35
Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs 1 Ross Koenig, AVP Budget & Financial Planning Rochester Institute of Technology September 22, 2014

Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Evaluating the Financial

Contribution of Academic Programs

1

Ross Koenig, AVP Budget & Financial Planning

Rochester Institute of Technology

September 22, 2014

Page 2: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

About RIT . . .

2

Upstate NY University with 13,600 FTE

students across 9 colleges:

Computing Sciences

Engineering

Imaging Arts & Sciences

Applied Science & Technology

Business

Science

National Technical Institute for the Deaf

Liberal Arts

Health Sciences & Technology

Page 3: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

About RIT Budget . . .

3

Budget is managed centrally:

Tuition revenue budgeted / managed centrally

Expense budget for Financial Aid to manage unfunded

student aid awards

Colleges & divisions manage to an net expense budget

(some ancillary revenues, but not tuition)

Budgets are permanent / Annual cycle to request

incremental funding

Pooled employee benefit rates for budgeting

Page 4: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Financial Analysis Math

4

What is 2 x 2?

Mathematician

Statistician

Accountant (Financial Analyst)

Page 5: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

RIT History of Program Level Analysis

5

“Academic Cost Model” – bottom line

financial result by academic department

Allocated revenues & expenses to “academic

department” with some sophistication

Cost exchanges between colleges for “service”

courses (e.g., physics for engineering students)

Referenced by Senior Management

Page 6: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

New Call for Program Analysis

6

Provost initiated “Academic Program Review”

Five-Year rotational look at all program offerings

Each is evaluated on Five Dimensions:

Unique Features

Marketability

Quality & Accomplishments

Vision and Long-Term Viability

Financial Viability How to measure?

Page 7: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Goals for new APR Cost Model:

7

1. Transparent relation to RIT’s published/audited

financial statements – ties to our SOA

2. Reasonably quick to prepare – table driven

3. At program level (e.g., both BS and MS in

Electrical Engineering)

4. Includes all colleges (NTID not included in the

former model)

Page 8: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Relationships on Campus

8

Academic Departments

Students

Faculty

Specific Course Sections

Academic Programs

Depts

create

curricula

Students register

for course sections

Faculty

assigned to

course

sections

Depts

hire/deploy

faculty

Students

matriculate

into

programs

Courses

Page 9: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Common Denominator?

9

Student Credit Hours (SCH)

SCH can tie or relate:

Faculty to course sections

Students to course sections

Departments to course sections

Can sum SCH in multiple ways:

All courses delivered by an Academic Discipline

All students matriculated in a given program

Page 10: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

SCH Data – Starting Point

10

2D matrix of all credit hours attempted in the

academic year.

Horizontal Dimension = Course Discipline:

ACCT, MATH, CHEM, PHYS, ECON, etc.

(n = 177)

Vertical Dimension = Academic Plan:

ACCT-BS, MECE-MS, COMPSCI-BS, etc.

(n=257)

Page 11: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

ENGL MATH PHYS MECE CSCI TOTAL

MATH-BS UG 337 1,558 312 - 389 2,596

MECE-BS UG 1,378 2,480 1,654 7,303 965 13,780

MECE-MS GR - - 73 1,312 73 1,458

PHYS-BS UG 216 288 1,116 - 180 1,800

COMPSI-BS UG 1,675 2,198 837 - 5,756 10,466

COMPSI-MS GR - 186 93 - 1,581 1,860

TOTAL 3,606 6,710 4,085 8,615 8,944 31,960

SCH Data – Example University

11

Academic Plans Course Disciplines

Page 12: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Where to Start on the Financials?

12

Start with Everything!

All SOA accounts from our trial balance

33,970 SOA Account combinations for FY13

Our G/L Account Structure (24-digit):

Entity (2)

Department (5)

Object Code (5)

Functional Expense Code (2)

Project (5)

Program (5 – reserved)

Page 13: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step 1: Parse TB Data to Department

13

Table of all G/L Departments (n=2,655)

assigned to groups, either:

College/Division:

COE, COS, StudAff, F&A, etc.

College/Division + Department:

COE/MECH, COS/MATH, etc.

Use the table to assign each SOA account to

a department group

Page 14: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step 1a: Academic “Cost” Department

14

Course disciplines do not line up neatly with our G/L

departments. For example:

Anthropology (ANTH) and Sociology (SOCI)

courses taught within the same department in

College of Liberal Arts

All foreign languages are taught within the same

department

Introduced the concept of a “Cost Department” to

combine the credit hours across the course disciplines.

Page 15: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step 2: Account Overrides

15

Re-categorize selected accounts:

Depreciation

Interest

Utilities

Tuition Revenue

Student Aid

Data table for Object Code overrides, for example:

If Object = 50000, then include in Tuition Revenue pool,

irrespective of department.

If Object = 86900, then include in Building Depreciation

pool, irrespective of department.

Page 16: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step 2a: Other Account Overrides

16

Four additional account code

segment override tables:

Project (e.g., Gift, Endowment)

Project/Object

Department/Object

Entity

Page 17: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step 3: Reconcile

17

Tie out the sum of revenue &

cost pools to the operating

change in net assets

Lends transparency to the model

Increases buy-in by community

Page 18: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Resulting Revenue/Cost Pools

18

College/Cost Depts (77)

College (9)

Gross Tuition

Unfunded Student Aid

Equipment Deprec

Plant Deprec

Interest

Student Fees

Endowment Activities

Gift Activities

Facilities Expenses

Utilities

Academic Affairs

Non-Academic Div’s (5)

Research Admin

Auxiliaries

Page 19: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Secondary Analyses

19

Tuition Revenue and Student Aid – Used SIS data

(by student) to summarize by academic plan

Faculty Salary Analysis - Separate faculty salary

expense between graduate & undergraduate courses

Equipment Depreciation Assignment

Space Cost Analysis to distribute “O&M” cost pool

(= building depreciation, utilities, interest, and

facilities costs)

Page 20: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Remaining Revenue/Cost Pools

20

College/Cost Depts (77)

College (9)

Gross Tuition

Student Aid

Student Fees

Endowment Activities

Gift Activities

Academic Affairs

Non-Academic Div’s (5)

Research Admin

Auxiliaries

Page 21: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Step-Down Methodology

21

Cost Pool Allocation Basis

Research Administration Sponsored Program

Revenues

Non-Academic Divisions and

Other Cost Pools

Combination of Credit Hours

generated and Direct Expense

College Expenses (Deans) Direct Expense of

departments within college

Academic Affairs Expenses Direct Expense of all

academic departments

Student Affairs Expenses Credit Hours generated by

academic department

Page 22: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Pools We Are Left With

22

Gross Tuition Revenue (by Plan)

Unfunded Student Aid (by Plan)

All other expenses (net of other

revenues) fully-allocated to course

discipline

Page 23: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

A B C=A+B D E F G H I J K= Sum(C:J)

Faculty

Salaries Other

Total

Direct

Equip

Deprec O&M

Spon

Res

Non-

Acad Div College

Acad

Affairs

Student

Affairs Summary

ENGL 320 30 350 13 74 2 291 51 100 139 1,020

MATH 1,035 68 1,103 19 74 5 610 84 205 265 2,365

PHYS 1,035 208 1,243 13 111 5 484 84 196 164 2,300

MECE 2,662 656 3,318 156 1,075 75 979 296 620 341 6,860

CSCI 3,241 599 3,840 91 1,038 72 1,016 329 770 354 7,510

Instruction Subtotal 8,293 1,561 9,854 292 2,372 159 3,380 844 1,891 1,263 20,055

Stud Affairs 781 781 32 297 2 151 - - (1,263) -

Acad Affairs 1,743 1,743 13 37 2 96 - (1,891) -

College Admin 650 650 6 37 - 151 (844) -

Non-Acad Div's 2,730 2,730 91 927 - (3,748) -

Endow/Gift Activity 30 30 - - - (30) -

Spons Res Admin 120 120 6 37 (163) -

Utilities 300 300 - (300) -

Interest 600 600 - (600) -

Bldg Deprec 850 850 - (850) -

Facilities Exp 1,750 1,750 207 (1,957) -

Equip Deprec 647 647 (647) -

Gross Tuition (30,254) (30,254) (30,254)

Unfunded Aid 9,634 9,634 9,634

Non-Instruct Subtotal - (10,419) (10,419) (292) (2,372) (159) (3,380) (844) (1,891) (1,263) (20,620)

Total University 8,293 (8,858) (565) - - - - - - - (565)

Cost Pool Step-Down Example

23

Page 24: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Academic Cost Responsibility “Tiers”

24

Calculate UG and GR cost per credit

hour generated at three levels:

College = Deans expenses and below

Academic Affairs = College

responsibility plus Provost Expenses

Full Cost = AA responsibility plus all

institutional overhead

Page 25: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Cost Pools – Example U - $ 000’s

25

Total Costs - $ 000's ENGL MATH PHYS MECE CSCI TOTAL

College UG 490$ 1,200$ 1,390$ 4,080$ 4,150$ 11,310$

GR -$ 85$ 66$ 840$ 1,220$ 2,211$

490$ 1,285$ 1,456$ 4,920$ 5,370$ 13,521$

Acad Affrs UG 590$ 1,400$ 1,580$ 4,600$ 4,770$ 12,940$

GR -$ 90$ 72$ 940$ 1,370$ 2,472$

590$ 1,490$ 1,652$ 5,540$ 6,140$ 15,412$

Full Cost UG 1,020$ 2,250$ 2,200$ 5,700$ 5,890$ 17,060$

GR -$ 115$ 100$ 1,160$ 1,620$ 2,995$

1,020$ 2,365$ 2,300$ 6,860$ 7,510$ 20,055$

Page 26: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

ENGL MATH PHYS MECE CSCI TOTAL

Credit Hours UG 3,606 6,524 3,919 7,303 7,290 28,642

GR - 186 166 1,312 1,654 3,318

3,606 6,710 4,085 8,615 8,944 31,960

Cost/CrHr

College UG 136$ 184$ 355$ 559$ 569$ 395$

GR 457$ 398$ 640$ 738$ 666$

Acad Affrs UG 164$ 215$ 403$ 630$ 654$ 452$

GR 484$ 434$ 716$ 828$ 745$

Full Cost UG 283$ 345$ 561$ 781$ 808$ 596$

GR 618$ 602$ 884$ 979$ 903$

Cost/SCH – Example

26

Physics College UG Cost = $1,390 K

Page 27: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

ENGL MATH PHYS MECE CSCI TOTAL

CrHr Consumed 1,378 2,480 1,654 7,303 965 13,780

College Cost/CrHr 136$ 184$ 355$ 559$ 569$ 425$

Full Cost 187,249$ 456,162$ 586,645$ 4,080,000$ 549,348$ 5,859,404$

Acad Affr Cost/CrHr 164$ 215$ 403$ 630$ 654$ 483$

Full Cost 225,463$ 532,189$ 666,833$ 4,600,000$ 631,420$ 6,655,905$

Full Cost/CrHr 283$ 345$ 561$ 781$ 808$ 628$

Full Cost 389,784$ 855,303$ 928,502$ 5,700,000$ 779,678$ 8,653,267$

Cost of a “Program” (MECE-BS)

27

Page 28: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Bottom Line for MECE-BS

28

FT PT Total $/SCH

Student Headcount 400 20 420

# SCH 13,600 180 13,780

Tuition Rate 30,000$ 1,200$

Gross Tuition K$ 12,000$ 216$ 12,216$ 887$

Student Aid 33% 3,960$ -$ 3,960$ 287$

Net Tuition K$ 8,040$ 216$ 8,256$ 599$

College Responsibility Costs - K$ 5,859$ 425$

Net Result - K$ 2,397$ 174$

Academic Affairs Responsibility Costs - K$ 6,656$ 483$

Net Result - K$ 1,600$ 116$

Fully Allocated Costs - K$ 8,653$ 628$

Net Result - k$ (397)$ (29)$

Page 29: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Gross Aid Net College Acad Affr Full College Acad Affr Full

MATH-BS UG 2,443$ 888$ 1,555$ 664$ 770$ 1,122$ 891$ 785$ 433$

MECE-BS UG 12,216$ 3,960$ 8,256$ 5,859$ 6,656$ 8,653$ 2,397$ 1,600$ (397)$

MECE-MS GR 1,751$ 432$ 1,319$ 923$ 1,032$ 1,275$ 396$ 287$ 44$

PHYS-BS UG 1,800$ 648$ 1,152$ 581$ 665$ 932$ 571$ 487$ 220$

COMPSI-BS UG 9,871$ 3,168$ 6,703$ 4,206$ 4,849$ 6,352$ 2,498$ 1,854$ 351$

COMPSI-MS GR 2,172$ 538$ 1,634$ 1,288$ 1,440$ 1,720$ 346$ 195$ (85)$

TOTAL 30,254$ 9,634$ 20,620$ 13,521$ 15,412$ 20,055$ 7,099$ 5,208$ 565$

Tuition Cost Net Result

Bottom Line Summary - Example

29

Page 30: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Program Comparison - Example

30

ENGL MATH PHYS MECE CSCI TOTAL

Consumption of CrHr

MATH-BS 13% 60% 12% 0% 15% 100%

MECE-BS 10% 18% 12% 53% 7% 100%

Full Cost / CrHr 283$ 345$ 561$ 781$ 808$

Program Weighted Average Cost / CrHr

MATH-BS 37$ 207$ 67$ -$ 121$ 432$

MECE-BS 28$ 62$ 67$ 414$ 57$ 628$

Page 31: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

RIT’s Learnings - Process

31

Focus on your educational mission

Analyze before complicating your model

with other suggestions, e.g.:

Contact vs. Credit Hours

Expenses funded with gifts

Allocation of Spons Pgms Admin

Page 32: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

RIT’s Learnings - Process

32

Start with disaggregated data and

summarize yourself

Be intentional / specific / constant

about what “academic program” means

Course Disciplines <> General Ledger

Departments

Page 33: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

RIT’s Learnings - Results

33

The 80/20 rule applies

We have some small programs, but

size is not the only relevant factor

Net Tuition / SCH not so different

between programs

Page 34: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

RIT’s Learnings - Results

34

PhD programs might need to be

evaluated differently

Full vs. Marginal Cost - Consider

multiple levels of responsibility

Page 35: Evaluating the Financial Contribution of Academic Programs

Wrap Up

35

Questions?