PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Reviewer Name : Reviewer's Organization : Title:

LOT :Province :CSO :

Number Evaluation Criteria Max Points

1 Relevance 8

1.1 4

1.2 4

2 Methodology & Implementation Arrangements 32

2.1 4

2.2 4

2.3 4

2.4 4

2.5 4

2.6 4

2.7 4

2.8 4

3 Replicability/Sustainability 6

3.1 3

3.2 3

4 Innovation 2

4.1 2

5 Technical Capacity of Applicant 20

Is the proposed project relevant to the overall objectives of the CFP including Annexes?

Does the proposal focus on relevant target groups and geographical locations as stated in the CFP?

Feasibility: Will the applicant be able to implement planned activities within the proposed timetable and budget?

Are the proposed methods and implementation arrangements appropriate, practical and consistent with the proposed activities and expected results?

Does the applicant have strong coalitions or networks with local stakeholders to implement their proposed projects?

Does the applicant have experience with local government in the project areas?

Does the proposal include well defined log frame with measurable indicators?

Are the proposed implementation arrangements sufficient to implement the project?

Will the project cover maximum number of beneficiaries / areas in line with CFP?

Does the proposal promote gender equality and women’s empowerment?

Can the benefits of the proposed project be sustained after the grant duration ends?

Will it be feasible for the proposed project be expanded and/or replicated?

Does the project propose innovative methods to achieve the intended results in the local context?

5.1 4

5.2 4

5.3

5.4

Team Leader:

4

5.5

Programme Personnel:

4

5.6

Administrative & Finance Personnel:

4

6 Financial Capacity 12

6.1 4

6.2 What is the maximum amount of money the CSO has managed? 4

6.3 4

7 Cost 207.1 Is the proposed budget realistic? 107.2 Does the budget include any ineligible cost? 10

GRAND TOTAL 100

Remarks:: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014

Does the applicant have relevant past experience in a similar project?

Does the applicant have adequate operation capacity to manage the project and provide logistical support and infrastructure?

Do the proposed project personnel have sufficient knowledge and experience?

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic, or environment with at least 10 years experiences in project management

Have a bachelor degree in social sciences, economic or environment with at least 4 year experience working in capacity building and/or community empowerment

Have a bachelor degree in finance or social sciences with at least 3 year experience handling project administration and finance.

Does the CSO have the ability to ensure proper financial recording and reporting?

Did CSO have an external financial audit? What was the outcome?

PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Subnational REDD+ Small Scale Program in West Sumatera, Jambi and East Kalimantan

Points Comments

: Will be filled after obtaining the necessary data from Capacity Assessment Process, at the latest by Friday, 28 November 2014