Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ethics of War
12-20%
Ethics of Foreign Intervention• Foreign intervention involves the direct or indirect use of power to influence the affairs of other states.
• Intervention can be undertaken openly or covertly, individually or collectively and can involve relatively non-coercive actions such as propaganda and official condemnation or coercive measures such as economic sanc-tions to directly military intervention
• It is done for a variety of purposes – economic imperialism, countering prior inter-vention, promoting political objectives, pro-tecting human rights and fostering national security
• However, intervention has been mostly associated with moral cloud. Hence, it is necessary to examine morality of intervention
Morality of economic sanctions • Economic sanctions are particular type of tools in the statecraft to advance foreign policy goals of states. They are preferable to more coercive tools such as war
• Usually they involve – 1. Positive incentive i.e. carrot, designed to induce or reward desirable behaviour2. Negative sanctions i.e. stick, designed to punish state for undesirable behaviour
Are they effective ?
• Although economic “sticks” can no doubt affect the behaviour of foreign actors, economic coercion alone is not decisive• For one thing, foreign policy decision making is a multidimensional process that is subject to numerous domestic and interna-tional factors.• Inducing behavioural change is far more difficult against autocratic regimes
Ethical Concerns • According to some thinkers sanctions are indeed a form of violence
• Many thinkers says that they are morally dubious.
• For example : One of the most influen-tial anti-apartheid activist highlighted the morally problematic nature of economic sanc-tions because they imposed great hardship on poor blacks
• Before applying it must satisfy certain conditions
• the decision to intervene must he made with care, taking into account political, legal, and moral considerations
• One of the most important and innova-tive ideas to emerge in response to the sys-temic atrocities and human rights abuses of the 1990s is the notion of “responsibility to protect” (R2P)
• Humanitarian intervention must pass two tests – 1. Political test2. Ethical test