Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EvaluationofBCEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms
EARLY CHILDHOOD SCREENINGRESEARCH & EVALUATION UNIT
FINAL REPORT
ThisdocumentwaspreparedfortheEarlyChildhoodDentalEvaluationSubcommitteebytheHumanEarlyLearningPartnership’sEarlyChildhoodScreeningResearchandEvaluationUnitattheUniversityofBritishColumbia.
July,2011
EARLY CHILDHOOD SCREENINGRESEARCH & EVALUATION UNIT
PrinciPal investigator
Brenda Poon
co-PrinciPal investigator
Clyde Hertzman
research and evaluation Manager
Paul Holley
research and evaluation coordinator
amBer louie
research assistants
deBoraH Heard, deClan Hsu, allyson rayner Celina Vergel de dios
data analyst
anna KrasnoVa
sPatial data analyst and cartograPher
antHony smitH
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Contents
i ABOUTTHEEVALUATIONTEAM
ii ABOUTTHEHUMANEARLYLEARNINGPARTNERSHIP
iii BACKGROUNDANDOVERVIEW
1 EARLYCHILDHOODCARIESANDBCEARLYCHILDHOODDENTALPROGRAMS
5 BCEARLYCHILDHOODDENTALPROGRAMSLOGICMODEL
7 EVALUATIONMEASURESANDMETHODS7 DefiningandMeasuringEarlyChildhoodCaries8 TheKindergartenDentalSurveyinBritishColumbia:ABriefOverview9 EnvironmentalScan10 FocusGroupswithPublicHealthDentalStaff11 ProvincialandRegionalMapping
12EVALUATIONFINDINGS
13EARLYCHILDHOODDENTALHEALTHSURVEILLANCE13 1.Istheoralhealthofyoungchildrenimproving?Bycommunity?By
vulnerability?14 EarlyChildhoodCariesinBritishColumbia’sHealthAuthoritiesand
HealthRegions17 EarlyChildhoodCariesbySchoolDistrictandHELP
Neighbourhoods22 SocioeconomicInfluencesofEarlyChildhoodOralHealthinBritish
Columbia29 On-andOff-Diagonals31 VisibleDentalDecayRatesandEarlyChildDevelopmentIndicators
33 Summary
34RISKASSESSMENT34 2.Arethecurrentdentalhealthriskassessment/screenguidelinesimplementedas
intended?34 2i.Whatstandardizeddentalhealthriskassessmenttool/questionsshouldbe
usedwithchildrenaged0-5(includingkindergartenentry)inBC?35 2ii.Atwhatage(s)shouldthesebeadministered?35 2iii.Whoshouldadministerthedentalhealthriskassessment?36 2iv.Whatguidelinesandfollow-upproceduresshouldbeused?37 2v.Towhatextentdoesthedentalhealthriskassessment/screeningreachyoung
children?38 2vi.Towhatextentdoestheprogramidentifyabroadspectrumofchildrenat
riskforcaries?38 2vii.Forthoseeligiblechildrenwhodentalpublichealthisnotreaching,whatare
thebarriers?41 Summary
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Contentscontinued...
42HEALTHPROMOTIONANDPREVENTIVESTRATEGIES42 3.Arehealthpromotioninterventionseffectiveinsupportingfamilydentalhealth
practicestowardreducingearlychildhoodcaries?
43BUILDINGPARTNERSHIPS43 4.Whatstrategiesareusedinthehealthauthoritiestopreventearly
childhooddentaldisease?Whatisthemosteffectivecombinationofstrategiesbeingprovidedinthehealthauthoritiestopreventearlychildhooddentaldisease?
46 Whatarethemosteffectivecombinationsofstrategiesbeingusedtoreduceearlychildhoodcaries?
47 Summary
48GENERALTHEMES
52STRENGTHSANDLIMITATIONSOFTHEEVALUATIONPROCESS52 Strengths54 Limitations
55RECOMMENDATIONS
58REFERENCES
63APPENDIXA:EvaluationMatrix
65APPENDIXB:ListofEvaluationReports,Documents&Maps
67APPENDIXC:SummaryofSelectedStudiesUtilizingtheBasicScreeningSurvey
68APPENDIXD:MethodologicalNotes
72APPENDIXE:HELPSESScalesandSubscales
74 APPENDIXF:KeyMessagesInOralHealth-relatedPublicHealthHandouts
Listoffigures3 Figure1.BCEarlyChildhoodDentalHealthPrograms6 Figure2.2007BCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramLogicModel10 Figure3.BCKindergartenDentalSurveyCoveragebyHealthAuthority16 Figure4.KindergartenDentalHealthOutcomesbyHealthAuthority19 Figure5.1.MapofBritishColumbiaDepictingthePercentageofKindergarten
StudentsIdentifiedasHavingVisibleDentalDecayin2009/10bySchoolDistrict21 Figure5.2.TsawwassenNorth(VCHA)21 Figure5.3SunValley(FHA)21 Figure5.4 Rockland(VIHA)21 Figure5.5DawsonCreek(NHA)23 Figure6.SESandDemographicMeasuresforProvinceandHealthAuthorities25 Figure7.VisibleDentalDecayRatesbyHELPSESPercentile
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Contentscontinued...
Listoftables9 Table1.BCKindergartenDentalSurveyCoverageforHealthRegionsbySurvey
Year15 Table2.1.KindergartenDentalHealthOutcomesbySurveyYearforHealth
Regions16 Table2.2.KindergartenDentalHealthOutcomesandNumberofKindergarten
StudentsSurveyedin2006/0717 Table2.3.KindergartenDentalHealthOutcomesandNumberofKindergarten
StudentsSurveyedin2009/10byHealthRegion18 Table2.4.ChangeinKindergartenDentalHealthOutcomesandNumberof
KindergartenStudentsAffectedbyHealthRegion20 Table3.1.NeighbourhoodsWitha25%orGreaterChangein%VisibleDental
DecayBetweenSurveyYears20 Table3.2.SchoolDistrictswithConsistentVisibleDentalDecayRatesAcross
SurveyYears22 Table4.SocioeconomicStatus(SES)andDemographicInformationforProvince
andHAs24 Table5.VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)RatesbyNeighbourhood
SocioeconomicStatus(basedonoverallHELPSESIndex)24 Table6.1.CorrelationsbetweenSubcommitteeSES/DemographicMeasuresand
%VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)25 Table6.2.CorrelationsbetweenHELPSESIndexandSubcomponentsand%
VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)26 Table7.1.RegressionAnalysisforSES(Subcommittee)and%VisibleDental
Decay(Code02+03)27 Table7.2.RegressionAnalysisforSES(HELP)and%VisibleDentalDecay(Code
02+03)28 Table8.1.SubcommitteeSES/DemographicImportanceScoresinPredictingthe
%VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)29 Table8.2.HELPSESIndexandComponentImportanceScoresinPredicitingthe
%VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)30 Table9.SummaryofNeighbourhoodOn/Off-Diagonals(SESDental)30 Table10.NeighbourhoodOff-Diagonals(SESDental)31 Table11.EDI(Wave3)VulnerabilityRates(%)forProvinceandHAs32 Table12.CorrelationsbetweenEDIVulnerabilityRates(Wave3)and%Visible
DentalDecay(Code02+03)32 Table13.RegressionAnalysisfor%VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)and
EDIVulnerabilityRates(Wave3)
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
i
ABOUT THE EVALUATION TEAM
BrendaPoon,PrincipalInvestigator,isanAssistantProfessorattheHumanEarlyLearningPartnership(HELP),CollegeforInterdisciplinaryStudiesatUBC,andanAssociatefacultymemberintheSchoolofPopulationandPublicHealthatUBC.
ClydeHertzman,Co-PrincipalInvestigator,isDirectorofHELP,CollegeforInterdisciplinaryStudiesatUBC;CanadaResearchChairinPopulationHealthandHumanDevelopment;andProfessorintheSchoolofPopulationandPublicHealthatUBC.
PaulHolley,ResearchandEvaluationManager,holdsadoctorateinSociologyandspecializesinprogramevaluation,grantwriting,andstatisticalanalysis.Paul’scurrentresearchinterestsrelatetoearlychildhooddevelopmentandadolescentdrugandviolenceprevention.
AmberLouie,ResearchandEvaluationCoordinator,holdsanMScinPopulationHealth.Shebringsexperienceinqualitativemethods,questionnairedesign,statisticalanalysis,systematicliteraturereviews,andhealthservicesevaluation.
TheevaluationteamalsoincludesfourResearchAssistants,onedataanalystandadataanalyst/cartographer.ThefourresearchassistantsareDeclanHsu(BA),CelinaVergeldeDios(MA),DeborahHeard(BA&Sc),andAllysonRayner(MA),eachofwhomhaveabackgroundinearlychilddevelopmentanddevelopmentalpsychology.ThedataanalystisAnnaKrasnova(BSc)whohasabackgroundindataprocessingmethodologies.AnthonySmith(BA)isthedataanalystandcartographer,hisresearchinterestsincludesustainableurbandesign,spatialstatisticsandgeographicdatavisualization.
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
ii
ABOUT THE HUMAN EARLY LEARNING PARTNERSHIP
TheHumanEarlyLearningPartnership(HELP)isaconsortiumoffivemajoruniversitiesinBritishColumbiathatfostersinnovationthroughnetworkingandcollaborationamongstresearchersattheUniversityofBritishColumbia,theUniversityofVictoria,SimonFraserUniversity,UniversityofNorthernBritishColumbia,andThompsonRiversUniversity.ItisthefocalpointforearlychilddevelopmentresearchinBritishColumbia.HELPconductsresearchthataimstohelpchildrenandfamiliesthrive.Toachieveitsgoals,HELPworkscloselywithcommunitiesacrossBCtodrawontheirexpertiseaboutlocalfactorsthatdeterminechildren’soutcomes.
HELP’sresearchapproachintegratesbehaviouralandsocialscienceswiththebiomedicalsciences.ResearchconductedatHELPshowshowtheenvironmentsthatchildrenspendtheirtimeinduringtheirearlyyears“sculpt”theirbrains.Thissculptingprocessaffectslife-longhealth,well-being,learningandbehaviour.Withitsinterdisciplinaryapproach,HELPaimstomakeauniqueinternationalresearchcontributiontounderstandingthebiological,psychologicalandsocietalfactorsthatinfluencechildren’shealthanddevelopment.Inpursuitofthismission,HELPwill:
• Highlighttheimportanceoftheearlyyearsonhealth&development.• Utilizealongitudinal,life-courseperspective.• Facilitatecell-to-societyresearchcollaborationsanddiscourse.• Fosterinter-disciplinary,inter-institutional,inter-culturalandinter-sectoralpartnerships.
• Facilitateknowledgeexchangecapableoftransforminglivesandcommunities.
HELPistheworld’sfirstconsortiumofresearchersinterestedinbringingapopulation-basedperspectivetoearlychilddevelopment.Overthelastdecade,throughanalysisofdevelopmentaltrajectoriesofentirepopulationsofchildren,HELPhasproducedresearchthatdocumentssystematicdifferencesinchildren’slongtermhealthanddevelopmentandthesocialdeterminantsthataccountforthesedifferences.
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
iii
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
In2005,BritishColumbia’sMinistryofHealth(MoH)establishedaprovince-widegoalinrelationtoearlychildhooddentalhealth:60%ofBritishColumbia’skindergartenpopulationwillhave“novisibledecayexperience.”Inotherwords,threeoutoffivekindergartenchildreninBCwhosedentalhealthwascheckedthroughastandardizedpublichealthvisualdentalsurveytoolwillbe“caries-free.”
Todetermineprogresstowardthisprovincialgoal,theMoHapproachedtheHumanEarlyLearningPartnership(HELP)attheUniversityofBritishColumbia(UBC)in2006toconductasystematicfour-yearevaluationoftheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms.ThestatedpurposeoftheevaluationistoassesstheeffectivenessofexistingBCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramstoimprovethedentalhealthofchildreninBC.Asaleaderinpopulation-basedearlychilddevelopmentresearchinBritishColumbia,HELPwaswellpositionedtoinvestigateBC’searlychildhooddentalprogramsinrelationtothedevelopmentofchildrenovertime,alongwithfactorsthatcanpromoteorunderminehealthychilddevelopment.HELPalsoenhancedtheprojectwiththeabilitytodrawlinkagesbetweendentaloutcomesandneighbourhoodleveldatainregardstoschoolreadinessasmeasuredbytheEarlyDevelopmentInstrument(EDI).
InApril2007,aDentalEvaluationSubcommitteewasformedtoproviderecommendationsforthedevelopmentandimplementationoftheevaluationplanforBC’searlychildhooddentalprograms.TheSubcommitteeiscomprisedofrepresentativesfromeachoftheprovince’sfiveregionalhealthauthorities,theMinistryofHealth,BCInitiativesandtheNationalCollaboratingCentreforAboriginalHealth,andtheHELPevaluationteamfromUBC.Otherindividualsandorganizationswerealsoconsultedonanadhocbasistoenhancethediversityofexperienceandexpertiseinthegroup.AkeyfunctionoftheSubcommitteewastoensuretheevaluationplanreflectedprogramobjectivesandkeystakeholderinput,andthatitwouldinformprogramplanningandmonitoring.ThecommitteefocusedoncomponentsoftheplanthathadsharedrelevanceandsignificanceacrossHealthAuthoritiesandacrossvariousstakeholders.
TheSubcommitteemetregularlytodevelopanevaluationframeworktoguidethefour-yearproject1.Fouroverarchingevaluationquestionswereestablished:
1. Istheoralhealthofyoungchildrenimproving?Bycommunity?Byvulnerability?
2. Arethecurrentdentalhealthriskassessment/screenguidelinesimplementedasintended(i.e.,appropriatereferralsbypublichealthnurses)?Whatstandardizeddentalhealthriskassessmenttool/questionsshouldbeusedwithchildrenaged0-5(includingkindergartenentry)inBC?Atwhatage(s)shouldthesebeadministered?Whoshouldadministerthedentalhealthriskassessment?Whatguidelinesandfollow-upshouldbeused?Towhatextentdoesthedentalhealthriskassessment/screeningreachyoungchildren?Towhatextentdoestheprogramidentifyabroadspectrumofchildrenatriskforcaries?Forthoseeligiblechildrenwhodentalpublichealthisnotreaching,whatarethebarriers?
1HumanEarlyLearningPartnershipEvaluationTeam,BC Early Childhood Vision Screening Program: Evaluation Framework Overview(Vancouver,BC:UniversityofBritishColumbia,2009).
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
iv
3. Howeffectivearehealthpromotioninterventions(e.g.,keymessages)insupportingfamilydentalhealthpracticestowardreducingearlychildhood?
4. Whatstrategiesareusedinthehealthauthoritiestopreventearlychildhooddentaldisease?Whatisthemosteffectivecombinationofstrategiesbeingprovidedinthehealthauthoritiestopreventearlychildhooddentaldisease?
Toguidedatacollectionandanalysesandtoensurethattheevaluationprocessremainedfocusedonthefourevaluationquestionsabove,anevaluationmatrixwasdevelopedattheoutsetoftheproject(seeAppendixA).Thematrixdefinedandlinkedthedentalissuespertinenttotheevaluationwiththefollowing:1)evaluationquestions,2)keyoutcomemeasuresanddatasources,and3)atimeline.ThematrixwascompletedincollaborationwiththeMinistryofHealthandregionalhealthauthorities,andwasakeytoolinunderstandingeachpartner’srolesandresponsibilities.
Thereportpresentedhereinrespondstoeachofthefourevaluationquestionsthroughasynthesisofqualitativeandquantitativefindingsthatweregeneratedoverthecourseofthefour-yearevaluationproject(seeAppendixBforalistofevaluationreportsanddocuments).
ThereportbeginswithabriefoverviewofselectedresearchrelatedtoearlychildhoodcariesaswellastheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms.Asummaryofthedataandmethodologiesusedintheevaluationprocessisfollowedbyapresentationoftheevaluationfindings.Theevaluationfindingshavebeenorganizedinthisreportaccordingtothefouroverarchingevaluationquestionsand,morebroadly,intothefollowingfourmaincategories:surveillance,riskassessment,healthpromotionandpreventionstrategies,andbuildingpartnerships.
Thefocusofthesurveillancesectionisapresentationofselectedfindingsfromtheanalysisofthe2006/07and2009/10KindergartenDentalSurveys.Resultsarepresentedfortheprovince,healthauthorities,andhealthservicedeliveryareasinrelationtosocioeconomicstatus,demographicsfactorsandearlychilddevelopment.Followingthisdiscussionofdentalhealthsurveillance,isareviewoftheresultsdrawnfromtheprovince-widefocusgroups.Thesequalitativefindingsarefirstpresentedinrelationtoriskassessmentsandtheirguidelines,respectivetools,recommendedtools,follow-upproceduresandprogramreach.Resultsarepresentedintermsofcurrentproceduresandrecommendedprocedures.Abriefdiscussionisthenpresentedonhealthpromotionstrategiesanddentalhealth,followedbyanexplorationofpartnershipbuildingasaneffectivestrategyforpreventingdentaldecay.ThereportconcludeswithanoverviewofthekeythemesthathaveemergedfromthedataandfourbroadrecommendationsforconsiderationwithrespecttotheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms.
page1
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
EARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES AND BC EARLY CHILDHOOD DENTAL PROGRAMS
Dentalhealthisessentialtothehealthofthepopulationasithasfar-reachingimplicationsforchildrenandadults.Inadulthood,forinstance,poororalhealthcannegativelyimpactpotentialjobopportunities,publicspeaking,andothersocialinteractions.2Amongchildren,EarlyChildhoodCaries(ECC),atermusedtodescribetoothdecayfoundinchildren71monthsandyounger,isthemostcommonchronicdisease–fivetimesmoreprevalentthanasthmaandtwentytimesmoreprevalentthandiabetes.3Earlychildhoodcariesisaninfectiousdiseaseinvolvingacombinationoffactors,includingsocial,behavioral,microbiologic,environmental,andclinicalfactors.4Thediseaseoccursworldwide,afflictingpredominantlydisadvantagedchildren.5Fourcohortstudieshaveshownthatchildrenwithpreviouscariesexperienceareatelevatedriskforfuturecaries.6, 7, 8, 9Children’soralhealthimpactstheirsocialfunctioningandeconomicproductivitylaterinlife.10
Instudiesofchildrenundertheageof6,dentaldecayorearlychildhoodcarieshasbeenlinkedtoembarrassment,increasedirritability,andfewersocialinteractions.11, 12Dentaldecayisalsorelatedtoachild’ssubsequenthealthandemotionaldevelopment.Amongchildrenaged4to15,carieshasbeensignificantlyassociatedwithadverseaffectsonsmiling,self-confidenceandemotionalwell-being.13, 14,15, 16Researchhasalsofoundthatdentaldecayaffectsthequalityoflifeforchildren,includingchildrenfromaffluentfamilies,17withloweroverallhappinessforchildrenexperiencingdentaldecay.
Whiletherearemanypotentialcausesofearlychildhoodcaries,oneofthemostimportantfactorsissocioeconomicstatus(SES),whichisusedtodescribethesocialandeconomicwellbeingofachild’sfamily,neighbourhoodandschool.
2A.N.Astrometal.,“OralimpactsondailyperformanceinNorwegianadults:theinfluenceofage,numberofmissingteeth,andsocio-demographicfactors,”European Journal of Oral Sciences114,no.2(2006):115-121.3CanadianAssociationofPediatricHealthCentres,“EarlyChildhoodCaries:AnEpidemicandPandemicinNorthAmerica”,2007,http://www.caphc.org/documents_annual/2007/conference_ppts/16_10_2007/cc1/k_morley.pdf.4AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistryCouncilonClinicalAffairs,“Policyonuseofacaries-riskassessmenttool(CAT)forinfants,children,andadolescents,”Pediatr Dent29,no.7(2006):25-7.5R.J.Berkowitz,“Causes,treatmentandpreventionofearlychildhoodcaries:Amicrobiologicperspective,”Journal of the Canadian Dental Association69,no.5(2003):304-307.6M.Grindefjordetal.,“Predictionofdentalcariesdevelopmentin1-year-oldchildren,”Caries Research29,no.5(1995):343-348.7S.R.Saemundssonetal.,“Thebasisforclinicians’cariesriskgroupinginchildren,”Pediatric Dentistry19,no.5(1997):331-338.8A.Wandera,S.Bhakta,andT.Barker,“Cariespredictionandindicatorsusingapediatricriskassessmentteachingtool,”ASDC Journal of DentistryforChildren67,no.6(2000):408-412,375.9L.K.Wendt,A.L.Hallonsten,andG.Koch,“Oralhealthinpre-schoolchildrenlivinginSweden.PartIII--Alongitudinalstudy.Riskanalysesbasedoncariesprevalenceat3yearsofageandimmigrantstatus,”Swedish Dental Journal23,no.1(1999):17-25.10JoelH.BergandRebeccaL.Slayton,eds.,Early childhood oral health(Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009).11S.Feitosa,V.Colares,andJ.Pinkham,“Thepsychosocialeffectsofseverecariesin4-year-oldchildreninRecife,Pernambuco,Brazil,”Cad.Saude Publica21,no.5(2005):1550-1556.12S.LFilstrupetal.,“Earlychildhoodcariesandqualityoflife:Childandparentperspectives,”Pediatric dentistry25,no.5(2003):431–440.13N.M.Nuttalletal.,“ThereportedimpactoforalconditiononchildrenintheUnitedKingdom,2003,”Br DentJ200,no.10(2006):551-556.14R.R.Patel,R.Tootla,andM.R.Inglehart,“Doesoralhealthaffectselfperceptions,parentalratingsandvideo-basedassessmentsofchildren’ssmiles?,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology35,no.1(2007):44-52.15H.Yusufetal.,“ValidationofanEnglishversionoftheChild-OIDPindex,anoralhealth-relatedqualityoflifemeasureforchildren,”Health and Quality of Life Outcomes4(2006):38.16L.A.FosterPageetal.,“ValidationoftheChildPerceptionsQuestionnaire(CPQ11-14),”Journal of Dental Research84,no.7(2005):649-652.17D.Locker,“Disparitiesinoralhealth-relatedqualityoflifeinapopulationofCanadianchildren,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology35,no.5(2007):348-356.
page2
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
TherelationshipbetweenSESandECCappearstobeconsistentacrossmultiplemeasuresofSES,includingTownsend’andJarman’sSESscores,18,19whichrelatetoneighbourhood-levelcharacteristicssuchasunemployment,homeownership,householdswithchildrenunder5years,singleparentfamilies,andfirstgenerationcitizens.TherelationshipbetweenSESanddentalhealthalsoholdsstrongacrossindividual-levelmeasuressuchaseducationalattainment,20ethnicityandhouseholdincome(basedontheUSNationalHealthandNutritionExaminationSurvey).21
InBC,alargenumberofchildrenexperiencedentaldecaybeforekindergartenandrequireimmediatetreatment.Duetochallengesinprovidingdentaltreatmentforyoungchildren(e.g.,levelsofchildfearandcooperationduringdentalvisits),suchtreatmentofteninvolvestheuseofgeneralanestheticservicesinhospitalsettings.In2002,resultsfromthepublichealthvisualdentalsurveyindicatedthat41percentofchildrensurveyedinBChadexperiencedsomeformofdentalcariesbythetimetheyreachedkindergarten.22ThisisconsistentwithfindingsrelatedtoearlychilddevelopmentoutcomesinBCindicatingthatahighproportion(one-quarter)ofyoungchildrenintheprovincewasdevelopmentallyat-riskorvulnerablein2001-2004.23
Whilechildhoodtoothdecayiscommon,itisalsopreventable;thediseaseismultifactorialinnaturebuttheextentornumberofteethaffectedcanbeinfluencedbypreventivemeasures.Earlyinterventionprogramsareanimportantelementofdentalpublichealthservicedeliveryastheyseektoincreasethepotentialforchildrentoremaindiseasefree.Duetoitsimpactonhealthandtheinequitiesinaccesstoregularpreventiveandrestorativedentalcare,thepreventionofdentaldiseasesisacorefunctionofpublichealthInBC,anddentalhealthisrecognizedasoneofthecoreprogramsforpublichealthservicesacrosstheprovince.24TheModelCoreProgramPaperforDentalPublicHealth(2006)25providesdirectionforpublichealthpreventionservicesinBC,identifyingthreecorefunctionsforthedeliveryofdentalpublichealthprograms:
1. Dentalhealthpromotion.2. Preventionofdentaldisease,withafocusonpreventionofchildhooddentaldiseases.
3. Surveillance,assessmentandevaluationofchildhooddentalhealthstatusanddentalhealthprograms.
Inordertoimprovethedentalhealthstatusofyoungchildren,theBCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramsaimto:(a)provideuniversalaccesstoearlyassessmentforchildrenunderagesixand(b)identifychildrenneedingdentaltreatment(seeFigure1).
18C.M.JonesandH.Worthington,“Fluoridation:Therelationshipbetweenwaterfluoridationandsocioeconomicdeprivationontoothdecayin5-year-oldchildren,”Br Dent J186,no.8(1999):397-400.19C.M.Jonesetal.,“Waterfluoridation,toothdecayin5yearolds,andsocialdeprivationmeasuredbytheJarmanscore:analysisofdatafromBritishdentalsurveys,”BMJ315,no.7107(1997):514-517.20A.IsmailandW.Sohn,“Theimpactofuniversalaccesstodentalcareondisparitiesincariesexperienceinchildren,”Journal of the American Dental Association132,no.3(2001):295-303.21C.M.Vargas,J.J.Crall,andD.A.Schneider,“Sociodemographicdistributionofpediatricdentalcaries:NHANESIII,1988-1994,”J.Am.Dent.Assoc.129,no.9(1998):1229-1238.22BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealth,British Columbia’s School Screening Dental Program, A Regional and Provincial Analysis(Victoria,BC:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealth,2003).23P.W.Kershawetal.,“TheBritishColumbiaAtlasofChildDevelopment,”Canadian Western Geographical Series40(2005):1203-1178. 24BCMinistryofHealth,The Evidence Base for Preventive Strategies in Dental Public Health,EvidenceReview(Victoria,BC:BCMinistryofHealth,2006).25P.Pallan,L.Siebold,andM.Hollander,Model Core Program Paper for Dental Public Health(Victoria,BC:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealth,2006).
page3
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Figure 1. BC Early Childhood Dental Health Programs26
26InformationintheabovefigureisrepresentativeofBCearlychildhooddentalprogramsasof2008(adaptedfromFigure1inthereportDental Health of BC Children in Relation to Social Determinants and Early Child Development: Analysis and Mapping of the 2006/07 British Columbia Kindergarten Dental Survey).
Dental Health Risk Assessment
Assessmentsarecompletedtodetermineriskforearlychildhooddentaldecay.Questionstypicallyrelatetodentistvisits,sibling/parentdentaldecay,toothbrushing,useoffluoridetoothpaste,feedingpractices,andbarrierstoaccess.
Assessmentmayinclude:• 1-to-1educationtoparentsemphasizingkeymessagesrelatedto:dentistvisits,signsofdecay,toothbrushing,useoffluoridetoothpaste,feedingpractices,andlow-costtreatmentoptions.
• Dentalandnutritionhandoutsandtoothbrushes(asavailable).
• Referralforadditionalassessmentanddentistasappropriate.
• ReferraltoFluorideVarnishProgram(seebelow)forchildrenathighriskofdentaldecay.
Selected Examples of Dental Health Risk Assessment Tools
•ToothTalkQuestionnaire(IHA)•12-MonthQuestionnaire(conductedbymailwithatelephonefollow-upquestionnaire)andChildHealthClinics(CHCs)at12-monthimmunizations(NHA).
•PublicHealthNurse(PHN)RiskAssessmentfordevelopingcavitiesatChildHealthClinics(CHC),andPHNIntegratedriskscreeningatCHCs(VIHA).
Fluoride Varnish Program
Dentalstaffprovidefluoridevarnishtochildrenagedfiveandunderthathavebeenassessedathighriskfordentaldecay.Thevarnishtakesjustafewminutestoputontheteeth,andcanhelppreventtoothdecayfromstartingandslowtheprogressionofexistingdecay.Applicationsaretypicallydoneinonetofourshortappointments,buttheremaybeuptosixapplicationsdependingonthechild’sneeds.Fluoridevarnishapplicationsareprovidedalongwithariskassessmentandone-to-oneeducationwiththeparent(s)and/orguardian(s).
Kindergarten Dental Survey
DentalstaffuseasmalllightandtonguedepressortoperformthesurveyonKindergartenstudents,inorderto:• Identifydentalhealthproblemsinchildren;• Collectdatatoidentifyprovincialtrendsindentalhealth;• DeterminetheprevalenceofdentaldecayinBC;and• Identifycasesforreferraland,insomeregions,facilitateaccesstotreatment(whenrequired).
Birt
hK
inde
rgar
ten
page4
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Figure1aboveprovidesinformationaboutthevariousprogramsandservicesthatcompriseBC’sEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms.Attheregionallevel,dentalpublichealthprogramscanbedeliveredinvariouswaystomeetuniqueneedswithineachhealthauthority.
The Dental Health Risk Assessment Programsinvolveassessmentofyoungchildrenaswellaschildreninvulnerablepopulations.Theassessment,oftenreferredtoasaCariesRiskAssessment(CRA),providesdentalprogramstaffwithopportunitiestoprovidepreventiveeducationtofamilies.Theriskassessmenttypicallyinvolvesparentsandfamiliescompletinganassessmentrelatedtoearlyidentificationofcaries,appropriateoralhealthpractices,andaccesstoservices.Ifdeemedappropriate,programstaffreferfamiliestothefluoridevarnishprogramortothedentistfordiagnosisandtreatment.
The BC Kindergarten Dental Survey (formerlyknownastheBCSchoolDentalScreeningProgram)wasintroducedin1990.UnderthePublicHealthDentalProgram,registeredDentalHygienistsandCertifiedDentalAssistantsperformavisualcheckfordentaldecayinkindergartenchildrenbetweentheagesof4and6.Itisimportanttonotethatthischeckdoesnotreplacearegulardentalexam.Thepurposeofthesurveyistodeterminetheprevalenceofobviousorvisibledentaldecay,toidentifytrendsindentalhealth,andwherepossible,toobtainameasureoftheeffectivenessofearlychildhoodpreventionactivitiesonthismultifactorialdisease.Thesurveyhasalsobeenusedinsomeregionstoidentifycasesforreferralandfacilitateaccesstotreatmentwhenrequired.
page5
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
BC EARLY CHILDHOOD DENTAL PROGRAMS LOGIC MODEL
Alogicmodelapproachenhancestheclarityandusefulnessoftheevaluationbyfocusingonissues(andoutcomes)ofvaluetothevariouspartiesinvolvedwithorpotentiallyinfluencedbytheprogrambeingexamined.ThelogicmodelpresentedinFigure2(seebelow)providesasystematicwayofexaminingrelationshipsamongtheresourcesdedicatedtoBC’sDentalPrograms,theactivitiesthatareundertaken,andthechangesorresultsthatareachieved(oranticipated).Themodelillustratesthefollowing:
• Resourcesneededtoaccomplishprogramactivitiesandinfluentialfactors,• Activitiestobeaccomplishedbytheprogram,• Outputsorimmediateresultstheactivitieswillproduce,• Short and long-term outcomesexpected,and• Longer-termimpactsoftheaccomplishedactivities.
Eachofthesefivecomponentsillustratestheconnectionbetweentheeffortsandworkthatgointoprogramoperationsandtheintendedresults.Thislogicmodelprovidedacommonstartingpointfordiscussionoftheprioritiesfortheevaluationprojectandinturnthedevelopmentofthefouroverarchingevaluationquestions.
Thelogicmodelwasusedtodevelopamulti-phaseevaluationplan,includingelementsofclarification,interactive,monitoring,andimpactevaluation.27Clarificationevaluationaimstomakeexplicittheessentialfeaturesoftheprogram,whileinteractiveevaluationassistsprogramplannerstomakedecisionsaboutwaystoimprovetheprogram.Monitoringallowsforevaluationofthecurrentstateofaprogram,whileimpactevaluationassessestheeffectsofprogramactivitiesontargetpopulationsovertime.Throughouttheprocess,autilization-focusedapproachwasalsoemployedtogivecarefulconsiderationforhowintendeduserswouldapplyevaluationfindings.28
Whiletheoriginallogicmodelandevaluationquestionsencompassedcontext,activities,andoutcomes,thedatacollectionultimatelycenteredonprogramactivitiesandimplementation(clarification,interactive,andmonitoringevaluation),ratherthaneffectivenessandoutcomes(impactevaluation).TheprimaryfocusofdatacollectionwastheBCSchoolDentalScreeningProgramintroducedin1990,aswellasthedentalhealthriskassessmentprojectsinitiatedin1996.29Ouranalysiscenteredontwoprimarydatasets:thestatisticsgatheredfromthe2006/07and2009/10BCKindergartenDentalSurveysandthequalitativedatagatheredfromfocusgroupswithpublichealthdentalstaff.
27J.Owen,Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches(NewYork,NY:GuilfordPress,2006).28MichaelPatton,Utilization-focused evaluation,4thed.(ThousandOaksCalif.:SagePublications,2008). 29Inthisevaluationproject,dentalhealthriskassessmentreferstocariesriskassessmentaswellasthedentalhealthassessmentportionofearlychildhoodhealthassessment.Cariesriskassessment(CRA)referstothedeterminationofthelikelihoodoftheincidenceofcaries.InBChealthauthorities,dentalstaffplayacentralroleincariesriskassessment,whilePublicHealthNursesprovideearlychildhoodhealthassessmentsandmakeappropriatereferralstodentalstaff.
page6
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Figure 2. 2007 BC Early Childhood Dental Programs Logic Model
page7
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
EVALUATION MEASURES AND METHODS
Defining and Measuring Early Childhood CariesResearchershavenotedthatcautionshouldbeexercisedwhencomparingtheprevalenceofearlychildhoodcariesfoundindifferentstudiesbecausedifferentdiagnosticcriteriaareused.30‘TheoverallreportedprevalenceofECCvariesdramaticallydependingoncasedefinition,populationstudied,andresearchmethodsemployed.’31TheAmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistry(AAPD)definesECCas‘theoccurrenceofatleastoneprimarytoothaffectedbydecayinachildunder6yearsofage.32AlthoughtheAAPDclearlydefinesthemeaningofECC,themechanismsfordeterminingthepresenceofECCstillvary.Forinstance,theWorldHealthOrganization’s(WHO’s)standardforsurveyingearlychildhoodcariesistheDMFT/DMFS(Decayed,Missing,orFilledTeethorSurfaces);however,thistypeofdatacollectiontypicallyinvolvesaclinicalsettingandisthusnotalwaysconducivetolargepopulationsurveys,suchastheoneinBC,whichsurveysmorethan35,000childreneachyear.Instead,aBasicScreeningSurvey(BSS)isusedinBCtoassesstheoralhealthstatusofitspopulationofyoungchildren.TheBSShasalsobeenutilizedintheUSasacheckfordecayexperience:33
“For its studies of decay experience in young children, the U.S. federal government…counts children as having decay experience only if they have one or more visible cavities (without radiographs), have one or more visible fillings, or have one or more teeth missing because of decay. White spots, even if readily evident, are not counted…” (p. 31).34
TheBSSprovidesaframeworkforobtainingoralhealthdatathatisinexpensive,easytoimplementandconsistent.35TheinformationgatheredisatalevelconsistentwithmonitoringnationalhealthobjectivesfoundintheUSPublicHealthService’sHealthyPeopledocument.AlthoughthereislittleresearchonthevalidityandreliabilityoftheBSSmeasure,a1994studyof632elementaryschoolchildreninGeorgia,USfoundhighvalidityforcariesandtreatmentneeds(>90%sensitivity,specificity,andpredictivevaluesinasamplehaving30%to40%prevalence).36TheBSShasbeennotedtobeaquickerandmorecost-efficientmethodofcollectingdataonearlychildhoodcariesinlieuofmoreformalepidemiologicalsurveysusingtheDMFT/DMFS.37, 38
AppendixCprovidesabriefsummaryofselectedstudiesofECCprevalencebasedontheBSSinvariouspopulations.AllUSjurisdictionsusedindicatorsandcriteriafromtheBSSmanualdevelopedbytheAssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors(includingadditionalcodingoptions).39InBC,theBritishColumbia30S.Peressinietal.,“Prevalenceofdentalcariesamong7-and13-year-oldFirstNationschildren,DistrictofManitoulin,Ontario,”J.Can.Dent.Assoc.70,no.6(2004):382. 31BergandSlayton,Early childhood oral health.32AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistry,“Oralhealthpolicies,”Pediatric Dentistry26,no.7(2004):16-61. 33BCMinistryofHealth,Evidence review: Dental public health(Victoria,BC:BCMinistryofHealth,2006),http://www.vch.ca/media/Evidence_Review_Dental.pdf.34BergandSlayton,Early childhood oral health.35Ibid. 36E.D.Beltrán-Aguilar,D.M.Malvitz,andS.A.Eklund,“Validityoftwomethodsforassessingoralhealthstatusofpopulations,”Journal of Public Health Dentistry57,no.4(1997):206-214.37AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,Basic screening surveys: An approach to monitoring community oral health(Sparks,NV:AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,1999).38E.Beltrán-Aguilaretal.,“Oralhealthsurveillance:Past,present,andfuturechallenges,”Journal of Public Health Dentistry63,no.3(2003):141-149.39AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,Basic screening surveys: An approach to monitoring community oral health.
page8
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
publichealthdentalprogramsstafffollowascreeningmanual,whichwasdevelopedin1990andlateradaptedbytheBCDentalPublicHealthCommittee(BCDPHC).40 ThismanualcoversindicatorsandcriteriawhichareconsistentwiththeBSSmanual,aswellasadditionaltrainingmaterialsandtopicsrelevanttotheBCcontext(e.g.,self-studysheets,documentationandprivacystandards,regulationofdentalpersonnel,low-costdentalclinics).
The Kindergarten Dental Survey in British Columbia: A Brief OverviewTheKindergartenDentalSurveyisadministeredbypublichealthdentalstaff(registeredDentalHygienistsandCertifiedDentalAssistants)whoperformavisualinspectionofeachkindergartenchild’smouthwithasmalllightandtonguedepressortodeterminethepresenceofobviousorvisibletoothdecay.Dentalprogramstafffollowacalibrationprocesstoensureconsistenttechnique.Theyinspectkindergartenchildren’smouthsforbrokenenamel,existingrestorations,andurgenttreatmentneeds.Aftertheinspection,childrenareclassifiedasbelongingtooneofthefollowingthreeoralhealthoutcomes:
Code 1: No Visible Decay Experience:ChildrenwithNoVisibleDecayorrestorations.
Code 2: No Visible Decay; Has Treatment:ChildrenthathaveNoVisibleDecaybutdohaveexistingrestorations(e.g.,fillingsorcrowns).41
Code 3: Visible Decay:Childrenthathaveobviousdecayasevidencedbybrokenenamel.Shadowingwithoutbrokenenamelisnotconsideredvisibledecay.
Inaddition,afourthcodeexists,whichcanapplytoanyofthedentalcodesabove:
Code 4: Urgent Treatment Needs:Childreninneedofimmediatedentalcare(e.g.,achildwhoisinobviouspainatthetimeofthesurveyorhasobviousvisibleinfectionasevidencedbyanabscess,grossswelling,orthepresenceofpus).
Inotherwords,astudentcanhave‘urgenttreatmentneeds’(Code04)despitehavingnovisibledecay(Code01).Studentswhohavehadprevioustreatment(Code02)orwhohavevisibledecay(Code03)canalsohaveurgenttreatmentneeds(Code04).Numerically,thesumofCodes01to03shouldbeequaltothenumberofkindergartenstudentssurveyed.
BC’sHealthAuthoritiesconductedthefirstfull-scaleimplementationoftheKindergartenDentalSurveyduringthe2006/07schoolyearwithanestimated35,602kindergartenstudents.TheKindergartenDentalSurveywasre-administeredin2009/10withapproximately35,215kindergartenstudentsfrompublic,independentandFirstNationsschoolsonReserve.
Inbothsurveyyears,BC’sKindergartenDentalSurveyreachedapproximately9outof10enrolledstudents.Table1displaysthenumberofstudentssurveyedandenrolledbyhealthauthority(HA)andhealthservicedeliveryarea(HSDA)forBritishColumbiain2006/07and2009/10.
40BritishColumbiaDentalPublicHealthCommittee,Dental Screening Manual,2006.41Notethatduetothenatureofthesurveytooluseditisbecomingincreasinglydifficulttoidentifyallrestoredteeth(e.g.whitecolouredfillings)Wyman,T.(PersonalCommunication,2011).
page9
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
• NorthernHealthAuthorityshowedthelargestpercentincreaseamongthehealthauthoritiesintermsofsurveycoverage,with91.0%ofkindergartenstudentssurveyedin2006/07and95.3%(+4.3percentagepoints)in2009/10.
• TheNorthernInteriorshowedthelargestpercentincreaseinsurveycoverageamongallhealthservicedeliveryareas(HSDAs).In2006/07,86.5%ofkindergartenstudentsweresurveyed;94.4%weresurveyedin2009/10(+7.8percentagepoints).
HealthAuthorityinformationissummarizedinFigure3below.
Environmental ScanIn2008,aspartofanongoingenvironmentalscanofBCearlychildhooddentalprograms,HELPreviewedthedentalhealthriskassessmenttools,guidelinesusedineachHealthAuthority,aswellasover100HealthAuthorityhandoutsrelatedtooralhealthandnutritionforchildrenunderage6.Fivemaintopicsemergedfromreviewofthecontentofthesematerials:dentalvisits,previous/familytoothdecay,toothbrushingandfluoride,feedingpractices,andsocioeconomicstatus.ConsultationswithdentalstaffwerealsoconductedtoidentifytherangeofdentalhealthriskassessmentstrategiesusedacrossHealthAuthorities.Theinformationgatheredwasusedtoaddressevaluationquestionsrelatedtoprogramactivities,aswellastoinformthedesignoffocusgroupswithpublichealthdentalstaff(forfurtherdetails,seeDentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroupsProvincialAnalysis).
Table 1. BC Kindergarten Dental Survey Coverage for Health Regions by Survey Year Surveyed Enrolled* % SurveyedHA and Health Region 06-07 09-10 06-07 09-10 06-07 09-10Fraser 14,256 13,660 15,502 15,060 92.0 90.7East 2,788 2,649 2,820 2,867 98.9 92.4North 4,775 4,716 5,247 5,189 91.0 90.9South 6,693 6,295 7,435 7,004 90.0 89.9Interior 5,465 5,574 6,016 6,146 90.8 90.7TheKootenays 1,224 1,296 1,370 1,434 89.3 90.4Okanagan 2,543 2,542 2,787 2,769 91.2 91.8TCS 1,698 1,736 1,859 1,943 91.3 89.3Northern 2,769 2,980 3,044 3,126 91.0 95.3Northeast 810 769 853 804 95.0 95.6NorthernInterior 1,306 1,313 1,509 1,391 86.5 94.4Northwest 653 898 682 931 95.7 96.5VancouverCoastal 7,799 7,681 8,468 8,423 92.1 91.2Vancouver 4,072 3,918 4,444 4,400 91.6 89.0Richmond 1,473 1,520 1,600 1,626 92.1 93.5Coastal 2,254 2,243 2,424 2,397 93.0 93.6VancouverIsland 5,313 5,320 5,861 5,922 90.7 89.8South 2,498 2,556 2,746 2,856 91.0 89.5Central 1,825 1,765 2,030 1,979 89.9 89.2North 990 999 1,085 1,087 91.2 91.9
BC(Total) 35,602 35,215 38,891 38,677 91.5 91
*Sourceofenrollmentfigures:BCHealthAuthorities.
page10
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Focus Groups with Public Health Dental StaffFocusgroupswereconductedinthesummerof2009withpublichealthdentalstaffacrosstheprovinceinorderto:identifytherangeofdentalhealthriskassessmentstrategiesusedinHealthAuthorities;understandkeybarrierstoprogramreach;andreflectuponkeysuccessfactorsandhowtheprogramscouldbeimproved.ThefocusgroupprocesswasdevelopedincollaborationwithHealthAuthorityrepresentativesandtheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramsEvaluationSubcommittee.Questionsdevelopedforthefocusgroupsparticipantsexploredissuessuchasimplementationofassessmentguidelines,barrierstopublichealthdentalprogramreach,lessonslearned,andregionally-developedquestionsofinterest.
Eightfocusgroupswereconductedwithatotalof61publichealthdentalstaff,representing72%ofpublichealthdentalstaffacrosstheprovince.FromacrossthefiveHealthAuthorities,participantsincluded33DentalHygienists,24CertifiedDentalAssistants,oneDentist,andthreeprogrampartnerstaff(e.g.,FirstNationsHealthStaff).AllparticipantswereknowledgeableinformersduetotheperspectivesgainedfromtheirpersonalexperienceandobservationslivingandworkinginBCandtakingpartinimplementationofaHealthAuthorityearlychildhooddentalprogram.Mostparticipantshadworkedindentalpublichealthformanyyearswhileafewhadonlyrecentlybecomeengagedinpublichealth,andmanyreportedthattheyalsohadexperienceworkinginprivatedentalpractices.Onaverage,participantshad15yearsofdentalpublichealthexperience(rangingfrom0to38years).
Figure 3. BC Kindergarten Dental Survey Coverage by Health Authority
page11
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Basedonpriorconsultationwithdentalstaff,focusgroupfacilitatorsfromHELPdevelopedprogramimplementationprocessdiagramsforeachHealthAuthority,whichwerereviewedandrevisedduringthefocusgroups.Eachfocusgroupwastranscribedverbatim.Transcriptswereanalyzedusingconstantcomparativetechniquestocategorizethedataintokeythemes.42Forfurtherdetails,see:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroupsProvincialAnalysis.
Provincial and Regional MappingTheKindergartenDentalSurveydatawasalsousedinconjunctionwithdatafromthe2004Taxfilerdataset,the2006CensusandWave3oftheEarlyDevelopmentInstrument(2007-2009)datasetinordertocreateaseriesofprovincialandregionalmapstovisuallyrepresentdentalhealthoutcomes.Theproducedmapstypicallyusedpiechartstoshowthedistributionofkindergartenchildrenfromeachschooldistrictineachofthefourdentaloutcomecategories.Aswell,themapsweretypicallycolour-codedaccordingto‘quintiles’ofvulnerabilityintheprovince.Geocodingwasusedinthemappingprocessbyassigningageographicalcoordinate(latitude-longitude)toanaddress,andthendisplayingtheaddressonamaporusingitinaspatialsearch.ThemappingfeatureoftheevaluationprocessallowedHELPtovisuallydepictregional,schooldistrict,andneighbourhoodvariationindentaldecayforthehealthauthorities.Additionally,HELPwasalsoabletocreateseveralmapsvisuallyrepresentingthecorrelationsbetweenearlychildhoodcariesandseveralsocioeconomicstatusvariables.
42Aqualitativemethod(groundedtheory)wasusedtoanalyzethedata.Thegoalofthistypeofanalysisisnottoconductcountsorquantify;rather,theaimistoprovideadescriptiveaccountofparticipantexperiencesandperspectivesasvoicedthroughthefocusgroups.
page12
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
EVALUATION FINDINGS
Thefindingsfromtheevaluationprojectareorganizedaccordingtothefouroverarchingevaluationquestionsandinturnthefollowingfourkeythemes:
1. EarlyChildhoodDentalHealthSurveillance2. RiskAssessment3. HealthPromotionandPreventionStrategies;and4. BuildingPartnerships.
page13
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
EARLY CHILDHOOD DENTAL HEALTH SURVEILLANCE
Thefirstkeythemeofsurveillanceisrelatedtotheinitialevaluationframeworkquestion:
1. Is the oral health of young children improving? By community? By vulnerability?Todetermineiftheoralhealthofyoungchildren(age4-6)inBCisimproving,wepresentfindingsfromthe2006/07and2009/10KindergartenDentalSurveysfortheprovince,healthauthorities,healthregions(healthservicedeliveryareas)andHELPneighbourhoods(seeAppendixDformoreinformationon“HELPneighbourhoods”)withrespecttothefollowing:
a. EarlyChildhoodCaries(ECC)rates,definedasthepercentofkindergartenchildrensurveyedwithcurrentorpreviousdecay,andchangesintheseratesovertime.43
b. Socioeconomicinfluencesonearlychildhoodoralhealth,includingOn-andOff-Diagonalrelationships(i.e.,neighbourhoodswithhighECCdespitehavinghighsocioeconomicstandingorlow-socioeconomicneighbourhoodswithlowratesofECC).
c. TherelationshipbetweenECCanddevelopmentalvulnerabilityasmeasuredbytheEDI(EarlyDevelopmentInstrument).
43Pleasenotethatinthecontextofthisproject,wearereferringtoCodes02+03asindicatorsofdecayexperience.Thesecodesreflectthedentaldecaythatisvisiblethroughavisualcheckratherthanthedentaldecay(observableandnon-observable)thatwouldbedetectablethroughmoresensitiveclinicalassessmenttools.
Accordingtoanalysisoftheresultsfromthe2006/07and2009/10KindergartenDentalSurveys,theoralhealthofyoungchildreninBCappearstohaveimprovedoverall,andregionaldifferenceswereidentifiedintermsofdentalhealth.
• In2006/07,61.1%ofkindergartenstudentssurveyedinBChadnovisibledecay(Code01);in2009/10,thepercentageincreasedto63.3%,whichis3.3%abovetheprovincialtargetof60%.
• 942fewerkindergartenchildrenwereidentifiedashavingvisibledentaldecayin2009/10thanin2006/07inBC.387fewerchildrenweresurveyedin2009/10thanin2006/07.
• ThegreatestimprovementswereobservedintheInterior,wherethe%VisibleDentalDecay(Code02+03)decreasedfrom40.2%in2006/07to36.1%in2009/10,andinVancouverCoastalhealthauthority,whichexperienceda5.8%decrease(40.9%in2006/07to35.1%in2009/10).
KEY
FIN
DIN
GS
page14
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Early Childhood Caries in British Columbia’s Health Authorities and Health Regions Overall,theoralhealthofkindergartenchildrenshowedslightimprovementsbetweensurveyyears.In2006/07,61.1%ofstudentssurveyedhadnovisibledecay(Code01);in2009/10,thepercentageincreasedto63.3%,whichis3.3%abovetheprovincialtargetof60%.
• ThegreatestimprovementswereobservedintheInterior,wherethepercentCode01increasedfrom59.8%in2006/07to63.9%in2009/10,andinVancouverCoastalHA,whichexperienced5.8%increase(59.1%in2006/07to64.9%in2009/10).
• AmongHSDAs,thepercentCode01intheNorthwestwas49.3%in2006/07and53.7%in2009/10;intheCoastalRegionofVCHA,72.4%ofchildrenhadnovisibledecayin2006/07and78.8%werecaries-freein2009/10.
• Thehighestratesintermsoffillingsorotherrestorations(Code02)werefoundinFraserEastin2006/07(26.6%)andtheNorthwestin2009/10(24.8%);andthelowestratesforCode02acrosssurveyyearswerefoundinVancouverCoastalHSDA(17.7%in2006/07and14.1%in2009/10).
• VancouverCoastalHSDAhadthelowestratesforCode03whereasThompsonCaribooShuswap,RichmondandNorthwestHSDAsshowedrelativelyhighratesofcurrentdecay(>25%)in2006/07andretainedthehighestratesofcurrentdecayrelativetootherHSDAsin2009/10;ratesofcurrentvisibledecayforallthreeareasdroppedslightlyin2009/10toapproximately22%.Table2.1presentsthepercentofstudentssurveyedbyCodeforHAsandHSDAsin2006/07and2009/10.Anadditionalcolumnispresentedinthetablecalled“%VisibleDentalDecay,”whichisthesumofCodes02and03(includingCode04s)ortheinverseofCode01.This
• Dentaloutcomesofchildrendifferbygeographiclocation(e.g.,byneighbourhood):- TsawwassenNorthexperiencedthelargestincreaseinvisibledentaldecaybetweensurveyyearsfrom10.96%in2006/07to46.77%in2009/10.
- ThevisibledentaldecayrateoftheOkanagan’sSouthWestneighbourhoodwascutinhalfbetweenKindergartenDentalSurveyyears.
- 72neighbourhoodsdecreasedinvisibledentaldecayand47neighbourhoodsincreasedinvisibledentaldecayfrom2006/07to2009/10.
- 10neighbourhoodsexperienceda25%decreaseinthenumberofchildrenidentifiedashavingvisibledentaldecay.
- 4neighbourhoodsexperienceda25%increaseinthenumberofchildrenidentifiedashavingvisibledentaldecay.
Andbythesocioeconomicstatusoftheneighbourhood:- Childrenfromsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoodstendtohavehigherratesofvisibledentaldecaythanthoseinmoreadvantagedsocioeconomicneighbourhoods;however,thehighestabsolutenumberofchildrenwithvisibledentaldecayresidesinmid-levelsocioeconomicneighbourhoods.
KEY
FIN
DIN
GS
page15
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
variabledefinesourmaindentaloutcomemeasureinthestatisticalanalysispresentedtofollow.Figure4presentsHealthAuthorityratesforeachofthedentalcodesaswell.
• Table2.2presentskindergartendentalhealthoutcomedatabycodeforthe2006/07surveyyear,andTable2.3presentsthisinformationfor2009/10.
• Inaddition,thetablespresentthenumberofstudentswithnodentaldecay(Code01),whichareestimatesbasedonthenumberofstudentssurveyedinthehealthregion.Table2.4presentsthepercentagechangebetweensurveyyearsalongwiththenumberofkindergartenchildren(K)affectedbythischange.
• Overall,theprovincialrateofkindergartenvisibledentaldecay(Code02+03)droppedbetweensurveyyearsby2.2percentagepoints,from38.9%in2006/07(seeTable2.1or2.2)to36.7%in2009/10(seeTable2.1or2.3).
• Intermsofthenumberofkindergartenchildrenaffectedbythispercentagechange,942fewerkindergartenchildrenwereidentifiedashavingvisibledentaldecayin2009/10thanin2006/07intheprovinceofBC.
Table 2.1. Kindergarten Dental Health Outcomes by Survey Year for Health Regions
HA and Health Region
% Code 01 % Code 02 % Code 03 % Code 04
% Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
06-07 09-10 06-07 09-10 06-07 09-10 06-07 09-70 06-07 09-10
Fraser 61.6 62.3 22.5 20.3 16.0 17.4 1.6 2.2 38.4 37.7
FraserEast 62.4 63.3 26.4 23.2 11.2 13.5 0.6 0.6 37.6 36.7
FraserNorth 65.8 65.0 23.2 21.1 11.0 13.9 1.5 1.9 34.2 35.0
FraserSouth 58.1 59.8 20.3 18.6 21.5 21.6 2.2 3.1 41.9 40.2
Interior 59.8 63.9 20.7 18.2 19.5 17.9 3.5 3.1 40.2 36.1
TheKootenays 60.6 67.7 19.9 16.1 19.5 16.1 4.2 2.8 39.4 32.3
Okanagan 64.1 66.8 20.1 16.9 15.8 16.3 2.6 3.1 35.9 33.2
TCS 52.7 56.8 22.3 21.8 25.0 21.4 4.4 3.2 47.3 43.2
Northern 58.8 58.8 18.5 21.4 22.7 19.7 3.5 3.2 41.2 41.1
Northeast 58.9 58.0 19.3 21.5 21.9 20.4 2.8 2.3 41.1 41.9
NorthernInterior 63.6 62.8 18.2 19.0 18.2 18.1 2.6 3.7 36.4 37.2
Northwest 49.3 53.7 17.9 24.8 32.8 21.5 6.0 3.0 50.7 46.3
VancouverCoastal 59.1 64.9 20.5 18.3 20.4 16.8 1.8 1.3 40.9 35.1
Vancouver 54.7 59.9 22.4 19.8 22.9 20.3 2.0 1.5 45.3 40.1
Richmond 51 57.1 19.5 20.7 29.5 22.2 3.7 2.0 49.0 42.9
Coastal 72.4 78.8 17.7 14.1 9.9 7.1 0.3 0.4 27.6 21.2
VancouverIsland 65.1 65.5 23.6 20.7 11.3 13.8 1.2 1.1 34.9 34.5
SouthVancouverIsland 69.1 69.1 21.5 18.2 9.4 12.7 1.8 1.0 30.9 30.9
CentralVancouverIsland 60.9 62.0 26.6 23 12.5 14.9 0.5 1.4 39.1 37.9
NorthVancouverIsland 62.4 62.3 23.6 22.8 13.9 14.7 0.9 0.8 37.6 37.5
BC(Total) 61.1 63.3 21.6 19.7 17.3 17.0 2.0 2.1 38.9 36.7
Note:Cellvaluesarecolourcodedtocorrespondtotherangesofvaluesaspresentedintheattachedmappingpackage.Seelegendformoredetails.
page16
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Figure 4. Kindergarten Dental Health Outcomes by Health Authority
Table 2.2. Kindergarten Dental Health Outcomes and Number of Kindergarten Students Surveyed in 2006/07 by Health Region
Health Authority & Health Service Delivery Area
Code 01 Code 02 Code 03 Code 04% Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
% K % K % K % K % KFraser 61.6 8775 22.5 3204 16.0 2277 1.6 234 38.4 5481
FraserEast 62.4 1740 26.4 737 11.2 311 0.6 16 37.6 1048
FraserNorth 65.8 3144 23.2 1106 11.0 525 1.5 71 34.2 1631
FraserSouth 58.1 3891 20.3 1361 21.5 1441 2.2 147 41.9 2802
Interior 59.8 3267 20.7 1132 19.5 1066 3.5 192 40.2 2198
TheKootenays 60.6 742 19.9 243 19.5 239 4.2 52 39.4 482
Okanagan 64.1 1631 20.1 510 15.8 402 2.6 66 35.9 912
TCS 52.7 894 22.3 379 25.0 425 4.4 74 47.3 804
Northern 58.8 1629 18.5 511 22.7 629 3.5 96 41.2 1140
Northeast 58.9 477 19.3 156 21.9 177 2.8 23 41.1 333
NorthernInterior 63.6 830 18.2 238 18.2 238 2.6 34 36.4 476
Northwest 49.3 322 17.9 117 32.8 214 6.0 39 50.7 331
VancouverCoastal 59.1 4610 20.5 1599 20.4 1590 1.8 143 40.9 3189
Vancouver 54.7 2228 22.4 912 22.9 932 2.0 81 45.3 1844
Richmond 51.0 751 19.5 287 29.5 435 3.7 55 49.0 722
Coastal 72.4 1631 17.7 400 9.9 223 0.3 7 27.6 623
VancouverIsland 65.1 3457 23.6 1255 11.3 601 1.2 62 34.9 1856SouthVancouverIsland 69.1 1727 21.5 536 9.4 235 1.8 44 30.9 771
CentralVancouverIsland 60.9 1112 26.6 485 12.5 228 0.5 9 39.1 713
NorthVancouverIsland 62.4 618 23.6 234 13.9 138 0.9 9 37.6 372
BC(Total) 61.1 21738 21.6 7701 17.3 6163 2.0 727 38.9 13864
page17
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Early Childhood Caries by School District and HELP Neighbourhoods HELPpreviouslyworkedcloselywithrepresentativesfromseveralBCcommunitiestoinformthecreationofHELPneighbourhoodswithgeographicboundariesdemarcatedbynaturalboundariesasperceivedbytheneighbourhood’sresidents.Severalfactorswereconsideredwhendefiningneighbourhoodboundariesincluding:
• naturalsocialandeconomicdivisionsincommunities.• naturalorotherphysicalboundariessuchasravines,waterways,majorhighways.
• localmunicipalboundaries(e.g.,municipalities,regionaldistricts).• schoolcatchmentareas.• neighbourhoodassociationboundaries.
Asaresultofthisprocess,HELPidentified478neighbourhoodsinBC,whichareanticipatedtoaccountforthelong-termanticipatedgrowthanddeclineinthepopulationpatternsofcommunities(seeAppendixDforfurtherdiscussionaboutthecreationofHELPneighbourhoods).
UsingschooldistrictsandHELPneighbourhoodsasboundaries,aMappingPackagewascreatedtopresentkindergartendentalsurveyoutcomesovertime(i.e.,in
Table 2.3. Kindergarten Dental Health Outcomes and Number of Kindergarten Students Surveyed in 2009/10 by Health Region
Health Authority & Health Service Delivery Area
Code 01 Code 02 Code 03 Code 04% VisibleDental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
% K % K % K % K % KFraser 62.3 8508 20.3 2777 17.4 2375 2.2 301 37.7 5152
FraserEast 63.3 1677 23.2 614 13.5 358 0.6 17 36.7 972
FraserNorth 65.0 3066 21.1 993 13.9 657 1.9 91 35.0 1650
FraserSouth 59.8 3765 18.6 1170 21.6 1360 3.1 193 40.2 2530
Interior 63.9 3562 18.2 1017 17.9 995 3.1 171 36.1 2012
TheKootenays 67.7 878 16.1 209 16.1 209 2.8 36 32.3 418
Okanagan 66.8 1698 16.9 430 16.3 414 3.1 80 33.2 844
TCS 56.8 986 21.8 378 21.4 372 3.2 55 43.2 750
Northern 58.8 1753 21.4 638 19.7 588 3.2 94 41.1 1226
Northeast 58.0 446 21.5 165 20.4 157 2.3 18 41.9 322
NorthernInterior 62.8 825 19.0 250 18.1 238 3.7 49 37.2 488
Northwest 53.7 482 24.8 223 21.5 193 3.0 27 46.3 416
VancouverCoastal 64.9 4983 18.3 1408 16.8 1290 1.3 99 35.1 2698
Vancouver 59.9 2347 19.8 777 20.3 794 1.5 58 40.1 1571
Richmond 57.1 868 20.7 315 22.2 337 2.0 31 42.9 652
Coastal 78.8 1768 14.1 316 7.1 159 0.4 10 21.2 475
VancouverIsland 65.5 3483 20.7 1099 13.8 735 1.1 58 34.5 1834
SouthVancouverIsland 69.1 1766 18.2 465 12.7 325 1.0 26 30.9 790
CentralVancouverIsland 62.0 1095 23.0 406 14.9 263 1.4 24 37.9 669
NorthVancouverIsland 62.3 622 22.8 228 14.7 147 0.8 8 37.5 375
BC(Total) 63.3 22289 19.7 6939 17.0 5983 2.1 723 36.7 12922
page18
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
2006/07and2009/10)andinrelationtosocioeconomicstatusfor59schooldistrictsand437HELPneighbourhoods.Figure5.1belowpresentsoneoftheprovincialmapscreatedtodepictdentaldecayforkindergartenstudents(byschooldistrict)in2009/10.
TheMappingPackage(seeAttached)presentsneighbourhood-leveldentalhealthoutcomesalongwithdemographicandsocioeconomicvariables.Threetypesofmapsarepresentedinthepackage:interactivemaps,provincialmaps,andhealthauthoritymaps:
1. Theinteractivemapsallowtheusertogenerateamaptailoredtoherorhisneedsusingoptionallayerssuchashealthauthorityboundaries,citynames,neighbourhoodnames,roads,socioeconomicstatusanddemographics,andearlychilddevelopmentdata;thesemapsenableuserstozoomintotheneighbourhoodlevel,orzoomouttotheprovinciallevel;
2. Theprovincialmapsshowdentaldecaybyschooldistrictateachofthefourcodelevels,aswellasthechangebetweenthe2006/07to2009/10data;andHealthauthorityspecificmapsshowdentaldecaybyneighbourhood,witheachofthefourcodelevels,aswellasthechangebetweenthe2006/07to2009/10data.
Table 2.4. Change in Kindergarten Dental Health Outcomes and Number of Kindergarten Students Affected by Health Region Health Authority & Health Service Delivery Area
Code 01 Code 02 Code 03 Code 04% Visible Dental Decay(Code 02 + 03)
% K % K % K % K % KFraser +0.7 -267 -2.2 -427 +1.4 +98 +0.6 +67 -0.7 -329
FraserEast +0.9 -63 -3.2 -123 +2.3 +47 0 +1 -0.9 -76
FraserNorth -0.8 -78 -2.1 -113 +2.9 +132 +0.4 +20 +0.8 +19
FraserSouth +1.7 -126 -1.7 -191 +0.1 -81 +0.9 +46 -1.7 -272
Interior +4.1 +295 -2.5 -115 -1.6 -71 -0.4 -21 -4.1 -186
TheKootenays +7.1 +136 -3.8 -34 -3.4 -30 -1.4 -16 -7.1 -64
Okanagan +2.7 +67 -3.2 -80 +0.5 +12 +0.5 +14 -2.7 -68
TCS +4.1 +92 -0.5 -1 -3.6 -53 -1.2 -19 -4.1 -54
Northern 0 +124 +2.9 127 -3.0 -41 -0.3 -2 -0.1 +86
Northeast -0.9 -31 +2.2 +9 -1.5 -20 -0.5 -5 +0.8 -11
NorthernInterior -0.8 -5 +0.8 +12 -0.1 0 +1.1 +15 +0.8 +12
Northwest +4.4 +160 +6.9 106 -11.3 -21 -3.0 -12 -4.4 +85
VancouverCoastal +5.8 +373 -2.2 -191 -3.6 -300 -0.5 -44 -5.8 -491
Vancouver +5.2 +119 -2.6 -135 -2.6 -138 -0.5 -23 -5.2 -273
Richmond +6.1 +117 +1.2 +28 -7.3 -98 -1.7 -24 -6.1 -70
Coastal +6.4 +137 -3.6 -84 -2.8 -64 +0.1 +3 -6.4 -148
VancouverIsland +0.4 +26 -2.9 -156 +2.5 +134 -0.1 -4 -0.4 -22
SouthVancouverIsland 0 +39 -3.3 -71 +3.3 +90 -0.8 -18 0 +19
CentralVancouverIsland +1.1 -17 -3.6 -79 +2.4 +35 +0.9 +15 -1.2 -44
NorthVancouverIsland -0.1 -4 -0.8 -6 +0.8 +9 -0.1 -1 -0.1 +3
BC(Total) 2.2 551 -1.9 -762 -0.3 -180 0.1 -4 -2.2 -942
page19
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Theprovincialandneighbourhood-levelmapsareaccompaniedbycomprehensivedatatablesthatpresentschooldistrict-andneighbourhood-leveldentalhealthoutcomes,indicatorsofsocioeconomicstatusandearlychilddevelopmentasmeasuredbytheEDIduringthe2007/08and2008/09schoolyears(Wave3).Thetablesincludedinthepackageincludeavariablecalled“%VisibleDentalDecayChange,”whichmeasuresthepercentincreaseordecreaseintherateofvisibledentaldecayfrom2006/07to2009/10.Thisvariablecanbeusedasageneralindicatoroftheoralhealthofyoungchildreninthecommunity(i.e.,neighbourhood).Table3.1presentsneighbourhoodswith25%orgreaterchangeinvisibledentaldecayratesacrosssurveyyears.Table3.2presentsschooldistrictswithconsistentdentaldecayratesacrosssurveyyears.
Figure 5.1. Map of British Columbia Depicting the Percentage of Kindergarten Students Identified as Having Visible Dental Decay in 2009/10 by School District.
page20
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
TheinteractivemapsoftheMappingPackagecontainseveralinterestingfindingsthatmightnototherwisebenoticedinthedatatables.Forinstance,someneighborhoodsappeartobeoutliersincomparisonwithadjacentneighbourhoodsintermsofdentalhealth.Examplesofthese“outliers”includethefollowing:
Table 3.1. Neighbourhoods With a 25% or Greater Change in % Visible Dental Decay Between Survey Years
HA Neighbourhood Name
% VisibleDental Decay (06/07)
% Visible Dental Decay (09/10)*
% Visible Dental Decay Change
SES Index (2006)
% Vulnerable on EDI (07/08 & 08/09)
FHA TsawwassenNorth 11.0 46.8 35.8 1.0 17.5FHA Abbotsford 67.7 41.9 -25.8 -1.3 38.1IHA Salmo 61.9 35.0 -26.9 0.2 32.7IHA Rossland/Warfield 47.2 20.0 -27.2 1.3 8.9IHA EastBoundary 52.0 24.3 -27.7 0.7 27.9IHA Enderby 50.0 22.2 -27.8 -0.2 25.6IHA SouthWest 67.7 32.3 -35.4 -0.4 28.0NHA NorthPeaceRural-East 28.6 55.6 27.0 1.2 41.5VCHA Norgate 45.5 20.0 -25.5 -0.7 30.6VCHA Hamilton 61.1 32.8 -28.3 0.4 22.6VIHA Gabriola 50.0 25.0 -25.0 0.0 NAVIHA OuterGulfIslands 20.0 53.3 33.3 0.6 NAVIHA ComoxWest 46.7 19.2 -27.5 0.5 NAVIHA SouthWellington-Cassidy 30.8 62.5 31.7 -0.8 NA
Table 3.2. School Districts with Consistent Visible Dental Decay Rates Across Survey Years
HA SD Neighbourhood Name% Visible Dental Decay (06/07)
% Code 01 (06/07)
% Visible Dental Decay (09/10)
% Code 01 (09/10)
IHA 19 Revelstoke-Central 47.1 52.9 42.3 57.7IHA 19 Revelstoke-Northwest 61.5 38.5 42.9 57.1IHA 19 Revelstoke-South 53.3 46.7 66.7 33.3IHA 58 Merritt 54.2 45.8 48.0 52.0IHA 58 Princeton 63.3 36.7 45.8 54.2IHA 74 GoldTrailWest 64.3 35.7 62.0 38.0IHA 74 GoldTrailEast NA NA 64.0 36.0NHA 52 PrinceRupert-Centre 52.5 47.5 60.6 39.4NHA 52 PrinceRupert-CowBay NA NA NA NA
NHA 52 PrinceRupert-South/Ferry 52.7 47.3 43.5 56.5
NHA 52 PrinceRupert-SealCove 68.4 31.6 53.9 46.2
NHA 52 NorthCoastalCommunities 50.0 50.0 71.4 28.6
VCHA 45 HorseshoeBay-Bow.Island 23.8 76.2 14.4 85.6
VCHA 45 Dundarave 24.3 75.7 15.8 84.2
VCHA 45 Ambleside-BritProperties 23.9 76.1 16.3 83.7
page21
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
• TsawwassenNorthwith46.8%visibledentaldecay,butadjacenttoTsawwassenSouthwith23.3%visibledentaldecayandDeltaRuralwith23.7%visibledentaldecay(seeFigure5.2).
Figure 5.2. Tsawwassen North (VCHA)
• SunValleywith62.1%visibledentaldecay,butsurroundedbycommunitiessuchasPittMeadowswith25.9%visibledentaldecay,LincolnParkwith31.3%,ImperialParkwith37.5%,Central/MaryHillwith30.8%,Citadelheightswith22.8%,CastleParkwith24.1%andImperialParkwith37.5%(seeFigure5.3).
Figure 5.3. Sun Valley (FHA)
• Rocklandwith51.6%visibledentaldecay,butadjacenttoQuinsam-Strathconawith31.0%visibledentaldecay,CampbellRiverSouthwith24.8%andShelterPointwith28.1%(seeFigure5.4).
Figure 5.4.Rockland (VIHA)
• DawsonCreekCentrewith28.6%visibledentaldecay,butadjacenttocommunitiesDawsonCreekSouthwith52.4%visibledentaldecay,SouthPeaceRuralwith51.6%andDawsonCreekNorthwith42.2%(seeFigure5.5).
Figure 5.5. Dawson Creek Centre (NHA)
page22
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Socioeconomic Influences of Early Childhood Oral Health in BCTheBCDentalProgramsEvaluationSubcommitteeprovidedinputontheselectionofvariablesfortheanalysisofsocioeconomicstatus(SES)anddentalhealthoutcomes.BasedontheSubcommittee’sfeedback,thefollowingsocioeconomicanddemographicvariablesfromthe2001/2006Censusand2004TaxFilerdatasetswereselectedforanalysis:
1. UnionorProfessionalMembership:Percentofpopulationpayingunionorprofessionaldues,withchildrenunderage6.
2. NotFluentinEnglish/French:PercentofpopulationthatdoesnotspeakeitherEnglishorFrenchfluently.
3. NoHighSchoolEducation:Percentofpopulationbetweentheageof25and64thatdoesnothaveahighschooldegree.
4. Low-Income:Percentofindividualslivinginhouseholdsbelowthelow-incomecutoff(LICO).Thisvariabledoesnotincludetheworkingpoororindividualswithlowerincomeslivingabovethesocialassistanceline.
5. Lone-ParentFamilies:Percentofcensusfamiliesheadedbyasingleparent.6. ResidentialMobility:Percentofpopulationthatmovedresidencesinthepastyear.
7. AboriginalPopulation:PercentofpopulationthatisAboriginal(self-identified).
Table4presentsdescriptivestatistics(samplesize,means,standarddeviations)fortheprovinceandhealthauthoritiesonthesevenvariablesselectedforanalysisbytheDentalEvaluationSubcommittee.Somekeyfindingsfromthetableareasfollows:
• UnionandprofessionalmembershipissimilaracrossHAs,withtheexceptionbeinginVCHAwhere32.6%oftaxfilerspayduescomparedtotheprovincialaverageof35.1%.
• VCHAalsohasthehighestratesofnon-fluencyinEnglishorFrench(4.3%)andpersonsbelowthelow-incomecutoff(16.5%vs.12.1%fortheprovince).
• Morethanoneinfiveadults(age25-64)residinginNHAhavenotcompletedhighschool(22.0%)and17.3%ofhouseholdsareledbyasingleparent.
Figure6belowpresentsprovincialandregionalvariationsrelatedtothesevenSubcommittee-chosenvariables.ItshouldbemadeclearthatofthesevenvariablespresentedinFigure6,onlyunionand/orprofessionalmembershipisconsidereda‘protective’factorintermsofSES;allothermeasuresarerelatedto‘risk’factors(i.e.,indicatorsoflowSES).
Table 4. Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Demographic Information for Province and HAs
Fraser Interior Northern Vancouver Coastal
Vancouver Island BC (Total)
Subcommittee SES Variables M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD M SDUnionorProfessionalMembership 35.5 7.8 34.6 8.8 36.4 10.1 32.6 8.1 36.1 8.8 35.1 8.6
NotFluentinEnglishorFrench 3.7 3.7 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 4.3 4.9 0.4 0.4 2.1 3.4
NoHighSchool 13.1 6.1 15 5.6 22 5.9 8.3 6.4 13.0 6.0 13.7 6.9Low-Income 14.1 6.8 9.3 3.8 9.7 5.6 16.5 8.4 9.6 5.1 12.1 6.7LoneParenthood 14.8 4.2 14 4.5 17.3 5.9 15.3 4.0 15.7 5.6 15.1 4.8Mobility 15.9 4.7 16.7 3.9 17.2 5.6 16.7 5.7 16.7 4.6 16.5 4.8AboriginalIdentity 2.9 2.8 6.5 6.8 20.4 17.9 3.5 8.6 7.0 6.9 6.4 9.5
Neigbourhoods 164 103 49 66 90 472
page23
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
HELPalsocreatedaSESindexalongwithseveralsubcomponents(e.g.,Wealth,Education,Unemployment,etc.)inrelationtoearlychilddevelopment.DatafortheHELPSESIndexwasderivedfromthe2006Censusand2004TaxFilerdatasets.Thenamesofthesecomponents,andtheindividualvariablesincludedineachofthem,canbefoundinAppendixE.TheappendixalsopresentsinformationonhowtheHELPSESindexwascreated.
Table5displaysvisibledentaldecayratesforfiveSESlevels,thenumberofstudentssurveyedwithinHELPSEScategoriesandthenumberofstudentswithdentaldecaybyeachsocioeconomicclassification.UsingHELP’sSESindex,wefoundthatdentaldecayratesremainedrelativelystableacrosssurveyyearsforalllevelsofSES;however,dentaldecayratesvariedgreatlydependingontheSESoftheneighbourhood:
• Approximately5in10childrenfromlowSESneighbourhoodsexperiencedentaldecay
• Atleastone-thirdofchildrenfrommoderate-levelSESneighbourhoods(whichreflectsthemajorityofBCneighbourhoods)experiencedentaldecay.
• Approximately3in10childrenfromhighSESneighbourhoodsexperiencedentaldecay.
HELPexaminedindividualcorrelationsbetweeneachofthesevenSESvariableschosenbytheDentalEvaluationSubcommitteeandearlychildhooddentalhealthoutcomes.Table6.1presentstheresultsofthecorrelationanalysis,whicharesummarizedasfollows:
Figure 6. SES and Demographic Measures for Province and Health Authorities
page24
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
• Inboth2006/07and2009/10,the%NoHighSchoolformsthestrongestrelationshipwith%VisibleDentalDecay.
• Unionandprofessionalmembershipistheonly“protective”factoramongthegroupofSESvariables.
• WithrespecttotheHELPSESIndexthestrongestrelationshipswiththe%VisibleDentalDecaywerewealthandunemployment.
Correlationswerealsocomputedbetweenthe%VisibleDentalDecayandtheHELPSESIndex,includingeachofitselevensubcomponents(seeAppendixE).Theresultsoftheanalysis,whicharesummarizedbelow,canbefoundinTable6.2.• TheoverallSESIndexwasabetterpredictorofdentalhealththananyindividualSEScomponent(e.g.,Wealth,Unemployment,etc.).
• TheWealthsubcomponentoftheSESIndexhadthestrongestcorrelationwiththe%VisibleDentalDecayin2006/07and2009/10.Thisleadsustospeculatethatasacommunity’swealthincreases,theirrateofdentaldecaywilldecline.
• Unemploymentwasanotherstrongcorrelateofdentaldecay,butinthiscaseasariskfactor.Astheunemploymentrateofcommunitiesrise,sodoestheirrateofdentaldecay.
Table 5. Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03) Rates by Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Status (based on overall HELP SES Index)HELP SES Index (2006)
% Visible Dental Decay in 2006/07
% Visible Dental Decay in 2009/10
HELP SES Index Categories
M SD Neigh-bourhoods
Students Surveyed*
Students w/
Decay*M SD Neigh-
bouhoodsStudents
Surveyed*
Students w/
Decay*
LowSES 49.6 11.1 89 7,661 3,800 48.3 12.4 94 7,552 3,648
ModeratelyLowSES 41.7 10.3 88 6,495 2,708 39.9 10.6 91 6,603 2,635
ModerateSES 37.8 10.5 86 6,548 2,475 35.6 10.1 94 6,915 2,462
ModeratelyHighSES 33.9 8.4 88 6,600 2,237 33.4 10.1 93 6,713 2,242
HighSES 30.9 8.8 87 6,422 1,984 29.9 9.9 93 6,804 2,034
TOTAL 38.8 11.8 438 33,726 13,086 37.4 12.4 465 34,587 12,936
Notes:LowSES=bottom20thpercentileofneighbourhoodsinBC(intermsofSES)…HighSES=top20thpercentileofneighbourhoodsinBC.M=Mean(Average);SD=StandardDeviation;Neighborhoods=numberofHELPneighborhoodsassignedtoSEScategory.*Thenumberofkindergartenstudentssurveyedandwithdecayisanunderestimateduetosuppression.
Table 6.1. Correlations between Subcommittee SES/Demographic Measures and % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
Correlations (r)Visible Dental Decay 06/07 (n = 438)
Visible Dental Decay 09/10 (n = 464)
SubcommitteeSESvariables:
Union/Prof.Membership -.397 -.448
NotFluentinEnglish/French .330 .304
NoHighSchool .546 .577
Low-Income .437 .356
LoneParentFamilies .363 .364
ResidentialMobility .228 .166
AboriginalIdentity .337 .432
Note:Allcorrelationcoefficientsinthetablearesignificantatp<.01.
page25
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
TofurtherillustratetherelationshipbetweenSESanddentaldecayacrosssurveyyears,Figure7presentsascatterplotshowingthegeneralpatternoftherelationshipbetweenHELP’sSESIndex(2006)andpercentdentaldecaybykindergartendentalsurveyyear.• Inbothsurveyyears,asthesocioeconomicstatusofcommunitiesincreases(movingfromlefttorightontheX-axis),thepercentdentaldecaysteadilydeclines.
• ThestrengthoftherelationshipbetweenSESandvisibledentaldecayissimilaracrossbothsurveyyears;70–75%
Figure 7. Visible Dental Decay Rates by HELP SES Percentile
Table 6.2. Correlations between HELP SES Index and Subcomponents and % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
Correlations (r)
Visible Dental Decay 06/07 (n = 438)
Visible Dental Decay 09/10 (n = 464)
HELPSESIndex(2006) -.565 -.538
Wealth -.541 -.551
Unemployment .500 .512
ResidentialStability -.272 -.210
Poverty .290 .278
LoneParents .433 .455
HousingDensity .152 .103
LanguageandImmigration .234 .185
WomeninManufacturing -.413 -.360
Education -.383 -.429
SocialAssistance -.446 -.394MedianGov’tTransfers -.474 -.471
Note:Allcorrelationcoefficientsinthetablearesignificantatp<.01.
page26
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
ofthevarianceinpredictingvisibledentaldecayratesacrosssurveyyearsisunexplainedbySES.Thismeansthatthereareothercommunity-levelfactorsthatinfluencevisibledentaldecayrates,whicharenotincludedinouranalysis.
HELPextendedthecorrelationalanalysisbyconductingaseriesofMultipleRegressionAnalyses,whichprovidetheaddedbenefitofexaminingtherelationshipbetweenvisibledentaldecayandseveralindicatorsofSESsimultaneously.ThisallowsforafullerpicturetobegleanedabouttherelationshipbetweenSESanddentaldecaybecausesevendifferentindicatorsofSES,aschosenbytheDentalEvaluationSubcommittee,wereincludedinthesameanalysis.
TheresultsoftheanalysesusingthesevenSubcommittee-chosenSESvariablesarepresentedinTable7.1.AppendixDpresentsinformationonhowtointerprettheresultsoftheRegressionAnalysis;someofthekeyfindingsarepresentedbelow:
• Accordingtotheanalyses,thepercentofadults(age25-64)inthecommunitywith“NoHighSchool”(i.e.,the%adultswhodidnotcompletehighschool)istheriskfactorthatbestpredictsyoungchildren’soralhealth,explaininghalfofthevarianceinvisibledentaldecayratesin2006/07andtwo-fifthsofthevariancein2009/10.
• Low-incomeisthesecondstrongestriskfactorintermsofthe%VisibleDentalDecayin2006/07,butthisrelationshipissomewhatweakenedin2009/10.
• UnionorprofessionalmembershipandNon-FluencyinEnglishorFrencharenotstrongpredictorsofearlychildhooddentaldecayin2006/07,buttheyarein2009/10.
• Loneparenthoodandresidentialmobilityarealsonotstrongpredictorsoforalhealthoutcomesofyoungchildren.
Table 7.1. Regression Analysis for SES (Subcommittee) and % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
Dependent Variables
Subcommittee SES/ Demographic Variables
Visible Dental Decay 06/07
VisibleDental Decay 09/10
Union/Prof.Membershipb=-.029 b=-.189*s.e.=.065 s.e.=.063
1.888 12.554
NotFluentinEnglish/French
b=.240 b=.722**s.e.=.196 s.e.=.190
5.304 12.876
NoHighSchoolb=.704** b=.582**s.e.=.092 s.e.=.086
50.430 40.103
Low-Incomeb=.578** b=.251*s.e.=.120 s.e.=.118
32.705 10.288
LoneParentFamiliesb=-.051 b=.082s.e.=.131 s.e.=.130
-1.672 2.470
ResidentialMobilityb=.069 b=-.076
s.e.=.105 s.e.=.1061.452 -1.043
AboriginalIdentityb=.178* b=.320**s.e.=.074 s.e.=.065
9.860 22.818
(Constant)b=21.468** b=29.511**s.e.=3.766 s.e.=3.639
N(neighbourhoods) 438 464
F 47.904** 57.367**
R2 .438 .468
Std. Error of the Estimate 8.932 9.095
**p<.01;*p<.05;Dp<.10.ValuesinboldareImportanceScores.
page27
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
• CommunitieswithlargernumbersofAboriginalpeoplestendtohavehigherratesofearlychildhoodcaries.
Table 7.2. Regression Analysis for SES (HELP) and % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03) Dependent Variables
HELP SES Index and Scales Visible Dental Decay 06/07 Visible Dental Decay 09/10
HELPSESIndex(2006)b=-6.685** b=-6.665** s.e.=.467 s.e.=.486 100.000 100.000
Wealth(MainModel) b=-4.621** b=-4.711** s.e.=.667 s.e.=.682
48.330 47.500
Education(excludeWealth) b=-4.968** b=-5.875**
s.e.=.717 s.e.=.714
37.504 44.961
SocialAssistance(excludeWealth)
b=-3.779** b=-2.268**
s.e.=.785 s.e.=.768
34.171 18.690
MedianGov’tTransfers(excludeWealth)
b=-4.486** b=-4.038** s.e.=.767 s.e.=.749
41.088 36.432
Unemployment b=3.110** b=3.088** s.e.=.655 s.e.=.624
26.330 27.714
ResidentialStability b=-.581 b=-1.780** s.e.=.559 s.e.=.571
-2.956 -6.663
Poverty b=.116 b=.164 s.e.=.507 s.e.=.516
0.671 -0.829
LoneParents b=.821 b=1.928** s.e.=.692 s.e.=.687
6.554 16.175
LanguageandImmigration b=3.181** b=3.776**
s.e.=.634 s.e.=.652
14.180 12.450
WomeninManufacturing b=-.797 b=-.526
s.e.=.538 s.e.=.544
6.724 3.643
(Constant)b=39.694** b=29.511** b=38.267** b=39.932**
s.e.=.470 s.e.=3.639 s.e.=.488 s.e.=.624
N(neighbourhoods) 439 439 465 465
F 204.657** 47.130** 188.175** 50.520**
R2 .319 .434 .289 .436
Std. Error of the estimate 9.764 8.967 10.439 9.356
**p<.01;*p<.05;Dp<.10.NumbersinboldareImportanceScores.
page28
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
WithregardtotheHELPSESindexandsubcomponents,severalregressionanalyseswereruntopredictthe%VisibleDentalDecayin2006/07andin2009/10.Table7.2presentstheresultsoftheseanalyses(seeAppendixDforinformationoninterpretingregressionanalyses).Thekeyfindingsareasfollows:
• Aswasfoundinthecorrelationalanalysis,“Wealth”wasthesocioeconomicprotectivefactorthatmoststronglypredictedtheoralhealthoutcomesofyoungchildren,explainingnearlyhalfofthevarianceinvisibledentaldecayratesacrossbothsurveyyears.
• EducationandMedianGovernmentTransferswerealsostrongprotectivefactorsinpredictingthe%VisibleDentalDecay,butthesesubcomponentsoftheHELPSESIndexwerehighlyrelatedtoWealth(seeAppendixDforexplanation).Inotherwords,these3factorshaveanoverlappinginfluenceontheoralhealthofcommunities.
• Unemploymentwasthesolesocioeconomicriskfactorthatconsistentlypredicteddentaldecayratesinboth2006/07and2009/10.
Tables8.1and8.2presentImportanceScoresalongwiththepatternoftherelationshipforeachSESvariable(Subcommittee-chosenandHELPSESIndexwithsubcomponents)andtherateofvisibledentaldecay.
• HigherImportanceScores(positivevalues)representstrongerrelationshipswiththe%VisibleDentalDecayrelativetootherSESvariables.
• ImportancescoresfortheSESindexinthesemodels=100%,becauseitisthesolevariablepredictingdentaldecayinthemodels(seefirstoftwocolumnsundereachanalysisofthe%VisibleDentalDecayin2006/07and2009/10).
• Inbothsurveyyears,aone-unitincreaseintheHELPSESIndexcorrespondstonearlya7-percentreductionintherateofvisibledentaldecay.Aone-unitincreaseintheSESIndexroughlycorrespondstoapercentileincreasefrom50th(provincialaverage)tothe79thpercentile.
Table 8.1. Subcommittee SES/Demographic Importance Scores in Predicting the % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
% Visible Dental Decay in 2006/07
% Visible Dental Decay in 2009/10
Importance Score
Pattern of Relationship
Importance Score
Pattern of Relationship
Subcommittee SES variables
Union/Prof.Membership 1.9 Decay 12.5* Decay
NotFluentinEnglish/French 5.3 Decay 12.9** Decay
NoHighSchool 50.4** Decay 40.1** Decay
Low-Income 32.7** Decay 10.3* Decay
LoneParentFamilies -1.7 Decay+ 2.5 Decay
ResidentialMobility 1.5 Decay -1.0 Decay+
AboriginalIdentity 9.9* Decay 22.8** Decay
Note:ImportanceScoresmaynotaddupto100duetoroundingerror.*p<.05;**p<.01.+Counterintuitivefinding:therelationshipwith%VisibleDentalDecayformedtheoppositerelationshipfromwhatwasexpected(hencethenegativeimportancescore).
page29
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
On- and Off-DiagonalsAnexploratoryanalysiswasconductedtoidentify‘on’and‘off’diagonalneighbourhoods.On-diagonalneighbourhoodsareneighbourhoodsthathaveexpectedoutcomesintermsofSESanddentalhealth.
Moreformally,on-diagonalscanbedefinedas:
• HighSESneighbourhoodswithlowratesofvisibledentaldecayinboth2006/07and2009/10;or
• LowSESneighbourhoodswithhighratesofvisibledentaldecayinbothsurveyyears.
Off-diagonalsareneighbourhoodsthathaveeitherworsethanexpectedorbetterthanexpecteddentaloutcomeswithregardtotheirsocioeconomicstatus.Off-diagonalscanbedefinedas:
• HighSESneighbourhoodswithhighratesofvisibledentaldecayinboth2006/07and2009/10;or
• LowSESneighbourhoodswithlowratesofvisibledentaldecayinbothsurveyyears.
Table9presentsthenumberandpercentofonandoff-diagonalneighbourhoodsidentifiedacrosssurveyyears.Somekeyfindingsareasfollows:
• 277neighbourhoods(outof444neighbourhoods)wereidentifiedason-diagonalsin2006/07andagainin2009/10.Theseneighbourhoodshadratesofvisibledentaldecaythatwereasexpectedbasedontheirsocioeconomicstatus(i.e.,highervisibledentaldecayrateswereassociatedwithlowersocioeconomicstandings).Forinformationonhowon-diagonal
Table 8.2. HELP SES Index and Component Importance Scores in Predicting the % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
% Visible Dental Decay in 2006/07
% Visible Dental Decay in 2009/10
Importance Score
Pattern of Relationship
Importance Score
Pattern of Relationship
HELP SES Index 100.0** Decay 100.0** Decay
Wealth(MainModel) 48.3** Decay 47.5** Decay
Unemployment 26.3** Decay 27.7** Decay
ResidentialStability -3.0 Decay+ -6.7** Decay+
Poverty 0.7 Decay -0.8 Decay+
LoneParents 6.6 Decay 16.2** Decay
LanguageandImmigration 14.2** Decay 12.5** Decay
WomeninManufacturing 6.7 Decay 3.6 Decay
Note:ImportanceScoresmaynotaddupto100duetoroundingerror.ImportanceScoresforEducation,SocialAssistanceandMedianGovernmentTransfersarenotincludedinthemainmodelduetocollinearity.(i.e.,theanalysisincludingEducationexcludesWealth,SocialAssistance,andMedianGovernmentTransfersfromthemodel).*p<.05;**p<.01.+Counterintuitivefinding:therelationshipwith%VisibleDentalDecayformedtheoppositerelationshipfromwhatwasexpected(hencethenegativeimportancescore).
page30
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
scoresarecalculated,pleaseseeForer(2007).
• Intotal,100off-diagonalswereidentifiedeitherin2006/07andin2009/10,50betterthanexpectedand50worsethanexpected.Alistoftheseneighbourhoodsbysurveyyearisprovidedintheexcelspreadsheetattachment.Forinformationonhowoff-diagonalscoresarecalculated,pleaseseeForer(2007).
• Inordertobeconsideredaconsistentoff-diagonal,theneighbourhoodmustbeanoff-diagonalinbothKindergartenDentalSurveyyears.Intotal,30neighbourhoodswereidentifiedasconsistentoff-diagonals:14betterthanexpected(e.g.,FairviewinVancouver)and16worsethanexpected(e.g.,Rosedale/ChilliwackEastinFraserEast).
Table 9. Summary of Neighbourhood On/Off-Diagonals (SESDental)#
NeighbourhoodsValid % of
Neighborhoods
PersistentOn-Diagonal 277 62.4%
Off-Diagonalin06/07only 67 15.1%
Off-Diagonalin09/10only 67 15.1%Off-Diagonalin06/07&09/10 33 7.4%
PersistentOff-Diagonalsin06/07&09/10 30 6.8%
Table 10. Neighbourhood Off-Diagonals (SESDental)
Surveyed Dental Decay CHANGE SES
Health Region Neighbourhood 06-07 09-10 06-07 09-10 06/07-09/10 Percentile
Bette
r Tha
n Ex
pect
ed
FraserN. Metrotown 98 104 36.7 41.4 4.6 0Okanagan KLO/Casorso 70 81 21.4 21.0 -0.4 42Okanagan CentralWest 26 15 34.6 26.7 -8.0 15Okanagan NortheastRutland 52 49 32.7 22.5 -10.2 21NorthShore Delbrook 80 102 17.5 15.7 -1.8 93NorthShore MosquitoCreek 97 92 27.8 19.6 -8.3 36NorthShore Blueridge 58 69 13.8 13.0 -0.8 67NorthShore Dundarave 103 95 24.3 15.8 -8.5 52
NorthShore Ambleside-BritProperties 251 221 23.9 16.3 -7.6 44
Vancouver UniversityLands 74 93 39.2 31.2 -8.0 6Vancouver Fairview 121 122 26.5 16.4 -10.1 31N.Van.Island Glacierview/Vanier 42 78 26.2 23.1 -3.1 44S.Van.Island Fairfield 144 154 18.8 22.1 3.3 58S.Van.Island JamesBay 54 33 24.1 27.3 3.2 20
Wor
se T
han
Expe
cted
FraserE. Rosedale/ChilliwackEast 110 138 45.5 45.7 0.2 89
FraserN. DeerLake 22 29 63.6 55.2 -8.5 33FraserS. Bridgeview 15 17 60.0 70.6 10.6 26TCS Revelstoke-South 15 12 53.3 66.7 13.3 96
TCS WilliamsLake-Downtown 58 83 63.8 65.1 1.3 13
TCS Dallas/MonteCreek 89 101 52.8 49.5 -3.3 76TCS GoldTrailWest 42 50 64.3 62.0 -2.3 72TCS Shuswap 40 26 52.5 46.2 -6.4 71E.Kootenay Creston 60 105 51.7 50.5 -1.2 48KootenayB. Robson/Thrums 26 11 50.0 45.5 -4.6 75Northeast SouthPeaceRural 26 31 61.5 51.6 -9.9 92Northeast DawsonCreekSouth 49 42 49.0 52.4 3.4 50Northwest Hazeltons 50 80 74.0 73.8 -0.3 1C.Van.Island SouthNanaimo 78 71 59.0 60.6 1.6 9C.Van.Island CobbleHill 31 23 41.9 56.5 14.6 92
N.Van.Island CampbellRiver-Centre 21 27 66.7 63.0 -3.7 13
page31
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Table10presentsdataonthe30identifiedoff-diagonalneighbourhoods.Thecorrespondingneighbourhood-levelmapsforhealthauthoritiesalsoidentifytheseneighbourhoods.Off-diagonalsserveasagoodstartingpointtoidentifyuniquecaseswheredentalprogramsareworkingand,alternatively,wheremoreresourcesmaybeneededthroughouttheprovince.
Visible Dental Decay Rates and Early Child Development Indicators Inthissection,wepresenttheanalysisofkindergartenvisibledentaldecayratesandearlychilddevelopmentoutcomesinBC,asmeasuredbytheEarlyDevelopmentInstrument(EDI).Theapproachtoanalyzeearlychildhooddentalhealthdatawithrespecttoearlychilddevelopmentoutcomesisreflectiveofaholisticviewthatoralhealthisnotmutuallyexclusivefromachild’soverallhealthanddevelopmentmoregenerally.Forexample,itisanticipatedthatpopulationsconsideredathighriskintermsoftheirgeneralhealthandwell-beingmaydisproportionatelyexperiencenotonlyhigherratesofvisibledentaldecaybutalsohigherratesofdevelopmentalvulnerability.Analysisofpopulation-levelearlychilddevelopmentdatawithkindergartenvisibledentaldecaydatacouldyieldnewinformationabouttheextentthattherearecommonriskfactors,suchasthesocioeconomicstatusanddemographicsofaneighbourhood,thatmaydifferentiallyinfluenceyoungchildren’soralhealthandoveralldevelopmentovertimeandacrossgeographicareas.
TheEDIisusedinBCtounderstandthevulnerabilityofthepopulationofyoungchildren.Measuringchildren’sdevelopmentatschoolentryisimportantbecauseitreflectsthequalityofchildren’searlyexperiences.TheEDIisaholisticmeasureofchildren’sdevelopmentandprovidesmeasurementonthesefivedistinctscales:
1. Physicalhealthandwell-being2. Socialcompetence3. Emotionalmaturity4. Languageandcognitivedevelopment5. Communicationskillsandgeneralknowledge
KindergartenteacherscompleteanEDIchecklistforeachchildintheirclassaftertheyhaveknowntheirstudentsforseveralmonths.Allteachersundergostandardizedtrainingintheadministrationoftheinstrument.FormorediscussionoftheEDI,pleaseseeAppendixD.Table 11. EDI (Wave 3) Vulnerability Rates (%) for Province and HAs
EDI Wave 3 (2007-09) Fraser Interior Northern Vancouver Coastal
Vancouver Island BC (Total)
% Vulnerable by Scale M SD M SD M SD M SD M SD M SDPhysicalHealth&Well-being 11.0 6.7 10.2 6.8 15.9 9.0 11.3 7.6 10.9 6.5 11.4 7.2
SocialCompetence 12.4 6.9 9.9 6.0 14.7 9.9 13.4 6.2 12.3 7.7 12.2 7.3EmotionalMaturity 11.3 6.3 11.5 7.3 12.8 6.0 13.0 6.2 11.7 7.2 11.8 6.7
Language&CognitiveDevelopment 9.9 6.2 8.6 6.0 15.0 8.7 9.0 6.3 9.8 5.5 10.0 6.6
CommunicationSkills&GeneralKnowledge 13.3 7.0 10.0 6.5 14.0 9.4 14.1 8.6 10.9 5.9 12.3 7.4
OneorMoreScales 27.8 11.1 24.6 10.9 33.3 13.1 29.4 11.3 26.3 10.0 27.6 11.4
Note:M=mean;SD=standarddeviation.
page32
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Table11presentsdescriptivestatistics(samplesize,means,standarddeviations)fortheprovinceandfivehealthauthoritiesforeachofthefiveEDIsubscales,includingtheoverallmeasureofvulnerability(vulnerableononeormorescales).ThedataarefromWave3oftheEDI,whichwasadministeredinthe2007/08and2008/09schoolyears.
AsaninitialtestoftherelationshipbetweenEDIandtheoralhealthofyoungchildren,correlationswerecomputedbetweenthe%VisibleDentalDecayin2006/07andsixindicatorsofearlychilddevelopment(asmeasuredbyWave3oftheEDI).TheresultsofthecorrelationanalysisarepresentedinTable12.
MultipleRegressionAnalyseswerealsoconductedinwhichthe%VisibleDentalDecayandtheHELPSESIndexwerejointlyusedtopredicteachmeasureofEDIinWave3(e.g.,%childrenvulnerableintermsofphysicalhealthandwell-being).TheresultsoftheseanalysesarepresentedinTable13andsummarizedbelow:
• Theoralhealthofyoungchildren,asmeasuredbythe%ofkindergartenchildrenwithvisibledentaldecay,isasignificantpredictorofearlychild
Table 12. Correlations between EDI Vulnerability Rates (Wave 3) and % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03)
Correlations (Pearson’s r) Visible dental Decay 06/07 (n = 439)
EDIVulnerability(Wave3): .398
PhysicalHealth&Well-being .335
SocialCompetence .280
EmotionalMaturity .222
Language&CognitiveDevelopment .366
CommunicationSkills&GeneralKnowledge .376
Note:Allcorrelationcoefficientsinthetablearesignificantatp<.01.
Table 13. Regression Analysis for % Visible Dental Decay (Code 02 + 03) and EDI Vulnerability Rates (Wave 3) Dependent Variables: % Vulnerable on EDI (Wave 3)
Independent Variables Physical Social Emotional Language Commun-
ication One or More Scales
VisibleDentalDecay06/07
b=.066* b=.027 b=.017 b=.083** b=.031 b=.092*
s.e.=.030 s.e.=.032 s.e.=.030 s.e.=.028 s.e.=.029 s.e.=.044
17.203 6.185 5.262 24.287 4.950 10.966
HELPSESIndex(2006)
b=-2.735** b=-5.457** b=-2.251** b=-2.415** b=-4.327** b=-6.003**
s.e.=.356 s.e.=.549 s.e.=.360 s.e.=.326 s.e.=.343 s.e.=.527
82.797 93.815 94.738 75.713 95.050 89.034
(Constant)b=8.786** b=
11.395**b=
11.314** b=6.807** b=11.702**
b=24.447**
s.e.=1.229 s.e.=1.309 s.e.=1.242 s.e.=1.127 s.e.=1.186 s.e.=1.819
N(neighbour-hoods)
439 439 439 439 439 439
F 60.796** 53.897** 31.904** 65.326** 128.445** 118.147**
R2 .218 .198 .128 .231 .371 .351
Std. Error of the Estimate
6.135 6.535 6.201 5.626 5.921 9.082
**p<.01;*p<.05;Dp<.10.NumbersinboldareImportanceScores.
page33
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
developmentintermsof(1)physicalhealthandwell-being,(2)languageandcognitivedevelopment,and(3)overalldevelopmentalvulnerability(i.e.,vulnerabilityononeormorescalesoftheEDI).
• TheserelationshipswerefoundaftercontrollingfortheeffectsofSES.Relativetothesocioeconomicstatusofthechild’scommunity,however,theoralhealthofyoungchildrenisarelativelyweakpredictorofearlychilddevelopment.
SummaryOverall,thesefindingssuggest:
• Dentaloutcomesofchildrendifferbygeographiclocationandsocioeconomicstatusoftheneighbourhood.
• Althoughthepercentagechangeinvisibledentaldecayratesataprovinciallevelbetween2006/07and2009/10wassmall,ratesofchangedifferedgreatlydependingupontheneighbourhood.
• Childrenfromsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoodstendtohavehigherratesofvisibledentaldecaythanthoseinmoreadvantagedneighbourhoods.Theproportionofchildrenaffectedishighestinthelowestsocioeconomicstatusneighbourhoods(i.e.,1forevery2childrenhasvisibledentaldecay);however,intermsofnumbersofchildrenwithvisibledentaldecay,themajorityofchildrenwithvisibledentaldecayresideinneighbourhoodswithmid-levelcategoriesofsocioeconomicstatus.
• Thereisamoderatelevelofconsistencybetweenratesofvulnerability,asmeasuredbytheEDI,andratesofvisibledentaldecay,atleastforthe2006/07dentalsurveydataset.
• Visibledentaldecaydoesnotappeartomakeastrong,uniquecontributionoverandabovesocioeconomicfactorsinpredictingratesofearlychildhoodvulnerability.
page34
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
RISK ASSESSMENT
2. Are the current dental health risk assessment/screen guidelines implemented as intended?
Withinfocusgroupdiscussions,dentalstaffconsistentlyreportedthattheywerefamiliarwithregion-specificprotocolsandguidelinesfordentalhealthriskassessments.Ingeneral,staffineachHealthAuthoritystatedthatdentalhealthriskassessmentguidelineswerebeingimplementedasintendedandthatthetoolsweresimpletouseaspartoftheestablished,routineprocedures.Thereweresomevariationsamongdentalhealthriskassessmentimplementationprotocolsandguidelines,suchaswhichassessmenttoolsareused,aswellastheproceduresforaskingparentsquestions,identifyingandclassifyingrisklevels,andfollowing-upwithfamilies.
2i. What standardized dental health risk assessment tool/questions should be used with children aged 0-5 (including kindergarten entry) in BC?In2007/2008HELPundertookaCariesRiskAssessment44ToolDevelopmentproject,whichincludedareviewoftheliteratureandbest-practiceswithinandoutsideBC,consultationswithpublichealthdentalstaff,andrecommendationsfromtheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramsEvaluationSubcommittee.Asaresultofthisprocess,HELPwasabletodistillfivekeythemesthatcutacrosstheliteratureaswellasthedifferenttoolsandguidelinesusedinhealthauthorities:dentistvisits,signsofdecay,toothbrushingandfluoride,feedingpractices,barrierstoaccess(seeAppendixFformoredetails).Thesethemesweredrawnupontoproposeseveralriskassessmentquestionsthatcouldbeconsideredwithanyfuturedevelopmentofthetool(Forfurtherinformationaboutthesequestions,pleaseseetheProvincialCariesRiskAssessment(CRA)ToolDevelopmentandValidationTemplate).
Inconsideringanyrevisionstotheassessmenttool,itmaybeusefultonotethatinaScottishstudyof1500one-year-olds,thetwomostsignificantriskindicatorsforthechildhavingatleastthreecariousteethattheageoffourwere(1)livinginsocialhousing,and(2)thehealthvisitor’ssubjectiveopinionon“Isthischildathighrisk
44Inthisevaluationproject,dental health risk assessmentreferstocaries risk assessmentaswellasthedentalhealthassessmentportionofanearlychildhoodhealthassessment.Caries risk assessment(CRA)referstothedeterminationofthelikelihoodoftheincidenceofcaries.InBChealthauthorities,dentalstaffplayacentralroleincariesriskassessment,whilePublicHealthNursesprovideearlychildhoodhealthassessmentsandreferralstodentalstaff.
Perhaps we should look at adding additional questions regarding…accessibility issues and other factors that influence caries risk?”
Focus Group Participant, NHA
Avarietyoftools,guidelines,andfollowuptechniquesarecurrentlybeingusedacrosshealthauthorities.
Additionally,dentalstaffconsistentlyreportedthatriskassessments/screeningguidelineswerebeingimplementedasintended,andweresimpletouse.K
EY F
IND
ING
page35
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
oforfromcaries”(yes/no)(sensitivity=65%,specificity=69%).45IntheScottishNationalClinicGuidelineforthePreventionandManagementofToothDecayinthePreschoolChild,itisstatedthatcariesriskassessmentwouldbeappropriateforusebybothdentalandnon-dentalpersonal,andwouldbeappropriateinaprimarycaresetting.46Extrapolatingfromtheavailableevidence,theguidelinerecommendsthat“specialistcommunitypublichealthnursesandchildhealthcareprofessionalscouldconsidercarryingoutacariesriskassessmentofchildrenintheirfirstyearasapartofthechild’soverallhealthassessment.”
2ii. At what age(s) should these be administered?Atthetimeofevaluation,healthauthoritieswerescreeningchildrenatdiverseages.Insomehealthauthoritiesaquestionnairewasadministeredat12-month-oldChildHealthClinics(CHCs).Othershealthauthoritiesoffertheriskassessmentincommunitysettingsandatthehealthunitforchildren0-4yearsold.FraserHealthAuthorityalsoofferedintegratedscreeningprogramsfor18-month-oldchildrenincareaswellas3-year-oldchildrenatselectedcommunitysites.VancouverIslandHealthAuthorityintegrateddentalhealth-relatedquestionsintothehealthassessmentbyPublicHealthNurses(PHNs)ateachCHC,fromthe2-monththroughthe24-monthvisit.
Inthefocusgroups,opinionsontheidealageatwhichriskassessmentsshouldbeadministeredrangedfrom6months-oldto18months-old.Generally,itwasbelievedthatassessmentatanearlierageprovidesmoretimelypreventiveinterventions.Itprovidesopportunitiesforpublichealthstafftoworkwiththecaregiversorparentsandalsoenablesthechildtobecomefamiliarwithoralhealthexaminations.Theliteraturerecommendsthatcariesriskassessmentsbeadministerednolaterthan12months-old,47, 48withthecaveatthatthefieldofcariesriskassessmentisrelativelynew,49andthattherearemultiplepopulationfactorstoconsiderinprogramplanning(includingsocioeconomicstatus,languagediversity,etc).50
2iii. Who should administer the dental health risk assessment?Avarietyofhealthauthoritystaffadministereddentalhealthriskassessmentsatthetimeofevaluation.Insomehealthauthorities,healthunitvolunteers,clerksorPHNshandedoutapaper-basedquestionnairetoparents.Inotherhealthauthorities,healthunitswithdentalstaffin-house(andusuallyservingsmallerpopulations),aface-to-facedialoguewithparentsmayhavetakenplace.
Aspartofthe2007/08CRAToolDevelopmentprocess,membersoftheDentalEvaluationSubcommitteerecommendedthatifwrittensimply,thestandardizedCRAcouldbeusedbypublichealthdentalpersonnel,includingCertifiedDental
45HeatherBallantyne-MacRitchie,“ApartnershipbetweenhealthvisitorsanddentiststoidentifyhighcariesriskScottishpre-schoolchildren”(PhDThesis,UniversityofDundee,2000).46ScottishIntercollegiateGuidelinesNetwork,Prevention and management of dental decay in the pre-school child: A national clinical guideline(Edinburgh:NationalHealthServicesQualityImprovementScotland,2005).47F.Ramos-Gomez,S.Gansky,andJ.Featherstone,“CariesRiskAssessmentAppropriatefortheAge1Visit(InfantsandToddlers),”Canadian Dental Association Journal35,no.10(2007):687-702.48AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistryCouncilonClinicalAffairs,“Policyonuseofacaries-riskassessmenttool(CAT)forinfants,children,andadolescents.”49RocioQuiñonezetal.,“Chapter8:Caries-riskassessment,”inEarly childhood oral health(Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009),170-197.50AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,Research Brief: Fluoride Varnish: an Evidence-Based Approach(Sparks,NV:AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,2007).
page36
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Assistants,DentalHygienists,andnon-dentalpublichealthstaff.Itwassuggestedthatwherefeasible,dentalstaffwouldadministerriskassessmentssincetheycouldimmediatelyprovidefollow-up.Ifnodentalstaffwereavailable,non-dentalpublichealthstaff(e.g.,clericalstafforvolunteers)couldadministerthequestionnaireandsubmitthecompletedformstodentalstaffforfollow-up.
2iv. What guidelines and follow-up procedures should be used?AvarietyofguidelineswerebeingusedacrossBCatthetimeoftheevaluation:aclassificationgrid,counselingnotes,healthauthority-specificprotocols,PHNpracticeguidelines.Avarietyoffollowuppracticeswerealsoused,includingon-sitefluoridevarnish,distributionofpamphlets,mailingtoothpaste,andphoningfamiliestoofferfluoridevarnish.InVIHA,familieswerereferredtodentalstaffforcariesriskassessmentifdentalriskfactorsorconcernswereidentifiedduringtheHealthCheckorPHNscreening.Althoughnotbrushingtwicedailyisconsidered“highrisk”insomeareasand“mediumrisk”inothers,thisriskfactorconsistentlydeterminedreferraltothefluoridevarnishprogramacrossallfivehealthauthorities.Ultimately,allguidelinesandfollowupproceduresincludedcontactbymailorphonewithanofferoffluoridevarnishforchildrenassessedashighrisk(and/orrecommendationtoseeadentistfortreatmentasneeded).
Withregardstotheformatofguidelinesandprocedurestobeused,HELPrecommendsthattheMinistryofHealthconsiderdevelopingstandardizedguidelinesandfollowupprocedures(seeRecommendationssectionforfurtherdetails).Aspartofthe2007/08CRAToolDevelopmentprocess,HELPdevelopedaquestionnairetogatherhealthauthoritystaffperspectivesonwhatguidelinesandfollow-upproceduresshouldbeused(e.g.,contentandtypesofguidelines,documentation,preventivestrategiesbyrisklevel,mandatoryversussuggestedfollow-up).Theadministrationofthequestionnairewasdiscontinuedinordertofocustheevaluationontheimplementationoftheexistingdentalhealthriskassessmentprograms.
Contentareasforconsiderationthatstemfromfocusgroupdiscussionsandtheliteratureinclude:
1. FluorideVarnish• Anyprotocolontheapplicationoffluoridevarnishshouldbebasedonriskassessment.51
• Forpredominatelyhigh-riskpopulations(e.g.,peoplewithlowsocio-economicstatus,newimmigrantsandrefugees,allFirstNationsandInuitchildren),fluoridevarnishshouldbeappliedtwiceayear,unlesstheindividualhasnoriskofcaries,asindicatedbypastandcurrentcarieshistory.52
• Giventhatthereisgoodevidenceofthecomplementaryeffectivenessofsealantsandvarnish,aswellastoothbrushingandnutritionalcounseling,oralhealthcareprogramsshouldincludeasmanycomplementarypreventivestrategiesasfeasible.(seealso:Crall,200753).54
• Populationfactorstoconsiderinfluoridevarnishprogramplanninginclude
51A.AzarpazhoohandP.A.Main,“Fluoridevarnishinthepreventionofdentalcariesinchildrenandadolescents:asystematicreview,”Journal (Canadian Dental Association)74,no.1(2008):73-79.52Ibid.53JamesJCrall,“Rethinkingprevention,”Pediatric Dentistry28,no.2(2006):96-101;discussion192-198.54AzarpazhoohandMain,“Fluoridevarnishinthepreventionofdentalcariesinchildrenandadolescents.”
page37
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
availabilityofdentalcareandproportionofthepopulationwho1)arelowSES,2)areanethnicminority,3)speakEnglishasasecondlanguage,4)arehomeless,5)havelimitededucation,6)havespecialhealthcareneeds,7)havehighcariesincidenceandprevalenceratesoradvanceddisease,and8)lackaccesstofluoridatedwater.55
2. Supportingfamiliesinaccessingtreatmentservices56
• Recommendvisitstodentists.• Maintainlistsofdentistsandaccessibilityinformation(e.g.,acceptingnewpatients,wheelchairaccessible,acceptsFirstNationsNon-InsuredHealthBenefits,acceptsHealthyKidsBenefits).
• Informfamiliesthatdentalofficesmayrequirepaymentattimeofserviceandsuggestthattheyaskinadvanceofdentistvisitswhetherornotpaymentisrequired,therebyhelpingthefamilytobeawareofanychallengestheymayencounteratthedentaloffice.
3. Modesoffollow-upcontact• Considermorepersonalizedfollow-upprocedures.Focusgroupfindingssuggestthatthatfollow-upphonecallsmaybemoreeffectivethanlettersinexpandingfluoridevarnishcoverage(althoughphoningallfamiliesmaybemorecostlyinurbancentresthanruralareas).Follow-upphonecallsprovidedapointofcontactinruralareaswheredentalstaffcouldnotattendCHCsandhadlimitedinteractionwithparents.Participantsacrosstheprovincementionedthatphonecallsworkedwellwithsomevulnerablepopulations.
• Researchindicatesthattelephonecontact,althoughcostly,ismoreeffectivethanletterstoincreasevaccinationrates.57Researchalsoindicatesthatrecallandremindersystemscanhave“spillovereffects”inincreasingpreventivecareandprimarycarevisits.58
• Whereappropriateandconvenientforfamilies,dentalstaffcouldusetextmessagingtoreducethecostofcommunicationforfamilies,particularlyyoungerfamilieswithlowerincomes.
2v. To what extent does the dental health risk assessment/screening reach young children?Electronicchildhealthrecordswerenotavailableforanalysis,andsotheactualnumberofchildrenreceivingthedentalhealthriskassessmentisunknown.Inthefourhealthauthoritiesthatprovidedentalhealthriskassessmentat12-monthimmunizationclinics,dentalstaffreportedthattheywerenotreachingfamiliesthatdonotaccess12-monthimmunizationsthroughpublichealth.About35%ofimmunizationsinBCareprovidedbyphysicians(and90%inVancouverandRichmond).59Also,BCimmunizationcoverageratesdonotincludeFirstNationsandInuitchildrenlivingonreservewhereimmunizationisdeliveredbyBandNursesorbyFirstNationsandInuitHealth.
55AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,Research Brief: Fluoride Varnish: an Evidence-Based Approach.56ThiscomponentisincludedinthePopulationHealthandWellnessServicePlan2007/2008.57V.J.JacobsonandP.Szilagyi,“Patientreminderandpatientrecallsystemstoimproveimmunizationrates,”Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(Online),no.3(2005):CD003941.58LanceE.Rodewaldetal.,“ARandomizedStudyofTrackingWithOutreachandProviderPromptingtoImproveImmunizationCoverageandPrimaryCare,”Pediatrics103,no.1(1999):31-38.59BCCentreforDiseaseControl,ImmunizationinBritishColumbia,2006-2007(Vancouver,BC:BCCentreforDiseaseControl,2009).
page38
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Inregionsthatprovidedriskassessmentincommunitysites,dentalstaffexpressedconcernthattheprogramwasnotreachingthepopulationsthatcouldmostbenefit.Onespeculationmadewasthatthosefamilieswithat-homechildcare(e.g.,providedbyextendedfamilymemberssuchasgrandparentsoraunts),wouldbedisproportionatelyexcludedfromtheprogram’sreach:
“I think we missed a lot of young families at home, that are at home, and aren’t attending groups. That’s where something like an intensive home visiting program [could be useful] ... where the Public Health Nurse is really connected to the family, and brings in the dental component as needed.”
2vi. To what extent does the program identify a broad spectrum of children at risk for caries?Dentalstaffdescribedarangeofdemographicgroupswhooftendonotaccesspublichealthservices,andthereforedonotreceiveinformationaboutdentalhealthprogramsorkeyoralhealthmessaging.Assuch,focusgroupparticipantsfeltthatthesegroupswereathigherriskfordevelopingcariesandmightnotbeaccessingthepreventiveservicesofferedbydentalpublichealth.Whendiscussingthespecificdemographicgroupswhowereparticularlyhard-to-reach,dentalstaffprimarilyreferredto:familieswithlowincome,lone-parentfamilies,familiesresidinginruralorremotelocations,recentimmigrantfamilies,familiesofAboriginaldescent,andfamilieswithspecialneeds.Resultsfromthe2009/10KindergartenDentalSurveycorroboratethedentalstaff’sidentificationoftheabovementioneddemographicgroups,withparticularlyhighimportancescores,attheneighbourhood-level,forareaswithhigherproportionsofindividualswithnohighschoolgraduation(accountingfor40.1%ofvariabilityinkindergartendentaldecay,ofAboriginalidentity(22.8%),notfluentinEnglish(12.9%),andwithlowincome(10.3%).ResultsforAboriginalchildrenshowthat28.5%ofAboriginalkindergarten-agedchildrenhaduntreatedvisibledecay,comparedto16.2%ofnon-Aboriginalchildren(and34.5%ofFirstNationschildrenattendingFirstNationsschoolsonreserve).60Takentogether,thesefindingsunderscoretheneedforearlychildhoodpreventiveservicestobetailoredforpopulationsofconcern.
2vii. For those eligible children who dental public health is not reaching, what are the barriers?
OneofthebarrierstoprogramreachthatwasmentionedinrelationtotheHealthAuthoritytargetnumbersforassessmentwasstaffworkloadssuchthatmanagerstendedtofocusoncommunitysitesknowntoprovideeasyaccesstochildren.Asoneparticipantstated:
60BCMinistryofHealthServices,Dental Survey of Aboriginal Kindergarten-Aged Children 2009-2010: A Provincial and First Nations School Analysis(Victoria,BC:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealthandServices,2011).
Themostcommonlyreferencedbarrierstoaccessingpreventativedentalcarewerefamilies’overridingdailystressors,lackoftransportation,lack/expenseoftelephone,languagebarriers,distrustofpublichealthprofessionals.
KEY
FIN
DIN
G
page39
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
“[managers might say], ‘oh I know that preschool over there, I know I can get my numbers over there, so let’s go there.’ ...So, it often wasn’t a really high risk group or really vulnerable population we were reaching, because it was sort of the pathway of least resistance in a period of time that they had to reach this goal [of reaching a certain number of children].”
Intermsofbarrierstohealthcareaccessforfamilies,focusgroupdiscussionswerelargelyconsistentwithCanadianOralHealthStrategyrecommendationsforim-provingsocial/culturalaccesstooralhealth(i.e.,accesstooralhealthcareinacomfortablesettingwheretheclientcanfeelateasefromacultural,social,andlinguisticpointofview).61Dentalstaffdescribedmultipleintercon-nectedbarriersthatcancreateaccessissuestooralhealthcare,includingoverridingdailystressors,lackoftransportation,lack/ex-penseoftelephone,languagebarriers,adistrustofhealthprofes-sionals,andlimitstotheFirstNa-tionsHealthBenefitprogram.Barriersarediscussedbelowinfurtherdetail.
Overriding stressors:familiesmayoftengivepreventivedentalhealthconcernsalowprioritystatuswhenjuxtaposedwithmoreimmediatedailyneeds,suchasobtainingfood,workingirregularhours,copingwithdomesticviolence,addressinglanguagebarriers,orperhapsattendingmoreimportantappointments,suchasthosewithsocialworkers.
Transportation:manyfamiliesmaynothaveaccesstotransportation,orpublictransportationmayseemtoocumbersomewithachildin-tow,especiallywhenconsideredinconjunctionwiththeoverridingstressorsmentionedabove.
Language barriers:thesocietaldiscriminationexperiencedbypeoplewithEnglishasasecondlanguagemaymakethemmorecautioustoenterpotentiallyculturallyincongruentenvironments,suchasthoseposedbypublichealthoffices.Additionally,thedifficultyandstressofcommunicatingwithanEnglishspeakingdentalpractitionerwhomightusespecializedjargonmaybeparticularlyinhibitoryforfamilieswhohaveEnglishasasecondlanguage.
Distrust of public health professionals:manyfamiliesmayavoidpublichealthservices,regardlessofneed,duetoafearofchildapprehensionand/orbeingreportedtochildwelfareagencies.62, 63AsunderscoredbytheBCAboriginalChildareSociety:64
61Federal,ProvincialandTerritorialDentalDirectors,A Canadian oral health strategy(TheFederal,Provincial,TerritorialDentalDirectorsGroup,2005),http://www.fptdwg.ca/assets/PDF/Canadian%20Oral%20Health%20Strategy%20-%20Final.pdf.62BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,Handbook of Best Practices in Aboriginal Early Childhood Programs,2003(Vancouver,BC:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2003).63AlisonGerlach,Steps in the Right Direction: Connecting & Collaborating in Early Intervention Therapy with Aboriginal Families & Communities in British Columbia,1sted.(Vancouver,B.C.:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2007).64BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,BC Aboriginal Child Care Society Responds to Ministry of Education Draft Early Learning Framework(Vancouver,BC:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2007).
“There’s so many factors – life is hard for a lot of our, the families of children, you know, they might be dealing with alcoholism or drug use or physical abuse, or, and unhealthy situations. So … fluoride varnish? … teeth are really low on the radar.”
Focus-Group-Participant, FHA
page40
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
“Because of the history of residential schools, the child protection system / “60”s scoop”, and other aspects of the relationship between First Nations and institutions of mainstream society, many First Nations families are wary of entrusting their young children to formal, non-familial care and education programs (p. 5).”
TheabovebarriersthatwereconfirmedbydentalstaffalsomirrorthosebarrierstoaccessinghealthandearlychilddevelopmentresourcesthatHELPidentifiedinconjunctionwithcommunityserviceproviders:Transportation,Language,SocialDistance(e.g.,lackoftrust,embarrassment),TimePoverty,andParentalConsciousness(e.g.,awarenessofthebenefitsofprograms/services).65
Ofnotewithrespecttobarrierstoaccessingpreventivedentalcare,isthatdentalstaffreportedthattheabovementionedbarrierscandisproportionatelyaffectspecificdemographicgroups:familieswithlowincome,lone-parentfamilies,familiesresidinginruralorremotelocations,recentimmigrantfamilies,familiesofAboriginaldescent,andthosefamilieswithspecialneeds.Additionally,oneshouldunderstandthatbarriersmaynotbeeasilyaddressedinisolationfromeachother,asfamiliescanexperiencemultiplebarriers.Considerationofthesebarrierscouldbeusefulinplanningfutureservicedelivery.
Considering Aboriginal CommunitiesAsstatedabove,Aboriginalidentityaccountedfor22.8%ofthevariabilityofdentaldecayinthe2009/10Kindergartensurvey,andassuch,AboriginalidentityisasignificantpredictorofdevelopingearlychildhooddentaldecayinBritishColumbia.FirstNationspeopleonreservereceiveamixofdentalhealthpreventionservicesfundedthroughregionalhealthauthoritiesandHealthCanada’sFirstNationsandInuitHealthprogram(includingtheChildren’sOralHealthInitiative).66BarrierspreventingAboriginalfamiliesfromaccessingoralhealthcarewhichwerediscussedinthefocusgroupincluded:lackoftransportation,missedimmunizationappointmentsduetotoomanyoverridingstressors,asenseofmistrusttowardspublichealthservices,bandnursesnotbeingawareofcariesriskscreening,andAboriginalparentsnotfeelingcomfortablewithenteringhealthunits.67
UnderstandingandappreciatingthesebarrierstoaccesscanhelppublichealthdentalstafftobetterreachAboriginalfamiliesandcommunitiesonthetopicoforal-healthcare.UNICEFCanadastatedthat“nowhereisthehealthdisparitybetweenAboriginalandnon-Aboriginalchildrenmoreevidentthanindentalhealth.”68InoneAboriginalcommunitywithinOntario,forexample,74%ofthechildrenbetween3and5yearsofagehadpreviousexperiencewithcariouslesions.FocusgroupdiscussionspertainingtomethodsfordismantlingbarrierstocarethatmanyAboriginalfamiliesexperiencecenteredon:culturalsafetytrainingfordentalstaff,communityoutreachinitiatives,communitypartnerships,andtryingtomitigatesomeoftheextraneousstressorssuchastransportation.
65J.Schroederetal.,Creating Communities for Young Children: A Toolkit for Change(Vancouver,BC:HumanEarlyLearningPartnership,2009).66BCMinistryofHealthServices,Dental Survey of Aboriginal Kindergarten-Aged Children 2009-2010: A Provincial and First Nations School Analysis.67UNICEFCanada,“Aboriginalchildren’shealth:Leavingnochildbehind”(CanadianUNICEFCommittee,2009),15.68UNICEFCanada,“Aboriginalchildren’shealth:Leavingnochildbehind.”
page41
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
SummaryOverall,thefindingsrelatedtocariesriskassessmentandbarrierstoaccessingpublichealthserviceshighlighttwoareasforfutureconsideration.First,thevarietyofhealthauthorityriskassessmenttoolsandguidelinesthatarecurrentlybeingusedacrosstheprovincecouldbestandardizedintoonecoherentandcomprehensivetoolkitforusebyallhealthauthorities.Thisstandardizedtoolkitcouldincludeariskassessmenttool,guidelinesandfollow-uptechniquesthataregroundedinthekeythemesthatemergedfromtheenvironmentalscan.Second,thefindingsilluminatedthespecifictypesofbarriersthatpreventfamiliesfromaccessingpublichealthservices,andthatdisproportionallyaffectpopulationsofconcern.
page42
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES
3. Are health promotion interventions effective in supporting family dental health practices toward reducing early childhood caries?
Publichealthdentalfocusgroupparticipantsindicatedthatforparticipatingfamilies,thedentalhealthriskassessmentwaseffectiveinsupportinghealthyparentpracticeswhenusedinconjunctionwithpreventivecounseling,education,oradditionalsupport.Strategiesforsupportinghealthyparentpracticeshighlightedbydentalstaffincludedtailoredgrouphealtheducationsessionstopopulationsofconcern,buildingrapportandtrust,motivationalinterviewing,roleplaying,andtoothfairycostumes.DentalstaffinVCHAandVIHAattributedimprovementsinparentawarenessandchildren’soralhealthtodentalstaffcommunityhealthpromotioneffortsprioritizingpreschoolprogramsasjuice-freeenvironments.Dentalstaffacrossallhealthauthoritiesreporteddifficultyreachingvulnerablepopulationsasabarriertoprogramcoverageandeffectivenessingeneral.
Asystematicreviewoftheresearchconcludedthatstrategiestargetinghigh-riskgroupswithinawholepopulationmayhelpreduceinequalitiesinoralhealth.69Mailingfluoridetoothpastetoaspecific“at-risk”populationofchildrenfrom12monthsonwardalsowasassociatedwithreducedcariesprevalenceinkindergartenchildren.70In2004,aGlasgowcommunitydevelopmentprograminalowincomeareaaimedtodeliverconsistentmessages,improvediet,provideaccesstofluoridetoothpaste,andsupportpreschooltoothbrushingprograms.71Overfouryears,thismulti-strategyprogramwasassociatedwithsignificantimprovementsinpreschooldentalhealth.Similartoourfindings,arecentUSfocusgroupstudyamongcaregiverswithlowincomesconcludedthatcommunity-basedoralhealthinitiativesshouldemphasizedevelopingtrustofcaregiverswithserviceproviders.72
69AndrewJ.Sprod,RobertAnderson,andElizabethT.Treasure,Effective oral health promotion: literature review,Technicalreports20(Cardiff:HealthPromotionWales,1996).70G.M.Daviesetal.,“Arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofprovidingfreefluoridetoothpastefromtheageof12monthsonreducingcariesin5-6yearoldchildren,”Community Dent.Health19,no.3(2002):131-136.71YBlairetal.,“Glasgownursery-basedcariesexperience,beforeandafteracommunitydevelopment-basedoralhealthprogramme’simplementation,”Community Dental Health21,no.4(2004):291-298.72S.E.Kellyetal.,“BarrierstoCare-SeekingforChildren’sOralHealthAmongLow-IncomeCaregivers,”Am J Public Health95,no.8(2005):1345-1351.
Healthyfamilydentalpracticesmaybemosteffectivelysupportedbytailoringservicesforpopulationsofconcernandbuildingtrustwithfamiliesthroughclient-centeredapproaches(e.g.,MotivationalInterviewing).
KEY
FIN
DIN
G
page43
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS
4. What strategies are used in the health authorities to prevent early childhood dental disease? What is the most effective combination of strategies being provided in the health authorities to prevent early childhood dental disease?
Inadditiontothedentalhealthriskassessmentandfluoridevarnishprograms,dentalstaffdescribedseveralpreventivestrategiesusedinhealthauthorities,asoutlinedbelow.
Community outreach:Communityoutreachwasfrequentlymentionedasthemosteffectivestrategyforreachinghard-to-reachpopulationsthatweretypicallymissedbypublichealthdentalteams.ThisfindingisechoedbytheUSSurgeonGeneralrecommendationthat“partnershipsbeusedtoimprovedoralhealth.”73Bybuildingpartnershipswithcommunityorganizations,publichealthdentalprogramscanefficientlyexpandtheirprogramcoveragetoincludethefamiliesthatthecommunitypartnersalreadyworkwith.Typesofcommunitypartnerswhichwerehighlightedbydentalstaffincluded:drop-inprograms,healthfairs,communityevents,supportgroups,infantprograms,parentinggroups,earlychildhooddevelopmentnetworks,preschools,schooldistricts,andindividualcommunitychampions.SpecificorganizationsthatwerementionedinreferencetocommunityoutreachincludedStrongStart,HealthiestBabiesPossible,andAboriginalFriendshipCentres.Similarly,theSurgeonGenerallistedcommunityprogramssuchasHeadStartandsupplementalfoodprogramsaspotentialpartners.Additionally,Andersen’srevisedaccesstocaremodelincludescommunityprogramsasenablingfactorsthatmaybeprecursorsforutilizationofavailableoralhealthservices.74Communityprogramscanimprovethelinksbetweenfamiliesandoralhealthcarethroughreferralsandnetworking,75withcommunityprogramstaffbeingwell-positionedtoidentifychildrenvulnerabletocariesatanearlyage.76
Building rapport and trust with families:Afocusonbuildingarapportwithfamilieswasrepeatedlyhighlightedasbeinganeffectivestrategyforreducingearlychildhoodcaries.Buildingtrust,rapport,andrespectwithclientsoftenencouragestheclients,induetime,tofollowhealthpractitioner’ssuggestionsforhealth-promotingpractices.77Accordingtoparticipants,buildingrapportmay
73DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General(Rockville,MD:DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,NationalInstituteofDentalandCraniofacialResearch,NationalInstitutesofHealth,2000).74RonaldAndersen,Changing the US health care system: Key issues in health services, policy, and management,2nded.(SanFranciscoCalif.:Jossey-Bass,2001).75C.M.Jonesetal.,“Creatingpartnershipsforimprovingoralhealthoflow-incomechildren,”Journal of Public Health Dentistry60,no.3(2000):193-196.76JessicaY.Lee,“Chapter10:Communityprogramsandoralhealth,”inEarly Childhood Oral Health,ed.JoelH.BergandRebeccaL.Slayton(Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009),223-236.77KarenSaucierLundyandSharynJanes,Community health nursing: Caring for the public’s health(Sudbury,MA:Jones&Bartlett,2009).
Preventivestrategiescouldincludecommunityoutreachandpartnership-building,integrationwithexistingpublichealthprograms,andsupportingfamiliesinaccessingdentalcare.
KEY
FIN
DIN
G
page44
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
allowcaregiverstofeelmoreateasetodisclosemoreaccurateinformation,fromwhichdentalstaffcanprovidethemostappropriatefollow-up.Additionally,buildingrapportwithfamiliescanhelptobuildtrustbetweencaregiversanddentalstaff,alackofwhichisstatedtoinhibitsomepopulationsfrommorefrequentlyaccessingpublichealthservices.Aboriginalpopulationsforexample,areperhapstheonepopulationwiththemostentrencheddistrusttowardspublichealthinitiativesduetothedecadesofunqualifiedremovalofAboriginalchildrenfromAboriginalfamilies.ApplyingtheirframeworkfororalhealthdisparitiesinacasestudyofAlaska,Patrickandcolleaguesmaintainthat“rapport,trust,andtribalcooperation/collaborationandendorsementarenecessarytoaddresscommunityoralhealthissues.”78AfocusonearningthetrustofAboriginalfamiliesandcommunities,maythereforebe,themosteffectivestrategyforaddressingdentalhealthissuesinAboriginalcommunities.PleasenotethatanimportantprecursortoearningthetrustofAboriginalfamiliesmaybeimplementingculturalsafetytrainingforstaff.Culturalsafetydiffersfromculturalsensitivity,inthatitshiftsthefocusfromindividualinteractionstosocietal/structurallevelinequitiesforminoritygroups.79, 80Ithelpsparticipantstothinkcriticallyabouttheirownsocialpositionbybeing“mindfuloftheirownsociocultural,economic,andhistoricallocation.”81Societallevelpowerimbalancesbecomesalientinculturalsafetytraining,leadingtomoresensitiveandeffectiveservices.82AnAboriginalculturalsafetytrainingworkshopdeliveredtoGeneralPractitionersinAustralia,foundthatthemosteffectiveculturalsafetytrainingprocedureswerethosethatweredevelopedinpartnershipwithlocalAboriginalcommunities;theseworkshopswerereportedtohavealongtermeffectonchangestoclinicalpracticesandtheGP’sability/comforttoliaisewithlocalAboriginalcommunities.83
Building partnerships with other health practitioners:Buildingpartnershipswithhealthpractitioners,includingotherpublichealthpractitionersandprimarycareproviders,similartothecommunitypartnershipsdiscussedabove,canexpandprogramcoveragebyreachingthosefamiliesthatotherhealthpractitionersarereaching.Withinpublichealth,partnershipswithPublicHealthNurses,healthunitaides,andadministrativestaff,allofwhomcanplayakeyroleinmakingreferrals,couldbequitevaluable.Bothimprovedhealthoutcomesandsignificantbehaviorchangeshavebeenempiricallylinkedtopartnershipbuildinginpublichealth.84Coordinatedcareinvolvingprimarycareproviderscanfacilitatereferrals,preventionoforaldiseaseandhealthpromotion,andearlyidentificationofdentaldisease.85
78D.L.Patricketal.,“ReducingOralHealthDisparities:AFocusonSocialandCulturalDeterminants,”BMC Oral Health6,no.1(2006):S4-S4.79N.R.Polaschek,“Culturalsafety:anewconceptinnursingpeopleofdifferentethnicities,”Journal of Advanced Nursing27,no.3(1998):452-457.80NationalAboriginalHealthOrganization,Cultural Competency and Safety: A Guide for Health Care Administrators, Providers and Educators(NationalAboriginalHealthOrganization,2008).81J.Andersonetal.,“‘Rewriting’culturalsafetywithinthepostcolonialandpostnationalfeministproject:Towardnewepistemologiesofhealing,”Advances in Nursing Science26,no.3(2003):196.82F.Hart-Wasekeesikaw,D.Gregory,andM.Hart,Cultural Competence and Cultural Safety in First Nations, Inuit and Métis Nursing Education: An Integrated Review of the Literature(Ottawa,ON:AboriginalNursesAssociationofCanada,2009).83AboriginalHealthCouncilofWesternAustralia,Delivery of a Cultural Safety Training Pilot Program: Final Report to The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (Perth, Western Australia: Aboriginal Health Council of Western Australia, 2005).84PartnershipforthePublic’sHealth(ProgramOffice),Strategies for Building Community-Public Health Partnerships(California,US,2007).85WendyMouradianandRussellMaier,“Thetotalhealthteam:Workingtogethertoimprovechildren’shealth,”inEarly
“Relationship building and building trust – I think that’s key for getting that prevention and health promotion messaging out.”
Focus Group Participant, VCHA
page45
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Partnershipbuilding,asastrategyforprovidingoralhealthcareiscommensuratewithanupstreamapproachtohealthcarewhichconsiderstheunderlyingsocialdeterminantsoforalhealth.86, 87Collaborationandcoordinationshouldalsobeconsideredwithfederalprogramsthatprovideservicesonreserve,suchastheChildren’sOralHealthInitiative(COHI),HealthCanada’sMaternalandChildHealthprogram,andFirstNationsandInuitHealth.
Advocacy efforts:Manydentalstaffstrivedtoactasadvocatesinfacilitatingaccesstooralhealthcareforfamiliesinneed.Advocacyeffortsincluded:a)workingwithfamiliesandcommunitychampionstofacilitateaccesstoreduced-costservicesanddentalaccessfunds,b)phoningdentalreceptioniststoadvocateforaclientafteramissedappointment,andc)maintaininglistsofdentistsandinformationregardingtheaccessibilityofvariousdentalservices.
TheseeffortssupportCanadianOralHealthStrategy88recommendationsforhealthregionsto:
• Maintaininformationonoralhealthprofessionalswhoprovideservicesoutsidethetraditionalpracticesettings,andtheirexperiencesandchallenges;
• Continueeffortstodevelopprogramsandservicesthatrecognizethedifferenthealthcareneedsofthesectorsthathavereducedaccesstocare;
• Arrangeclinicsfororalcareusingacollaborativeteamapproach.
Somedentalstaffalsofacilitateroleplayingactivitiesinparentgroups,whichfocusonhowtocommunicatewithdentalreceptionistswhentheyarehavingdifficultyobtaininganappointment(e.g.,afterapreviousmissedappointment).Dentalstaffhavedescribedroleplayingactivitiesasbeingabletohelpparentstolearnhowtoself-advocatefortheirchild’soralhealth,tolearnstrategiesforre-entryintothedentistclinic,andtounderstandhowmissingappointmentsimpactsthedentaloffice.Additionally,dentalstaffhaveworkedtofacilitateaccesstotheChildren’sOralHealthInitiative(COHI)byencouragingandsupportingAboriginalcommunityapplicationstothisfederalprogramfundedbyFirstNationsandInuitHealth.
Inadvocatingforindividualchildren’accesstodentalcare,dentalstaffmembersarerespondingtoadocumentedsocialgradientinaccesstodentalcare89, 90, 91wherebyhealthinequalitiesandtypesandnumbersofbarrierstoaccessingservicesarestronglytiedtolevelsofsocioeconomicadvantage.AdditionalrecommendationsforhealthregionstoimproveaccesstocarefromtheCanadianOralHealthStrategyinclude:
• Providecontinuingeducationonoralhealthserviceprovisionforspecialpopulationsthatexhibitlowdentalserviceutilizationrates.
• Increasethedeliveryoforalhealthcareoutofcommunityhealthcenters.
Childhood Oral Health(Iowa:JohnWileyandSons,2009),237-261.86R.G.Watt,“Fromvictimblamingtoupstreamaction:tacklingthesocialdeterminantsoforalhealthinequalities,”Community Dent.Oral Epidemiol.35,no.1(2007):1-11.87S.Gehlertetal.,“Targetinghealthdisparities:Amodellinkingupstreamdeterminantstodownstreaminterventions,”Health Affairs27,no.2(2008):339-349.88Federal,ProvincialandTerritorialDentalDirectors,ACanadianoralhealthstrategy.89A.N.Donaldsonetal.,“Theeffectsofsocialclassanddentalattendanceonoralhealth,”Journal of Dental Research87,no.1(2008):60-64. 90X.-L.Gaoetal.,“Behavioralpathwaysexplainingoralhealthdisparityinchildren,”Journal of Dental Research89,no.9(2010):985-990.91A.E.Sanders,A.J.Spencer,andG.D.Slade,“Evaluatingtheroleofdentalbehaviourinoralhealthinequalities,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology34,no.1(2006):71-79.
page46
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
• Increaseawarenessandmobilizethepublictoadvocateforuniversalaccesstodentalcare,whichiswelldesignedandadequatelyfunded.
Outreach to prenatal and postnatal groups:Giventhatcariogenicbacteriacanbetransmittedfromcaregivertochildandmaternaloralhealthisastrongindicatorofchildren’soralhealth,evenaftercontrollingforpovertystatus,92, 93preventioneffortsattheprenatalstagecanreducetheriskofECC.94, 95, 96, 97, 98Prenatalgroupswerediscussedinthefocusgroupsasanidealplacetoconductpreventiveeducationbeforedailyparentingbecomesanoverridingpriority.
Promoting healthy preschool environments:Somedentalstaffhaveworkedwiththeirlocalpreschoolstopromotejuice-freeenvironments,whichnotonlyreducesthechildren’ssugarintake,butalsohelpsparentstobuildanawarenessofgoodoralhealthpractices.Dentalstaffreportedobservablereductionsintheamountofearlychildhoodcariesfoundinthepreschoolswithwhichtheyhavepartneredtocreatejuice-freeenvironments.Onestudyfoundthatpreschoolpoliciesonavailabilityoffoodsandsnackscanleadtoreducedsugarintakeinthepreschoolandathome.99
What are the most effective combinations of strategies being used to reduce early childhood caries?Programeffectivenesswasnotquantifiableduetoalackofconsistentelectronichealthrecordsdatalinkingdeliveryofpreventiveservicestochildhealthoutcomes.Inthefocusgroups,publichealthdentalstaffemphasizedtheintegrationofpreventivedentalserviceswithexistingpublichealthandcommunitypartnerinitiativesasawaytoimprovedentalhealthoutcomes.Therewerefrequentcallsforspecificpreventivestrategiesincluding:integrationwithexistingcommunityinitiatives,communitydevelopment,partnership-building,promotionofhealthypreschoolenvironments,andinvolvementofinterdisciplinarypublichealthteams.
Whenaskedtoidentifypriorityactivitiesforallocationofstafftime,IHAdentalstaffrankedcommunity-levelservicesaspriorityactivitiestheycouldspendmoretimeontohaveahigherimpactonoralhealthstatus.Inparticular:• Developingadentalprogrambasedonidentifieddentalneeds,inconjunctionwiththehealthunitteamandcommunity.
• Providingdeliveryofdentalhealthlessons/demonstrationsforindividuals,parents,children(e.g.,StrongStartsites),andgroupsincommunitysettings.
• Coordinatinginter-agencyprogramsinthecommunityrelatedtothedentalprogram.
92J.Lapirattanakuletal.,“Demonstrationofmother-to-childtransmissionofstreptococcusmutansusingmultilocussequencetyping,”Caries Research42,no.6(2008):466-474.93B.A.Dyeetal.,“Assessingtherelationshipbetweenchildren’soralhealthstatusandthatoftheirmothers,”Journal of the American Dental Association(1939)142,no.2(2011):173-183.94S.S.Gomez,A.A.Weber,andC.G.Emilson,“Aprospectivestudyofacariespreventionprograminpregnantwomenandtheirchildrenfiveandsixyearsofage,”ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children68,no.3(2001):191-195,152. 95S.S.Gomezetal.,“Prolongedeffectofamother–childcariespreventiveprogramondentalcariesinthepermanent1stmolarsin9to10-year-oldchildren,”Acta Odontologica Scandinavica65,no.5(2007):271-274. 96P.Isokangasetal.,“Occurrenceofdentaldecayinchildrenaftermaternalconsumptionofxylitolchewinggum,afollow-upfrom0to5yearsofage,”Journal of Dental Research79,no.11(2000):1885-1889. 97K.Meyer,W.Geurtsen,andH.Günay,“Anearlyoralhealthcareprogramstartingduringpregnancy,”Clinical Oral Investigations14,no.3(2009):257-264.98K.PlutzerandA.J.Spencer,“Efficacyofanoralhealthpromotioninterventioninthepreventionofearlychildhoodcaries,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology36,no.4(2008):335-346. 99C.S.RodriguesandA.Sheiham,“Therelationshipsbetweendietaryguidelines,sugarintakeandcariesinprimaryteethinlowincomeBrazilian3-year-olds:alongitudinalstudy,”International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry10,no.1(2000):47-55.
page47
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
ResearchintheUnitedStateshasuncoveredsimilarfindingstotheextentthattheU.S.SurgeonGeneralhasendorsedpartnershipsasawaytoimprovedentaloutcomes.100Childreninvolvedwithcommunityinitiatives,programs,ororganizationshaveanincreasedlikelihoodofdentistvisitation,as“communityprogramscanserveasavehicletoincreaseaccesstotheoralhealthcaresystem.”101
Areviewofpublichealtheducationinterventionsconcludedthatforschool-agedchildren,healtheducationinterventionsaloneareinsufficienttochangeparenthealthpracticesbutcanbeeffectivewhencombinedwithenvironmentalorlegislativechanges,suchaschangestoschoolmeals.102One-to-onedentalhealtheducationhasnotbeenfoundtobeconsistentlyeffectiveinchangingbehaviour.103Similarly,one-to-onedietaryadvicehasnotbeenconclusivelyshowntopreventcaries.Astudyoflow-incomeBrazilianchildrenfoundthatpreschoolpoliciesonavailabilityoffoodsandsnackscanleadtoreducedsugarintakeinthepreschoolandathome.104Thisisconsistentwiththefocusgroupfindingsonpromotinghealthypreschoolenvironments.
Aschool-basededucationprogramdemonstratedasustainedimprovementinplaquescoresforchildreninmoreadvantagedareas,whereaschildrenfromlessadvantagedareasshowednobenefitfromtheprogram.105Thissuggeststhatinsomecasesuniversalprogramsmayservetoincreasesocialinequitiesinoralhealth,possiblyowingtofamiliesfrommoreadvantagedareasfacingfewerbarrierstoadoptingoralhealthpractices.Whileatargetedapproachwithinthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedareasmayaddresstheurgentunmetdentaltreatmentneedsofthemostseverelyaffectedchildren(e.g.,Codes3.3,3.4,and04),thisdoesnotaddressoralhealthinmiddle-incomeareas,inwhichalargeproportionofchildrenhavingexperiencewithtreateddecayand/ornewdecayreside(e.g.,Codes02,3.1).TheMarmotReviewadvocatesforwhattheycallproportionateuniversalism,statingthat“toreducethesteepnessofthesocialgradientinhealth,actionsmustbeuniversal,butwithascaleandintensitythatisproportionatetothelevelofdisadvantage.”106
SummaryOverallthefindingspertinenttoevaluationquestion#4suggestthatbuildingpartnershipsandrelationshipswithcommunityorganizations,publichealthpractitioners,andfamilies,canbehighlyinfluentialwithrespecttoincreasingprogramreach,effectiveness,andefficiency.Itisnotjustthatmoreservicesareneeded,butthatservicesneedtobeofferedthroughcertaintypesofpartnerships,suchasthosewithpreschools,prenatalgroups,publichealthnurses,andearlychildhoodservices.ThisfindingiscommensuratewithrecommendationsfromtheCanadianOralHealthStrategyreportwhichstatesthataccessneedstobeconsideredalonggeographic,financial,social,cultural,andlegislativeterms.107
100Lee,“Chapter10:Communityprogramsandoralhealth.” 101Ibid. 102ScottishExecutive,Nursing for health: a review of the contribution of nurses, midwives and health visitors to improving the public’s health in Scotland(Edinburgh:TheStationeryOffice,2001). 103E.KayandD.Locker,“Asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofhealthpromotionaimedatimprovingoralhealth,”CommunityDentalHealth15,no.3(1998):132-144;E.KayandD.Locker,“Isdentalhealtheducationeffective?Asystematicreviewofcurrentevidence,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology24,no.4(1996):231-235.104RodriguesandSheiham,“Therelationshipsbetweendietaryguidelines,sugarintakeandcariesinprimaryteethinlowincomeBrazilian3-year-olds.” 105Sprod,Anderson,andTreasure,Effective oral health promotion. 106StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,“Fairsociety,healthylives:TheMarmotreview”(StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,2010).107Grindefjordetal.,“Predictionofdentalcariesdevelopmentin1-year-oldchildren.”
page48
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
GENERAL THEMES
Threebroadthemescharacterizethefindings:surveillanceissues,standardizationofassessmenttools,andpartnershipbuilding.
Surveillance: Is the oral health of young children improving?
Change over time and variability in dental decay rates across BC neighbourhoodsTheresultsoftheKindergartenDentalSurveyindicatedthat,ataprovinciallevel,thereweremodestimprovementsindentalstatusatkindergartenacrossthetwodentalsurveyyears.Thesechangeswerenotuniform,however,astherewerechangesinvisibledentaldecayrates(increasesanddecreases)thatweremoreextensiveinsomegeographiclocationsthanothers.
Similarly,visibledentaldecayratesineachsurveyyearvariedacrossneighbourhoodswithsomeinstancesofadjacentneighbourhoodshavingdisparatevisibledentaldecayoutcomes(e.g.,TsawwassenNorth,DawsonCreekCentre).ThesedifferencesindentalhealthoutcomesacrossgeographicareasinBCindicateoralhealthdisparitiesthatparallelthosefoundwithotherhealthoutcomes,suchaslifeexpectancyandprematuremortalityrates.
Social influences on dental health outcomesThefindingsfromthisprojectsuggestthatvariationinvisibledentaldecayratesacrossregionswasnotrandom.Theratesofvisibledecayinthemajorityofneighbourhoodssurveyedindicatedthatsocialfactors,includingthesocioeconomicconditionsanddemographiccharacteristicsthatcharacterizewhereachildlives,werepredictiveofdentalhealthoutcomesatkindergarten.Childrenresidinginmoresocioeconomicallyadvantagedareastendedtohavelowerratesofvisibledentaldecaythanthosechildrenresidinginsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedareas.Thisfindingisconsistentwiththelargebodyofevidenceindicatingtheinfluencethatindividual-andneighbourhood-levelsocioeconomiccircumstanceshaveondisparatehealthoutcomesacrossgeographicareas.108, 109, 110, 111, 112,113, 114, 115, 116
Analysisofthekindergartendentalsurveydatainboth2006/07and2009/10indicatedthattherewasvisibledentaldecayforapproximatelyhalfofthe
108W.Sabbahetal.,“Theroleofhealth-relatedbehaviorsinthesocioeconomicdisparitiesinoralhealth,”Social Science & Medicine68,no.2(2009):298-303. 109J.M.Armfield,“Socioeconomicinequalitiesinchildoralhealth:Acomparisonofdiscreteandcompositearea-basedmeasures,”Journal of Public Health Dentistry67,no.2(2007):119-125. 110J.L.F.Antunesetal.,“Spatialanalysistoidentifydifferentialsindentalneedsbyarea-basedmeasures,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology30,no.2(2002):133-142. 111L.G.Doetal.,“TrendofIncome-relatedInequalityofChildOralHealthinAustralia,”Journal of Dental Research 89,no.9(2010):959-964. 112K.A.Levinetal.,“Inequalitiesindentalcariesof5-year-oldchildreninScotland,1993–2003,”TheEuropeanJournalofPublicHealth19,no.3(2009):337-342. 113K.E.PickettandM.Pearl,“Multilevelanalysesofneighbourhoodsocioeconomiccontextandhealthoutcomes:acriticalreview,”Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health55,no.2(2001):111-122. 114M.Tellezetal.,“Assessmentoftherelationshipbetweenneighborhoodcharacteristicsanddentalcariesseverityamonglow-incomeAfrican-Americans:Amultilevelapproach,”Journal of public health dentistry66,no.1(2006):30–36.115G.Turrelletal.,“Theindependentcontributionofneighborhooddisadvantageandindividual-levelsocioeconomicpositiontoself-reportedoralhealth:amultilevelanalysis,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology35,no.3(2007):195-206. 116S.Willemsetal.,“Theindependentimpactofhousehold-andneighborhood-basedsocialdeterminantsonearlychildhoodcaries:across-sectionalstudyofinner-citychildren,”Family & Community Health28,no.2(2005):168.
page49
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
childreninthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoodsinBC.Ratesofvisibledentaldecaydecreasedor,inotherwords,improved,withincreasingsocioeconomicstatusoftheneighbourhood.In2009/10,themostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoodshaveareportedvisibledentaldecayrateof48%,whereasavisibledentaldecayrateof30%,onaverage,wasreportedinareaswiththehighestsocioeconomicadvantage.Althoughtheprecisemechanismforthis‘socialgradient’indentalhealthoutcomeshasnotbeenestablished,itisclearthatdifferencesindentalhealthoutcomesexist.
Theanalysisofthekindergartendentalsurveydataindicatedthatin2006/07and2009/10,theaveragerateofvisibledentaldecaywashighestinthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoods;whereasinthemoderatetomoderatelyhighsocioeconomicstatusneighbourhoods,approximately1in3childrenexperiencedvisibledentaldecay.Thatis,thedataindicatedthat,onaverage,higherratesofvisibledentaldecayarenotoccurringexclusivelyinthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoods;theyaredistributedacrossvaryinglevelsofsocioeconomicstatus.
Thereisagrowingconsensusthatpublichealthinterventionsneedtocombinebothpopulation-basedandhigh-riskapproaches.117, 118, 119TheMarmotReviewrecommendsapolicyofproportionateuniversalisminwhich“actionsmustbeuniversal,butwithascaleandintensitythatisproportionatetothelevelsofdisadvantage.”120Itispossible,forexample,thatamulti-prongedcoordinatedapproachthatinvolvesacombinationofindividual-andcommunity-levelinterventionsmaybewellsuitedforthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedareas(withhighratesofdentaldecay),whereitisexpectedthatfamiliesencountermultiple,pervasivebarrierstoaccessingservices.However,interventionsthatsolelytarget‘atrisk’individualsorthemostdisadvantagedareasarenotsufficienttoaddressthesocialgradientindentalhealth,norwouldtheyaddressthemajorityofnewlesions.121, 122, 123
Itisimportanttonotethatthesocioeconomicdataavailableforanalysesofthekindergartendentalsurveydatareflectthesocioeconomicstatusoftheneighbourhood,onaverage,andwouldnotnecessarilyreflectthesocioeconomicbackgroundofeachindividualinthatneighbourhood.Recentstudiesindicatethatbothindividual-andneighbourhood-levelsocioeconomicfactorsmayindependentlyimpactindividualdentalhealth.124, 125, 126
117P.BatchelorandA.Sheiham,“Thelimitationsofa‘high-risk’approachforthepreventionofdentalcaries,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology30,no.4(2002):302-312.118StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,“Fairsociety,healthylives:TheMarmotreview.” 119Watt,“Fromvictimblamingtoupstreamaction:tacklingthesocialdeterminantsoforalhealthinequalities.” 120StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,“Fairsociety,healthylives:TheMarmotreview.”121BatchelorandSheiham,“Thelimitationsofa‘high-risk’approachforthepreventionofdentalcaries.” 122StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,“Fairsociety,healthylives:TheMarmotreview.”123Watt,“Fromvictimblamingtoupstreamaction:tacklingthesocialdeterminantsoforalhealthinequalities.”124J.Aidaetal.,“Contributionsofsocialcontexttoinequalityindentalcaries:amultilevelanalysisofJapanese3-year-oldchildren,”Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology36,no.2(2008):149-156.125Turrelletal.,“Theindependentcontributionofneighborhooddisadvantageandindividual-levelsocioeconomicpositiontoself-reportedoralhealth.”126Willemsetal.,“Theindependentimpactofhousehold-andneighborhood-basedsocialdeterminantsonearlychildhoodcaries.”
page50
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Drawing from population-level datasetsPopulation-baseddatacollectionthroughtheKindergartenDentalSurveyallowedforsimilaritiesanddifferencesindentalhealthoutcomesandratesofchangeovertimebyneighbourhoodtobeexamined.SurveillancethatinvolvedconsistentmeasurementofvisibledentaldecayacrossgeographiesandovertimewascriticalindevelopingabetterunderstandingoforalhealthtrendswithinBC.
Risk Assessment: Are the current dental health risk assessment/screen guidelines implemented as intended? Atthetimeofpublication,adiversityofriskassessmenttools,guidelinesandfollow-uptechniqueswerebeingusedacrosstheprovince.Creatingastandardizedtoolkitusingkeymessagingfoundintheliteratureandcurrentassessmenttoolscouldensureconsistentandcomprehensivemessaging.Standardizationoftoolsandconsistencyindatawouldallowhealthauthoritiestosharedatawithoneanotherandmakecomparisonsacrossavarietyofsettingstoinvestigatetheeffectivenessofintervention/preventionstrategies.Arigidstandardizationisnotrecommended,butinsteadtherecouldbestandardizedcomponentsoftheriskassessmenttoolsanddata,preferablythecomponentswhichwouldbeidentifiedascorefunctionsoftheriskassessments.DoingsowillallowhealthauthoritiesandHSDAsto:a)communicatewitheachotherandcomparedataonthesameelementswithoutneedfortranslation,andb)tailortheirservicestomeettheircommunities’uniqueneeds,ensuringthattheirprogramisthemostappropriatefitfortheculturalorsocialenvironment.
StandardizationalsoallowstheMinistryofHealth(MoH)toensurethateveryHSDAisup-to-datewithindustrystandards,asrevisionrolloutswouldbecentralizedandefficient.Assuch,thiswouldincreaseregionalhealthauthorities’andMoH’scapacityforservicedeliveryandprogramevaluation.Training,aswell,mayalsobeeasierwithstandardizedcomponents,astheMoH,partneredwithregionalhealthauthorities,maybeabletodeveloponecoretrainingmodulethatcouldbeaugmentedandtailoredforindividualhealthauthoritiesorHSDAsandtheirrespectivecommunities.127
Building partnerships: What strategies are used in the health authorities to prevent early childhood dental disease? Certaindemographicgroupsandchildrenresidingincertainareasoftheprovincehavebeenshowntobemorevulnerablefordevelopingearlychildhoodcaries.Anefficientandeffectivewaytoreachthesefamiliesistopartnerwithorganizationsthathavethosefamilieswithintheircatchment.Thevalueofcommunitypartnershipandpartnershipbuildingintersectorallyoracrossdisciplines(e.g.,publichealthnurse,familyphysician,dentalstaff)isconsistentwithcreationofacoordinatedsetofstrategiesthatcounteractsfragmentationandreflectsthenotionthatoralhealthproblemsdonotoccurinisolation.Apartnershipratherthandisease-specificapproachisindicativethatoralhealthproblemssharecommonriskfactors(relatedtodiet,hygiene,etc.)withotherchronicdiseasesthatarealsodisproportionatelyprevalentwithinmoredisadvantagedareas.
127P.Hawe,A.Shiell,andT.Riley,“Complexinterventions:how‘outofcontrol’canarandomisedcontrolledtrialbe?,”BritishMedicalJournal328,no.7455(2004):1561.
page51
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Buildingpartnershipswillallowpublichealthdentalstafftotailortheirprogramssothattheycanhavemaximumbenefitforthefamiliestheyaretryingtoreach.Itwillalsoallowdentalstafftoplanprogramsthatareresponsivetothecultureandetiquetteofthepopulationsresidingintheirrespectiveareas.Creatingsuchresponsiveprogrammingwillenablefamilies,whomayfeelalienatedordistrustfulofhealthcareproviders,tobuild/establishtrustwiththepublichealthsector.Additionally,publichealthdentalprogramscouldbecomeintegratedintothecommunitystructure.Workingwithcommunityorganizationsmayfacilitatedentalprogrammingthattakesintoconsiderationcommunityinputandpriorities,therebymakingdentalprogrammingmaximallysuitedandrelevanttocommunitymembers.
Furthermore,thegreatconsistencybetweenthereportedbarrierstoaccesstodentalprogramsandthoseassociatedwithfamiliesaccessingearlychildhoodprograms,moregenerally,suggestthatongoingdialogueandcollaborationwithstaffwithinearlychildhoodeducationprogramstodiscussfamilies’commonbarrierstoaccesscouldresultinacoordinatedsetofstrategiesthatpotentiallycouldhelpmorefamiliesreachservices.Itispossiblethatfamiliesfromallsocioeconomicbackgroundsmayencounterbarrierstoaccessingservices;forexample,timepovertymaybeabarriertoaccessingservicesrelevantforfamiliesacrosssocioeconomicbackgrounds.However,itisanticipatedthatfamiliesinthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedneighbourhoodswouldlikelyexperienceahighernumberofbarriersrelativetothosewhoaremoreadvantagedandthatthenumberofbarriersencounteredwoulddecreasewithincreasingadvantageinsocioeconomicstatus.
page52
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE EVALUATION PROCESS
StrengthsTheevaluationprocessemphasizedaparticipatorymethodology,andeachmilestoneoftheprojectwasfinalizedincollaborationwithrepresentativesfromhealthauthoritiesandtheMinistryofHealth.Byconductingtheevaluationissuchamanner,HELPwasabletoensurethecontinuedrelevanceoftheevaluationoutcomeswithregardstothechangingneedsofhealthauthoritiesandMinistryofHealth.Additionally,bydrawinguponbothqualitativeandquantitativemethods,HELPwasabletoproviderobustfindings.Thefocusgroupsandinterviewswereabletointegratein-depthknowledgepossessedbypublichealthdentalstaffthat,onaverage,had15years(therangewas0to38years)ofexperienceinthefield.TheKindergartenDentalSurveyhadextensivecoverage,wasatthepopulation-level,andenabledanalysisofchangeinkindergartenvisibledentaldecayratesovertime,owingtopublichealthstaff’sconsistentcodingandrecordingpracticesinboth2006/07and2009/10.
Severalancillaryandregionalprojectswerealsodevelopedinadditiontotheprovincialevaluationprocess,strengtheningtheevaluationoutcomes:
• Regionalreportsforthefivehealthauthorities,• ProvincialCariesRiskAssessment(CRA)tooldevelopment&validationtemplate;
• Additionalmaps,• IHATimeUseQuestionnaire,and• BCDAMemberSurvey.
Regional Evaluation Frameworks and Focus Group ReportsInadditiontotheprovincialevaluationquestions,eachhealthauthoritydevelopedtwotothreeregionally-definedevaluationquestionswhichtargetedspecificissuesrelevanttotheirhealthauthority.Thesequestionswereincorporatedintothefocusgroupguidesandqualitativeanalysis,andabriefreportwasdevelopedforeachregion.Acopyofeachreportwasprovidedtotherespectivehealthauthority.Thetopic-areasofregionallydefinedquestionswerecomplimentarytotheprovinciallydefinedquestions,andcenteredonsuchissuesasprogramreach,outcometrends,comparisonsacrossHSDAs,andsuggestionsforprogramimprovement.
Provincial Caries Risk Assessment (CRA) Tool Development & Validation TemplateIn2007,theDentalEvaluationCommitteedecidedtodevelopastandardizedprovincialcariesriskassessmenttool.LeadinguptoMarch2008,HELPdevelopedapreliminarydraftofascreeningtool,called,“BabyToothCheck-up.”Thedevelopmentofthis5-itemprovincialCRAtoolwasinformedbyareviewoftheliterature,best-practicesbothwithinandoutsideBC,consultationswithpublichealthdentalstaff,andrecommendationsfromtheBCEarlyChildhoodDentalProgramEvaluationSubcommittee.Thefivequestionscovertopicssuchasaccesstooralhealthcare,theestablishmentofa“dentalhome,”familyhistoryofdentaldecay,oralhealthcarepractices,andnutrition.ACRAvalidationmeetingwasplannedtoestablishconsensusaroundtheindicatorstobeincludedinaprovincialCRAtool,aswellastheguidelinesandfollow-upproceduresforuseprovince-wide.This
page53
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
validationprocesswasdiscontinuedinordertoevaluatetheexistingriskassessmentprocedures.However,thematerialsdevelopedremainavailableforfutureprogramplanning.TheCRAtooldevelopmentandvalidationmaterialsinclude:CRAToolkitDevelopmentQuestionnaire(toobtaininputoncontent,proceduresandguidelines),CRAIndicatorAppraisalQuestionnaire(toassessselecteditemsintermsoffeasibility,programvalue,evidence-base,andappropriatenessforadiversityofstaffandclients).
Additional MapsHELPsmappingteamproducedthreemapsbeyondtheoriginalevaluationplan,tobetterunderstandthecontextofearlychildhoodoralhealthinBC:
• DrivingDistancetoaDentistinBC• DistributionsofDentistsinBC• DentistLocationsMap(Interactivemapincludingdistributionofdentists,anddrivingdistancetoadentistinBC)
• InteractiveHealthAuthorityMaps,foreachofthefivehealthauthorities
IHA Time-Use Questionnaire and Literature ReviewATime-UseQuestionnairewasdeveloped,distributed,collected,andanalyzedfortheInteriorHealthAuthority,inreferencetooneoftheirregionallydefinedquestionontheweightingofone-on-oneversusgroup-levelservices.Thequestionnairewasconductedin2008/09,andwasfocusedonassessingtherelativeamountsofstaff-timedevotedtoindividual-levelversusgroup-levelservices.Thirteen(outoftheeighteen)IHAdentalstaffparticipatedinthisquestionnairebyansweringquestionsabouttheirtime-useoverthepreviousthreemonthperiod.TheresultsindicatethatIHAdentalstaffspend29%oftheirweeklyhoursonone-on-oneservicedelivery(e.g.,riskassessment),19%ongroup-levelservicedelivery(e.g.,educationsessionsincommunitysites),7%onsurveillance,24%onadministration,7%ontravel,14%onotheractivities,suchasemailcorrespondence.
BCDA Member SurveyIn2009,369generalpracticedentistsparticipatedinaBCDentalAssociationmembersurvey,128representingapproximately13%ofthe2938generalpracticedentistsinBC.129Thissurveyindicatedthat86%ofthedentistsinBCareawareoftherecommendationthatachild’sfirstdentalvisitshouldoccurnomorethansixmonthsaftertheeruptionofthechild’sfirsttooth,orapproximatelyattheageofoneyear-old.Only75%ofBCdentists,however,reportthattheyexaminechildrenundertheageof2years-old.Forthosedentistswhodonotexaminechildrenundertwo,abouthalfofthemreportedthatthisisdueto“PatientManagementDifficulties.”“PatientManagementDifficulties,”mayincludetimemanagementproblems,anddifficultiesgainingthetrustofthechildandcaregiver.Additionally,only36dentists(1%)specializeinpediatricdentistry,andlessthan5%(158)areemployedinrural-designatedpostalcodeareas.QuestionnaireitemsweredevelopedforinclusioninthissurveyinordertoaddressaVCH-definedregionalevaluationquestionregardingdentalvisitsforchildrenunder12months-old.
128CherylLandrigan,Personalcommunication,July29,2009.129BCCollegeofDentalSurgeons.
page54
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
LimitationsOnelimitationisthattheecologicalanalysesconducted(i.e.,theoverlayofvisibledentaldatawithsocioeconomicdata)provideacharacterizationofsocioeconomicstatusofneighbourhoods,onaverage;however,theneighbourhood-levelsocioeconomicdatadonotreflectthesocioeconomicbackgroundsofallindividualsresidinginthatneighbourhood.Generalpatternscanbeacquiredthroughthesetypesofanalyses,butmoreprecisemeasurementofchildren’ssocioeconomicanddentalhealthtrajectoriesovertimewouldrequireperiodicandongoingcollectionandanalysisofaggregatedindividual-levelsocioeconomicinformationcombinedwithindividual-levelvisibledentaldecayresults.
Also,thereweretwoadditionaldatasourcesthatwereoriginallyintendedtobeincludedintheanalysis:1)electronicchildhealthrecordsfromiPHIS(thePublicHealthInformationSystem),and2)focusgroupswithparentsandcommunitypartners.
Electronic child health records of preventive services received ThedevelopmentoftheEvaluationFrameworkincludedconfirmationofasetofminimumiPHISdataelementstoprovideinformationonpreventiveservicesreceived(cariesriskassessmentandfluoridevarnish),identifiedrisk-levels,andKindergartenDentalSurveyoutcomes.TheelectronicdatasetfromiPHISwasnotavailableforanalysisduetounforeseendelaysinestablishinganInformationSharingAgreement.Assuch,HELPwasnotabletodefinitivelyrespondtoevaluationquestionsaboutthecoverageoreffectivenessofpreventiveservices.
Focus groups with parents/caregivers and community partners Thesecondkeydatasourcewhichwasnotfeasibletoobtainwithintheallottedtimeframewasthatoffocusgroupdatafromparentsandcommunitypartners.Thesefocusgroupswereoriginallydesignedtoaddressevaluationquestion#3,regardinghealthpromotioninterventionsforsupportinghealthyfamilydentalpractices.
page55
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
RECOMMENDATIONS
Basedonthefindingsdescribedinthisreport,weputforthfourbroadrecommendationsforconsideration.Therecommendationsrelatetosurveillance,cariesriskassessment,programandserviceplanning,andpartnershipbuilding.
1. SurveillanceKindergarten dental survey and risk assessmentsDetermineongoingprogramdataneedstosupportsurveillanceandprogrammonitoringataprovincialandhealthauthoritylevel.Forexample,considerincorporatingcariesriskassessmentintoacoordinatedandintegratedmodeloflongitudinaldevelopmentalsurveillancethatincludescollectingandrecordingdataat12monthsofageandatkindergarten.
Recommendation 1a: ContinuetoimplementtheKindergartenDentalSurvey,usingconsistentcodingandrecordingpractices,everythreeyears(e.g.,2012/13,2015/16,etc.)tocontinuetomonitorthestateofearlychildoralhealthinBC.Trendsinvisibledentaldecaywouldbecomemorereadilyapparentaftermultipledatapointshavebeencollected.
Recommendation 1b:Utilizethedatafromthesurveystointensifypreventioninterventionsinthoseneighbourhoodsthatareidentifiedwithaconsistentlyhighincidenceofvisibledentaldecayandthosewithvisibledecayratesconsistentlyworsethanexpected(i.e.,persistentoff–diagonalneighbourhoods).Consistentdocumentationandrecordingofinformationabouttheinterventionsandpopulationsserved,aswellastheoutcomesoftheseinterventionswouldstrengthenthecapacity,bothprovinciallyandregionally,tounderstandthetypesoffactorsthatmayinfluencedifferentialratesofdecayacrossBCneighbourhoods.
2. Standardized tool developmentCaries Risk Assessment GuidelinesConsiderdevelopingProvincialCariesRiskAssessmentGuidelinesto:
• Standardizeassessmentandfollow-upprocesses(e.g.,riskfactorsassessed,timeframeforfollow-up,numberofcontactattempts,personalizedcontactmethods).
• Supportconsistentriskclassificationanddatacollection.• Standardizemessagingandresourcedevelopment(e.g.oralhealth-relatedhandouts)tofocusonconciseandconsistentcommunicationofkeyoralhealthmessagestocaregivers.
• Reinforceandexpandbestpractices(e.g.,communitypartnership,personalizedservices).
Note:Thetoolsdonotnecessarilyneedtobeexactlythesame,butstandardizedriskclassificationandresourcesshouldbedeveloped.HealthAuthoritiesarealsoencouragedtocontinueusing/developingadditionalandsupplementarytoolsthatuniquelyreflecttheirindividualregions.SeethefindingssectionforEvaluationQuestion2formoredetailedrecommendationsaboutstandardizedassessmentandfollow-upguidelines.
page56
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
3. Program and service planning
Consider planning programs and services that are proportionate to reported rates of dental decay and level of socioeconomic disadvantage.Theresultsoftheanalysisofthe2006/07and2009/10KindergartenDentalSurveydatasetsindicatetheneedforpopulation-basedapproachesthataddresstheincidenceofvisibledentaldecayacrossBCneighbourhoodsofvaryingsocioeconomicstatus.Itisrecommendedtosupplementapopulation-basedapproachwithactionsthatdirectservicesinthoseneighbourhoodswithmoderateandmoderatelylowsocioeconomicstatus,aswellasprioritizeandintensifyinterventionsinthemostsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedareaswithconsistentlyhighratesofvisibledecay.Thelevel,individual-orcommunity-based,or‘intensity’ofservicescouldbetailoreddependingonthereportedratesofvisibledentaldecayandneighbourhoodsocioeconomicstatus.
4. Provincially coordinated strategies to support community-level partnerships
Community partnership initiatives for confirmed populations of concernConsiderdevelopingprovinciallycoordinatedstrategiestocollaboratewithnewandexistingcommunityorganizationsandearlylearningcentersto:• Increaseprogramreachtovulnerablepopulationsandfamilieswhomaynottypicallyaccesspublichealthservices,especiallyincommunitieswhereimmunizationsoccurprimarilyoutsidepublichealth.
Inpolicydocumentsandstrategicplans,considerincludingstatementstosupportongoingcommunityoutreachwithconfirmedpopulationsofconcernforwhomdentalprogramsshouldbespecificallytailored.Thiscouldincludeworkingwithcommunitypartnerstopromotehealthyearlychildhoodsettings(e.g.,providinghealthysnacks,educationonhealthyfeedingpractices).Fromthisevaluationproject,severalpopulationgroupshavebeenconfirmed:familieswithlowincome,familiesresidinginruralorremotelocations,recentimmigrantfamilies,familiesofAboriginaldescent,lone-parentfamilies,andthosewithspecialneeds.ThesegroupscoincidewiththepopulationsofconcernidentifiedintheCoreFunctionsforPublicHealthinBC(pleaseseethecompanionFocusGroupsProvincialAnalysisreportforspecificsuggestionsaboutnewcommunitypartnershipinitiatives).
Cultural safety trainingConsidermakingculturalsafetytrainingavailabletoalldentalstaff,particularlywithrespecttoworkingwithImmigrantandAboriginalcommunitiesandfamilies.Byofferingculturalsafetytraining,targetpopulationswhomayotherwiseavoidpublichealthfacilitiesduetofearormistrust,canbegintofeelsafewithinpublichealthservices.ThisrecommendationiscommensuratewiththeCanadianOralHealthStrategyrecommendationsforimprovingsocial/culturalaccesswhichstatesthatservicesshouldbeprovidedwherefamilies“canfeelateasefromacultural,socialandlinguisticpointofview.”Makingculturalsafetytrainingavailablecanhelpdentalstafftobeginearningthetrustofalienatedpopulations,thuspotentiallymakinganycommunityoutreachinitiativesmoreeffective.Culturalsafetytrainingayalsobenecessitatedatthemanagementlevelsoastounderstandanddismantlediscriminatorypolicies.
page57
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Public Health PartnershipConsiderdevelopingprovinciallycoordinatedstrategiestocollaboratewithorintegratedentalhealthintoexistingearlychildhoodpublichealthprograms.Partnershipsacrosspublichealthprogramsanddisciplinesthatsharecommonprioritiesandobjectives,suchasdentalhealthandnutrition,couldbeestablishedorfurtherdeveloped.130Also,PublicHealthNursescouldcommunicatekeydentalhealthmessagestofamiliesatearlypointsofcontact,particularlyatChildHealthClinicsfor2,4,6,12,and18monthsofage.Giventhatapproximatelytwo-thirdsofBC’schildrenunderagetwoyearsareup-to-dateintheirimmunizations,itisrecommendedthatdentalpublichealthcontinuetodevelopcoordinatedprimordialandprimarypreventionstrategiesthatcoincidewithchildren’simmunizationappointments.
Primary Care ProvidersConsiderdevelopingprovinciallycoordinatedstrategiestocollaboratewithprimarycareproviderswhodeliverimmunizationstoensuredentalhealthmessagingisdeliveredasapartofthevisit.Allmedicalprofessionalscaringforchildrenneedgeneralknowledgeabouttheriskfactorsfordentaldisease,maternaloralhealth,oralhygienepractices,andfluorides.131Coordinatedcarecanfacilitatereferrals,preventionoforaldiseaseandhealthpromotion,andearlyidentificationofdentaldisease.Inparticular,theconfirmedpopulationsofconcernbenefitfromateamapproachtohealthcare.
Federal Program Service ProvidersConsiderdevelopingprovinciallycoordinatedstrategiestocollaboratewithfederalprogramserviceproviderssuchastheChildren’sOralHealthInitiative(COHI),HealthCanada’sMaternalandChildHealthprogram,andFirstNationsandInuitHealth.Thiscouldincludetheplanningofcoordinatedservicesandconsistentpreventionmessages.
130J.Leeetal.,“EffectsofWICparticipationonchildren’suseoforalhealthservices,”American Journal of Public Health94,no.5(2004):772.131MouradianandMaier,“Thetotalhealthteam:Workingtogethertoimprovechildren’shealth.”
page58
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
REFERENCESAboriginalHealthCouncilofWesternAustralia.DeliveryofaCulturalSafetyTrainingPilot
Program:FinalReporttoTheRoyalAustralianCollegeofGeneralPractitioners.Perth,WesternAustralia:AboriginalHealthCouncilofWesternAustralia,2005.
Aida,J.,Y.Ando,M.Oosaka,K.Niimi,andM.Morita.“Contributionsofsocialcontexttoinequalityindentalcaries:amultilevelanalysisofJapanese3-year-oldchildren.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology36,no.2(2008):149-156.
AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistryCouncilonClinicalAffairs.“Policyonuseofacaries-riskassessmenttool(CAT)forinfants,children,andadolescents.”PediatrDent29,no.7(2006):25-7.
AmericanAcademyofPediatricDentistry.“Oralhealthpolicies.”PediatricDentistry26,no.7(2004):16-61.
Andersen,Ronald.ChangingtheUShealthcaresystem:Keyissuesinhealthservices,policy,andmanagement.2nded.SanFranciscoCalif.:Jossey-Bass,2001.
Anderson,J.,J.APerry,C.Blue,A.Browne,A.Henderson,K.BKhan,S.RKirkham,J.Lynam,P.Semeniuk,andV.Smye.“‘Rewriting’culturalsafetywithinthepostcolonialandpostnationalfeministproject:Towardnewepistemologiesofhealing.”AdvancesinNursingScience26,no.3(2003):196.
Antunes,J.L.F.,P.Frazao,P.C.Narvai,C.M.Bispo,andT.Pegoretti.“Spatialanalysistoidentifydifferentialsindentalneedsbyarea-basedmeasures.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology30,no.2(2002):133-142.
Armfield,J.M.“Socioeconomicinequalitiesinchildoralhealth:Acomparisonofdiscreteandcompositearea-basedmeasures.”JournalofPublicHealthDentistry67,no.2(2007):119-125.
AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors.Basicscreeningsurveys:Anapproachtomonitoringcommunityoralhealth.Sparks,NV:AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,1999.
———.ResearchBrief:FluorideVarnish:anEvidence-BasedApproach.Sparks,NV:AssociationofStateandTerritorialDentalDirectors,2007.
Astrom,A.N.,O.Haugejorden,E.Skaret,T.A.Trovik,andK.S.Klock.“OralimpactsondailyperformanceinNorwegianadults:theinfluenceofage,numberofmissingteeth,andsocio-demographicfactors.”EuropeanJournalofOralSciences114,no.2(2006):115-121.
Azarpazhooh,A.,andP.A.Main.“Fluoridevarnishinthepreventionofdentalcariesinchildrenandadolescents:asystematicreview.”J.CantDent.Assoc.74,no.1(2008):73-79.
Ballantyne-MacRitchie,Heather.“ApartnershipbetweenhealthvisitorsanddentiststoidentifyhighcariesriskScottishpre-schoolchildren”.PhDThesis,UniversityofDundee,2000.
Batchelor,P.,andA.Sheiham.“Thelimitationsofa‘high-risk’approachforthepreventionofdentalcaries.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology30,no.4(2002):302-312.
BCAboriginalChildCareSociety.BCAboriginalChildCareSocietyRespondstoMinistryofEducationDraftEarlyLearningFramework.Vancouver,BC:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2007.
———.HandbookofBestPracticesinAboriginalEarlyChildhoodPrograms,2003.Vancouver,BC:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2003.
BCCentreforDiseaseControl.ImmunizationinBritishColumbia,2006-2007.Vancouver,BC:BCCentreforDiseaseControl,2009.
BCMinistryofHealth.BritishColumbia’sSchoolScreeningDentalProgram,ARegionalandProvincialAnalysis.Victoria,BC:BCMinistryofHealth,2003.
———.Evidencereview:Dentalpublichealth.Victoria,BC:BCMinistryofHealth,2006.http://www.vch.ca/media/Evidence_Review_Dental.pdf.
BCMinistryofHealthServices.DentalSurveyofAboriginalKindergarten-AgedChildren2009-2010:AProvincialandFirstNationsSchoolAnalysis.Victoria,BC:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealthandServices,2011.
BCMinistryofHealth.TheEvidenceBaseforPreventiveStrategiesinDentalPublicHealth.EvidenceReview.Victoria,BC:BCMinistryofHealth,2006.
page59
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Beltrán-Aguilar,E.,D.M.Malvitz,S.A.Lockwood,R.G.Rozier,andS.L.Tomar.“Oralhealthsurveillance:Past,present,andfuturechallenges.”JournalofPublicHealthDentistry63,no.3(2003):141-149.
Beltrán-Aguilar,E.D.,D.M.Malvitz,andS.A.Eklund.“Validityoftwomethodsforassessingoralhealthstatusofpopulations.”JournalofPublicHealthDentistry57,no.4(1997):206-214.
Berg,JoelH.,andRebeccaL.Slayton,eds.Earlychildhoodoralhealth.Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
Berkowitz,R.J.“Causes,treatmentandpreventionofearlychildhoodcaries:Amicrobiologicperspective.”JournaloftheCanadianDentalAssociation69,no.5(2003):304-307.
Blair,Y,L.M.D.Macpherson,D.R.McCall,A.D.McMahon,andK.W.Stephen.“Glasgownursery-basedcariesexperience,beforeandafteracommunitydevelopment-basedoralhealthprogramme’simplementation.”CommunityDentalHealth21,no.4(2004):291-298.
BritishColumbiaDentalPublicHealthCommittee.DentalScreeningManual,2006.CanadianAssociationofPediatricHealthCentres.“EarlyChildhoodCaries:AnEpidemicand
PandemicinNorthAmerica”,2007.http://www.caphc.org/documents_annual/2007/conference_ppts/16_10_2007/cc1/k_morley.pdf.
Christensen,Mathew.Coloradooralhealthsurvey2006-2007schoolyear:Preliminaryresults.Denver,CO:ColoradoDepartmentofPublicHealthandEnvironment,2007.
ConnecticutDepartmentofPublicHealth.Everysmilecounts:theoralhealthofConnecticut’schildren.Hartford,CT,2007.
Cote,S.,P.Geltman,M.Nunn,K.Lituri,M.Henshaw,andR.I.Garcia.“DentalcariesofrefugeechildrencomparedwithUSChildren.”Pediatrics114,no.6(2004):e733-740.
Crall,JamesJ.“Rethinkingprevention.”PediatricDentistry28,no.2(2006):96-101;discussion192-198.
Davies,G.M.,H.V.Worthington,R.P.Ellwood,E.M.Bentley,A.S.Blinkhorn,G.O.Taylor,andR.M.Davies.“Arandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofprovidingfreefluoridetoothpastefromtheageof12monthsonreducingcariesin5-6yearoldchildren.”CommunityDent.Health19,no.3(2002):131-136.
DentalHealthFoundation.“Mommy,ithurtstochew.”TheCaliforniaSmileSurvey:AnoralhealthassessmentofCalifornia’skindergartenand3rdgradechildren.Oakland,CA,2006.
DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices.OralHealthinAmerica:AReportoftheSurgeonGeneral.Rockville,MD:DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,NationalInstituteofDentalandCraniofacialResearch,NationalInstitutesofHealth,2000.
Do,L.G.,A.J.Spencer,G.D.Slade,D.H.Ha,K.F.Roberts-Thomson,andP.Liu.“Trendofincome-relatedinequalityofchildoralhealthinAustralia.”JournalofDentalResearch89,no.9(2010):959-964.
Donaldson,A.N.,B.Everitt,T.Newton,J.Steele,M.Sherriff,andE.Bower.“Theeffectsofsocialclassanddentalattendanceonoralhealth.”JournalofDentalResearch87,no.1(2008):60-64.
Dye,B.A.,C.M.Vargas,J.J.Lee,L.Magder,andN.Tinanoff.“Assessingtherelationshipbetweenchildren’soralhealthstatusandthatoftheirmothers.”JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation(1939)142,no.2(2011):173-183.
Federal,ProvincialandTerritorialDentalDirectors.ACanadianoralhealthstrategy.TheFederal,Provincial,TerritorialDentalDirectorsGroup,2005.http://www.fptdwg.ca/assets/PDF/Canadian%20Oral%20Health%20Strategy%20-%20Final.pdf.
Feitosa,S.,V.Colares,andJ.Pinkham.“Thepsychosocialeffectsofseverecariesin4-year-oldchildreninRecife,Pernambuco,Brazil.”Cad.SaudePublica21,no.5(2005):1550-1556.
Filstrup,S.L,D.Briskie,M.DaFonseca,L.Lawrence,A.Wandera,andM.R.Inglehart.“Earlychildhoodcariesandqualityoflife:Childandparentperspectives.”Pediatricdentistry25,no.5(2003):431–440.
FosterPage,L.A.,W.M.Thomson,A.Jokovic,andD.Locker.“ValidationoftheChildPerceptionsQuestionnaire(CPQ11-14).”JournalofDentalResearch84,no.7(2005):649-652.
Gao,X.-L.,C.-Y.S.Hsu,Y.C.Xu,T.Loh,D.Koh,andH.B.Hwarng.“Behavioralpathwaysexplainingoralhealthdisparityinchildren.”JournalofDentalResearch89,no.9(2010):985-990.
page60
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Gehlert,S.,D.Sohmer,T.Sacks,C.Mininger,M.McClintock,andO.Olopade.“Targetinghealthdisparities:Amodellinkingupstreamdeterminantstodownstreaminterventions.”HealthAffairs27,no.2(2008):339-349.
Gerlach,Alison.StepsintheRightDirection:Connecting&CollaboratinginEarlyInterventionTherapywithAboriginalFamilies&CommunitiesinBritishColumbia.1sted.Vancouver,B.C.:BCAboriginalChildCareSociety,2007.
Gomez,S.S.,C-G.Emilson,A.A.Weber,andS.Uribe.“Prolongedeffectofamother–childcariespreventiveprogramondentalcariesinthepermanent1stmolarsin9to10-year-oldchildren.”ActaOdontologicaScandinavica65,no.5(2007):271-274.
Gomez,S.S.,A.A.Weber,andC.G.Emilson.“Aprospectivestudyofacariespreventionprograminpregnantwomenandtheirchildrenfiveandsixyearsofage.”ASDCJournalofDentistryforChildren68,no.3(2001):191-195,152.
Grindefjord,M.,G.Dahllöf,B.Nilsson,andT.Modéer.“Predictionofdentalcariesdevelopmentin1-year-oldchildren.”CariesResearch29,no.5(1995):343-348.
Hart-Wasekeesikaw,F.,D.Gregory,andM.Hart.CulturalCompetenceandCulturalSafetyinFirstNations,InuitandMétisNursingEducation:AnIntegratedReviewoftheLiterature.Ottawa,ON:AboriginalNursesAssociationofCanada,2009.
Hawe,P.,A.Shiell,andT.Riley.“Complexinterventions:how‘outofcontrol’canarandomisedcontrolledtrialbe?”BritishMedicalJournal328,no.7455(2004):1561.
HumanEarlyLearningPartnershipEvaluationTeam.BCEarlyChildhoodVisionScreeningProgram:EvaluationFrameworkOverview.Vancouver,BC:UniversityofBritishColumbia,2009.
Ismail,A.,andW.Sohn.“Theimpactofuniversalaccesstodentalcareondisparitiesincariesexperienceinchildren.”JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation132,no.3(2001):295-303.
Isokangas,P.,E.Soderling,K.Pienihakkinen,andP.Alanen.“Occurrenceofdentaldecayinchildrenaftermaternalconsumptionofxylitolchewinggum,afollow-upfrom0to5yearsofage.”JournalofDentalResearch79,no.11(2000):1885-1889.
Jacobson,V.J.,andP.Szilagyi.“Patientreminderandpatientrecallsystemstoimproveimmunizationrates.”CochraneDatabaseofSystematicReviews(Online),no.3(2005):CD003941.
Janus,M.,S.Brinkman,E.Duke,C.Hertzman,R.Santos,M.Sayers,S.Joanne,andC.Walsh.TheEarlyDevelopmentInstrument:population-basedmeasureforcommunities:ahandbookondevelopment,propertiesanduse.Hamilton,Ont.:OffordCentreforChildStudies,2007.
Jones,C.M.,andH.Worthington.“Fluoridation:Therelationshipbetweenwaterfluoridationandsocioeconomicdeprivationontoothdecayin5-year-oldchildren.”BrDentJ186,no.8(1999):397-400.
Jones,C.M.,G.O.Taylor,J.G.Whittle,D.Evans,andD.P.Trotter.“Waterfluoridation,toothdecayin5yearolds,andsocialdeprivationmeasuredbytheJarmanscore:AnalysisofdatafromBritishdentalsurveys.”BMJ315,no.7107(1997):514-517.
Jones,C.M.,N.Tinanoff,B.L.Edelstein,D.A.Schneider,B.DeBerry-Sumner,M.B.Kanda,R.J.Brocato,D.Blum-Kemelor,andP.Mitchell.“Creatingpartnershipsforimprovingoralhealthoflow-incomechildren.”JournalofPublicHealthDentistry60,no.3(2000):193-196.
Kay,E.,andD.Locker.“Asystematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofhealthpromotionaimedatimprovingoralhealth.”CommunityDentalHealth15,no.3(1998):132-144.
———.“Isdentalhealtheducationeffective?Asystematicreviewofcurrentevidence.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology24,no.4(1996):231-235.
Kelly,S.E.,C.J.Binkley,W.P.Neace,andB.S.Gale.“BarrierstoCare-SeekingforChildren’sOralHealthAmongLow-IncomeCaregivers.”AmJPublicHealth95,no.8(2005):1345-1351.
Kershaw,P.W.,L.Irwin,K.Trafford,andC.Hertzman.“TheBritishColumbiaAtlasofChildDevelopment.”CanadianWesternGeographicalSeries40(2005):1203-1178.
Lapirattanakul,J.,K.Nakano,R.Nomura,S.Hamada,I.Nakagawa,andT.Ooshima.“Demonstrationofmother-to-childtransmissionofstreptococcusmutansusingmultilocussequencetyping.”CariesResearch42,no.6(2008):466-474.
Lee,J.,G.Rozier,E.Norton,J.Kotch,andW.VannJr.“EffectsofWICparticipationonchildren’suseoforalhealthservices.”AmericanJournalofPublicHealth94,no.5(2004):772.
page61
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Lee,JessicaY.“Chapter10:Communityprogramsandoralhealth.”InEarlyChildhoodOralHealth,editedbyJoelH.BergandRebeccaL.Slayton,223-236.Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
Levin,K.A.,C.A.Davies,G.V.A.Topping,A.V.Assaf,andN.B.Pitts.“Inequalitiesindentalcariesof5-year-oldchildreninScotland,1993–2003.”TheEuropeanJournalofPublicHealth19,no.3(2009):337-342.
Locker,D.“Disparitiesinoralhealth-relatedqualityoflifeinapopulationofCanadianchildren.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology35,no.5(2007):348-356.
Lukes,S.M.,S.Wadhawan,andL.N.Lampiris.“HealthySmilesHealthyGrowth2004-BasicScreeningSurveyofmigrantandseasonalfarmworkerchildreninIllinois.”JournalofPublicHealthDentistry66,no.3(2006):216-218.
Lundy,KarenSaucier,andSharynJanes.Communityhealthnursing:Caringforthepublic’shealth.Sudbury,MA:Jones&Bartlett,2009.
Meyer,K.,W.Geurtsen,andH.Günay.“Anearlyoralhealthcareprogramstartingduringpregnancy.”ClinicalOralInvestigations14,no.3(2009):257-264.
Mouradian,Wendy,andRussellMaier.“Thetotalhealthteam:Workingtogethertoimprovechildren’shealth.”InEarlyChildhoodOralHealth,237-261.Iowa:JohnWileyandSons,2009.
NationalAboriginalHealthOrganization.CulturalCompetencyandSafety:AGuideforHealthCareAdministrators,ProvidersandEducators.NationalAboriginalHealthOrganization,2008.
Nuttall,N.M.,D.G.Steele,D.Evans,B.Chadwick,A.J.Morris,andK.Hill.“ThereportedimpactoforalconditiononchildrenintheUnitedKingdom,2003.”BrDentJ200,no.10(2006):551-556.
Owen,J.ProgramEvaluation:FormsandApproaches.NewYork,NY:GuilfordPress,2006.Pallan,P.,L.Siebold,andM.Hollander.ModelCoreProgramPaperforDentalPublicHealth.
Victoria,BC:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealth,2006.PartnershipforthePublic’sHealth(ProgramOffice).StrategiesforBuildingCommunity-PublicHealth
Partnerships.California,US,2007.Patel,R.R.,R.Tootla,andM.R.Inglehart.“Doesoralhealthaffectselfperceptions,parental
ratingsandvideo-basedassessmentsofchildren’ssmiles?”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology35,no.1(2007):44-52.
Patrick,D.L.,R.S.Y.Lee,M.Nucci,D.Grembowski,C.Z.Jolles,andP.Milgrom.“ReducingOralHealthDisparities:AFocusonSocialandCulturalDeterminants.”BMCOralHealth6,no.1(2006):S4-S4.
Patton,Michael.Utilization-focusedevaluation.4thed.ThousandOaksCalif.:SagePublications,2008.
Peressini,S.,J.L.Leake,J.T.Mayhall,M.Maar,andR.Trudeau.“Prevalenceofdentalcariesamong7-and13-year-oldFirstNationschildren,DistrictofManitoulin,Ontario.”J.Can.Dent.Assoc.70,no.6(2004):382.
Pickett,K.E.,andM.Pearl.“Multilevelanalysesofneighbourhoodsocioeconomiccontextandhealthoutcomes:acriticalreview.”JournalofEpidemiologyandCommunityHealth55,no.2(2001):111-122.
Plutzer,K.,andA.J.Spencer.“Efficacyofanoralhealthpromotioninterventioninthepreventionofearlychildhoodcaries.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology36,no.4(2008):335-346.
Polaschek,N.R.“Culturalsafety:anewconceptinnursingpeopleofdifferentethnicities.”JournalofAdvancedNursing27,no.3(1998):452-457.
Quiñonez,Rocio,JamesJ.Crall,JoelH.Berg,andRebeccaL.Slayton.“Chapter8:Caries-riskassessment.”InEarlychildhoodoralhealth,170-197.Ames,Iowa:Wiley-Blackwell,2009.
Ramos-Gomez,F.,S.Gansky,andJ.Featherstone.“CariesRiskAssessmentAppropriatefortheAge1Visit(InfantsandToddlers).”CanadianDentalAssociationJournal35,no.10(2007):687-702.
Rodewald,L.E.,P.G.Szilagyi,S.G.Humiston,R.Barth,R.Kraus,andR.F.Raubertas.“Arandomizedstudyoftrackingwithoutreachandproviderpromptingtoimproveimmunizationcoverageandprimarycare.”Pediatrics103,no.1(1999):31-38.
page62
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Rodrigues,C.S.,andA.Sheiham.“Therelationshipsbetweendietaryguidelines,sugarintakeandcariesinprimaryteethinlowincomeBrazilian3-year-olds:alongitudinalstudy.”InternationalJournalofPaediatricDentistry10,no.1(2000):47-55.
Sabbah,W.,G.Tsakos,A.Sheiham,andR.G.Watt.“Theroleofhealth-relatedbehaviorsinthesocioeconomicdisparitiesinoralhealth.”SocialScience&Medicine68,no.2(2009):298-303.
Saemundsson,S.R.,G.D.Slade,A.J.Spencer,andM.J.Davies.“Thebasisforclinicians’cariesriskgroupinginchildren.”PediatricDentistry19,no.5(1997):331-338.
Sanders,A.E.,A.J.Spencer,andG.D.Slade.“Evaluatingtheroleofdentalbehaviourinoralhealthinequalities.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology34,no.1(2006):71-79.
Schroeder,J.,J.Harvey,N.Razaz-Rahmati,G.Corless,J.Negreiros,L.Ford,P.Kershaw,etal.CreatingCommunitiesforYoungChildren:AToolkitforChange.Vancouver,BC:HumanEarlyLearningPartnership,2009.
ScottishExecutive.Nursingforhealth:areviewofthecontributionofnurses,midwivesandhealthvisitorstoimprovingthepublic’shealthinScotland.Edinburgh:TheStationeryOffice,2001.
ScottishIntercollegiateGuidelinesNetwork.Preventionandmanagementofdentaldecayinthepre-schoolchild:Anationalclinicalguideline.Edinburgh:NationalHealthServicesQualityImprovementScotland,2005.
Sprod,AndrewJ.,RobertAnderson,andElizabethT.Treasure.Effectiveoralhealthpromotion:literaturereview.Technicalreports20.Cardiff:HealthPromotionWales,1996.
StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010.“Fairsociety,healthylives:TheMarmotreview”.StrategicReviewofHealthInequalitiesinEnglandpost-2010,2010.
Tellez,M.,W.Sohn,B.ABurt,andA.IIsmail.“Assessmentoftherelationshipbetweenneighborhoodcharacteristicsanddentalcariesseverityamonglow-incomeAfrican-Americans:Amultilevelapproach.”Journalofpublichealthdentistry66,no.1(2006):30–36.
Turrell,G.,A.E.Sanders,G.D.Slade,A.J.Spencer,andW.Marcenes.“Theindependentcontributionofneighborhooddisadvantageandindividual-levelsocioeconomicpositiontoself-reportedoralhealth:amultilevelanalysis.”CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology35,no.3(2007):195-206.
UNICEFCanada.“Aboriginalchildren’shealth:Leavingnochildbehind”.CanadianUNICEFCommittee,2009.
Vargas,C.M.,J.J.Crall,andD.A.Schneider.“Sociodemographicdistributionofpediatricdentalcaries:NHANESIII,1988-1994.”J.Am.Dent.Assoc.129,no.9(1998):1229-1238.
Wandera,A.,S.Bhakta,andT.Barker.“Cariespredictionandindicatorsusingapediatricriskassessmentteachingtool.”ASDCJournalofDentistryforChildren67,no.6(2000):408-412,375.
Watt,R.G.“Fromvictimblamingtoupstreamaction:tacklingthesocialdeterminantsoforalhealthinequalities.”CommunityDent.OralEpidemiol.35,no.1(2007):1-11.
Wendt,L.K.,A.L.Hallonsten,andG.Koch.“Oralhealthinpre-schoolchildrenlivinginSweden.PartIII--Alongitudinalstudy.Riskanalysesbasedoncariesprevalenceat3yearsofageandimmigrantstatus.”SwedishDentalJournal23,no.1(1999):17-25.
Willems,S.,J.Vanobbergen,L.Martens,andJ.DeMaeseneer.“Theindependentimpactofhousehold-andneighborhood-basedsocialdeterminantsonearlychildhoodcaries:across-sectionalstudyofinner-citychildren.”Family&CommunityHealth28,no.2(2005):168.
Yusuf,H.,S.Gherunpong,A.Sheiham,andG.Tsakos.“ValidationofanEnglishversionoftheChild-OIDPindex,anoralhealth-relatedqualityoflifemeasureforchildren.”HealthandQualityofLifeOutcomes4(2006):38.
page63
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX A: Evaluation Matrix
1. Is the oral health of young children improving? a) By community b) By vulverability?
Data Sources Data Collection by Indicator/Measure
KindergartenDentalSurveyDentalDataSet
ElectronicChildHealthRecord(e.g.,iPHIS,PARIS).
Dataregardingvulnerablepopulations:EarlyDevelopmentInstrument(EDI)Census2001MinistryofEducation
HAsendscompletedschool-levelspreadsheetandindividual-level(2009-10)kindergartendentalsurveyoutcomedata.
HAentersandsendsdentalservicedatainChildElectronicHealthRecord(e.g.,iPHIS).
HELPoverlaysschool-level(2006-07)andindividual-level(2009-10)dentalsurveyoutcomeswithde-identifieddatafromothersourcesregardingvulnerablepopulations(neighbourhood-levelandindividual-level.
%ofkindergartenchildrenbydentalsurveyoutcomecode(Code01,02,03,04),byyear,bycommunity,byvulnerability(EDI,SES).Changeindentalsurveyoutcomecode(Code01,02,03,04)overtime,bycommunity,byvulnerability.
%ofchildrenbydentalhealthriskassessmentcategory(regionallyspecific)byyear,bycommunity,byvulnerability(EDI,SES).Changeindentalhealthriskcategoryovertime,bycommunity,byvulnerability.
%receivingpublichealthdentalservicebyDentalServiceType(e.g.,CRA,FV1,FV2,FV3)
2a. Are the current dental health risk assessment/screen guidelines implemented as intended?
Programrecords(e.g.,brochures,logicmodel),strategydocumentsorreports.Consultationmeetingnotes.DentalhealthriskassessmentEnvironmentalScan.
HAstaff/designates(e.g.DentalHygienists,CertifiedDentalAssistants)
HAparticipationinfocusgroup/interview/questionnaire.
DescriptionbyHAof-Thedentalhealthriskassessmenttool/questionsarebeingusedwithchildrenaged0-5.-Age(s)theseassessmentsarebeingadministered.-Thetypesofstaffadministeringthedentalhealthriskassessment.-Theguidelinesandfollow-upbeingused.-Theextentthatprogramidentifiesabroadspectrumofchildrenatriskforcaries.-Forthoseeligiblechildrenwhodentalpublichealthisnotreaching,identificationofthebarriers.Reportofkeythemesandrecommendations;Lessonslearned.
2b. To what extent does the dental health risk assessment/ screen reach young children?
ElectronicChildHealthRecord(e.g.,iPHIS,PARIS).
HAentersdentalservicedata(tobedefined)inChildElectronicHealthRecord(e.g.,iPHIS,PARIS).
%childrenscreened/assessedbyECHA/dentalhealthriskassessment.
%childrenperdentalhealthriskcategory.
page64
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
3. Are health promotion interventions effective in supporting family dental health practices toward reducing early childhood caries?
HAstaff/designates:Keyregional/provincialstrategydocumentsorreports,interviewtranscript(s),questionnaire(s),orfocusgroupsummaries.
Parentsandcommunitypartners:Interviewtranscript(s),questionnaire(s),orfocusgroupsummaries.
HAstaff/designatesparticipationthroughinterview,questionnaire,orfocusgroupandprovisionofrelevant,keydocumentstotheHELPevaluationteam(tbd).
HELPParent Question-naire,Interview,orFocusGroup(tbd)
HELPCommunity Partner Questionnaire,Interview,orFocusGroup(tbd).
HAsmayassistinre-cruitment(e.g.,distributequestionnairestoparents,makebrochuresavailable).
Amongparents:-Proportionofparentsindicatingamoderateorhighknowledgeabout“healthpromoting”dentalpractices.
-Proportionofparentsindicatingchangesinattitudes,behaviour/skills,andknowledgeasaresultofhealthpromotion.
-%ofparentsreportingeachbarrier/facilitatortohealthpromotionandbehaviourchange.
-Evidencethatfamilieshavebetteraccesstopreventiveeducation.
Amongcommunitypartners:-Evidenceofalliedhealthprofessionalswhoreceiveddentalhealthpromotioneducation(e.g.mixortypesofprofessionals).-Communitymembersworkingwithfamiliesareawareoforalissuesincludingparentingskillsforprevention,andaccesstotreatment.
Strengthenedcommunitypartnerships:-Increaseddentalhealthpromotionthroughcommunitypartners.
4. What strategies are used in the health authorities to prevent early childhood dental disease? What is the most effective combination of strategies?
Programrecords(e.g.,brochures,logicmodel),strategydocumentsorreports.Consultationmeetingnotes.DentalHealthRiskassessmentEnvironmentalScan.
HAstaff/designates(e.g.,DentalHygienists,CertifiedDentalAssistants).
HELPDocumentReview.
HAparticipationinfocusgroup/interview/questionnaire.
-Documentation(descriptive)ofactivitiesforthefirstyearasabaseline.Documentation(descriptive)ofanychangestoactivitiesinfutureyears.
-Healthauthoritystaffandotherprogrampartnersdescribe:-Staffinglevels&roles.-Programpartners&roles.-Similarities&differencesbetweenpreventionactivities&processesacrosslocations/time.-Barriers/facilitatorstoprogramreachandimplementation.-Lessonslearned.Descriptionof-Whatmaybeworkinginareasthathaveintendedoutcomes?-Whatmaynotbeworkinginareasthatdonothaveintendedoutcomes?-Whatwerethecriticalsuccessfactors?-Howcouldtheprogrambeimproved?
page65
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX B: List of Evaluation Reports, Documents & Maps
ThefollowisalistofallthereportsanddocumentsthatHELPhascreatedduringthefouryearevaluationofBC’sEarlyChildhoodDentalprograms
• LogicModel:BritishColumbiaMinistryofHealthProvincialDentalHealthPrograms,2007
• BCEarlyChildhoodDentalPrograms:EvaluationFrameworkOverview,2007• BritishColumbiaEarlyChildhoodDentalProgram:ProposedEvaluationFramework
(56pages),2006• Analysis&Mappingofthe2006/07BritishColumbiaKindergartenDentalSurvey,
2009• Analysis&Mappingofthe2006/07&2009/10BritishColumbiaKindergarten
DentalSurveys,2011• DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups:ProvincialAnalysis,2009• DevelopmentandValidationofaProvincialCariesRiskAssessment(CRA)Tool,2008• DocumentReviewofKeyMessagesinOralHealth-RelatedPublicHealthHandouts,
2008• Analysis&Mappingofthe2006/07BritishColumbiaKindergartenDentalSurvey:
TheAboriginalPopulation[asrequestedbytheFirstNationsHealthCouncil],2008• Dental Health Risk Assessment Focus Groups: Regional Analyses, 2010
- FraserHealth:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups- InteriorHealth:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups- NorthernHealth:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups- VancouverCoastalHealth:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups- VancouverIslandHealth:DentalHealthRiskAssessmentFocusGroups
• Regional Logic Models, 2007- LogicModel:FraserHealthPublicHealthPreventionDentalProgram- LogicModel:InteriorHealthPublicHealthDentalServices- LogicModel:NorthernHealthPublicHealthDentalServices- LogicModel:VancouverCoastalDentalHealthServices- LogicModel:VancouverIslandPublicHealthDentalServices
• Regional Dental Health Risk Assessment Evaluation Project Summaries, 2010- FraserHealth:RegionalDentalHealthRiskAssessmentEvaluationProjectSummary
- InteriorHealth:RegionalDentalHealthRiskAssessmentEvaluationProjectSummary
- NorthernHealth:RegionalDentalHealthRiskAssessmentEvaluationProjectSummary
- VancouverCoastalHealth:RegionalDentalHealthRiskAssessmentEvaluationProjectSummary
- VancouverIslandHealth:RegionalDentalHealthRiskAssessmentEvaluationProjectSummary
• British Columbia Early Childhood Dental Programs Evaluation: Regional Summaries, 2010, 2011- FraserHealth:RegionalSummary- InteriorHealth:RegionalSummary- NorthernHealth:RegionalSummary- VancouverCoastalHealth:RegionalSummary- VancouverIslandHealth:RegionalSummary
page66
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Dental Tables and MapsInteractiveDentistLocationMap(includingdrivingdistancetoadentistinBC),2010
Map1.5AboriginalResidentsandDentalStatusinBCHealthAuthorities(requestedbyFirstNationsHealthCouncil),2008
Provincial Dental Mapping Package, January 26, 2011• DentalDecay2006/07• DentalDecay2009/10• DentalDecayChange2006/07-2009/10• PercentNoVisibleDecayExperience(Code01),2009/10• PercentFillingsorOtherRestorations(Code02),2009/10• PercentVisibleDecay(Code03),2009/10• PercentUrgentTreatmentNeeds(Code04),2009/10• BCSchoolDistricts
Provincial Dental Mapping with Socio-economic Status (SES) Overlays, March 22, 2011• KindergartenChildrenwithDentalDecayin2009/10,overlaidwith:
- SESIndexbySchooldistrictin2006- NoHighSchoolGraduationbySchoolDistrictin2006- IncidenceofLowIncomebySchoolDistrictin2005
• KindergartenChildrenwithDentalDecayin2006/07,overlaidwith:- SESIndexbySchoolDistrictin2006- NoHighSchoolGraduationbySchoolDistrictin2006 - Incidence of Low Income by School District in 2005
Interactive Health Authority Maps (Regional Zoomable PDFs), March 22, 2011• FraserHealth:InteractiveHealthAuthorityMap• InteriorHealth:InteractiveHealthAuthorityMap• NorthernHealth:InteractiveHealthAuthorityMap• VancouverCoastalHealth:InteractiveHealthAuthorityMap• VancouverIslandHealth:InteractiveHealthAuthorityMap• AllHealthAuthoritiesInteractiveMap,January26,2011
Neighbourhood Dental Mapping Packages, January 26, 2011• FraserHealth:DentalMappingPackage• InteriorHealth:DentalMappingPackage• NorthernHealth:DentalMappingPackage• VancouverCoastalHealth:DentalMappingPackage• VancouverIslandHealth:DentalMappingPackage
page67
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX C: Summary of Selected Studies Utilizing the Basic Screening Survey
BasicScreeningSurveysofEarlyChildhoodCaries(ECC)PrevalenceinVariousPopulations
Investigator(s)Region / Country
Sample size Sample demographics Measure Prevalence %
Coteetal.(2006)132
U.S. 224 Refugeesage6mos-18yrs
UntreatedcariesCariesexperienceEarlycareUrgentcare
49515314
11,296 NHANESIIIcomparisonAge2-17
UntreatedcariesCariesexperienceEarlycareUrgentcare
2349193
Lukesetal.(2006)133
Illinois,U.S. 490 Childrenofmigrantandseasonalfarmworkers,Age6-9
UntreateddecayCariesexperienceTreatmenturgency
476612
DentalHeathFoundation(2006)134
California,U.S.
10,949 Kindergartenstudents UntreateddecayCariesexperienceEarlycareUrgentcare
2854215
ConnecticutDepartmentofPublicHealth(2007)135
Connecticut,U.S.
4,315 Kindergartenstudents UntreateddecayDecayexperienceEarlycareUrgentcare
1627120.6
Christensen(2007)136
Colorado,U.S.
3,023 Age5-10yrs(meanage6)
UntreateddecayCariesexperienceEarlycareUrgentcare
2345185
Beltranetal.(1997)137
Georgia,U.S.
632 Age5-12yrs UntreateddecayCariesexperienceRestorationpresentUrgentcare
40594013
Note:AllmeasureslistedabovewerebasedonconsistentindicatordefinitionsfromtheBSSmanual,althoughsomestudieslabeled“Untreateddecay”as“Untreatedcaries”and“Decayexperience”as“Cariesexperience.”“Earlycare”indicatestreatmentrecommendedwithinseveralweeksforcarieswithoutotheroralhealthproblemsorsymptoms.“Urgentcare”indicatestreatmentrequiredassoonaspossibleforpatientsexperiencingpain,infection,orswelling.
132S..Coteetal.,“DentalcariesofrefugeechildrencomparedwithUSChildren,”Pediatrics114,no.6(2004):e733-740.133S.M.Lukes,S.Wadhawan,andL.N.Lampiris,“HealthySmilesHealthyGrowth2004-BasicScreeningSurveyofmigrantandseasonalfarmworkerchildreninIllinois.,”Journal of Public Health Dentistry66,no.3(2006):216-218.134DentalHealthFoundation,“Mommy,ithurtstochew.”The California Smile Survey: An oral health assessment of California’s kindergarten and 3rd grade children.(Oakland,CA,2006).135ConnecticutDepartmentofPublicHealth,Every smile counts: the oral health of Connecticut’s children(Hartford,CT,2007).136MathewChristensen,Colorado oral health survey 2006-2007 school year: Preliminary results.(Denver,CO:ColoradoDepartmentofPublicHealthandEnvironment,2007).137Beltrán,Malvitz,andEklund,“Validityoftwomethodsforassessingoralhealthstatusofpopulations.”
page68
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX D: Methodological Notes
Data suppressionThekindergartendentalhealthdatacollectedbytheMinistryofHealthwasaggregatedtopreventidentificationofanindividualclient.Datasuppressionisrequiredforanydatasamplewheretherearelessthan5.Assuch,HealthAuthoritieswereinstructedbytheBCMinistryofHealthtosuppress(i.e.,remove)anysensitiveinformationforschoolswherefive(5)orfewerkindergartenstudentsweresurveyed,orincaseswherefive(5)orlessstudentswereassignedtoagivendentalhealthcategory(e.g.,Code01,Code02).Afterthisprocesswascomplete,HAssenttheirschool-leveldentaldatatothemanageroftheEarlyChildhoodHealthandScreeningProgramwithinBCMinistryofHealth,whointurnsentthedatatotheevaluationteamatHELP.Asimilarprocesswasenactedforthe2009/10;however,onlyschoolswithfewerthansix(6)studentssurveyedweresuppressedfromthedataset.
HELP Neighbourhoods NeighbourhoodboundarieswereoriginallycreatedthroughtheconsensusoflocalEarlyChildDevelopmentCoalitionslocatedthroughouttheprovince.HELPwasinstrumentalincoordinatingthisboundarydefinitionprocess,theresultofwhichidentified478sociallyandgeographicallyrelevantcommunitiesinBC.VisibledentaldecaypercentagesforHELPneighbourhoodswerecalculatedbyaggregatingschool-levelinformationintoneighbourhoods.439neighbourhoodsweresurveyedin2006/07and465neighbourhoodsweresurveyedin2009/10.Theanalysispresentedhereinpertainstothelinkeddatabasefile,whichincludescommondataelementsfor437neighbourhoodsthatweresurveyedinbothyearsoftheKindergartenDentalSurvey.Thisnumberislessthantheoriginal478neighbourhoodsbecausenotallneighbourhoodsweresurveyedineachsurveyyearandinsomecases,neighbourhoodsthatweresurveyedinoneyearwerenotsurveyedintheotheryear.
Detailed results of the t-testsApaired-sample t-testwasusedtodetermineiftheoralhealthofchildreninBCwasimprovingovertime,usingHELPneighbourhoodsastheunitofanalysis.Paired-samplet-testscompareneighbourhoodratesofvisibledentaldecaybetweensurveyyearstodetermineifstatisticallysignificantchangeshaveoccurredovertime.Theaveragerateofearlychildhoodvisibledentaldecay(Code02+03)fortheprovincialsampleof437neighbourhoodswas38.8%in2006/07and37.0%in2009/10.Thesetworatesareusedforcomparisonbythepairedsamplest-test.
• Theresultsofthepaired-samplest-test(analysisnotshown,butavailableuponrequest)provideinitialstatisticalevidencethattheoveralloralhealthofBC’skindergartenchildrenimprovedbetweensurveyyears.- Thet-valueof-3.44indicatesthattherateofvisibledentaldecayhasdeclinedbetweensurveyyears(2006/07and2009/10).
- Thep-value=.001demonstratesthestatisticalsignificanceofthisfinding.Inotherwords,wecanbe99.9%certainthatourfindingofanoverallimprovementinoralhealthisaccurate.
• Inadditiontotheoverallprovincialanalysis,aseriesofpaired-samples
page69
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
t-testswererunforeachofthefive(5)HealthAuthoritiesandsixteen(16)HealthServiceDeliveryAreas(HSDAs).Theanalysisrevealedthefollowingfindings:- Two(2)outoffive(5)HAsshowedstatisticallysignificantimprovementsinoralhealth:theInterior(t=-3.38;p=.001)andVancouverCoastalHealth(t=-5.98;p<.001).
- Five(5)outofsixteen(16)HSDAsshowedstatisticallysignificantimprovementsinoralhealth(seeTable2.1and/orFigure4forreference):KootenayBoundary(t=-2.73;p<.05);NorthShore/CoastGaribaldi(t=-4.18;p<.001);Okanagan(t=-1.88;p<.10);Richmond(t=-2.73;p<.05);andVancouver(t=-2.73;p<.001).
Measuring effect sizeBeyondstatisticaltestsofsignificance(e.g.,t-test),testsofeffectsize(Cohen’sd)measurethemagnitudeorthesizeoftheobservedeffect.Oneadvantageoftestsforeffectsizeisthattheyarenotinfluencedbythesizeofthesample.Thisisimportantbecauseassamplesizeincreases,sodoesthelikelihoodofobtainingstatisticalsignificance.AccordingtoCohen(1988),aneffectsizeof.2issmall,.5ismedium,and.8islarge.
Thecalculatedeffectsizefortheprovincialsampleofn=437isd=.15,whichaccordingtoCohen’stypologyisrelativelysmall.Inotherwords,althoughthedecreaseintherateofprovincialrateofvisibledentaldecayfrom2006/07to2009/10isstatisticallysignificant,theoverallmagnitudeofchangeisrelativelysmall.
EffectsizesforthetwoHAsthatdemonstratedsignificantimprovementsinoralhealthovertimeweremorepronouncedthanfortheprovinceasawhole:d=.35(Interior)andd=.49(VCHA).
EffectsizesforthefiveHSDAsthatweresignificantareasfollows:KootenayBoundary(d=.73);NorthShore/CoastGaribaldi(d=.18);Okanagan(d=.88);Richmond(d=.73);andVancouver(d=.73).
Interpreting the findings of the regression analysisThediagramoppositedemonstratesthepredictedrelationshipsbetweenSES,kindergartendentalhealthandearlychilddevelopment.
Asthediagrampredicts,thesocioeconomicstatusofcommunitiesmayhavedirectinfluencesonbothearlychilddevelopmentandearlychildhoodcaries.Thismodelwasusedtoguidetheanalysisofearlychildhooddentalhealthanddevelopment.
Tables7.1and7.2presentthreepiecesofinformationfortherelationshipbetweeneachSESmeasure(independentvariables)andthe%VisibleDentalDecay(dependentvariable):
Socioeconomic Status
Early ChildDevelopment
Visible DentalDecay
page70
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
1. The“b” coefficientrepresentstheunstandardizedvalueforbeta,whichistheamountofincreaseinthedependentvariable(%VisibleDentalDecay)forevery1%increaseinthemeasureofSES.Forexample,the%VisibleDentalDecayincreasesby.704%forevery1%increaseinthe%NoHighSchool,controllingfortheeffectsofunionorprofessionalmembership,non-fluencyinEnglishorFrench,low-income,lone-parentfamilies,residentialmobilityandAboriginalidentity.
2. “s.e.”isthestandard error,ortheestimateoftheamountthatourpredictedvaluefor%VisibleDentalDecayis“off”fromtheactualvalueinthepopulation.**Toarriveatat-value,onecouldsimplydivideb/s.e.Thet-valueprovidesatestofstatisticalsignificance.Values+1.96(foratwo-tailedtest)aretypicallyneededtoobtainsignificancelevelofp=.05,whichisdenotedbyanasterisk(*);ifp<.01,twoasterisks(**)areused.
3. ThethirdpieceofinformationinthetableistheImportance Scores,whichrepresenttheamount(%)ofvarianceexplainedbythevariable,relativetoallothervariablesinthemodel.Higherimportancescores(positivevalues)representstrongerrelationshipswiththe%VisibleDentalDecayrelativetotheothervariablesinthemodel.ImportanceScoresarecalculatedasfollows:[(Pearson’sr)*(betaweight)*(100)]/R2foreachvariableinthemodel.ThesumofImportanceScoresis100andnegativescoresindicatethattherelationshipbetweentheSES-measureand%VisibleDentalDecayswitchesitsdirection(from+to–orviceversa)fromthecorrelationanalysistotheregressionanalysis,whichincludesothervariablesintheanalysis.Thisusuallyoccurswhenthecorrelationisinitiallysmall,andthenitchangessignsintheregressionanalysisbecausetheeffectsoftheothervariablesinfluencetherelationship.
IntheanalysisoftheelevenHELPSESsubcomponentsaspredictorsofthe%VisibleDentalDecay,afewmethodologicalconsiderationsweremadetoimprovetheanalysis.SeveraloftheSESsubcomponentswerehighlycorrelatedwithoneanother,whichcanresultinunpredictableresultsduetomulticollinearity.Morespecifically,theSESsubcomponentsforWealth,Education,SocialAssistanceandMedianGovernmentTransferswereallhighlycorrelatedwithoneanother(i.e.,abover=.70).Inaddition,HousingDensitywashighlycorrelatedwithResidentialStability(r=.74).Runningregressionanalyseswhileincludingallofthesesubcomponentsaspredictorswouldreducetheoverallefficiencyofthemodelandcouldleadtoamisinterpretationofresults.Therefore,separatemodelswereruntocompensateforthismulticollinearity:
Model1.WealthwasincludedalongwithUnemployment,ResidentialStability,Poverty,LoneParents,LanguageandImmigration,andWomeninManufacturing,aspredictorsofthe%VisibleDentalDecay.Thisrepresentsour“MainModel.”
Model2.TheWealthsubcomponentwasdroppedfromthemodelandeachofthehighlycorrelatedsubcomponents(Education,SocialAssistance,andMedianGovernmentTransfers)wereenteredasseparatemodelsintheregressionanalysis.
Note:HousingDensitywasdroppedfromtheanalysesaltogetherduetoahighcorrelationwithResidentialMobilityandarelativelylowcorrelationwithdentaldecay(r<.20inboth2006/07and2009/10).
page71
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Thismethodologicaltechnique,ofenteringkeyvariablesandremovingothersfromtheanalysis,hastheadvantageofremoving,atleastpartially,thenegativeeffectsofcollinearityfromtheregressionmodels.Thefinalmodelcoefficients(e.g.,F,R2,Std.ErroroftheEstimate)allcorrespondtotheregressionmodelwithWealthincluded.
Interpreting the Early Development Instrument (EDI) Initsdevelopment,theEDIhasundergonepsychometrictestingacrossCanadatoensureitsvalidityandreliability.138OngoingtestingiscarriedoutbothinCanadaandothercountriesthatareusingtheEDI.(Moreinformationandalinktoacopyoftheinstrumentcanbefoundathttp://www.earlylearning.ubc.ca/research/initiatives/early-development-instrument/).
Vulnerabilitydescribestheportionofapopulationwhich,withoutadditionalsupportandcare,mayexperiencechallengesandwhichmaynotfunctionaswellinschoolandsociety.ThedeterminationofvulnerabilityisbasedonEDIscores.Childrenwhoscorebelowthevulnerabilitycut-offonanEDIscalearesaidtobevulnerableonthatscaleofdevelopment.Vulnerabilitycut-offsweresetafterthefirstEDIpilotin1998.WhenthefirstpilotEDIdatahadbeencollected,analysisshowedthat,oneachoftheEDIscales,approximately10%ofthechildrenfittedaprofileofvulnerability.Usingthesedata,thecutoffforeachoftheEDIscaleswasdeterminedusingtherangeofactualscorescollectedandsettingvulnerabilityatthescorethatrepresentedthelowest10%ofthatrange.Thevulnerabilitycut-offscoreshaveremainedconsistentsincetheywerefirstcalculated.HELP’sresearchoverthelast10years,inB.C.andacrossCanada,hasdemonstratedthatthecut-offshavetremendouspredictivecapability:theydoexplainchildren’sschoolexperience,andarehighlycorrelatedwithadolescentandadulthealthandwell-beingmeasuresaswell.
ResultsfromtheEDIareinterpretedonlyatthelevelofthegroup(school,neighbourhood,region,orschooldistrict).Resultsareneverinterpretedattheindividuallevel.Communitiesbenefitfromthisresearchinanumberofways.Theresearchhelpstoshowwheretherearelargedifferencesinchildren’sdevelopment;wheregroupsofchildrenaremoreorlessdevelopmentallyreadyforschoolacrosscommunities,regions,andtheprovince;andhowbroadsocio-economicfactorsmayinfluencechildren’searlydevelopment.Thisinformationcanhelpcommunitymembersbecomemoreawareofwaystocreateenvironmentstohelpchildrenandfamiliesthrive.TheEDIalsoprovidesinformationonchildren’sdevelopmentindistinctpopulations.TrendsinthedevelopmentofchildrenwhoareAboriginalorspeakEnglishasasecondlanguagecanbeanalyzedseparately.Formoreinformationontheinterpretationofresultsforthesegroups,pleasesee:http://www.earlylearning.ubc.ca/research.
138M.Janusetal.,TheEarlyDevelopmentInstrument:population-basedmeasureforcommunities:ahandbookondevelopment,propertiesanduse(Hamilton,Ont.:OffordCentreforChildStudies,2007).
page72
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX E: HELP SES Scales and Subscales
DataSources:2004TaxFilerand2006Censusdata
Wealth: Families with Children
%familiesreceivinginvestmentincomeorcapitalgains,familieswithchildrenunder18%familiesdeclaringcharitabledonations,familieswithchildrenunder18%familiesreceivinginvestmentincomeorcapitalgains,familieswithchildrenunder6%familiesdeclaringcharitabledonations,familieswithchildrenunder6%familiesdeclaringcharitabledonations,lonefemalefamilieswithchildrenunder18%familiesdeclaringcharitabledonations,couplefamilieswithchildrenunder18%familiesreceivinginvestmentincomeorcapitalgains,couplefamilieswithchildrenunder6%offamiliesdeclaringcharitabledonations,couplefamilieswithchildrenunder6
Unemployment
Employmentrate,childrenunder6Femaleunemploymentrate,females15andupFemaleunemploymentrate,females25andupMaleemploymentrate,childrenanyageMaleemploymentrate,childrenunder6Participationrate,25andupUnemploymentrate,childrenunder6Unemploymentrate,all15andupUnemploymentrate,all25andup
Residential Stability%movedinlastyear%ofnon-migrantmoversINLAST5YEARSHomeownershipratePoverty:WomenOnlyEarners%heterosexualfamilies,femaleonlyemploymentincome,familiesw/nounder18%heterosexualfamilies,femaleonlyemploymentincome,familiesw/childrenunder18%heterosexualfamilies,femaleonlyemploymentincome,familiesw/childrenunder6
Lone Parents%loneparentfamilies%lonefemalefamilies%lonemalefamiliesShareofalllonemotherfamilieswithchildrenunder18inentirepopulationShareofalllonemotherfamilieswithchildrenunder6inentirepopulation
Housing Density PercentageofsingledetachedhousesPercentageofapartmentthathas5ormorestoriesPercentageofapartmentthathasfewerthan5stories
Language and Immigration%BuddhistsNumberofnon-Christianreligions,1%ofpoporgreater%3rdormoregeneration15yrsandover%firstgenerationCanadians%immigrantswhoarrivedbefore1961%immigrantswhoarrivedbefore1991and1995%immigrantswhoarrivedbefore1996and2001%immigrantswhoarrivedbefore1961and1970%ofpopwithCanadianCitizenship%oftotalpopthatimmigratedbetween1996-2001%homelanguageEnglish%ofpopwithEnglishasmothertongue%ofpopwithnon-officiallanguageasmothertongue%usingforeigninhomelanguage%visibleminority
page73
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
Women in Manufacturing
%womeninmanufacturingpositions
Education%ofpeopleaged20andolderwithauniversitydegree%ofpeopleaged20andolderwhohavenotgraduatedfromhighschool
Social Assistance %familieswithyoungchildrenreceivingsocialassistance%familieswithoutyoungchildrenreceivingsocialassistance
Median Government TransfersMedianamountofgovernmenttransfers,forfamilieswithyoungchildrenMedianamountofgovernmenttransfers,forfamilieswithoutyoungchildren
Creation of the HELP SES Index ForeachofthevariableswithintheHELPSESIndexandComponents,astandardscorewascalculatedforeachneighbourhoodinBC.Forsomevariables,wherehigherscoresareassociatedwithlowersocio-economicstatus,thesestandardscoresthenhadtobe“reversed”(i.e.,thesignwaschanged)tomaintainconsistencyintheIndex(i.e.,allSESmeasurescodedsoastobe“protective”factorsinrelationtokindergartenvisibledentaldecay).Unemploymentandloneparenthoodaretwoexamplesofvariableswherethescoreswerereversed.Foreachcomponent,themeanofthestandardizedscoresofthevariablesinthatcomponentwascalculatedforeachneighbourhood.Sincethemeanforeachvariableoveralliszero,themeanofthesecomponentscoresisalsozero.However,thestandarddeviationofthesecomponentscoresislessthan1becauseoftheaggregationoverseveralstandardizedindividualvariables.Thesemeancomponentscoreswerethenstandardizedtohaveastandarddeviationof1.TheSESIndexwasthenconstructedbytakingthemeanofthesestandardizedcomponentscores.Again,theaggregationprocessresultsinanIndexwithanoverallmeanof0,butastandarddeviationoflessthan1,andsoasafinalstep,theHELPSESIndexwasstandardizedbysettingtheoverallstandarddeviationto1.
page74
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
APPENDIX F: Key Messages In Oral Health-related Public Health Handouts
Fivemainthemesemergedfroma2007/2008reviewofBCpublichealthhandoutsrelatedtooralhealthandnutritionforchildrenunder6:
1) Dentist visits.Withinthedentalvisittheme,theprimarymessagewasthatachildshouldhavethefirstdentistvisit6monthsaftertheappearanceofthefirsttoothoraroundageoneandthenseeadentistevery6to12months.
2) Signs of decay.Therewassomeoverlapbetweenthedentalvisitanddecaythemesasakeymessageunderthedecaythemewastocheckababy’smouthoncemonthlyforsignsofdecay,suchaswhiteorbrownspotsontheteethparticularlynearthegumline,andtoseeadentistifdecaywassuspectedorvisible.Thesecondkeymessagewithinthedecaythemerelatedtobacterialtransferencefromcaregivertochild.Handoutsinformedparentsthatbacteria,someofwhichcausetoothdecay,begintogrowuponappearanceofachild’sfirsttooth.Advicetoreducetheriskofbacterialtransmissionincludedusingseparatetoothbrushesandspoonsaswellaswashingasootherinwaterratherthanlickingittocleanit.Inaddition,caregiverswereadvisedtouseafluoridetoothpastethemselvesandtoensurethattheirowndentalworkwasuptodate.Onehealthauthorityhadhandouts,whichnotedthatwhencaregiversofyoungchildrenchewgum-containingxylitol,fewerbacteriaweretransmittedtochildren,andthosechildrenhadfewercavities.
3) Tooth brushing and fluoride.Manyhandoutsaddressedtoothbrushingandfluoridetoothpasteuseindetail.Thisthemealsoincludedinstructionstocleanababy’sgumstwicedailywithaclean,dampfaceclothpriortotheappearanceofteeth.Oncethefirsttoothappeared,parentsweretouseasoftbabytoothbrushwithasmearoffluoridetoothpastetobrushteethtwicedaily,inthemorningandbeforebedtimeafterthelastbreastfeed,bottleorfood.Theamountoftoothpasteusedwastobeincreasedtoapea-sizedamountatage3to6yearsasmolarsappearedandanteriorteethfinishedcomingin.Flossingwastocommencewhenteethweretouching.Informationinthehandoutsinformedparentsthatchildrenwouldnotbeabletocleantheirownteethuntilaroundage6to8years,whentheyalsogainedthecapabilitytowritetheirownname.Thepurposeofthefluoridetoothpastewasnotedtobeforthepreventionofcariesbyhelpingteethbemoreresistanttoacidsfromfoodsandcavitycausingbacteria.Fluoridevarnishwasrecommendedfor:childrenwhohadwhitespotlesions,previouscariesexperience,orcurrentoralcaredifficulties;childrenwhosleptwithabottlecontainingaliquidotherthanwater;childrenwhodidnothavetheirteethcleanedtwicedailywithafluoridetoothpaste;orchildrenwhoseprimarycaregiverhadhaddecayinthepast12months.
4) Feeding practices.Drinkingandfeedinghabitsrelatedtodentaloutcomeswasanotherpopularthemecoveredinmanyhandouts.Areoccurringmessagewasthatthelengthoftimeasugar-containingbeverageorfoodisincontactwithteethisafactorfortoothdecay.Forexample,manyhandoutscommentedthatachildwhosleptwithabottlecontainingaliquidotherthanwaterwasatriskfortoothdecay.Listsofsugar-containingbeverages,suchascow’smilk,formula,fruitjuiceandsweeteneddrinks(e.g.icedtea,pop,lemonade)werereportedinnumerous
page75
Evaluation of BC Early Childhood Dental Programs - Final Report
handouts.Theuseofaclean,wetclothtowipebaby’smouthafternursingwasadvised.Stickyfoods,suchasteethingcookiesandbiscuitswerenotrecommendedbecausetheyremainonteethforlengthyperiodsoftimeandprovideaneasilyaccessiblesubstrateorfoodforcavitycausingbacteria.Puttingsugar,honeyorcornsyruponasootheralsowasadvisedagainst.Inaddition,frequentsipping(liquidsotherthanwater)andeatingduringthedaytimealsowasnotedtobeariskfortoothdecay.Becauseitdoesnotcausetoothdecay,waterwassuggestedasathirstquencherbetweenmealswithmilkandjuicereservedformealandsnacktimes.Finally,informationfromanumberofhandoutsrecommendedswitchingfromabottletoacupstartingat6to9monthsofagewithcompletionoftheswitchby12to14monthsofage.
5) Barriers to access.Barrierstoaccesswasalesscommonlyoccurringthemeamongthehandouts.Forexample,onehealthauthorityhadacoupleofhandoutsthatdescribeddentalprogramsavailabletovulnerablepopulations,suchasfamiliesonPremiumAssistancethroughtheirmedicalplan,clientsoftheMinistryofHumanResourcesorMinistryofChildrenandFamilyDevelopment,Aboriginalchildrenwithastatusnumber,orchildrenfromlow-incomefamilies,whowereinneedofurgentcareduetopain,infectionorseveredecay.