Evolutionary Algorithm for Bandstop Frequency SelectiveSurface

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation of the paper on ICCE 2014

Citation preview

  • The Fifth IEEE International Conferenceon Communications and Electronics

    Evolutionary Optimization for Bandstop FrequencySelective Surface

    Linh Ho Manh, Marco Mussetta, Riccardo E.ZichDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

    July 31st, 2014

  • OUTLINE

    Introduction and Motivation

    Frequency Selective Surface by multi-layer microstrip structureAdvantages of proposed solution

    Heuristic Optimization

    Conventional PSOMeta-PSO as a class of variation

    Frequency Selective Surface

    Floquet TheoremNumerical results

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Frequency Selective Surface as A Spatial Filter

    Figure: Radomes to reduce the radar cross-section (RCS) at theCryptologic Operations Center, Misawa, Japan

    Once being exposed to electromagnetic radiation, a FSS behaveslike a spatial filter, some frequency bands are transmitted and some

    are prohibited.

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Different shapes printed a dielectric substrate

    Figure: A variety of FSS elements over the past decade

    The dual rectangular ring configuration printed on FR4 substrate isconsidered for WiFi bandstop filter, prohibited band ranging from2.4 GHz to 2.5 GHz.

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Frequency behavior of complementary FSS structures

    Figure: a) Patch type has capacitive response whereas b) Slot type hasinductive response

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • FSS as a periodic structure

    Figure: Top view of the unit cell in a periodic FSS

    As shown in Figure 4, the solution domain consists of 7 variables:a,a1, b1, t1, t2, a2 ,b2; which are properly modeled to satisfy thefeasibility of fabrication.

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Advantages of proposed solution

    i) Many degrees of freedom to adjust thanks to the dual ringconfiguration

    ii) Easy deployment since the shapes construction arestraightforward

    iii) Wider bandwidth can be achieved by proper tuning ofgeometrical parameters (this procedure is controlled by Globaloptimizer)

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Conventional PSO

    Conventional PSO algorithm can be briefly introduced by a set oftwo equations:

    Vi(k+1) = (k)Vi

    (k) + c11(Pi Xi(k)) + c22(GXi(k)) (1)Xi

    (k+1) = Xi(k) +Vi

    (k+1) (2)

    Figure: Updating velocity rules for Conventional Particle SwarmOptimization

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Undifferentiated Meta-PSOs

    The idea of Meta-PSO is to use multiple swarms to enhance thecapabilities of global search, but adopt different simple rules tomanipulate the interactions among them.

    Figure: Updating velocity rules for Undifferentiated Meta-PSO

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Differentiated Meta-PSOs

    iLj is the index to denote Absolute leader Meta-PSO or

    democratic leader Meta-PSO

    Figure: Updating velocity rules for Differentiated Meta-PSO

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Comparisons between Conventional PSO and Meta-PSO

    Test for a standard cost function:

    c = 1Ni=1

    sin(pi(xi 3))pi(xi 3) (3)

    the objective is to minimize cost value c

    Figure: Capability of PSO and Meta-PSO for a specific and simpleproblem

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Optimization Scheme

    Each set of geometrical parameters stands for one specific FSSconfiguration. What full-wave simulation returns will be used toevaluate the structure. After a certain number of loops, the optimaldesign is retrieved.

    Figure: Optimization scheme with the link between the 3D full-waveanalysis and global optimizer

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Floquet Theorem for a 1D problem

    Considering a 1D periodic surface in x with the period d, in whichu(x) stands for a field reacting with this structure.

    u(x+ d) = Cu(x)

    u(x+ 2d) = Cu(x+ d)

    ...

    ...

    u(x+ nd) = Cu(x+ (n 1)d) (4)The formulas in equation 4 can be express generally as:

    u(x+ nd) = Cnu(x) (5)

    For boundedness and EM fields: C = e+jkd. We can define aperiodic function P (x), where

    P (x) = ejkxu(x) (6)

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Consequently from equation 6, we have:

    P (x+ d) = ejk(x+d)u(x+ d) = ejk(x+d)Cu(x)

    = ejkxejkd(ejkd

    )u(x) = ejkxu(x) = P (x) (7)

    Similarly, P (x+ nd) = P (x)1. P(x) is a periodic function in x, with the period d2. Since P (x) is periodic in x, we can express it via Fourier Series

    P (x) =

    n=

    pnej 2pindx (8)

    Substituting equation 6, then

    u(x) =

    n=pne

    jkxnx (9)

    in which:kxn = k +

    2pin

    d(10)

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Equation 10 represents harmonic expansion of the field u(x), eachterm in Equation 9 stands for a spatial Floquet Harmonic, whichpropagates along the periodic axis. Based on Floquets theorem,any planar periodic function can be expanded as an infinitesuperposition of Floquet harmonics.

    Figure: Organizing FSS as a planar periodic structure

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Frequency Selective Surface solved as a 3D Floquetproblem

    In the restricted scope of this research, all the unit cells are squareby parameter a. FSS structure is illuminated by plane waves withpropagation direction normal to the planar surface and no phasedelays are introduced between adjacent elements.

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Numerical results

    When behaving bandstop characteristics, the requirements ofS21 < 10 dB and S11 > 1 dB should be fulfilled.

    1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 640

    35

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    Frequency (GHz) >

    (dB)

    >

    S11S21WiFi band

    Figure: Frequency response of best configuration ever found by optimizer

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • The objective is to enlarge the bandstop region, prohibitedbandwidth (BW) is related to cost value according to theformulation:

    Cost Value = 100 +BW/2 (11)

    0 5 100

    50

    100

    150Cost Function Max Value

    Iteration0 5 10

    0

    50

    100

    150Cost Function Mean Value

    Iteration

    Figure: The Max and Mean Value throughout 10 iterations

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Optimal FSS design

    Details of optimal parameters are presented in Table 1.

    Table: Optmizied geometrical parameters by Meta-PSO

    Parameter a a1 b1 t1 t2 a2 b2Values 36.7 27.456 27.659 0.756 1.9 8.7 10.071

    911 simulations were evaluated by Meta-PSO optimizer inapproximately 35 hours. Commercial full-wave analysis isimplemented on an Intel(R) core I-7 2600 CPU, 3.4 GHz, 8 GbRam system.

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • Extension of the case

    in order to create a reverse behavior of a spatial bandpass filter, theidea is to make a reverse structure.

    Figure: Top view of the unit cell for a bandpass FSS

    [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

  • [email protected] IEEE ICCE 2014

    Introduction and MotivationFrequency Selective Surface by multi-layer microstrip structureAdvantages of proposed solution

    Heuristic OptimizationConventional PSOMeta-PSO as a class of variation

    Frequency Selective SurfaceFloquet TheoremNumerical results