7/30/2019 FC Uniqueness

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fc-uniqueness 1/2

Glenoak UniquenessThey’re close to a deal but Republicans will make it a fight

 Voice of America, Today (VOA News, 12/7/12, http://www.voanews.com/content/fiscal-cliff-talks-stall-in-

 washington/1560639.html)

"The sense was that there's a growing number of folks in our party that are saying, 'You know what, the president has won this round

relative to the rates, but we need to you to sit down and get the second half of the deal and that's the spending,'" LaTourette said. GOP

senator backs tax rate hike on wealthy  It remains unclear if a deal will happen before the end of the year -- less than four weeks away -- or if the

negotiations will carry over into 2013 after the fiscal cliff of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts takes effect. While economists warn that going over

the fiscal cliff could lead to a recession, the administration has signaled it can delay some of the impacts to allow time to work out a deal. All signs point

toward a two-step approach sought by the newly re-elected Obama -- an initial agreement that would extend lower tax rates for income up to $250,000

for families, while letting rates return to higher levels from the Clinton era on income above that threshold. Even conservatives such as Oklahoma Sen.

Tom Coburn and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal acknowledge the obvious -- taxes on the wealthy are going up despite opposition by Republicans.

" Whatever deal is reached is going to contain elements that are detrimental to our economy,"

Jindal wrote Thursday in an opinion piece published by Politico. "Elections have consequences, and the country is going

to feel those consequences soon." Decisions Americans are already making over fiscal cliff At the same time, Jindal wrote,

"Republicans certainly should fight to at least get something done that will matter ." "At present, any 

reading of the headlines over the past week indicates that Republicans are fighting to protect the rich and cut benefits for seniors," he added. "It may be

possible to have worse political positioning than that, but I'm not sure how." Coburn, a notorious fiscal hawk, told MSNBC on Wednesday that he would

support higher tax rates on wealthier Americans as part of a broader deal to avoid the fiscal cliff and broader deficit crisis. "I know we have toraise revenue," Coburn said. "I don't really care which way we do it. Actually, I would rather see rates

go up than do it the other way,  because it gives us a greater chance to reform the tax code and broaden the base in the future." After meeting with his conference Wednesday, Boehner told reporters

that the rich will be paying more, but he still hoped to limit any increase to ending tax deductions and loopholes rather than Obama's demand for higher rates. "We have got to cut spending and I believe it is appropriate to put revenues on the

table," Boehner said. "Now, the revenues that we are putting on the table are going to come from guess who? The rich." Fiscal cliff could bring paycheck panic He continued, "There are ways to limit deductions, close loopholes and have the same

people pay more of their money to the federal government without raising tax rates, which we believe will harm our economy." Obama, however, continued to insist that Republicans must agree to higher tax rates for the wealthiest Americans

 before working out a broader agreement on tackling the nation's chronic federal deficits and debt. Under his plan, 98% of the country would have current rates extended, with higher rates affecting only 2% of top earners, the president and

Democrats note. "I'm not going to sign any package that somehow prevents the tax rate from going up for folks in the top 2%," Obama said Thursday at a campaign-style visit with a Virginia family to discuss the tax issue. The statements reflected

how negotiations on the the fiscal cliff have evolved since last month's election, when Obama won a second term and Democrats made gains in both chambers of Congress. Republicans opposed to any new revenue in their quest to shrink 

government now realize Obama's victory and pu blic support for the president's campaign theme of higher taxes on the wealthy leave them with little negotiating leverage. A new poll Thursday was the third in recent days to indicate most

 Americans accepted raising taxes on incomes over $250,000 as part of a fiscal cliff deal. The Quinnipiac University national survey showed 65% of registered voters support higher taxes on the wealthy, though Republican respondents were

opposed,53% to 41%. Also, a Washington Post/Pew Research Center survey released Tuesday showed 53% of respondents would blame Republicans for failure to reach a deal, compared with 27% who wou ld blame Obama. A CNN/ORC

International poll released last week showed 45% would blame congressional Republicans compared with 34% who would hold Obama responsible. Read more: The road to fiscal cliff paved with good intentions Despite the public stance softenin

of some Republicans in each house, signs point to a continuing standoff for now. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell warned Thursday that his party will continue to use the federal debt-ceiling issue as leverage to extract concessions on

spending cuts from Democrats, a tactic that Obama opposes. "The only way we ever cut spending around here is by using the debate over the debt limit to do it," McConnell said in response to Obama's call for removing the issue from political

negotiation. At the White House, spokesman Jay Carney said such brinksmanship over a matter involving a possible unprecedented government default was opposed by the business community and the American public. "I can't imagine they 

 would want to do that," he said of Republicans. The House is scheduled to adjourn for the year on December 14, but Boehner's number two, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, said Wednesday the chamber would remain in session until a fiscal cliff 

deal gets reached. Boehner, meanwhile, challenged Obama to talk, saying, "I'll be here and I'll be available at any moment to sit down with the president to get serious about solving this problem." Obama demands that the House immediately 

pass a measure already approved by the Senate to extend tax cu ts from 2001 and 2003 on income up to $250,000 for families. He contends that both Democrats and Republicans agree that the 98% of American families making less than

$250,000 a year should avoid a tax hike when the lower rates from the Bush administration expire on December 31. They call for the House to guarantee that outcome by passing the Senate measure n ow. Once that happens, Obama and

Democratic leaders promise, they will work out compromises on other spending cuts sought by Republicans to reduce the deficit, such as reforms to the Medicare and Medicaid entitlement programs. The latest proposal from House Republicans

could reduce federal deficits by $2.2 trillion over 10 years, GOP leaders say. The GOP proposal includes $800 billion from tax reform, $600 billion from Medicare reforms and other health savings and $600 billion in other spending cuts, House

Republican leadership aides said. It also pledges $200 billion in savings by revising the consumer price index, a measure of inflation. While the Republicans gave ground by calling for more revenue through tax reform, the plan mentioned only 

unspecified elimination of some deductions and loopholes. Opinion: Millionaires' tax bracket would be a smart compromise Obama's broader deficit reduction plan calls for deficit reduction of about $500 billion over 10 years by limiting itemized

tax deductions and other benefits for high-income earners. The 28% limit on deductions would apply to families earning more than $250,000 and individuals making more than $200,000, according to the White House. Jason Furman, an

assistant to Obama on economic policy, told reporters Wednesday that the president wants to ensure additional revenue from higher taxes on the wealthy now to help avoid the fiscal cliff. " What we're seeking

to do is to lock in revenue this year, not have some vague process that may or may not add up to

something, you know, in the future, and so we're trying to pass something this month," Furman said. While the

 White House has made clear Obama will veto any measure that fails to increase tax rates on the wealthy, aides

have signaled a possible willingness to negotiate the specific rate increase. In an interview with

Bloomberg TV this week, Obama said lower tax rates for the wealthy could be negotiated as part of 

 broader tax reform in 2013,  but only after those rates increase now. Obama's deficit-reduction plan would increase taxes by almost $1

7/30/2019 FC Uniqueness

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fc-uniqueness 2/2

trillion over 10 years, a significant portion of a $4 trillion overall deficit-reduction goal. It also would close loopholes, limit deductions, raise the estate

tax rate to 2009 levels and increases tax rates on capital gains and dividends. The Obama plan includes $50 billion in stimulus spending for programs

intended to create jobs, such as repairing roads and bridges. Experts have said failing to reach a fiscal cliff deal and devise a framework for a broader

deficit reduction package to be negotiated when the new Congress is seated in January would cause economic turmoil. The non-partisan Tax Policy 

Center estimates that middle-class families would pay about $2,000 a year more in taxes without action.