ETAP FAQ Arc Flash Calculations

8/8/2019 ETAP FAQ Arc Flash Calculations

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/etap-faq-arc-flash-calculations 1/7

TAP FAQ # 23 - What are the most common roadblocks to finding Fault Clearing Time in arc flash calculations?

ETAP FAQ # 23

What are the most common roadblocks to finding Fault Clearing Time in arc flash calculations?

scription: Seven most common reasons why the Arc Flash program cannot automatically determine the Fault Clearing Time

rsion: ETAP 5.5.0

blished: June 30, 2006

AP eliminates the manual work related to determining the protective device(s) that clear arc faults and the Fault Clearingme (FCT). In some situations, the program provides a message that reads: “FCT not determined.” This message indicatest ETAP did not have enough data to find a protective device in the path that energizes the equipment, or it was missinga for determining FCT.

s article summarizes the seven most common reasons why ETAP will display this message and how to troubleshootsystem to pinpoint the reason(s).

ease note that when ETAP can’t determine the FCT from the upstream protective devices due to the sevenadblocks presented in this article, it will use the bus user-defined FCT to calculate the incident energy with a flag in the

put report indicating this action. This article assumes that the user-defined FCT in the bus editor has been set to zero.

There are no source protective devices configured to protect the arc fault location. If you have not added the

tective device which actually de-energizes the equipment in the event of a fault, the program may display the messageCT not determined.” In the image below, the utility connection does not have a protective device. If there is a fault on thee side of the medium voltage breakers, there is no physical protective device that can clear the fault. If the bus “user-ined FCT” is also set to zero, you will see “FCT not determined” displayed on the one-line diagram, as well as on reports

d arc flash labels.

The circuit breaker interlock for the relay is missing or there is no data selected from the library. Some

tective devices require a relay to trip them, like high-, medium- and some low-voltage circuit breakers. ETAPermines automatically which relay will trip and in which order, but it requires that users specify which breaker is interlockedhe relay (which breaker will be tripped by the relay selected by ETAP). If you did not select the protective device from library, a message will appear alerting you that the FCT cannot be determined. This applies to LVCB, Relays, Fuses, etc.




Arcing current is too low to trip the protective devices. The arcing current is typically less than the available bolted

ort-circuit current for some equipment, especially for low voltage systems. According to IEEE 1584 equations, theing current may be less than the short circuit current for systems up to 15 kV. Because of this phenomenon, the

otective devices may not trip at all under an arc fault. ETAP includes the arcing current variation automatically to further

uce the calculated current. If ETAP detects that the source protective device does not trip, then it will display the“FCT

determined” message.




he case of a fault at “Bus30,” the arcing current is too low on the primary side of Transformer “T9.” To determine the

ing current on the primary of T9, take the ratio of the SC contribution over the total SC current and multiply the totaling current by this ratio.

(34.33 kA/35.3 kA) * 24.27 kA = 23.59 kA

en convert to the primary base kV.

23.58 kA * (0.48kV/13.2kV) = 0.857 kA

he calculated arcing current on the primary is too low for “Relay28” to trip, you can confirm this by plotting the relay on aar view TCC. In the TCC shown below, the red arrow indicates the arcing current value at the beginning of the fault. Thisarly shows that the relay does not trip.

metimes the protective device will still trip, but it will do so in the overcurrent protection section of the relay. In this case,AP will calculate the potential incident energy released and will flag it on the one-line diagram with a messageting: “Exceeds Max. PPE Arc Rating.” This message indicates that the FCT was determined, but is too long, and thusenergy released exceeds the maximum value specified by NFPA 70E Category 4. This is the case for a fault at “Bus14.”




The Source Protective Device is outside the Search Zone. To reduce the calculation time and optimize the

mputer system requirements, a user-defined limit is provided by ETAP for finding the source protective device. Thisit indicates the number of bus levels away from the faulted bus that ETAP will search to find the source protective device.e source protective device is then used to determine the FCT.

e default value for the bus levels is 3. In some systems, the protective devices could be placed more than three busels away and thus a bigger search zone is required. If the program does not find all the corresponding source

otective devices within 3 bus levels, it would again show the message “FCT not determined.”

ETAP 5.0.3, the way to increase the search level (bus levels away from the fault) is to add the following entry to the ETAPS.file, below the [Etap PowerStation] header:

MaxSourceIfLevel=6

ETAP 5.5.0, the same can be accomplished from the new “ETAP Preferences” tool. You can launch the ETAPeferences from Tools menu bar and then locate the entry:

Bus Levels Away To Find Source PD

u can modify this entry to 10 or higher (up to 20 bus levels away).




e following image illustrates the concept of bus levels and the search zones for finding the source protective device for alt at the indicated bus.

The source protective device is completely outside the search area of the program. For some very special cases,

AP Arc Flash will not be able to determine the FCT if the source protective device cannot be located. This means thatsystem does not have protection within the searchable area of the system. The following image highlights the location ofnon-searchable part of the network for a fault at the indicated bus:




you can see, there are several protective devices which would clear the fault, and the situation where all the PDs areside the searchable area is quite unlikely.

The bolted 3-phase fault current is outside the range allowed by IEEE 1584. There are certain limitations in the

EE model. One of them is the limitation on the available short-circuit current. The bolted fault current must be within thege of 0.7 to 106 kA. If the fault current falls outside this range, then the arc flash results are not valid based on the

ailable equations. If the program detects this situation, the “FCT not determined” message will be displayed as shown in image below:

cording to IEEE 1584, it is very difficult to sustain an arc at voltages nearing 0.208 kV and thus for lower values it may notnecessary to calculate the incident energy. If the transformer feeding this fault is higher than 125 kVA it may be desirableestimate the incident energy even if the nominal voltage is less. For these situations, assuming a 0.208 kV with the




me available short-circuit current may yield conservative results. This is an engineering decision that must be made forch specific situation and OSHA requirements.

The bus nominal kV is outside the range allowed by IEEE 1584. The empirical method is only valid for voltages higher

n 0.208 kV (kV LL). The arc flash results are not valid for voltage levels lower than this value. ETAP detects this situationd it will show the “FCT not determined” message. The following image illustrates this point:

http://etap.com/

Documents

ETAP FAQ Arc Flash Calculations