Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EVOLUTION OF INDIRECT PROCUREMENT
THEORY OF CHANGE
SUSTAIN
SPREAD DEEPEN
SHIFT
Awareness & Inclusion
Ownership & Adoption Permanence
Culture & Behavioral Norms
Lead top-down; Set the mandate and
organizational need for change
Drive adoption bottom-up; Shifting individual ownership
of the change
Align underlying cultural principals and change behavioral norms
Establish ecosystem and controls needed to sustain the change
2 Source: A.T. Kearney - Organization & Transformation Practice - Theory of Change
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: SPREAD
SUSTAIN
SPREAD DEEPEN
SHIFT
• Is there a clear vision of the future state and path forward for the organization?
• Is there an understanding of the need for change across the organization?
• Is there commitment from the senior leadership to champion the change?
• Are there clear aspirational targets and goals that the organization is aligned to achieve?
• Are there mechanisms and resources in place to engage across the organization and enable the appropriate amount of focus throughout the organization?
Lead Top-Down
3
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: SHIFT
SUSTAIN
SPREAD DEEPEN
SHIFT
•What specific processes, roles, and structures will be changing at the local level?
• Are there communication and engagement mechanisms in place to cascade the case for change across the organization?
•Who are the leaders who will drive the change at the front-line?
•Who are the key stakeholders and how should messages be targeted to address resistance?
• Is the organizational infrastructure in place to support the desired future state behaviors?
Drive Bottom-Up
4
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: DEEPEN
SUSTAIN
SPREAD DEEPEN
SHIFT
•What type of organizational culture is needed in the end-state?
•How do efforts uphold underlying organizational values?
•How do you exemplify and embed the behavioral shifts required?
•How can the organization capture people’s emotional commitment to the change?
•What are the structural drivers of non productive behaviors and how can they be eliminated?
Ingrain into Culture & Behaviors
5
CONSIDERATIONS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE: SUSTAIN
SUSTAIN
SPREAD DEEPEN
SHIFT
Embed into the Organization
• What is the plan to address challenges as the program matures beyond the transformation period?
• What is the plan to maintain urgency as new priorities emerge?
• How will the organization embed the responsibility for driving the vision into day to day leadership objectives and plans?
• What is the organization’s reaction or level of adoption to the change?
• How will change capabilities be transitioned and embedded within the organization to enable self-sufficient management?
6
TEAM STRUCTURE: 2011
VP GEMS
TRAVEL GLOBAL
UTILITIES IT/DTC
TRAVEL AGENTS
7
$150MM+ SPEND UNDER MANAGEMENT
TEAM STRUCTURE: 2012
VP GEMS
TRAVEL GLOBAL
UTILITIES IT/DTC STORE SUPPORT SUSTAINABILITY
HOME OFFICE SUPPORT
TRAVEL AGENTS
8
$300MM+ SPEND UNDER MANAGEMENT
TEAM STRUCTURE: 2013
VP GEMS
TRAVEL GLOBAL
UTILITIES IT/DTC STORE SUPPORT SUSTAINABILITY
EUROPEAN UTILITIES
IT/DTC HOME OFFICE
SUPPORT TRAVEL AGENTS
9
$300MM+ SPEND UNDER MANAGEMENT
TEAM STRUCTURE: 2014
VP GEMS
TRAVEL GLOBAL
UTILITIES IT/DTC STORE SUPPORT SUSTAINABILITY
EUROPEAN UTILITIES
VENDOR SETUPS
IT/DTC HOME OFFICE
SUPPORT TRAVEL & EXPENSE
TRAVEL AGENTS
TRAVEL & EXPENSE
10
$500MM+ SPEND UNDER MANAGEMENT
OUR SOURCE-TO-PAY MODEL
Supplier Registrations
(NMVPS)
Supplier Management
(TBD)
Spend Analytics (Ariba)
7-step Sourcing (Ariba)
Contract Management
(Ariba)
Procurement (ePro)
Pay (PeopleSoft,
others)
GEMS
Challenges: •Need more usage •No templates for commodities
Challenges: •Data sources not clean
Challenges: •New tool •Need to develop
processes
Challenges: •Tool not currently owned •No process in place for indirect expense •IT has program started
Challenges: •Writing requisitions not standardized •Little or no line item detail •Garbage in, garbage out
Challenges: •Significant complexity given multiple payment methodologies
Challenges: •Process is very manual •No integration with Ariba •Partial integration with PeopleSoft •NMVPS needs further development
Manage supplier information and track performance
Ensure compliant procure-to-pay cycle
on a daily basis
Create, store, search contracts & track
compliance
Use this information to source efficiently
THE SOURCE-TO-PAY PROCESS SOURCE
GEMS PROCURE
AP PAY
AP
Spend Classification
(TBD)
Commodity Management
(TBD)
eSourcing (Ariba)
Contract Management
(Ariba)
Supplier Registration
(NMVPS)
Spend Analysis (Ariba)
Opportunity Identification
(N/A)
Strategic Sourcing (7-Steps)
Supplier Enablement
(TBD)
Requisition Management
(PeopleSoft)
Invoice Exceptions
Catalog (PeopleSoft)
Supplier Collaboration
(TBD)
Payment Gateway
ERP (PeopleSoft)
Supplier Collaboration
(TBD)
Invoice Imaging & Workflow
(Ikon)
Vendor Portal (NMVPS)
Payment Audit (TBD)
Supplier Performance Management (Visibility, Compliance) (TBD)
Support Functions (Finance PMO, IT, Supplier Diversity, Treasury)
12
EUROPEAN ENERGY SELECT MARKETS: 2012 SUPPLIERS
Gazprom Energy Npower
Multi-Energy
Southern Electric
Lambert Smith Hampton
Stratford Utilities Limited
Retail Utilities Solutions
British Gas Services
EDF Energy
Energies Strasbourg EDF France
Edison Energia
Tradecom
Enel Energia
Enel Servizio Elettrico AceaElectrabel Elettricita
A2A Energia
Unibail-Rodamco Inversiones
Union Fenosa Comercial
Endesa
Iberdrola
Stadium Management
SWM Versorgungs
Mainova Aktiengesellschaft
RheinEnergie
Envia Mitteldeutsche Energie
GETEC net
Stadtwerke Bonn
Stadtwerke Dusseldorf
Vattenfall
SPEND BY SUPPLIER
SITES BY SUPPLIER
Energies Strasbourg EDF France
Tradecom
Edison Energia AceaElectrabel Elettricita
Enel Servizio Elettrico
A2A Energia
Enel Energia Unibail-Rodamco
Inversiones
Union Fenosa Comercial
Endesa
Iberdrola
Envia Mitteldeutsche
Energie
RheinEnergie
SWM Versorgungs
Mainova Aktiengesellschaft
Stadium Management Stadtwerke Dusseldorf
GETEC net
Vattenfall
Stadtwerke Bonn
Lambert Smith Hampton
Npower
Multi-Energy British Gas Services
Southern Electric
Gazprom Energy
Retail Utilities Solutions
Stratford Utilities Limited
EDF Energy
Germany United Kingdom France Italy Spain
13
EUROPEAN ENERGY SELECT MARKETS: 2012 & 2014
NUMBER OF SITES, 2012-2014
SAVINGS
• Between 2012 and 2014, over $1MM in savings delivered to company operating expense, equivalent to almost $1 EPS.
NUMBER OF SUPPLIERS, 2012-2014
KEY POINTS
• Additional savings are expected from efforts in France.
• Significant consolidation of suppliers; better relationships with fewer suppliers with potential of improved energy efficiency.
• Uninterrupted service
• Willing partner open to testing additional savings tools.
• Investigating additional contract savings opportunities UK, and Germany.
CONSOLIDATED CONTRACT SAVINGS: UK, DE, IT, ES
Year Countries Contract Savings
2012 UK Over $50k
2013 UK, DE, ES Over $250k
2014 UK, IT, ES Over $500k
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
United Kingdom
Italy Spain Germany France Overall
2012 Sites
2014 Sites
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
United Kingdom
Italy Spain Germany France Overall
2012 Suppliers
2014 Suppliers
14
R&M DOMESTIC GENERAL MAINTENANCE RFP
POST-TEST UPDATE: OCTOBER 2014
Supplier A Supplier B Supplier C
Supplier B Supplier D
POST-RFP AWARD PLAN: FEBRUARY 2014
STRATEGY
• Partnered with internal customers to manage Repair & Maintenance spend.
• Focused on the 34% of maintenance spend that goes towards general maintenance.
• Conducted RFP to vet new suppliers and reduce pricing for incumbents.
RESULTS
• Post-RFP award plan was modified based on supplier performance during test period.
• Two incumbents were awarded the business, at rates that were driven down by the RFP process (~$1M savings).
• Shortcomings in the on-boarding process were identified, which will be corrected for future events.
15
PATH FORWARD: 2015 & BEYOND SOURCING PROCESS
• Further drive the adoption of our 7-Step Sourcing Process within the company.
IDENTIFY SCOPE ANALYZE BUILD SOURCE EXECUTE MAINTAIN
TEAM DEVELOPMENT
• Opportunities to develop and test presentation skills.
• Further development of project management skills
• Increased exposure to Contract Management process
16