16
Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships

Brian ColemanAngela Lutheran

April 19 2012

Page 2: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Survey Design

• Taken from Pew Internet surveys– Princeton University

• Maximal 55 questions*• Question Style– Yes or no– Likert scale– Dimensional analysis

Page 3: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Survey Participants

37%

41%

8%

7% 2%

3% 2%

Age Range

15-2021-2526-3031-3536-4041-4546-50

• Not Compensated• Anonymous honesty

Page 4: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Race

79

8 3 1

Caucasian

African American

Asian

Multiracial

By # out of 91 Total Participants

Page 5: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Gender Orientation Demographics

Page 6: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Extremes via Survey

Page 7: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012
Page 8: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Linking Research & our Participants

“Holds more weight with age”

Page 9: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Other Interesting Outlier

• Sexual Orientation & Exploration– Male– Prefers Men– Is married– Identifies as heterosexual– Somewhat agreed that some

people who use online dating lie about whether they are married

Page 10: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Correlation between Responses?

Ross M. (2005) found that even TRUST and INTIMACY are heightened when communicating online versus face to face.

Page 11: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Characteristics of the Sex Extreme

Page 12: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Consistent with Other Researchers

VS. Romantic seeker as examined in Bauermeister, Leslie-Santana, Johns, & Pingel’s (2010)

Page 13: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012
Page 14: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Strengths of Survey

Page 15: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Limitations of Survey

1. Large Sample Size2. Internal Validity for Constructs

3. Longitudinal comparison 4. Further information from outliers

LACKS:

Page 16: Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April 19 2012

Conclusion

• Our survey addressed not only extremes of online interpersonal relationships

• But also, contained outliers that have been backed by psychological literature

• As with every experiment, this study can be replicated and improved to produce stronger results and to gain new insight