Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Network Care Coordination Workshop
Facilitative Leadership Workbook
600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 │ Duluth, Minnesota 55802
218-727-9390 │ www.ruralcenter.org/rhi/network-ta
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 1
WHAT IS FACILITATIVE LEADERSHIP?
● Assumes that the group has knowledge and wisdom
● Knows ‘how-to” methods
● Seeks decisions the group will own and implement
● Relies on the group’s ability to inspire action
Focused Conversation Intro
Objectives:
● An inquiry process and facilitation technique
● Builds on the creativity and capability of the group
● Helps a group move from a shallow sharing of
information to a deeper exchange of ideas and to
actions
Values:
Inclusive participation
Supporting collaboration and creativity
Seeking action and ownership
Incorporating reflection and learning
Impact:
● Provide meaningful dialogue
● Broaden a group’s perspective
● Elicit clear ideas and conclusions
● Allow an entire group to participate
Common Applications:
● Collect data and ideas from a group or team
● Discuss tough issues
● Reflect on important events or issues
● Focus multiple stakeholders on a particular topic or
issue
● Explore levels of consensus or shared understanding
● Move any discussion to productive conclusion
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 2
Focused Conversation Method Structure
OBJECTIVE
REFLECTIVE
INTERPRETIVE
DECISIONAL
People walk in; take
things in with their
senses.
Begin to sense, like, don't
like, emotions & feelings
stir, associations are
made, memories rise to
the surface
Make conscious
connections, thoughts
arise, words, ideas form,
understanding, we think
about what's going on
Consider actions,
decisions, choices, what
to do, how to respond,
how to relate
SHALL I VOLUTEER? I
THINK I'M GOING
TO…LET'S GET TO THE
BOTTOM OF THIS. SO,
WHAT I LEARNED FROM
THIS IS…HERE'S MY
PLAN… THIS IS NOT FOR
ME!! I THINK THERE IS A
SOL-UTION TO THIS
PROBLEM. PERHAPS I
So then,
my idea
is…
O
R
I
D
What
Data
Actions Now
What
Considering So
What
Feeling
Gut
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 3
Description and Example Focus Conversation Design worksheet:
Topic Question: Determine the overall focus of the conversation making sure to tie it to specific data and diagnosis.
“How might facilitative leadership be an effective approach for a care coordination environment? “
Rational Aim: Identify the intent or practical goal of the
conversation, i.e. what do you want the group to know, learn,
discover, explore, or decide?
Identify groups insights on facilitative leadership as an
effective approach for care coordination environments
Experiential Aim: Identify the impact of the conversation on the group
itself i.e. how do you want the participants to experience the conversation?
Group is encouraged to participate in the training and comfortable
interacting with their colleagues.
Opening: Welcome the participants to the conversation and set the context, i.e. tell them the topic, why you are having the conversation,
what is the rational aim. Provide them with any specific data that they will need for the conversation.
Welcome to this facilitative leadership session where we will consider several techniques or methods of working with groups to support the
care coordination efforts that are taking place in your communities. Let’s start off by talking more how facilitative leadership might be an
effective approach for a care coordination environment.
Objective
What/Data
Reflective
Gut/Response
Interpretive
So What/Thinking
Decisional
Now What / Action
● Of the four aspects of
facilitative leadership, which one stands out for you?
● Where have you had
experience where facilitative leadership was the approach being used by the leader?
● How would you compare
the approach of facilitative leadership with other leadership approaches?
● Which aspects of facilitative
leadership align with your efforts as network leaders?
Closing: Provide a closing that clarifies the decisional level of the conversation and any next steps.
Thanks for participating in our conversation to kick-off our session on facilitative leadership.
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 4
Practice Conversation 1
Creating Ground Rules for a Participative Meeting Situation: A new care coordination team is forming
with people from different organizations. They want to create guidelines for participation.
Rational Aim:
To create out of the groups experience guidelines for their participation in this new team
Experiential Aim:
Increase confidence that their meeting times will be productive and reasonably non-stressful.
Opening: We are going to create guidelines for participation in our new care coordination work team so that when we meet our work will be productive and reasonably stress-free. To start off I want you to think of a real
participatory situation you have been in; it may have been successful or not successful.
Objective
If we were at that meeting you are recalling, what would we ‘see’ going on? What words might we hear?
What might we notice about the participant’s body language?
Reflective
In that meeting what as the best part of the meeting?
What was the worst part? At the end of the meeting, what was the mood?
Interpretive
What kind of behavior made the participation work? Or not work? What is behind that behavior?... why was this?
What have we been hearing and learning about participation that helps people participate? Or hinders people from participating?
Decisional
From what we have heard and learned; what is a clear guideline for participation? What might be another obvious guideline?
A not so obvious guideline?
What other’s that we haven’t mentioned yet?
Closing: Thank you for your suggestions. I will summarize and bring back to our next meeting where we can fine-tune and finalize as ground rules for going forward in our care coordination work team together.
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 5
Practice Conversation 2
Focusing a Group before a Larger Discussion Situation: community is experiencing an increase in drug
related emergency room visits over the past 6 months and the hospital is pulling together a community group to
address or find solutions.
Rational Aim:
To get everyone’s mind in the same arena by discussing the origin and roots of a specific
situation.
Experiential Aim:
To focus the whole group on the context and conversation in preparation for the larger discussion
Opening: We have decided to take the time together to look at this significant situation in our community and
decide what it will take to make progress on a decision. But let us first take a few minutes to focus
together on how the situation developed and review what brought us to this point.
Objective What are some of the events that led up to this situation? What else do we know about the background of this situation?
Reflective What has been the most frustrating part of this? How has this situation impacted us personally?
How has this situation impacted our work?
Interpretive If this situation continues to develop without any further discussion, what are the possible
ramifications for our organization or our community?
Decisional How would we prioritize these effects as critical to consider for the larger discussion that
we will move into next.
Closing: Thank you for your input. This conversation was to focus our attention and begin to identify possible
ramifications of the situation. Let us now begin to discuss the larger question “What are some actions we can take together to address this situation?”
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 6
EXAMPLE Questions for a Focus Conversation
Objective
What/Data
Reflective
Gut/Feelings
Interpretive
So What/Consider
Decisional
Now What / Action
● What is one word (scene,
activity, face, fact, event, data point, thing you saw,
heard, or smelled) that you recall?
● What is one piece of data
around this issue that you know?
● What is the first thing you think of when I say “____”?
● What headline caught your
attention this week?
● What is coming up for us
this week that needs to be on the calendar?
● What is one area that needs funding this year?
● What is something that
happened in our community since our last meeting?
● What does this remind you
of?
● What past experience does
this make you think of?
● How does this make you feel?
● Where were you surprised? Annoyed?
● What was inspiring? A struggle?
● What was really easy?
Difficult?
● What is exciting? What
concerns you?
● What is an image that
comes to mind? I
● What is happening here?
● What is this all about?
● What does this mean for
us?
● What do you think is behind this?
● How will this affect our work?
● What are we learning from this?
● What insights are
emerging so far?
● What values do we want to
consider to make this decision?
● What is the significance of our work?
● What decision is being
called for?
● What are our next steps?
● Let’s prioritize these ideas.
● What about our project has changed because of today?
● What recommendations have we agreed on today?
● What will change for you because of this session?
● What would you change for
next time?
● How shall we document and
celebrate our work?
● What are we committed to
doing or accomplishing?
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 7
Focused Conversation Worksheet: Template 1
Topic Question:
Rational Aim: Experiential Aim:
Opening:
Objective
What/Data
Reflective
Gut/Feelings
Interpretive
So What/Consider
Decisional
Now What / Action
● ● ● ●
Closing:
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 8
Focused Conversation Worksheet: Template 2
Topic: Rational Aim:
Experiential Aim:
Opening:
Objective
Reflective
Interpretive
Decisional
Closing:
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 9
ACTIVE LISTENING GUIDELINES:
● Ask open-ended questions
● Minimize disruptions – pay attention
● Paraphrase - seek clarification
● Reflect speaker’s feelings – show that you are listening
● Defer judgement – listening does not include talking
Active Listening Practice
Working in pairs here are two scenarios to choose from and each of you will take a role: 1) question asker and 2)
responder. Spend a minute or two talking about the scenario to prep for the role play conversation. Spend 5-7
minutes talking within your roles and then switch roles. When you are in the role of Question-Asker, practice using
active listening guidelines.
Scenario 1: Network Director is seeking input
from a member organization leader on the work
the member organization is trying to do and how
the network can support that work.
Scenario 2: Network Director is talking with a community
member about the current health and wellness in their
community and concerns or successes that are taking
place.
O: What is an activity or effort that your
organization is currently working on?
R: How does this activity excite you or make
you worried or concerned?
I: how does this activity impact the organization
as a whole?
D: How would you say that the network can
support this activity or your organization as it
relates to this activity?
O: What is a recent event or happening in your
community related to health or wellness?
R: How does this event or happening make you feel?
I: how is this event or happening a sign or beacon of
other health or wellness issues in the community?
D: what are some of your hopes for or suggestions to
improve the health and wellness of the community?
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 10
“The important thing is to never stop questioning.”
--Albert Einstein
APPLICATION OF FACILITATIVE LEADERSHIP SKILLS:
Where in your care coordination efforts is there an opportunity to apply a focused conversation or active listening
guidelines?
Created by Rural Health Innovations (RHI), Network Technical Assistance Team for August 2015 Care Coordination Workshop Adapted from © Institute of Cultural Affairs, 1980-2013.: Technology of Participation (ToP) Focused Conversation Page 11
A MINI BIBLIOGRAPHY:
The Art of Focused Conversation: 100 Ways to Access Group Wisdom, General Editor: R. Brian Stanfield, The
Canadian Institute of Cultural Affairs
Books, facilitator supplies (sticky wall), and facilitation training are available through the ICA-USA website www.ica-
usa.org
Who developed the Focused Conversation method?
The Institute of Cultural Affairs (ICA) is a unique facilitation, training and research organization, providing effective participatory
skills to thousands of people across the United States and 36 other nations. With over 40 years of international experience, the
ICA continues to be on the leading edge of change in designing, delivering and training people to use simple, yet highly
productive group leadership processes. In the United States, ICA’s Technology of Participation (ToP)® programs and methods
are used by hundreds of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, government agencies, professional associations and local
communities. Copyright on the page or the following copyright notice must appear on all reproductions: © Institute of Cultural
Affairs, 1980-2013.
Who is the Institute of Cultural Affairs? (ICA)
The Institute of Cultural Affairs in the USA (ICA) is a global social change organization registered since 1973 as a 501 (c)(3) not-
for-profit corporation in the State of Illinois. ICA’s mission is to build just and equitable societies in harmony with planet earth.
ICA’s website (www.ica-usa.org) has more details on the broad range of our programs, partnerships and services around the
country. Currently, there are ICA's in thirty-six countries around the world.
ICA’s early background is in neighborhood and community development. One of the key learnings from this community
development experience is that sustainable success of local community and organizational development efforts is the capacity to
facilitate active, effective and ongoing participation of all involved in the design, planning, implementation, benefits and the
evaluation / transition of the project. This became the impetus for the creation of the Technology of Participation (ToP)®
Today, ICA's Technology of Participation (ToP) ® methods are one of the leading forces shaping the emerging professional field
of facilitation around the world.