6
Exercise 3’ Exercise 3’ Purpose: Compare unweighted internal and external absorbed dose rates assuming 1 Bq kg -1 in organism & 1 Bq unit -1 media respectively Radionuclides (n=74) considered – those from draft ICRP RAP report (+ 55 Fe) Did not include noble gases (Ar, Kr Rn) which had been requested by some

‘Exercise 3’

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Purpose: Compare unweighted internal and external absorbed dose rates assuming 1 Bq kg -1 in organism & 1 Bq unit -1 media respectively Radionuclides (n=74) considered – those from draft ICRP RAP report (+ 55 Fe) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Exercise 3’

‘‘Exercise 3’Exercise 3’

Purpose:Compare unweighted internal and external absorbed dose rates assuming 1 Bq kg-1 in organism & 1 Bq unit-1 media respectivelyRadionuclides (n=74) considered – those from draft ICRP RAP report (+55Fe)

Did not include noble gases (Ar, Kr Rn) which had been requested by some group members

Page 2: ‘Exercise 3’

Exercise 3Exercise 3Organism geometries taken from information supplied for ICRP RAPs to BWG Exercise 1 [need to check consistent with in-press report]:

Hmmmm –

Flatfish egg 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.19x10-6 kg

Page 3: ‘Exercise 3’

Exercise 3Exercise 3Exposure scenarios results requested for:

Page 4: ‘Exercise 3’

Model ParticipantRESRAD-BIOTA [‘basics’] Sunita Kamboj (ANL, USA)

RESRAD-BIOTA [available software] Mike Wood (Liverpool, UK)

EA R&D128 [‘basics’] Jordi Vives i Battle (WSC, UK)

EA R&D128 [available spreadsheets] Laura Newsome (EA, UK)

EA R&D128 [analogue approach] Laura Newsome (EA, UK)

EDEN Karine Beaugelin-Seiller (IRSN, France)

EPIC DOSES3D Ali Hosseini (NRPA, Norway)

ICRP RAP report Nick Beresford (CEH)

K-Biota Dong-Kwon Keum (KAERI)

SUJB Jan Horyna (SUJB)

VIC Susumu Ryufuku (VIC)

DosDimEco Geert Olyslaegers (SCK·CEN)

ERICA [default] Laura Newsome (EA)/Hildegarde Vandenhove (SCK·CEN)

ERICA [create organism] Mat Johansen (ANSTO)

Page 5: ‘Exercise 3’

Multiple runs of same modelMultiple runs of same model• RESRAD-BIOTA – results input using available

software tool where radionuclide included v’s more complete set of results submitted by ANL

• ‘ERICA’ – (i) two sets non-developer use of Tool default; non-developer ‘create organism’; (ii) ICRP RAP report, (iii) K-Biota, (iv) results using default values

• R&D128 – (i) available spreadsheets; (ii) underlying methodology; (iii) analogue approach

Page 6: ‘Exercise 3’

Model ParticipantRESRAD-BIOTA [‘basics’] Sunita Kamboj (ANL, USA)

EA R&D128 [‘basics’] Jordi Vives i Battle (WSC, UK)

EDEN Karine Beaugelin-Seiller (IRSN, France)

EPIC DOSES3D Ali Hosseini (NRPA, Norway)

SUJB Jan Horyna (SUJB)

VIC Susumu Ryufuku (VIC)

DosDimEco Geert Olyslaegers (SCK·CEN)

ERICA [default] Laura Newsome (EA)/Hildegarde Vandenhove (SCK·CEN)

For comparison all predictions normalised to ‘infinite dose rate’ for given RN-exposure scenario

Infinite dose rate estimated assuming inclusion of progeny with T1/2’s ≤ 20 d

Infinite dose rate is same for all geometries for given RN-exposure scenario