EVALUATION RESULTS

March 14 and 15, 2012 - New York, New York

• Who Responded?

• Overall Summit Evaluation

• Evaluation of Sessions

• Evaluation of Logistics and Support

• Evaluation Comments

2

Contents

WHO RESPONDED?

3

4

Who Responded?

Definitions: Participants: Country and sponsor teams engaged in dialogue at the center tableAttendees: Invited guests in audience observing dialogue and participating in Q&A

OVERALL SUMMIT EVALUATION

5

The summit as a whole was useful. I am glad I attended.

6

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.4 Participants: 47 Attendees: 4.4 Attendees: 89All: 4.4 All: 136

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

7

Average Score Respondent Totals Participants: 4.1 Participants: 47Attendees: 4.2 Attendees: 89All: 4.1 All: 136

I learned about policies and practices that will help me when I return home.

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

I made valuable professional connections.

8

Average Score Respondent Totals:Participants: 4.2 Participants: 47

Attendees: 4.1 Attendees: 89All: 4.1 All: 136

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

The OECD background paper was informative and will serve as a useful tool as I continue this work.

9

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.5 Participant:

47Attendees: 4.3 Attendees: 89All: 4.4 All: 136

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

The meeting logistics and pre-meeting communications were effective.

10

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.3 Participants: 47Attendees: 4.2 Attendees: 89All: 4.2 All: 136

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

EVALUATION OF SESSIONS

11

Quality, relevance and usefulness of the Framing the Issues session

12

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.5 Participants: 43Attendees: 4.7 Attendees: 83All: 4.6 All: 126

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Quality, relevance and usefulness of Session 1: Developing School Leaders

13

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.2 Participants: 45Attendees: 4.1 Attendees: 86All: 4.1 All: 131

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Quality, relevance and usefulness of Session 2: Preparing Teachers: Delivery of 21st Century Skills

14

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.2 Participants: 45Attendees: 4.2 Attendees: 86All: 4.2 All: 131

(5 = Excellent , 1= Poor)

Quality, relevance and usefulness of Session 3: Preparing Teachers: Matching Supply and Demand

15

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.2 Participants: 43Attendees: 4.3 Attendees: 78All: 4.2 All: 121

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Session Format Part I – International examples

16

Average Score Respondent Totals

Participants: 4.4 Participants: 44 Attendees: 4.4 Attendees: 88All: 4.4 All: 132

Average Score Respondent Totals

Participant: 4.1 Participants: 44 Attendee: 4.2 Attendees:

88All: 4.2 All:

132

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the format of the sessions. (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Session Format Part II – International participant discussion

Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the format of the sessions

17

Session Format Part III – attendee/observer Q&A

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 3.8 Participants: 45Attendees: 4.0 Attendees: 87All: 3.9 All: 132

Ministers’ Lunch

18

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Average Score: 4.5 Respondent Totals: 12

Union Leaders’ Lunch

19

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Average Score: 3.2 Respondent Totals: 33

Lunch Discussions (Attendees and other country participants)

20

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Average Score: 3.9 Respondent Totals: 81

Country Group Meetings

21

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

Average Score: 4.2 Respondent Totals: 46

Quality, relevance and usefulness of the Closing Session: What Have We Learned? Where Do We Go From Here?

22

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.4 Participants: 39Attendees: 4.5 Attendees: 63All: 4.4 All: 102

(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)

EVALUATION OF LOGISTICS & SUPPORT

23

Travel and hotel information was clear and timely

24

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.5 Participants: 43Attendees: 4.6 Attendees: 82All: 4.6 All: 125

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

Hilton NY was an effective setting for the summit

25

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.5 Participants: 44Attendees: 4.5 Attendees: 88All: 4.5 All: 132

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

My questions and concerns were addressed in a timely and complete manner

26

Average Score Respondent TotalsParticipants: 4.6 Participants: 38Attendees: 4.6 Attendees: 63All: 4.6 All: 101

(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)

EVALUATION COMMENTS

27

28

Comments on 2012

• Excellent facilitator, framer and rapporteurs.

• It was helpful to receive the OECD background report ahead of time.

• The agenda was clear--not too ambitious and very high quality.

• The audience lunch discussion was excellent. People were engaged and made valuable connections.

• The Ministers' lunch was a great addition to the agenda, and I liked the time for each country group to discuss what they learned and their top priority going forward.

• 90 second closing presentations were focused and clear, aimed at actionable statements.

• Not enough specific "tie-back" to last year and what each nation has done since the 2011 Summit.

29

Suggestions for 2013

• If possible, have more exchange prior to the event, for example, make country background material available in advance.

• Start the 2013 Summit with country reports on progress made since 2012.

• Spend more time discussing how to implement successful practices.

• Find a way to bring more depth to the discussions.

• Plan organized networking so more delegates meet each other.

• Arrange meeting so observers can see the speakers better.

• Use technology to gather questions from the audience.

• Have more follow-on discussion after the Summit, perhaps online. The Summit just whetted the appetite!

Prepared by the U.S. Department of Education