Igor LiskaICPDR

EUSDR PA5 - ICPDR

2

DFRMP:PFRA Review and update • The same APSFR map criteria as applied in the first cycle;

• Working deadline for the delivery of updating text

information for the ICPDR PFRA report and of APSFR map

data (in cooperation with IMGIS EG) is 30 June 2019.

DFRMP:Review and update of flood risk and flood hazard maps • FP EG agreed that the same flood hazard map as in the first

cycle will be used. All countries will have to update the map data in cooperation with the IMGIS EG;

• FP EG agreed to use all flood risk maps from the first cycle and to add a map of affected cultural heritage sites (UNESCO sites);

• The national plans for flood maps updating indicate that all map data can be expected by the end of 2020.

3

4

Flood hazard data

5

Data collection sheet - Flood Risk in the DRBD 2013Country:Data provider:Remarks:

High Medium LowRisk and populationNumber of affected population (in thousands ):

Risk and economic activityInundated area in thousand km² per category:

AgricultureIndustryInfrastructureUrban areasOthersTotal 0 0 0

Risk and and installations with the potential to cause pollutionNumber of affected IPPC/Seveso installations:

Risk and WFD protected areasNumber of affected protected areas:

Drinking waterRecreational waterTotal protected areas

All data has to be provided for the part of the country belonging to the Danube River Basin District.

Scenario (Probability) Chart Previews

High Medium Low

Flood Risk data

6

UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Sites

DFRM Plan – Update 2021

• FP EG explored the need of amending DFRMP 2015 objectives for DFRMP Update 2021 and agreed to keep them unchanged as they cover all relevant aspects;

• FP EG reviewed the Table of Contents of DFRMP 2015 and agreed to include for Update 2021 information on progress in achieving objectives and in implementing measures;

• Discussed approach for progress assessment: Match each objective with best practices, then compare 2013 and 2019 maps to assess the measures and then compare Annex 2 projects;

• Agreed to keep a separate chapter on water retention, which shall contain both NWRM and technical measures.

7

• DAREFFORT project supports Danube HIS development;• Principles of cooperation of DAREFFORT with DE, AT, CZ,

RS, MD and BA in terms of achieving a coherent solution for the whole Danube River Basin have been clarified: BA through SavaHIS and ASPs are data providers and this way all countries will receive the data exchange software.

• The updated draft of the policy document reflecting all comments received (including those from the IMGIS EG) has to be discussed by countries and data providers.

8

Danube Hydrological Information System

Adaptation to ClimateChange (1)§ Ministers asked in Danube Ministerial Meeting 2016 to

update the Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change in 2018

§ Austria, Germany and Serbia acting as Lead Countries§ Stepwise approach

§ Danube Climate Adaptation Study updated by Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich in January 2018

§ Workshop on Adaptation to Climate Change in March 2018§ Draft “ICPDR Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change”

developed with input from relevant EGs, TGs and Team of Experts§ Final draft Strategy provided for adoption at OM-21§ Strategy will serve as guidance for the next DRBMP and

DFRMP and as reference document for the national level

Adaptation to Climate Change (2)

§ Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change 2018 is more “action/measures-oriented”

§ Includes online toolbox of possible adaptation measures available on ICPDR webpage

http://www.icpdr.org/main/climate-change-adaptation-measures-toolbox

AEWS operation

• Comprehensive multinational test was organized in the frame of the APCEG-11: all PIACs participated actively and were able to perform the major tasks within the system given by the test instructions;

• The APC EG agreed that in case that information on radioactivity in water accident would reach a PIAC it will be communicated via the Danube AEWS using Substance Category “Others” and the description “radioactivity” or similar. The Secretariat will adjust the AEWS operations manual accordingly.

Risk assessment

• On-going data revision/fine-tuning based on harmonized selection criteria (all SEVESO/UNECE sites in the DRB)

• APC EG to revise and complete the pre-filled AHS data and to upload the completed AHS datasets to DanubeGIS by 31 July 2019

• Technical report on AHS will be updated and finalized in 2019

• Further efforts needed to identify and assess CS

Tailings management facilities

• Tailing Hazard Index developed in UA to be applied: simple hazard index using basic TMF data (volume, hazard class, dam parameters);

• APC EG agreed to finalise the data review and approval process and to upload the final TMF templates to DanubeGIS by end of June 2019;

• TMFs to be prioritized in the DRB based on hazard index;• Demonstration training events for inspectors and

operators and hazard assessment on TMFs in the DRB (project support).