26
EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS YEAR 2005 YEAR 2005

EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

  • Upload
    kosey

  • View
    36

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS. YEAR 2005. GENERAL DEMOGRAPHICS GENDER. PATIENTS’ AGE GROUPS. DURATION OF DISEASE AGE. DIFFERENCE OF MS AT POSTTREATMENT. DIFFERENCE OF VAS ( PAIN ) AT POSTTREATMENT. DIFFERENCE OF OWB AT POSTTREATMENT. DIFFERENCE OF MHAQ AT POSTTREATMENT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTSEVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

YEAR 2005YEAR 2005

Page 2: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

GENERAL DEMOGRAPHICSGENERAL DEMOGRAPHICSGENDERGENDER

♀ ♀ %% ♂♂ %% Total Total

ASAS 147147 35,335,3 269269 64,764,7 416416

Page 3: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

PATIENTS’ AGE GROUPSPATIENTS’ AGE GROUPS

-20-20 %%21-21-4040 %%

41-41-6060 %% 61+61+ %% Mean Mean

ASAS 00 00 8080 19,219,2 281281 67,567,5 5555 13,313,3 49,749,7

Page 4: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DURATION OF DISEASE AGEDURATION OF DISEASE AGE

-10-10 %%11-11-2020 %%

21-21-3030 %% 31+31+ %% MeanMean

ASAS 122122 29,329,3 156156 37,537,5 101101 24,324,33737

8,98,9 16,916,9

Page 5: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF MS DIFFERENCE OF MS AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

MS1MS1

--

MS2MS2

Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 359359 86,386,3 1717 4,14,1 4040 9,69,6

MEANMEAN MS1MS1 MS2MS2

ASAS 5959 21,721,7

Page 6: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF VAS ( PAIN ) DIFFERENCE OF VAS ( PAIN ) AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

VAS1VAS1

--

VAS2VAS2

(pain)(pain)

Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 378378 90,990,9 3434 8,18,1 44 11

MEANMEAN VAS1VAS1 VAS2VAS2

ASAS 47,447,4 18,318,3

Page 7: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF OWB DIFFERENCE OF OWB AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

OWB1OWB1

--

OWB2OWB2

Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 387387 92,892,8 2424 5,75,7 66 1,51,5

MEANMEAN OWB1OWB1 OWB2OWB2

ASAS 51,851,8 19,919,9

Page 8: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF MHAQ DIFFERENCE OF MHAQ AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

MHAQ1MHAQ1

--

MHAQ2MHAQ2

Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 338338 81,281,2 1919 4,54,5 5959 14,314,3

MEANMEAN MHAQ1MHAQ1 MHAQ2MHAQ2

ASAS 15,1815,18 11,6411,64

Page 9: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF BASFI DIFFERENCE OF BASFI AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

BASFI1BASFI1

--

BASFI2BASFI2Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 394394 94,794,7 1818 4,34,3 44 11

MEANMEAN BASFI1BASFI1 BASFI2BASFI2

ASAS 39,2439,24 17,5117,51

Page 10: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF BASDAI DIFFERENCE OF BASDAI AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

BASDAI1BASDAI1

--

BASDAI2BASDAI2Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 391391 9494 2424 5,75,7 11 0,30,3

MEANMEAN BASDAI1BASDAI1 BASDAI2BASDAI2

ASAS 44,244,2 17,6517,65

Page 11: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF SCHOBERDIFFERENCE OF SCHOBERAT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

SCHB1SCHB1

--

SCHB2SCHB2Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 2121 5,15,1 267267 64,264,2 128128 30,730,7

MEANMEAN SCHB1SCHB1 SCHB2SCHB2

ASAS 31,2531,25 36,6736,67

Page 12: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF Thorax Expansion DIFFERENCE OF Thorax Expansion AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

ThExp1ThExp1

--

ThExp2ThExp2Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 1313 3,13,1 366366 8888 3737 8,98,9

MEANMEAN ThExp1ThExp1 ThExp2ThExp2

ASAS 34,334,3 48,6648,66

Page 13: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF Wall-Occiput DistanceDIFFERENCE OF Wall-Occiput DistanceAT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

WO1WO1

--

WO2WO2Dec Dec %% IncInc %% SameSame %%

ASAS 247247 59,459,4 55 1,21,2 165165 39,439,4

MEANMEAN WO1WO1 WO2WO2

ASAS 55,955,9 37,4837,48

Page 14: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

ANALGESIC USAGE ANALGESIC USAGE AT PRETREATMENTAT PRETREATMENT

AA A-A- %% A+A+ %%

ASAS 266266 63,9463,94 150150 36,0536,05

Page 15: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF “A” USAGE AT DIFFERENCE OF “A” USAGE AT POSTTREATMENTPOSTTREATMENT

AA SameSame %% Dec Dec %% IncInc %% Sep Sep %%

ASAS 6969 4646 5353 35,335,3 66 44 2222 14,714,7

Page 16: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

NSAID USAGE NSAID USAGE AT PRETREATMENTAT PRETREATMENT

NSAIDNSAID NSAID-NSAID- %% NSAID+NSAID+ %%

ASAS 126126 30,330,3 290290 69,769,7

Page 17: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF NSAID USAGE DIFFERENCE OF NSAID USAGE AT POST-TREATMENTAT POST-TREATMENT

NSAIDNSAID SameSame %%Dec Dec

%% IncInc %% Sep Sep %%

ASAS 169169 58,358,3 7777 26,526,5 22 0,70,7 4242 14,514,5

Page 18: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

STEROID USAGE STEROID USAGE AT PRE-TREATMENTAT PRE-TREATMENT

STRSTR STR-STR- %% STR+STR+ %%

ASAS 392392 94,294,2 2424 5,85,8

Page 19: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF “STR” USAGE DIFFERENCE OF “STR” USAGE AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

STRSTR SameSame %% Dec Dec %% IncInc %% Sep Sep %%

ASAS 1717 70,870,8 33 12,512,5 11 4,24,2 33 12,512,5

Page 20: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

USAGE OF OTHER DRUGS USAGE OF OTHER DRUGS AT PRETREATMENTAT PRETREATMENT

OTHOTH OTHER-OTHER- %% OTHER+OTHER+ %%

ASAS 313313 75,375,3 103103 24,724,7

Page 21: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DIFFERENCE OF OTHER DRUGS DIFFERENCE OF OTHER DRUGS AT POSTTREATMENTAT POSTTREATMENT

OTHOTH SameSame %% Dec Dec %% IncInc %% Sep Sep %%

ASAS 9999 96,296,2 44 3,83,8 00 00 00 00

Page 22: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

MOSTLY SEEN MOSTLY SEEN SECONDARY DISEASESSECONDARY DISEASES

SEC.SEC.

DIS.DIS.

NONO

%%

YESYES

%%

HTHT

%%

CADCAD

%%

DMDM

%%COLDCOLD

%%

CACA

%%DEPRDEPR

%%

TROITROI

%%

OTHOTH

%%

ASAS172172

41,3441,34

244244

58,6558,65

7171

29,0929,09

2121

8,68,6

1414

5,735,73

2525

10,2410,24

88

3,273,27

88

3,273,27

2222

9,019,01

140140

57,3757,37

Page 23: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

DAILY POLICLINIC CASESDAILY POLICLINIC CASES

POLIPOLICLNCLN

NONO

%%

YESYES

%%

TRATRA

%%

EYEEYE

%%

URSURS

%%

DERDER

%%

DIARDIAR

%%

PAINPAIN

%%

USEUSE

%%

OTHOTH

%%

ASAS284284

68,2668,26

132132

31,7331,73

66

4,544,54

99

6,816,81

2222

16,6616,66

99

6,816,81

1313

9,849,84

6060

45,4545,45

11

0,750,75

2929

21,9621,96

Page 24: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

PATIENTS WHO WERE PATIENTS WHO WERE REFERRED TO HOSPITALREFERRED TO HOSPITAL

CONCONSULTSULT

NONO

%%

MRMR

%%

EYEEYE

%%

ENTENT

%%DERDER

%%

ORTORT

%%

NEUNEU

%%

ASAS405405

97,3597,35

11

0,240,24

33

0,720,72

11

0,240,24

11

0,240,24

22

0,480,48

33

0,720,72

Page 25: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS

THANK YOU THANK YOU

FOR YOUR ATTENTIONFOR YOUR ATTENTION

Page 26: EVALUATION OF AS PATIENTS