Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
_̂ §̈¦540
§̈¦87§̈¦40 §̈¦40§̈¦440
§̈¦440
§̈¦440
§̈¦540§̈¦540
§̈¦540
§̈¦40
§̈¦40
Beac
onAr
ms W
ay
Grandiflo raLn
ColumbusClub Dr
NNew
H ope Rd
Beaco
nVilla
geDr
Bullock Farm Rd
New Bern Ave
Wilde
r sGr
oveL
n
Parti
n Rd
Pin Oak Rd
Beacon Crest Way
Corp
orati
onPk
wy
Beacon Heights Dr
Lake Woodard Dr
Beacon Village Dr
Corp
orati
on Pk
wy
N NewHope Rd
Corporation Pkwy
Corporation Pkwy
R-6-CU
IX-3-PL
CX-3-PL
R-6-CU
CX-3
CX-3-PK-CU
IX-3-PL
R-10-CU
CX-3-PL-CU
IX-3-PL-CU
OX-3-CU
CX-3-PK-CU
IX-3-PK
IX-3
IX-3-PL
IX-3CX-3-PL
IH
R-10
R-10
IX-3-PL
IX-3
R-6
R-10-CU
CX-3-PK
R-10-CU
£¤64
£¤64
0 230 460 690 920Feet
Existing Zoning Z-13-2018
±32.82 acresCX-3, CX-3-PK, CX-3-PK-CUCX-3-PL-CU
0, 4121, & 4201 New Bern Ave; 1412 Corporation PkwyProperty
SizeExistingZoning
RequestedZoning
Location
Map by Raleigh Department of City Planning (littlek): 5/23/2018
1
Municipal Building 222 West Hargett Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
One Exchange Plaza 1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 1020 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
City of Raleigh Post Office Box 590 • Raleigh North Carolina 27602-0590 (Mailing Address)\
TO: Ruffin L. Hall, City Manager
FROM: Ken Bowers AICP, Director Matthew Klem, Planner II
COPY: City Clerk
DEPARTMENT: City Planning
DATE: December 20, 2018
SUBJECT: City Council agenda item for January 8, 2019 –
Rezoning Z-13-18
On November 6, 2018, City Council closed the public hearing for the following
item:
Z-13-18 New Bern Avenue and Corporation Parkway, north of New Bern Avenue and bounded by New Bern Avenue, Corporation Parkway, and New Hope Road, at 0, 411, 4201 New Bern Ave and 1412 Corporation Pkwy
Current Zoning: Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories (CX-3), Commercial Mixed
Use-3 stories-Parkway (CX-3-PK), and Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories-
Parkway-Conditional Use (CX-3-PK-CU)
Requested Zoning: Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories-Parking Limited-
Conditional Use (CX-3-PL-CU). Proposed zoning conditions regulate high
intensity uses, protect existing trees along New Bern Avenue and New Hope
Road, and the provide transit easements and amenities.
The request is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
The request is consistent with the Future Land Use Map.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the request (8-0).
The Northeast CAC voted in favor of the case (4-0).
Attached are the Planning Commission Certified Recommendation (including
Staff Report and Traffic Study Worksheet), the Zoning Conditions, the Petition
for Rezoning, and the Neighborhood Meeting Report.
CERTIFIED RECOMMENDATION Raleigh Planning Commission
CR#
CASE INFORMATION Z-13-18 NEW BERN AVE AND CORPORATION PKWY Location iMaps Google Driving Directions
Bound by New Bern Avenue, Corporation Parkway, and N. New Hope Road. Address: 0, 4121, 4201 New Bern Avenue and 1421 Corporation Parkway PIN: 1724960124, 1724868905, 1724868153 & 1724862746
Request Rezone property from CX-3, CX-3-PK, CX-3-PK-CU to CX-3-PL
Area of Request 32.82 acres Corporate Limits The subject site is within, and surrounded on all sides by, the
corporate limits of the City of Raleigh. Property Owner Joseph P. Riddle, Riddle Commercial Properties, Inc., and Wilders
Grove Inc. Applicant Michael Birch Citizens Advisory Council (CAC)
North East CAC Pam Adderly, Community Specialist 919-996-5716, [email protected]
PC Recommendation Deadline
December 11, 2018
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY The rezoning case is Consistent Inconsistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
FUTURE LAND USE MAP CONSISTENCY The rezoning case is Consistent Inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GUIDANCE FUTURE LAND USE Community Mixed Use
URBAN FORM Mixed Use Center, Transit Emphasis Corridor, Urban
Thoroughfare
CONSISTENT Policies Policy LU 1.2 Future Land Use and Zoning Consistency Policy LU 1.3 Conditional Use District Consistency Policy LU 2.6 Zoning and Infrastructure Impacts Policy LU 6.1 Composition of Mixed-Use Centers Policy LU 7.2 Shopping Center Reuse Policy H 1.8 Zoning for Housing Policy UD 1.10 Frontage
INCONSISTENT Policies Policy LU 7.5 High Impact Commercial Uses
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1. The following principal uses shall be prohibited: adult establishment.
PUBLIC MEETINGS Neighborhood
Meeting CAC Planning Commission City Council
3/28/2018 6 attendees
6/14/2018 9/13/2018
6/26/2018 8/14/2018 9/25/2018
10/2/2018
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The rezoning case is Consistent with the relevant policies in the Comprehensive Plan,
and Approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest.
The rezoning case is Consistent with the relevant policies in the comprehensive Plan,
but Denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest.
The rezoning is Inconsistent with the relevant policies in the Comprehensive Plan, and
Denial of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest.
The rezoning case is Inconsistent with the relevant policies in the Comprehensive Plan,
but Approval of the rezoning request is reasonable and in the public interest due to
changed circumstances as explained below. Approval of the rezoning request constitutes an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to the extent described below.
Reasonableness and
Public Interest
The request is reasonable and in the public interest because it
increases the city’s potential overall housing stock which will
help to moderate the costs of owning and renting by keeping the
market well supplied with a variety of housing types. Increasing
zoning entitlement will also better leverage the high level of
transit service currently available to the site.
Recommendation Approval
Motion and Vote Motion: Alcine; Second: Hicks; In Favor: Alcine, Braun, Geary,
Hicks, Jeffreys, Novak, Queen, and Swink.
Reason for Opposed
Vote (s)
N/A
ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff report
This document is a true and accurate statement of the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission. Approval of this document incorporates all of the findings of the
attached Staff Report and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Analysis.
__________________________________________ __________________________________________________
Planning Director Date Planning Commission Chairperson Date
Staff Coordinator: Matthew Klem: (919) 996-4637; [email protected]
OVERVIEW The subject site is located along New Bern Avenue, east of I-440, between its intersections
with Corporation Parkway and New Hope Road. The largest of the parcels is developed with
a shopping center of approximately 200,000 square feet in size. The other three parcels in
the rezoning request are vacant.
The area is more generally characterized by a suburban auto-oriented development pattern
along New Bern Avenue from the beltline to Hedingham Boulevard. North of the subject
site, along New Hope Road, is a development pattern of low to moderate density residential
subdivisions of a predominantly detached housing type.
The subject site consists of four parcels totaling nearly 33 acres and is split zoned between
CX-3, CX-3-PK, and CX-3-PK-CU. Adjacent properties are zoned Commercial Mixed Use and
Industrial Mixed Use with various frontages and conditions.
The proposal seeks to rezone the subject site from Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories (CX-3),
Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories-Parkway (CX-3-PK), and Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories-
Parkway- Conditional Use (CX-3-PK-CU) to Commercial Mixed Use-3 stories-Parking
Limited-Conditional Use (CX-3-PL-CU). The proposed zoning condition prohibits the adult
establishment use.
A portion of the subject site, which accounts for approximately 10 acres, has zoning
conditions from at 1987 zoning case. The conditions limit the development of this portion of
the subject site to 15 units per acre. The request would remove this limitation.
The existing zoning entitlement is estimated to be around 1.1 million square feet of mixed-
use development assuming roughly equal parts office, residential, and commercial uses. The
maximum stand-alone retail entitlement for the subject site is estimated to be
approximately 600,000 square feet which is three times larger than the existing shopping
center on site. The maximum office entitlement is just over one million square feet. The
office and retail entitlements are not anticipated to increase with the requested zoning. The
change in entitlement with the requested zoning impacts the amount of residential
development the site would permit by removing the condition limiting residential
entitlement. The residential density is anticipated to increase from 29 units per acre to 36
units per acre; an increase of about 240 units.
ZONING STAFF REPORT – Z-13-18 New Bern Ave and Corporation Pkwy
CONDITIONAL/GENERAL USE DISTRICT
The request would also change the frontage designation from Parkway (PK) to Parking
Limited (PL). Prior to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) 2014 remapping, the
subject site was split zoned between base districts Industrial (IND) and Thoroughfare
District (TD). During the remapping, the Parkway designation was assigned to the subject
site to emulate the requirements of the TD protective yard under the old Part 10 Code. The
remapping exercise resulted in a best match to emulate the legacy zoning entitlement with
the regulations of the new UDO. While the Parkway frontage did match the existing zoning
entitlement prior to the remapping, adopted policies in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan do
not specify that type of protective yard on the subject site.
The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for the subject site is Community Mixed Use,
as are properties to the east and west. South of the subject site, across New Bern Avenue,
the FLUM designation is Business and Commercial Services. North of the subject site,
properties are split between Low Density Residential and Moderate Density Residential
FLUM designations.
The subject site is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Center of approximately
280 acres in size as identified on the Urban Form Map. The subject site also fronts two
streets designated as Transit Emphasis Corridors (New Bern Avenue and New Hope Road),
and one street designated as an Urban Thoroughfare (Corporation Parkway).
OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Outstanding Issues
1. No CAC vote.
Suggested Mitigation
1. The North East CAC will meet again on August 9 to vote on the request.
Comprehensive Plan
Determination of the conformance of a proposed use or zone with the Comprehensive Plan
includes consideration of the following questions:
A. Is the proposal consistent with the vision, themes, and policies contained in the
Comprehensive Plan?
The request is consistent with the Coordinating Land Use and Transportation vision
theme. This vision theme encourages pedestrian facilities and higher density
residential and mixed-use development to support successful new local and regional
public transit service. The site is currently served by the GoRaleigh Route 15
WakeMed. This route offers fifteen minutes service which represents the highest
frequency the GoRaleigh transit system offers. The rezoning request to remove
conditions limiting residential density to fifteen units per acre helps to realize this
vision. Changing the Parkway frontage, which represents a suburban or rural
frontage type, to Parking Limited will also help to create a more walkable, urban,
and pedestrian friendly development.
B. Is the use being considered specifically designated on the Future Land Use Map in the
area where its location is proposed?
The rezoning request will maintain the base zoning district of Commercial Mixed
Use (CX). The subject site is identified as Community Mixed Use on the FLUM. CX is
the closest corresponding zoning district to this FLUM designation.
C. If the use is not specifically designated on the Future Land Use Map in the area where its
location is proposed, is it needed to service such a planned use, or could it be
established without adversely altering the recommended land use and character of the
area?
N/A
D. Will community facilities and streets be available at City standards to serve the use
proposed for the property?
Streets and other public infrastructure appear to be able to serve the requested
rezoning entitlement. The parks access level of service for this area is below average
and the area is also considered high priority for park land acquisition.
Future Land Use
Future Land Use designation:
The rezoning request is:
Consistent with the Future Land Use Map.
Inconsistent
The rezoning request will maintain the base zoning district of Commercial Mixed
Use (CX). The subject site is identified as Community Mixed Use on the FLUM. CX is
the closest corresponding zoning district to this FLUM designation and is therefore
consistent with the recommendations of the FLUM.
Urban Form
Urban Form designation:
The rezoning request is:
Not applicable (no Urban Form designation)
Consistent with the Urban Form Map.
Inconsistent
The subject site is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Center of
approximately 280 acres in size as identified on the Urban Form Map. The subject
site also fronts two streets designated as Transit Emphasis Corridors (New Bern
Avenue and New Hope Road), and one street designated as an Urban Thoroughfare
(Corporation Parkway). Each of these designations recommends an urban or hybrid
frontage. The rezoning request would map a Parking Limited frontage on the subject
site which is considered a hybrid frontage.
Compatibility
The proposed rezoning is:
Compatible with the property and surrounding area.
Incompatible.
The request is compatible with the property and the surrounding area. The request seeks to remove a condition that limits ten (10) acres of the site to a residential density of 15 units per acre and to change the Parkway frontage to a Parking Limited frontage. These changes would be non-disruptive to the surrounding area. The mapping of a Parking Limited frontage is consistent with the frontage designations of the majority of properties from I-440 to New Hope Road.
Public Benefits of the Proposed Rezoning
• Removing the condition that limits residential density limit of 15 units per acre will
allow the subject site to be developed with a more intense residential use.
• Changing the frontage designation from Parkway to Parking Limited will match the
predominant frontage designations for businesses along New Bern Avenue,
Corporation Parkway, and New Hope Road, creating a more pedestrian focused style
of development.
• The subject site is served by the GoRaleigh route 15 which provides the highest
frequency the GoRaleigh system offers: 15-minute service. Increasing the residential
entitlement and permitting a more pedestrian focused development type will make
a better use of the city’s existing transit service.
Detriments of the Proposed Rezoning
• The subject site has frontage on New Bern Avenue, Corporation Parkway, and New
Hope Road. Some portions of these frontages have mature landscaping that is
currently protected by the Parkway frontage designation. The removal of that
designation may result in the removal of mature trees.
• While the proposed zoning conditions prohibit adult establishments, other high
impact commercial uses could negatively impact the nearby Beacon Hill
neighborhood.
Policy Guidance
The rezoning request is consistent with the following policies:
Policy LU 1.2 Future Land Use and Zoning Consistency The Future Land Use Map shall be used in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan policies to evaluate zoning consistency including proposed zoning map amendments and zoning text changes.
• The rezoning request will maintain the base zoning district of Commercial Mixed
Use (CX). The subject site is identified as Community Mixed Use on the FLUM. CX is
the closest corresponding zoning district to this FLUM designation and is therefore
consistent with the recommendations of the FLUM.
Policy LU 1.3 Conditional Use District Consistency All conditions proposed as part of a conditional use district (CUD) should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
• The request removes a condition that limits density on a portion of the site to fifteen units per acre. The request also prohibits adult establishments on the site. Both changes are consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Policy LU 2.6 Zoning and Infrastructure Impacts Carefully evaluate all amendments to the zoning map that significantly increase permitted density or floor area to ensure that impacts to infrastructure capacity resulting from the projected intensification of development are adequately mitigated or addressed.
• The infrastructure in the area appears sufficient to support the increase in development entitlement on the subject site.
Policy LU 4.9 Corridor Development Promote pedestrian-friendly and transit-supportive development patterns along multi-modal corridors designated on the Growth Framework Map, and any corridor programmed for “transit intensive” investments such as reduced headways, consolidated stops, and bus priority lanes and signals.
• The subject site is located on New Bern Avenue which is identified as a multi-modal corridor on the Growth Framework Map. The rezoning request includes the removal of the Parkway frontage and the application of the Parking Limited frontage. The change in the frontage designation from a rural/suburban frontage type to a more urban frontage that is more pedestrian oriented and will encourage walkability.
Policy LU 6.1 Composition of Mixed-Use Centers Mixed-use centers should be comprised of well-mixed and integrated developments that avoid segregated uses and have well planned public spaces that bring people together and provide opportunities for active living and interaction.
• The request will remove a limitation on residential density entitlement. Removing that entitlement limit will potentially create a greater mix of uses on the site.
Policy LU 7.2 Shopping Center Reuse Promote the redevelopment of aging and high vacancy shopping centers into mixed-use developments with housing and public recreation facilities.
• Removing conditions that limit residential entitlement and provide the opportunity for a more urban development may encourage the redevelopment of a twenty-five-year-old shopping center.
Policy H 1.8 Zoning for Housing Ensure that zoning policy continues to provide ample opportunity for developers to build a variety of housing types, ranging from single-family to dense multi-family. Keeping the market well supplied with housing will moderate the costs of owning and renting, lessening affordability problems, and lowering the level of subsidy necessary to produce affordable housing.
• The request will remove a limit to residential density entitlement.
Policy UD 1.10 Frontage Coordinate frontage across multiple sites to create cohesive places. Encourage consistency with the designations on the Urban Form Map. Development in centers and along corridors targeted for public investment in transit and walkability should use a compatible urban form.
• The request will change the existing Parkway frontage to a Parking Limited frontage, which is called for in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The predominant frontage designation along New Bern Avenue, New Hope Road, and Corporation Parkway is Parking Limited.
The rezoning request is inconsistent with the following policies:
Policy LU 7.5 High-Impact Commercial Uses Ensure that the City’s zoning regulations limit the location and proliferation of fast food restaurants, sexually-oriented businesses, late night alcoholic beverage establishments, 24- hour mini-marts and convenience stores, and similar high impact commercial establishments that generate excessive late-night activity, noise, or otherwise affect the quality of life in nearby residential neighborhoods.
• While the proposed condition prohibits adult establishments, other potentially high-impact commercial uses, if established on Corporation Parkway, could negatively impact the nearby Beacon Hill neighborhood.
Impact Analysis
Transportation
The Raleigh Street Plan classifies New Bern Avenue as a six-lane divided avenue,
Corporation Parkway as a two-lane divided avenue, and North New Hope Road as a four-
lane divided avenue. New Bern Ave is NCDOT maintained and Corporation Parkway and
North New Hope Road are City of Raleigh maintained. Wilders Grove Lane extends from
New Bern Avenue into the site. Approximately 470 feet of Wilders Grove Lane is city-
maintained and the remainder is privately-maintained.
In accordance with UDO section 8.3.2, the maximum block perimeter for CX-3 zoning is
3,000 feet. The block perimeter for the Z-13-18 site, as defined by public rights-of-way for
New Bern Avenue, Corporation Parkway, and North New Hope Road is over 5,000 feet.
There are sidewalks on both sides of New Bern Avenue and North New Hope Road near the
site. A portion of Corporation Parkway is missing sidewalks along the west side of the street
and Wilders Grove Lane has sidewalks only along the west side of the street.
Within the last several years, there have been at least two pedestrian crashes within the Z-
13-18 site, as well as at least four pedestrian crashes on New Bern Avenue just south of the
site.
The Raleigh Long-Term Bikeway Plan contains bicycle lanes on Corporation Parkway and
separated Bikeways on New Bern Avenue and North New Hope Church Road.
There was a bicycle crash at the intersection of Corporation Parkway and New Bern Avenue
within the last several years.
The Raleigh Greenway Plan contains a greenway trail just north of the site, connecting the
Crabtree Creek Trail and the Neuse River Trail. It shows a connector trail east of the site,
parallel to North New Hope Road.
Site access will be provided via New Bern Avenue, Corporation Parkway, and North New
Hope Road. The subject parcels have a combined road frontage of approximately 3,650 feet.
According to the Raleigh Street Design Manual, driveways for CX zoning that are accessing
streets with ROW width greater than 80 feet must be spaced 300 feet apart. The Z-13-18
site would be restricted to two access points on New Bern Avenue and one access point on
Wilders Grove Lane. A maximum of four access points may be acceptable on Corporation
Parkway and three on North New Hope Road, unless a design adjustment is granted.
Offers of cross access to adjacent parcels shall be made in accordance with the Raleigh UDO
section 8.3.5.D. The Z-13-18 site is surrounded by other commercial developments that are
interconnected via private access drives. Redevelopment in the area will be required to
meet current standards for street connectivity and pedestrian access.
Other Projects within the Area
There is an NCDOT / GoRaleigh Transit Transfer Facility Project proposed at New Bern
Commons, just east of North New Hope Road. There is also a federally funded, city-initiated
project to add a third eastbound lane to New Bern between Freedom Drive and Patriot
Drive, where the street currently has a short two-lane bottleneck. It was funded from the
federal fiscal year 2019 Locally Administered Projects Program (LAPP) administered by
CAMPO.
TIA Determination
Approval of case Z-13-2018 would not increase average peak hour nor daily trip volumes.
There have been a high number of crashes at the surrounding intersections in the past three
years and there is a high severity index at the intersection of Corporation Parkway and Lake
Woodard Drive. There are other site contextual concerns that could require a traffic study at
the time of a site plan or subdivision application. A traffic study is not required for the
rezoning case Z-13-2018.
Z-13-18 Existing Land Use Daily AM PM
Partially Retail, Partially Undeveloped 7,260 247 656
Z-13-18 Current Zoning Entitlements Daily AM PM
Residential, Retail, Office 14,792 1,328 1,720
Z-13-18 Proposed Zoning Maximums Daily AM PM
Residential, Retail, Office 14,792 1,328 1,720
Z-13-18 Trip Volume Change (Proposed Maximums minus Current Entitlements)
Daily AM PM
0 0 0
Impact Identified: No TIA required.
Transit
The Z-13-2018 subject site is served by GoRaleigh Route 15 WakeMed with buses running
every 15 minutes and by Route 15L Trawick with busses running every 45 minutes. There
are three bus stops adjacent to the subject site that are served by both the Route 15
WakeMed and the Route 15L Trawick.
Impact Identified: None.
Hydrology
Floodplain No FEMA Floodplain present
Drainage Basin Marsh and Crabtree
Stormwater Management Subject to stormwater regulations under Article 9 of
UDO.
Overlay District none
Impact Identified: None.
Public Utilities
Maximum Demand (current use)
Maximum Demand (current zoning)
Maximum Demand (proposed zoning)
Water 590,000 gpd 590,000 gpd 739,375 gpd Waste Water 590,000 gpd 590,000 gpd 739,375 gpd
The proposed rezoning would add approximately 149,375 gpd to the wastewater collection and water distribution systems of the City. There are existing sanitary sewer and water mains adjacent to the proposed rezoning area. At the time of development plan submittal, a Downstream Sewer Capacity Study may be required to determine adequate capacity to support the proposed development. Any improvements identified by the study would be required to be permitted prior to the issuance of Building Permit & constructed prior to release of a Certificate of Occupancy. Verification of water available for fire flow is required as part of the Building Permit process. Any water system improvements recommended by the analysis to meet fire flow requirements will also be required of the Developer. Impact Identified: None.
Parks and Recreation
This site is not directly impacted by any existing or proposed greenway trails, corridors,
or connectors. The nearest existing park access is provided by Marsh Creek Park (2
miles) and Lockwood Park (2.8 miles). The nearest existing greenway trail access is
provided by Crabtree Creek Greenway Trail (1.4 miles) and Neuse River Greenway Trail
(2 miles).
Park access level of service is below average. The area is a high priority for park land
acquisition.
Impact Identified: None.
Urban Forestry
On the largest of the four properties in questions, the area with existing trees that
would meet the requirements for primary tree conservation are along New Bern
Avenue. The proposed rezoning will eliminate the possibility of primary tree
conservation due to the associated build-to requirements of the Parking Limited
frontage. The remaining three parcels that make up the subject site are less than two
acres in size and tree conservation would not be required at time of subdivision or site
plan.
Impact Identified: Primary tree conservation areas may not be required at the time of
redevelopment.
Impacts Summary
Public Utilities staff has noted the potential need for a Downstream Sewer Capacity
Study at the time of redevelopment.
Urban Forestry staff has noted that the application of the Parking Limited frontage will
eliminate the possibility of primary tree conservation on the site.
Mitigation of Impacts
The applicant could consider conditions to preserve existing mature trees on the subject
site.
Conclusion
The proposed rezoning is requesting two fundamental changes: 1) the application of the
Parking Limited frontage; 2) the removal of a zoning condition that limits the residential
density entitlement on approximately 10 acres of the subject site to a maximum 15 units
per acre. The result of the change will increase the residential dwelling entitlement by
approximately 240 units. The increase in residential entitlement in this area is supported by
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The existing non-residential entitlement does not change.
The change in frontage designation from Parkway to Parking limited will result in the
potential elimination of mature landscaping along New Bern Avenue and Corporation
Parkway. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan recommends that New Bern Avenue, New Hope
Road, and Corporation Parkway have urban or hybrid frontages to encourage a pedestrian-
friendly, walkable built environment that encourages multiple modes of transportation.
Additionally, the Parkway frontage is recommended in rural or suburban areas where
multi-modal access is not emphasized. Considering the level of transit service currently
provided to the subject site and the 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s suggested mixed use nature
of the subject site, the removal of the density-limiting zoning condition and the Parkway
frontage designation will help to realize the envisioned land use pattern in the area.
Case Timeline
Date Revision [change to requested
district, revised conditions, etc.]
Notes
3/16/2018 Pre-application conference
3/28/2018 Neighborhood meeting
6/14/2018 Fist Northeast CAC meeting
6/26/2018 Planning Commission begins
review
8/9/2018 Northeast CAC vote
8/14/2018 Planning Commission meeting
Appendix
Surrounding Area Land Use/ Zoning Summary
SUBJECT
PROPERTY NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST
Existing Zoning
CX-3, CX-3-PK,
CX-3-PK-CU CX-3-PK-CU
CX-3-PL, IX-3,
IX-3-PL, IH
IX-3-PL-CU, CX-3-PL-CU
CX-3-PL, CX-3-PK
Additional Overlay
- - - - -
Future Land Use
Community Mixed Use
Low Density Residential
Business & Commercial
Services, Community Mixed Use
Moderate Density
Residential, Community Mixed Use
Low Density Residential, Community Mixed Use
Current Land Use
Retail Office
Light Industrial,
Vehicle Fuel Sales
Self Service Storage,
Retail Retail
Urban Form (if applicable)
Mixed Use Center, Transit
Emphasis Corridor,
Urban Thoroughfare
Mixed Use Center, Urban
Thoroughfare
Mixed Use Center, Transit
Emphasis Corridor
Mixed Use Center, Transit
Emphasis Corridor
Mixed Use Center, Urban
Thoroughfare
Current vs. Proposed Zoning Summary
Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning
Zoning CX-3, CX-3-PK, CX-3-PK-CU CX-3-PL-CU
Total Acreage 32.82 32.82
Setbacks for CX-3: Front: Side: Rear:
5’ min
0’ to 6’ min 0’ to 6’ min
0’ min (Parking Limited Frontage)
0’ to 6’ 0’ to 6’
Setbacks for CX-3-PK: Front: Side: Rear:
50’ min (Parkway Frontage)
0’ to 6’ 0’ to 6’
0’ min (Parking Limited Frontage)
0’ to 6’ 0’ to 6’
Residential Density: 28.76 36.05
Max. # of Residential Units
944 1,183
Max. Gross Building SF 1,193,541 1,530,809
Max. Gross Office SF 1,126,236 1,126,236
Max. Gross Retail SF 349,653 349,653
Max. Gross Industrial SF
874,350 874,350
Potential F.A.R .89 1.07
*The development intensities for proposed zoning districts were estimated using an impact analysis tool. The estimates
presented are only to provide guidance for analysis.
Rezoning Application ■~~~~!~~ CITY PLANI\JING
Department of City Planning 11 Exchange Plaza, Suite 300 I Raleigh, NC 27601 I 919-996-2626
REZONING REQUEST
• General Use [ii Conditional Use • Master Plan b,. Cf·?:, ~ C'i-3-f~-cu Existing Zoning Base District eX Height 3 Frontage PK Overlay(s) ____ _
Proposed Zoning Base District eX Height 3 Frontage PL Overlay(s) ____ _
Click here to view the Zoning Map. Search for the address to be rezoned, then turn on the 'Zoning' and 'Overlay' layers.
If the property has been previously rezoned, provide the rezoning case number: Z-6 7 -1 9 8 7
OFFICE USE ONLY
Transaction #
Rezoning Case #
Provide all previous transaction numbers for Coordinated Team Reviews, Due Diligence Sessions, or Pre-Submittal Conferences:
:. ·.
GENERAL INFORMATION ·.
Date Date Amended ( 1) Date Amended (2)
Property Address Q ' 4121, 4201 New Bern Avenue; 1412 Corporation Parkway
Property Pl N 1724-96-0124; 1724-86-8905; 1724-86-8153; 1724-86-27 461 Deed Reference (book/page) 155201111 •: 1 0S?B/194; 155201111 •: 1229212297
Nearest Intersection New Bern Avenue, between Corporation Parkway and N New Hope Road
Property Size (acres) 32. 82 I (For PD Applications Only) Total Units Total Square Feet
Property Owner/ Address
Phone 919.864.3135 I Fax See attached
Email [email protected] Project Contact Person/Address
Phone919.645.4317 I Fax Michael Birch Morris, Russell, Eagle & Worley, PLLC 2235 Gateway Access Point, Suite 201
Email [email protected] Raleigh, NC 27607
Owner/ Agent Signature iJA., . ) Email ,4v- I -!}J--
ti A rezoning application will not be considered complete until all required submittal components listed on the Rezoning Checklist have been received and approved.
PAGE 1 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
Address
RIDDLE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES WILDERS GROVE SHOPPING CENTER
REZONING PETITION ATTACHMENT
0, 4121, and 4201 New Bern Avenue; 1412 Corporation Parkway
PINs • 0 New Bern Ave
o 1724-96-0124 • 4121 New Bern Ave
o 1724-86-8905 • 4201 New Bern Ave
o 1724-86-8153 • 1412 Corporation Parkway
o 1724-86-2746
Deed Book/Page • 0 New Bern Ave
o 15520/1716 • 4121 New Bern Ave
o 10578/194 • 4201 New Bern Ave
o 15520/1716 • 1412 Corporation Parkway
o 12292/2297
Owners • 0 New Bern Ave
o Joseph P. Riddle III o PO Box 53729 o Fayetteville, NC 28305
• 4121 New Bern Ave o Wilders Grove, Inc. o PO Box 53729 o Fayetteville, NC 28305
• 4201 New Bern Ave o Joseph P. Riddle III o PO Box 53729 o Fayetteville, NC 28305
• 1412 Corporation Pkwy o Riddle Commercial Properties, Inc. o PO Box 53646 o Fayetteville, NC 28305
·.
REZONING APPLICATION ADDENDUM #1
Comprehensive Plan Analysis OFFICE USE ONLY
Transaction # The applicant is asked to analyze the impact of the rezoning request. State Statutes require that the rezoning either be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, or that the request be reasonable and in the public interest. Rezoning Case #
STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY ·.
Provide brief statements regarding whether the rezoning request is consistent with the future land use designation, the urban form map, and any applicable policies contained within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates the 4 parcels as Community Mixed Use, which applies to larger shopping centers. CX is the district that most closely aligns with this designation. This Future Land Use category calls for appropriate urban form frontage standards, recognizing that some of these designated areas are auto-oriented
1. shopping plazas fronting on high-volume arterial roadways. The Wilders Grove shopping center fits this description, and the Parking Limited frontage district is most appropriate given the built environment and the development pattern on the north and south side of New Bern Avenue and along New Hope Road and Corporation Parkway.
The property is located in a mixed-use center, and is surrounded on three sides by two Transit Emphasis Corridors and one Urban Thoroughfare.
2 The descriptions for both types of corridors call for a hybrid approach to frontage based on context. The -PL frontage district is a hybrid frontage
· and is consistent with the Urban Form designations based on the context of the auto-oriented shopping center and the surrounding properties along New Bern Avenue, New Hope Road and Corporation Parkway.
The rezoning is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies: LU 1.2, LU 3.2, LU 4.9, 3· LU 5.1, LU 6.3, and UD 1.10.
4.
PUBLIC BENEFITS .·
Provide brief statements regarding the public benefits derived as a result of the rezoning request.
The proposed rezoning would benefit the public by providing a consistent frontage along New 1· Bern Avenue.
The proposed rezoning would benefit the public by facilitating the development and 2 · redevelopment of an auto-oriented shopping center consistent with the Urban Form guidance.
3.
4.
PAGE 3 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
REZONING APPLICATION ADDENDUM #2
Impact on Historic Resources
The applicant is asked to analyze the impact of the rezoning request on historic resources. For the purposes of this section, a historic resource is defined as any site, structure, sign, or other feature of the property to be rezoned that is listed in the National Register of Historic Places or designated by the City of Raleigh as a landmark or contributing to a Historic Overlay District.
INVENTORY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES .·
OFFICE USE ONLY
Transaction #
Rezoning Case #
List in the space below all historic resources located on the property to be rezoned. For each resource, indicate how the proposed zoning would impact the resource.
No historic resources are located on the property.
PROPOSED MITIGATION
Provide brief statements describing actions that will be taken to mitigate all negative impacts listed above.
Not applicable.
PAGE4 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The applicant must respond to the Urban Design Guidelines contained in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan if: a) The property to be rezoned is within a "City Growth Center" or "Mixed-Use Center'', or b) The property to be rezoned is located along a "Main Street" or "Transit Emphasis Corridor"
as shown on the Urban Form Map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Urban Form Designation: Mixed Use Center Click here to view the Urban Form Map.
All Mixed-Use developments should generally provide retail (such as eating establishments, food stores, and banks), and other 1. such uses as office and residential within walking distance of each other. Mixed uses should be arranged in a compact and
pedestrian friendly form.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Response:
The proposed zoning permits retail, office and residential uses, consistent with this guideline. Also, the property is within walking distance to a mix of uses.
Within all Mixed-Use Areas buildings that are adjacent to lower density neighborhoods should transition (height, design, distance and/or landscaping) to the lower heights or be comparable in height and massing. Response:
The property is not adjacent to lower density neighborhoods.
A mixed use area's road network should connect directly into the neighborhood road network of the surrounding community, providing multiple paths for movement to and through the mixed use area. In this way, trips made from the surrounding residential neighborhood(s) to the mixed use area should be possible without requiring travel along a major thoroughfare or arterial. Response:
The property is connected to Corporation Parkway and North New Hope Road which connect to adjacent neighborhoods, consistent with this guideline.
Streets should interconnect within a development and with adjoining development. Cul-de-sacs or dead-end streets are generally discouraged except where topographic conditions and/or exterior lot line configurations offer no practical alternatives for connection or through traffic. Street stubs should be provided with development adjacent to open land to provide for future connections. Streets should be planned with due regard to the designated corridors shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. Response:
No new streets are contemplated as part of this development.
New development should be comprised of blocks of public and/or private streets (including sidewalks). Block faces should have a length generally not exceeding 660 feet. Where commercial driveways are used to create block structure, they should include the same pedestrian amenities as public or private streets. Response:
No new streets or intersections are contemplated as part of this development.
PAGES OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
A primary task of all urban architecture and landscape design is the physical definition of streets and public spaces as places of shared use. Streets should be lined by buildings rather than parking lots and should provide interest especially for pedestrians. Garage entrances and/or loading areas should be located at the side or rear of a properly. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures that development of the property will be consistent with this guideline.
Buildings should be located close to the pedestrian-oriented street (within 25 feet of the curb), with off-street parking behind and/or beside the buildings. When a development plan is located along a high volume corridor without on-street parking, one bay of parking separating the building frontage along the corridor is a preferred option. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures that development of the property will be consistent with this guideline.
If the site is located at a street intersection, the main building or main parl of the building should be placed at the comer. Parking, loading or service should not be located at an intersection. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures that development of the property will be consistent with this guideline.
To ensure that urban open space is well-used, it is essential to locate and design it carefully. The space should be located where it is visible and easily accessible from public areas (building entrances, sidewalks). Take views and sun exposure into account as well. Response:
Outdoor amenity areas will be provided consistent with the UDO.
New urban spaces should contain direct access from the adjacent streets. They should be open along the adjacent sidewalks and allow for multiple points of entry. They should also be visually permeable from the sidewalk, allowing passersby to see directly into the space. Response:
Outdoor amenity areas will be provided consistent with the UDO.
The perimeter of urban open spaces should consist of active uses that provide pedestrian traffic for the space including retail, cafes, and restaurants and higher-density residential. Response:
Sidewalks and outdoor amenity areas will be provided consistent with the UDO, consistent with this guideline.
A properly defined urban open space is visually enclosed by the fronting of buildings to create an outdoor "room" that is comforlable to users. Response:
Outdoor amenity areas will be provided consistent with the UDO.
PAGE6 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
New public spaces should provide seating opportunities. Response:
Outdoor amenity areas will be provided consistent with the UDO.
Parking Jots should not dominate the frontage of pedestrian-oriented streets, interrupt pedestrian routes, or negatively impact surrounding developments. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures development consistent with this guideline.
Parking Jots should be located behind or in the interior of a block whenever possible. Parking Jots should not occupy more than 1/3 of the frontage of the adjacent building or not more than 64 feet, whichever is Jess. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage will ensure that parking is consistent with this guideline.
Parking structures are clearly an important and necessary element of the overall urban infrastructure but, given their utilitarian elements, can give serious negative visual effects. New structures should merit the same level of materials and finishes as that a principal building would, care in the use of basic design elements cane make a significant improvement. Response:
No new parking structures are contemplated with this development.
Higher building densities and more intensive land uses should be within walking distance of transit stops, permitting public transit to become a viable alternative to the automobile. Response:
Wilder's Grove Shopping Center is served by the WakeMed bus route, a GoRaleigh route to Knightdale/Wendell/Zebulon, and a GoRaleigh connector route.
Convenient, comfortable pedestrian access between the transit stop and the building entrance should be planned as part of the overall pedestrian network. Response:
The UDO requires convenient pedestrian access between the building entrance and the transit stop, consistent with this guideline.
All development should respect natural resources as an essential component of the human environment. The most sensitive landscape areas, both environmentally and visually, are steep slopes greater than 15 percent, watercourses, and floodplains. Any development in these areas should minimize intervention and maintain the natural condition except under extreme circumstances. Where practical, these features should be conserved as open space amenities and incorporated in the overall site design. Response:
There are no known sensitive natural resources on the property.
PAGE 7 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
It is the intent of these guidelines to build streets that are integral components of community design. Public and private streets, as well as commercial driveways that serve as primary pedestrian pathways to building entrances, should be designed as the main public spaces of the City and should be scaled for pedestrians. Response:
Sidewalks and driveways will be provided in accordance with the UDO.
Sidewalks should be 5-8 feet wide in residential areas and located on both sides of the street. Sidewalks in commercial areas and Pedestrian Business Overlays should be a minimum of 14-18 feet wide to accommodate sidewalk uses such as vendors, merchandising and outdoor seating. Response:
Sidewalks will be provided in accordance with the UDO.
Streets should be designed with street trees planted in a manner appropriate to their function. Commercial streets should have trees which complement the face of the buildings and which shade the sidewalk. Residential streets should provide for an appropriate canopy, which shadows both the street and sidewalk, and serves as a visual buffer between the street and the home. The typical width of the street landscape strip is 6-8 feet. This width ensures healthy street trees, precludes tree roots from breaking the sidewalk, and provides adequate pedestrian buffering. Street trees should be at least 6 1/4" caliper and should be consistent with the City's landscaping, lighting and street sight distance requirements. Response:
Street trees will be provided in accordance with the UDO.
Buildings should define the streets spatially. Proper spatial definition should be achieved with buildings or other architectural elements (including certain tree plantings) that make up the street edges aligned in a disciplined manner with an appropriate ratio of height to width. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures development will be consistent with this guideline.
The primary entrance should be both architecturally and functionally on the front facade of any building facing the primary public street. Such entrances shall be designed to convey their prominence on the fronting facade. Response:
The Parking Limited frontage ensures development will be consistent with this guideline.
The ground level of the building should offer pedestrian interest along sidewalks. This includes windows entrances, and architectural details. Signage, awnings, and ornamentation are encouraged. Response:
The Parking Limtied frontage ensures development will be consistent with this guideline.
The sidewalks should be the principal place of pedestrian movement and casual social interaction. Designs and uses should be complementary to that function. Response:
Sidewalks will comply with applicable UDO standards, consistent with this guideline.
PAGE 8 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
REZONING APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ("Rezoning Checklist")
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT COMPLETED BY
CITY STAFF
General Requirements - General Use or Conditional Use Rezoning YES N/A YES NO N/A
1. I have referenced this Rezoning Checklist and by using this as a guide, r~ it will ensure that I receive a complete and thorough first review by the ~ • City of Raleigh -
2. Rezoning application review fee (see Fee Schedule for rate) ool • -,,
3. Completed application; Include electronic version via cd or flash drive ~ • 4. Two sets of stamped envelopes addressed to all property owners within
~ • 100 feet of property to be rezoned
5. Pre-Application Conference [¼) • ~-~ 6. Neighborhood Meeting notice and report '&al • ~
7. Trip Generation Study • ~ '•," 8. Traffic Impact Analysis • ~ '"-.J
9. Completed and signed zoning conditions '5a • ~ ,.,
10. Completed Comprehensive Plan Consistency Analysis ·~ • " 11. Completed Response to the Urban Design Guidelines sa, • 12. For applications filed by a third party, proof of actual notice to the • ~
-~ property owner
13. Master Plan (for properties requesting Planned Development or Campus • ~ ·~
District)
PAGE9 OF 13 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 02.13.17
REZONING OF PROPERTY CONSISTING OF+/- 32.82 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NEW BERN AVENUE, WEST OF NORTH NEW
HOPE ROAD, IN THE CITY OF RALEIGH
REPORT OF MEETING WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS ON MARCH28,2018
Pursuant to applicable provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance, a meeting was held with respect to a potential rezoning with adjacent property owners on Wednesday, March 28, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. The property considered for this potential rezoning total approximately 32.82 acres, and is located north of New Bern Avenue, west of North New Hope Road, in the City of Raleigh, having Wake County Parcel Identification Numbers 1724-96-0124, 1724-86-8905, 1724-86-8153, and 1724-86-2746. This meeting was held at the Marsh Creek Park Community Center, located at 3050 N New Hope Road, Raleigh, NC 27604. All owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property were invited to attend the meeting. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a copy of the neighborhood meeting notice. A copy of the required mailing list for the meeting invitations is attached hereto as Exhibit B. A summary of the items discussed at the meeting is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Attached hereto as Exhibit Dis a list of individuals who attended the meeting.
EXHIBIT A- NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE
!-.,ITCHA.EL BIRCH Email: mhir,...h-@moofa,ru;s,;al.OllCJ. Dir~: (f::'19.) 645-4317
RUSSELL MOFJUS.. RUSS.ELL, EAGLE & WORLEY.PI.LC
2215 GATE\VAY ACCESS ronn, SUITE2DI Rl\LEI.GH, NORTH C>\ROLIN...S... 27 6ff7
Tel~ph.on:: (919') 645-43.ttO Facsimile: (919)510-6802
To:
From:
Neighboring Property ~ner
i\ficha el Birch
Date:
P. 0, Box 19001 R.sl~~ NC 27 619 ,,~z.; .m ci:rris:russall.eom
Re: N eighb orhoo d Meeting for Potential Rezoning of \1irtlders. Grove Shopping Center
\Ve are counsel for \V"'tlders Grove,. Inc.,Riddle Co., Inc. and Joseph Riddle {the '"0.-.ners"} the o\'\ners of four parcels that are part of the \1ttlden Gro';/e ShoppingCente-r,.tota.1:ing approximately 32.82 acres. located on the north side ofNew BemAvenue andwestofN.Nev,;r Hope Road{the "'"Pr-operties'), The Properties ha,·e addre.s.&es of 420.1, 4121 and O New BemA·venue and 1412 Corporation Parkway, and Parcel Identification Numbers 1714-86-8153, 1724-86-8905, 1724-96-0124 and 1724-86-2746. The Properties. are currently zoned CX--3, CX-3-PK and CX-3-PK-CU, and the °"mers are considering rezoning the Properties to CX-3-PK-CU.
You are invited to attend a meetingto dis.cus.sthe pote-ntialrezoning. \Ve have scheduled a meeting i;;;,cith surrounding property o"ners on \J;,<ednesday, ivfarch 18, 2018 at 6:30 p.m. Tiris meeting will b-e held in the meetingroomatthe!\farsh Creek Co:r.t1rr.1Llllity Center.,located at3050 N. New Hope Road,.Raleigh,NG 27604.
The City ofRaleighrequires aneighborhoodmeetinginvolvingthe ot\ners of property -....,i.thin:500 feet of the Property prior to filing a rezoning application. After the meeting, ,ve. ·will prepare a report for the Planning Department regarding the items. disc1.m.ed at the meeting.
Please do nothe-sitate to contact me directly if you have any questions or v.-ish to discuss any issues. I c-anbereachedat919.645A317 and mbirch:@morrisrus.se.ll.c-om .• 4.J.s:o, for more infom1ation about rezoning, you may v-isit V,'.'\',w.raleighnc.gov or contact the Raleigh City Planning Department at 919.996.2626 or [email protected].
1724&3-S-f-05 'NILDERS GROVE INC PO BOX Et2,72fl FAYETTEVl'LLE NG 282-06-372."2
17247fil"42:2 UFE CRAFT LLC 51 ff7 WOODFIELD lAKE RD CARY NC 27518-7143
1724782432 WTKCLLC 55!J~, BREAMORE CIR RALEIGH NC 275ff,..HBB
1724762432 LNK INVESTMENT INC 5505, BREA MORE Cl R RALEIGH NC 27,e;tf ... t t,58
1724752412 AT1DD LLC PO BOX ~;J21G RALEIGH NC 27622-02t 9
17247ooW5 COWAN, JENNIFER 134:B BEACON V!LU<.GE DR RALEIGH NC 27&)4-E4i'4
172477ME8 LA.MANE, VALES 1407 BEACON VILU-,GE DR RALEIGH NC 275Ci4-E4~0
1724ID22:1 DAVILA, ANDREV\I 1415 BEACON VILL&.GE DR RALEIGH NC 27&-:4-S4't<O
17247!.8G25 fH5 PROPERTY .NORTH CAROLINA LP !NVffAHON HOMES-TM DEPT 1717 MAIN ST STE 2.0C.:i DALLAS TX 752!:J H-657
172477.Bt~f. BULLOCK, DELPHINE D 1420 BEACON Vll.U<.GE DR RALEIGH NC 27e•54-E4n
EXHIBIT B - NOTICE LIST
1724.7fi3B:53 CIRCLE K STORES !NC PROPERTY TAX DEPT ocn PO BOX 520!3,f, PHOENIX AZ. B,:,::,12-2085
17247624.32 ROCK QIJARRY PROPERTtES LLC 351G ROCK QUARRY RD RALEIGH NC 27510-51 t£:
17247132432 D'JOAL PROPERTIES, LLC 51271 FANTASIA DR MACOMB Ml 48042-'6037
1724762432: NDRMANDALE PROPERTIES LLC PO BO)( 3~002 RALEIGH NC 27622-1Dey2
17247528g,2 VH .. LAGE @ WESTGATE HMOVVNERS ASSOC PO BOX 2,:,;,;:.,9 RALEIGH NC 27f.l 19--0969
17247&7917 KINLAW, K REm 'WALKER, JENNIFER 1352 BEACON VILLAGE DH RALEIGH NC 276~~
1724777[!5) K~PUNt MSUNDU ETAL MANIONG00 JOSIE Kr"PUNI 1400 BEACOhl VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-B4n
1724777254 SNEAD, 'N DAV!D JR SNEAD, ROS;.N 141 Q BEACOt4 VlLU,GE DR RALEIGH NC 27804-84·~•
1724778•5~ CARSON, CATHY LUANNE 14.12. BEACON VILLAGE OH RALEIGH NC 27604-84';;,.3
17247783{:•3 NAP OP.A, SHAWN D 1427 BEACON VILLAGE DR P.ALEIGH NC 17804-34~'.}
17247£2432 BEACON PLAZA . .SH-OPP ING GNTR CONDO POEOX97603 P.ALEIGH NC 2762-4-7803
1724762432 EAOUC J f(ENNETH ED'lw'ARDS 5909 FALLS OF NEUSE RD STE 2i'.>Jl P.ALEIGH NC 27609-?000
1724782432 CCM54 LLC JAMES I ANTHONY JR PO E,OX 10810 RALEIGH NC 27505-0810
1724782432 AT100LLC POEOX3!J-:219 RALEIGH NC 276.22-021 g
1724786934 FARRIS, KA.THERINE ANN 1344 BE.!vCON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27'ein4-B4g.?
172478821 i WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY RYAN LLC PO BOX e.t!o•7 ATLANTA GA 30343--0607
1724777092 NGUYEN, TRISH LY MINH NGO, VINH 1404 BEJ..CON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8493
17:24777277 PARKER, :31-:!AV•/N MAURICE PAP.KER, MARIA.MA TOURE 1423 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8490
1724778172 AMH ::_,c,14-2 SORROWER LLC .AMERI-CAN HOMES 4 RENT 30601 AGOURA RD STE ::mo AGOURA HUS CA ~~S':t1-2148
17:24778323 SHELTON, ROBERT SR SHELTON, SARAN ELAINE 1431 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8490
172477S.3.Sfi KING, IRIS M 1501 BEACON VIUAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27&'.J+M,g 1
172477gz75 MARTIN, KE\lfN C mn RIVER COMMONS DR KNIGHTDALE tfC 2754:~9Ei2Q
172477?425 AMH 2D 14--3 BORRO'.''IER LLC AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT 30001; AGOURA. RD STE 200 AGOURA HILLS CA Q13)J1-214E
RALEIGH CfT'( OF PO BOX 5~D RALEIGH :NC 27e,J:2-05?0
1724E.54i:-05 MOORE & SONS REAL TY l~I LLC 3212 0{:>.GM}OOD DR RALEIGH NC 27e04-.WSO
1724E6t5~5 POPE, L.!,.RRY E 132.,:, MARSHALL FARM 3T 'NAKE FOREST NC 2:?f,8;7-4342
1724~iE4175
HILL PROPERTIES 17101 GREEN DOLPHrN LN GORNEUUS NC w53.1-7B92
1724E,7C(~,22 MIUAN, PABLO ENR}:2UE OONZA ACOSTA, tSORA 1504 BEACON VILL.!..BE DR RALEIGH NC 27&~4@2
1724.e,704,;;, 1 TOMPKINS, CHRISTOPHER TOMPV•N,:;, Kts.YDEN 1516 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27&j:4...S4f,2
1724571.f.39 ONWUKWE, EMMANUEL M Ot./WIJKWE, BLff.SINGlJ 1601 BEA.CON Vl:LU..GE DR RALEIGH NC 27r.:,:::'4-&5:'.o5
1724779129 CARR, M1CHELLE L 1424: BEACO.N VILLAGE DR R,ALEIGH NC 276(].:!,--Mg>J
i 7247792~;;, DAVIS, JO.AN C 1500 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 276~92
172477~.5·~ GRAHAM. THOMAS H 1513 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 2760:4--849~
17248515~ 1310 CP UC 200 CARPATHkAN WAY RALEIGH NC 2761fe-16t3
172:48535-1]0 4S PROPERTIES UC 6725 UNl\fERSm' PKWY
RUP..AL HAU NC 27Mf ... ~iE
17:2.48tl24f(i.2, POPE, LARRY E 1325 MARSHALL FARM ST WAKE FOREST NC 27,Sc~,7-4242
172~868153 RIDDLE JOSEPH P Ill POBOX53729 FAYETTEVILLE NG 28305-3729
1724.87034f. ROBERTSON, EMMA J i 508 BE.AC ON VILLAGE DR R.i!.:LEIGH NC 27604-84•~
172.(870515
AMH NC PHOPERTiES LP 30001 AGOUF .. A RD STE 2C(1
AGOUP.A HILLS CA 91301-2148
1724.871663 AMH 2015-2 HURROVVER UC AMERlCAN :HOMES -4 RENT 30001 AGOURA RD STE 20J AGOUP.A HILLS CA 91301-2148
1724779242 BROV'l.'N, BRUCE E vV!LLIAMS-BROWR TARA/4. 1428 BE.A.Cm~ VILLAGE DR P.AiEIGH NC 27804-8493
1724779403 IAASHBVRN, ,ALLEN CfWG 15D5 HEA.CON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27Ei!J4-8491
17.24779582 ZAVALRA JOSE PEREZ, ROCEUA 1517 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8491
172-4851872 M M FOWLER fNC 4220:NEAL RD Dl..}RHAM NC 27705-2322
17.24861293 L & P ASSOCLATES LLC 4001 NE'.\' BERN AVE STE 102 AA.LEIGH NC 27510-2779
172-4852746 RtDDLE CO l~JC POBOX53646 FAYEt ! t:VlLLE NG 2E:3'25-3645
1724870056 COOOINS CONSTRUGTTDN CO 3939 GLEN'NOOD-AVE S1E 165 PALEIGH NC 27612--4139
172487!]3/8 AMH 2vt,5--2 BORRO'WER LLC
AMERICAN HOMES- 4 RE~'T 30601 A.GOUP..A RD- STE 200 AGOURA HrLL::: CA ~r31.;. 1-2 i4B
1724871424' SN-~'DER, SEA~J ERIC 1520 BEA.CON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC .27604-8492
17.248.71675 GILLETTE, VERDIN.AG 1609 E-E.i!;.CQN VILLAGE DR RO..-LE!GH NC 27504-8505
1724-8724M MIR.ANDA., MAmo AL MIR.ANDA,, JULIA L V 1 f.lOO BEACON V!UAGE DR RALEIB:H NC 27ei:.4-S5Ci4
1724S726tB 'NARR MICHAEL 1NARR, CHRISTl~.JA 1612 BEACON VILUI.GE DR RALEIC-.'H NC 27cl.I'4-'BbM
1724-11,73722 MUFANDAEDZA., IT Al 80lliWELL Wt-ltTLEY. LAUR.A 1524 BEACON VI UAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27fi:ll4-S5"".14
17245.75724 STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION CORPORATION PARK~\'AY PO BOX26BD7 RALEIGH NC 27c1 i-e.807
1724~•1!:2:4 RIDDLE, JOSEPH Pm PO BOX:53729 FAYETTEi.nLLE NC 2830E~3?2;;
172.lf"'523e7 VYILDERS GROVE A2.SOC~ATES: PO BOX464 RALEIGH NC 27~'.:!2AI'464
1724?E6306 WILDERS GROVE AC-.::,DClATESPO BOX¥.A RALElf3iH NC 2.7t-02-C'4M
1724~45 NEW HOPE ROAD- RALEIGH LLC
PO B0>::~57 GRAHAM NC 272E~'.:'ft67
172-¼7637B M3,V HOPE STORA(;£ LLC PO BOX 957 GRAHAM NC 27:2!.:$-!J:?57
1734:)e,4f,c,5 'i'i'AL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST MSC6~,5 PO 60X.&Ii5D BENTONVIUE AR 7271'2-8055
1724872571; YOUNG, RICHARD 1.'r i 604 BEACON VILLAGE DH RALEIGH NC 27604-8504
1724872'.623 BANERJEE, AMA.l K BANERJEE, RATI<t~, 1 e 16 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8504
172487551J2, STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION CORPORATION PARl'~V.AY PO HOX 2t.&:'7 RALEIGH NC 2751 t-5807
172-4951146 NEW HOPE STORAGE LLC 3200 RtJGBY RD DURHAM NC 27707 -542'~
17249621}'&-~ P ARntt GLEN H 1012 FALLS BRIDGE DR RALEIGH NC 27614-89 3.5
·~\flLDERS GRD\fE ASS-OCIA TES POBOX¥A RALEIGH NC 27&!2..Q4.t4
17249580:;.f, W'lDEWATERS NEW' BERN CO LLC POB0Xfoo;)7 AT1....ANTA GA 30343-0007
1724968822 NE\i\! HOPE ROAD RALEIGH LLC POBOX~.J GRAHAM NC 27253--0057
173?05294E, VVIDEWATERS ~JEW BERN CO LLC PO BOXS5007 A TI.A.ITTA GA 30343-..fr007
17340321 '~j
COLUMBUS CLUB OF RALEIGH [NC 4301 COU.JMBUS CUJB DR RALEIGH NC 27604-11 ,57
1724873515 TRP,N, SUONG THI 1608 BEACON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NG :27604-8504
1724873637 MAY, MSIUCA B 1520 BE.~:CON VILLAGE DR RALEIGH NC 27604-8504
1724877985 ST MARKS PARRISH OF 1HE 1725 N NE'.\' HOPE RD P.AtElGH NG 27604-8304
1724[)52821 VT CHESAPEAKE VENTURES LLC cm JOHNSON PARKS & SCHERER .2515 FILBERT ST SAN FRANDSCO CAQ?.123-3:3 U
17249620{18 SPINX OIL COMPANY iit.JC POBOX862-4 GREHJV[LLE SC 2g.{04-B5.24
17249Bf,110 1/V!LDERS GROVE ASSOCIATES ATTN: STORE ACCOUmJ;NG 1 CVS DR# MC.2320 WOONSOCKET RI 028~5--6146
H.2496a:258 Ml..}RPHY {)IL USA I NC AD VALOREM TAX DEPT POBOX7300 EL DOR.l:..:DO AR 71731-7300
17249749:53 NE\\! HOPE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES LLC TTD6 .SIX fORJ::s RG P.Al.E!GH NC 27615-5067
1734050001 OREGF 20t 7 RUBY LLC OR !Of>t ~N\/ESTMHIT & MGMT LTD CORP 200 .S 6!.SCAYNE BLVD FL 7 Ml\.AMI FL~ 131-2310
EXHIBIT C - ITEMS DISCUSSED
1. Cu1Tent zoning, including frontage district 2. Impact of current -PK frontage district 3. Purpose of rezoning to change frontage district to -PL 4. Development plans after rezoning/reasons for rezoning
EXHIBIT D - MEETING ATTENDEES
1. Joan Davis 2. Iris King 3. Jamar McDuffie 4. Court Crosby 5. Kenneth Kinlaw 6. Jennifer Walker
Pre-Application Conference (this form must be provided at the time of formal submittal)
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
Development Services Customer Service Center [ 1 Exchange Plaza, Suite 400 I Raleigh, NC 27601 [ 919-996-2495 I efax 919-996-183 l
Litchford Satellite Office [ 8320- 130 Litchford Road I Raleigh, NC 27601 j 919-996-4200
D Board of Adjustment
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment
[ii Rezoning
D Site Review*
D Subdivision
D Subdivision (Exempt)
D Text Change
* Optional conference
Date Submitted 3/7 /18
PROCESS TYPE
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name Michael Birch, Morris, Russell, Eagle & Worley, PLLC
Applicant's Mailing Address2235 Gateway Access-Point, Suite 201, Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone 919-645-4317
Email [email protected]
Property Pl N # 1724-96-0124, 1724-86-8905, 1724-86-8153, and 1724-86-27 46
Site Address/ Location 0, 4111, and 4201 New Bern Avenue; 1412 Corporation Parkway
Current Zoning CX-3-PK
Additional Information (if needed) :
Proposed rezoning: CX-3-PL
OFFICE USE ONLY
Transaction#: 547418 Date of Pre-Application Conference :
Staff Signature
PAGE 1 OF 1 WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV REVISION 08.26.16
6/20/2018
AM peak trips (vph) PM peak trips (vph)247 656
AM peak trips (vph) PM peak trips (vph)1,328 1,720
AM peak trips (vph) PM peak trips (vph)1,328 1,720
AM peak trips (vph) PM peak trips (vph)0 0
6.23.4
A No
B No
C No
D No
E N/A
6.23.5
A Yes
B No?
C No
D No
E Yes
F No
G Yes
H No
I ?
6.23.6
A No
B No
There are no trips generated as a result of the proposed entitlment
Not Applicable
Meets TIA Conditions? (Y/N)
Daily Trips (vpd)7,260
Daily Trips (vpd)14,792
Z‐13‐18 Trip Volume Change(Proposed Maximums minus Current Entitlements)
Daily Trips (vpd)14,792
Daily Trips (vpd)
There are no trips generated as a result of the proposed entitlment
Peak Hour Trips ≥ 100 veh/hr if primary access is on a 2‐lane street
More than 100 veh/hr trips in the peak direction
Daily Trips ≥ 3,000 veh/day
On New Bern Ave and North New Hope Rd
Affects a location with a high crash history[Severity Index ≥ 8.4 or a fatal crash within the past three years]Takes place at a highly congested location[volume‐to‐capacity ratio ≥ 1.0 on both major street approaches]
Creates a fourth leg at an existing signalized intersection
Proposed access is within 1,000 feet of an interchange
There are also several nearby intersections that have high crash rates, although not necessarily severe
In response to Raleigh Planning Commission orRaleigh City Council resolutions
Involves an existing or proposed median crossover
Involves an active roadway construction project
Involves a break in controlled access along a corridor
Miscellaneous Applications
None noted as of May 18, 2018
Enrollment increases at public or private schools
Site Context
Exacerbates an already difficult situation such as a RR Crossing, Fire Station Access, School Access, etc.Access is to/from a Major Street as defined by the City's Street Plan MapMajor street ‐ avenue with more than 4 lanes or boulevard
Planned Development Districts
Meets TIA Conditions? (Y/N)
Z‐13‐18 Existing Land Use
Z‐13‐18 Proposed Zoning Maximums
Z‐13‐18 Current Zoning EntitlementsPartially Retail, Partially Undeveloped
Residential, Retail, Office
Peak Hour Trips ≥ 150 veh/hr
There are no trips generated as a result of the proposed entitlment
There are no trips generated as a result of the proposed entitlment
Residential, Retail, Office
0
Meets TIA Conditions? (Y/N)Z‐8‐2018 Traffic Study Worksheet
Trip Generation
ORDINANCE NO. (1988) 120 ZC 227 Effective: 2/2/88
1
Z-67-87 New Hope Road, east side, opposite Corporation Parkway, being a portion of Parcel 8, Tax Map 498, rezoned to Thoroughfare Conditional Use and Industrial-1 Conditional Use, according to map dated February 2, 1988, on file in the City of Raleigh Planning Department. Conditions: The owner would agree to dedicate the rights-of-way of Corporation Parkway extending eastward across the subject property and New Hope Road extending southwardly across the subject property as requested by the City of Raleigh DOT upon the consultation with the owners. The owners will not require any reimbursement for right-of-way only. Any residential use of Thoroughfare District property shall be limited to a maximum of 15 units per acres.
