Upload
lillian-orr
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ESPON Action 1.1.3
Enlargement of the European Union and the
wider European perspective as regards its
polycentric spatial structure
Lead partner Royal Institute of TechnologyDept of Infrastructure
• Nordregio, Stockholm
• Institute of Community Studies/Casa, London
• ÖIR, Wien
• Spiekermann & Wegener, Dortmund
• Karelian Institute, Joensuu
• NTUA, Athens
• TNO Inro, Delft• CEDRU, Lisboa• ITPS, Stockholm• Prague Inst for Global
Urban Development, Praha
• Stanislaw Leszczycki Institute of Geography, Warszawa
ODEN- with Raven
PartnersHugin and Munin
In the Nordic mythology, Oden was the omniscient god, depending on his two flying messengers Hugin and Munin. Oden had sacrificed one of his own eyes to get full access to the knowledge accumulated in Mimer´s well. Oden also researched tacit and historic knowledge hanging under the branches of Yggdrasil, the World Tree.
ODENKick-off January 24-25 2003
Options for spatially balanced Developments in the ENlargement of
the EU
ESPON Action 1.1.3
Agenda Friday Jan 24
14.00 Words of Welcome Folke Snickars14.05 ESPON update Peter Mehlbye14.30 Research Programme Lars Olof Persson 15.00 Partners’ presentations (max. 15 min each). 18.00 Preliminary Work plan Lars Olof Persson18.30 Comments Peter Mehlbye • 5. Policy recommendations20.00 Dinner together at ”Tennstopet”
Saturday January 25, 2003
9.00 Towards a common conceptual and methodological framework. Introductions followed by discussion. Chair: Folke Snickars 12.00 Light lunch 13.00 Work plan Lars Olof Persson14.30 Practicalities Lisa van Well15.00 End of Workshop Evening on own
5 WPs
• 1. Conceptual Framework
• 2. Data & indicators
• 3. Diagnosis: Spatial tissue, polycentrism, discontinuties in CCs and border regions
• 4. Spatial impact of enlargement
ODEN´s Geographical Scope
New EU Periphery and beyond
Candidates
New external and internal border regions
Global integration zones
EU 15
Geo Focus
Less favoured regions Urban nodes
NO and CH
• Polycentricity and R-U in CC contexts
• Transition and Transformation
• Convergence within the Enlarged EU
• Accessibility
• Barriers
• Institutions
WP 1 Developing the Theoretical Framework and
Methods
• Co-ordination
• Availability and Comparability CC data
• Collection
• Selection of Indicators
• Quantitative focus but also Qualitative Approaches
WP 2 Data and Indicators
WP 3 Diagnosis of Spatial Structures in CCs and Border
regions• Flows, interaction, accessibility
• Identification of functional links/institutional barriers
• Emerging networks of cities, polycentricity,
• Co-operation and integration processes
• Convergence/divergence, wealth distribution
• On sectoral structure, GDP, trade, investment, employment, migration in the regions
• Focus on least favoured and border region
• 2 scenario studies: Trends impacting Spatial Economy, Social Structures and Ecol Capital
• Impact Assessment of TEN and TINA
WP 4 Spatial Impact of Enlargement on the EU and
Accession Countries
Based on Diagnosis and Scenario WPs:
• Policy options for balanced spatial development
• Territorial cohesion
• Stakeholders’ participation and negotiations
• Need for diversified policy intervention
• SF after 2006
WP 5 Policy recommendations
Time-table Jan 2003-Dec 2005Interim report 1March 2003
Interim report 2August 2003
Interim report 3August 2004
Final reportDecember 2005
WP1 Overview concepts, method.
Expanded terms and methodology
WP2 Data, indicators needed, to be col-lected, mapmaking
Additional data collection accession countries
Processing new database,
More identification of indicators, mm method
WP3 Prel, results of EU spatial tissue, structure in CC
Enlarg. Effects on CC, Update spat. tissue, structure, analysis cities, regions
Prov. Final results on urban nodes, polycentrism, complementarities etc.
Deepening knowledge spatial tissue in CC
WP4 Hypotheses on spattal effects
Prel, indication spatial effects on enlargement
Provision diagnose spatial effects of enlarg. On EU and CC
Final diagnose, impact of enlargement on EU and CC
WP5 Indication policy recommendations
Networking and coop.proposal, policy results
Provision policy results
Final policy recommendationExecutive summ.
Work plan Jan-Aug 2003
Jan.- March 2003 Substantive: WP1 , WP2, WP3, WP5 started Practical: Contract signed between LP and Partners
March-August 2003 Substantive: WP4 started, other WPs continued Practical: First funds requested by invoice: July 2003
First Interim Report: March 31, 2003Second Interim Report: August 31, 2003
1st Interim report – Content & inputs
WP1. Terms & Methodology – 1st list
Saturday discussion
& partner input
WP2. Indicators, data and maps – 1st list
Nordregio + partner consensus
WP3. Qual. hypotheses on problems/options on flows and current spatial structure in CC
Literature review input from AP
WP4. Qual. hypotheses on
Spatial effects on enlargement
Literature review input from AP
WP5. 1st Indications of policy recommendations
Addendum
• Adress data collection
• Justification of scenarios
• CC institutions as real partners
• Operational reports