Upload
augustus-johnston
View
219
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ESM Analysis of BioSim Configurations
Izaak Neveln
General Engineering
University of Illinois
Advisors: Haibei Jiang
Professor Luis Rodriguez
Overview
Define ESM
BioSim configurations
Research Method
Results
Conclusions and improvements
The Mystery
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Mission Duration vs. Cost
NonregenerableRegenerable P/CHybridBioregenerable
Mission Duration
Co
st
Shuttle Lunar? Mars?
Equivalent System Mass (ESM)
Proxy for system cost
Simplifies various aspects of system into single
metric
Volume, Power, Cooling, and Crewtime all
converted to mass value with equivalence factors.
Ex. Nuclear Reactor is 1500 kg and produces 3 kW
Peq = (1500 kg) / (3 kW) = 500 kg/kW
BioSim Configuration
eXtensible Markup Language (XML)
Creates system components
Defines store and flow-rate values
Additional attributes (failure and perturbation)
Creates crew and defines crew activity
The Solution
BioSim can determine system reliability
How long does the crew last?
ESM analysis can determine system cost
An ESM calculator integrated with BioSim could
give insight to the values on the mission length vs.
cost graph
But How?
Two Options
XML interpreter for NASA's Excel and Visual Basic
derived Advanced Life Support Sizing Analysis Tool
(ALSSAT)
Coding of a new JAVA based tool
ALSSAT
Courtesy of NASA
ESMcalc
Interface for JAVA based ESMcalc.
Currently has
inputs for mission
length and type, and
takes all XML
configuration values
into consideration.
Does it perform?
A = ALSSAT
B = ESMcalc
CM = Crewmembers
Lunar Surface Mission
100 days
Varied Crew Size
Partially Closed
Based on Christian's water recovery system analysis configuration
2 CM (A)
4 CM (A)
6 CM (A)
8 CM (A)
2 CM (B)
4 CM (B)
6 CM (B)
8 CM (B)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Crew Size Comparison
Water:
Waste:
Thermal:
Food:
Air:
ESM
(kg)
Varied Mission Length
180 (A)
360 (A)
540 (A)
720 (A)
180 (B)
360 (B)
540 (B)
720 (B)
0.00
5000.00
10000.00
15000.00
20000.00
25000.00
30000.00
Time Comparison
Water:
Waste:
Thermal:
Food:
Air:
Mission Length (Days)
ESM
(kg
)
A = ALSSAT
B = ESMcalc
-Mars Transit Mission
-6 Crew Members
-Varied Mission Length
-Partially Closed
-Crop Added
Based on David's semi-closed baseline configuration
Slope Comparison
2 4 6 8
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Varied Crew SizeALSSAT
ESMcalc
Crew Size
ESM
(kg)
180 360 540 720
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Varied Mission Length
Mission Length (Days
ESM
(kg)
Conclusions
No way to physically test results
Trends are accurate with ALSSAT
Lower ESM was expected
Viable tool for comparing costs of BioSim
configurations
Future Work
More tests to further validate the ESMcalc program
More complete statistical analysis with more data
Updating calculator with more accurate models
Give user more options for input and output of
ESMcalc
Acknowledgements and Funding
Thanks to Haibei Jiang, David Kane, Christian
Douglass, Scott Bell, and Professor Luis Rodriguez.
Funded by the NASA Illinois Space Grant
Consortium, the Boeing Company, and NASA grant
number NNJ06HA03G.
Questions?