2
ERRATUM Erratum to: Gendered support to older parents: do welfare states matter? Tina Schmid Martina Brandt Klaus Haberkern Published online: 3 May 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag 2012 Erratum to: Eur J Ageing DOI 10.1007/s10433-011-0197-1 In the published article, Fig. 5 was incorrect. The corrected figure appears in this erratum. The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10433-011-0197-1. T. Schmid (&) Á K. Haberkern Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] M. Brandt Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), 80799 Munich, Germany 123 Eur J Ageing (2012) 9:95–96 DOI 10.1007/s10433-012-0230-z

Erratum to: Gendered support to older parents: do welfare states matter?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ERRATUM

Erratum to: Gendered support to older parents: do welfarestates matter?

Tina Schmid • Martina Brandt • Klaus Haberkern

Published online: 3 May 2012

� Springer-Verlag 2012

Erratum to: Eur J Ageing

DOI 10.1007/s10433-011-0197-1

In the published article, Fig. 5 was incorrect. The corrected

figure appears in this erratum.

The online version of the original article can be found under

doi:10.1007/s10433-011-0197-1.

T. Schmid (&) � K. Haberkern

Institute of Sociology, University of Zurich, Andreasstrasse 15,

8050 Zurich, Switzerland

e-mail: [email protected]

M. Brandt

Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA),

80799 Munich, Germany

123

Eur J Ageing (2012) 9:95–96

DOI 10.1007/s10433-012-0230-z

Sporadic support

Intensive support

ES

GRPL IT

CZ

AU IE DE

FRCH

BE

NL

SESEDK

r=-0.110

20

40

60sp

orad

icgl

y su

ppor

ting

child

ren

% m

en

spor

adic

gly

supp

ortin

g ch

ildre

n%

men

spor

adic

gly

supp

ortin

g ch

ildre

n%

men

0 5 10 15 20

% employees in social services

Social services

IE

NL

DKCH

CZ

BESESE

ES

GRFR

PL

DEIT

AU

r=0.45+0

20

40

60

0 5 10 15

Public spending oncash benefits in % of GDP

Cash benefits

0

20

40

60

no/minor strong

no/minor strong

Difference=-4.0*

% employees in social services Public spending oncash benefits in % of GDP

Difference=7.6*

Legal obligations

GR

ES

PL

ITCZ

AU

IEDEFR

CH

BE NL

SESE

DK

r=0.58*0

20

40

60

inte

nsiv

ely

supp

ortin

g ch

ildre

n%

men

inte

nsiv

ely

supp

ortin

g ch

ildre

n%

men

inte

nsiv

ely

supp

ortin

g ch

ildre

n%

men

0% 5 10 15 20

Social services

IENL

DK

CHCZ

BE

SEES

GR

FR

PL

DEIT

AU

r=-0.49+0

20

40

60

0 5 10 15

Cash benefits

0

20

40

60

Legal obligations

Fig. 5 Gender compositions of children supporting a parent and

the welfare state. Source SHARE 2004, 2006, respondents 50?

who sporadically (n = 2,824) or intensively supported a parent

(n = 774) (n \ 30 in IE, CH, DK). OECD (2010), Mestheneos and

Triantafillou (2005). Significance levels ?p \ 0.1; *p \ 0.05;

**p \ 0.01; ***p \ 0.001. Own calculations, weighted. Coefficients

reported: Pearson correlation coefficients respectively t test (legal

obligations)

96 Eur J Ageing (2012) 9:95–96

123