Upload
nguyenbao
View
224
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY)
FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE
BUS COMPLIANCE Wesley G. Zanardelli, Ph.D. Advanced Propulsion Team
US Army TARDEC
CPT John Kelly ARSC, DET 8
US ARMY RDECOM-TARDEC
16 August 2012 UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release.
Disclaimer: Reference herein to any specific commercial company, product, process, or service by
trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its
endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Department of
the Army (DoA). The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect
those of the United States Government or the DoA, and shall not be used for advertising or product
endorsement purposes.
Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. REPORT DATE 16 AUG 2012
2. REPORT TYPE Briefing
3. DATES COVERED 16-07-2012 to 15-08-2012
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OFMIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARDGENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) Wesley Zanardelli; John Kelly
5d. PROJECT NUMBER
5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC,6501 East Eleven Mile Rd,Warren,Mi,48397-5000
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER #23263
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army TARDEC, 6501 East Eleven Mile Rd, Warren, Mi, 48397-5000
10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S) TARDEC
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S) #23263
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES FOR GVSETS 2012
14. ABSTRACT Briefing Charts
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
Public Release
18. NUMBEROF PAGES
30
19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON
a. REPORT unclassified
b. ABSTRACT unclassified
c. THIS PAGE unclassified
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Presentation Overview
• Objectives
• Background
• Experimental Setup
• Characterization and Power Quality Test Procedures
• Experimental Results
• Modeling
• Simulation Results
• Modeling Parameter Variation
• Conclusions
• Future work
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Objectives
• Component level compliance with MIL-PRF-
GCS600A(ARMY)
• Identification of parameters on power generation
components
• Electrical machine characterization
• Modeling
• System level power quality compliance
• Optimization of high-voltage bus capacitance
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Background
MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY)
• 3.1.3 Electrical Characteristics
16 August 2012
Steady-state Voltage 565V – 635V (600V ± 35V)
Ripple Amplitude 9V
Distortion Factor 0.015
• Normal Transients: 475V – 725V for 15ms • Distortion Spectrum
DCV
hh
V
1
2
Factor Distortion
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
• MIL-STD-704F (270VDC) • MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) (600VDC)
Background
MIL-STD-704F vs. MIL-PRF-
GCS600A(ARMY)
16 August 2012
• Normal Transients
Specification MIL-STD-704F (270VDC) % of Nominal MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) (600VDC)
% of Nominal
Steady-State Voltage 250V - 280V (270V +10V / -20V) 11.1% 565V - 635V (600V ± 35V) 11.7%
Normal Transients 200V - 330V for 20ms (up) / 10ms (down), 40ms settling time
48.1% 475V - 725V for 15ms, 40ms settling time
41.7%
Ripple Amplitude 6V 2.2% 9V 1.5%
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED Background
MIL-STD-704F vs. MIL-PRF-
GCS600A(ARMY)
16 August 2012
• MIL-STD-704F (270VDC)
• Distortion Factor: 0.015
• MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) (600VDC)
• Distortion Factor: 0.015
• Distortion Spectrum
Frequency Amplitude, dBV
Amplitude, V
% of Nominal
10 -10 0.316 0.12%
1000 10 3.16 1.2%
5000 10 3.16 1.2%
50,000 -10 0.316 0.12%
500,000 -50 0.00316 0.0012%
Frequency Amplitude, dBμV
Amplitude, V
% of Nominal
10 115 0.562 0.09%
1000 135 5.62 0.9%
5000 135 5.62 0.9%
50,000 115 0.562 0.09%
500,000 75 0.00562 0.0009%
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Background:
Typical Vehicle Architecture
• Vehicle Loads – Motor Drives & Voltage Converters
• Constant Power
• Capacitive (dc-link)
• Switching noise
– Resistive Loads
– Inductive Loads • EMI filters
• Phase Margin Reduction
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Background:
Generator Control Theory
• Active Rectification – Inverter required for Voltage Control
– Unity Power Factor is possible
at terminals
• Vector Control
16 August 2012
Generator Phasor Diagram Motor Phasor Diagram
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Electrical Diagram of Setup
• Generator, Inverter and Load Equivalent Circuit
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Experimental Setup
• AC Dynamometer
– Constant Torque: 1244N·m from 0-2,000rpm
– Constant Power: 260kW from 2,000-10,000rpm
• DC Power Supply
– 900V / 1000A / 250kW
• DC Load Bank
– 250kW in 5kW Steps
• Temperature and Flow Regulated PGW cooling loops
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
TARDEC’s Standardized Tests
and Evaluations
16 August 2012
Machine Characterization
• Winding Resistance Characterization
• Inductance Characterization
• Back EMF Measurement and
Characterization
• Rotor Inertia
• Spinning Losses (Iron Loss, Friction,
Windage) – Spin Down Test
Drive Performance Validation/Determination
• Maximum Electrical Speed
• Maximum Starting (Stall) Torque
• Torque Ripple
• Speed / Torque (Current) Envelope
Continuous
• Efficiency
• Speed vs. Power Envelope (Continuous)
Drive System Controllability
• Speed Regulation / Response
• Torque (Current) Response
• Voltage Regulation / Response
System Robustness
• Fault Tolerance
• Reliability Evaluation
• Conducted EMI Evaluation
Drive System Integration Practicability
• Safety Evaluation / Testing
• SWaP-C Evaluation
• Power Quality Compliance (MIL-PRF-
GCS600A(ARMY) / MIL-STD 704/1275)
• Current Harmonics
Drive System Technology Readiness Level
(TRL)
Traction Motor Servo Motor Generator Alternator DC/DC Converter
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Power Quality
Testing Scenarios
• 4.2.1 Voltage Regulation to Step Load. – All power sources shall be bench tested with a simulated load profile (equivalent to the worst
case operation of the system) to verify that electrical characteristics meet normal transient
performance.
– 19 → 88kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm
– 88 → 19kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm
– 0 → 50kW resistive load bank step + 19kW constant power (2700μF),1800rpm
• 3.1.1.11 Distortion Spectrum. – The distortion spectrum is defined as the maximum allowable limit of distortion expressed in
decibels above 1 microvolt as a function of frequency.
• 3.1.1.12 Distortion Factor. – The distortion factor is defined as the ratio of distortion to the steady state voltage.
– 19kW resistive load bank, 1800rpm
– 88kW resistive load bank, 1800rpm
– 50kW resistive load bank + 19kW constant power (2700μF), 1800rpm
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Experimental Results – Voltage
Transient Response
16 August 2012
3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.69 3.7 3.71 3.72
500
550
600
650
700
sec
Vbus
X: 3.646
Y: 554.2
565V
635V
725V
475V
3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 3.67 3.68 3.69 3.7 3.71 3.72
500
550
600
650
700
sec
Vbus
X: 3.646
Y: 653.4
635V
565V
475V
725V
4.2.1 Voltage Regulation to Step Load
19 → 87kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm 87 → 19kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Experimental Results - Steady
State
16 August 2012
Distortion Factor
0.0012
0.0015
0.0010
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
580
600
620
Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
580
600
620
Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
580
600
620
Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
Time (s)
101
102
103
104
105
106
80
100
120
140
dB
V
Distortion Spectrum, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
101
102
103
104
105
106
80
100
120
140
dB
V
Distortion Spectrum, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
101
102
103
104
105
106
80
100
120
140
dB
V
Distortion Spectrum, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
Frequency (Hz)
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
Time (s)
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
Time (s)
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 87.8kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09600
601
602
603
604
605Bus Voltage, 18.7kW Power Supply, 50.1kW Load Bank, 1800rpm
Time (s)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Machine Characterization
• Voltage Constant Ke = 0.253 Vll(pk) / rpm
– Negligible variation across speed (150rpm -
2700rpm) and temperature (30C, 46.7C,
63.3C, 80C)
• Phase resistance Rs = 10.7 mΩ
• Friction (combined Coulomb (static) and
viscous (dynamic))
16 August 2012
30 40 50 60 70 800.2
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.24
0.25
0.26
0.27
0.28
0.29
Ke vs. Temperature
Ke (
V_lin
e-l
ine (
pk)
/
rpm
)
Inlet Coolant Temp. (deg. C)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 300020
30
40
50
60
70
80No Load Torque vs. Speed
Torq
ue (
N m
)
Speed (rpm)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Electrical and Mechanical
Response Estimation
16 August 2012
1.87 1.88 1.89 1.9 1.91 1.92 1.93 1.94 1.95540
560
580
600
sec
volt
1.87 1.88 1.89 1.9 1.91 1.92 1.93 1.94 1.950
50
100
150
am
p
60ms
148A
32A
4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8550
565
580
595
610
volts
4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.81500
1600
1700
1800
1900
sec
rpm
Vdc
Speed
570ms
44rpm
19 → 87kW resistive load bank step, 1800rpm
Vdc
Idc
Voltage Transient: DV 48V and 60 msec
Speed Transient: D 44rpm and 570 msec
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Modeling Effort
16 August 2012
Objectives:
1) Evaluate the required amount of bus capacitance need for bus stability
2) Assess the total vehicle electrical system’s compliance to MIL-PRF-
GCS600A(ARMY)
Procedure:
1) From test data develop a model of the generator/controller system
2) Compare simulation results with experimental results to validate the model
3) Adjust generator/controller model’s dc-link and apply load transients
4) Incorporate the generator/controller model into a vehicle electrical system
model
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Modeling: Experimental Setup
16 August 2012
Models:
• Generator Controller – Voltage
– Current
• Power Stage – Inverter
– Dc-link
• Generator – dq frame of reference
– Speed input
• Loads – Switchable Resistance
– Constant Power
• Dynamometer – Speed Command
– Torque response
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Modeling: Experimental Validation
16 August 2012
Comparison between Experimental and Simulation Results: Voltage Transient
3.84 3.85 3.86 3.87 3.88 3.89 3.9
560
565
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
sec
Vbus
70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank
70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank(Simulation)
70kW Resistive Step Load
70kW Resistive Step Load +Constant
Power Load (Lab Power Supply)
3.84 3.85 3.86 3.87 3.88 3.89 3.9
560
565
570
575
580
585
590
595
600
sec
Vbus
70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank
70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank(Simulation)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Modeling: Evaluation of
Generator/Controller Capacitance
16 August 2012
3.84 3.845 3.85 3.855 3.86 3.865 3.87 3.875 3.88
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
sec
Vbus
70kW Step: Pow er Supply + Resistive Load Bank(Simulation)
70kW Step: 50% Reduced Capacitance, Pow er Supply +
Resistive Load Bank(Simulation)
3.84 3.845 3.85 3.855 3.86 3.865 3.87 3.875 3.88
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
sec
Vbus
70kW Step: Resistive Load Bank (Simulation)
70kW Step: 50% Reduced Capacitance, Resistive Load Bank(Simulation)
Comparison between 100% and 50% dc-link capacitance: Voltage Transient
70kW Resistive Step Load
70kW Resistive Step Load +Constant
Power Load (Lab Power Supply)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Modeling: Simulating a Vehicle
Load Cycle
16 August 2012
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
200
400
600
800
sec
V,A
mp
s
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
500
1000
1500
2000
rpm
Speed
Vdc
Idc
70kW Step Load
148 A
1700 rpm
600 V
1000 rpm
Passive Rectification Active Rectification
Simulation of a Vehicle’s Electrical System – Generator Startup
– Transition between Passive and Active Rectification
– Voltage and Speed Transients
– Generator Controller Current Limits
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Conclusions
• Compliance verification with MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY)
– Established the laboratory capability to validate the results
• M&S tools for power generation system analysis and
optimization
– Characterization of a black-box power generation system, and
model development
– Evaluation of system response with varying DC-link capacitance
values and EMI filter parameters, controller gains, and driveline
inertia
16 August 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Future Work
• Combine component models with those of an engine and
high-voltage bus architecture to assess power quality at
the vehicle level
• FY13 power generation system SIL and vehicle
integration
• Optimization of the bus capacitance for power
generation systems
• Vehicle high-voltage bus capacitance allocation
16 August 2012