Upload
aira
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program. Overview. Overview of Evaluation Program Research update. Purpose of EPIC Evaluation Program. To investigate how online electronic resources affect different aspects of the scholarly communication process. a) general perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs
Evaluation Program
Overview
• Overview of Evaluation Program
• Research update
Purpose of EPIC Evaluation Program
• To investigate how online electronic resources affect different aspects of the scholarly communication process.
a) general perspective
b) through lens of EPIC projects
How Does the Shift to Electronic Resources Affect the Following Groups?
• Publishers
• Administrators/Information Technology
• Librarians
• Faculty
• Students
Research Approach
• Interviews
• Focus Groups
• Surveys
• Weblog analysis
Info gathering Survey development
Research Projects to Date• Librarian Focus Group
• Librarian Online Survey
• Faculty Interviews
• Faculty Online Survey
• Student Interviews
• Student Online Survey• http://epic.columbia.edu/eval/
Librarian Online Survey
Methodology• a 15 minute online survey of librarians was conducted in Winter, 2002
• e-mail invitations were sent to librarians at higher education institutions across the country
• All were librarians at institutions that are either CIAO or Earthscape subscribers, or have been identified as being potential subscribers
• 1007 respondents (response rate: 32%)
Objectives
• Learn what librarians perceive as the benefits and disadvantages of electronic resources.
• Gain insights into how electronic resources affect the role of the librarian.
• Gain insights into how electronic resources affect the role of print resources.
Conclusions from Librarian Survey
Electronic Resources:
• Allow libraries to serve patrons more effectively
• Put a strain on some libraries
• Do not replace print resources
Faculty Survey
Methods• a 25 minute online survey of faculty and graduate students was conducted in Winter 2003
• e-mail invitations were sent to scholars at higher education institutions across the country
• scholars were involved in the disciplines of International Affairs or Earth Sciences
• 845 respondents (response rate 14%)
Objectives
• Gain insights into how academics are using electronic resources in their academic work
• Gain insights into the perceived benefits and disadvantages of electronic resources
• Learn how academics perceive electronic resources as affecting undergraduate students’ scholarship
• Examine differences based on stage of career, type of discipline, and type of institution
Respondent Profile
Gender & AgeN=845
9.5%
21.3%
25.9%
28.0%
13.5%
27.9%
72.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
61+
51-60
41-50
31-40
21-30
Female
MaleGender
Age
Position & Type of InstitutionN=845
11.8%
20.4%
67.7%
19.8%
5.9%
3.8%
18.8%
21.2%
30.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Baccalaureate College
Master's College
Research University
Graduate Student/Post-doctoralFellow
AdjunctProfessor/Instructor/Lecturer/Other
Research position in an academicinstitution
Assistant Professor
Associate Professor
Full Professor
Level ofAppointment
Type ofInstitution
Academic Responsibilities and Field of Study N=845
2.2%
32.5%
40.7%
19.3%
5.2%
36.4%
63.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Solely as a teacher
More as a teacher than as aresearcher
About equally as a researcherand as a teacher
More as a researcher than asa teacher
Solely as a researcher
International Affairs
Earth/Environmental ScienceField of Study
Academic Responsibiliti
Electronic Resources and Academics’ Work Habits
Use of and Proficiency with Electronic ResourcesN=845
2.2%
29.3%
48.3%
20.1%
0.2%
0.6%
7.6%
29.3%
62.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not at all proficient (1)
Not very proficient
Somewhat proficient
Very Proficient
Extremely proficient (5)
Never
Less than once a month
Once a month
A few times a month
A few times a week
Every day
Proficiency with electronic resources
Mean3.86
Use of electronic resources
Electronic Resources’ Affect on Work HabitsN=845
9.7%
46.0%
47.8%
18.7%
31.2%
34.0%
38.7%
14.9%
16.7%
8.4%
8.6%
27.9%
20.9%
6.6%
34.1%
20.7%
3.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I have a tendency to go nofurther than electronicresources in search for
information
I sometimes find that I settlefor materials that are
available online rather thanmake a trip to the library toget what I really would like
I use the physical libraryless than I would if
electronic resources werenot available to me
I am increasinglydependent on electronic
resources
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply
MEAN
4.27
4.13
2.88
2.30
Work Habits and The LibraryN=845
17.5%
22.8%
59.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I do most of my library work inside the physicallibrary
I do most of my library work outside the physicallibrary because I can adjust my information needs tosuit my preference for working from my home/office
I do most of my work outside the physical librarybecause I can readily access the information I need
remotely
Perceived Benefits and Disadvantages
of UsingElectronic Resources
Benefits of Electronic Resources--ConvenienceN=845
44.7%
51.5%
57.2%
36.9%
26.3%
30.4%
9.0%
9.7%
7.1%
7.8%0.1
%
3.9%
5.3%
1.3%
3.9%
1.4%
3.3%
0.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
More information withless effort
Possible for me towork from home orother location offcampus/work site
Save time
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply
MEAN
4.38
4.20
4.16
Slide 1 of 2
Benefits of Electronic Resources—Improved Availability N=845
10.2%
29.6%
33.0%
33.6%
41.2%
21.7%
44.3%
41.5%
34.0%
43.1%
19.9%
17.8%
14.8%
18.1%
10.3%
31.6%
4.1%
6.0%
15.1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Greater access to olderscholarly information
Items become availablequicker electronically than
in print
Some materials are morereadily available
electronically than in print
Increased access topictures/graphics
Greater access to currentscholarly information
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply MEAN 4.21
3.97
4.03
4.01
2.80
Slide 2 of 2
Disadvantages of Electronic ResourcesN=845
11.5%
14.8%
18.7%
29.5%
37.3%
37.4%
41.8%
22.0%
17.9%
20.1%
20.7%
20.9%
19.6%
18.5%
13.7%
16.3%
12.8%
9.0%
4.4%
10.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
The amount of informationavailable can be
overwhelming for me
I have difficulty judging thequality of content
Too much information isavailable
Increases the need toseparate out the "reliable"
information from the"unreliable" information.
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply
MEAN
3.57
3.31
3.15
2.98
Benefits and Disadvantages by DisciplineN=845
3.22
3.95
4.10
4.32
3.46
4.18
3.70
4.49
3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5
Too much information is available
Some materials are more readily availableelectronically than in print
Increased access to pictures/graphics
Save time
International Affairs
Earth/Environmental Science
All of the differences in means by discipline on this chart are statistically significant.
Benefits and Disadvantages by SeniorityN=845
3.00
3.43
3.94
4.32
4.50
3.24
3.65
4.10
4.03
4.29
2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
I have difficulty judging the quality of content
Increases the need to separate out the "reliable"information from the "unreliable" information.
Some materials are more readily availableelectronically
More information with less effort
Save time
Associate/FullProfessor
GraduateStudent/PostDoctoralFellow/AssistantProfessor
All of the differences in means by seniority on this chart are statistically significant.
Teaching with Electronic Resources
Use of Electronic Resources for TeachingN=419
8.6%
27.4%
35.3%
57.0%
65.2%
67.3%
72.1%
79.0%
85.7%
90.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I teach extension courses online
I use online materials in place of textbooks
I use online classroom programs (e.g. Blackboard)
I created a course website for one or more of my courses
I place course materials online (e.g. reserve readings)
I go online to research lectures that I will be covering in class
I go online to get images that help demonstrate ideas
I go online to get current events information to help demonstrateideas
I retrieve data online for classroom use
I direct students to primary or supplementary materials found online
Use of Electronic Resources for Teaching by DisciplineN=419
30.9%
82.4%
72.9%
85.9%
42.7%
54.8%
89.2%
96.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I use online classroomprograms
I go online to get imagesthat help demonstrate
ideas
I go online to get currentevents information to help
demonstrate ideas
I direct students to primaryor supplementary
materials found online
International Affairs
Earth/EnvironmentalScience
All of the differences in means by discipline on this chart are statistically significant.
Electronic Resources & Students—BenefitsN=419
10.3%
43.4%
62.3%
26.5%
39.6%
32.5%
23.4%
9.8%
27.0%
4.5%
9.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Students have increasedaccess to older
information because ofelectronic resources
Students are now able todo projects they wouldn'thave been able to in the
past because some typesof information are morereadily available online
Students have increasedaccess to current
information because ofelectronic resources
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply
MEAN
4.57
4.24
3.01
Slide 1 of 2
Electronic Resources & Students—ProblemsN=419
28.2%
50.8%
51.3%
58.0%
64.0%
37.7%
33.4%
33.4%
33.2%
28.6%
16.9%
8.4%
4.8%0.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Students spend less time thinking or deliberating overmaterial because the whole research process is sped up
by electronic resources
Students' use of electronic resources has resulted in themoften not learning how to use the physical library
Electronic resources facilitate plagiarism among students
Students have a tendency to go no further than electronicresources in searching for information
Students have difficulty evaluating the quality of contentof some online information
Strongly agree (5) Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree (1) Does not apply
MEAN
4.59
4.47
4.38
4.32
3.82
Slide 2 of 2
Class Time Spent Instructing Students How to Evaluate Online Information
N=419
64.5%
77.7%
74.0%
69.5%
73.7%
64.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Earth/EnvironmentalScience
International Affairs
Research Universities
Master'sColleges/Universities
Baccalaureate Colleges
Overall
Availability of Courses Instructing Students How to Evaluate Electronic Resources
N=419
32.5%
6.7%
50.8%
6.4%
3.6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I don't know/Not sure
Other
There is no formal mechanism set up to trainstudents how to evaluate online information
My institution has an optional course
My institution has a required course
The Effect of Electronic Resources on Overall Quality of Students’ Learning Experience
N=419
1.0%
5.3%
9.5%
61.3%
22.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very negatively (1)
Somewhat negatively
Neither positively nornegatively
Somewhat positively
Very positively (5)
MEAN4.00
Satisfaction with Electronic Resources
Importance of and Satisfaction with ER
2.63
3.14
3.17
2.87
2.89
3.02
2.85
3.50
3.66
3.67
3.65
3.66
3.70
3.75
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Availability of older/archived information
Currency of information
Ability to print materials
Ease of navigation
Search capabilities of database
Ability to download materials
Full text available
Importance
Satisfaction
Importance of and Satisfaction with ER
2.88
2.86
3.03
2.66
3.19
3.06
2.91
3.01
3.07
3.27
3.30
3.42
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
No required login
Availability of high qualityimages/graphics
Text is in preservedformat
The ability to tell if aresource on the site is
peer reviewed
Reputation of provider
Speed of site
ImportanceSatisfaction
Important and Satisfied
• Ability to download• Ability to print• Currency of info• Speed of sites• Reputation of
providers• Text in PDF or other
standard format
• Full text available• Search capabilities• Ease of Navigation• Availability of
older/archived information
• Ability to tell if peer reviewed
Important and Not Satisfied
Other suggestions• Reduce price
• Standardize navigation and search procedures across databases
• Synthesize databases so that they are accessible through a single portal
• Faster turn-around time/More frequent updates
• Clearly identify or label sources
Conclusions• Electronic resources have become the main tool for scholars’ information gathering.
• Electronic resources are seen as providing convenience more so than increased availability of information.
• The main problem with electronic resources is having to separate out reliable from unreliable information.
• Most faculty believe students have an enhanced learning experience because of the information available through electronic resources.
• Future efforts could focus on providing increased access to older and full text material, and improving search and navigation capabilities.
Christina Norman, Ph.D.Research Director, EPICColumbia University211 International Affairs Building420 West 118th Street, Mail Code 3301New York, NY 10027 [email protected]
EPIC evaluation web site:
http://epic.columbia.edu/eval/