Upload
dodung
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Escaping the Tyranny of Small Decisions:
A P lA ProposalWarren K. Bickel, Ph.D.
University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
•Supported by NIDA, Wilbur Mills Endowment, Tobacco Settlement Funds
OverviewOverview
• Briefly reflect on mechanisms of b h i l h tbehavioral change concept
• Describe a new conceptual model for understanding challenging behaviors
• Illustrate potential opportunities toIllustrate potential opportunities to exploit new mechanisms of behavioral change derived from this modelchange derived from this model
Mechanisms of BehavioralMechanisms of Behavioral Change
Noch, and Kazdin & Noch propose a , p pfundamentally sound approach– Existing treatments provide the mechanism– Existing treatments provide the mechanismPotential constraints may include:
Tx effects are small or modestTx effects are small or modestTx does not match current theory of
disease or disorder
An Alternative Approach for Mechanism of Behavior
ChangeChange• Treatments or interventions should be
supported by the theory of the disorder(Toplack et al., 2007)
• Changing conceptualization of the• Changing conceptualization of the disease or disorder should force the evaluation of the adequacy of ourevaluation of the adequacy of our treatments, and, in turn, our working theory of the disease/disorder should yimpact our treatment approaches. (Toplack et al., 2007)
“Thence is imposed the task of everywhere seeking out in the natural phenomena those pelements that are the same, and that amid all multiplicity areand that amid all multiplicity are ever present.”
Ernst Mach (1893)Ernst Mach (1893)
The Tyranny of Small y yDecisions
Refers to situations where anRefers to situations where an individual can be victimized by the narrowness of the temporalnarrowness of the temporal context in which he or she exercises choice.
The Tyranny of SmallThe Tyranny of Small Decisions (TSD)
CharacteristicsChoices favor the
Examples• AddictionChoices favor the
immediate valued choice
Addiction• Risky Behaviors (e.g.,
HIV)choiceIgnore long-term consequences
• Debt and the Failure to Save Money Gl b l Cli t Chconsequences • Global Climate Change
• Many Forms of Crime• Obesity• Obesity
Delay DiscountingDelay Discounting
• Refers to the reduction in value of a reinforcer as a function of the delay to reinforcer delivery
• Psychophysical Titration Procedure– Developed by Mazur (1987) with p y ( )
pigeons– Used by Rachlin, Raineri, and Cross
(1991) i h h(1991) with humans
ImmediateAdjusting
Delayed ConstantAdjusting
$1 000 $1 000Procedure
with $1,000 $1,000
$990 $1 000Hypothetical
Money $990 $1,000
$960 $1 000
Money
$960 $1,000
Hyperbolic Decay ModelHyperbolic Decay Model (Mazur, 1987)
V A / (1 + kD)
( )
V = A / (1 + kD)V = Value of reinforcer
A = Amount of reinforcerD = Delay of reinforcerD Delay of reinforcerk = Discounting rate
Smoking vs. Non-Smokingg g)
100
perc
ent
60
80Money Discounting
CurrentExNever
Val
ue (p
40
60
esen
t V
20
40
Pre
00 2000 4000 6000 8000
Delay (days)Bickel et al. (1999)
TSD in 4 Dimensions: Tinbergen’s (1951)
4 explanations4 explanations1. Mechanism-relates specific1. Mechanism relates specific
behavior to brain regions or structures
2 Ontogenetic developmental2. Ontogenetic-developmental changes
3. Functional- how has the b h i d t d t thbehavior adapted to the current environment (culture)
4. Evolutionary-how this ybehavior evolved
Competing Neurobehavioral Decision Systems
Hypothesis:Hypothesis:• Mechanism of TSDMechanism of TSD
– Increased activity of the Impulsive System(motivational)(motivational)
• Limbic Region• Ventral Striatum
– Decreased activity of Executive System(rationality and valuation)
P f t l C t• Prefrontal Cortex • Dorsolaterial Prefrontal Cortex
McClure et al.,,Science, 2004
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressorTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Developmental Pattern ofTemporal Horizon
1
0.1DiscountRate
0.01Rate
0.001
1111 25252020 4545 7070Age
Household SurveyIllicit Drug Use (month)
30
40
50
Marijuana Use (month)
15
20
25
Cocaine Use (month)
1 5
2.0
2.5
0
10
20
30
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 700
5
10
15
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 700.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Age
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Age
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Age
Heavy Alcohol Use (month)
20
25Binge Alcohol Use (month)
40
50Cigarette Use (month)
40
50
5
10
15
10
20
30
10
20
30
40
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 700
Age10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
Age10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
Age
Kowal, Gatchalian, Badger, & Bickel, In prep.
Crime
England and Wales 1842-1844 United States 1990
900 24000
England and Wales 1842 1844
600
700
800
Females 16000
20000
Females
300
400
500Males
8000
12000
Females
Males
0
100
200
0
4000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Homocides
60 900
Canada Chicago
40
50
Females 600
700
800
Females
20
30Males
300
400
500 Males
0
10
0 4 14 0 24 0 34 0 44 0 54 0 64 0 740
100
200
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 40-410.-14
20-2430-34
40-4450-54
60-6470-74
0-410.-14
20-2430-34
40-4450-54
60-6470-74
Wilson & Daly, 1994
Functional Adaptation of TSD
• Can Changes in Cultural Practices Influence Temporal Horizon?p– Homo Sapiens emerged about
500,000 yrs ago.500,000 yrs ago.– Hunter-Gathering was the sole
economic enterprise for all but theeconomic enterprise for all but the last 2.6% of our time on this planet.13 000 i lt d l d– 13,000 yrs ago agriculture developed
Income & DiscountingIncome & Discounting
3.5
4
2
2.5
3
K months
0
0.5
1
1.5 K months
FarmersHunter-Gathers
Tucker, 2006
Income and Discounting
• Econometric studies of U.S. data conclude that discounting is negatively correlated with labor income and education attainment (Lawrence, 1991)
A Component of the Fundamental Cause of HealthFundamental Cause of Health
Disparities
Phelan & Link, 2005
Social Factors Promoting theSocial Factors Promoting the Short Temporal
C lt f I di t G tifi ti• Culture of Immediate Gratification• Erosion of Civic-Community Bondsy• Erosion of the Family
E i D t i ti d• Economic Deterioration and Disorder
Percentage OverweightPercentage Overweight
1416
101214
468 6-11 yrs
12-19 yrs
02
1963- 1971- 1976- 1988- 1999-1970 1974 1980 1994 2002
Ogden et al., JAMA 2000; Hedley et al., JAMA 2004
U S Household SavingsU.S. Household Savings
78
4567
1234
Saving Rate
-101
1960- 1980- 1990- 1995- 2000- 20051979 1989 1994 1999 2004
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Poor Planning
PlanningPunishedPre-existing
LessPlanningPlanning
IncreasesPunishedg
DamagePlanning
Drug SR+CorticalLimbic
Cortical Representation
Learned Disuse & Limbic p
Changes Use
Neurotox? Drug UseBehavior
Drug UseReinforced
Drug Use Increases
UnfavorableEnvironmentsEnvironments
Escaping the Tyranny ofEscaping the Tyranny of Small Decisions
Hyperactive Impulsive SystemLik lLikely
Contingency ManagementReplacement Medications
UnlikelyyCognitive Behavior TherapyOther MedicationsOther Medications
Escaping the Tyranny ofEscaping the Tyranny of Small Decisions
Hypoactive Executive SystemLikelyLikely
Other Medications?U lik lUnlikely
Contingency Management Cognitive Behavior Therapy Replacement Medications
PositiveExec Func.Increase SR+BehaviorMotivation
Exec. Func.
Use-dependentCorticalC ti l CorticalReorganization
CorticalLimbic
DecreaseDecreaseMotivationDrug Use
Drug Abstin.Reinforced
Drug Use Increases
Escaping the Tyranny ofEscaping the Tyranny of Small Decisions
Impulsive System Constraint
Executive FunctionImprovement
Conclusions
• Broaden our view of mechanismsBroaden our view of mechanisms to those relevant to multiple disordersdisorders
• Align our understanding of Disease/Disorder with TreatmentDisease/Disorder with Treatment and preventionTSD id h• TSD may provide one such mechanism
• Suggests new mechanisms of behavioral change to explore
“Time is both a medium and a perspective. It is a medium through which we live as the future becomes present. As the future becomes present, we become aware of duration and successionwe become aware of duration and succession. Also, by transcending the present and looking at it from the past or future we gain perspective on thefrom the past or future, we gain perspective on the present. These time processes are fundamental to our construction of reality. If they are disturbed, our view of reality may become distorted”.
-F.T. Melges (Time and the Inner Future, 1982)