbnid=q37yrh3jlgzTLM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Deuropean%2Bcourt%2Bof%2Bhuman%2Brights%26hl%3Den%26um%3D1http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://image10.webshots.com/11/7/63/27/2839763270088267881gKSpUO_fs.jpg&imgrefurl=http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2839763270088267881gKSpUO&usg=__uIQXR6-XWDS5kLKN8kbhgHpYdFo=&h=1536&w=2048&sz=563&hl=en&start=15&um=1&tbnid=q37yrh3jlgzTLM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Deuropean%2Bcourt%2Bof%2Bhuman%2Brights%26hl%3Den%26um%3D1
  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    6/31

    European Court of Human Rights andECHR are separate from the EU and ECJ

    UK signed but did not incorporate

    Could not be enforced by domestic courts

    After 1966, individual could take case to

    ECtHR Expensive, lengthy, embarrassing for govt

    Labour manifesto 1997

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    7/31

    European Convention

    on Human Rights

    Art. 2 right to life*Art. 3 freedom from torture *Art. 4 freedom from slavery*Art. 5 right to libertyArt. 6 right to a fair trialArt. 7 bans retrospective criminal law*Art. 8 right to privacyArt. 9 freedom of thought/conscience/religion

    Art. 10 freedom of expressionArt. 11 freedom of associationArt.14 prohibition of discrimination

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    8/31

    Derogation

    Opt-outs (Art 15) in time of war or otherpublic emergency threatening the life ofthe nation

    Internment in Northern Ireland

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    9/31

    Margin of Appreciation

    the degree of latitude which signatoryStates are permitted in their observance ofthe convention (T. Jones The Devaluation

    of Human Rights under the EuropeanConvention [1995] Public Law430)

    Important where no European consensus

    e.g. pornography, abortion

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    10/31

    Proportionality

    Is the legislative objective sufficientlyimportant to justify limiting a fundamentalright

    Are the measures designed rationallyconnected to it

    Are the means no more than is necessaryto accomplish the objective?

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    11/31

    Without right to life, all other rights areirrelevant.

    Broad generic statement that then

    establishes limitations. Not simply a negative right preventing the

    State from killing people. includes unintentional killing.

    imposes positive duties on States topreserve life and to investigate deaths.

    Article 2: Everyone's right to life shall

    be protected by law.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    12/31

    Those in custody

    Keenan v UK(2001) persons in custodyare in a vulnerable position and that theauthorities are under a duty to protectthem

    Paul & Audrey Edwards v UK (2002)son murdered by cell mate withschizophrenia

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    13/31

    Undertake effective investigations into

    killings

    Article 2 + Article 1 (to secure rightsand freedoms in the Convention)

    requires by implication that there

    should be some form of effectiveofficial investigation when individualshave been killed as a result of the useof force by, inter alia, agents of theState. (Ergi v Turkey (2001) 32EHRR 13)

    http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://members.memlane.com/gromboug/noose.gif&imgrefurl=http://members.memlane.com/gromboug/P15MvFur.htm&usg=__6SLK5ImOzN7yeWa7MgsYtGcaGmw=&h=1500&w=305&sz=13&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=vtDyUl7NcDRjeM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=31&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dnoose%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    14/31

    Death Penalty

    Optional Protocol 6 to the ECHRabolishes the death penalty apartfrom certain acts during war, or

    where war is imminent. Optional Protocol 13 removes war

    exception

    http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://members.memlane.com/gromboug/noose.gif&imgrefurl=http://members.memlane.com/gromboug/P15MvFur.htm&usg=__6SLK5ImOzN7yeWa7MgsYtGcaGmw=&h=1500&w=305&sz=13&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=vtDyUl7NcDRjeM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=31&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dnoose%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    15/31

    Article 3

    No one shall be subjected to torture or toinhuman or degrading treatment orpunishment.

    Article 3 is an absolute right in allcircumstances. No limitations within the

    Article and no derogations under Article 15

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    16/31

    Ireland v UK(1978) 2 EHRR 25

    5 techniques (hooding, wall standing,white noise, sleep deprivation, food

    and drink) ECHR found did not constitute torture.

    Bar has been lowered since.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    17/31

    Extradition or deportation

    the activities of the individual in question,however undesirable or dangerous, cannotbe a material consideration. (Chahal v UK,

    1996 D v UK(1997) 24 EHRR 423HIV+

    death penalty does not necessarily breach

    Art. 3 but: death row syndrome may(Soering v UK, 1989)

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    18/31

    defines circumstances where it maybe curtailed

    essential conditions to control power can be derogated from in

    national emergency

    Article 5: The Right to Liberty and the

    Security of the Person

    http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://photos.jasonahite.com/images/A_5/7/1/1/11175/Statue_of_Liberty__BW_2_.jpg&imgrefurl=http://jasonahite.com/&usg=__DO_T1xuFvrj5kBViiZEp777iUYQ=&h=2304&w=1728&sz=383&hl=en&start=21&um=1&tbnid=QHgErgl18zO_kM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=112&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522statue%2Bof%2Bliberty%2522%26start%3D20%26imgsz%3Dhuge%26ndsp%3D20%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN
  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    19/31

    Article 5(2) Must be informed promptly, in

    language S understands, of reasons forarrest and any charges.

    Article 5(3) brought promptly before ajudge and entitled to trial within areasonable time, or release pending trial.

    Article 5(4) - entitled to take proceedingsby which the lawfulness of detention shallbe decided speedily by a court and releaseordered if detention is not lawful.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    20/31

    Article 6 Right to a Fair Trial

    1.

    In the determination of his civil rights andobligations or of any criminal charge againsthim, everyone is entitled to a fair and publichearing within a reasonable time by an

    independent and impartial tribunalestablished by law. Judgement shall bepronounced publicly by the press...

    2. Everyone charged with a criminal offenceshall be presumed innocent until provedguilty according to law.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    21/31

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence

    has the following minimum rights:

    (a) to be informed promptly, in language which heunderstands and in detail, the nature and cause ofthe accusation;

    (b) adequate time and facilities to prepare defence;

    (c) to defend himself in person or through legalassistance of his own choosing or, given free ifcannot pay;

    (d) to examine witnesses against him and to obtain theattendance and examination of witnesses on hisbehalf under the same conditions as witnessesagainst him;

    (e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    22/31

    Article 14

    The enjoyment of the rights and freedomsset forth in this Convention shall besecured without discrimination on any

    ground such as sex, race, colour,language, religion, political or otheropinion, national or social origin,

    association with a national minority,property, birth or other status.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    23/31

    Human Rights Act 1998

    s. 2- courts and tribunals are to takeinto account ECHR jurisprudence

    whenever [it] was made or given, so faras, in the opinion of the court or tribunal,

    it is relevant to the proceedings in whichthat question has arisen.

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    24/31

    s. 3-So far as it is possible to do so,primary legislation and subordinatelegislation, must be read and given effect in

    a way which is compatible with Conventionrights

    s. 6 - it is unlawful for a public authority toact in a way which is incompatible with aConvention right

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    25/31

    S 19 Ministers have to certify Act is inaccordance with HRA

    NB judges cannot strike down

    Declaration of incompatibility

    Fast-track procedure to remedy

    Commission for Equality and HumanRights

    Power given to judiciary

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    26/31

    Vertical effect (citizens can take actionagainst state)

    Limited horizontal effect (Douglas v Hello!

    Ltd[2001] 2 WLR 992) R (on the app of Al-Skeini) v Secretary of

    State for Defence[2007] UKHL 26

    applies beyond physical boundaries of UK Does not have retroactive effect (R v

    Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; [2002] 2 AC

    545)

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    27/31

    Remedies

    Court has discretion to grant such relief orremedy, or to make such order, within itspowers as it considers just and

    appropriate

    E.g. damages, declaration, quashing/mandatory / prohibiting order

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    28/31

    R v Ministry of Defence, ex p Smith[1995] 4 All ER

    Ban on gays in armed forces foroperational effectiveness was notunreasonable

    Smith and Grady v UK [2000] 29 EHRR 493

    Violation of Article 8

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    29/31

    Benefits

    Quicker

    Cheaper

    More effective remedies Ensures domestic and ECHR compatibility

    Reputation

    Educative effect

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    30/31

    Backlash

    Judicial law making (too much / notenough)

    Conservative party opposes HRA,favouring British Bill of Rights

  • 8/11/2019 FCJ 4_human Rights

    31/31

    Conclusion

    Importance of human rights

    Speaks to key themes of:

    relationship between citizen and state

    Balance of power between judiciary,legislature and executive

    Peculiar status of British constitution

    Importance of law and legal system