Upload
russell-jefferson
View
224
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Experiencing Interdisciplinary Research
Alan BlackwellReader in Interdisciplinary DesignUniversity of Cambridge
a policy agenda
• ‘ESRC expects to support new and exciting research which combines approaches from more than one discipline’– ESRC Impact, Innovation and Interdisciplinary
Expectations (January 2009)
• ‘The aim is to bring together participants from a wide range of disciplines to develop a fresh and innovative approach to research’– EPSRC Connect call for participants (May 2009)
an ‘industry’ agenda?
my background
• 19 years professional design experience(including design projects for London Underground, British Gas, Hitachi)
• 4 degrees (engineering, philosophy, comp sci, psychology)
• 30 products deployed
• I learned that dramatic innovations come from multi-disciplinary teams and perspectives ...
• ... but how do you do this in a University?
potential: students in Cambridge
Arts & Humanities
Humanities & Social Sciences
Technology
PhysicalSciences
BiologicalSciences
Clinical
potential: research in Cambridge
Arts & Humanities
Humanities & Social Sciences
“Created to encourage collaboration between technologists, and researchers in the arts, humanities and social sciences.”
strategy
Academic
Public sector
Commercial
a Crucible “house style”
• Start small and move fast
• Bring creative and design practices to technology
• Facilitate encounters between communities
• Cheerfully transgress academic borders
• Engage with reflective social science
• Directly address public policy
Interdisciplinary Innovation – strategic creation or self-organising success?
Studying interdisciplinary innovation
• Interdisciplinary team (psychology, economics, anthropology, engineering) taking a phenomenologically ‘bracketed’ stance
• Conduct snowball sample to find leaders and brokers
• Intensive workshops with practitioner witnesses
• Consider any boundaries as potential ‘disciplines’– complex problems cross organisational & policy
boundaries– planning for the future extends beyond current
knowledge
Expecting the unexpected
• Not just transferring or translating knowledge– building teams with different kinds of knowledge
• Disciplines predefine problems and goals– Innovative outcomes are necessarily unanticipated
• Achieving radical (not incremental) innovation– Investment in collaboration is fundamental– ‘Capital growth’ is capacity for future response– ‘Dividends’ arise serendipitously
Making interdisciplinary innovation happen
• Enablers– ‘Pole star’ leadership– Trust and generosity– Time to build social capital, change one’s mind– Allow, maintain and reward intellectual curiosity
• Obstacles– Disciplines are the base of career structures– Even new inter-disciplines become silos– Patents are restrictive
(value narratives are more generative)
Elements of interdisciplinary innovation
• Build ecologies, creative spaces, ‘theatres of thinking’
• The interdisciplinary enterprise– A team – committed and curious boundary-crossers– A leader – who mentors, maintains focus, and sells
the brand– A sponsor (which often requires goals)– Outcomes (which often require evaluation)
• Practitioners– Offer personal histories, not qualifications– Tend to have imprinted ‘native’ disciplinary styles– Benefit from stereotypically ‘feminine’ personal
skills