Upload
duongnguyet
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11
ESOH Challenges in Commissioning an Aircraft Carrier
Brief 7832Doug Parrish
Booz Allen HamiltonE2S2 Conference May 2009, Denver
22
Outline• Background• Complex operational environment.• Manning challenges.• Design/contract challenges.• Equipment challenges.• Specific ESOH challenges.• Hazardous materials.• Safety equipment.• Training.
33
Background: Changes over time.
Photo: Anon.
Photo: US Navy Photo: US Navy
Photo: US Navy
Photo: US Navy
44
Old style of building ships not normally used today- for multiple reasons. Photo: Battleship.Org
Construction Methods Change Over Time
66
Why do we have carriers?Purpose of an aircraft carrier: Force projection (i.e., drop bombs on target in geographically remote locations.
USS CONSTELLATION (exCV-64).Photo: US Navy
99
The Construction Process
• Busy place. NGNN has 1000+ cranes, many forklifts, 3 shifts of operation, 19k+ employees. –COMMERCIAL YARD!
• Carrier takes 5+ years to build. Some crew there ~2 years prior to commissioning, phased manning.
• Carrier build ~$5.5B & ~ 50M manhours.• + Later outfitting + modernization.
1010
NIMITZ Class (CVN-68)• Builder: Newport News Shipbuilding Co, NGNN/NGSB.• CVN-68 Deployed: May 3, 1975. • Unit Cost: ~ $4.5B each, + planes & supplies.• Propulsion: 2 nuclear reactors, 4 shafts.• Length: 1,092 ft • Beam: 134 ft• Flight Deck Width: 252 ft• Displacement: ~ 97k tons (88k metric tons) full load.• Speed: 30+ knots (34.5+ mph).• Crew: Ship's Company: 3,200 - Air Wing: 2,480. • Aircraft: 85
1111
Changes on CVN-77 vs CVN-68• CVN-77 is “evolved” or transitional CVN-68
design. CVN-78 = CVN-21 advanced design.• Major improvements from her predecessors,
including:– Bulbous bow.– Redesigned island and integral weapons elevator. – Composite mast. – Three-wire arresting gear configuration. – Fresh water, vacuum system sewage capture &
treatment plant.• Plan for EMALS not incorporated, technology
was not mature.
1212
E-2C in the wire. Photo: US Navy
USS RONALD REAGAN (CVN-76).Photo US Navy
F-18F SuperHornet. Photo: US Navy
1313
CNV-77: Significant Commitment of Resources
• Top of mast- 20 stories above waterline (244 ft).• 4.5 acre flight deck. • 1,092 feet long: nearly as long as the Empire
State Building is tall. • Four bronze propellers, each 21 feet across and
30+ tons. • Steering accomplished by two rudders, each 29
feet by 22 feet, 50 tons in weight. • Four high speed aircraft elevators, 4,000+
square feet in area, bring planes to the flight deck from the hangar below.
1414
CNV-77: Significant Commitment of Resources
• 47,000 tons of structural steel and about 1M lbs of aluminum used in the ship’s construction.
• Modular construction process forms large individual units of the ship much like interlocking building blocks.
• Units welded together to form a module or superlift weighing up to 900 tons.
1515
CVN-77 Capacity
• Home to about 6,000 Navy personnel. • Enough food and supplies to operate for 90
days: 18,150 meals served daily.• Distillation plants providing 400,000 gallons of
fresh water from sea water daily, enough for 2,000 homes.
• Nearly 30,000 light fixtures and 1,600 miles of cable and wiring.
• 1,400 telephones, 14,000 pillowcases and 28,000 sheets.
1616
The Ship• Top speed 30+ knots (35+ MPH).
• 2 nuclear reactors, operate 20+ years without refueling.
• Conventional diesel ship burns ~ 270k gallons of fuel per day during flight operations.–CVN’s not tied to oil cargo ships like CV’s.
• ~50 years lifespan.
• Three two-inch diameter arresting wires on the flight deck bring an airplane going 150 MPH to a stop in < 400 ft (i.e., mobile airport).
1717
Manning Challenges• Few people initially. Everyone has
multiple jobs.• As Safety Dept and rest man up, most are
not trained for primary and collateral duties.
• First ship or carrier tour for many.• Safety Dept = TAD bodies.
1818
Design/Contract Challenges• 1970s Design.
– Little changed from first NIMITZ design.– Shipalts/mods not normally done at yard,
wait on PSA/SRA.– “As designed/built” to pass INSURV/Navy
Acceptance Trials, then some items ripped out/replaced/modernized at SRA.
»Wet Chemistry Photolab.– FORD CVN-78 design ~complete, little Fleet
input. »Too late to input ESOH problems now/ not
in contract.
1919
BUSH, 2nd with new bulbous bow
Photo: Northrop Grumman
750 ton lift. New design more efficient.
2424
Schedule• Keel laid: Sep 03• First crew onboard: Jun 06
– 25% ~Dec 06– 50% ~ Jun 07– 75% ~ Jan 08
• Light off reactor Jul 08• Crew moveaboard Aug 08• Commissioning Jan 09• Builder’s Trials Feb 09• Navy Acceptance Trials Mar 09• SRA/PSA Mar 09• Workups/FCT late 09• First Cruise late 2010
2929
Equipment Challenges
• Buy initial outfitting items, no gear comes with the job.
• AELs are wrong.• Supply Dept undermanned, no HAZMAT
program.• RPPO untrained.• Byzantine supply system (not standard
methodology).• No hazmat spill kit nor ability to respond.
3030
Specific ESOH Challenges
• Getting people to wear PPE.• Constant training challenges- new people,
new equipment, new systems, complex operations.
• Commercial yards have their own rules- some are arbitrary.
• Navy DOES NOT OWN THE SHIP, DOES NOT OWN THE YARD.– Barge, rented offices, Huntington Hall,
remote parking lots.
3232
Specific ESOH Challenges
• Shipyard owns emergency (medical, spill, fire, environmental) response until after crew move-aboard.
• While working aboard, Navy crew follows yard rules- if we know/understand them.
• SUPSHIP is intermediary.
3333
HAZMAT Challenges• One BM2/9595 for first year (Jul06-Dec07).• No AUL, limited visibility on ordering.• SERVMART provides HAZMAT- which
may be fine for shore offices but not usable onboard.
• Safety Dept BM1/SK1 9595- late arrivals (Mar08).
• Have/use HAZMAT before program in place. – No training, Hazcomm standard, PPE,
disposal, spill kits, or storage.
3434
Safety Equipment
• Receive just prior to builder’s trials.• 195 List/Exclusion Items:
– EEBDs & SCBAs.– Bull’s Eyes, CCOLs, SIB.– Fire fighting equipment.– Ladder chains.– Nonskid decks.– Deck coverings & deck markings.– Warning Labels/SOPS/Operator Placards.
3535
Training Challenges
• Many new, unique, untried systems.• Navy crew doesn’t own systems, yard
does initially.• Vendor prepares maintenance + training
pubs- often late in the game.• Crew must be trained/prepared for ATG
Crew Certification, Builders and Navy Acceptance Trials.
3636
Recommendations• Standardize and implement consistent,
timely SSWGs and allow changes to contract and design early in design cycle.
• More fleet/user community involvement, earlier- and USE their suggestions.
• Make and use passdown/lessons learned.• More SUPSHIP oversight during all
phases of build process.• Get engineers out on site, get them
familiar with environment and operational needs.
3737
Summary• Background• Complex operational environment.• Manning challenges.• Design/contract challenges.• Equipment challenges.• Specific ESOH challenges.• Hazardous materials.• Safety equipment.• Training.
3838
Questions?One Mission, One Vision, One Team, One Fight!
ESOH Challenges In Commissioning an Aircraft Carrier
Questions?Questions?
3939
Contact info
Douglas K. ParrishPhD, CIH, CSP, REHSBooz Allen Hamilton Stafford Commerce Center, Suite 10325 Center StreetStafford, VA 22556Phone (540) 288-5126Fax (540) [email protected]