Upload
maximillian-sharp
View
221
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evolution and Modern Archaeology Theory
January 28, 2015Anth 130
Darwin and Evolution
• Charles Darwin publishes The Origin of Species in 1859….everything changes!
• “Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations”
• What does this mean for the way we study culture?
Cultural Evolution Theory
• The idea that cultural “evolves” over time to create a more “civilized” species
• societies evolve from savagery through barbarism to civilization
What other two ideas occurred to bring about a scientific approach to archaeology?
Classification-Historical Period(or Culture History)
• Lasted from the late 1800s-1960• Central concern was chronology • Looked at ancient civilizations and tried to
figure out a time frame for their cultures• The question that was trying to be answered: To
what period do this artifacts date? With which other materials do they belong? Who made them?
• Artifact assemblages=culture
Flinders Petrie (1853-1942)
• Worked in Egypt and later Palestine
• Devised a dating method called “serration” to establish chronology
• Believed in collectingEverything found in the Field
Gordon Childe(1892-1957)
• Worked on making comparisons between prehistoric communities in Europe
• Attempted to account for artifacts origins
• Was very influenced by Marxist theory
• Addressed why things changed in the past
Cultural History Archaeologist believed
• Change happened in one of three ways: migration, invention, diffusion
• Space needed to be organized into “cultural areas”
• Culture evolved unilineal
What are the problems with this approach?
Do Pots=People?
Native American Language Families
Native American Cultural Areas
Do all cultures evolve unilineally?
Willey and Philips’ 1958:
New World Developmental Stages
• Postclassic- metallurgy, cities• Classic- craft specialization, ceremonial centers• Formative- pottery, agriculture, permanent towns• Archaic- groundstone, semi-permanent towns• Paleo-Indian- chipped stone tools, mobile hunter-
gatherers
Good things to come out of Culture History!
• New apparition for attention to detail• Stratigraphic excavation• Typology• New dating techniques: serration
Processual Archaeology (or New Archaeology)
• 1960-Present• Want to answer the question Why? • Looks at different processes at work within a
society • Looks to explain a culture instead of describe a
culture
Lewis Bindford(1931-2011)
• Argued against the approach of using archaeology to write a “counterfeit history”
• Had a more optimistic view of what archaeology could do for our understanding of the past
• Believed that interpretation should be based on a framework of logical arguments
• Archaeology should EXPLAIN history not DESCRIBE history
• Analyze cultures as a system which could b broken down into subsystems
• Led to the study of certain aspects of culture in their own right: trade, subsistence, technology etc..
• Less emphasis on artifact typology• Turned away from the approach's of history
and towards those of science
Focused on a Ecological view of culture
• The idea that societies adapt to their environment by culture…
• Cultures interact with not only each other but with their environments as well.
• Does this mean that cultures are environmentally determined?
Gordon Willey(1913-2002)
• Studied pre-Columbian occupation in the Viru Valley in Peru
Also focused on a Materialistic view of culture
• A society’s solution to basic biological needs affects higher forms of organization
• The idea that human cultural is a “response to practice problems of earthly existence”
• It is a scientific research strategy which uses the scientism method
• Infrastructure is the most significant force behind the evolution of culture
Important things to come out of Processual Archaeology
• Radiometric dating
• Plant and animal studies
• Raw material analysis
• Deductive Reasoning
• Multilineal cultural evolution
Post-Processual Archaeology
• 1980’s-Present
• No single correct way to interpret archaeological data
• Also known as the “interpretive approach”
• Goal is to explain the past with an “insiders” perspective…Why and What did it mean?
Post-Processual Archaeology focuses on
• Multiple perspectives from different theories and disciplines
• Focuses on minority groups and their role (gender, ethnic etc.)
• Rejects the strictness of the scientific method • Social awareness• Stresses the idea of the “individual” or “agent”• Rejects generalization
Four different ways to interpret
• Antiquarianism• Culture History• Processual Archaeology• Post-Processual Archaeology
In groups discuss the difference between the four theoretical movements in archaeology…which do you agree with the most?
Example: Four Approaches to Interpreting a Barrow
What is a Barrow?
A mound containing a tomb
Found in W. Europe
Part of the Neolithic cultural landscape that also included henges and circles
Antiquarian Approach1849:
John Merewether dug West Kennett and 34 others in 4 weeks!
Results:
few artifacts, little of interest.
Antiquarian Approach
• What’s wrong with this approach?
• Isn’t there more to prehistory than the potential for finding treasure?
• Is this pace of excavation ethical?
Culture History Approach
1955-1956: Stuart Piggott conducted large-scale, systematic excavations
Mapped the architecture and artifacts
Illustrated and analyzed the pottery
Culture History Approach
Results:• West Kennett Barrow assigned to the “Severn-
Cotswold” barrow type• Pottery placed into types: e.g.“Peterborough
ware”• Discussed distribution of types• Speculated about origins of barrow idea
(diffusion, migration, innovation).
Culture History Approach
• What’s wrong with this approach?
• Is it too descriptive?
• Why are there norms? Why do they change?
Processual Approach
• Observation: – Radiocarbon dates show that European
barrows are older than those on Crete. Must find local explanation.
• Research questions: – Why did people build barrows? What
function did they serve?
Processual Approach
• Observation: – barrow builders were farmers, and barrows
are regularly spaced on good farming land.
• Hypothesis: – communal tombs serve as land claim
markers where land is scarce
• Based on ethnographic analogy
Processual Approach
Interpretation:Long barrows were an element of an adaptive system that enabled some groups to work together and hold onto valuable land.
Processual Approach
• What’s wrong with this approach?
• Does it seem too mechanical?
• Don’t people’s needs go beyond basic food and shelter concerns?
Postprocessual Approach
• Questions: – What did the barrow mean to it’s builders? – What was its long-term context?
• Observations: – Farming came to Britain from Europe through
diffusion or migration. – British long barrows are similar in form to
earlier European long houses
Postprocessual Approach
BarrowsLong houses
Postprocessual Approach
• Interpretation: – Long Barrows are metaphors for houses– Meaning: community meeting places, living and
dead are reunited– Mingling of bodies emphasizes equality
• What’s wrong with this approach?
• Can we prove these conclusions?