EuropeAid

Main conclusions and implications for EU Delegations

Training Seminar – 7th of July

Maxime MontagnerDEVCO Unit D2 « Civil society, local authorities »

EuropeAidINDEX

•Rationale and methodology of the SD

•Outputs & institutional Follow-up

•Selected recommendations & implications for EU Delegations

EuropeAid

The Structured Dialogue: Why?Internal & external incentives

• Important changes after the Palermo Process

Evaluation of EC aid delivery through CSOs European Court of Auditors Report Mid-term review of the NSA&LA thematic Programme Capitalisation of support programmes

to NSAs&LAs (9th EDF)

•The principles of the Paris Declaration &

the Accra Agenda for Action

claim for a broad-based ownership

of development strategies.

Conducive for EC effort to enhance its partnership

with CSO & LAs3

EuropeAid

4

WG1: Role of CSO&LA in EU external cooperation (from programming to evaluation)

WG1: Role of CSO&LA in EU external cooperation (from programming to evaluation)

WG2: Complementarity and coherence within the Aid Effectiveness Agenda

WG2: Complementarity and coherence within the Aid Effectiveness Agenda

WG3: EU aid delivery

mechanisms

WG3: EU aid delivery

mechanisms

Policy-informing debatesPolicy-informing debates

Operational debatesOperational debates

Based on topics agreed-upon during preparatory phase

Sequencing of discussions

April 2010/March 2011

November 2010/March 2011

April 2010/March 2011

EuropeAid

• Participation of CSO and LA from EU Partner countries has been systematically promoted. More than 700 representatives from over 65 Partners countries have been gathered during SD events;

• At European and global level: 10 main European Platforms of Civil Society Organizations have been involved, representing the different sections of CS as well as Platforma.

• Member States and Members of the European Parliament have been actively involved as well as EC and 51 EU Delegations.

5

Extensive consultation & exchanges and unprecedented support

EuropeAid

Events: 13 Workshops & Regional

Seminars

6

EuropeAid

Intermediary Outputs & Main Results

•Reports drafted after each event (in Brussels & regional

seminars)

•Final Declaration & Concluding Paper with key messages

and recommendations

• 12 Technical fiches on funding & selection mechanisms

7

EuropeAid

Announcement in Budapest: which institutional follow-up?

• Communication of the EC on Engaging with CSO & LA in development cooperation (2012)

• DEVCO Unit D2: Stable institutional interface for CSO and LA

• Thematic programme NSA&LA to be reshaped to support more particularly CSO&LA platforms at different levels

• Integration of Structured Dialogue conclusions in EU position on Aid Effectiveness

• Update of methodological tools for EU Delegations, including on aid delivery and selection mechanisms

EuropeAidSelected recommendations: which implications for EUD?

On enabling environment for CSO:

The EU should commit to and promote an enabling environment for

CSOs as independent development actors in line with

internationally agreed commitments

The EU is called on to base budget support decisions upon

assessments of government commitment to respect and promote

democratic values and practices, human rights, accountability and

CSOs and LAs involvement

EuropeAidSelected recommendations: which implications for EUD?

The EU should promote and support regular, structured and

inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogues to increase trust,

complementarity and mutual accountability across stakeholders:

(i) long-term, predictable and independent funding (for research,

advocacy and networking) should be envisaged to empower CSO

and LAs (particularly representative organizations)

(ii) EC guidelines on dialogue and consultation should be followed and

possibly redefined

(i) more efforts should be made, including around consultations, to

improve the accessibility and quality of information.

EuropeAidSelected recommendations: which implications for EUD?

On CSO right of initiative & accountability:

The EU should respect and actively promote the right of initiative of

CSOs avoiding unwarranted governmental interference. Adequate

political and financial support (free from State control) should be provided

to CSOs, including defending civil society’s space when necessary.

European CSOs are called on to (i) acknowledge that the initiative of the

identification of local development needs relies primarily on local CSOs,

(i) enhance their understanding of the mandate and priorities of local

counterparts through research and dialogue, (iii) be responsible to their

local partners' priorities and accountable towards them.

EuropeAidSelected recommendations: which implications for EUD?

On territorial approach to development:

The EU is prompted to attach a fundamental importance to

decentralization (e.g. by including indicators linked to local

governance in the set of conditionalities to donors’ partnerships with

national governments).

Local governments and the associations representing local

governments should be recognised as legitimate development

partners and should be systematically invited to engage in policy

dialogues.

EuropeAid

On knowledge management:

Strategic mappings should be regularly conducted and updated to

identify the most relevant actors, yet going beyond the known

beneficiaries

Sufficient resources and guidance should be made available so as

to develop, apply and monitor CSO and LA engagement strategies

and practices. In particular, networks of both CSO & LA focal

points in EUD should be strengthened and developed.

Selected recommendations: which implications for EUD?

EuropeAidEU aid delivery and selection mechanisms

Possible solutions identified (I)

• 12 technical briefs covering different aid modalities and mechanisms

• General consensus on strengths and weaknesses of those modalities

• Calls for proposals to be complemented by more diverse mix of aid modalities (operational toolbox)

EuropeAid

Possible solutions identified (II)

Operational toolbox should focus on: • providing a flexible set of responses adaptable to different local situations;

• incorporating sensible actor differentiation;

• allowing for more strategic and effective pursuit of development objectives by both donors and partner organisations.

EU aid delivery and selection mechanisms

EuropeAid

Possible solutions identified (III)

• Commission proposal for 2012 review of Financial Regulation globally welcomed as step in the right direction:

- more flexible rules for regranting- core funding for non-EU organisations- possibility of EC-managed trust funds- more flexible co-financing rules

• Next update in the context of the new Financial Perspective

• Financial Regulation offers sufficient flexibility (!!)

EU aid delivery and selection mechanisms

EuropeAid

Possible solutions identified (IV)

Concrete examples of possible tools:

• Simplified calls for proposal application process

• Regranting for improved access to funding by

grass-roots organisations

• EC-managed trust funds for strengthened aid effectiveness and donor harmonisation• Ringfencing and full financing to promote involvement of specific types of actors• Programme funding for better strategic focus and enhanced sustainability• Core funding for advocacy work and capacity-building

EU aid delivery and selection mechanisms

EuropeAid

Main challenge: how to operationalize

recommendations?

- Which specific support would EUD need from HQ so as to improve their strategic engagement with CSO&LA?

- Tools, guidelines, toolkit are already existing…Are they effectively disseminated and used by colleagues in EU Delegations?

- Which content for a potential forthcoming EU Staff working paper which would build on results of the SD?

EuropeAidFor more information…

Please consult the Civil Society Helpdesk

CISOCH

https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/aidco/index.php/Main_Page

Maxime MontagnerDEVCO D2 « Civil society, local authorities »