Ezra the Greek-flint

  • Upload
    enokman

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    1/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    2/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    3/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    4/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    5/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    6/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    7/25

    FAMILY FAMILY

    of marriage that chiefly prevailed in old Arabia. Th ehusband acquires his property by purchase. Them5hdr paid by the ancient Hebrews, as by the ancientArabs, and by the Syrian fellahin of the present day,on betrothal, is simply the purchase-money paid to theformer proprietor-the father or guardian (cp MAR-RIAGE, I). With the payment of this purchase-money the marriage becomes legally valid, and allrights over the bride pass to the purchaser.

    This is seen most clearly in the terms of the law relating tothe seduction of a betrothed virgin, that is, one who has alrcadybeen purchased by her future husband. Th e compensation tobe paid was fixed exactly on the same scale as for a marriedwoman (Dt. 22 233); looked at from the present point of viewit made no difference whether the marriage had been consum:mated or not ; the violation of the rights of private propertywas equally great in both cases.

    Originally, as Robertson Smith (Kin.,2 8 ) rightlyobserves, such a 6a'aZ marriage must have been amarriage by capture. Before a daughter of the tribecould be sold into such slavery, the slavery of womanmust have become fixed as a firmly rooted usage invirtue of the established fact that ordinarily wives wereobtained by plunder from abroad or as captives in war.Such women were of course, in the strictest sense, theproperty of the husband, the slaves of their master.We know that down to Mohammed's time marriage bycapture was extremely prevalent ; and, as was only tobe expected, we have clear traces that it was notunknown in ancient Israel. In this way, we are told,the Benjamites who had escaped extermination wereprovided with wives (Judg. 21). Here (the date of thenarrative is immaterial) capture in war (v . 108)standsalongside of capture (in peace) at the annual harvestfestival at Shiloh (v . 1 9 8 cp DANCE, It is safe toinfer that at the festival in question there survivedancient customs which owed their existence to areminiscence of marriage by capture in the strict senseof the word. Such customs belong to the samecategory as those found among the Arabs, which plainlyare designed, after the wife has ceased to be capturedreally, to represent the practice figuratively (see MAR-RIAGE, 3) . D, moreover (Dt.21,mj?), has specialregulations (whatever we may choose to make of them)as to the manner of entering into a valid marriage witha prisoner of war-regulations which certainly haverelation to an ancient custom. By the fact of becomingthe lawful married wife of her master, the captive

    woman passes into the ranks of the free women (as faras it is possible for any woman to be free ; see 4) ;she is no longer liable to be sold as a slave by hermaster ; if he divorces her she becomes free. The ruleof old Arabia was precisely similar. Obviously,however, a certain stigma attached to marriage bycapture as soon as it had been supplanted in generalusage by marriage (by purchase) with a tribeswoman.Laban reproaches Jacob for his stealthy flight on theground that he had carried off his daughters with himas if they had been captives taken in war (Gen.3126).

    Though the wife at marriage passes into the powerofher husband, her position is not otherwise changed-4, Legal at least for the worse-and accordingly

    The unmarriedwoman in the house of her parents, alsowoman' is under tutelage ; she is the property of

    her father or guardian. Amongst the Arabs, forexample, her guardian can make her his wife or marryher to his sou without having to pay any mfihci?: Inlike manner, to take another instance, two fathers canexchange daughters as wives for their sons.

    Th e seduction ofan unbetrothed virgin is from this point ofview regarded as an injury to property, and, very significantlyis dealt with by the law in that connection only. A virgin ikvalued at a higher figure than a widow or a divorcee. Th eseducer has to pay to the father, as compensation, the amonntofm8hltlrwhich the father would otherwise have been entitledto at her marriage (Ex.22 15 [16]). The father, however, is underno compulsion to give the girl in marriage to the seducer;otherwise the way to force a marriage would be only too plain.

    I499

    6).

    position of she feels no degradation.

    Such an encroachment on his rights h e is entitled to resist ; soalso in old Arabia.

    Whilst thus treated as a valuable chattel, woman wasnot originally at all regarded from the point of view ofworking efficiency. The ancient Semites never apprai sedher SO low. Women were looked upon rather aspotential mothers, destined to give the tribe the mostpriceless of all gifts-namely, sons. On the number of

    its spears depended in those primitive times the wholepower and dignity of clan and tribe. Therefore it wasthat the tribe did not willingly allow its women to passby marriage into another tribe so as to enrich it withchildren. Later, indeed, when a sedentary life hadbeen adopted, views changed and at the present timewhat the fellahin grudge is the working efficiency whichby marriage is transferred from their own to anotherfamily.

    The onesidedness of the marriage relation comes into5. Special prominence especially at three points :points. ( a )where there is polygamy, (6 )where there

    is divorce, an d (c) where there is inheritance.( a ) In a condition of society where the husband isregarded as owner of the wife, naturally no limit is setto his powers of acquisition. He can own as manywives as his means allow him to purchase and maintain.He can also acquire secondary wives and make hisfemale slaves his concubines at his pleasure. In this

    there is felt to be so little of reproach to the first legalwife that instances are not wanting in which sheherself promotes the arrangement (as in the cases ofSarah, Leah, and Rachel). The great antiquity ofthis custom (and thus also of the patriarchal system,see KINSHIP, 9) is shown by the fact that the word(22%)for a secondary wife is common to all the Semiticlanguages (see ADVERSARY).

    On the other hand the wife is very zealously guarded.Though she is hy no means shut up as in the Islam of to-daythe custom of veiling-which doubtless originated in the circldof ideas that we have been considering-is very ancient (Gen.24 65 20 25). Adultery is punished with death, and if thehusband has suspicions he can subject his wife to the ordeal of

    jealousy (Nu.5 11-30; see JEALOUSY, ORDEAL OF). Undersuch conditions the only case in which the husband can he guiltyofadultery is when he seduces the wife of another man. CpMARRIAGE, 4.

    (6 ) The right ofdivorce is equally onesided in favourof the man. It .is always in his power to forgo hisright s of property and to send his wife back to herhome, if only he is prepared at the same time to send

    back the mfihir. The wife, on the other hand, has nomeans of obtaining a separation from her husband, orof forcing a divorce.

    (c) Neither the unmarried nor the married woman iscapable of inheriting. In 6a'aZ marriages and underthe patriarchal system the tendency to limit women'spower of ownership and inheritance is easily intelligible.What belongs to the woman goes out of the family ather marriage. Thus in Israel daughters had no rightof inheriting along with sons (see LAW AND JUSTICE,18), and women's right of property was confined towhat they had received as a gift; the wife of goodposition retains at her marriage (for example) the rightto the female slaves who have been given to her as herpersonal attendants on leaving her father's house (Gem1 6 2 6 3049). Even these, however, in the last resort,rank as part of the husband's property disposable byinheritance. Numerous indications tend to show thatin ancient Israel when a man died his womenkindpassed to the heir in the same way as the rest of hisproperty (cp MARRIAGE. 8).

    Strictly, however, this right of property over thewife is not a right over her person : it is a right toenjoy her society and have children by her. Thehusband cannot, for example, sell his wife (though hecan sell his children) into slavery (Ex. 217). Hecannot sell even the concubine whom he Has bought asa slave, or gained as a prize of war. Thus , even froma purely legal point of view, the position of a woman

    1500

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    8/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    9/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    10/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    11/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    12/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    13/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    14/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    15/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    16/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    17/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    18/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    19/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    20/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    21/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    22/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    23/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    24/25

  • 8/9/2019 Ezra the Greek-flint

    25/25