Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HAL Id: hal-02410979https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02410979
Submitted on 21 Sep 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open accessarchive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come fromteaching and research institutions in France orabroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documentsscientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,émanant des établissements d’enseignement et derecherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoirespublics ou privés.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License
Evolutionary perspectives on human infectious diseases:Challenges, advances, and promisesPierre Echaubard, James Rudge, Thierry Lefèvre
To cite this version:Pierre Echaubard, James Rudge, Thierry Lefèvre. Evolutionary perspectives on human infectiousdiseases: Challenges, advances, and promises. Evolutionary Applications, Blackwell, 2018, 11 (4),pp.383-393. �10.1111/eva.12586�. �hal-02410979�
Evolutionary Applications. 2018;11:383–393. | 383wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/eva
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12586
E D I T O R I A L
Evolutionary perspectives on human infectious diseases: Challenges, advances, and promises
1 | INTRODUC TION
Modern biomedicine has contributed remarkably to the reduction of infectious diseases worldwide, including the eradication of smallpox and the control of common childhood diseases (e.g., polio, measles, rubella) that once claimed millions of lives and caused suffering of tens of millions. This has been made possible through improved di-agnostics, surveillance, therapeutics, vaccines, and an associated health system infrastructure. These achievements can be largely credited to advances in biomedical sciences and their application in the 20th century.
The spectacular advances in the biomedical sciences were in turn a consequence of the emergence and widespread acceptance of the biomedical paradigm, in which the discovery of microbes and establishment of ‘germ theory’ had played a central role. By the 1960s, a sense began to prevail that infectious diseases had been conquered, or were at least conquerable in the case of malaria, den-gue, and other vector- borne diseases (VBD) that appeared to be “in retreat.”
Yet, by the 1980s, with the appearance of the HIV/AIDS pan-demic and followed by new antimicrobial- resistant strains of bacterial pathogens, confidence began to erode. Major setbacks also increasingly became apparent in the efforts to control VBDs particularly with the resurgence of malaria and dengue worldwide (WHO, 2016). An increasing number of historically localized or otherwise geographically confined VBDs began to spread and even jump continents, with the arrival of West Nile virus and Zika virus in the Americas being the most prominent of many examples. Such pathogens, identified decades ago in their native habitat and hosts as part of natural history studies, were long considered to be of relatively little public health concern or apparent impact (Lederberg, Shope, & Oaks, 1992; Packard, 2007).
Human population growth and anthropogenic environmental changes, accelerating with an unprecedented intensity and scale particularly since the mid- 1900s, are increasingly recognized as underlying much of the emerging infectious diseases (EID) prob-lem (Myers & Patz, 2009; Myers et al., 2013; Whitmee et al., 2015). These disease emergence drivers emblematic of the era of modern
development can be seen as consequences of modern medical and hygiene interventions introduced a century earlier. Together, they radically modified (and continue to alter) landscapes and ecosys-tems worldwide producing what has become a continual state of social, ecological, and evolutionary imbalance (McNeill, 1976). Among the environmental changes, global climate change has be-come widely accepted among experts as a significant contributor to these imbalances that will increasingly influence infectious dis-eases transmission, yet in ways that are difficult to predict (Altizer, Ostfeld, Johnson, Kutz, & Harvell, 2013; Lafferty, 2009; McMichael & Wilcox, 2009).
The complexity of factors and processes underlying infectious diseases and their transmission go well beyond the scope and an-alytic resolution of biomedicine (and conventional biomedical training), requiring a complementary framing approach capable of acknowledging and assessing cross- scale influences, context dependency, and the constant ‘arms race’ between co- evolving organisms (Van Valen, 1973). Evolutionary biology provides these scientific foundations to help refine our understanding of not only the meaning of health and disease (Stearns & Koella, 2008) from the standpoint of adaptation (or maladaptation), but also improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying infectious disease transmission dynamics within social- ecological systems (Horwitz & Wilcox, 2005; Wilcox & Echaubard, 2016), context- dependent virulence and more effective treatment and control strategies (Echaubard, Sripa, Mallory, & Wilcox, 2016; Nesse, 2008; Restif, 2009). As such, evolutionary biology as a framing approach and methodological toolkit is a needed component of integrated dis-ease control and prevention (Allegranzi et al., 2017) and sustainable health development aligning with the recently adopted sustain-able development goals (SDGs), as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Carroll et al., 2014).
This special issue is an attempt to present an up- to- date appraisal of the challenges, current advances, and promising research avenues where evolutionary principles and their ecological corollaries can be applied in research as a basis for human infectious disease in-terventions. Accordingly, the contributions published in this special issue together present an illustration of the diverse benefits of com-bining biomedical and public health perspectives with evolutionary
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.© 2018 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
384 | EDITORIAL
causation in the context of infectious diseases for major infectious agents (Table 1).
2 | THEMES OF THE SPECIAL ISSUE
A main challenge of mainstreaming evolution into medicine and public health lies in the often very pragmatic and urgent nature of these fields (e.g., outbreak mitigation; Nesse & Stearns, 2008) and the relatively time- consuming nature of framing questions, interven-tions, and policies following evolutionary principles, which imply a long- term preventive vision rather than a short- term curative do-main of action. However, policy- oriented research and intervention informed by evolutionary biology have the potential to not only ef-fectively mitigate urgent crises but also anticipate, minimize, and respond to the evolution of unwanted epidemiological traits (e.g., antimicrobial resistance). Accordingly, the articles compiled for this special issue present a selected panel of evolutionary applications for infectious disease control, together providing relevant avenues for future research and sustainable disease prevention strategies.
The articles published in this special issue are organized based on their underlying evolutionary innovation and public health implica-tions and not necessarily on the disease study systems the authors are using to address their research questions. A range of disease systems, from macroparasites to microparasites (sensu Anderson & May, 1981), are examined through modeling, experimental and observational research designs as well as describing novel framing approaches.
As an opening paper, Kosoy and Kosoy (2017) explore the mul-tiple dimensions and related complexity of host–pathogens interac-tions revealed by the novel genetic and genomic data, along with extensive environmental parameters being acquired using newly de-veloped computational tools. They highlight the need for flexibility in studying natural systems of zoonotic pathogens with respect to how we choose perspectives within a continuum between unrestricted diversity of related parameters and well- defined roles played by in-fectious agents, potential and actual animal hosts, and environmen-tal variables. They proposed a model of investigation that requires a dynamic shift of perspectives along the simplicity–complexity (‘sim-plexity’) dimension emphasizing the difficulty to accommodate dual representations of both the subjective nature of investigations of zoonotic pathogens and much more objectively derived information, for example, coded in the genetic structure of DNA or in observing the morphology or behavior of bacteria. This also speaks directly to the issue of “problem framing” alluded to in this introduction where tools and perceptions emerging from biomedical sciences do not necessarily accommodate evolutionary- based predictions or public health implications.
Arguably the most widespread recognition of the importance of evolutionary biology for public health and medicine is in the con-text of the emergence of resistance to antimicrobials and insecti-cides. Sternberg and Thomas (2017) explore the overlaps between understanding and managing insecticide resistance in agriculture
and in public health with the aim to identify best practices in resis-tance mitigation strategies in the context of vector- borne disease interventions. They argue that the success of insecticide resistance management strategies is strongly dependent on the biological spe-cifics of each system and that the biological, operational, and reg-ulatory differences between agriculture and public health limit the wholesale transfer of knowledge and practices from one system to the other. Nonetheless, the authors argue that there are some valuable insights from agriculture that could assist in advancing the existing Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management (IRM). Accordingly, the authors suggest that for IRM strategies to succeed in public health, there needs to be a shift away from choosing vector control tools or strategies based on direct cost, toward factoring in the benefit of preserving susceptibility.
Focusing on Malaria, Huijben and Paaijmans (2017) analyze the evolutionary consequences of the way antimalarial drugs and insecticide- based interventions are currently implemented, which is leading to resistance and may ultimately lead to control failure. The authors describe how evolutionary principles can be applied to extend the lifespan of current and novel interventions highlighting in particular how understanding fitness costs arising from express-ing, utilizing, and maintaining molecular or metabolic pathways of resistance will be essential to mitigate resistance evolution. They continue arguing that similar to insecticide resistance management strategies, large heterogeneity in drug exposure can be created in space (host mosaic) or time (drug rotation) or by deploying different compounds simultaneously (mixed treatment) and that better resis-tance management is achieved if drugs can be combined that select for alternative allelic versions of the target locus.
Glunt et al. (2017) further discuss the challenges of insecti-cide resistance in the context of malaria, with a specific focus on pyrethroids impregnated long- lasting insecticidal bed nets (LLINs) and their efficacy in preventing malaria. About 1 billion LLINs, a major vector control tool, have been distributed in Africa in the last 10 years. During the same period of time resistance to pyrethroids in malaria mosquito vectors has increased significantly. Using a trans-mission model, the authors show that when LLIN- related lethal and sublethal effects were accrued over mosquito lifetimes, they greatly reduced the impact of resistance on malaria transmission potential under conditions of high net coverage. However if coverage falls, the epidemiological impact is far more pronounced. Similarly, if the in-tensity of resistance intensifies, the loss of malaria control increases nonlinearly. The authors argue that their findings help explain why insecticide resistance has not yet led to wide- scale failure of LLINs, as high distribution coverage is generally in place in most African endemic countries, but reinforce the call for alternative control tools and informed resistance management strategies.
While parasites can evolve classical resistance mechanisms (e.g., efflux pumps), it is also possible that changes in life- history traits could help parasites evade the effects of treatment. Birget, Greischar, Reece, and Mideo (2017) investigate how the life history of malaria parasites is governed by an intrinsic resource allocation problem where specialized stages are required for transmission, but
| 385EDITORIAL
TABLE 1
Sum
mar
y of
pub
lic h
ealth
dat
a, re
gula
r dia
gnos
tic a
nd tr
eatm
ent,
mai
n co
ntro
l str
ateg
y as
wel
l as
chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
of t
he d
isea
se in
vest
igat
ed in
this
spe
cial
issu
e
Dis
ease
Publ
ic h
ealth
situ
atio
nD
iagn
ostic
& tr
eatm
ent
Cont
rol s
trat
egy
Chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
Mal
aria
a•
212
mill
ion
new
cas
es o
f mal
aria
wor
ldw
ide
in
2015
• Th
e W
HO
Afr
ican
Reg
ion
acco
unte
d fo
r mos
t gl
obal
cas
es o
f mal
aria
(90%
), fo
llow
ed b
y th
e So
uth-
East
Asi
a (S
EA) R
egio
n (7
%) a
nd th
e Ea
ster
n M
edite
rran
ean
Regi
on (2
%).
• In
201
5, th
ere
wer
e an
est
imat
ed 4
29 0
00
mal
aria
dea
ths
wor
ldw
ide
(Afr
ica
92%
, SEA
Re
gion
6%
, Med
iterr
anea
n Re
gion
2%
).•
Betw
een
2010
and
201
5, m
alar
ia in
cide
nce
rate
s fe
ll by
21%
glo
bally
and
in th
e A
fric
an R
egio
n.
Dur
ing
this
sam
e pe
riod,
mal
aria
mor
talit
y ra
tes
fell
by a
n es
timat
ed 2
9% g
loba
lly a
nd b
y 31
% in
th
e A
fric
an R
egio
n.•
Sinc
e 20
10, t
he m
alar
ia m
orta
lity
rate
dec
lined
by
58%
in th
e W
este
rn P
acifi
c Re
gion
, by
46%
in
the
SEA
Reg
ion,
by
37%
in th
e Re
gion
of t
he
Am
eric
as, a
nd b
y 6%
in th
e Ea
ster
n M
edite
rran
ean
Regi
on. I
n 20
15, t
he E
urop
ean
Regi
on w
as m
alar
ia fr
ee•
In 2
015,
mal
aria
kill
ed a
n es
timat
ed 3
03,0
00
unde
r-fiv
es g
loba
lly, i
nclu
ding
292
,000
in th
e A
fric
an R
egio
n. B
etw
een
2010
and
201
5, th
e m
alar
ia m
orta
lity
rate
am
ong
child
ren
unde
r 5
fell
by a
n es
timat
ed 3
5%. N
ever
thel
ess,
mal
aria
re
mai
ns a
maj
or k
iller
of u
nder
-fiv
es, c
laim
ing
the
life
of 1
chi
ld e
very
2 m
in.
• W
HO
reco
mm
ends
dia
gnos
tic te
stin
g fo
r all
peop
le w
ith s
uspe
cted
mal
aria
be
fore
trea
tmen
t is
adm
inis
tere
d.•
Rapi
d di
agno
stic
test
ing
(RD
Ts),
intr
oduc
ed w
idel
y ov
er th
e pa
st
deca
de, h
as m
ade
it ea
sier
to s
wift
ly
dist
ingu
ish
betw
een
mal
aria
l and
no
nmal
aria
l fev
ers,
ena
blin
g tim
ely
and
appr
opria
te tr
eatm
ent.
• In
201
5, a
ppro
xim
atel
y ha
lf (5
1%) o
f ch
ildre
n w
ith a
feve
r who
sou
ght c
are
at a
pub
lic h
ealth
faci
lity
in 2
2 A
fric
an
coun
trie
s re
ceiv
ed a
mal
aria
di
agno
stic
test
com
pare
d to
29%
in
2010
.•
Art
emis
inin
-bas
ed c
ombi
natio
n th
erap
ies
(AC
Ts) a
re h
ighl
y ef
fect
ive
agai
nst P
. fal
cipa
rum
, the
mos
t pr
eval
ent a
nd le
thal
mal
aria
par
asite
af
fect
ing
hum
ans.
• G
loba
lly, t
he n
umbe
r of A
CT
trea
tmen
t cou
rses
pro
cure
d fr
om
man
ufac
ture
rs in
crea
sed
from
187
m
illio
n in
201
0 to
a p
eak
of 3
93
mill
ion
in 2
013,
but
sub
sequ
ently
fell
to 3
11 m
illio
n in
201
5.
• Ve
ctor
con
trol
is th
e m
ain
way
to
prev
ent a
nd re
duce
mal
aria
tr
ansm
issi
on.
• Tw
o fo
rms
of v
ecto
r con
trol
are
ef
fect
ive
in a
wid
e ra
nge
of
circ
umst
ance
s: in
sect
icid
e-tr
eate
d m
osqu
ito n
ets
(ITN
s) a
nd in
door
re
sidu
al s
pray
ing
(IRS)
.•
Ove
r the
last
5 y
ears
, the
use
of
trea
ted
nets
in th
e re
gion
has
in
crea
sed
sign
ifica
ntly
: in
2015
, an
estim
ated
53%
of t
he p
opul
atio
n at
ris
k sl
ept u
nder
a tr
eate
d ne
t co
mpa
red
to 3
0% in
201
0.•
In 2
015,
106
mill
ion
peop
le g
loba
lly
wer
e pr
otec
ted
by IR
S, in
clud
ing
49
mill
ion
peop
le in
Afr
ica.
The
pr
opor
tion
of th
e po
pula
tion
at ri
sk
of m
alar
ia p
rote
cted
by
IRS
decl
ined
fr
om a
pea
k of
5.7
% g
loba
lly in
201
0 to
3.1
% in
201
5.
• A
rtem
isin
in re
sist
ance
mos
tly
in th
e M
ekon
g su
breg
ion,
at
Thai
land
–Mya
nmar
and
Th
aila
nd–C
ambo
dia
bord
ers.
• M
osqu
ito re
sist
ance
to
inse
ctic
ides
• C
ompo
sitio
n of
Ano
phel
es
spec
ies
com
plex
es h
ave
impo
rtan
t im
plic
atio
ns fo
r co
ntro
l str
ateg
ies
• Tr
ansb
ound
ary
labo
r mig
ratio
n•
Inte
nsiv
e ag
ricul
tura
l cro
ppin
g sy
stem
s, s
uch
as fr
uit o
rcha
rds,
in
crea
se th
e lik
elih
ood
of
inse
ctic
ide
resi
stan
ce
deve
lopm
ent i
n m
alar
ia
mos
quito
es
(Con
tinue
s)
386 | EDITORIAL
Dis
ease
Publ
ic h
ealth
situ
atio
nD
iagn
ostic
& tr
eatm
ent
Cont
rol s
trat
egy
Chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
Den
gueb
• O
ne re
cent
est
imat
e in
dica
tes
390
mill
ion
deng
ue in
fect
ions
per
yea
r (95
% c
redi
ble
inte
rval
28
4–52
8 m
illio
n), o
f whi
ch 9
6 m
illio
n (6
7–13
6 m
illio
n) m
anife
st c
linic
ally
• Th
e pr
eval
ence
of d
engu
e is
est
imat
ed a
t 3.9
bi
llion
peo
ple,
in 1
28 c
ount
ries,
at r
isk
of
infe
ctio
n w
ith d
engu
e vi
ruse
s•
The
num
ber o
f cas
es re
port
ed in
crea
sed
from
2.
2 m
illio
n in
201
0 to
3.2
mill
ion
in 2
015.
• Be
fore
197
0, o
nly
9 co
untr
ies
had
expe
rienc
ed
seve
re d
engu
e ep
idem
ics.
The
dis
ease
is n
ow
ende
mic
in m
ore
than
100
cou
ntrie
s in
the
WH
O
regi
ons
of A
fric
a, th
e A
mer
icas
, the
Eas
tern
M
edite
rran
ean,
SEA
, and
the
Wes
tern
Pac
ific.
• C
ases
acr
oss
the
Am
eric
as, S
outh
-Eas
t Asi
a, a
nd
Wes
tern
Pac
ific
exce
eded
1.2
mill
ion
in 2
008
and
over
3.2
mill
ion
in 2
015.
Rec
ently
, the
nu
mbe
r of r
epor
ted
case
s ha
s co
ntin
ued
to
incr
ease
. In
2015
, 2.3
5 m
illio
n ca
ses
of d
engu
e w
ere
repo
rted
in th
e A
mer
icas
alo
ne, o
f whi
ch
10,2
00 c
ases
wer
e di
agno
sed
as s
ever
e de
ngue
ca
usin
g 11
81 d
eath
s.•
An
estim
ated
500
,000
peo
ple
with
sev
ere
deng
ue re
quire
hos
pita
lizat
ion
each
yea
r, an
d ab
out 2
.5%
of t
hose
aff
ecte
d di
e.
• D
engu
e fe
ver i
s a
seve
re, f
lu-li
ke
illne
ss th
at a
ffec
ts in
fant
s, y
oung
ch
ildre
n, a
nd a
dults
• D
engu
e sh
ould
be
susp
ecte
d w
hen
a hi
gh fe
ver i
s ac
com
pani
ed b
y se
vere
he
adac
he, p
ain
behi
nd th
e ey
es,
mus
cle
and
join
t pai
ns, n
ause
a,
vom
iting
, sw
olle
n gl
ands
or r
ash.
• Se
vere
den
gue
is a
pot
entia
lly d
eadl
y co
mpl
icat
ion
due
to p
lasm
a le
akin
g,
fluid
acc
umul
atio
n, s
ever
e bl
eedi
ng, o
r or
gan
impa
irmen
t.•
Ther
e is
no
spec
ific
trea
tmen
t for
de
ngue
feve
r. M
aint
enan
ce o
f the
pa
tient
’s bo
dy fl
uid
volu
me
is c
ritic
al
to s
ever
e de
ngue
car
e.•
In la
te 2
015
and
early
201
6, th
e fir
st
deng
ue v
acci
ne, D
engv
axia
(CYD
-TD
V) b
y Sa
nofi
Past
eur,
was
re
gist
ered
in s
ever
al c
ount
ries
for u
se
in in
divi
dual
s 9–
45 y
ears
of a
ge li
ving
in
end
emic
are
as.
• W
HO
reco
mm
ends
that
cou
ntrie
s sh
ould
con
side
r int
rodu
ctio
n of
the
deng
ue v
acci
ne C
YD-T
DV
onl
y in
ge
ogra
phic
al s
ettin
gs w
here
ep
idem
iolo
gica
l dat
a in
dica
te a
hig
h bu
rden
of d
isea
se.
At p
rese
nt, t
he m
ain
met
hod
to c
ontr
ol
or p
reve
nt th
e tr
ansm
issi
on o
f de
ngue
viru
s is
to c
omba
t vec
tor
mos
quito
es th
roug
h:•
Prev
entin
g m
osqu
itoes
from
ac
cess
ing
egg-
layi
ng h
abita
ts b
y en
viro
nmen
tal m
anag
emen
t and
m
odifi
catio
n•
Dis
posi
ng o
f sol
id w
aste
and
co
verin
g, e
mpt
ying
, and
cle
anin
g of
do
mes
tic w
ater
sto
rage
con
tain
ers
on a
wee
kly
basi
s •
App
lyin
g ap
prop
riate
inse
ctic
ides
to
wat
er s
tora
ge o
utdo
or c
onta
iner
s an
d en
viro
nmen
tal m
anag
emen
t•
Usi
ng o
f per
sona
l hou
seho
ld
prot
ectio
n su
ch a
s w
indo
w s
cree
ns,
long
-sle
eved
clo
thes
, ins
ectic
ide-
trea
ted
mat
eria
ls, c
oils
, and
va
poriz
ers;
• Im
prov
ing
com
mun
ity p
artic
ipat
ion
and
mob
iliza
tion
for s
usta
ined
ve
ctor
con
trol
• In
crea
sing
pop
ulat
ion
mov
emen
t, gl
obal
izat
ion
of
trad
e an
d ur
bani
zatio
n w
ithou
t ad
equa
te m
easu
res
to p
reve
nt
vect
or b
reed
ing
• Ru
bber
pla
ntat
ions
exp
ansi
on•
Mos
quito
vec
tor a
nd p
atho
gen
adap
tatio
n
(Con
tinue
s)
TABLE 1
(Con
tinue
d)
| 387EDITORIAL
Dis
ease
Publ
ic h
ealth
situ
atio
nD
iagn
ostic
& tr
eatm
ent
Cont
rol s
trat
egy
Chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
Influ
enza
(z
oono
tic)
• H
uman
s ca
n be
infe
cted
with
avi
an, s
win
e, a
nd
othe
r zoo
notic
influ
enza
viru
ses,
suc
h as
avi
an
influ
enza
viru
s su
btyp
es A
(H5N
1), A
(H7N
9), a
nd
A(H
9N2)
and
sw
ine
influ
enza
viru
s su
btyp
es
A(H
1N1)
, A(H
1N2)
, and
A(H
3N2)
.•
The
maj
ority
of h
uman
cas
es o
f inf
luen
za A
(H
5N1)
and
A(H
7N9)
viru
s in
fect
ion
have
bee
n as
soci
ated
with
dire
ct o
r ind
irect
con
tact
with
in
fect
ed li
ve o
r dea
d po
ultr
y. C
ontr
ollin
g th
e di
seas
e in
the
anim
al s
ourc
e is
crit
ical
to
decr
ease
risk
to h
uman
s.•
Aqu
atic
bird
s ar
e th
e pr
imar
y na
tura
l res
ervo
ir fo
r mos
t sub
type
s of
influ
enza
A v
iruse
s. M
ost
caus
e as
ympt
omat
ic o
r mild
infe
ctio
n in
bird
s,
whe
re th
e ra
nge
of s
ympt
oms
depe
nds
on th
e vi
rus
prop
ertie
s.•
Viru
ses
that
cau
se s
ever
e di
seas
e in
pou
ltry
and
resu
lt in
hig
h de
ath
rate
s ar
e ca
lled
high
ly
path
ogen
ic a
vian
influ
enza
(HPA
I). V
iruse
s th
at
caus
e m
ild d
isea
se in
pou
ltry
are
calle
d lo
w-p
atho
geni
c av
ian
influ
enza
(LPA
I).
• Av
ian,
sw
ine,
and
oth
er z
oono
tic
influ
enza
viru
s in
fect
ions
in h
uman
s m
ay c
ause
dis
ease
rang
ing
from
mild
up
per r
espi
rato
ry tr
act i
nfec
tion
(feve
r and
cou
gh),
early
spu
tum
pr
oduc
tion,
and
rapi
d pr
ogre
ssio
n to
se
vere
pne
umon
ia, s
epsi
s w
ith s
hock
, ac
ute
resp
irato
ry d
istr
ess
synd
rom
e an
d ev
en d
eath
.•
Labo
rato
ry te
sts
are
requ
ired
to
diag
nose
hum
an in
fect
ion
with
zo
onot
ic in
fluen
za.
• Ra
pid
influ
enza
dia
gnos
tic te
sts
(RID
Ts) h
ave
low
er s
ensi
tivity
co
mpa
red
to P
CR
and
thei
r rel
iabi
lity
depe
nds
larg
ely
on th
e co
nditi
ons
unde
r whi
ch th
ey a
re u
sed.
• Ev
iden
ce s
ugge
sts
that
som
e an
tivira
l dr
ugs,
not
ably
neu
ram
inid
ase
inhi
bito
r (os
elta
miv
ir, z
anam
ivir)
, can
re
duce
the
dura
tion
of v
iral r
eplic
atio
n an
d im
prov
e pr
ospe
cts
of s
urvi
val;
how
ever
, ong
oing
clin
ical
stu
dies
are
ne
eded
.•
In s
uspe
cted
and
con
firm
ed c
ases
, ne
uram
inid
ase
inhi
bito
rs s
houl
d be
pr
escr
ibed
as
soon
as
poss
ible
to
max
imiz
e th
erap
eutic
ben
efits
.
• In
fluen
za v
iruse
s, w
ith th
e va
st
sile
nt re
serv
oir i
n aq
uatic
bird
s, a
re
impo
ssib
le to
era
dica
te.
• To
min
imiz
e pu
blic
hea
lth ri
sk,
qual
ity s
urve
illan
ce in
bot
h an
imal
an
d hu
man
pop
ulat
ions
, tho
roug
h in
vest
igat
ion
of e
very
hum
an
infe
ctio
n an
d ris
k-ba
sed
pand
emic
pl
anni
ng a
re e
ssen
tial.
• A
part
from
ant
ivira
l tre
atm
ent,
the
publ
ic h
ealth
man
agem
ent
incl
udes
per
sona
l pro
tect
ive
mea
sure
s lik
e re
gula
r han
d w
ashi
ng,
good
resp
irato
ry h
ygie
ne a
nd e
arly
se
lf-is
olat
ion
of th
ose
feel
ing
unw
ell,
feve
rish
and
havi
ng o
ther
sy
mpt
oms
of in
fluen
za.
• Pr
e-ex
posu
re o
r pos
texp
osur
e pr
ophy
laxi
s w
ith a
ntiv
irals
is
poss
ible
but
dep
ends
on
seve
ral
fact
ors,
for e
xam
ple,
indi
vidu
al
fact
ors,
type
of e
xpos
ure,
and
risk
as
soci
ated
with
the
expo
sure
.
• In
tern
atio
nal m
ovem
ent o
f st
rain
s•
Gen
etic
reas
sort
men
ts•
Emer
genc
e of
ose
ltam
ivir
resi
stan
ce h
as b
een
repo
rted
.•
Mos
t rec
ent A
(H5)
and
A
(H7N
9) v
iruse
s ar
e re
sist
-an
t to
adam
anta
ne a
ntiv
iral
drug
s (e
.g.,
aman
tadi
ne a
nd
riman
tadi
ne) a
nd a
re th
eref
ore
not r
ecom
men
ded
for
mon
othe
rapy
.
(Con
tinue
s)
TABLE 1
(Con
tinue
d)
388 | EDITORIAL
Dis
ease
Publ
ic h
ealth
situ
atio
nD
iagn
ostic
& tr
eatm
ent
Cont
rol s
trat
egy
Chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
Cha
gas
dise
asec
• C
haga
s di
seas
e, a
lso
know
n as
Am
eric
an
tryp
anos
omia
sis,
is a
pot
entia
lly li
fe-t
hrea
teni
ng
illne
ss c
ause
d by
the
prot
ozoa
n pa
ra-
site
Try
pano
som
a cr
uzi (
T. c
ruzi)
.•
Abo
ut 6
mill
ion
to 7
mill
ion
peop
le w
orld
wid
e ar
e es
timat
ed to
be
infe
cted
with
Try
pans
osom
a cr
uzi.
• C
haga
s di
seas
e is
foun
d m
ainl
y in
end
emic
are
as
of 2
1 La
tin A
mer
ican
cou
ntrie
s, w
here
it is
m
ostly
vec
tor-
born
e tr
ansm
itted
to h
uman
s by
co
ntac
t with
fece
s or
urin
e of
tria
tom
ine
bugs
• C
haga
s di
seas
e oc
curs
prin
cipa
lly in
the
cont
inen
tal p
art o
f Lat
in A
mer
ica
and
not i
n th
e C
arib
bean
isle
s. In
the
past
dec
ades
, how
ever
, it
has
been
incr
easi
ngly
det
ecte
d in
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f Am
eric
a, C
anad
a, a
nd m
any
Euro
pean
an
d so
me
Wes
tern
Pac
ific
coun
trie
s. T
his
is d
ue
mai
nly
to p
opul
atio
n m
obili
ty b
etw
een
Latin
A
mer
ica
and
the
rest
of t
he w
orld
.
• C
haga
s di
seas
e ca
n be
trea
ted
with
be
nzni
dazo
le a
nd a
lso
nifu
rtim
ox.
• Bo
th m
edic
ines
are
alm
ost 1
00%
ef
fect
ive
in c
urin
g th
e di
seas
e if
give
n so
on a
fter
infe
ctio
n at
the
onse
t of
the
acut
e ph
ase
incl
udin
g th
e ca
ses
of
cong
enita
l tra
nsm
issi
on. T
he e
ffic
acy
of b
oth
dim
inis
hes,
how
ever
, the
lo
nger
a p
erso
n ha
s be
en in
fect
ed.
• Th
e po
tent
ial b
enef
its o
f med
icat
ion
in p
reve
ntin
g or
del
ayin
g th
e de
velo
pmen
t of C
haga
s di
seas
e sh
ould
be
wei
ghed
aga
inst
the
long
du
ratio
n of
trea
tmen
t (up
to 2
mon
ths)
an
d po
ssib
le a
dver
se re
actio
ns
(occ
urrin
g in
up
to 4
0% o
f tre
ated
pa
tient
s).
• Th
e co
st o
f tre
atm
ent f
or C
haga
s di
seas
e re
mai
ns s
ubst
antia
l. In
C
olom
bia
alon
e, th
e an
nual
cos
t of
med
ical
car
e fo
r all
patie
nts
with
the
dise
ase
was
est
imat
ed to
be
abou
t US
267
mill
ion
in 2
008.
Spr
ayin
g in
sect
icid
e to
con
trol
vec
tors
wou
ld
cost
nea
rly U
S 5
mill
ion
annu
ally
—le
ss
than
2%
of t
he m
edic
al c
are
cost
.•
Ther
e is
no
vacc
ine
for C
haga
s di
seas
e.
• Ve
ctor
con
trol
is th
e m
ost e
ffec
tive
met
hod
of p
reve
ntio
n in
Lat
in
Am
eric
a. B
lood
scr
eeni
ng is
ne
cess
ary
to p
reve
nt in
fect
ion
thro
ugh
tran
sfus
ion
and
orga
n tr
ansp
lant
atio
n.•
The
cont
rol t
arge
ts a
re e
limin
atio
n of
the
tran
smis
sion
and
ear
ly
heal
thca
re a
cces
s fo
r the
infe
cted
an
d ill
pop
ultio
n.•
Dep
endi
ng o
n th
e ge
ogra
phic
al
area
, WH
O re
com
men
ds th
e fo
llow
ing
appr
oach
es to
pre
vent
ion
and
cont
rol:
o S
pray
ing
of h
ouse
s an
d su
rrou
ndin
g ar
eas
with
resi
dual
in
sect
icid
eso
Hou
se im
prov
emen
ts a
nd h
ouse
cl
eanl
ines
s to
pre
vent
vec
tor
infe
stat
ion;
o B
edne
ts
• Ps
ycho
-soc
ial c
halle
nges
suc
h as
stig
ma
rela
ted
to p
over
ty
and
emot
iona
l fea
rs o
f bei
ng
judg
ed le
adin
g to
low
repo
rtin
g an
d sc
reen
ing
• In
crea
sing
inse
ctic
ide
resi
stan
ce o
f Tria
tom
ine
vect
ors
and
rapi
d re
colo
nisa
-tio
n of
hou
seho
lds
by v
ecto
rs
afte
r spr
ayin
g•
Dia
gnos
is
(Con
tinue
s)
TABLE 1
(Con
tinue
d)
| 389EDITORIAL
Dis
ease
Publ
ic h
ealth
situ
atio
nD
iagn
ostic
& tr
eatm
ent
Cont
rol s
trat
egy
Chal
leng
es fo
r con
trol
Schi
stos
omia
sisd
• Sc
hist
osom
iasi
s is
an
acut
e an
d ch
roni
c pa
rasi
tic
dise
ase
caus
ed b
y bl
ood
fluke
s (tr
emat
ode
wor
ms)
of t
he g
enus
Sch
istos
oma.
• Es
timat
es s
how
that
at l
east
206
.4 m
illio
n pe
ople
re
quire
d pr
even
tive
trea
tmen
t in
2016
.•
Schi
stos
omia
sis
tran
smis
sion
has
bee
n re
port
ed
from
78
coun
trie
s. H
owev
er, p
reve
ntiv
e ch
emot
hera
py fo
r sch
isto
som
iasi
s, w
here
peo
ple
and
com
mun
ities
are
targ
eted
for l
arge
-sca
le
trea
tmen
t, is
onl
y re
quire
d in
52
ende
mic
co
untr
ies
with
mod
erat
e-to
-hig
h tr
ansm
issi
on.
• Sc
hist
osom
iasi
s is
pre
vale
nt in
trop
ical
and
su
btro
pica
l are
as, e
spec
ially
in p
oor c
omm
uniti
es
with
out a
cces
s to
saf
e dr
inki
ng w
ater
and
ad
equa
te s
anita
tion.
It is
est
imat
ed th
at a
t lea
st
91.4
% o
f tho
se re
quiri
ng tr
eatm
ent f
or
schi
stos
omia
sis
live
in A
fric
a.•
Ther
e ar
e 2
maj
or fo
rms
of s
chis
toso
mia
sis—
in-
test
inal
and
uro
geni
tal—
caus
ed b
y 5
mai
n sp
ecie
s of
blo
od fl
uke.
• Sc
hist
osom
iasi
s m
ostly
aff
ects
poo
r and
rura
l co
mm
uniti
es, p
artic
ular
ly a
gric
ultu
ral a
nd fi
shin
g po
pula
tions
. Wom
en d
oing
dom
estic
cho
res
in
infe
sted
wat
er, s
uch
as w
ashi
ng c
loth
es, a
re a
lso
at ri
sk a
nd c
an d
evel
op fe
mal
e ge
nita
l sc
hist
osom
iasi
s.
• Sc
hist
osom
iasi
s is
dia
gnos
ed th
roug
h th
e de
tect
ion
of p
aras
ite e
ggs
in s
tool
or
urin
e sp
ecim
ens.
Ant
ibod
ies
and/
or
antig
ens
dete
cted
in b
lood
or u
rine
sam
ples
are
als
o in
dica
tions
of
infe
ctio
n.•
For u
roge
nita
l sch
isto
som
iasi
s, a
fil
trat
ion
tech
niqu
e us
ing
nylo
n, p
aper
, or
pol
ycar
bona
te fi
lters
is th
e st
anda
rd d
iagn
ostic
tech
niqu
e.
Chi
ldre
n w
ith S
. hae
mat
obiu
m a
lmos
t al
way
s ha
ve m
icro
scop
ic b
lood
in th
eir
urin
e, w
hich
can
be
dete
cted
by
chem
ical
reag
ent s
trip
s.•
The
eggs
of i
ntes
tinal
sch
isto
som
iasi
s ca
n be
det
ecte
d in
feca
l spe
cim
ens
thro
ugh
a te
chni
que
usin
g m
ethy
lene
bl
ue-s
tain
ed c
ello
phan
e so
aked
in
glyc
erin
or g
lass
slid
es, k
now
n as
the
Kat
o-K
atz
tech
niqu
e.
• Th
e co
ntro
l of s
chis
toso
mia
sis
is
base
d on
larg
e-sc
ale
trea
tmen
t of
at-r
isk
popu
latio
n gr
oups
, acc
ess
to
safe
wat
er, i
mpr
oved
san
itatio
n,
hygi
ene
educ
atio
n, a
nd s
nail
cont
rol.
• Th
e W
HO
str
ateg
y fo
r sch
isto
so-
mia
sis
cont
rol f
ocus
es o
n re
duci
ng
dise
ase
thro
ugh
perio
dic,
targ
eted
tr
eatm
ent w
ith p
razi
quan
tel t
hrou
gh
the
larg
e-sc
ale
trea
tmen
t (pr
even
-tiv
e ch
emot
hera
py) o
f aff
ecte
d po
pula
tions
.•
It in
volv
es re
gula
r tre
atm
ent o
f all
at-r
isk
grou
ps. I
n a
few
cou
ntrie
s,
whe
re th
ere
is lo
w tr
ansm
issi
on, t
he
inte
rrup
tion
of th
e tr
ansm
issi
on o
f th
e di
seas
e sh
ould
be
aim
ed fo
r.
• En
viro
nmen
tal d
egra
datio
n•
Dam
s an
d la
rge-
scal
e irr
igat
ion
proj
ect t
hat c
ontr
ibut
e to
sna
il in
term
edia
te h
ost p
rolif
erat
ion
• A
nim
al re
serv
oirs
• Po
tent
ial f
or p
razi
quan
tel
resi
stan
ce
a WH
O (2
016)
.b Bh
att e
t al.
(201
3); B
rady
et a
l. (2
012)
.c Ta
rleto
n, R
eith
inge
r, U
rbin
a, K
itron
, and
Gür
tler (
2007
).d W
orld
Hea
lth O
rgan
izat
ion
& U
NIC
EF (2
004)
.
TABLE 1
(Con
tinue
d)
390 | EDITORIAL
producing these stages comes at the cost of producing fewer of the forms required for within- host survival. The underlying rationale is that drug treatment, by design, alters the probability of within- host survival and so should alter the costs and benefits of investing in transmission. The authors use a within- host model of malaria infec-tion to predict optimal patterns of investment in transmission in the face of different drug treatment regimens and determine the extent to which alternative patterns of investment can buffer the fitness loss due to drugs. This work emphasizes that in addition to classical resistance mechanisms, drug treatment generates selection for al-tered parasite life history. It also suggests that understanding how any shifts in life history will alter the efficacy of drugs, as well as any limitations on such shifts, is important for evaluating and predicting the consequences of drug treatment.
While evolutionary principles can help design more sustain-able insecticide and antimicrobial resistance mitigation strategies, evaluating the risk of emergence and transmission of vector- borne diseases also requires knowledge of the genetic and environmental contributions to pathogen transmission traits. In their perspective article, Lefevre et al. (2017) discuss how the associations between malaria parasites transmission traits and their related trade- offs and constraints could have important implications for understanding the evolution of parasite transmission and how so doing could inform disease control. For instance, they argue, frontline vector- borne disease prevention tools such as insecticide- treated bednets and in-door residual spraying rely on reducing mosquito contact rates with human hosts and reducing vector survival. Reduced vector survival has the benefits of decreasing mosquito abundance, the number of bites a mosquito can take over the course of its lifetime, and the probability that mosquitoes survive past the parasite’s development time. These effects likely shape the selective environment for para-sites within the vector. However, whether parasites can respond to interventions by evolving shorter EIPs or other heritable extended phenotypes that lengthen mosquito survival or change vector be-havior merit further investigation.
As in the case of malaria described by Lefevre et al. (2017), life- history trait evolution theory and its attributes can help better un-derstand the adaptive potential of triatomines—the vector of Chagas disease. The review by Flores- Ferrer, Marcou, Waleckx, Dumonteil, and Gourbière (2017) suggests that current knowledge of the deter-minants of high diversity and low virulence of the Trypanosoma cruzi parasite remains too limiting to design evolution- proof strategies, while such attributes may be part of the future of Chagas disease control after the 2020 WHO’s target of regional elimination of intra-domiciliary transmission has been reached. The authors argue that the eco- epidemiological relationships that build- up the selective pressures at work have been assiduously studied over the last cen-tury, so that, combined with concepts and modeling inspired from life- history evolution, a good evolutionary understanding could be rapidly gained. Although more specific information will surely be needed, the authors suggest that an effective research strategy would be to integrate data into the conceptual and theoretical frame-work of evolutionary ecology and life- history evolution to provide
the quantitative backgrounds necessary to understand and possibly anticipate adaptive responses to public health interventions.
Public health interventions targeting helminth diseases often rely on mass drug administration to reduce human morbidity and mortality. Considering the frequency of such interventions and the strength of the selective pressure they impose, the emergence and spread of drug resistance is a concern. In the case of schistosomiasis, although hotspots of reduced efficacy of the drug praziquantel have been reported, resistance is not widespread. However, parasite pop-ulations often exhibit considerable genetic variability in their natural tolerance, or acquired resistance, to drugs which, as Viana, Faust, Haydon, Webster, and Lamberton (2017) emphasize, is related to the fitness costs associated with such resistance compared to suscepti-ble lines. Using Bayesian state- space models (SSMs) fitted to data from an in vivo laboratory system, the authors tested the hypothesis that the spread of resistant Schistosoma mansoni may be limited by life- history costs not present in susceptible counterparts. S. mansoni parasites from a praziquantel- susceptible (S), a praziquantel- resistant (R) or a mixed line of originally resistant and susceptible parasites (RS) were exposed to a range of praziquantel doses. Results showed that parasite adult worm survival and fecundity in the mu-rine host decreased across all lines, including R, with increasing drug pressure. The authors also observed trade- offs between adult sur-vival and fecundity in all untreated lines, and these remained strong in S with praziquantel pressure. In contrast, trade- offs between adult survival and fecundity were lost under praziquantel pressure in R. Additionally the authors showed that life- history traits within the molluscan intermediate host were complex, but trade- offs were demonstrated between parasite establishment and cercarial output. These results have theoretical and applied implications and appli-cations for future schistosomiasis control programs and for other host–parasite treatment programs in general.
Complementing the work by Viana et al., 2017; Borlase, Webster, and Rudge (2017) present the case example of haematobium group Schistosoma spp. hybrids in West Africa, a system involving multiple interacting parasites and multiple definitive hosts, in a region where zoonotic reservoirs of schistosomiasis were not previously consid-ered to be of importance. The authors consider how existing math-ematical model frameworks for schistosome transmission could be expanded and adapted to zoonotic hybrid systems, exploring how such model frameworks can utilize molecular and epidemiological data, as well as the complexities and challenges this presents. The authors also highlight the opportunities and value such mathematical models could bring to this and a similar multihost, multiparasite sys-tems, including informing priorities for data collection, diagnostics and laboratory studies and exploring the impact that hybridizations may have on control measures, as well the impact that evolutionary pressures including control measures may have on driving the emer-gence and spread of parasite hybrids.
Evolutionary- based mathematical modeling is also increasingly used to enhance both understanding and design of integrated inter-vention in the context of microparasites such as Dengue. Lourenço et al. (2017) review and analyze the biological and epidemiological
| 391EDITORIAL
background of dengue, together with the major achievements of computational approaches including highlighting critical knowl-edge gaps and research underachievements that call for an urgent renewed focus. The authors argue that possible advancements based on new processing strategies, including real- time computa-tional analysis of genetic data, phylodynamic modeling frameworks, within- host model frameworks and GPU accelerated computing al-ready implemented for other pathogens, are already at reach of the Dengue research community. These new approaches are expected to make a significant contribution to our understanding of the evo-lutionary ecology and immunology of the dengue virus and support the design of novel integrated control strategies adaptable to other microparasite systems such as avian influenza affecting domestic animals and humans alike.
Influenza pandemics represent a significant threat to global public health. Four major pandemics have been recorded since the 1900s, occurring in 1918, 1957, 1968, and 2009 when influenza A vi-ruses with genes from animal sources adapted to the human popula-tion, a process known as antigenic shift. The H1N1/2009 pandemic virus emerged from swine that contained gene segments ultimately derived from previously circulating human and avian viruses, high-lighting a key role of segmental reassortment of genes from multiple hosts for host adaption and pandemic emergence. In this context, Joseph, Vijaykrishna, Smith, and Su (2017) used a relaxed molec-ular clock model to test whether the European avian- like swine (EA- swine) influenza virus originated through the introduction of a single avian ancestor as an entire genome, followed by an analysis of host- specific selection pressures among different gene segments. The results indicate independent introduction of gene segments via transmission of avian viruses into swine followed by reassort-ment events that occurred at least 1–4 years prior to the EA- swine outbreak. All EA- swine gene segments exhibited greater selection pressure than avian viruses, reflecting both adaptive pressures and relaxed selective constraints that are associated with host switching. Key amino acid mutations in the viral surface proteins (H1 and N1) that play a role in adaptation to new hosts were also observed sug-gesting adaptive changes in viral genomes following the transmis-sion of avian influenza viruses to swine and the early establishment of the EA- swine lineage.
Complementing the work by Joseph et al., 2017; Grear, Hall, Dusek, and Ip (2017) investigated mechanisms of intercontinental highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) spread through wild bird reservoirs possibly related to the North America outbreak in 2014. This introduction resulted in several reassortment events with North American (NA) lineage low- pathogenic avian influenza viruses and the reassortant EA/NA H5N2 that went on to cause one of the largest HPAIV poultry outbreaks in North America. In their research article, the authors used a time- rooted phylodynamic model that explicitly incorporated viral population dynamics with evolutionary dynamics to estimate the basic reproductive number (R0) and viral migration among host types in domestic and wild birds, as well as between the EA H5N8 and EA/NA H5N2 in wild birds. While the authors did not find evidence to support the hypothesis
that transmission of novel HPAIVs in wild birds was restricted by mechanisms associated with highly pathogenic phenotypes or that the HPAIV poultry outbreak was self- sustaining and required viral input from wild birds, the model estimates of the transmission pa-rameters suggested that the HPAIV outbreak met or exceeded the thresholdforpersistenceinwildbirds(R0>1)andpoultry(R0≈1).Overall, the results of this work suggest that this novel HPAIV and reassortments did not encounter any transmission barriers sufficient to prevent persistence when introduced to wild or domestic birds and highlight the relevance of phylodynamic methods to test hy-potheses about geographical spread of AIVs in wild birds, multiyear evolutionary processes of AIVs in reservoir hosts and relative fitness of highly pathogenic versus low- pathogenic AIVs in wild birds for more integrated surveillance systems.
3 | CLOSING REMARKS: E VOLUTION, ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT, AND SUSTAINABLE HE ALTH DE VELOPMENT
While disease control and prevention have achieved great successes, the paradigm within which it has been developed, including our un-derstanding of host–parasite relationships, infection, and disease, as well as best management practices, arguably is not enough. A major shortcoming is that the solutions it provides, often grounded in the curative domain, are not lasting. Evolutionary thinking applied to medical and public health problems promises to substitute the short- sighted use of drugs with sustainable solutions: If we cannot eradicate infections by frontal assault, we may be able to keep them at bay durably provided we can understand the fundamental nature of host–parasite relationships.
The evolutionary perspective asks ultimate questions, which are about why mechanisms or epidemiological phenotypes are the way they are (i.e., how has this mechanism given a selective advantage? what is the evolutionary history of this mechanism?). Most medical research and perspectives focus on proximal questions, questions about the mechanisms themselves (i.e., how does the mechanism work, what is the ontogeny of the mechanisms?). The distinction be-tween proximate (mechanistic) and ultimate (evolutionary) explana-tions was emphasized and formalized several decades ago but remain unfamiliar to the medical sciences and public health domain despite its epistemological importance (Nesse, 2013). Both types of expla-nations are necessary, neither substitutes for the other, and they in-form each other (Nesse, 2013; Nesse & Stearns, 2008). Incorporating evolutionary thinking in infectious disease research helps improving our understanding of diseases transmission dynamics, infection pat-terns, and disease manifestation trends by superimposing a context- dependent, systems dynamics prism that appreciates that organisms and their interactions are in constant flux (Levin, 1998). Accordingly, evolutionary biology can help identify new relevant questions such as the ones addressed in this special issue, and doing so, can help inform more integrated disease control interventions as well as more adaptive health management strategies.
392 | EDITORIAL
Adaptive health management, standing on strong evolutionary foundations, has the potential to address two fundamental errors underpinning most current public health interventions targeting in-fectious diseases. The first error is often the implicit assumption that pathogens or parasite responses to human intervention and/or that human–parasite/pathogens interactions are linear, predictable, and controllable. The second error is the assumption that pathogens and parasites can be treated independently of the social- ecological sys-tem within which they evolve (Horwitz & Wilcox, 2005). By explicitly avoiding these errors, evolutionary- based adaptive health manage-ment could help strengthen the representation of the operational concept of resilience in public health and restore the health systems capacity to buffer infectious and noninfectious challenges, learn, and develop—as a framework for understanding how to sustain and enhance adaptive capacity in a complex world of rapid transforma-tions (Folke et al., 2002).
ACKNOWLEDG EMENTS
The authors wish to thank Serge Morand and Bruce A. Wilcox for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts.
Pierre Echaubard1,2
James W. Rudge3,4
Thierry Lefevre5,6
1Global Health Asia Institute, Faculty of Public Health Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada3Department of Global Health and Development, London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK4Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
5Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
6MIVEGEC, IRD, CNRS, University. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
R E FE R E N C E S
Allegranzi, B., Kilpatrick, C., Storr, J., Kelley, E., Park, B. J., & Donaldson, L. (2017). Global infection prevention and control priorities 2018–22: A call for action. The Lancet Global Health, 5, e1178–e1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30427-8
Altizer, S., Ostfeld, R. S., Johnson, P. T. J., Kutz, S., & Harvell, C. D. (2013). Climate change and infectious diseases: from evidence to a predic-tive framework. Science, 341, 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239401
Anderson, R. M., & May, R. M. (1981). The population dynamics of micro-parasites and their invertebrate hosts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 291, 451–524. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1981.0005
Bhatt, S., Gething, P. W., Brady, O. J., Messina, J. P., Farlow, A. W., Moyes, C. L., … Hay, S. I. (2013). The global distribution and burden of den-gue. Nature, 496, 504–507.
Birget, P. L. G., Greischar, M. A., Reece, S. E., & Mideo, N. (2017). Altered life history strategies protect malaria parasites against drugs. Evolutionary Application, 11, 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12516
Borlase, A., Webster, J. P., & Rudge, J. W. (2017). Opportunities and chal-lenges for modelling epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics in a
multihost, multiparasite system: Zoonotic hybrid schistosomiasis in West Africa. Evolutionary Application, 11, 501–515. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/eva.12529
Brady, O. J., Gething, P. W., Bhatt, S., Messina, J. P., Brownstein, J. S., Hoen, A. G., … Hay, S. I. (2012). Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence- based consensus. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 6, e1760.
Carroll, S. P., Jørgensen, P. S., Kinnison, M. T., Bergstrom, C. T., Denison, R. F., Gluckman, P., … Tabashnik, B. E. (2014). Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges. Science, 346, 1245993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245993
Echaubard, P., Sripa, B., Mallory, F. F., & Wilcox, B. A. (2016). The role of evolutionary biology in research and control of liver flukes in Southeast Asia. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 43, 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.05.019
Flores-Ferrer, A., Marcou, O., Waleckx, E., Dumonteil, E., & Gourbière, S. (2017). Evolutionary ecology of Chagas disease; what do we know and what do we need?. Evolutionary Application, 11, 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12582
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO Journal of the Human Environment, 31, 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
Glunt, K. D., Coetzee, M., Huijben, S., Koffi, A. A., Lynch, P. A., N’Guessan, R., … Thomas, M. B. (2017). Empirical and theoret-ical investigation into the potential impacts of insecticide re-sistance on the effectiveness of insecticide- treated bed nets. Evolutionary Application, 11, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/ eva.12574
Grear, D. A., Hall, J. S., Dusek, R. J., & Ip, H. S. (2017). Inferring epide-miologic dynamics from viral evolution: 2014–2015 Eurasian/North American highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses exceed transmis-sion threshold, R0 = 1, in wild birds and poultry in North America. Evolutionary Application, 11, 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12 576
Horwitz, P., & Wilcox, B. A. (2005). Parasites, ecosystems and sustain-ability: An ecological and complex systems perspective. International Journal for Parasitology, 35, 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.03.002
Huijben, S., & Paaijmans, K. P. (2017). Putting evolution in elimination: Winning our ongoing battle with evolving malaria mosquitoes and parasites. Evolutionary Application, 11, 415–430. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/eva.12530
Joseph, U., Vijaykrishna, D., Smith, G. J. D., & Su, Y. C. F. (2017). Adaptive evolution during the establishment of European avian- like H1N1 influenza A virus in swine. Evolutionary Applications, 11, 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12536n/a–n/a.
Kosoy, M., & Kosoy, R. (2017). Complexity and biosemiotics in evolution-ary ecology of zoonotic infectious agents. Evolutionary Applications, 11, 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12503
Lafferty, K. D. (2009). The ecology of climate change and infec-tious diseases. Ecology, 90, 888–900. https://doi.org/10.1890/ 08-0079.1
Lederberg, J., Shope, R. E., & Oaks, S. C. (1992). Emerging Infections: Microbial Threats to Health in the United States. Washington: National Academies Press.
Lefevre, T., Ohm, J., Dabiré, K. R., Cohuet, A., Choisy, M., Thomas, M. B., & Cator, L. (2017). Transmission traits of malaria parasites within the mosquito: Genetic variation, phenotypic plasticity, and conse-quences for control. Evolutionary Application, 11, 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12571
Levin, S. A. (1998). Ecosystems and the biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems. Ecosystems, 1, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100219900037
| 393EDITORIAL
Lourenço, J., Tennant, W., Faria, N. R., Walker, A., Gupta, S., & Recker, M. (2017). Challenges in dengue research: A computational perspective. Evolutionary Application, 11, 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva. 12554
McMichael, A. J., & Wilcox, B. A. (2009). Climate Change, Human Health, and Integrative Research: A Transformative Imperative. EcoHealth, 6, 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-009-0262-9
McNeill, W. H. (1976). Plagues and peoples. New York: Anchor Press.Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., Redford, H.,
Ricketts, K. H. T., … Osofsky, S. A. (2013). Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 18753–18760. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218656110
Myers, S. S., & Patz, J. A. (2009). Emerging Threats to Human Health from Global Environmental Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.033108.102650
Nesse, R. (2008). What evolutionary biology offers public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 83. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.00.00000
Nesse, R. M. (2013). Tinbergen’s four questions, organized: A response to Bateson and Laland. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.10.008
Nesse, R. M., & Stearns, S. C. (2008). The great opportunity: Evolutionary applications to medicine and public health: Evolutionary applications to medicine and public health. Evolutionary Applications, 1, 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00006.x
Packard, R. M. (2007). The making of a tropical disease: A short history of malaria. Baltimore, MD, USA: JHU Press.
Restif, O. (2009). Evolutionary epidemiology 20 years on: Challenges and prospects. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 9, 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2008.09.007
Stearns, S. C., & Koella, J. C. (2008). Evolution in Health and Disease, 2nd edn.Oxford ,NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress.
Sternberg, E. D., & Thomas, M. B. (2017). Insights from agriculture for the management of insecticide resistance in disease vectors. Evolutionary Application, 11, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12501
Tarleton, R. L., Reithinger, R., Urbina, J. A., Kitron, U., & Gürtler, R. E. (2007). The challenges of Chagas disease— grim outlook or glimmer of hope? PLoS Medicine, 4, e332.
Valen, V. (1973). A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1–30.Viana, M., Faust, C. L., Haydon, D. T., Webster, J. P., & Lamberton, P. H.
L. (2017). The effects of subcurative praziquantel treatment on life- history traits and trade- offs in drug- resistant Schistosoma mansoni. Evolutionary Application, 11, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12558
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., Boltz, F., Capon, A. G., de Dias, B. F., … Yach, D. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of The Rockefeller Foundation- Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386, 1973–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1
WHO. (2016). World malaria report: 2016.Wilcox, B. A., & Echaubard, P. (2016). Balancing biomedical and ecologi-
cal perspectives in research framing of liver fluke and cholangiocarci-noma in NE Thailand. Parasitology International, 66, 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.10.002
World Health Organization & UNICEF. (2004). Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soiltransmitted helminthiasis. Geneva: World Health Organization.