Upload
doanxuyen
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
WASH AID PRIORITIES: DISTRIBUTION OF AID COMMITMENTS (2010–2012)
least developed country
other low income
lower middle income
upper middle income
37%
34%29%
by income group
Priorities are based on country strategies. A focus on off-track MDGs, including sanitation, was given for the MDG initiative, under which €266 million have been allocated to WASH projects in 19 ACP countries. The last call for proposals of the ACP-EU Water Facility was dedicated to sanitation.
EC supports the Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA) a platform for dialogue and exchange of experience between the EU and developing countries on climate policy and on practical approaches. Inclusion of WASH activities is variable, depending on country programmes.
ASPECTS OF WASH AID
The ACP-EU Water Facility has allowed the EC to fund about 290 WASH projects, providing safe drinking water to more than 18 million people and sanitation to more than 6 million. An on-going evaluation will identify specific examples of success.
EXAMPLES OF SUCCESS
by mdg region
northern africa western asia
sub-saharan africa
not applicable
latin america and caribbean
caucasus and central asia
eastern and southern asia
developed countries
2%
2%
4%
42%
16%8%
note: an additional 13% of ec sanitation and water oda is targeted to sector or multi-country programmes
13%
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
Priority sectors for the European Commission’s (EC) aid programme during the period 2014–2020 are: human rights, democracy and governance; inclusive and sustainable growth for human development; social protection, health, education and jobs; business environment, regional integration and world markets; sustainable agriculture and energy.
Priority areas are defined by the ‘Agenda for change’1. Several countries having rural development as priority sector include water and sanitation in their activities. The EC does not have criteria for choosing countries to support.
Specific TargetsThe WASH sector.
AID POLICY FOR WASH/TARGETS
1 Agenda for change: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/news/agenda_for_change_en.htm
EXTERNAL S U P P O R T A G E N C Y H
IGH
LIG
HT
S
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas/en/
800
200
andré liebaert & antoine saintraint
policy officers europaid – unit ’water, energy, infrastructure’41, rue de la loi
1040 brussels
belgiumcontact
deta
ils email: [email protected]
tel: +32 2 2992753 +32 2 2988724
FUTURE OUTLOOKWater is reflected in the context of sustainable growth, with focus on agriculture and energy, as well as regional integration.
ALIGNMENT AND HARMONISATION
grant vs loan
100% Grant, (2013 data).
use of country results frameworks
EC (generally) uses country results frameworks.
use of country procurement systems
EC uses country procurement systems in Moldova, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, CAR, Lesotho, Namibia, Burkina Faso, Grenada, Bolivia, Samoa.
FOCUS ON EQUITY
Individual WASH programmes address equity issues taking account of the specific circumstances that exist within the country or countries where the programmes are being implemented.
OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY
Monitoring of programmes is country specific and actions are determined by the country teams.
1400
1200
1000
600
400
commitment
disbursement
536
2010
720656
2011
604687
2012
1,193
0
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
wash aid commitments and disbursements, constant 2011 (us$ million)
average commitment
average disbursement
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
ten highest wash aid recipients, ranked by average commitments, 2010–2012 (us$ million)
|120
|0
|20
|40
|60
|80
|100
Egypt
Bilateral, unspecified
Nigeria
Chad
Turkey
Boznia- Herzegovina
Tunisia
Albania
Macedonia, FYR
Tanzania
The EC provides General Budget Support but it has not been possible to assess how much of this goes to WASH. €88 million of the EC’s €565 million for WASH is provided as sector budget support.
PREDICTABILITY
Developed and coordinated by the Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Health (WSH) Unit at the World Health Organization (WHO) in preparation for the Sanitation and Water for All (SWA) High-Level Meeting (HLM), April 2014.
Results contained in this ‘ESA Highlights’ have been compiled by the GLAAS External Support Agency (ESA) Focal Point and the GLAAS Team using data from the Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) Creditor Reporting System (CRS)1, estimates and text provided in the responses to the GLAAS 2013/2014 ESA survey, and interviews conducted with ESA representatives at World Water Week in Stockholm, September 2013.
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.1 OECD-CRS (2014) online database available: http://stats.oecd.org/
23%
39% 38%
basic systems
large systems
other
BASIC VS. LARGE SYSTEMS (2010–2012) NEW VS. EXISTING SERVICES (2012) WATER VS. SANITATION (2012)
[ No disaggregated data available. ]
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
16%
84%
drinking water
sanitation
Source: OECD-CRS, 2014
note:Only 9% of aid is disaggregated between sanitation and water
ACCOUNTABILITY
ReportingAnnual Report 2013 on the European Community’s Development and External Assistance Policies and their Implementation in 20121. The latest report in 2012 covered 524.59 million Euros of aid to water and sanitation (managed by Europaid).
Mutual Assessment ExercisesMutual assessments carried out in: Guinea-Bissau: Joint sector review; Malawi; Solomon Islands; Lesotho; Niger; Tanzania; Comores; Bolivia.
1 http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/multimedia/publications/publications/annual-reports/2013_en.htm
9619
9312
2
15
9
5515
50
376
3510
2418
26
2513
27
http
://w
ww
.who
.int/
wat
er_s
anita
tion_
heal
th/g
laas
/en/