11
Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

More guidance In the period the new legal framework and the common monitoring and evaluation system (CMES) provide more guidance for constructing the NRN intervention logic and the NRN monitoring and evaluation system Common NRN objectives, the common groups of activities, the common evaluation question and three common output indicators Member States are expected to further complete the NRN intervention logic with programme-specific objectives and groups of activities. Member States also need to develop NRN specific expected results and impacts, set up programme-specific evaluation questions for NRNs and develop the respective result and impact indicators to measure NRN achievements 2

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020

Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

Page 2: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

Experiences 2007-2013• Already in the 07-13 programming period NRNs were subject to

evaluation (ex ante, ongoing, mid-term and ex-post evaluation)• Evaluations were either conducted as stand-alone evaluations

or as part of the RDP evaluation• Most evaluators relied on the use of output indicators (e.g.

number of events organised) • Some evaluations also assessed the contribution of the NRN to

RDP objectives and the results of the network and the added value of NRN activities

• NRN self-assessment was conducted by several NRN “pioneers” with many challenges

• Evaluation of NRN had to face many methodological challenges which were caused by the specific character of NRN interventions

2

Page 3: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

More guidance 2014-2020

In the 14-20 period the new legal framework and the common monitoring and evaluation system (CMES) provide more guidance for constructing the NRN intervention logic and the NRN monitoring and evaluation system• Common NRN objectives, the common groups of activities,

the common evaluation question and three common output indicators

• Member States are expected to further complete the NRN intervention logic with programme-specific objectives and groups of activities.

• Member States also need to develop NRN specific expected results and impacts, set up programme-specific evaluation questions for NRNs and develop the respective result and impact indicators to measure NRN achievements

2

Page 4: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

4

NRN objectives (with different scope)

Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, Art 54(2):• Increase the involvement of stakeholders in the

implementation of rural development;• Improve the quality of implementation of Rural

Development Programmes;• Inform the broader public and potential beneficiaries on

rural development policy and funding opportunities;• Foster innovation in agriculture, food production, forestry

and rural areas.

Page 5: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

5

Common Evaluation Question

• The AIRs submitted by 30 June in 2017 and 2019 must contain the information on the RDP progress and quantification of achievements towards programme objectives.

• In relation to NRN evaluation, the common evaluation question has to be answered : „To what extent has the national rural network contributed to achieving the objectives laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, Art. 54 (2)?” utilising the common output indicators and additional information developed by Member States

Page 6: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

6

NRN activities (minimum set)Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, Art 54(3):• collection of examples of projects covering all priorities of

the Rural Development Programmes• facilitation of thematic and analytical exchanges between

rural development stakeholders• provision of training and networking for local action groups • provision of networking for advisors and innovation

support services;• sharing and dissemination of monitoring and evaluation

findings;• a communication plan • participation in and contribution to the European Network

For Rural Development.

Page 7: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

7

Common output indicators (minimum set)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014

• Number of thematic and analytical exchanges set up with the support of NRN;

• Number of NRN communication tools;• Number of ENRD activities in which the NRN has

participated.

Page 8: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

8

Connecting objectives, activities & outcomes

Page 9: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

9

Construct a NRN specific causal pathway for a change processKey questionWhat kind of (non-financial) barrieres have to be removed and what pre-conditions have to be created step by step (e.g. access to knowledge and relevant cooperation partners) to achieve the expected outcomes (NRN and RD objectives)?How to define?• Specific Output indicators related to NRN activites• Result indicators related to specific NRN objectives? (e.g.

results for specific target groups)• Impact indicators related to the overall NRN and RD

objectives

Page 10: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

10

Short exercise

xxxx

xxxx

I ndicator

xxx

xxx xxxxxx

xxx

Ultimate goal

Medium termresults

Longer term impact

Short termoutputs

xxx

xx

xxxxx xx

I ndicator

Activities xxx xxxxx xx

Page 11: Evaluation of NRNs 2014-2020 Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor

11

Thank you for your attention!

European Evaluation Helpdesk for Rural DevelopmentBoulevard Saint Michel 77-79

B-1040 BrusselsTel. +32 2 7375130

E-mail [email protected]://enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation