5
Annals cifGlaciology 25 199 7 © Int ern ational Gl aciologica l Society Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations KE ITH M. HINES,i DAVID H. BROMWI CH,2 R. I. CU LLATH ER i i Polar I V1eteorology GroujJ, By rd Polar R esearch Cen le1; T he Ohio State University, Colum bus, OH 43210 , US.A. 2Atmospheric Sciences Program, T he O hio Stale Universil) l, Columblls, OH 4321 0, US. A. ABSTRACT. Th e perf o rm ance of an explicit cl o ud ph ys ics parameteri za ti on is exa m- ined with simul ations of high so uth e rn la titud e w int er cl im ate usin g a version of th e Pe nn sy lva ni a State University/Na ti onal Ce nter for Atm ospheric Research Mesoscale Model, version 4. Th e r es ults reveal th at there are thr ee moist phys ics regim es in the vert- ica l over the elevated interior oC Ant arc ti ca : the very cold upp er tropos ph er e, th e rel a- ti vely warm middl e tr opos ph ere a nd th e co ld bo und ary l aye r. De fi ciencies for these layers include excessive cl o ud ice in th e upp er trop os ph er e, excessive cl oud ice in th e in- version layer n ea r th e ice s urf ace, overly wa rm te mp era tur es in the lower tr op os ph er e, overly cold temp era tur es in the upp er tr opos ph ere a nd excess ive downwa rd longwave ra- dia ti on at the Ea rth's s urf ace. Three se nsitivity exp e rim ents were perf or med to investi ga te possible improvement s in the cloud parameteri zation. Th e r es ults indi ca te that a redu c- ti on of th e numerous cl oud co nd ensa ti on nuclei, while redu cing some e rr ors, a pp ea rs to be insuffieient to improve th e simulation. A redu ction in th e excessive cloud ice in th e upp er tr opo sphere signifi ca ntly improves the simulati on of upp e r-tr opos ph eric te mp era tur e. INTRODUCTION -5 c:: o E 2 ...... § I - // / I I I I I I I I --- ....J I I I I I ,' PME (ECMWF) Evapora ti on (W ETJUN) ·75 ·70 ·65 Latitude ·60 Clouds play a key role in the regula ti on of global climat e (e.g. Ramanathan and other s, 1989). Rel ativel y little is known, however, about the cl oud cover a nd el oud ph ys ics in high so uthern latitudes (Stone, 1993). Existing studi es of the regional hydr ologic cycl e reveal unique f eatur es, includ- ing th e slow ice acc umul a ti on over int erior Ant arcti ca by "cl ea r sky" precipitation with out the presence of visible clouds (Bromwich, 1988). Th e proper tr eatm ent of cl oud and cloud-radiative properti es is o ft en a serious obsta cl e for num cri ca l modeling studi es of tr opi ca l a nd mid-l a titud e regions, which are much be LLer observed than the polar regions. Not s urpri singly, many ad va nced global climate models poorly simul ate the hydrol ogic cycl e of the Ant arctic region ( Ch en and other s, 1995). For exa mple, the Na ti onal Cent er for Atmos ph eric Research (NC AR ) Co mmunit y Clim ate Model version 2 (C CM 2) improp erly simulates highly persistent, deep cl ouds over the interior of the Ant- ar ctic ice sheet (T zeng and other s, 1 994). Cloud ph ys ics parameteri za ti ons for high-resolution mesoscale model s, often d es igned for wa rm er tr opi ca l a nd mid-la titude cl imates, ca n also pe rf o rm poo rl y in the polar regions. Th e explicit mois tur e phys ics parameteri za tion (H sie a nd Anth es, 1984) in the Pe nn sylvania State U ni ver- sity ( PSU )/ NCAR Mesoscale Model version 4 ( MM4) has difficulty repr ese nting well the ph ys ics of Ar cti c str atus (Pinto and Curr y, 199 7). Furth ermor e, Hin es and others ( 19 97) fo und improp er simula ti on of Ant arc ti c winter clouds by MM4. Th eir modeled zona ll y a\ 'e raged pr ecipita- tion minu s evaporation ( PME ) and evapora ti on durin g Jun e 19 88 are displ ayed in Fig ur e l. Simulated evapora- tion/sublimation is relatively sma ll south of 70 0 S. Fi g ur e I also shows the PME deri ve d by Bromwich a nd others Fig. 1. Zona lry averaged j mcipitation- evapomtion (cm mon th ) dllTing J une 1988JoT WETJ UN (thi ck line) and de rivedfiom I he E Ci \1WF analyses (dashed line) and zon - ally averaged evapora tio n (t iz illlin e, cm mo nth- I) Jor r VE T- J UN 282 (19 95) fro lTl the wea ther analyses pro du ced by the Europ ea n Ce ntr e for Medium -Ran ge vV ea thcr Forecasts (ECMvVF). Between 65 ° S and 70 ° S, the PME is about 3 clTllllonth I for bo th the model and analyses. From 70 ° S to 80° S, modcled PME is roughly 0. 2 to 0.5 cm mo nth I greater th an the cl erived PME. Th e relative err or, however, is high o nl y for the mountainou s inland region between about 78 ° S and 90 0 S. An acc ur ate depiction of the ice acculllula ti on ove r Ant arc ti ca is criti ca l for studi es of the change in global sea level. Th e goal of this paper is to stud y the defi ciencies in the parameteri zati on of the hydr ologic cycl e at high so uth e rn la titud es as a step towards improved parameteri za ti ons that

Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 © International Glaciological Society

Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations

K E ITH M. HINES, i DAVID H . BROMWICH,2 R. I. C ULLATHE R i

i Polar IV1eteorology GroujJ, By rd Polar Research Cenle1; T he Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, US.A. 2Atmospheric Sciences Program, T he Ohio Stale Universil)l, Columblls, OH 43210, US. A.

ABSTRACT. The performance of a n explicit cloud physics parameteri zation is exam­ined with simula tions of high southern la titude winter cl ima te using a version of the Pennsylvani a Sta te U nive rsity/Na ti ona l Cent er for Atmospheri c Resea rch M esosca le Model, version 4. The results reveal that there a re three moist physics regimes in the vert­ical over the eleva ted interior oC Anta rctica: the ve ry co ld upper troposphere, the rel a­ti vely warm middle troposphere a nd the co ld bounda ry layer. Defi ciencies for th ese layers include excessive cloud ice in the upper troposphere, excessive cloud ice in the in­version layer nea r the ice surface, overly wa rm temperatures in the lower troposphere, overl y cold temperatures in the upper troposphere a nd excess ive downward longwave ra­di ation at the Ea rth's surface. Three sensitivity experiments we re performed to investigate possible improvements in the cloud parameteri zation. The results indicate tha t a reduc­tion of the numerous cloud condensation nuclei, whil e reducing some errors, appea rs to be insuffieient to improve the simulation. A reduction in the excessive cloud ice in the upper troposphere significantly improves the simulation of upper-tropospheric temperature.

INTRODUCTION

-5 c:: o E 2 ...... §

I

- ///

I

I I

I

I I

I

I--- ....J

I I

I I

I

,'PME (ECMWF)

Evaporation (W ETJUN)

·75 ·70 ·65

Latitude ·60

Clouds play a key rol e in the regulation of global climate

(e.g. R amana tha n and others, 1989). Rel atively little is known, however, about the cloud cover and eloud physics in high southern la titudes (Stone, 1993). Existing studies of the regional hydrologic cycle reveal unique features, includ­ing the slow ice accumulation over interior Anta rctica by

"clear sky" precipitation without the presence of visible

clouds (Bromwich, 1988). The proper treatment of cloud and cloud-radiative properties is often a serious obstacl e for numcrical modeling studies of tropical and mid-l atitude regions, which a re much beLLer observed than the pola r regions. Not surpri singly, many advanced globa l climate

models poorly simul ate the hydrologic cycle of the Anta rctic region (Chen and others, 1995). For example, the Nationa l Center for Atmospheric Research (NC AR ) Community Climate Model version 2 (CCM2) improperly simul ates highly persistent, deep clouds over the interior of the Ant­arctic ice sheet (T zeng a nd others, 1994).

C loud physics parameteri zations for high-resolution mesoscale model s, often designed for warmer tropical and mid-latitude cl ima tes, can a lso perform poorl y in the polar regions. The explicit moisture physics parameterization (H sie a nd Anthes, 1984) in the Pennsylvania Sta te Univer­sity (PSU )/NCAR M esoscale M odel version 4 (MM4) has difficult y representing well the physics of Arctic stratus (Pinto a nd Curry, 1997). Furthermore, Hines a nd others (1997) found improper simulation of Antarctic winter clouds by MM4. Their modeled zonall y a\'eraged prec ipita­tion minus evapora tion (PME) and evaporation during June 1988 a re displayed in Figure l. Simul ated evapora­tion/sublimation is relatively small south of 700 S. Figure I also shows the PME derived by Bromwich and others

Fig. 1. Zonalry averaged jmcipitation- evapomtion (cm month ) dllTing J une 1988JoT WETJUN (thick line) and derivedfiom Ihe ECi\1W F analyses (dashed line) and zon ­ally averaged evaporation (tiz illline, cm month- I) Jor r VE T­

J UN

282

(1995) frolTl the weather a na lyses produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range vVeathcr Forecasts (ECMvVF). Between 65° S and 70° S, the PME is about 3 clTllllonth I

for both the model and ana lyses. From 70° S to 80° S, modcled PME is roughly 0.2 to 0.5 cm month I greater than

the clerived PME. The relative error, however, is high only for the mountainous inland region between about 78° S and 900 S. An accurate depiction of the ice acc ulllulation over Anta rctica is critical for studies of the change in g loba l sea level. The goal of this paper is to study the deficiencies in the pa rameteri zati on of the hydrologic cycle a t high southern latitudes as a step towa rds improved parameteri zations that

Page 2: Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

ca n more acc urately depict th e regiona l clima te a nd globa l wa ter bala nce.

MODEL DESCRIPTION

Fo r the simula tions desc ribed in thi s paper, \Ve use th e high­reso lution mesoscaiC' model used by Hincs a nd o th ers (1997). T hi s model is a modifi ed version of th e widely used MM4

(A l1lhes a nd o thers, 1987), a three-d imensiona l (3-D ), hydro­

sta ti c, primiti\"C-equa ti on model. The key longwave radi a­tion a nd turbulent boundar y-l ayer pa ra meteri za ti ons were modifi ed to si lTlLll ate better the co ld, pe rsistent ka taba tic wind s th a t d ra in orr th e high ice terra in (Hines a nd o thers, 1995). L ongwave radia ti on is computed by the el1ieient g ray­

body method of Cerni a nd Pa ri sh (1984) fo r dry cloud-free simul a ti ons. A rad ia tio n sch eme simila r to tha t of CC~Il is used for moist sim ulati ons. H ori zonta l resolution is 100 km in a square doma in, 7900 km wide on each side, centered a t the South Pole. Thc grid ex tends to 4 1.5 S at th e corners. T he vcrtica l disc reti zati on consists of 15 er levels with a

100 hPa top fo r dry runs a nd 16 er leve ls with a 10 h Pa top fo r moist run s. Ini t ia l conditi ons a nd ti me-\·a r ying bound­ary conditi ons a re interpola ted from EC~rWF a na lvses fo r June 1988. This win ter month has been prev iously studi ed by Hines a nd othe rs (1995, 1997).

M oist physics arc simul a ted with the ex plicit moisture

scheme (H sie and A nthes, 1984) m odifi ed for treatment of

ice a ncl snow a t temperatures < 273.1 5 K (Dudhia, 1989). A simila r m oist physics scheme is em ployed by Ga ll ce (1995) in hi s simul a tion of mesocyclones O\"C r the Ross Sea. The exp li cit moisture scheme includes prognostic equa tions [o r the local m ass frac ti on, in m ass of wa ter substa nce per

mass of moist a tmosphere, of wa ter \·apor, cloud a ncl preci­

pita ti on. In the scheme of H sie a nd Anthes (1984), processes th a t

convert vapor to clo ud include initi a lization of c loud pa rt­icles a nd deposition o n to cloud pa rticles. C loud moisture becomes precipitat io n by autoconversion a nd acc re tion.

Precipit a tion can be lost (gained ) to (from ) vapor by eva­

poration (condensation ) or sublim ati on. R ain a ncl snow fa ll o ut of th e a tmosphere at a calcul a ted terminal velocit y. At tempera tu res < 273. 15 K , th e condensa ti on nuclei concen­tra tion, n e, (a number de nsity ) impacts ice pa rticle concen­tra ti on. Duclhia (1989) obta ins n e by th e equa tion:

'ne = n e (0) cxp [0.6(273.1 5 - T)]I P (1)

where nc(O) is 0.01 m :' , T is temperature (K ) a nd p is a ir density. By thi s equa ti on, ne inc reases by abo ut 20 o rders of magnitude as th e temperature fa ll s from 273 K to 193 K. The pa ra meteri zed nuclei concentra ti on appears to be

excessive a t realistic temperatures for the intensely cold a ir

in th e uppe r tropos phere a nd near the E as t Anta rctic pla­

teau surface. The ini tializati on a ncl a utoconversion of ice pa rticl es arc bo th linea rly related to th e nuclei concentra­ti on. \\'hen th e a tmosphere is supersatura ted with respect to ice, initia li zati on, Pn is given by the equa tion:

(2)

where !lfo is 10 12 kg, qe is e1 0ud m ass frac ti on, an cl fi t is the timestep. Autoconve rsion, P HC' is given by the equa ti on:

Pnc = M A X [qe - qcril) / fi t , O] (3)

where qcri1 (kg/kg) is 9.4 x 10 12 kg ne. Thus, a t col cl Anta rc­

tic tempera tures, parameteri zed clouds fo r the explicit

moisture scheme will consist of numerous, ye t sm a ll ice pa rt-

Hines and olhers: Evaluating Anlarctic mesoscale simulations

icles. Th e m oist radi a tion scheme is impacted by th e clo ud mass frac tion, but not directl y by th e c lo ud pa rticle size

determined by t he ex plicit m oisture schem e. Through Equa­

tion (3) the sm all ice pa rticle size is hi ghl y unfavorable 10

a utoconversion of clo ud to precipita tion a t yery low temper­a tures.

RESULTS

The impac t of th e m oist-physics package can be evalua ted by com paring simila r mesosca le simul a ti ons with a nd with­out th e hyd rologic cyc le of the a tmosphere. Hines a nd oth ers (1997) conducted such a n a na lysis fo r hi gh southern

la titudes. Their simula ti ons of June 1988 with cloucl- free

conditi o ns a nd with m oist physics a re hereby refe rred to as DRYj U~ a nd W E1JU N, respec ti\"ely. Compared to DRY­J U N, W E1]UN was fo und to have a deep er circumpo la r troug h surround ing A nta rctica a nd sig nificantl y increased geopotenti a l heights a t 500 hPa o\'er A nta rctica. The m oist

physics parameterizati on a ppears to have improved th e

m oclel cl imatology over the Southern O cea n a ncl cleoTaded " it over th e interi o r of Anta rctica.

The impac t of the m oist-phys ics para meteri zati o n is dem onstra ted by Figure 2, which di splays \"C rt·ica l profil es of tempera ture a\·e raged forJune 1988. These pro fil es a t th e

South Pole a re representat ive of cond itions ove r the interi o r

of Anta rcti ca. The pro fi le fo r the EC MWF a nalyses has a coa rse vertica l resolution consisting of seven sta ncla rcll e\ ·el s. Consequently, the strong A nta rctic inversion is no t well represented in th e analyses. The cloud- free DRYJU~ rep­resents the tempera ture profil e reasonabl y well th rougho ut

th e troposphere. A st rong inversion is seen for both DRY­

J UN a nd WETJU i\'. With th e m oist physics in WE1JU :J, however, th e tempera ture a t the bound a r y layer lOp is abo ut 5 K wa rmer th a n tha t of DRYJU N. L ongwa\ "C ra dia ti on from thick clo uds in \vETJU~ is directl y rela tcd to th e increased tempera ture in the lower troposphere.

l00r-----~ __ ,---~----,---~----~----

200

Fig. 2. Verlical lemperatll re ( K ) pnifiLes al the South PoleJor J une 1988.from ECMT I·F analyses ( dashed line ), DRl ~ ]e' · ( thin lil1e ) and TI 'ET]C Y" ( thick line ).

In DRYJUN, th e rela ti vel y co ld 211.4 K surface temper­a ture a t thc South Pole is m a inta ined la rge ly by radi a ti\"C heat loss as o utgoing long \,·a \"e radi a ti on, 111.3 \\. m ~, exceecl s incoming 10ngwa\"C radia ti on by 50.2 \V m 2 By

contra t, a t the So uth Pole in \ VETJU N, the rela ti\·ely wa rm

227.2 K surface tempera tu rc is influencecl by the ba lance a t

283

Page 3: Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

Hilles and oLhers: EvaluaLing AnLarcLic mesoscale silllulaLiolls

the surface between outgoing radi ation, 149.5 ' V m ~ and incoming radi a tion, 149.5 \V m 2. H eat loss into the colder ice sheet ma intains the inversion in the lowcr atmosphere for\VETJU~. The temperature dilTerence between simul a­ti ons is reversed in the upper troposphere, where \ VETJU N is up to 16 K co lder than DRYJ Ul\' a nd up to 12 K colder than the EC MWF a na lyses. Outgoing longwave radiati on from the tops or relatively dense clouds ce rta inly contributes to the low temperatures in the upper troposphere in \VET­J U t'\.

Evidence fo r surpri singly thi ck, persistent clouds ovcr the high interior is displayed in Figure 3, showing the aver­

age o\-cr longitude a nd time of vertica ll y integrated water­vapor a nd cloud mass in centimeters ofliquid water equi va­lent depth for WETJU N. North of 75° S, \'erti calI y inte­g ra ted water vapor is sli ghtl y large r (by about 0.05 cm) tha n tha t of the EC ?\!\ VF ana lyses. Over interior Anta rct­ica, wa ter va por is excessive in the model res ults. as simula ted water-vapor mass fracti on is as much as double tha t of the analyses for latitudes south of 75 S. The obvious reason (or the excess vapor is the increased saturation vapor pressure with rela tivel y wa rm temperature in the lower and middle troposphere. Fig ure 3 a lso shows th at, O\'C r the Southern O cean, clouds mass is rel atively small compared to water-vapor mass. Near the South Pole, however, cloud mass is the same order of mag nitude as water-vapor mass. The surpri sing and clea rl y spurious res ult of WETJ UN is tha t th e max imum cloud mass in a vertica l eolumn is not located over the rela tively warm northern sections of the grid . R ather, the maximum is located over the eleva ted ter­rain of interio r Anta rctica.

0.8 r------~---..,---__,_---~--"

0.7 f- .................. i···· .. ···........ j ........ · ........ · .. · .. · .. ·t .......... ··· ...... ·· + ...... · ........ · ...... ·+ .. ·j'·f I

s ~ 0.6

.fj fir' 0.5 f- .................... i .. ··· .. · .. ·· .............. ·i· .... · .. · ....... ·· .......... i .......... ·· .. · .... · .... + ............... 1· .... / + .............. · .. ··1 "tl "tl ' :; 0.4 f- ....................... : .............................. ; .......... - .............. + ........... · ...... ···+/ ·-.,:· ............ + .. · ........ · ........ · .... 1

g ~ 0.3 f- .................. + ................... ; ........................... , ......... /- ,c .......................... , ........ ..

~ :> '5 0.2 <T

W

0.1

0.0.90 ·75

Latitude ·70

Fig. 3. Liquid waLer equivalenl delJliz ( cm) of ;::ollal~JI aver­aged waLeI' vapor and cloud mass ill a verLical column durillg J une 1988 for r I E TJ UN (waLeI' vapor, thick line; doud mass, Lhin line ) a11d Lhe ECil llJ1F analyses (waLeI' v([por, dashed line).

Fig ure 4 di splays the vertica l distribution of atmospheric moisture a t the South Pole fo r WETJU N. Based upon extrcmes in the vapor a nd temperature profiles, it is cO I1\'e­ni ent to sepa rate the troposphere into three regimes: the upper troposphere, the middle troposphere a nd the bound­a ry layer. Wa ter-\ 'apor concentrati on h as minima at the

rel ati vely co ld surface a nd upper troposphere, and a max­imum for the relative ly warm layer above the boundary layer. Cloud-ice concentrati on, by contras t, is relati ve ly high at the surface a nd in the upper troposphere. It appea rs that

284

l00~--~~----~------------~------------, I I I

200f-' .. ·· .... ··· ............ ··· .... · .. · .... · ........ ···, .... · .... · ... · .... · .. · .. · ... ·· ...... ···· ... ······· ... 't .... ·_ ........ ··· ..... · ........ ·· ... ··· .. · ..... ·i

Cloud

~ 300 f- · .... \ .. · ......... · ............ -.. · .. ,~c-..... ·-..... · .. · ...... ·-.................... · .. f t ..... _·-..... ·_· .. _· .. · .. ·-..... · ... ... «l

~ ~ 400 1- ............... 1 .................................... +_ .................................. :'" ;:l

'" '" ~ ~ 50o l- .... · .. · .... · .. ····! .............. · ...... ·· .... ·····i ........................... ··.-....... 7' ......... + ........ -.c~

600 ~ ............. _.\I'.r~'?f1ta~():,, ;.. ...................... t .......... ··l........................ . \

10.5

kgkglair

Fig. -l. Verticallm!Jdes ofLhe l17 assJracLioll ( kg kg I) of waLer vapoT ( th in fin e), cloud ( Ih ick line) and precipilation ( dashed Line) at the Soulh PoleIor r VET]UJV

longwa\'e radia tive coo ling at the top of the thick cloud layer in the uppe r troposphere contributes to the cold upper tro­posphere seel1 in Figure 2. The moisture stored in fa lling ice precipita ti on is at least an order of magnitude sma ll er than

that stored in cloud ice within the troposphere. The differ­ence is t\\'o orders of magnitude at the model's lo\\'est le\-c l.

Figure --I- a lso shows that between 300 a nd 200 hPa, a tmospheric moisture sto red in clouds is one o r two orders of magnitude la rge r than that stored in wa ter va por. The modeled cloud densit y within this regi me appea rs to be greatl y excessive, a lthough the ac tua l cloud density is not well kn ow n for thi s region. Stone (1993) estimated winter­time cloud-ice concentra ti on to be 3 x 10 7 to 6 x 10 (i kg m :l

from radi ative measurements at the South Pole. Simply by di viding Stone's estimate by the atmospheric densit y, which is close to 1 kg m :l at the top of the im'e rsion, \I'C can com­pa re his numbers with the cloud-mass frac tion di splayed in Figure 4. This indicates that cloud ice frac ti on is a n order of mag nitude too la rge in th e model results. Furthermore, Stone's clouds a rc concentrated in the rela ti\ 'C ly \\'a rm middle troposphere. The cloud bases were located nea r the inversion top, a nd cloud tops wcre located between 500 to 280 hPa. Furthermore, Bromwich (1988) notes that clear­sky prec ipitati on tends to fo rm in the relative ly wa rm a ir near the top of the inve rsion. The model's maxim a in cloud concentrati on in the lower a nd upper troposphere a re ap­pa rentl y spurious. It is quite possible, however, tha t persis­tent, very thin cirrus occ urs in the Anta rcti c uppcr troposphere. The time va ri ati on of the modeled cloud con­centrati on in the upper troposphere indica tes that a cloud layer O\'er Anta rctica appea rs in the upper troposphere ea rly in the simula ti on (Fig. 5a) and persists for the rest of the month . The appearance of the cloud laye r co incides close ly with fa lling temperatures nea r the upper tropo­sphere (Fig. 6), indicating a link through outgo ing longwave radia ti on.

The high cloud concentrati on seen within the bounda ry­layer regime fix \V ETJU :"J is a lso of questi onable \'Cd idit y, as Stone (1993) determined that South Pole clouds norm a ll y ha\'e their base nea r the top of the inversion. Equation (3)

indicates that a sufficientl y dense cloud is required for a uto­conversion to prec ipita tion to occur, espec ia ll y a t ve ry low ten'pcratures. Observations, howeve r, sugges t that prec ipi­tati on can form without a \'isible cloud present.

Page 4: Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

0.00012

0.00010

0.00008

... . ~ 0.00006

""be ..>(

be

a

( Nl':;' 1-........................ ; ..... __ ._ .............. c_ ..... _ ...... _._ ....... + ...... _ ............ __ ... + .... _ .......... _ ... +/"'I -'.7~;

,'l ,'l

f- --........... _ ... t-.. _ .... · __ ..... _;.. .............. _ .. · .. ·i~ .. ·-.... ·-.......... ·+-· ........ ·· ......... "f ... }_ .. _-_ ... __ .. . i ,

..>( 0.00004

if 'I

.I-... --................ +- .. -............. . + -.... -... --.... -....... ~-.- ..... --.. ·_·_·+_·--.. ·J·· .. ·/ i-.. ·--,A~ ! / /' I

, ~~.j i 0.00002

0.00000

0.00020 b

0.00015

... . ~ 0.00010

""be ..>(

be ..>(

0.00005

O.OOO4·r-----,-----,----,-----,-----,----,

C

0.0003'1-.. ·_ ............ __ .. +··_ .... · __ ·_/

0.0001

4

June 1988

Fig. 5. Time el'olation cif cloud mass ,[raction ( kg kg ') al modellel'e/s. a) -J ( ajJjJrorimale0' 230 hPa): b) 12 ( ajJ/JTOX­il7lale[)' 6-J0 hPa ): and c) 16 ( ajJjJ1'O,\ill1ale[J' 23 m above the s1l1jace) JOT ' I'ET]L~ \ -( Ihick !lne ), Xl ( shal'l dashed line ), v V"2 ( long dashed fine) and S3 ( Ihin line).

The probl ems a n sing from Equations (1)-(3) can be dem onstra ted. According to Equatio n (I), fo r a temperature of 220 K a nd a density of 1 kg m :\ the nuclei co ncentratio n

is 7,07 lO" kg I, This la rge number suggests tha t cloud ice

particles individua ll y will be very sm a ll , which is un[a\'or­

able fo r au toeonvers ion to precipitation, Initi a ti on of clo ud part icles, acco rd i ng to Equa tion (2), \Vi 11 t hen proceed rapid ly fo r supersat ura ti on and a ny rea li sti c c lo ud-m ix ing ra ti o. Th e crit ical cloud m ass frac ti on, qnil , for a utoCO ll\'er­

sion is 6,65, which is obviously unreali st ic. f leteher (1962),

howe\ 'C r, no tes that the nucl ei co ncentratio n can \'ar y severa l orders o f m agnitude [or a g i\ 'en temperature, The Antarctic a tmosphere has a low aerosol eo nte lll that wou ld appea r to fayor less numerous, but large r cloud particles.

Hinesand others: Eva/ua/ing Antarc/ic mesoscalesimu/atiolls

H ence, precipitation is likely to form more easily th a n sug­ges ted by Equations (1)-(3),

These co nsidera ti ons inspired th ree se nsiti\ 'it y experi­ments that conT th e period from 0000 h UTC I June 1988

to 0000 h lJTC on 7 June 1988, Since the errors in cloud

mass fraction a rc so la rge, this 6 day period is long enoug h

to establi sh th e de\'eloplllent of th e errors, To test the sens i­tivity o f' the Antarctic simul a ti ons to reduced clo ud nuclei co ncen tra ti on. two simul a ti ons were performed, In experi ­ment :\"1 , \\ 'hi ch assumes a pristine el1\ 'ironmen t, th e nuc lei concentra ti on is Illultipli ed by 0,01. In ex pc riment 1'\ 2,

which a lso ass umes the number o f' e fTccti\ 'C ice-cloud nuclei

is limited , nuclei concentra tion is multipli ed by 0,01 for temperatu res a bO\'C 233.15 K a nd set a t 2,65 x 106 m :1

diyided by densit y [or temperatures at or < 233.15 K. Thus in N2. th e nucl ei conce11lration is eq ua l to or less than that of :\11 for the same temperature la rger (sm a ll er) than 233,15 K.

Expcriment S3 is designed to reduce th e excessi\ 'c cloud

co ncentra ti on compared to the \\'a ter-vapor concentration.

In thi s case, the nuclei co ncentra ti on is identi ca l to th a t of 1'\2 for th e sall1e tempera ture, Furthe rm ore. th e critical cloud co ncentra ti on [or aULOeo l1\'Crs ion, qcril . is reduced to the sawra ti on-nlpo r conccntra tion when it exceed s th a t

quantit y (sce Equation (3)),

Fig ure 5 displays the clo ud co nce nt ra ti on for WETJ :\", :\11 , i\' 2 a nd S3 a t three m ode llC\ 'C ls: +, 12 a ndl 6 a t about 230 hP,!' 6+0 hPa a nd 23 III a bo\"(' g round le\'C I, resp ec tiyely. [o r the South Po le. In th e upper tropos phe re (Fig. Sa), the cloud

is co nside ra bl y thinner in S3, This leads to a m ore reason­

able tempera ture at thi s level (Fig. 6), The nuel ei co ncentra­

ti on ill NI and ~2 is probably st ill too la rge, despite th e

red uc ti o n. Consequentl y. the clouds a re on ly slightl y thin­ner in the upper troposphere a nd th e temperatures appea r to be too cold, r n th e middle troposp here, \\'here the cloud concen tra ti on in \\' ETJ U1\ appears to be more rcasonable

than a t hig hcr a nd lower le\ 'Cls, th e reduced nuclei co nccn­

tra ti o n in NI , ~2 and S3 appea rs to imprQ\'C the res ults (Fig, 5 b ), Atll10dellcvel 12, near the top of'th e Antarc tic sur[acc inve rsio n, th e a\'erage cloud th ickness is reduced in th e sen­sitivit y experiments, and th e sy nopti c \ 'ar iabilit y can clea r ly be see n. The clo ud co ncentra ti on o f':\I1 is nea r'" identica l to

th a t of N2 in Fig ure 5 b, Peri od ica ll y, this b 'e! becomes

210r------,------,------,------,-----~------,

205r .. - .. ·········· .... ; ····· .. ···-.. ·· .. ·· .. · .. ·· i · .. ~~ .. · .. ;···· .. ·· .. ·-·· .. ··· .. ·· ...... t .. · .... · ~~ · .. .. .. i··· .. ················ .. ··· .. i

:><: ID 200 r .......... ·· ...... ·_·+·_ ...... _ ........ ·_ .... + .... ·_ ...... · ........ _ .. .,.._ ...... _ .............. +. \ Q)

b'o Q)

o 195r .. ·· .... · ···· .... ··_· .. ; .. · .. ·· .... _······-·j .. ·_·· ...... ······ ...... ··;···· .. ·····_ .. ····· ........ ·1 .. · ...... _· .. ,

June 1988

Fig. 6, Time el'o/ltlion ciflelll/Jera/ure ( It") a/lllode//e l'e/-Jjor J I ET}L: \ . ( thick line ), ' \ 1 ( .rhor/ da .rherl/ine), ,\ "2 ( long dashed line) and S3 ( thinlille).

285

Page 5: Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale ... · Annals cifGlaciology 25 1997 ... Evaluating ll1.oist physics for Antarctic ll1.esoscale sill1.ulations ... A similar

J-Jines and others: Evaluating Antarctic mesoscale simulations

cloud free. At level 16, the red uced nuclei concentration in N I and N2 reduces the cloud concent ra tion by about 40 % from that ofWETJ UN (Fig. 5c ). The easier autoconversion of cloud to precipitat ion in S3 has a much more significant effect at level 16, than the reduced nuclei concentration, as the cloud thi ckness is abo ut a quarter of that of N I and N2. C uri ously, the reduced cloud thickness in N I, N2 and S3 for the middle a nd lower troposphere did not have a significant impact on the temperature fi eld for those layers. The change in nuclei concentration with temperature apparentl y does not have a great effec t for temperatures below 233.15 K, since the re~ ults for N I a nd N2 a re simila r. These experi­ments help us understa nd the deficiencies in the moist-physics parameterization, but more obse rvationa l and modeling work is required before acc urate and physicall y realistic

parameterizations for the high southern latitude hydrology can be implemented in numerica l models.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Simulations of Anta rctic meteorology with a modified ver­sion of the PSU/NCAR MM4 have demonstrated tha t the moist-phys ics pa rameteri zation is inadequate for the unique winter climate of Antarctica. Inadequacies in simul ated

Anta rctic clouds lead directly to errors in the longwave ra­di ati ve calcu la tions. T he lack of cloud and cloud physics studies in this very cold and low-aerosol environment limits our abilit y to formulate and ve rify parameterizations. Nevertheless, we can begin to improve the cloud pa rameter­ization after first identifying model defi ciencies. ro r the

simulation of June 1988 with the explicit moisture physics, wc find that ove r the high interior of Anta rctica there a rc th ree different moist-physics regimes in the vc rtica l: the very cold upper troposphere, the rela tively warm middle troposphere and the co ld boundary layer. Deficiencies for these layers include the following: (1) there is excessive cloud

ice in the upper troposphere; (2) excess ive cloud ice i. a lso found in the inversion near the ice surface; (3) temperatures a rc too warm in the lower troposphere; (4) temperatures are LOO cold in the upper troposphere; a nd (5) downward long­wa" e radiat ion is excessive at the Earth's surface. Findings (1) and (4) a rc directly rela ted, as a re findings (2), (3) and

(5). Findings (1) and (3) may also be related through down­ward longwave radiation from high-level clouds. It appears tha t the explicit cloud pa ra meteri zation retains too much wa ter substa nce in ice clouds at very low temperatures.

T he excessive ice clouds p robably arise from the conve r­sion terms between vapor, cloud and precipitation pa nicles, as the meridional moisture flu x towards higher southern latitudes is reasonablc (Hines and others, 1997). The la rge variati on of para lTleteri zed condensation nuclei with temp­el-alUre indicates that low temperature clouds consist of highl y numerous and sma ll ice pa rticl es. The pa rameteri zed autoconversion process, by which cloud pa rticles obtain suf­fi cient size to become fa lling precipitation, is not favored at low temperatures. Yet, observations of slow, but hydrologi­ca ll y significant "clear-sky" precipitati on over the high interior of Antarctica suggests that precipitati on pa rticles ca n form under rea li stic conditions without visible clouds. If present during episodes of clear-sky prec ipita tion, clouds must have ve ry low water content.

286

SUMMARY

Three sensitivity ex periments were performed with the goal of improving the moist-physics simulations by reducing cloud condensation nuclei a nd increas ing autoconversion of cloud to preci pi ta lion. A red uction of cloud condensati on nuclei, while reducing some of the excess cloud ice, appears to be insufficient to so lve the difficulti es. A reduction in the excessive cloud concentrati on in the upper troposphere does, howe\'er, significantly improvc the simul ation of upper tropospheric temperature. The res ults of this stud y emphas ize the need for testing and development of physical pa ramcterizations adapted espec ia lly for high southern la ti­tudes in particul ar, and for the pola r regions in general.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This resea rch was supported 111 pa rt by NASA grant NAGW-2718 to D. H . Bromwich. The numerica l model was prO\'ided byT. Pa rish at the Universit y of Wyoming, and the radiation code fo r moist physics was provided by R. Leung at the Pac ific Nor thwest Laboratory. The numerical simul a­tions were pet-formed on the CR AY Y-MP at the Ohio Supercomputer Cenler, which is support ed by the Sta te of Ohio and on the CRAY Y-MP at NCAR, which is sup­pOl-ted by the Nationa l Science Foundation. This paper i contribution 1026 of the BYI'd Polar Research Center.

REFERENCES

Anlhes, R. 1\., E. -Y. Hsie and Y. -H. !':.uo. 1987. Desai/Jlioll o/Ihe Pellll Slale/ . \'G~ R lIIesoscate model "fI'siOIl 4 (,If. \ '4). Boulder, CO, Na tiona l Centr r for Atmospheric Resea rch. (i\CAR Techn ical i\ote T N-282+STR.)

Bromwich, O. H. 1988. Snowfa ll in high southern latitudes. Ret ,. Gen/)/9's., 26 (1 ). 1'.9 168.

Bromwirh, D. H .. F. r-1. Robas ky, R . I. C ullather and r-l. L. ,·an \\loe r t. 1995. The a tmospheric hydrologic cycle O\'er the Southern Ocean and Ant­arctica fro III operat iona l nu merica l ana lyses. /\Jon. f I fa/Itn Rn'., 123 (12), 3518- 3538.

Cerni , T. 1\. and T. A. Paris h. 198.J.. A rad iati vc model of the stable noctur­

na l bou ndary layer wi th application to [he polar night. J Clima/e AP/JI. ,1Ie/eoro/. , 23 (1 1), 1563 1572.

Chen, B. , D. H. Bromwich, K. r-1. Hines and 'C. Pan. 1995. Simu lations or the 1979 88 po la r clim ates by globa l clim ate model s. A 1111. (;Iarioi., 21, 83 90.

Dudhia, .J. 1989. Ku merica l study oreom'cetion obsen 'ed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesosca le two-di mensiona l model. J A/lIlos. Sei., 46 (20), 3077 3107.

Fletcher, N. H. 1962. Thepl!ysicsq/raillciouds. Cambridge, Ca mbridge Uni ,'CI'­sit )' Press.

Callee, H. 1995. Simulation of' the mcsocyclonic act i"ity in the Ross Sea, A ntarc ti ca. M Oll. 11 ealher Rpu .. 123(7).2031 2069.

Hines, K . ~I " D. H. Bromwich and T. R. Pa rish. 1995. A mesoscaic model­ing study of the atmospheric circul ation of high southern latitucies. JIolI. Il ea/her Re1'.233.15

Hines, K. :,,1. , D. H. Bromwich and Z. Liu. 1997. Combined CCr-1 and mesosea lc model simula ti ons of An ta rcti c cl imate. J Ceo/Jlrys. Res., 102 (D 12), 13,747- 13)60.

I-Tsie. E. -'I'. and R. A. Anthes. 1984. Simulations of frontogenesis in a moist atJllosphcre using a llcrnati \'e pa ramc ter izal io ns of concle ns:u ioll and prec ipita ti on. J ;] /lI1os. Sri., 41, :l701 2716.

Pi nto, J. 0. a ndJ A. C urry. 1997. Role of radi ali" e tra nsfer in the modelcd mesoscalc de"elopmelll of sum me rtime Arctic stratus. J CeopI9's. Res., 102 (012).13,861 13,872.

R amanarhan, v. , B. R. Barkstrom and E. F. Harrison. 1989. C lim ate and the Eart h's rad iation budget. Ph),s. 7od(I)', 42 (5), 22 32.

Stone, R. S. 1993. Properties of austral wi nter clouds c1er iwd from rad io­metr ic pro fi les at the SOllth Pole. J G'eoph),s. Res., 98 (D 7), 12,961 12.971.

T zeng, R. -Y., D. H. BroJ11wich, T. R. Pa rish and B. C hen. 199.J.. NeAR CCr-f 2 simulation of the modern Anta rcti c cl imate. J Ceoph)'S. Res., 99 ( DII ), 23,131-23,1.J.8.