Upload
yasushi
View
218
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
REVIEW ARTICLE WCN 2013 Satellite Symposium ‘‘Kidney and Lipids’’
Fabry disease: experience of screening dialysis patients for Fabrydisease
Eiji Kusano • Osamu Saito • Tetsu Akimoto •
Yasushi Asano
Received: 25 September 2013 / Accepted: 18 October 2013
� Japanese Society of Nephrology 2013
Abstract The prevalence rate for Fabry disease is con-
ventionally considered to be 1 case in 40,000; however, due
to increased screening accuracy, reports now suggest that
prevalence is 1 case in 1,500 among male children, and it is
likely that the clinical importance of the condition will
increase in the future. In dialysis patients to date, prevalence
rates are between 0.16 and 1.2 %. Globotriaosylsphingosine
(Lyso-GL-3), which is a substrate of a-galactosidase A (a-
Gal A), has surfaced as a new biomarker, and is also effective
in the determination and monitoring of the effects of enzyme
replacement therapy. In terms of genetic abnormalities, the
E66Q mutation has recently become a topic of discussion,
and although doubts have been expressed over whether or not
it is the gene responsible for Fabry disease, there is still a
strong possibility that it is a functional genetic polymor-
phism. At present, the standard treatment for Fabry disease is
enzyme replacement therapy, and in order to overcome the
problems involved with this, a method of producing
recombinant human a-Gal A using methanol-assimilating
yeast, and chemical or medicinal chaperone treatment are of
current interest. Migalastat hydrochloride is known as a
pharmacological chaperone, but is currently in Phase III
global clinical trials. Adding saposin B to modified a-N-
acetyl galactosaminidase is also under consideration as a
treatment method.
Keywords Fabry disease � Dialysis patients �Screening � a-Galactosidase A � Lyso-GL-3 �E66Q mutation � Enzyme replacement therapy �Chemical chaperone treatment
Introduction
Fabry disease is a form of lysosomal disease, in which the
activity of hydrolase a-galactosidase A (a-Gal A), which
exists within lysosomes, either falls or is deficit, with the
result that the glycolipid conversion of globotriosylcera-
mide (GL-3) to lactosylceramide (GL-2) is impeded. GL-3
then accumulates in various organs and cells throughout
the body, giving rise to a range of disorders over a period
of several decades. The condition is an X-linked recessive,
extremely rare condition, but is frequently the cause of
stroke, renal failure and heart attack in young people. Since
the condition has a major negative impact on a patient’s
quality of life, early detection and treatment are vital. Since
2004, a-Gal enzyme replacement therapy has been offered
under Japanese health insurance, offering the possibility of
early detection and thereby avoiding the dangers of death
from renal failure, heart attacks and strokes.
Fabry disease subtype
The condition known as Fabry disease was first reported by
the British and German dermatologists, Anderson and
E. Kusano (&)
Utsunomiya Social Insurance Hospital, 11-17, Minami
Takasago, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 321-0143, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
E. Kusano
Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
O. Saito � T. Akimoto
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical
University, Shimotsuke, Japan
Y. Asano
Koga Red Cross Hospital, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke,
Japan
123
Clin Exp Nephrol
DOI 10.1007/s10157-013-0897-2
Fabry, in 1898. They noted the characteristic dermatolog-
ical observations that we now associate with Fabry disease,
along with angiokeratoma corporis, in patients.
The genes that encode a-Gal A are present in the X chro-
mosome long arm Xq121.33-q22, meaning that Fabry disease
has an X-linked recessive, and that severe symptoms occur in
male hemizygote patients. Patients with Fabry disease have
deficient a-Gal A activity in white blood cells, blood serum,
urine and organ tissue throughout the body, while carriers
demonstrate intermediate values. This reduction in enzyme
activity results in GL-3 and other glycolipid substrates accu-
mulating in tissue and organs, causing symptoms in the skin,
eyes, digestive organs, heart and kidneys, as well as psycho-
logical and neurological symptoms.
Not all Fabry disease patients demonstrate the same
clinical symptoms, however, and clinical presentation can
be broadly divided into ‘classical’, ‘cardiac-variant’ and
‘renal-variant’. Classical type demonstrates the classical
symptoms of Fabry disease, beginning with pain in the four
limbs during early school years, and progressing to hypo-
hidrosis, angiokeratoma, corneal clouding and other
symptoms. With increasing age, the patient may suffer end-
stage kidney disease (ESKD), ischemic heart disease and
cerebrovascular disorders, and many patients die of these
conditions. With renal-variant, symptoms are not noted
throughout the body; the main attribute of the condition is
ESKD. There are some, although not many, dialysis
patients who have renal Fabry disease in addition to clas-
sical Fabry disease, and there is the possibility that some
may be undergoing dialysis for undiagnosed reasons.
Cardiac variant is similar to renal variant, with symptoms
not noted throughout the body as they are with classical
type, but from middle age onwards patients tend to suffer
mainly from cardiac disorders, most commonly hypertro-
phic cardiomyopathy. The mechanisms by which subtypes
other than classical type occur are extremely interesting; it
has been conjectured to date that mutations without par-
ticular impact on a-Gal A activity, in other words E66Q
and other mutations play a role, although this has not been
clarified [1].
Fabry disease prevalence rate and screening
The prevalence rate for Fabry disease is conventionally
considered to be 1 case in 40,000; however, a report of
recent screening of newborns now suggests the prevalence
to be 1 case in 3,100 [2]. Furthermore, screening of male
children has led to a report that prevalence is 1 case in
1,500 [3]. Improvements in screening accuracy are thought
to be facilitating the diagnosis of this disease. The fre-
quency of the condition is higher than was previously
believed, and in the future the clinical importance of the
condition is likely to rise.
The targets of screening for Fabry disease have been
newborns, patients who have suffered early-onset stroke,
patients undergoing dialysis for ESKD, and patients
developing left ventricular hypertrophy at a young age,
among others (Fig. 1). Ascertaining Fabry disease is easi-
est, in order, among patients suffering early-onset stroke,
patients with unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy,
dialysis patients and newborns (Table 1). While screening
of patients with cardiac hypertrophy and stroke patients
delivers a high rate of positive results, implementing this
on a nationwide level is problematic. The positive rate in
screening newborns is low, and follow-up is difficult. Other
problems include the psychological stress under which this
places parents.
From screening of dialysis patients to date, we have
found that between 0.16 and 1.2 % have Fabry disease, and
there may be more cases of latent Fabry disease (renal
variant) among patients with ESKD, presenting no classical
symptoms, than was previously imagined. According to a
statistical survey carried out by the Japanese Society for
Dialysis Therapy, of approximately 295,000 dialysis
patients in Japan at the end of 2011, only 0.1 % (289 cases)
had congenital metabolic disorders, including Fabry dis-
ease, while at the same time 8.3 % (24,417 cases) were
classified as having an unknown primary disease [4].
Against this background, the authors began to imple-
ment the nationwide epidemiological study into Fabry
disease referred to as Japan Fabry disease screening study
(J-FAST), focusing on dialysis patients. We screened 8,547
dialysis patients (male 5,408, female 3,139), among whom
we found 25 patients (11 male and 14 female, 0.3 %) who
gave a positive result in the third test. Of the 25 patients, 11
did not accept genetic analysis. The remaining 14 patients
agreed to genetic analysis, which revealed that 3 patients (2
male, 1 female had a variation of the a-Gal gene and 7
patients showed E669 variations (4 male, 3 female), and 4
patients (2 male, 3 female) had no variations denying Fabry
disease. The prevalence rate of both male and female
dialysis patients (3 patients) with Fabry disease in this
study was 0.04 % (male 0.04 %, female 0.03 %) other than
those with the E66Q mutation. These results in fact dem-
onstrated a lower prevalence rate for both sexes compared
with other reports to date. A major potential factor in this
was considered to be that screening to date might have
included the E66Q mutation, which has been frequently
studied in Japan. In addition, since 11 of 25 patients did not
receive genetic analysis, there may be some patients with a
variation of the a-Gal gene and E66Q mutation. Therefore,
taking this into account could explain the lower prevalence
rate in J-FAST.
Clin Exp Nephrol
123
Diagnosis of Fabry disease
Generally, a confirmed diagnosis of Fabry disease can be
achieved either by histopathologically demonstrating the
accumulation of substances in the organs, biochemically
demonstrating a reduction in activity in blood a-Gal A or
abnormal elimination of GL-3 in urine, or genetically
demonstrating the genetic mutation of a-Gal A. Diagnosis
is usually performed by measuring a-Gal A activity in
blood serum, and if it is low, measuring white blood cell
activity, and if this is reduced, implementing genetic test-
ing. Alternatively, since the a-Gal A substrate glob-
otriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-GL-3) also accumulates
similarly to GL-3, a high level may indicate Fabry disease.
Lyso-GL-3 is an effective new biomarker for Fabry disease
[5]. Furthermore, it is effective in determining the effec-
tiveness and monitoring of enzyme replacement therapy
[6].
Fabry disease demonstrates an X chromosome genetic
form, with the result that its symptoms are severe in
hemizygote males, but in females, who are heterozygotes,
its symptoms can range from none through to a similar
level of severity to hemizygotes.
The problem of E66Q mutation
Around 600 different genetic abnormalities have so far
been reported, but recently the E66Q mutation, which has
been found more frequently than suspected in Japan and
Korea, is a particular problem. Attention is focused on
whether or not it is a causative gene for Fabry disease,
since a-Gal A activity is lower than among healthy people,
or alternatively, whether it is a functional genetic poly-
morphism. The Sakuraba group suspected that patients
with the E66Q mutation may have either renal or cardiac
variant delayed-onset Fabry disease, and in order to
investigate this they implemented biochemical, pathologi-
cal and structural research. As a result, they demonstrated
that causing the E66Q mutation in a-Gal A enzymes results
in slight changes to the formation of the surface of these
enzymes, and causes instability in the enzyme proteins.
Biochemically, however, a relatively high level of enzyme
activity was maintained in white blood cells, and GL-3 did
not accumulate in a cultured fibroblast. Even under elec-
tron microscopy, no zebra body was noted in skin tissue.
Given these facts, it was concluded that the E66Q mutation
is not a causative gene for Fabry disease, but rather a
functional genetic polymorphism [1, 6, 7].
Treatment
Anti-inflammatory analgesics have almost no effect on the
acroparesthesia in all four limbs at early stages of the
disease, but in many cases regular carbamazepine is
effective. Cardiac symptoms are treated with calcium
antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,
angiotensin receptor blockers or beta-blockers. Once
Fig. 1 Onset of signs and
symptoms in typical Fabry
disease
Table 1 Prevalence rates for Fabry disease in newborn infants,
patients on dialysis, patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and
patients with criptogenic stroke
Objects Prevalence rates for Fabry
disease (%)
Newborn infants 0.0025–0.032
Patients on dialysis 0.16–1.2
Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy 1.4–12
Patients with cryptogenic stroke 3.65
Clin Exp Nephrol
123
patients develop ESKD they are treated with dialysis and/
or renal transplantation. Thrombosis is treated with ticlo-
pidine or other antiplatelet drugs.
(a) Gene transfer
At present, gene therapy has been studied using a mouse
model of Fabry disease in which a-Gal A has been knocked
out. However, in experiments using retrovirus, adenovirus
and adeno-associated virus as vectors, in which a-Gal A
genes were introduced via bone-marrow cells, parenterally
or nasally, increased enzyme activity was noted in a range
of organs including the heart and kidneys, along with
reduced GL-3 concentration [8, 9]. In the future, this is
expected to have applications for Fabry disease patients.
(b) Enzyme replacement therapy
It has become possible to create a-Gal A through genetic
engineering methods, for use in treatment of Fabry disease,
and enzyme replacement therapy is becoming a more
standard treatment. In 2001, Eng et al. at Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, and Schiffmann et al. at the US
National Institute of Health had some success with regard
to Fabry disease with enzyme replacement therapy; how-
ever, although a small number of cases demonstrated an
allergic reaction, it was implemented comparatively stably
[10, 11]. The former transferred a-Gal A genes into Chi-
nese hamster ovary cells, while the latter produced a large
volume of enzymes using a gene activation method
involving human fibroblasts, which were used in clinical
trials. Since 2004, enzyme replacement therapy has been
covered by health insurance in Japan, and approximately
260 patients throughout the country are currently receiving
treatment, including dialysis patients.
Sakuraba et al. used methanol-assimilating yeast, which
allows the production of glycoproteins at low cost, to
produce modified human a-Gal A (yr-ha-Gal A). When yr-
ha-Gal A was administered singly to mice with Fabry
disease, a-Gal A activity in various organs increased, and
the increase in a-Gal A activity in the kidney was partic-
ularly notable. Furthermore, yr-ha-Gal A was multiply
administered and the effect on decomposition of GL-3 and
Lyso GL-3, accumulated in the various organs of the mice
with Fabry disease, was confirmed together with the
number of lamellar inclusions [12].
(c) Chemical chaperone treatment
Recently, chemical chaperone treatment using low-
molecular compounds have been attracting attention as a
new method of treating lysosome diseases such as Fabry
disease. This treatment method involves a low-molecular
compound such as a substrate analog, etc., bonding with
the active area of an a-Gal A mutant in a specified amino
acid displacement, correcting the abnormalities in the
enzyme folding, and stabilizing it.
In Fabry disease, 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin and ga-
lactostatin bisulfite, which are a-Gal A substrate analogs,
are known to be effective chaperones. These compounds,
however, are only effective on a-Gal A occurring in
specified amino acid displacements, and have the disad-
vantage of also acting as a-Gal A inhibitors [12, 13].
Recently, the low-molecular drug migalastat hydro-
chloride has also become known as a pharmacological
chaperone that can be administered orally. Pharmacologi-
cal chaperones have the potential to be effective in a wide
range of lysosome conditions, including Fabry disease. At
present, the drug is in Phase III global clinical trials to
confirm its efficacy and effectiveness with regard to Fabry
disease. [14].
(d) Modified a-N-acetyl galactosaminidase with saposin
B treatment
As a new treatment strategy, Sakuraba et al. [15] dis-
placed and modified two amino acids relating to substrate
recognition in a-N-acetyl galactosaminidase (NAGA),
which is similar in three-dimensional structure to a-Gal A.
The modified NAGA acquired the enzyme function of a-Gal
A, while having a greater stability than a-Gal A, and fur-
thermore, included large quantities of M6P, which is related
to absorption into cells. When the modified NAGA was
added to cultured fibroblasts originating from Fabry disease
patients, it was absorbed into the cells and decomposed the
accumulated glycolipids. Modified NAGA did not cause an
immune reaction with blood serum in Fabry disease patients
who demonstrated high antibody value in regard to a-Gal A.
In addition, Sakuraba et al. also developed a manufac-
turing method for saposin B, which strengthens glycolipid
decomposition in a-Gal A and modified NAGA cells.
Saposin B functions to cause encounters between hydro-
philic enzymes and hydrophobic substrates, and its simul-
taneous administration is expected to improve the
effectiveness of the enzyme drug.
Acknowledgments We received a research fund of Japan Kidney
Foundation. We really appreciate Ms Aiko Ooashi for her secretarial
assistance in conducting J-FAST and preparing this manuscript.
Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no Conflict of
interest exists.
References
1. Doi K, Noiri E, Ishizu T, Negishi K, Suzuki Y, Hamasaki Y, et al.
High-throughput screening identified disease-causing mutants
and functional variants of a-galactosidase A gene in Japanese
male hemodialysis patients. J Hum Genet. 2012;57:575–9.
Clin Exp Nephrol
123
2. Spada M, Pagliardini S, Yasuda M, Tukel T, Thiagarajan G,
Sakuraba H, et al. High incidence of later-onset fabry disease
revealed by newborn screening. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(1):
31–40.
3. Hwu WL, Chien YH, Lee NC, Chiang SC, Dobrovolny R, Huang
AC, et al. Newborn screening for Fabry disease in Taiwan reveals
a high incidence of the later-onset GLA mutation c.936 ?
919G [ A (IVS4 ? 919G [ A). Hum Mutat. 2009;30(10):
1397–405.
4. The state of chronic dialysis therapy in Japan (as of 31st
December 2010). J Jpn Soc Dial Ther 2012;45:1–47.
5. Auray-Blais C, Ntwari A, Clarke JT, Warnock DG, Oliveira JP,
Young SP, et al. How well does urinary lyso-Gb3 function as a
biomarker in Fabry disease? Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411
(23–24):1906–14.
6. Togawa T, Kodama T, Suzuki T, Sugawara K, Tsukimura T,
Ohashi T, et al. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine as a biomarker
of Fabry disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2010;100(3):257–61.
7. Kobayashi M, Ohashi T, Fukuda T, Yanagisawa T, Inomata T,
Nagaoka T, et al. No accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in
the heart of a patient with the E66Q mutation in the a-galacto-
sidase A gene. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;107:711–5.
8. Takenaka T, Murray GJ, Qin G, Quirk JM, Ohshima T, Qasba P,
et al. Long-term enzyme correction and lipid reduction in mul-
tiple organs of primary and secondary transplanted Fabry mice
receiving transduced bone marrow cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci
USA. 2000;97(13):7515–20.
9. Jung SC, Han IP, Limaye A, Xu R, Gelderman MP, Zerfas P,
et al. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated gene transfer
results in long-term enzymatic and functional correction in
multiple organs of Fabry mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
2001;98(5):2676–81.
10. Eng CM, Guffon N, Wilcox WR, Germain DP, Lee P, Waldek S,
et al. International collaborative Fabry disease study group.
Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase
A–replacement therapy in Fabry’s disease. N Engl J Med.
2001;345(1):9–16.
11. Schiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin HA 3rd, Sabnis S, Moore DF,
Weibel T, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a
randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2743–9.
12. Tsukimura T, Kawashima I, Togawa T, Kodama T, Suzuki T,
Watanabe T, et al. Efficient uptake of recombinant a-galactosi-
dase A produced with a gene-manipulated yeast by Fabry mice
kidneys. Mol Med. 2012;10(18):76–82.
13. Tsukimura T, Chiba Y, Ohno K, Saito S, Tajima Y, Sakuraba H.
Molecular mechanism for stabilization of a mutant a-galactosi-
dase A involving M51I amino acid substitution by imino sugars.
Mol Genet Metab. 2011;103(1):26–32.
14. http://www.amicustherapeutics.com/default.asp.
15. Tajima Y, Kawashima I, Tsukimura T, Sugawara K, Kuroda M,
Suzuki T, et al. Use of a modified alpha-N-acetylgalactosamini-
dase in the development of enzyme replacement therapy for Fa-
bry disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(5):569–80.
Clin Exp Nephrol
123