Upload
dinhdiep
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ESMAP Strategic Business Plan (2008ESMAP Strategic Business Plan (2008––2013)2013)
Amarquaye Armar
1
Amarquaye ArmarProgram Manager, ESMAP
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– ESMAP Results Framework ESMAP Results Framework
ESMAP ESMAP M & E M & E
SystemSystem
ESMAP ESMAP ProgramProgramDelivery Delivery Cycle Cycle
ESMAP ESMAP ThematicThematic
2
Priorities Priorities
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– Global Energy ChallengesGlobal Energy Challenges Organized around three interlinked, global thematic challenges: energy security, poverty reduction, and climate change.
Primary role is to provide client countries with high quality TA to enable them to better plan, manage and regulate energy sector development, taking into account global thematic challenges
Energy Climate
Energy - Poverty Reduction Nexus
Energy Security
Energy - Climate Change Nexus
3
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– ESMAP Thematic PrioritiesESMAP Thematic Priorities “upstream” interventions to increase capacity of client countries – low and middle
income countries - to plan, manage and regulate implementation of policies, strategies and programs to deliver clean, reliable and affordable energy services.
S i
energy supply diversification &
g p g , gy
Energy SecurityVolatility of global energy markets increases vulnerability of energy sector entities
energy efficiency
ulti
-Sec
tor,
ache
s
Energy & Poverty ReductionMore than 1.5 billion people still lack access to electricity
energy access expansion & pro-poortargeting of subsidies
ehen
sive
, M
uW
in”
App
roa
Energy & Climate Changeenergy system
de-carbonization &
Com
pre
“Win
-W
4
Energy & Climate ChangeEmissions from energy consumption keep increasing unless transformational actions take place
de-carbonization &adaptation
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– ESMAP Results Framework ESMAP Results Framework
ESMAP ESMAP ProgramProgramDelivery Delivery
5
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– ESMAP Program Delivery CycleESMAP Program Delivery Cycle
AA activities to deliver high quality
Think Tank
AA activities to deliver high quality advice to influence policy-making by client countries
OperationalLeveraging K l d h t
KnowledgeClearinghouse
Just-in-time TA activities to help client countries translate strategies and programs into results on the ground
Leveraging Knowledge exchange events and training to build client country capacity to plan, manage and regulate strategies and programsresults on-the-ground p g
6
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– Program OrganizationProgram Organization
Consultative GroupEnergy Trust Funded
Programs
Technical AdvisoryGroup
ESMAP Program Management
Program Manager Thematic Coordinators Knowledge Management Team Knowledge Management Team Resource Management Team
ESMAP Global Practice Groups
World Bank SDN
Anchor Units
World Bank Regional
Energy Units
7
gy
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– Program Implementation MatrixProgram Implementation Matrix
ESMAP ProgramESMAP Program Management includes Thematic Coordinators.
ESMAP leverages WBG-embedded Implementation Matrix Organization comprises of the ESMAP Global Practiceof the ESMAP Global Practice Group, the Sector Anchor Units of the WBG Sustainable Development Vice-Presidency (SDN Anchors) and the Regional Energy Units.
ESMAP Partnerships are necessary to more effectively
8
y ypursue synergistic opportunities and achieve globally sustainable outcomes.
Program Delivery Framework Program Delivery Framework ESMAP Global Practice GroupESMAP Global Practice Group
Energy and Poverty Reduction Thematic Coordinator
Energy Security Thematic Coordinator
Energy and Climate Change Thematic Coordinator
ESMAP GlobalPractice GroupPractice Group
SDN Anchor
Multi‐Year Initiatives
Units
Annual Block Grants
Regional EnergyUnits
Annual Block Grants
9
Partnerships PartnershipsPartnerships
ESMAP Energy Efficiency ESMAP Energy Efficiency Cities Initiative (EECI)Cities Initiative (EECI)( )( )
10
ESMAP EECIESMAP EECI–– Facts and FiguresFacts and Figures
By 2030:
gg
yAlmost ¾ of energy use and GHG will come from cities 40
60
80
81% of urban energy demand increases will come from non-OECD
0
20
City Energy Use City GHGEmissions
City Populations
2006
2030 (proj.)
2006
citiesDeveloping countries will triple their built-up urban
2030 (proj.)
2006 2030 (proj.)
area City Energy Use 67% 73%
City GHG Emissions 70% 73%
City Populations 50% 60%
11
ESMAP Renewable Energy Market ESMAP Renewable Energy Market Transformation Initiative (REMTI)Transformation Initiative (REMTI)( )( )
Di t N l R di tiDirect Normal Radiation:
Average daily KWh per square meter0 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5 - 6 6 - 7 7 - 8 8 - 9
12
ESMAP REMTIESMAP REMTI–– Aligning “climateAligning “climate--oriented” trust fundsoriented” trust funds
ESMAP: Capacity Building & Knowledge Sharing
ESMAP: Capacity Building & Knowledge Sharing
Policy &
Aligning climateAligning climate oriented trust fundsoriented trust funds
Resource Assessment
Strategy Developmen
t
yInstitutional
Building/ Financial
framework
Pilot & Demonstratio
n ProjectsScale up
CTFCTF
CPFCPF
GEFGEF
SREP*SREP*SREP* core roles
SREP*SREP*
ESMAP - REMTI
are in the Pilot and Scale up stages
13
Available Not Available Partially Available Undecided.
ESMAP Gender & Energy Initiative: ESMAP Gender & Energy Initiative: Mainstreaming Gender Sensitive ApproachesMainstreaming Gender Sensitive Approaches
Think TankThink TankGender and Energy Flagship Study: ascertain value-added for energy sector of gender sensitive
h th h t f i i lapproaches through assessment of empirical research findings. Gender, Energy and Climate Change Assessment: To identify gaps in addressing gender sensitive aspects of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies and develop appropriateadaptation strategies, and develop appropriate intervention approaches
Knowledge ClearinghouseKnowledge ClearinghouseGuidance Note: To prepare a Guidance Note for
t ff h t i t t th denergy staff on how to integrate the gender dimension within their projectsGender and Energy Toolkit – a “how to” handbook for using a gender sensitive approach in energy projects, including a monitoring and evaluation frameworkframework
Operational LeveragingOperational LeveragingPilot Activities: “Mainstreaming Gender” considerations into scale-up of Energy SME PilotsAFREA “M i t i G d ” id ti
14
AFREA: “Mainstreaming Gender” considerations into biomass energy & electrification components.
Program Delivery Framework Program Delivery Framework SDN Anchor Units & Regional Energy UnitsSDN Anchor Units & Regional Energy Units
Energy and Poverty Reduction Thematic Coordinator
Energy Security Thematic Coordinator
Energy and Climate Change Thematic Coordinator
ESMAP GlobalPractice GroupPractice Group
SDN Anchor
Multi‐Year Grants
Units
Annual Block Grants
Regional EnergyUnits
Annual Block Grants
15
Partnerships PartnershipsPartnerships
ESMAP/DEC Rural Electrification ESMAP/DEC Rural Electrification Impacts M & E ProgramImpacts M & E Programp gp g
Bangladesh
Vietnam
India
Peru Peru
Africa (Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, Cameroon)
16
ESMAP/DEC Rural Electrification ESMAP/DEC Rural Electrification Impacts M & E ProgramImpacts M & E Program
Development of impact assessment and M&E methods for rural electrification
Rural Electrification - Evidence from Vietnam
• a significant impact on rural welfare
p gp g
programs
Piloting new methods in Peru, Vietnam, Bangladesh, and India as a part of World B k l l t ifi ti j t
• direct impact on income through a variety of channels, including farm and non-farm income
• strongest impact on school attendance by children and this is true for both boys and girls
i t hi h t d i fi t f d i t lBank rural electrification projects,
Training for data collection firms, government officials, and agencies to use more effective survey tools and analysis
• impacts highest during first few years and incremental benefits level off after 9 years
more effective survey tools and analysis techniques,
Partnerships with local stakeholderssuch as Institute of Sociology—Vietnam
Rural Electrification - Evidence from Bangladesh
• strong and robust impact for both economic and educational outcomessuch as Institute of Sociology—Vietnam,
and National Council of Advanced Economic Research--India.
Dissemination through, workshops,
• significant improvement in both completed schooling years and study time for children in rural households
• rich households that adopt electricity receive higher benefits than poor households
17
Dissemination through, workshops, publications and peer reviewed articles • Benefits of RE exceed cost by more than 150 percen
ESMAP CEIF Special Program ESMAP CEIF Special Program –– GG+5+5 Low Carbon Country StudiesLow Carbon Country Studies
LCC Studies in Brazil, China, India Mexico, and South Africa, with DFID s pport of £1 5 msupport of £1.5 m– Analytic work, capacity building and
knowledge dissemination– Exchange of learning tools,
k l d d b t tiknowledge and best practice
ProgressMexico study is nearly completeMexico study is nearly complete, while the ones for the remaining countries is expected to be complete between May to December 2009.Planning models de eloped for IndiaPlanning models developed for India and Brazil have wider application.Best practice notes, workshops, websites, interactive training, are
Source: 3ra. Comunicación Nacional, Mexico
18
gplanned
Business-as-usual
Deforestation Modelling is ready: Deforestation Modelling is ready: collaboration with UFMGcollaboration with UFMG Business as usual
19
ESMAP CEIF Special ProgramESMAP CEIF Special Program–– Africa Renewable Energy Access (AFREA) Africa Renewable Energy Access (AFREA)
Designed to directly support and create enabling conditions
FY2009 Allocations under AFREA Program (in $ Million)
Recepient Executed
Bank Executed FY09 allocated
gy ( )gy ( )
gfor increased renewable energy investments and expanding access to modern energy in Africa Rw anda Sust.
Energy. Dev. Project
Rw anda Lake KivuMethane-to-pow er
Project
gy
US $3.6 million already transferred for 4 activities since January 2009 Electrif ication
Sustainable BiomassInitiative
January 2009
Planned FY09-11 transfers add up to $27.3 million for 8
Portfolio Approach toDistributedGeneration
Opportunities
Initiative
pactivities.
More than two thirds of the program to be recepient
Energy Investment &Policy Prospectus
GenderMainstreaming
20
program to be recepient executed TA grants
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Lighting Africa
$ Million
ESMAP CEIF Special ProgramESMAP CEIF Special Program–– Lighting Africa Initiative Lighting Africa Initiative g gg g
Program Manager, World Bank
Program Manager, IFC
Program Manager, Accra, Ghana
Market Research ($1.2m)
DM and Lighting Africa
Conferences ($0.8m)
Clean Development Mechanism
($0.2m)
Communications and Knowledge
($0.1m)
Program Management
($0.2m)
Quality Assurances
($0.6m )
Development Market place
Awards ($3.1m)
Lighting Africa is World Bank Group initiative aimed at helping 250 million people in SSA to gain access to clean, affordable, safe and reliable modern lighting products
6 activities with total funding of US $ 6 1 million; ESMAP funding of US $0 6 million
21
6 activities with total funding of US $ 6.1 million; ESMAP funding of US $0.6 million Co-funding Partners include PPIAF, GEF, IFC, ASTAE
ESMAP INFRA Support Program ESMAP INFRA Support Program –– Country Vulnerability AssessmentsCountry Vulnerability Assessments
ESMAP funds country energy sector vulnerability assessments INFRA T f I t tivulnerability assessments Gauge the impact of the global credit crisis on the
power sector Re-evaluate supply-demand gap Identify priority project pipeline Ascertain funding constraints/shortfalls
Improving the efficiency of current spending
– Technical advice for identification and prioritization of projects
INFRA-Type of Interventions
Ascertain funding constraints/shortfalls
3-4 countries selected per WB operational region
p p j– Technical advice for strategic
planning – Monitoring composition of capex and
opex to ensure minimum standards of maintenance
East Asia pilots - completed assessments (Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines)
Middle-East pilots – assessment underway (Egypt Jordan Morocco Tunisia)
Enhancing governance– Technical advice to help restructure
and renegotiate PPPs – Safeguards to avoid mis-allocation of
resources and to enhance accountability(Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia)
South Asia pilots – assessments planned (India, Bangladesh)
LAC il t t l d
accou ab y
Mitigating the impact on the poor– Review of investment plan and
incentive schemes for PPPs– Designing “smart” subsidies
22
LAC pilots – assessments planned (Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Jamaica)
ESMAP INFRA Diagnostics Special Program ESMAP INFRA Diagnostics Special Program –– Country Vulnerability AssessmentsCountry Vulnerability Assessments
Pre-Crisis Funding ti t
WB estimate b d t
Funding Secured th h d 2008
Funding Gap 2009 10estimate
2009-13US$ millions
based on post-crisis demand
2009-10US$ millions
through end 2008US$ millions
2009-10US$ millions
EVN, Vietnam 7,847 3,897 2,553 787
Additional funding needs of US$ 557
mln in 2011-13
PLN, Indonesia 8,071 4,333 3,047 1,286
PSALMTransco Philippines [NPC Debt Overhang, Transco costs, stranded costs]
PSALM NPC Debt Repayment
Obligation 2009-13US$ millions
PSALM NPC Debt Repayment
Obligation 2009-10US$ millions
Privatization Proceeds through
end 2008US$ millions
Funding Gap net of privatization
proceeds of US$ 2,190 mln 2009-10
$
Additional funding needs of US$ 1,010
mln net of privatizationstranded costs] US$ millions
5,280 3,750 935 1,560
mln net of privatization proceeds in 2011
Total 21,198 11,980 6,535 3,633
23 4
Program Delivery Framework Program Delivery Framework PartnershipsPartnerships
Energy and Poverty Reduction Thematic Coordinator
Energy Security Thematic Coordinator
Energy and Climate Change Thematic Coordinator
ESMAP GlobalPractice GroupPractice Group
SDN Anchor
Multi‐Year Grants
Units
Annual Block Grants
Regional EnergyUnits
Annual Block Grants
24
Partnerships PartnershipsPartnerships
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Internal Partnerships (GPPs)Internal Partnerships (GPPs)
Window 3: Energy Strategy TA (Slum Upgrading Action Plans)
Window 1: Joint Study of “EnergyIssues & Options for Urbanization”
Window 2: Energy Strategy TA(City Development Strategies)
Issues & Options for Urbanization”
25
Demand-responsive co-funding of client-executed activities under operational leveraging function.
Think TankPartnership
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Internal Partnerships (GPPs)Internal Partnerships (GPPs)
Energy Management AuditsEnergy Management Toolkit (IBNET Benchmarking Activities)(IBNET Toolkit Upgrade)
Energy Management Training(IBNET Water Utility Associations)
26
Demand-responsive co-funding of client-executed activities under knowledge clearinghouse function.
KnowledgeClearinghouse
Partnership
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Internal Partnerships (GPPs)Internal Partnerships (GPPs)
Phase 1: Field Assessment of Energy SME Pilots (Bolivia, Nicaragua, Peru)
Phase 3: Joint Action Plan
Phase 2: Formulate Energy SME sustainability strategy,(leveraging InfoDev Business Incubation andIFC-SME Toolkits)
for Energy SMEs
27
Joint planning and execution of client-executed activities under operational leveraging function.
OperationalLeveragingPartnership
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– ESMAP Results Framework ESMAP Results Framework
ESMAP ESMAP M & E SystemM & E Systemyy
28
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Projected Budget (by function)Projected Budget (by function)j g ( y )j g ( y )
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Lessons Learned Over 26 years?Lessons Learned Over 26 years?yy
30
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Key challenges (earmarking of contributions)!Key challenges (earmarking of contributions)!
14 016.018.0
Declining contributions
y g ( g )y g ( g )
6 08.0
10.012.014.0
$ M
illio
n
gto core for annual block grants to anchor and regional units
0.02.04.06.0
2007 2008 2009
regional units
Increasing contributions for programmatic
80%90%
100%
for programmatic initiatives by ESMAP
One time contribution for
20%30%40%50%60%70%
CEIF
31
0%10%
2007 2008 2009
Current Core MDTF
CEIF MDTF EE/RE TFs
Annual Block Grant:Annual Block Grant: FY09 Financial Summary as of April 17, 2009FY09 Financial Summary as of April 17, 2009Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Key challenges (underKey challenges (under--utilization of funds)!utilization of funds)!y g (y g ( ))
32
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– CG’s Guidance on ESMAP M&E SystemCG’s Guidance on ESMAP M&E System
ESMAP M&E framework and methodology d t b
yy
needs to be:– Robust and provide appropriate type and level of
information for annual review function of CG Meetingg– Compatible with log-frame processes of donors– Less focused on quantitative outputs and more on
outcomesoutcomes
ESMAP M&E system should enable CGESMAP M&E system should enable CG maintain sufficient balance between (past) accountability and (future) lesson learning.
33
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– ResultsResults--based, Independent, Impartial M&E Systembased, Independent, Impartial M&E System
MonitoringClarify Objectives
Evaluation– Assess causal contributions of
, p , p y, p , p y
– Clarify Objectives– Translate objectives into
performance indicators and targets
Assess causal contributions of activities to achievement of results
– Analyze why intended results were or were not achieved
targets– Link activities, targets and
resources to objectivesR ti l ll t d t
– Review implementation process, cost efficiency and institutional frameworkId tif i t d d lt ( iti– Routinely collect data on
the indicators and compare results with targetsR t d
– Identify unintended results (positive or negative)
– Provide lessonsHighlight significant– Report progress and
identify issues to be addressedR bj ti
– Highlight significant accomplishments and further program potential
– Offer recommendations for
34
– Renew objectives as may be required
Offer recommendations for replication of results and broader program improvement
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– 3 Year Rolling Plans + M&E Phase3 Year Rolling Plans + M&E Phase--InIn
Multi-year framework to strengthen focus of annual CG meetings on relative priorities for thematic areas, in line with rapidly changing global environment.
Programmatic M&E system to be phased-in to capture outcomes
35
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--2013 2013 –– Program Implementation TracksProgram Implementation Tracks
2-track approach is endorsed:
– Anchor & Regional Energy Units follow indicate 3-year plans, reflecting thematic balance most appropriate for particular region
– ESMAP GPG follows 3-year plans for each “global multi-year initiative”.
36
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Next Steps for M&E System?Next Steps for M&E System?
CG validates ESMAP outcomes to be monitored
p yp y
and evaluated (May, 2009)
Develop indicators and related targets for each of the core function areas and programs; confirm with internal partners/ clients (May-October 2009)
E t bli h d t ll ti t dEstablish data collection arrangements and timetable (December 2009)
R t th l h f th M&E tReport on the launch of the new M&E system (CG Meeting, 2010)
37
Strategic Business Plan 2008Strategic Business Plan 2008--20132013–– Closing Projected Funding GapClosing Projected Funding Gapg j g pg j g p
13.5EE/RE TFs
12 5
1.3
Current Core
CEIF MDTF
12.5
29.1New Core MDTF
MDTF
CG Agreed to Single Core MDTFCG Agreed to Single Core MDTF29.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
New Core MDTF
38
www.esmap.org Thank you!Thank you!