View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 eRPMS
1/25
Division of City Sch
District of Katanga
JOSE R. LANSANG ELEMEN
General Santos Ci
INDIVIDUAL PER!R"ANCE C!""I#
a%e& of E%'loyee&
osition&
eview Perio(& Date
osition&
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
10%
Na%e
Positi
WEIGHT PERKRA
Learning-Teaching Process Prepared daily lesson plans and daily logs of activitiesincluding appropriate, adequate and updatedinstructional materials within the rating period
June-October201
8/18/2019 eRPMS
2/25
!"
!acilitated learning in the school through functionallessons plans, daily logs and innovative teachingstrategies
8/18/2019 eRPMS
3/25
10%
"nitiated discipline of pupils, monitored attendance,diversity appreciation, safe, positive and motivatingenvironment, overall physical atmosphere, cleanlinessand orderliness of classrooms including proper wastedisposal daily
#onitored, evaluated and maintained pupils$ students%progress and school records within the rating period
8/18/2019 eRPMS
4/25
Pupils Outcomes
10%
#!"
#!"
&onducted remediation$ enrichment programs toimprove performance indicators
'ttained the required ()' for grade level and learningareas
8/18/2019 eRPMS
5/25
Community Involvement
&onducted periodic P*' meetings$conferences
5%
$"
$"
25%
$.!"
.$"
Plus Factor25%
25%
+isited parents of pupils needing academicmonitoring$follow-up within the rating period
ndertaen$initiated pro.ects$events$activities withe/ternal funding$sponsorship within the target date
Pro!essional "rowth and#evelopment
&onducted problem$classroom-based 'ctionesearch
"nitiated$Participated in co-curricular$school activitieswithin the rating period
Produced publications$ creative wor for schoolpaper$division publication within the target date
eceived special awards$citation$recognition fore/emplary performance
Performed academic functions for schooldevelopment
Produced a learning material adhering learning-teaching process
8/18/2019 eRPMS
6/25
o get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
Ra%&r
8/18/2019 eRPMS
7/25
ols
an
ARY SCHOOL
y
"EN# AND REVIE$ !R"
Review&
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE IN'ICATORS ACT(AL RES(LTSAVE. SCORE )
*+,ali%- E/ci&nc- Ti0&lin&ss1 + E T
00 0000
of Rater& MARILO MARIE L. BOLOSO
n& Principal I
'll daily lesson plans had the following ob.ective, sub.ect matter,rocedures, evaluation and assignmentach part had a full description of what to do with an e/ampleOb.ective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-orientednd time-bound1003 and above developed high order thining sills'ttained 1003 and above of the desired learning competencies1003 and above based on the budget of wor
8/18/2019 eRPMS
8/25
00 0000
*he teacher established challenging and measureable goal$s forupil learning that is aligned with the 45epd standards or
Philippine lementary 6earning &ompetencies 4P6&7 8 to 12urriculum9*he goal reflected a range of pupils learner needs9:as provided individual activities for a 1003 and above of thelasses handled for the rating period*eaching methods and strategies elicited 1003 and above
nteraction from a class"nductive method$deductive method was 1003 and above used
n teaching a lesson&ooperative learning strategies was 1003 and above effective
when used
"&* integration is1003 and above evidentesults of student observation$ appraisal are 1003 and abovesed as basis for follow-up
8/18/2019 eRPMS
9/25
00 0000
)afety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and properwaste disposal were 1003 and above maintained
'ttendance checing was 1003 and above systematicallyarried outvidences showed that the teacher purposely plans assessmentsnd varies assessment choices to match the different students%eeds, abilities, and learning styles9&lass record reflected the bases of 1003 and above of pupils%atings in all classes$sub.ect areas handled)tudents% portfolio contained 1003 and above of hisccomplishment*able of )pecifications is 1003 and above prepared for tests thatequire it*able of )pecifications showed1003 and above congruenceetween content and sills tested*est questions were1003 and above logically sequencedPretest and Post-test were 1003 and above administered in alllasses$sub.ect area 4supported by analysis report on sub.ect areaer class$grade level7
Pupils were 1003 and above guided in the observation oflassroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating
n the report card$.ournal
vidences showed that the teacher purposely plans
ssessments and varies assessment choices to match theifferent students% needs, abilities, and learning styles9
&lass record reflected the bases of 1003 and above of pupils%
atings in all classes$sub.ect areas handled
)tudents% portfolio contained 1003 and above of his
ccomplishment
8/18/2019 eRPMS
10/25
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
*able of )pecifications is 1003 and above prepared for tests
hat require it
*able of )pecifications showed1003 and above congruence
etween content and sills tested
*est questions were1003 and above logically sequenced
Pretest and Post-test were 1003 and above administered in all
lasses$sub.ect area 4supported by analysis report on sub.ect areaer class$grade level7
emediation$ nrichment Program is offered to 1003 and above
f pupils who need it
1003 and above #P)$()'
8/18/2019 eRPMS
11/25
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
5 5 5 50 0250
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
1003 and above accomplishment with set agreements met
1003 and above accomplishment of set visits successful
nterventions
1003 and above pro.ect accomplishment with full
ocumentation report on completion
; 'ction esearch conducted with full documentation on
ompletion of interventions
"nitiated at least 2 co-curricular$ school activities with
ocumented results
Produced publication$ creative wor published in
8/18/2019 eRPMS
12/25
8/18/2019 eRPMS
13/25
INDIVIDUAL PER!R"ANCE C!""I#a%e& of E%'loyee& Na%e
osition& Positi
eview Perio(& Date
*rea*+Center+Service+Division&
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
$& Plan
Division of City SchIRINEO L. SANTIAGO NATIONA
OF METRO 'A'IANI,!G E-#./ GENERAL SAN#
WEIGHT PERKRA
Planned and organi=ed )># by 'pril of every schoolyear
'ssisted in the formulation and implementation of the)># within target date
8/18/2019 eRPMS
14/25
School CurriculumMonitoring and Evaluation
Plan
#onitored teachers
valuated the teaching-learning process based onresults
$chool 'esource&anagement
#onitored the ma/imum use of resource materials
&oordinated with staeholders in the acquisition oflearning materials, resources and equipment withintarget date
ffected .udiciously the use of school facilities andsupply materials within the rating period
(uman 'esource&anagement
&onducted )chool->ased "
8/18/2019 eRPMS
15/25
Special Assignment
Plus Factor
25%
o get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
Ra%&r
stablished support and cooperation of allstaeholders
"dentified qualified teachers for promotion at the endof school year
8/18/2019 eRPMS
16/25
"EN# AND REVIE$ !R"
of Rater&
n&
Review&
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE IN'ICATORS ACT(AL RES(LTSAVE. SCORE )
*+,ali%- E/ci&nc- Ti0&lin&ss1 + E T
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
olsHIGH SCHOOL
GASS CI#,
'ssisted in )># implementation by preparing the )># Plan,oordinating with staeholders in the acquisition of resource
materials and equipment, monitoring the use of resource materials,onducting school-based "
8/18/2019 eRPMS
17/25
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
#onitored teachers% instruction, conducted post-conference witheachers, made follow-up observations and adopted a supervisorytyle that fits the teacher being monitored
1003 and above evaluation of the teaching- learning processhrough results
1003 )"P and '"P submitted and 1003 and above weremplemented within target date
&oordination resulted to 1003 and above resource generation forhe school 4with report7
1003 and above of teachers performance increased at the endf every semester
1003 and above of teachers performance increased at the endf every semester
8/18/2019 eRPMS
18/25
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
Poor 0000
Ra%&& Appr23in4 A,%52ri%-
8/18/2019 eRPMS
19/25
INDIVIDUAL PER!R"ANCE C!""I#
a%e& of E%'loyee& Na%e
osition& Positi
eview Perio(& Date
*rea*+Center+Service+Division&
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Division of City SchIRINEO L. SANTIAGO NATIONA
OF METRO 'A'IANI,!G E-#./ GENERAL SAN#
WEIGHT PERKRA
Pro!essional "rowth and
#evelopment
&onducted at least an action research related toschool or classroom concerns$ problems during theyear
&onducted$Participated in seminars, worshops,trainings within a year 4division, regional or national7
eceived 4division, regional or national7 awards$recognitions within a year
)erved as demonstration teacher
8/18/2019 eRPMS
20/25
Instructional Competence
Instructional $upervision
:andled teaching loads every year
'chieved above?3 of the students% performance atthe end of the school year
'ttained 1003 of the required learning competenciesfor the students in every quarter
"ncreased
8/18/2019 eRPMS
21/25
Plus Factor
o get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
Ra%&r
8/18/2019 eRPMS
22/25
"EN# AND REVIE$ !R"
of Rater&
n&
f Review&
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE IN'ICATORS ACT(AL RES(LTSAVE. SCORE )
*+,ali%- E/ci&nc- Ti0&lin&ss1 + E T
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
@ lesson demonstrations served00 0000
olsHIGH SCHOOL
GASS CI#,
'ction research conducted and utili=ed division wide supportedy the following evidencesA-esearch proposal 4in complete format7-esearch eport 4in complete format highlighting
ndings and recommendations7-Proposed learning interventions and programs-Proposed #B for results$outcomes
&onducted seminars$worshops$trainings for teachers inpecific learning areas 4supported by evidence$assessmenteports7
8/18/2019 eRPMS
23/25
00 0000
1003 and above student performance 4in #P) or ()'7
00 0000
00 0000
103 increase00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
00 0000
1003 and above required teaching load handled for year
1003 and above of the required competencies in every quarterompleted
1003 and above of teachers observed with post conferencewith teacher observation reports held in every quarter
and above teacher mentoring $coaching sessions wereonducted in every quarter 4 with report7
valuated 1003 and above teacher performance followingP#) framewor cycle
8/18/2019 eRPMS
24/25
00 0000
00 0000
Poor 0000
Ra%&& Appr23in4 A,%52ri%-
8/18/2019 eRPMS
25/25
0 Poor
19 nsatisfactory
29 )atisfactory
;9 +ery )atisfactory@9 Outstanding