Upload
paula-daniels
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fathers’ work-family conflict: analysis of European Social Survey data
Svetlana Speight & Sara ConnollyMargaret O’Brien, Eloise Poole, Matthew Aldrich
July 2014, ESRC Research Methods Festival, Oxford
Note: The findings in this presentation are preliminary – please do not quote without authors’ permission
Outline• About the study• Theoretical background• Data, measures & hypotheses• Findings• Discussion
The findings in this presentation are preliminary – please do not quote without authors’ permission
About the study• Part of a larger study Fathers, Work and
Families in Twenty-first Century Britain: Beyond the Breadwinner Model?
• Funded by the ESRC as part of SDAI Phase 1• Collaboration between NatCen, UEA and TCRU
Policy and research context
• Work-family policy development: main focus on women and mothers, but…
• Acceleration of father-targeted policies since mid-1990s
• ‘Fatherhood regimes’ emerging– Fatherhood rights and obligations regulated by
policy (e.g. paternity leave and pay)– Promotion of a participative father
Wider context• Employment and working conditions
– Intensification, flexibilisation, increase in job insecurity, economic crisis
• Female/maternal employment rates• Gender roles at home
– Housework and childcare• ‘The incomplete revolution’ (Esping-
Andersen, 2009)
The new ‘male mystique’From Aumann K, Galinsky E & Matos K, 2011:
Theoretical background
Concepts
• Work-to-family conflict (WFC)• Family-to-work conflict (FWC)• Work-life balance (WLB)
– Problems of definition and measurement
Theoretical background
• Role theory (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985)• Ecological systems theory• Demands and resources approach (Voydanoff,
2005)• The stress of higher status hypothesis (Schieman
et al. 2006, 2009)
Societal-level factors
• Type of production regime– Coordinated v liberal market economy– Labour rights standards
• Welfare regime: support for dual earner/dual carer model– ‘time to care’ and ‘time to work’ policies (Lewis, 2012): leave
policies, flexible working, formal childcare provision– Support for father care
• Gender culture / gender system– Gender division of labour (paid and unpaid), power relations,
cultural definitions of gender roles, informal childcare practices• Post-2008 economic crisis
Data, measures & hypotheses
Data• European Social Survey
– Round 2 (2004-2005)– Round 5 (2010-2011)
• UK, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain, Greece, Poland
• Fathers only: less affected by the selection effect than mothers• Fathers in paid work, aged 20-64, in couples, with children aged
0-18• Sample size: about 1,500 per survey year in total
Work-to-family conflict• 2004 & 2010
– Worrying about work problems when not working– Feeling too tired after work to enjoy the things you
would like to do at home– Job prevents you from giving the time you want to
your partner and family– Partner or family gets fed up with the pressure of your
job
Scale: from ‘Never’ to ‘Always’ (5-point scale)
WFC score• Factor score (principal component analysis)• Mean value is 0, SD is 1• Higher values = higher WFC• Cronbach’s alpha = 0.73
Family-to-work conflict• 2004 & 2010
– Difficult to concentrate on work because of family responsibilities
• 2010 only– Family responsibilities prevent you from giving
the time you should to your job
Scale: from ‘Never’ to ‘Always’ (5-point scale)
Explanatory variables – paid work
– Working hours– Unsocial hours (weekends, evenings and
unpredictable overtime)– Occupational class (ISCO88 major groups)– Employee v self-employed
Explanatory variables – family circumstances
– Number of children – Age of the youngest child – Partner’s employment status / working hours– Partner working unsocial hours– Housework– Household income (subjective)
Explanatory variables – gender-role attitudes
• Composite measure of egalitarianism in gender-role attitudes:– A woman should be prepared to cut down on
her paid work for the sake of her family– When jobs are scarce, men should have more
right to a job than women(5-point agree/disagree scale)
Control variables
• Age• Education (years)
Hypotheses (work)
• Longer working hours -> higher WFC• Unsocial hours -> higher WFC • Occupational class: higher-status jobs (e.g.
managers, professionals) -> higher WFC • Self-employed -> lower WFC as more flexibility
and autonomy
Hypotheses (family)
• More children -> higher FWC/WFC• Younger children -> higher FWC/WFC• Partner not working or working part-time ->
lower FWC/WFC• Partner working unsocial hours -> higher
FWC/WFC• More housework -> higher WFC/FWC
Hypotheses (boundary spanning)
• More egalitarian gender-role attitudes -> higher pressure to ‘do it all’ -> higher FWC
• Low household income -> higher WFC/FWC
WFC v FWC
• Work-related variables will be more strongly associated with WFC, and family-related variables will be more strongly associated with FWC
Hypotheses (cross-national comparisons)
• Coordinated market economies / high labour rights standards (Sweden, Germany, Netherlands, France) -> lower WFC, liberal market economies (UK, Poland) -> higher WFC
• Better provision of formal childcare, lower cost of childcare (Sweden) -> lower FWC/WFC
• Informal childcare is common (Greece, NL) -> lower FWC/WFC• Higher father-care sensitivity in policy regime (Sweden) ->
lower WFC/FWC• More traditional gender cultures (Greece, Poland) -> lower
FWC, more egalitarian (Sweden, UK) -> higher FWC
Hypotheses (time trends 2004-2010)
• WFC increasing• FWC staying the same
Findings(work in progress)
WFC score, by country and year
- 0 .3 - 0 .3- 0 .2 - 0 .2 - 0 .1
0 .0 0 .1 0 .1
- 0 .2
0 .4
0 .0
0 .0 0 .00 .2 0 .1
0 .2
- 1 .0
- 0 .5
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
N eth erla nd s G reece S p a in S w ed en F ra n ce G erm a n y P o la n d U K
2004 2010B a s e: F a th ers a g ed 20 - 64 , in co u p les , in p a id w o rk a n d w ith ch ild ren a g ed 0 - 18
Difficult to concentrate on work because of family, by country and year (%)
17 19 2124 26 26
3 2
4 2
1519
28
1622
10
263 2
0
10
20
3 0
4 0
50
6 0
F ranc e S w ed en G reec e N etherland s G ermany S p a in P o land U K
2004 2010B a s e: F a th ers a g ed 20 - 64 , in co u p les , in p a id w o rk a n d w ith ch ild ren a g ed 0 - 18
Family responsibilities prevent you from giving the time you should to your job, by
country (%)
20 2224
3 1 3 2 3 2 3 43 8
0
10
20
3 0
4 0
50
S p a in N etherland s F ranc e S w ed en G ermany G reec e P o land U K
B as e: F athers ag ed 20- 6 4, in c oup les , in p aid w ork and w ith c hild ren ag ed 0- 18 (2010)
WFC: linear regression (work and socio-demographics)
Pooled 2004 2010 Coef. P>t Coef. P>t Coef. P>t Age 0.05 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.91 Age squared -0.001 0.01 -0.001 0.00 -0.000 0.65 Years of education 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.12 Log working hours 0.56 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.43 0.00 Ref.: Managers Professionals -0.08 0.23 -0.21 0.02 0.04 0.62 Technicians and assoc professionals -0.13 0.04 -0.21 0.02 -0.07 0.45 Clerical support workers -0.23 0.01 -0.38 0.00 -0.11 0.36 Services and sales workers -0.19 0.02 -0.25 0.03 -0.15 0.18 Skilled agric. workers -0.40 0.00 -0.33 0.01 -0.50 0.00 Craft and related trades workers -0.14 0.04 -0.29 0.00 -0.01 0.95 Plant and machine operators -0.31 0.00 -0.46 0.00 -0.19 0.07 Elementary occupations -0.35 0.00 -0.57 0.00 -0.17 0.21 Ref.: employee Self-employed 0.11 0.03 0.07 0.36 0.12 0.09 Unsocial hours (index) 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.24 0.00
WFC: linear regression (family factors and gender-role attitudes)
Pooled 2004 2010 Coef. P>t Coef. P>t Coef. P>t Ref.: 1 child 2 kids 0.06 0.14 0.04 0.46 0.07 0.23 3+ kids 0.05 0.34 0.01 0.87 0.08 0.28 Ref.: youngest child 0-3 Youngest 4-5 0.05 0.43 -0.02 0.84 0.09 0.28 Youngest 6-11 0.02 0.70 -0.06 0.40 0.09 0.20 Youngest 12-14 -0.01 0.84 -0.08 0.46 0.02 0.85 Youngest 15-18 0.03 0.68 -0.13 0.24 0.18 0.10 Ref.: partner works FT Partner works PT 0.03 0.59 0.03 0.71 0.01 0.90 Partner works unknown hrs 0.10 0.55 0.04 0.87 0.20 0.36 Partner not in paid work 0.00 0.96 -0.04 0.58 0.01 0.83 Ref.: not difficult to live on income Difficult to live on income 0.38 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.45 0.00 Ref.: Low share of housework with partner Medium share of housework 0.02 0.72 0.06 0.36 -0.05 0.48 High share of housework -0.11 0.02 -0.13 0.05 -0.12 0.08 Gender-role egalitarianism (index) -0.04 0.08 -0.05 0.09 -0.04 0.23
WFC: linear regression (cross-national comparisons)
2004 2010 Coef. P>t Coef. P>t Ref.: UK Germany -0.10 0.34 -0.01 0.95 Spain -0.13 0.27 -0.13 0.17 France -0.05 0.71 0.00 0.98 Netherlands -0.37 0.00 -0.22 0.04 Greece -0.50 0.00 0.01 0.92 Poland -0.13 0.22 -0.11 0.28 Sweden -0.11 0.29 -0.03 0.79
Difficult to concentrate on work: binary logistic regression (pooled 2004+2010)
Pooled 2004 2010 OR P>t OR. P>t OR P>t Age 1.1 0.09 1.2 0.02 1.0 0.93 Age squared 0.999 0.07 0.998 0.02 1.0 0.89 Works unsocial hours (index) 1.3 0.00 1.3 0.00 1.2 0.01 Ref.: partner works FT Partner works PT 0.7 0.01 0.8 0.20 0.6 0.05 Partner works unknown hrs 2.1 0.07 1.2 0.78 4.1 0.02 Partner not in paid work 1.3 0.11 1.4 0.15 1.3 0.38 Ref.: partner doesn’t work unsocial hrs Partner works unsocial hours 1.5 0.01 1.5 0.06 1.4 0.10 Ref.: not difficult to live on income Difficult to live on income 1.6 0.00 1.5 0.03 1.6 0.02 Gender-role egalitarianism (index) 0.9 0.03 0.8 0.01 1.0 0.61
Difficult to concentrate on work: cross-national comparisons
2004 2010 Odds ratios P>t Odds ratios P>t Ref.: UK Germany 0.4 0.00 0.7 0.10 Spain 0.5 0.00 0.2 0.00 France 0.3 0.00 0.4 0.01 Netherlands 0.5 0.01 0.5 0.04 Greece 0.2 0.00 0.8 0.45 Poland 0.6 0.08 0.6 0.06 Sweden 0.3 0.00 0.5 0.02
Family responsibilities prevent from giving time to job: ordered logistic regression (2010)
Odds ratios P>t Ref.: Managers Professionals 0.9 0.74 Technicians and assoc professionals 0.7 0.14 Clerical support workers 0.6 0.10 Services and sales workers 0.5 0.01 Skilled agricultural workers 0.4 0.01 Craft and related trades workers 0.6 0.01 Plant and machine operators 0.5 0.00 Elementary occupations 0.4 0.00 Unsocial hours (index) 1.2 0.00 Ref.: Low share of housework Medium share of housework 1.4 0.03 High share of housework 1.6 0.00 Ref.: Not difficult to live on income Difficult to live on income 1.6 0.01 Gender-role egalitarianism 0.9 0.04
Family responsibilities prevent from giving time to job: cross-national comparisons
Odds ratios P>t Ref.: UK Germany 0.7 0.16 Spain 0.4 0.00 France 0.4 0.00 Netherlands 0.7 0.08 Greece 0.6 0.08 Poland 0.8 0.44 Sweden 0.9 0.50
Discussion
Discussion: hypotheses• Hypotheses supported by data:
– working hours (WFC), unsocial hours (fathers and partners, WFC/FWC), occupational class (WFC/FWC), financial insecurity (WFC/FWC), housework (FWC)
• Hypotheses not supported by data – no association:
– number of children, age of the youngest child, (partner’s employment status)
• Hypotheses not supported by data – association in an opposite direction:
– self-employment (WFC), gender-role attitudes (WFC/FWC), housework (WFC)
• Work-related v family-related variables, WFC v FWC
• Trends over time
Discussion: cross-national comparisons
• UK - the highest WFC and FWC
• Netherlands – the lowest WFC but not FWC
• France and Spain – the lowest FWC
• Greece – the most dramatic change between 2004 and 2010, both WFC & FWC going up
Thank youDr Svetlana Speight (NatCen Social Research) –
[email protected]. Margaret O’Brien (TCRU, IoE) – [email protected] Sara Connolly (UEA) – [email protected] Poole (NatCen) – [email protected] Dr Matt Aldrich (UEA) – [email protected]
Appendix
Worrying about work problems when not working
1520
34
24
7
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2004+2010)
Feeling too tired after work to enjoy the things you would like to do at home
9
19
43
25
4
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2004+2010)
Job prevents you from giving the time you want to your partner or family
12
19
37
26
5
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2004+2010)
Partner or family gets feds up with the pressure of your job
2629
33
10
1
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2004+2010)
Difficult to concentrate on work because of family responsibilities
38 39
20
3 0
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2004+2010)
Family responsibilities prevent you from giving the time you should to your job
36 35
23
61
Never Hardly ever Sometimes Often Always
Base: Fathers aged 20-64, in couples, in paid work and with children aged 0-18 (2010)