Upload
rachelle
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Oral O3-07: Therapeutics and Therapeutic Strategies S513
10 weeks). Learning and memory were tested in the Morris water maze.
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) response evoked by whisker stimulation was
monitored by laser Doppler flowmetry. Vasomotor responses were evaluated
on isolated pressurized segments of middle cerebral artery using online vid-
eomicroscopy. Amyloid plaques burden and tissue levels of Ab were mea-
sured using Thioflavin-S staining, anti-Ab immunolabelling and ELISA.
Results:B1r appeared increased in APPmice, particularly in the hippocam-
pus, where double immunostaining showed its expression by activated astro-
cytes (GFAP), but not microglia (CD11b), surrounding Ab deposits.
Learning and memory were significantly improved after 5 and 10 weeks
of SSR240612 treatment. These treatments also ameliorated evoked CBF
responses. Both treatments completely rescued dilations to acetylcholine.
In treated wild-type (WT) mice, however, contractions induced by endothe-
lin-1 and NO synthesis inhibition were significantly reduced compared to
untreated WT. BK elicited a biphasic response (contraction followed by
relaxation) in all groups, with a tendency to constrict and dilate more in
APP and treated WT mice, respectively. Finally, soluble Ab1-42 levels
andAb plaque load were significantly reduced in the brain of APPmice after
both treatments.Conclusions: Together, these data support a role of the kal-
likrein-kinin system in the pathogenesis of AD, and suggest that it may rep-
resent a new therapeutic target.
O3-07-03 ALZHEIMER DISEASE COOPERATIVE STUDY
(ADCS) HOME BASED ASSESSMENT: DESIGNING
TRIALS WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY
Mary Sano1, Susan Egelko1, Steven Ferris2, Jeffrey Kaye3, Tamara Hayes4,
James Mundt5, Tracy Reyes5, Michael Donohue6, Chung-Kai Sun7,
Danielle Whitehair8, Karen Stokes8, Paul Aisen8, 1Mount Sindi School of
Medicine, New York, N.Y., United States; 2New York University, New York,
N.Y., United States; 3Oregon Health & Science University, Portland,
Oregon, United States; 4OHSU, Porltand, Oregon, United States;5HealthCare Technology System, Madison, Wisconsin, United States;6UCSD, La Jolla, California, United States; 7UCSD/ADCS, LaJolla,
California, United States; 8ADCS/UCSD, La Jolla, California, United
States.
Background: Clinical trials of prevention of dementia may be enhanced by
developing novel in-homemethods of assessment. The HomeBased Assess-
ment (HBA) study, a multicenter clinical trial, recruited elders randomized
to one of 3 in-home technologies for assessment. Herewe describe study im-
plementation and cohort baseline characteristics. Methods: Non-demented
individuals> 75 years old were recruited and evaluated by in-person assess-
ment, using established cognitive and functional clinical trial outcomes. Par-
ticipants were randomized to one of 3 HBA experimental methodologies:
1) mail-in questionnaire/ live telephone interviews (MIP); 2) automated
telephone with interactive voice recognition (IVR); and 3) internet-based
home Kiosk (KIO). Brief versions of cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes,
as well as assessment of adverse events, were adapted to the 3 methodolo-
gies and administered at baseline and repeatedly over a 4-year period.
“Efficiency” measures were collected to quantify staff resources required
for each methodology. 27 ADCS sites participated. Site staff attended
a 2-day training meeting. In addition to standard coordinating center sup-
port, daily (12 hrs/day) telephone support was available for KIO operations.
Participants were recruited primarily from community locations. Results:
678 individuals signed consent over 21-months; 640 were randomized.
Demographic characteristics were: mean age 81.3 (4.3); years of education
15.6 (2.9); 32% male; and 22% minority (Hispanic or Non-white). Mean
MMSE was 28.8 (1.2) and 20% were categorized as MCI by in-person
assessment. 59 participants discontinued prior to the baseline evaluation
and there were no differences in age, education, gender or screening
MMSE scores compared to those who continued to participate. The dropout
rate after randomization and the time from screening to baselinewere signif-
icantly different among groups (p< .001) with the highest dropout and lon-
gest time to complete baseline associated with the KIO. Training time
(minutes) also differed (p < .001): MIP 25.4 (15.2); IVR 38.5 (20.5); KIO
77.9 (60.9). Additional analyses will compare methodologies on other effi-
ciencymeasures, accuracy of self-reported adverse events and comparability
of performance on brief outcomes to in-person assessments across arms.
Conclusions: This report demonstrates the feasibility of recruiting an
elderly cohort for assessment in their own homes and enumerates resources
needed to complete the enrolment process.
O3-07-04 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE SURVIVAL IN
ALZHEIMER’S PATIENTS
Susan Rountree1, Wenyaw Chan2, Valory Pavlik1, Eveleen Darby1,
Rachelle Doody1, 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United
States; 2University of Texas Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Background: Treatment with antidementia drugs (cholinesterase inhibitors
and/or memantine) is efficacious but there is concern that use of these drugs
could prolong survival without improving quality of life. This longitudinal
naturalistic studyexaminedmultiple factors that influence survival in a cohort
of Alzheimer’s patients followed over two decades.Methods: Time to death
after symptom onset was determined in 641 probable AD patients estimated
by a physician using a standardized algorithm. Patients were evaluated an-
nually and information was prospectively entered into a longitudinal data-
base. Survival analysis was performed. Baseline variables included age,
sex, race, disease severity, preprogression rate (PPR), years of education,
and medical comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coro-
nary disease, cerebrovascular disease). We also utilized a time-dependent
mechanism to assess the impact of changes in the Mini-mental Status
Exam (MMSE), Physical Self Maintenance Scale (PSMS), Persistency In-
dex (PI) or cumulative exposure to antipsychotic and antidementia drugs,
and psychotic symptoms (hallucinations, delusions) on time to death. Re-
sults: The mean (SD) follow-up time after baseline visit to censoring or death
was 9.3 (3.51) years. Median survival time following the onset of symptoms
was 11.3 (CI: 10.4-11.8) years with 352 deaths. Baseline covariates signifi-
cantly associatedwith increased survivalwere younger age (p¼.0016), female
sex (p¼.0001), and a slower PPR (p< .0001) (an easily calculated estimate of
how fast a patient declines cognitively following the onset of symptomswhich
we previously published). In the final model, time-dependent worsening of
functional ability on the PSMS was also significant (hazard ratio¼ 1.1; CI:
1.07-1.11). Baseline disease severity, vascular risk factors and years of educa-
tion did not influence time to death. Time-dependent changes in anti-psychotic
druguse, development of psychotic symptoms, antidementia drug use, and ob-
servedMMSE changewere not predictive.Conclusions: In this large AD co-
hort survival is influenced by age, sex, the calculated rate or trajectory of
cognitive decline before enrollment, and the development of functional dis-
ability during follow-up. Currently available antidementia drugs provide cog-
nitive and functional benefit when use is persistent, but they do not influence
overall survival in Alzheimer’s patients.
O3-07-05 LONG-TERM EFFECTS OFAMULTICOMPONENT
COGNITIVE INTERVENTION IN AMNESTICMILD
COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT (AMCI)
Verena Buschert1, Ina Giegling1, Wibke Merensky1, Sabrina Jolk1,
Stefan Teipel2, Harald Hampel3, Dan Rujescu1, Katharina Buerger1,1Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit€at M€unchen, Munich, Germany;2University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany; 3Goethe University, Frankfurt,
Germany.
Background: Recent studies and a current randomized controlled trial on
a mutlicomponent cognitive intervention program demonstrated benefits
through cognitive intervention in subjects with mild cognitive impairment
(MCI). However, few studies determined long-term effects with extended
follow-up periods. Moreover, intervention effects on conversion rate of
MCI-subjects into AD are largely unexplored. Methods: In a randomised
controlled trial, we evaluated effects of a 6-month multicomponent cogni-
tive intervention on subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment
(aMCI) with follow-up assessments of 12 and 24 months. Main outcome
measures were changes in global cognitive functions (Mini Mental Status
Examination, MMSE, and Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale, ADAS-
cog), secondary outcome measures were changes in specific cognitive and
non-cognitive functions and conversion into AD. Results: Twenty-four
subjects with amnestic MCI were randomly assigned to intervention