Upload
helena-booth
View
225
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tailoring Strong Lensing
Cosmographic Observations
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: 1502.01353v1)
Contents
I. Introduction
II. Measuring time delay distances
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup
IV. Influence of systematicsA. Redshift distribution revisited
B. Model systematics
V. Conclusion
I. Introduction
What is the ‘Cosmography’?The science that maps the general features
of the cosmos or universe, describing both heaven and Earth
beginning to be used to describe attempts to determine the large-scale geometry and kinematics of the observable universe, independent of any specific cosmological theory or model
1. Introduction – Cosmography
Distance – redshift relations Type Ia supernova luminosity distance -
redshift relation The cosmic microwave background radiation
anisotropies/ baryon acoustic oscillations in galaxy clustering
Cosmic redshift drift The strong gravitational lensing time delay
distance - redshift relation (1964, Refsdal)
1. Introduction
Strong lensing distance Why interesting?
unlike the standard distance-redshift relations the measured time delay is a dimensionful quantity
the time delay distance is comprised of the ratio of three distances○ sensitive to the Hubble constant H0○ the time delay distance has an unusual dependence on
dark energy properties and has high complementarity with the usual distance probes
On-going & future surveys:DES, LSST, Euclid, WFIRST
1. Introduction
Two aspects of implementation of time delay distances into surveys1. Optimization of spectroscopic resources
2. The role of systematics
II. Measuring time delay distances Time delay between two images of the
source come from:The geometric path difference of the light
propagationThe differing gravitational potential
experienced The time delay distance:
Δt : the observed time delayΔϕ: the potential difference modeled from
the observations such as image position, fluxes, surface brightness
II. Measuring time delay distances The time delay distance:
(surveys: DES, LSST, Euclid, WFIRST)Δt : the observed time delay
○ By monitoring the image fluxes over several yearsΔϕ: the potential difference modeled from the
observations such as image position, fluxes, surface brightness○ constrained by the rich data of the images (HST,
JWST)○ lens mass modeling : galaxy velocity dispersion
by through spectroscopy○ Redshift of lens and sources : spectroscopy
II. Measuring time delay distances For Δt and Δϕ,
These essential followup must be sought in order to derive the strong lensing cosmological constraints from the wide field imaging survey (limitation on telescope time)
The optimization of cosmological leverage given a finite followup resources
Combine the strong lesing distances with CMB and supernovae distances to break degeneracies between parameters
II. Measuring time delay distances Etc.
Combine the strong lesing distances with CMB and supernovae distances to break degeneracies between parameters
Adopt a Planck quality constraint on the distance to last scattering (0.2%) and physical matter density (0.9%)
For supernovae, use a sample of the quality expected from ground based surveys
Perform a Fisher information analysis for (Ωm, w0, wa, h, Μ) with flat LCMD cosmology
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup Spectroscopic time is restricted
Optimization: maximize the cosmological leverage of the measured time delay distance given the constraint, fixed this (= limited source)
by examining the impact of sculpting the redshift distribution of the lenses to be followed up
especially, fix the spectroscopic time for the sample of lenses whose redshift or galaxy velocity dispersion are to be measured with fixed signal-to-noise
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup Spectroscopic time for lenses is restricted
fixed signal-to-noise
gives Spectroscopic exposure time becomes increasingly
expensive with redshift as roughly (1+z)^6However, as exposure time gets smaller, other
noise contributions enter as well as overheads (telescope slewing and detector readout time)
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup Spectroscopic time for lenses is restricted
Optimizing procesureFix signal-to-noise to obtain constraint on the
exposure time, t_exp
Choose the quantity to optimize: dark energy figure of merit (FOM), the area of a confidence contour in the dark energy equation of state plane, marginalized over all other parameters.
To optimize the redshift distribution, begin with a uniform distribution in lens redshift
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup Spectroscopic time for lenses is restricted
Optimizing procesureFix signal-to-noise to obtain constraint on the
exposure time, t_expChoose the quantity to optimize: dark energy figure
of merit (FOM)To optimize the redshift distribution, begin with a
uniform distribution in lens redshift• Take 25 time delay systems of 5% precision in each bin of
redshift width dz = 0.1 over the range z = 0.1~0.7, for a total of 150 systems (fixed resource constraint, total spectroscopic time)
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup Spectroscopic time for lenses is restricted
Optimizing procesureFixe signal-to-noise to obtain constraint on the
exposure time, t_expChoose the quantity to optimize: dark energy figure
of merit (FOM)Begin with a uniform distribution in lens redshiftPerturb the initial uniform distribution by one system
in each bin, one at a time (conserve the resources)Calculate resulting FOMIterate the last two processesRound the numbers in each bin to the nearest
integer
III. Optimizing Spectroscopic Followup
Optimization increases the FOM by almost 40%, keeping the spectroscopic time fixed.
Optimized redshift dist. Heavily weighted toward low
redshift (less time burden) The higher redshift bin is needed,
but it does not seek to maximize the range by taking the highest bin (greatest time burden)
FOM becomes improved Parameter estimation
IV. Influence of Systematics Dealing with systematic uncertainties Investigate two impact of systematics
A. Redshift distribution revisited
B. Model systematics
IV. Influence of Systematics
A. Redshift distribution revisited The effect of various levels of systematic
uncertainties on the optimization in III.On the optimized redshift distribution and
the resulting cosmological parameter estimation.
Implementation of the systematic as a floor, added in quadrature to the statistical uncertainty:ni: the number in redshift bin i
IV. Influence of Systematics
A. Redshift distribution revisited
Optimized lens redshift distribution, subject to resource constraint, for different levels of systematics
IV. Influence of Systematics
A. Redshift distribution revisited
Optimized lens redshift distribution, subject to resource constraint, for different levels of systematics
IV. Influence of Systematics
A. Redshift distribution revisited
Optimized lens redshift distribution, subject to resource constraint, for different levels of systematics
reduced hubble constant, h
V. Conclusion
The strong gravitational lensing time delay distance – redshift relation : a geometric probe of cosmologyBeing dimensionful and hence sensitive to
the Hubble constant, H0Being a triple distance ratio and hence
highly complementary to other distance probes
V. Conclusion
The strong gravitational lensing time delay distance – redshift relation : a geometric probe of cosmology
Optimization of the lens system redshift distribution to give maximal cosmology leverage, given followup resources do improve the result (FOM, parameter estimation, etc)