24
ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapters 2, 3, and 4

Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

  • Upload
    gerd

  • View
    93

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ethics and Law for school Psychologists. Chapters 2, 3, and 4. Chapter 2. Ethics and Law for School Psychologists Law and School Psychology: An Introduction. Laws and the Legal System. U.S. Constitution. 1 st Amendment: Freedom of Speech, Religion, and Assembly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

ETHICS AND LAW FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTSChapters 2, 3, and 4

Page 2: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Ethics and Law for School Psychologists

Law and School Psychology: An Introduction

Chapter 2

Page 3: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Laws and the Legal System

Page 4: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

U.S. Constitution 1st Amendment: Freedom of Speech,

Religion, and Assembly 10th Amendment: Powers not delegated

to the U.S. Government is delegated to the states

14th Amendment: Equal protection (civil rights) and procedural due process

Page 5: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Federal Legislation (Education) Elementary and Secondary Education Act

(ESEA; 1965) U.S. Gov’t provides funds and in exchange they

can maintain a “floor” for services provided in schools

NCLB (2001) Amended ESEA and added extras Requires AYP through gathering assessment data

IDEA; PL 94-142 (1975) Assured FAPE for all children

FERPA (1974) Parents can say who has access to records Parents have access to child’s records

Page 6: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Federal Legislation (Civil Rights) Civil Rights Act (1871)

(Originally known as Ku Klux Klan Act) Can be sued for damages for discriminatory

actions Rehabilitation Act (1973)

Cannot prohibit anyone from services based on a disability.

Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) Equal opportunities in virtually all areas for

anyone with a disability.

Page 7: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

State Legislation It is your obligation to become familiar

with the state laws specific to education and civil rights.

Most of these can be found on the State Department of Education websites.

Cannot supersede federal law or constitution.

Page 8: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Case Law Case laws only apply to the jurisdiction in

which the case was decided. Regional Cases:

Larry P. vs. Riles (State of California) Tarasoff

Federal Cases Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) Pennsylvania Association for Retarded

Children (PARC) vs. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (1971)

Mills vs. District of Columbia (1972)

Page 9: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Civil Cases: Malpractice Proof needed to win a malpractice suit

Professional relationship between psychologist and person that results in legal duty of care

Standard of care exists AND practitioner broke that standard.

Client suffered harm or injury The professionals breach of care is the

proximal cause of harm to the client. Legal duty of care

Ordinary: customary practice Reasonable: use of professional judgment Prudent: maintained adequate safeguards

Page 10: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Ethics and Law for School Psychologists

Privacy, Informed Consent, Confidentiality, and Record Keeping

Chapter 3

Page 11: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Definitions Privacy: unnecessary intrusions regarding

actions or information concerning a person Informed Consent: agreement that is knowing,

competent, and voluntary that requires an action from the person providing agreement

Assent: usually needed for a child; general agreement for services.

Privileged communications: right held by client to prevent disclosure from any mental health worker.

Page 12: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Privacy Case Law New Jersey vs. TLO (Search of property):

Reasonable suspicion (children) NOT probable cause (adults) Cannot be excessively intrusive (closer to body the

higher the reasons needed for suspicion) Sterling vs. Borough of Minersville (Gay rights):

School threatened to disclose a gay student’s sexual orientation to his parents. Student committed suicide.

Students have right to privacy unless “genuine, legitimate, and compelling” reason to disclose

Student’s sexual orientation should not be disclosed without student’s permission.

Page 13: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Privacy Legislation IDEA (1975) Protection of Pupils’ Rights Act (1978)

Rights to privacy (family and child) Cannot require the following information

Political affiliation Mental issues that might embarrass the student Sex behavior and attitudes Illegal or demeaning actions (self-incrimination) Critical appraisals of family members Any legally privileged relationships Religious beliefs or actions Income (except for programs such as free/ reduced

lunch)

Page 14: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Privacy Legislation FERPA (1974)

Educational Records Defined Right to Inspect and Review Records Right to Confidentiality of Records Right to Request Amendment of Records Complaints

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Security Transmission of data

Page 15: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

FERPA Exceptions Appropriate officials for health and

safety emergencies Authorities w/in juvenile justice system Certain organizations performing studies

in certain circumstances. Other schools for transferring students Specified officials for audit and

evaluation purposes.

Page 16: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Guidelines for Living: Privacy Informed consent needed before any

significant intrusion on a person’s privacy. Consultation services by school psychologists

NOT requiring informed consent Urgent and/or special situations Resulting interventions under authority of

teacher Within scope of regular classroom activities Not intrusive to family and/or child beyond what

normal classroom activities would be.

Page 17: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Guidelines for Living: Confidentiality Define limits from the onset (and if any

changes are made in professional services/relationship with client)

Disclose information with third parties (with permission) on a “need-to-know” basis

Recognize when disclosure of information will do harm and avoid it.

Limits requiring disclosure Student/ parents request it Danger to student or others Legal requirement (court testimony)

Page 18: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Guidelines for Living: Records Required to keep sufficient records Keep academic and health records separate

as a practice. Progress notes and personal records should

be kept separate from other records Keep records for a minimum of 3 years after

age of majority (or 7 years after last date of service).

Digital records follow certain guidelines Double locked Secure email Formatting issues

Page 19: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Ethics and Law for School Psychologists

Ethical-Legal issues in the Education of Students with Disabilities Under IDEA

Chapter 4

Page 20: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

IDEA Diagnostic Categories Autism Emotional

Disturbance Mental Retardation Orthopedic Impaired Other Health

Impaired Specific Learning

Disability Traumatic Brain Injury

Deaf-blindness Deafness Hearing Impaired Visual

Impairments (including blind)

Speech/Language Multiple

Disabilities

Page 21: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

IDEA: SLD Information

Oral Expression Listening

Comprehension Written Expression Math Reasoning Math Calculation Basic Reading Reading

Comprehension Reading Fluency

Not primarily result of: Visual, hearing, or

motor impairment Mental Retardation Emotional Disturbance Cultural Factors Environmental or

economic disadvantage

Limited English Proficiency

SLD Categories SLD Exclusionary Clauses

Page 22: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

IDEA: ED Information

Inability to: Learn not explained by

intellectual, sensory, or health factors

Build and maintain interpersonal relationships

Inappropriate types of behavior

General pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression

Tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears

Includes psychosis

Socially maladjusted

Individuals with mild or temporary issues

Covert (must be able to observe it)

What is it… (one or more of following) What it is not…

Page 23: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Additional Cases of note . . . Hobson vs. Hanson

Ruled tracking system (based on culturally biased test data) was de facto segregation

Diana vs. State Board of Education Children must be tested in their native language

Larry P. vs. Riles IQ tests were determined to be too biased to use

for African American students (in California) Parents can have these tests used with special

permissions. Hudson vs. Rowley

Defined appropriate education (not ideal)

Page 24: Ethics and Law for school Psychologists

Discussion Scenario A parent refuses to allow for a psychological

evaluation. The school went to a due process hearing where an evaluation was approved. The child was diagnosed with TBI due to head injuries obtained from an abusive ex-step-father. During the IEP meeting, the mother wanted the school to pay the child’s bills for specialized, experimental treatments outside of the school. In addition, during the meeting, she reports that she has started seeing the ex-step-father again (they are thinking of getting back together).