3
ESPHL PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS MINNESOTA July 2014 Team Members: Edward Ehlinger * Susan Allen Mona Dohman Chris Eaton Lucinda Jesson Jeremy Miller Manny Munson-Regala Nicholas Zerwas * Team Leader For additional information, contact: Manny Munson-Regala Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Health [email protected] States’ policies shape where we live, learn, work, and play, and impact the public’s health. While there is evidence for what works to improve populations’ health outcomes, many states lack robust partnerships capable of mobilizing stakeholders, re-examining existing legal models, and innovating through statue and regulation. The Excellence in State Public Health Law (ESPHL) program sought to strengthen the relationships among health policy decision-makers in and among selected states and to increase the ability of these states to understand how policy could improve the public’s health. States determined their own priorities, and ESPHL did not pre- determine states’ outcomes.

Excellence in State Public Health Law Minnesota Highlights

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

From the Aspen Institute Justice and Society Program

Citation preview

  • ESPHL PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

    MINNESOTA

    July 2014

    Team Members:

    Edward Ehlinger *

    Susan Allen

    Mona Dohman

    Chris Eaton

    Lucinda Jesson

    Jeremy Miller

    Manny Munson-Regala

    Nicholas Zerwas

    * Team Leader

    For additional information, contact:

    Manny Munson-Regala

    Assistant Commissioner

    Minnesota Department of Health

    [email protected]

    States policies shape where we live, learn, work, and play, and impact the publics health. While there is evidence

    for what works to improve populations health outcomes, many states lack robust partnerships capable of

    mobilizing stakeholders, re-examining existing legal models, and innovating through statue and regulation. The

    Excellence in State Public Health Law (ESPHL) program sought to strengthen the relationships among health

    policy decision-makers in and among selected states and to increase the ability of these states to understand how

    policy could improve the publics health. States determined their own priorities, and ESPHL did not pre-

    determine states outcomes.

  • Excessive alcohol use has a devastating impact on individuals, families, communities, and the Minnesota economy; these costs cut across state agencies and levels of government. Over the past several years, the Commissioner of the Department of Health has engaged in a dialogue with a number of partners in other agencies, the legislature, and the Governors office to see if there are some useful approaches to dealing with the problem of binge drinking that specifically make sense for Minnesota. Building on these conversations, the Excellence in State Public Health Law (ESPHL)* program provided a vehicle for the Minnesota team of commissioners, state legislators, and policy directors in the Governors office to accelerate the review of evidence of effective interventions, learn from Minnesota residents about their support of selected initiatives, discuss policy priorities, and consider the political feasibility of initiatives in an election year. The team identified the project goal: reducing binge drinking and its negative consequences in Minnesota using policies that impact cost, availability, marketing, drinking and driving, and treatment.

    Within the first six months of the project, the team was quickly able to review the research on effective policy interventions, use ESPHL technical assistance funds to conduct a statewide poll of Minnesota residents about their support of selected initiatives, weigh the political feasibility of various initiatives in an election year, and decide to focus on enhancing and expanding the use of ignition interlock. The Minnesota Team consisted of two senators (Chris Eaton and Jeremy Miller), two representatives (Susan Allen and Nick Zerwas), the governor's legislative director (Jamie Tincher), three commissioners (Ed Ehlinger, Department of Health, Lucinda Jesson, Department of Human Services, and Mona Dohman, Department of Public Safety), and the Minnesota Department of Health Assistant Commissioner (Manny Munson-Regala). The legislators were evenly represented between Republicans and Democrats. Our team members represented key state agencies impacted by binge drinking, and helped us assemble a multi-disciplinary team with different agency perspectives:

    * ESPHL, a program of the Aspen Institute Justice & Society Program, was made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

    I'm finding that in public

    health, we really need to

    change the narrative about

    what creates health. We have

    to change it from medical care

    and personal choices being the

    main drivers to the fact that it

    is policies and systems and the

    environment that has the

    greatest influence. Were doing

    that work to change the

    narrative about alcohol use in

    our state.

    - Dr. Edward Ehlinger,

    Commissioner,

    Minnesota

    Department of Health

  • Commissioner of Public Safety: law enforcement perspective, and part of the Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths effort to lower traffic fatalities.

    Commissioner of Human Services: the agency responsible for most of the prevention, early identification, and treatment of substance abuse; it is also the agency that most interacts with the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

    Commissioner of Health: population-based approach to health, with a prevention focus on policy, systems, and environmental change.

    Governors Office: policy expertise. One of our biggest successes was convening a diverse group of people who are knowledgeable about alcohol abuse and the difficulties of changing policies within the political climate of Minnesota. The team also had a much better idea of what public health can do, and hence will be champions of public health issues in future years. We are already seeing the results of that.

    Partnerships among team members have already facilitated collaborative work on other policy issues. Moreover, partnerships with members of other ESPHL state teams have broadened our views on how to address important public health problems. The time at the ESPHL retreats and meetings strengthened collaborations among state agencies and provided a unique opportunity to work with state legislators across party lines. Public health problems like binge drinking are often complex and intractable, and the ESPHL project provided a valuable opportunity to examine possible solutions, understand the unique

    contributions of different state agencies, engage new stakeholders, and develop new partnerships to work on a solution (alcohol ignition interlock policy in this case), which often requires as sustained effort longer than one year. Our work on utilizing ignition interlocks as part of a strategy to discourage binge drinking will continue beyond the ESPHL cohort period. What the legislators on our ESPHL team learned about other projects has helped shape their view of public health beyond just the issue of binge drinking. They have become better advocates of a public health approach to other issues in our state.

    ESPHL has applicability for almost

    any public policy that has some

    health impactsand there are very

    few public policies that dontso I

    think it should be replicated across

    the country on multiple issues.

    - Dr. Edward Ehlinger,

    Commissioner, Minnesota

    Department of Health