22
Extending the Season for Concrete Construction and Repair Charles Korhonen U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) NESMEA Northeastern States Materials Engineers’ Association October 19-20, 2004, Portsmouth, NH Research Civil Engineer Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 72 Lyme Rd Hanover, NH 03755

Extending the Season for Concrete Construction and Repair · 2008-02-12 · Extending the Season for Concrete Construction and Repair Charles Korhonen ... Cost $/m3 Summer Antifreeze

  • Upload
    buicong

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Extending the Season for ConcreteConstruction and Repair

Charles Korhonen

U.S. Army Cold Regions Researchand Engineering Laboratory

(CRREL)

NESMEANortheastern States Materials Engineers’ Association

October 19-20, 2004, Portsmouth, NH

Research Civil EngineerCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory

72 Lyme RdHanover, NH 03755

Current Practice

Winter Concreting (review)

• Not changed since the 1930s• Thaw substrate• Pre-heat materials• Use insulation and heated enclosures

1990s

• Demonstrated antifreeze admixtures

• No acceptance standard for antifreeze admixtures. * Tort Liability * Market Size * Inertia

• No single commercial admixture significantly lowersthe freezing point of fresh concrete.

Problem

• Combine Off-the Shelf Admixtures

– Already Meet Standards

– Familiar & Available

– No Limit on the # of Admixtures

Solution

POOLED-FUND STUDY

FHWA TPF 5-(003)

Objective: develop

concrete that can fully cure

at below freezing

temperatures

Product: tools to design,mix, place, and cureconcrete in below-freezingweather

October 2000 – October 2003(ID, MI, MT, NH, NY, PA, UT, VT, WI, WY)

How Normal Concrete Performs

Time (min)Time (min)

–5C

40C

How Antifreeze Admixtures Work

• Depress the freezing point

• Accelerate the hydration rate of cement

20

10

0

-100 200 1000 1200 1400400 600 800

ControlMix 1

Tem

pera

ture

(C)

20

10

0

-10

20

10

0

-100 200 1000 1200 1400400 600 8000 200 1000 1200 1400400 600 800

ControlAntifreeze

Tem

pera

ture

Freeze Point

DaysDays0

8000

6000

4000

2000

7 28 56 84

Stre

ngth

psi

AntifreezeAntifreeze

ControlControl

20C 5C–5C

20C

0 56 84

Stre

ngth

psi

ControlControl

20C

“Antifreeze Concrete”

-5°C

Combine admixtures to:

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Completed Freeze-Thaw Cycles

Rel

ativ

e D

ynam

ic M

od

ulu

s o

f E

last

icit

y (%

)

fig 10 from TR-04-2

CONTROL

Admixtures do not reduceconcrete’s freeze-thaw durability

-

S1

0

100

200

300

400

500

In-p

lace

Co

st$/

m3

Su

mm

er

An

tifr

eeze W

inte

r

Year Round

120 Days

60 Days

• 1/3 less cost

• Extends the season

ANTIFREEZE ADMIXTURES: Cut Time & Cost

–5°C Capability

Field Tested

Littleton, NH 10 Dec ’01 Bridge Curbing

Rhinelander, WI 27 Feb ’02 Pavement

North Woodstock, NH 12 Dec ’02 Footing

West Lebanon, NH 18 Dec ’02 Bridge Curbing

Concord, NH 14 Feb ’03 Sidewalk

New York, NY 18 Feb ’04 Streets & Sidewalks

Grand Forks AFB, ND 23 Feb ’04 Airfield slab

FHWA Study

Others

CASE STUDY

–15°C

32m L x 46cm W x 38cm D

Bridge Curbing, W. Lebanon, NH 18 December 2002

10 a.m.

Preconstruction Trial Batches

First Trial Second Trial Job Mix

FP = -4.3ºC

Adjustments Needed:

• Workability * Cements Vary Widely * Batching Plant Setups Differ

• Zero in on freezing point * Agg. Moisture Varies• Optimize Batch Sequence * All at mixing plant * Some at plant, rest at job * All at job

FP = -4.7ºC FP = -5.1ºC

Ingredient

Cement

Aggregate

Sand

AEA

Type A

Cor. Inh.

Type E

W/C

Air Content

Slump

Amount

392 kg/m3

1083 kg/m3

804 kg/m3

77 ml/m3

584 ml/100kg

30 L/m3

5.87 L/100kg

0.37

8.0%

200mm

Ready-Mix PlantBATCHING

9:45 – 10:15 A.M.

3.5 m3

Type E dosed but not mixeduntil truck arrived at jobsite

10:40 – 10:10 A.M.

3.5 m3

First Load

Second Load

PLACING&

FINISHING

Traffic Control

10:15 A.M–12°C

CURING… but for how long?

10

15

20

25

500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900

Maturity (C-hrs)

Str

eng

th (

MP

a)

MaturityFast-Track

Measuring theFreezing Point• Quality Assurance

• Back-calculatewater/cement Ratio(Critical to Strength)

Is it good concrete?

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

Maturity (C-hr)

Str

en

gth

(M

Pa)

Cold Concrete\Final Report\Maturity Datum\TruesBrookRT12A_Maturity.xls\Strength (MPa) FR

Maturity Curve

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Age (days)

Esti

mate

d S

tren

gth

(M

Pa)

Cold Concrete\Field\RT12A\TruesBrookRT12A_Maturity.xls\cjk - psi #3

TOP

INTERFACE

Strength Development Curve

ActualPerformance

7 Days

Cost ComparisonTrues Brook, West Lebanon, NH

18 Dec ‘02

Erect Shelter: 96 mhrDismantle: 36 mhr

βHeat Shelter: 364 gal LPMaterials: 48 ea – 2x4x8

120 m – 1x8 pine120 m – strapping2 rolls – poly

βAdmixture #1 = $58.69/m3

βAdmixture #2 = $3.52/m3

βAdmixture #3 = $52.34/m3

Heat = $748.47 Admixtures = $700.64

… a chemical substitute for heat.

The ProductFHWA Pooled-Fund Study

TPF-5(003)

… developed an antifreeze technology that produces concretethat can fully cure while its internal temperature is belowfreezing, and that is as strong and durable as normal concretecured during the summer.

http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/concrete

What We Still Don’t Know

Phase I – Establishing the Technology “… demonstrated the practicality of antifreeze admixtures”

Phase II – Determining Engineering Parameters• Enhanced Durability• Thermal Safety• Quality Assurance Tools• Other Cements

SP&R Pooled-Fund Study TPF-5(075)

Extending the Season for Concrete Construction and Repair

Defining Engineering Parameters

Phase II Continuation of TPF-5(003)

US Army Cold RegionsUS Army Cold RegionsResearch and Engineering Research and Engineering LaboratoryLaboratory

US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineers ®of Engineers ®ERDCERDC

SP&R Pooled-Fund Study TPF-5(075)

Extending the Season for Concrete Construction and Repair

Defining Engineering Parameters

Phase II Continuation of TPF-5(003)

US Army Cold RegionsUS Army Cold RegionsResearch and Engineering Research and Engineering LaboratoryLaboratory

US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineers ®of Engineers ®ERDCERDC

US Army Cold RegionsUS Army Cold RegionsResearch and Engineering Research and Engineering LaboratoryLaboratory

US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineers ®of Engineers ®ERDCERDC

US Army CorpsUS Army Corpsof Engineers ®of Engineers ®ERDCERDC

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

F/T Cycles

Dyn

amic

Mo

du

lus

of

Ela

stci

ty

Control

Antifreeze

C:\mydocuments\from sherri\antifreeze durability\antifreeze concrete 0.xls

Objective: The freeze-thawdurability of concrete seems toimprove whenever high doses ofchemical admixtures are used. Thisneeds to be investigated.

Enhanced Freeze-Thaw Durability

Phase II:

US Army Corpsof Engineers

Engineer Research & Development CenterCold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory

Charles [email protected]

http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/concrete

Extending the Season for ConcreteConstruction and Repair