2
St at e of Wis cons in Ci rc ui t Court Chip pewa County Branch 1 Jeffrey P. Erbs Petitioner vs. CASE NO. 10 F A 11 Mary Ann Erbs Respondent Motion to Show Cause Re: Vexat ious Litigation Comes now, Jeffrey P . Erbs upon motion to Show Cause re: Vexatious Litigation, whereby Pamela V eith has asked a vexed question, Constituting V exatious Litigation V exed Question (Black's Law Dictionary 7 th . Ed.) - 1. A quest ion often argued about but seemingly never settled. 2. A question or point that has been decided differently by diff erent tribunals and has therefore been left in doubt. On April 22, 2010 Pamela Veith, under the action of Fraud upon This Court, Constituting Criminal Contempt and Vexatious Litigation, asks a question without jurisdiction within Parens Patraie ability , whereby leading the appearance to this Court of limited Jurisdiction that t here is question of Jeffrey P . Erbs Condition, AFTER petition for dissolution of a marriage, whereby Compelling, via Criminal Coercion Jeffrey P . Erbs to prove that he is to BE disabled, rather than he already was during the marriage of substance matter , but-for cause. (Black's Law Dictionary 7 th . Ed.) The cause without which the event could not have occurred. (Page 2, Line 19 of Transcript of Proceedings)  ____________________,

ERBS Motion to Show Cause Re Vexatious Litigation VEITH

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ERBS Motion to Show Cause Re Vexatious Litigation VEITH

8/3/2019 ERBS Motion to Show Cause Re Vexatious Litigation VEITH

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/erbs-motion-to-show-cause-re-vexatious-litigation-veith 1/1

State of Wisconsin Circuit Court Chippewa County

Branch 1

Jeffrey P. ErbsPetitioner 

vs.

CASE NO. 10 FA 11

Mary Ann Erbs

Respondent

Motion to Show Cause Re: Vexatious Litigation

Comes now, Jeffrey P. Erbs upon motion to Show Cause re: Vexatious Litigation, whereby Pamela

Veith has asked a vexed question, Constituting Vexatious Litigation

Vexed Question (Black's Law Dictionary 7th

. Ed.) - 1. A question often argued about but seeminglynever settled. 2. A question or point that has been decided differently by different tribunals and has

therefore been left in doubt.

On April 22, 2010 Pamela Veith, under the action of Fraud upon This Court, Constituting Criminal

Contempt and Vexatious Litigation, asks a question without jurisdiction within Parens Patraie ability,whereby leading the appearance to this Court of limited Jurisdiction that there is question of Jeffrey P.

Erbs Condition, AFTER petition for dissolution of a marriage, whereby Compelling, via Criminal

Coercion Jeffrey P. Erbs to prove that he is to BE disabled, rather than he already was during themarriage of substance matter, but-for cause. (Black's Law Dictionary 7th. Ed.) The cause without which

the event could not have occurred. (Page 2, Line 19 of Transcript of Proceedings)

 ____________________,