Upload
vuongkhue
View
225
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Environmental Monitoring Report
Quarterly Report (June-August 2015) November 2015
VIE: GMS Ben Luc-Long Thanh Expressway Project
Prepared by Dasan Consultants Co., Ltd. in joint venture with Kunhwa Engineering & Consulting Co., Ltd and International Consultants and Technocrats Pvt, Ltd for the Vietnam Expressway Corporation, the Ministry of Transport of Vietnam, and the Asian Development Bank.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 15 November 2015)
Currency unit –D1.00 = $1.00 =
dong (D)$0.0000446D22,418
NOTE
In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.
This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Page 1
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT
Vietnam Expressway Corporation (VEC)
Quarterly Progress Report (Environment)
(June - August 2015)
Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) Ben Luc-Long Thanh (BLLT) Expressway Project
Construction Supervision Consulting Services
Loan No: 2730-VIE (ADB) & Loan No: VN11-P3 (JICA)
DASAN CONSULTANTS CO. LTD.,
in joint venture with
KUNHWA ENGINEERING & CONSULTING CO., LTD., and
INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS AND TECHONOCRATS PVT, LTD
Page 2
ACRONYMS
ADB Asian Development Bank
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
CEMP Construction Environment Management Plan
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
dBA Decibels
CO Carbon Monoxide
Sox Sulphur Oxides
Nox Nitrogen Oxides
BOD Biological Oxygen Demand
DO dissolved Oxygen
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
TSS Total Suspended Solids
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
EC Electrical Conductivity
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
APs Affected Persons
BLLT Ben Luc-Long Thanh Expressway
CSC Construction Supervision Consultant
DPR Detailed project report
EA Executing agency
EPMU Expressway Project Monitoring Unit
GoV Government of Vietnam
GRC Grievance Redress Committee
HCMC Ho Chi Minh City
IA Implementing Agency
MOT Ministry of Transport
TOR Terms of Reference
VEC Vietnam Expressway Corporation
Page 3
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4
2. COMPLIANCE WITH ADB LOAN COVENANTS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT LAWS,
REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................. 9
2.1 Status of compliance with ADB loan covenants ................................................................................ 9
2.2 Status of compliance with government environmental requirements ................................................ 9
3. CHANGES IN PROJECT SCOPE ................................................................................................... 10
4. INCORPORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS INTO PROJECT
CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 11
5. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIONS AND COMPENSATION MEASURES
IMPLEMENTED ....................................................................................................................................... 11
6. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ....................................................................... 13
6.1 Package A1 ..................................................................................................................................... 13
6.1.1 Monitoring location at package A1 .......................................................................................... 13
6.1.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A1 ................... 14
6.2 Package A2-1 .................................................................................................................................. 21
6.2.1 Monitoring location at package A2-1 ....................................................................................... 21
6.2.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A2-1 ................ 22
6.3 Package A3 ..................................................................................................................................... 28
6.3.1 Monitoring location at package A3 .......................................................................................... 28
6.3.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A3 ................... 29
6.4 Package J2 ...................................................................................................................................... 33
6.4.1 Monitoring location at Package J2 .......................................................................................... 33
6.4.2 Results of environmental monitoring at Package J2 ............................................................... 35
7. KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ................................................................................................... 59
8. COMPLAINTS ................................................................................................................................. 60
9. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................... 61
APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................... 62
Page 4
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Project description
Ben Luc - Long Thanh Expressway Project has an overall length of 58km. It traverses through 16 communes in 7 districts of 3 provinces. The start of the project is from My Yen commune and part of an access-road in Tan Buu commune, Ben Luc district, Long An province; then it goes through Binh Chanh commune, Tan Quy Tay commune, Hung Long commune, Da Phuoc commune in Binh Chanh district; Nhon Duc commune, Long Thoi Commune in Nha Be district, and Binh Khanh commune in Can Gio district, in Ho Chi Minh City; then goes through Vinh Thanh commune, Phuoc An commune in Nhon Trach district, Long Phuoc commune, Phuoc Thai commune in Long Thanh district of Dong Nai province. The land acquisition area along the route varies from 56m - 73m wide.
The package wise details of the concerned project are presented in Table-1 and Table-2.
Table 1: The Package details and Total Length of BLLT
Sl. No. Pkg. No. Location Length (in Km.)
Province District
Covered Commune
1 Package A-1
Km. 0+600 – 7+900
7.300 Km Long An Ben Luc My Yen
Can Giuoc Phuoc Ly
Ho Chi Minh
City Binh Chanh Binh Chanh
Tan Quy Tay
2 Package A 2-1
Km. 7+900 – 11+200
3.300 Km Ho Chi Minh
City Binh Chanh Tan Quy Tay
Long An Can Giuoc Long Thuong
Ho Chi Minh
city Binh Chanh Hung Long
3 Package A 2-2
Km. 11+200 - 16+600
5.400 Km Ho Chi Minh
city Binh Chanh Hung Long
Da Phuoc
Page 5
Sl. No. Pkg. No. Location Length (in Km.)
Province District
Covered Commune
4 Package A-3
Km.: 16+600 – 18+7135
2.114 Km Ho Chi Minh
city Binh Chanh Da Phuoc
Nha Be Nhon Duc
5 Package A- 4
The details of Package A-4 will be given once work is start.
Total 18.114
Table 2: The summary of the Civil Contract Packages of project
Description Packages
Project Name
A.1. A.2-1 A.2.2 A.3.
Project Location
Km0+600 – 7+900 Km7+900 –
11+200 Km11+200.0-
16+600.0 Km16+600 – 18+7135
Contract Number
03/HDXD-VEC/2015 04/HDXD-VEC/2015
067/HDXD-VEC/2014
67/HDXD-VEC/2015
Contract Length
7.300 Km 3.300 Km 5.400 Km 2.100 Km
Contractor JV Halla Corp–
Vinaconex Eng.Cons.&Invest.JSC.
JV Kukdong Eng.Consrt. Co.-Trung Chinh T.C.
Joint Venture of Samwhan Corporation - Vạn Cuong
JV Halla Corp–Vinaconex
Eng.Cons.&Invest.JSC.
NTP May 26th, 2015
May 19th,
2015 Aug. 15th
2015 May 19
th, 2015
Contract Period
1080 days 1,076 days 1050 days 1,095 days
1.2. Report Purpose
The main purpose of the Quarterly Progress Report (Environment) is summarize compliance with the environmental management activities of the packages by in ADB in the Third quarter of 2015.
The main objectives of this report are follows:
Grasp the general environmental condition;
Identify the environmental impacts in the Third quarter of 2015;
Summarize the result of environmental inspection during the Third quarter of 2015;
Summarize the result of environmental monitoring during the Third quarter of 2015;
Implementation of environmental protection.
1.3. Project Implementation Progress
The construction progress in the Third quarter of 2015 is described as follows:
Page 6
Table 3: Construction progress in the 3th
quarter of 2015
The package
Construction progress
June July August
A1 Construction of the site office, site
accommodation & labor camp.
Clearing and grubbing and excavation of
unsuitable material
- FR 3, FR 5, Access road of section 5 &
section 6
- Main line Km. 5+500 – Km. 7+650, Km.
0+650 – Km. 1+450
Embankment
- Access road 5 and access road 6, FR 3,
FR 5.
Bored Pile
- Preparation of material and mix design
(Tremie mix)
Construction of Precast Girder Yard at
Phuoc Ly Bridge (preparation status)
Construction of site office, site
accommodation and labor camps
Clearing, grubbing & excavation of
unsuitable material
- FR 1, FR 2, FR 3, FR 5, access road 5 &
access road 6
- Main line Km. 4+800 – Km.. 7_900, Km.
1+450 – Km. 2+200
Embankment
- FR 1, FR 2, FR 3, FR 5, access road 5 &
access road 6
Bored Pile
- preliminary test pile
Construction of precast girder yard
- Substructure works
Geological investigation boring
Laboratory mobilization
Batching Plant installation
Installation of project information sign
Construction of site office, site
accommodation and labor camps. It will be
finished on September 10th, 2015
Site clearing & grubbing of main road and
frontage road 187,000sqm completed (of
474,000sqm).
Excavation of unsuitable material for
access road, frontage road and main road
20,000cum (of 575,000cum)
Embankment of access road & frontage
road 2.40km 5,000cum (of 724,000cum)
Shop drawing of temporary & access road
are completed
Installation & calibration of Batching Plant
at Ben Luc bridge and Phuoc Ly bridge.
Construction of precast girder casting yard
at Phuoc Ly (50% completed)
Mobilization of site laboratory and
temporary site office
Geological investigation boring.
Preliminary test pile, including ultra sonic
test and static load test
A2-1 None construction Surveying topography
Calibration Batching Plant
Take sample & input material for concrete
work: Stone, sand, admixture, cement,
Batching Plant preparation need
calibration, environmental management,
permission from local authority and should
match with ADB requirement.
Page 7
The package
Construction progress
June July August
water, ultrasonic pipe
Trial mix of concrete mix C35 using for
preliminary test pile at lab.
Trial mix of concrete mix C35 using for
preliminary test pile at batching plant
Testing of concrete compressive strength
at 7 days of C35 using for preliminary test
pile (trial mix at Lab & batching plant)
Construction service road
Mobilizing equipment, material for
preliminary test pile
Site clearing at road section from Km.
10+900 – Km. 11+200
Ultra sonic test for preliminary test pile
has been done completely.
Mobilize concrete block and equipment for
static load test.
Canal relocation 450 m (of 1,000 m)
Site clearing and grubbing 1,200 m (of
3,300 m)
Environmental monitoring for base line
data
Temporary road preparation 150 m (of
4,700 m)
A2-2 None construction None construction Notice to proceed was issued on August
15th, 2015.
Site office has already prepared
completely.
Contractor has started site clearing at km.
15+600 to km. 16+600.
Low voltage station has been prepared.
Preparation of preliminary test pile on Ong
Thin bridge (Pier P3).
Site Laboratory (LAS-XD 1071) in
progress on km. 12+220.
A3 Construction of site office
Casting concrete blocks for static load test
of pile by kentledge method (quantity 2 of
400)
Construction of access road
Construction of Site Office
Construction of worker camps
Construction of casting yard & super T
Access road 1,700 m finished (of 1,900 m)
Construction of Site Office and workers
camp are finished
Construction of casting yard/bed of super
Page 8
The package
Construction progress
June July August
Preparing sand pumping for access road
Preparing of concrete Batching Plant
Preparing of casting yard, 7000 m2, for
super T girder.
girder
Construction of transformer station
320KVA, 560 KVA
Mobilization equipments & machines to
drill soil investigation
Commencement of topographic survey of
natural ground
Commencement of geological survey
Mobilization of Man powers, Machines,
equipments material for test pile
Casting of concrete block for static loading
test (60/400)
T girder are finished for 3 girders
Construction of Batching Plant of
90cum/hour.
The Contractor will start mass bored piles
on 15/09/2015 (waiting for static load test
finished on preliminary test pile) with 3
Bored Pile Teams.
Drilling soil investigation
Preliminary test pile including Ultra sonic
test and static load test
Preparation of static load test and other
test mentioned in specification for
preliminary test pile.
Mobilization of equipments and
construction for Jetty on Pier P7
Casting of concrete blocks for static load
test (95% finished)
Preparation of construction of mass bored
piles.
Preparation of construction of super T
girder
Page 9
1.4. Specific dates (day/month/year) site visits/inspections
The CSC has developed a checklist for inspection of environmental activities of contractor. The supervision consultant’s inspectors have been trained to monitor the day to day activities at batching plant, hot mix plant labour camp, construction sites and project offices of contractor. The checklist is very simple in order to record the site activities and any non-compliance of environment and social safeguards. The CSC inspectors will record the activities on site and submit the checklist in CSC office on weekly basis. The checklist is enclosed as Annexure 1 for reference. This checklist for inspection will be conducted in the next time.
This quarter, CSC have three site inspections and meetings on 9th July, 10
th & 15
th August. Detail
contents of meetings reference in Annexure 7.1. The main contents are summarized as follows:
Updated the progress of SEMP and Subcontractor for Environmental Monitoring; and
Agreements on timeline for implementation follow up actions on disposal areas, batching
plants etc…
2. COMPLIANCE WITH ADB LOAN COVENANTS AND APPLICABLE GOVERNMENT LAWS, REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
EPMU, CSC and Contractors will carry out the work in full compliance with Vietnamese Standards (here refer to TCVN), Vietnamese Regulation (here refer to QCVN), laws, ordinances, other regulations on environment, the approved CEMP, and Engineer’s instructions. The contractor will implement environmental monitoring with the assistance of qualified sub-contractors.” The specific documentation includes:
2.1 Status of compliance with ADB loan covenants
JICA safeguards social environmental guidelines:
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/social_environmental/guideline/pdf/guideline10032/pdf;
ADB safeguards guidelines: the 2009 Safeguards Policy Statements
http://www.adb.org/site/safeguards/policy-statement>;
The IFC EHS (2007) ambient air and water quality and noise level guidelines
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/ifc+su
stainability/sustainability+framework/Sustainability+Framework+-
+2006/Environmental,+Health,+and+Safety+Guidelines/ehsguidelines>;
The overall project EIA and EMP <http://www.adb.org/projects/documents/gms-ben-luc-long-
thanh-expressway-project-multi-tranche-finacing-facility>;
2.2 Status of compliance with government environmental requirements
Vietnam environmental legislation and regulations applicable to this CEMP are based on the following:
Law, Decree and Circular:
Law on Environment Protection (23 Jun. 2014)
Law No.17/2012/QH13 of August 21st 2012, on Water Resources
Law No.13/2003/QH11 of November 26th 2003 Land law is used up to 30/06/2014 and then
replaced by Law No.45/2013/QH13 of November 29, 2013 Land Law
Law on Biodiversity adopted by 13th National Assembly (13 Nov. 2008)
Law No.16/2003/QH11 of November 26th 2003 on Construction Law
Decree of the government No.59/2007/ND-CP of May 09th 2007 on soil waste management
Circular No.12/2011/TT-BTNMT (14 May 2011) on stipulating hazardous waste management
Decision No.04/2008/QD-BTNMT (18 August 2008) promulgating National Technical
Standards (NTS) for the Environment (including QCVN 03:008: NTS on allowable limits of
heavy metals in the soil)
Decree No.179/2013/ND-CP promulgated by the government on 14/11/2013 in regard to
treating case of violations on the environmental protection
Decree No.12/2009/ND-CP promulgated by the government on 12/02/2009 in regard
management of investment projects on the construction of works
Circular No.02/2009/TT-BTNMT, dated on March 19, 2009 of Ministry of Natural Resources
and Environment about Regulations on assessment of the capacity to receive waste water.
Page 10
Applicable Vietnam environmental standards
Standards for Water Quality
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT-National technical regulation on surface water quality;
QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT-National technical regulation on underground water quality;
QCVN 10:2008/BTNMT-National technical regulation on coastal water quality;
QCVN 14:2008/BTNMT-National technical regulation on domestic wastewater;
QCVN 40:2011/BTNMT-National technical regulation for industrial wastewater;
QCVN 01:2009/BYT-National technical regulation on drinking water quality;
Standards for Air Quality
QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT - National technical regulation on ambient air quality;
QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT - National technical regulation on hazardous substances in ambient air;
QCVN 19: 2009/BTNMT - National technical regulation on industrial emission of inorganic substances and dust;
Standards for pollution limit levels in the soil:
QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT: National technical regulations on the allowable limits of heavy metals in soil;
Standards for Noise and Vibration Quality:
TCVN7878 Acoustic - Description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise;
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National technical regulation on noise;
QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT: National technical regulation on vibration;
TCVN 7210:2002: Vibration and shock – Vibration caused by road traffic – Maximum limits for the environment of public and residential areas.
Standard Specifications for management of solid and hazardous wastes
TCVN 6706:2009 Hazardous wastes – Classification;
TCVN 6707:2009 Hazardous wastes – Warning signs;
QCVN 07:2009/BTNMT-National Technical Regulation on Hazardous Waste Thresholds;
Standard Specification for Labour Safety and industrial hygiene
Decision No.3733/2002/QĐ-BYT of Ministry of Health on 10/10/2002 that promulgates to apply 21 standards in Labor safety and Industrial Hygiene:
- Climatic requirements – Standard;
- Noise – Standard;
- Vibration - Standard.
3. CHANGES IN PROJECT SCOPE
There is no change in original scope of work given in IEE and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
report. However as discussed with EPMU-BLLT they want some additional scope of work for
Environmental supervision. The additional scope work consists of following items.
The terrestrial wildlife and biodiversity study in Package-7 is desired by the EPMU-BLLT. There
are mangrove forests in package-7 which will be directly and indirectly affected due to
construction of expressway. The EPMU-BLLT wants to undertake the study on impacts of
construction activities on Mangrove Forest and animals living in this forest. The study is beyond
the scope of work given in TOR. The CSC will employ one subcontractor to carry out this study.
The EPMU-BLLT has desired the study of aquatic ecology of the Package-7. The
subcontractor will be employed by the CSC for this additional study. Also there would be
additional cost for this study as this study is beyond the scope of work of TOR.
Page 11
The other additional study desired by the EPMU-BLLT is to study the future air and noise pollution level due to increase in traffic or vehicle volume on Expressway. The air and noise modeling will be carried out by subcontractor to predict the future air and noise levels on expressway. INCORPORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS INTO PROJECT CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS
All the terms of the UEMP must be in contracts between contractors and investors (represented as
EPMU-BLLT). Also, in each package, each Contractor shall establish an construction environmental
management plan (CEMP). CEMP are prepared in based on UEMP and more updated details to
match the conditions in each package. CEMP is the commitment of the contractor with the investor
and are tested and approved by the CSC and EPMU-BLLT.
4. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIONS AND COMPENSATION MEASURES IMPLEMENTED
At the moment, the contractor of has implemented many countermeasures to mitigate the impacts and
prevent pollution. Below table will present all mitigation measures that contractor of packages has
been conducted already during quarter 3rd
2015.
Table 4: Matrix showing a summary of each environmental mitigation measure specified
EMP Requirement (list all mitigation measures specified in the UEMP)
Compliance Attained
Comment on Reasons for Partial or Non-Compliance
Issues for Further Action and Target Dates to Achieve Compliance
1. Completion of detailed design in accordance with EMP requirements
Partial Construction Environmental Management Plans (CEMPs) were submitted by Contractor A1, A2-1, A2-2 and A3.
The CEMP of all packages were reviewed by Environmental Specialist of CSC. Observations and comments were raised by CSC in order to fulfil the requirement of TOR and EMP.
Revised version of CEMPs was submitted by the contractor.
The CEMP of three packages were approved by the CSC.
The CEMP for Packages A1, A2-1, and A3 were submitted to EPMU for the approval of EPMU.
However the CEMP of Package A2.2 was submitted late by the contractor which was under revision during reporting period.
Ending of November 2015
2. Preparation of tender document included detailed requirements in pollution control and protection of natural ecosystems.
Partial
3. Proper preparation of CEMP by contractors
Partial
4. Evidence of marking of work site boundaries
Yes
5. No cutting trees out side the project ROW
Yes
6. Replanting vegetation damaged by site clearance
Not yet
7. No dumping of all kinds of wastes and cut trees in rivers, canals, ponds and field
Yes
8. General site condition and cleanliness
Yes
9. Covering of all trucks moving to and from site
Partial Sometime, the vehicles transporting the unsuitable material and construction material were not
Was reminded, alerts immediately by CSC, The Contractor committed complete compliance in
Page 12
EMP Requirement (list all mitigation measures specified in the UEMP)
Compliance Attained
Comment on Reasons for Partial or Non-Compliance
Issues for Further Action and Target Dates to Achieve Compliance
covered with tarpaulin. next time
10. Watering road, construction site on rainless day
Yes
11. Registration papers and compliance certificates of construction vehicles with Vietnam Register Authority of Police approved environmental emissions standards
Yes
12. Installation of temporary waste storage areas at each construction site including segregation of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.
Yes
13. Sanitation conditions at construction worker camps, included sewage treatment facilities (toilets), domestic solid wastes management, house keeping etc.
Yes
14. Clean water and safe food supply for workers
Yes
15. Requirements for vegetation waste (cut trees) burning met
Yes
16. Proper organization of material transport to minimize environmental pollution and community disturbance
Yes
17. Condition and effectiveness of erosion controls
Yes
18. Condition and effectiveness of construction waste management
Yes
19. Evidence of soil and/or water acidification due to leakage of acidic water from construction site to surrounding field, canals
No
20. Evidence of direct or indirect disturbance of mangroves and other vegetation outside defined worksite boundaries
No
21. Stabilization, rehabilitation and landscaping of all land surfaces affected by construction activities
Yes
22. Installation of noise and dust control walls
Yes
Page 13
EMP Requirement (list all mitigation measures specified in the UEMP)
Compliance Attained
Comment on Reasons for Partial or Non-Compliance
Issues for Further Action and Target Dates to Achieve Compliance
23. Dust generation during windy conditions
Partial
Initial stage, dust generation during windy conditions such as:
- On the road at Phuoc Ly bridge
- Barrier Sai Gon Trung Luong and Phuoc Ly
During initial stage of implementation the effectiveness and focus on environmental mitigation measures was very limited from contractor side. However due to regular monitoring and instructions from CSC on environmental safeguards the situation become better in August and September particularly for dust control and waste management.
24. Number and type of community complaints on environmental issues received
Partial Detailed review of item 8 of this report
Detailed review of item 8 of this report
25. Mangrove replanting for compensation of mangrove area lost by the project at the Thi Vai river, Long Tau and Soai Rap river banks
Not yet
implement
The work in ADB section started only few months ago. However the Package J2 of JICA started one
year back. The contractors are not yet fully understand the environmental requirements of the project.
Therefore the progress of Environmental management was slow initially but it is gradually improving
since the mobilization of Environmental Specialist of CSC. The Environmental specialist of CSC is
continuously monitoring the activities of all contractors and instructing them onsite as well as through
instruction letter on regular basis.
5. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
The Baseline Environmental Monitoring for Air, Water, and Noise & Vibration has been done by all civil
contractors except Package 2.2 of ADB section. Result of environmental monitoring programs is
presented as below:
6.1 Package A1
6.1.1 Monitoring location at package A1
The sampling locations are located along the project, specifically described follow:
Location
Coordinates
Description
N E
BLLTA1/ K1 N:10
040’13,7’’ E:106
032’54,3”
Km1+800 area. Near citizen area farm 7A, My
Yen commune, Ben Luc district, Long An province
BLLTA1/ K2 N:10
039’42,1’’ E:106
033’42,9”
Km 3+600 area (connection point of National road
1A of Farm 2, Binh Chanh commune, Binh
Chanh district, Ho Chi Minh city)
BLLTA1/ K3 N:10
039’14,8’’ E:106
034’27,8”
Km 5+500 area ( Area near citizen area of Farm 3,
Binh Chanh commune, Binh Chanh district, Ho
Chi Minh city)
BLLTA1/ K4 N:10
039’18,8’’ E:106
035’47,0” Km 7+000 area (area in the middle of field in Farm
4, Tan Quy Tay commune, Binh Chanh district,
Page 14
Location
Coordinates
Description
N E
Ho Chi Minh city)
BLLTA1/ NM-1 N:10040’13,6’’ E:106
032’03,7”
Surface water in Km 2+300, surface water sample
in the point of 500m far from Ong Thoan bridge to
the downstream, 150m far from the expressway
(in Farm 7a, My Yen commune)
BLLTA1/ NM-2 N:10039’18,2’’ E:106
035’47,1”
Surface water in Km 7+500, water sample in
irrigation canal in Farm 4, Tan Quy Tay commune,
Binh Chanh district, 50m far from the expressway
BLLTA1/NG1 N:10040’14,3’’ E:106
032’55,1”
Underground water in Km 1+800 (water in
borewell in Farm 7A, My Yen commune, Ben Luc
district, Long An province)
BLLTA1/NG2 N:10
039’13,9’’ E:106
034’28,1”
Underground water in Km 5+500 (water in
borewell in citizen area of Farm 3, Binh Chanh
commune commune, Binh Chanh district, Ho Chi
Minh city)
BLLTA1/Đ1 N:10040’13,8’’ E:106
032’54,8”
Soil sample in km 1+800 of Farm 7A, My Yen
commune, Ben Luc district, Long An province
BLLTA1/Đ2 N:10
039’15,8’’ E:106
034’26,9”
Soil sample in Km 5+500 of Farrm 3, Binh Chanh
commune, Binh Chanh district, Ho Chi Minh city
6.1.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A1
6.1.2.1 Air quality
Page 15
a) Result in Monitoring point K1:
Statistics of monitoring result in K1:
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 31.6 73.4 0.7 0.143 1.45 0.082 0.019 0.068 0.97
2 18h - 22h 30.2 70.8 0.9 0.123 1.38 0.75 0.017 0.070 0.94
3 22h - 06h 26.9 75.3 1.0 0.106 1.32 0.067 0.015 0.056 0.89
Average 0.124 1.383 0.300 0.017 0.065 0.933
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 21st and 22
nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN
05:2013/BTNMT).
Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
In summary, the quality of ambient air at Monitoring point K1 is not contaminated by CO, SO2, NO2, dust TSP, dust PM10
b) Result in Monitoring point K2:
Statistics of monitoring result in K2:
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 32.1 71.8 1.0 0.327 2.79 0.143 0.045 0.168 1.23
2 18h - 22h 30.1 72.4 0.8 0.295 2.32 0.137 0.039 0.158 1.15
3 22h - 06h 28.3 73.9 1.2 0.224 2.14 0.108 0.032 0.127 1.06
Average 0.282 2.417 0.129 0.039 0.151 1.147
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Page 16
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 21st and 22
nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN
05:2013/BTNMT) except average dust concentration. However, construction activities are not happen; so, almost dust arise from high concentration of transportation vehicle on National road 1 A
Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
c) Result in Monitoring point K3:
Statistics of monitoring result in K3:
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 32.8 70.2 0.6 0.156 1.67 0.122 0.022 0.093 1.02
2 18h - 22h 31.0 73.7 0.7 0.133 1.59 0.089 0.020 0.078 0.95
3 22h - 06h 28.7 74.5 0.9 0.102 1.32 0.074 0.017 0.069 0.79
Average 0.130 1.527 0.095 0.020 0.080 0.920
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 21st and 22
nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN
05:2013/BTNMT).
Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
In summary, the quality of ambient air at Monitoring point K3 is not contaminated by CO, SO2, NO2, dust TSP, dust PM10
d) Result in Monitoring point K4:
Statistics of monitoring result in K4
Page 17
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (
0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 33.4 69.3 1.1 0.132 1.47 0.103 0.014 0.067 0.79
2 18h - 22h 29.7 71.4 0.9 0.105 1.28 0.077 0.012 0.063 0.63
3 22h - 06h 27.5 72.8 1.2 0.095 1.16 0.063 0.010 0.058 0.58
Average 0.111 1.303 0.081 0.012 0.063 0.667
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 21st and 22
nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN
05:2013/BTNMT).
Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
In summary, the quality of ambient air at Monitoring point K4 is not contaminated by CO, SO2, NO2, dust TSP, dust PM10
Page 18
6.1.2.2 Noise quality
Noise monitoring is conducted for 24 hours per monitoring day. Results are as bellow :
Parameters
From 6h to 18h From 18h to 22h From 22h to 6h
Average Over
QCVN Average
Over QCVN
Average Over QCVN
K1
Leq 58.3 0 57.9 0 46.7 0
L50 53.8 - 52.0 - 42.6 -
L90 60.1 - 59.6 - 48.5 -
Lmax 63.3 - 61.0 - 50.9 -
K2
Leq 68.9 0 64.8 0 58.5 1.06
L50 63.6 - 62.5 - 57.9 -
L90 72.7 - 70.4 - 66.5 -
Lmax 78.3 - 74.9 - 70.9 -
K3
Leq 60.2 0 57.9 0 50.4 0
L50 58.6 - 55.4 - 48.3 -
L90 63.7 - 61.2 - 53.1 -
Lmax 66.4 - 64.5 - 53.9 -
K4
Leq 53.1 0 50.4 0 47.5 0
L50 50.4 - 48.9 - 45.1 -
L90 55.1 - 54.3 - 49.6 -
Lmax 58.8 - 56.6 - 50.3 -
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT 70 55
Note: QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on Noise – Noise levels apply to
common areas. Unit: dBA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
06h00-18h00 18h00-22h00 22h00-06h00
K1
K2
K3
K4
Comment on noise level:
Data in the above table shows that:
- Equivalent sound level (Leq) measured from 6h to 22h ranged from 50,4 to 68,9 dBA. Those results are lower than limitation level regulated on Vietnam standard
- Equivalent sound level (Leq) measured from 22h to 06h ranged from 46,7 to 58,5 dBA. In which, sound level in K2 higher than allowed level on QCVN 1,06 times. This caused by transportation activities in National Road 1A.
Page 19
6.1.2.3 Vibration quality
Vibaration monitoring is conducted for 24 hours per monitoring day. Results are as bellow:
No Time (h) Result of average acceleration monitoring (m/s
2)
K1 K2 K3 K4
1 6h00 - 18h00 0.025 0.058 0.022 0.027
2 18h00 - 21h00 0.0189 0.049 0.017 0.016
3 21h00 - 06h00 0.0173 0.026 0.015 0.014
Average 0.0204 0.044 0.018 0.019
QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT (Vibration acceleration
m/s2)
0.055 0.055 0.055 0.055
Note : vibration level in above table is average value
As regulation, vibration acceleration is below 0.55 m/s2 or 75dB from 6h to 21h in common areas and
platform level at night. So, as in Table 5 vibration value is lower than allowed limitation and average
vibration acceleration fluctuate from 0.018 to 0.044 m/s2
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
06h00-18h00 18h00-22h00 22h00-06h00
K1
K2
K3
K4
Comment:
Based on data on above table: Average vibration level fluctuates from 0.018 to 0.044 m/s2
and below
allowed limitation stipulated on QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT.
6.1.2.4 Surface water quality
Surface water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit
Result QCVN 08:2008
/BTNMT. column B
NM-1 NM-2 Column
B1 Column
B2
1 pH
- 6.3 6.8 5.5 - 9 5.5 - 9
2 DO
mg/l 4.4 4.1 ≥ 4 ≥ 2
3 Salinity ppt 0.6 0.6 - -
4 Conductivity
ms/cm 1.16 1.19 - -
5 Turbidity
NTU 7.7 18.5 - -
6 TSS
mg/l 8.4 13.7 50 100
7 NO2-
mg/l 0.015 0.013 0.04 0.05
8 NO3-
mg/l 0.97 0.68 10 15
9 NH4+
mg/l 0.23 0.19 0.5 1
10 PO43-
mg/l 0.07 0.06 0.3 0.5
11 COD
mg/l 24.8 28.1 30 50
12 BOD5
mg/l 12.6 13.9 15 25
13 Fe
mg/l 0.12 0.10 1.5 2
14 Mn mg/l 0.021 0.027 - -
15 Zn
mg/l 0.084 0.073 1.5 2
Page 20
No Parameter Unit Result
QCVN 08:2008 /BTNMT. column B
NM-1 NM-2 Column
B1 Column
B2
16 As
mg/l <0.0005 <0.0005 0.05 0.1
17 Al mg/l 2.77 2.05 - -
18 Oil and grease
mg/l 0.06 0.04 0.1 0.3
19 Coliform MPN/100ml 2800 1900 7500 10000
20 E.coli MPN/100ml 10 7 100 200
Note: QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT – National standard for surface water quality.
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in surface water samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower
than standards on QCVN 08:2008 /BTNMT, column B1.
6.1.2.5 Underground water quality
Underground water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN 09:2008
/BTNMT. column B NG-1 NG-2
1 pH
- 6.8 6.6 5.5 - 8.5
2 Salinity ms/cm 0.158 0.152 -
3 Conductivity
NTU 0 0 -
4 Turbidity
ppt 0 0.1 -
5 TSS
mg/l 0 0 -
6 NO2-
mg/l 0.02 0.026 1.0
7 NO3-
mg/l 0.67 0.60 15
8 NH4+
mg/l <0.02 <0.02 0.1
9 COD
mg/l 3.6 3.3 4
10 Fe
mg/l 1.09 0.78 5
11 Mn mg/l 0.32 0.26 0.5
12 Zn
mg/l 0.25 0.19 3.0
13 Al mg/l 1.78 1.32 -
14 As
mg/l <0.0005 <0.0005 0.05
15 E.Coli VK/100ml NDT NDT Not found
16 Oil & grease
mg/l 0 0 -
Note: QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT – National standard for underground water quality. NDT: Not detected.
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in underground water samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower than standards on QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT.
6.1.2.6 Soil quality monitoring
Soil quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN
03:2008/BTNMT Đ-1 Đ-2
1 pHKCl - 4,9 4,4 -
2 Pb mg/kg 11,7 13,2 70
3 Cd mg/kg 0,084 0,067 2
4 Cu mg/kg 11,6 13,1 50
5 Zn mg/kg 32,5 39,2 200
6 As mg/kg 0,47 0,58 12
7 Total oil and grease
mg/kg 1,32 1,15
-
Page 21
Note: QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT – National standard for some heavy metals in the soil
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in soil samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower than standards on QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT.
6.2 Package A2-1
6.2.1 Monitoring location at package A2-1
The sampling locations are located along the project, specifically described follow:
- Detail of locations for sampling ambient air, noise, vibration:
Locations Coordinate Date monitoring
Time Symbol of sample
Intersection
of BL-LT highway with Doan Nguyen Tuan
(A1)
10039’22.5’N
106036’43.7’’E
27/08/2015
10h05’-11h00 A2-1.0.A1-1
20h45-21h30’ A2-1.0.A1-2
22h10’-23h00’ A2-1.0.A1-3
Intersection
of BL-LT highway 3,4,5 hamlet road
(A2)
10039’124’’N
106038’39.4’’E
27/08/2015
13h30’-14h30’ A2-1.0.A2-1
19h40’-20h30’ A2-1.0.A2-2
23h15’-24h00’ A2-1.0.A2-3
- Detail of sampling surface water:
Location/ Coordinate Date monitoring Time Symbol of sample
Vam Ong Do
canal 10
039’25.9’’N
106037’26.1’’E
27/08/2015
11h15-Ebb tide A2-1.0.SW2
19h45-Flood tide A2-1.0.SW1
- Detail of sampling soil:
Parameter Method Frequency Reference
Standard
Location/
Symbol of
sample
Coordinate Date
monitoring
pH(KCl) TCVN
5979:2007
3 m
onth
s/t
ime
QCVN 03:2008/
BTNMT,
agricultural
land
Garden
soil, near site/
A2-1.0.S1
10o39
’17.71
’’ N
106o36
’16.36
’’E
27/0
8/1
5
As EPA 1311
200.7
Cd
TCVN
6649:2000
TCVN 6496-
2009
Cu
Pb
Zn
Oil SMEWW
5520E:2012
- Monitoring for ground water
Page 22
Location/ Symbol of
sample Coordinate Frequency Date monitoring
Ground water on well at site
(A2-1.0.GW1)
10039’16.3’’N
106036’17.8’’E 3 months/time
9h35
27/08/2015
6.2.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A2-1
6.2.2.1 Air quality
Air ambient monitoring results:
Symbol of sample
Temperature
Humidity Wind TSP PM10 NO2 SO2 CO CxHy
0C % m/s µg/m
3 µg/m
3 µg/m
3 µg/m
3 µg/m
3 µg/m
3
A2-1.0.A1-1 32.2 59.5 1.2-2.8 260 82 120 190 10024 1080
A2-1.0.A1-2 28.5 71.0 0.4-0.6 200 80 118 175 9540 905
A2-1.0.A1-3 27.1 73.5 0.8-1.0 189 112 110 186 9030 756
A2-1.0.A2-1 34.2 51.0 0.5-1.0 380 109 110 195 10530 915
A2-1.0.A2-2 28.3 84.2 0.3-0.6 250 105 109 138 9680 712
A2-1.0.A2-3 27.0 73.4 0.5-0.9 270 87 115 120 9030 542
QCVN 05:2013 /BTNMT,1h
- - - 300
150 (*)
200 350 30000 -
QCVN 06:2009 /BTNMT,1h
- - - - - - - - 5000
IFC guideline, 1h - - - - 150 (*)
200 125 (*)
- -
Note: (*): 24h average value - QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality- applied to inorganic
matters. - QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality- applied to organic
matters. - IFC guideline, 1h: IFC Guidelines: Environmental, Health, and Safety General Guidelines
Page 23
Comments:
TSP
The concentration of dust at all monitoring sites in baseline environment varied from 189 to 380µg/m
3. Maximum dust concentration is 380 µg/m
3 at A2-1.0.A2-1 (13-14h), minimum concentration
is 189 µg/m3
at A-2.0.A1-3 (23-24h). Maximum dust concentration at A2-1.0.A2-1 (13-14h) is higher than the allowed limit of 300 µg/m
3 (is fixed by QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT, 1h). It is due to the 3,4,5
hamlet road is been expending and repairing so make high dust level. Then, contractor need to watering for surface road two times per day in sunny day.
PM10
National technical regulation on ambient air (QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT) do not fix for PM10 at average of 1h, so this report will be compared with average of 24h. Limit level of PM10 regulation on IFC guidelines with average of 24h is 150 µg/m
3, too. The concentration of dust (PM10) at all
monitoring sites in baseline environment varied from 80 to 112 µg/m3. All of the concentrations of
PM10 of baseline environment were lower than the allowable limits given in and IFC guidelines and QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT (regulated the concentration of MP10: 150 µg/m
3 for 24h). The highest
concentration of PM10 recorded at A2-1.0.A2-1 (112µg/m3). At A2-1 location, the local road is been
expending and repairing so it cause high dust level.
NO2
The concentration of NO2 at all monitoring sites in baseline environment varied in the range of 109 – 120 µg/m
3, all values completely satisfy the limited value of the standard QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT
(regulated the concentration of NO2:200µg/m3). The highest concentration of NOx recorded at A2-
1.0.A1-1 (120 µg/m3) and lowest at A2-1.0.A2-2 (109 µg/m
3) monitoring sites.
Allowable limits of NOx regulated by 1h average is 200 µg/m3. The concentration of NOx at all
monitoring sites in baseline environment are in range of IFC guidelines.
SO2
The concentration of SO2 at all monitoring sites in baseline environment varied from 120 to 195 µg/m
3. All of values were lower than the allowable limits given in QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT (regulated
the concentration of SO2: 300µg/m3). The highest concentration of SO2 recorded at A2-1.0.A2-1 (10h-
11h) is 195 µg/m3 and lowest is 120 µg/m
3at A2-1.0.A2-3 (23h-24h).
Allowable limits of SO2 regulated by IFC guidelines with 24h average is 125 µg/m3. The
concentration of SO2 at all monitoring sites in baseline environment are in range of IFC guidelines.
Page 24
CO
The concentration of CO at all monitoring sites in baseline environment varied from 9030 to 10530 µg/m
3. All of values were lower than the allowable limits given in QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT (regulated
the concentration of CO: 3000 µg/m3). The highest concentration of CO recorded at A2-1.0.A2-1
(10530 µg/m3)(13h-14h) and lowest is 9030 µg/m
3at A2-1.0.A2-3 (23h-24h).
CxHy
The concentration of CxHy at all monitoring sites in baseline environment varied from 542 to 1080 µg/m
3. All of CxHy values were lower than the allowable limits given in QCVN 06:2009/BTNMT, 1h
(regulated the concentration of CxHy: 5000 µg/m3). The highest concentration of CxHy recorded at A2-
1.0.A1-1 is 1080 µg/m3and lowest is 542 µg/m
3at A21-1.0.A2-3.
6.2.2.2 Noise and vibration quality
Noise monitoring is conducted for 24 hours per monitoring day. Results are as bellow :
Ký hiệu mẫu
Noise Vibration Acceleration Leq Lpeak L50
dBA dBA dBA m/s2
A2-1.0.A1-1 71.3 84.9 68.7 0.040
A2-1.0.A1-2 69.3 83.7 63.8 0.035
A2-1.0.A1-3 59.0 77.5 52.1 0.030
A2-1.0.A2-1 72.6 93.1 61.8 0.039
A2-1.0.A2-2 63.6 81.2 58.2 0.036
A2-1.0.A2-3 55.6 75.6 45.5 0.030
IFC Guidelines, 1h Daytime: 55 dBA Nighttime: 45 dBA
-
QCVN26:2010 /BTNMT
6-21h: 70 dBA 21-6h: 55 dBA
-
QCVN 27:2010 /BTNMT
- 0.055
Note:
- QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National technical regulation on noise- applied tonormalareasfrom 6h-21h.
- QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT: National technical regulation on Vibration applied tonormalareasfrom 6-21h.
- IFC Guidelines: Environmental, Health, and Safety General Guidelines
Page 25
a) Comment on noise level:
Noise level in the daytime
Noise level in the daytime at two monitoring locations in baseline environment varied from 71.3 to 72.6 dBA.
In that, the average noise levels were higher than the allowable maximum of noise regulated in QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT, regulate the maximum of noise level in common areas (residential areas, the individual houses are separated or adjacent, hotels, motels and administrative agencies) period from 06h00-21h00 is 70.0dBA. It is due to the location road have a lot of traffic mean passing in the daytime. Addition, at 3,4,5 hamlet road is repairing, and have a lot of trucks. It is cause the high noise level.
Noise level in the early evening
Noise level in the early evening at two monitoring locations in baseline environment varied from 63.3to 69.3 dBA.
In that, the average noise levels were higher than the allowable maximum of noise regulated in QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT, regulate the maximum of noise level in common areas (residential areas, the individual houses are separated or adjacent, hotels, motels and administrative agencies) period from 06h00-21h00 is 70.0dBA. It is due to the location road have a lot of traffic mean passing in the time. Addition, at 3,4,5 hamlet road is repairing, and have a lot of trucks. It is cause the high noise level.
Noise level in the midnight
Noise level in the midnight at two monitoring locations in baseline environment varied from 55.6 to 59.0 dBA.
In that, the noise levels were higher than the allowable maximum of noise regulated in QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT, regulate the maximum of noise level in common areas (residential areas, the individual houses are separated or adjacent, hotels, motels and administrative agencies) periodfrom21h00-6h00is55.0dBA.
However, these noise levels meet in IFC’s guidelines regarding the noise limits for different working environment (No employee should be exposed to a noise level greater than 85 dBA for a duration of more than 8 hours per day without hearing protection)
b) Comment on vibration level:
On QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT – National technical regulation on vibration regulated for the maximum vibration in residential areas, the individual houses are separated or adjacent, hotels, motels and administrative agencies: 0.055m/s
2.
The vibration accelerations measured at two monitoring points and three times per day in baseline environment varied in the range of 0.030 – 0.040 m/s
2, these values were lower than the allowable
limits given in QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT. In that, the highest value of vibration accelerations recorded at A2-1.0.A1-1 (0.040m/s
2) and lowest at A2-1.0.A1-3, A2-1.0.A2-3, (0.030 m/s
2) monitoring sites.
6.2.2.3 Surface water quality
Surface water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN
08:2008/BTNMT, cat A2
A2-1.0.SW1
1 pH
- 6.78 5.5-9
2 DO
mg/l 32 5.5-9 -
3 Salinity ppt 562 - -
4 Conductivity
ms/cm 957 - -
5 Turbidity
NTU 40 - 50
6 TSS
mg/l 4.6 50 ≥4
7 NO2-
mg/l 35 ≥4 30
8 NO3-
mg/l 18 30 15
9 NH4+
mg/l 2.69 15 0.5
10 PO43-
mg/l 1.25 0.5 0.04
11 COD
mg/l KPH
LOD=0.01 0.04 10
12 BOD5
mg/l 0.38 10 0.3
Page 26
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN
08:2008/BTNMT, cat A2
A2-1.0.SW1
13 Fe
mg/l 0.301 0.3 1.5
14 Mn mg/l KPH
LOD=0.02 1.5 -
15 Zn
mg/l KPH
LOD=0.005 - 0.05
16 As
mg/l KPH
LOD=0.01 0.05 -
17 Al mg/l KPH
LOD=0.03 - 1.5
18 Oil and grease
mg/l 0.06 1.5 0.1
19 Coliform MPN/100ml 1100 0.1 7500
20 E.coli MPN/100ml 46 7500 100
Note:
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT: National technical regulation on surface water quality:
Cat A1: Good using for water supply purposes and for other purposes such as type A2, B1, B2
Cat A2: Using for water supply purposes but must apply suitable treatment technologies; conservation
of aquatic life, or use as B1 and B2.
Cat B1: Using for irrigation and aquaculture or other purposes such as type B
Analysis & evaluation:
There is no much difference between flood tide and ebb tide. Surface water in the existing canal with
no sign of pollution by heat, no sign of contamination of organic matter (COD, BOD5, DO) and
nutrients matter (NH4+, N-NO2
-, N-NO3
-, P-PO4
3-). Most heavy metals are not detected. All indicators of
surface water samples were lower than the permitted value of column B1, QCVN 08: 2008 / BTNMT
fix for irrigation and aquaculture or other purposes.
6.2.2.4 Underground water quality
Underground water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
Parameter
Unit
Results QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT
A2-1.0.GW1
pH - 5.82 5.5-8.5
Turbidity NTU 19 -
Sanility mg/l 79.8 -
EC µS/cm 137 -
TSS mg/l NDT
LOD=5 -
CODMn mg/l 4 4
N-NH4+ mg/l
NDT LOD=0.01
0.1
N-NO3- mg/l 0.08 15
N-NO2- mg/l
NDT LOD=0.01
1
Fe mg/l 4.560 5
Al mg/l NDT
LOD=0.02 -
As mg/l NDT
LOD=0.005 0.05
Page 27
Note: QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT – National standard for underground water quality. NDT: Not detected.
Comments:
Ground water sample at well in site has all of parameters are under the allowed limit value fix in QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT. However, the Fe parameter is high, groundwater samples were alum.
6.2.2.5 Soil quality monitoring
Soil quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN
03:2008/BTNMT A2-1.0.S1
1 pHKCl - 6.01 -
2 Pb mg/kg 1.72 70
3 Cd mg/kg 47.68 2
4 Cu mg/kg 5.61 50
5 Zn mg/kg 65.21 200
6 As mg/kg 0.020 12
7 Total oil and grease mg/kg 105.7 -
Note: QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT – National standard for some heavy metals in the soil
Comments:
pH
Index of a soil’s acidity or alkalinity:
Mn mg/l 0.030 0.5
Zn mg/l NDT
LOD=0.03 3
Oil mg/l ND
LOD=0.3 -
E.coli MPN/100 ml NDT NDT
Page 28
Soil pH and Interpretation
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
Strong
acid
Medium
Acid
Slight
Acid
Neutral Neutral Middle
Alkaline
Moderate
Alkaline Best range for Most Crops
Currently, in Vietnam, there is no standard specifying the allowed limit of pH in soil. pH(KCl) is tested according to the water-dissolved method (with the soil/KCl ratio of 1:5 (v:v), pH(KCl) value of soil is 6.01, itis slight acid.
As, Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd
The constructions activities may raise to heavy metals include:
- Spillage/leakage of oil fuel waste, digging sediment, sludge to surface
- Smoke, coal dust from the burning of petrol and oil
- Solid, waste management waste not reasonably lead to leaching.
- Set metal materials at outdoor causing rust. Concentration of As,Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd in soil content of sample is enraged of QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT - Argicultural Land (regulated for the content of heavy metals on soil applied toagricultural land included: As: 12mg/kg dry weight; Cu: 50mg/kg dry weight; Pb: 70mg/kg dry weight; Zn: 200mg/kg dry weight; Cd: 2mg/kg dry weight).
Oil
Currently, in Vietnam, there is no standard specifying the allowed limit of oil in soil. Oil value is tested according to weight method is 105.7 mg/kg dry weight.
6.3 Package A3
6.3.1 Monitoring location at package A3
The sampling locations are located along the project, specifically described follow:
Location Coordinates
Description N E
BLLTA3/ K1 N:10039’36,3’’ E:106
041’10,7”
Km 16+900 area, near citizen areal of Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha Be district, Ho Chi Minh city
BLLTA3/ K2 N:10039’50,5’’ E:106
041’35,9”
Km 17+700 area, near citizen areal of Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha Be district, Ho Chi Minh city
BLLTA3/ NM-1 N:10039’39,5’’ E:106
041’03,4”
Surface water in Km 16+800, surface water sample in Guoc river
BLLTA3/ NM-2 N:10039’51,4’’ E:106
041’36,2”
Surface water in Km 17+700, taken from irrigation canal in Farm 4, Nhon duc commune, Nha Ba district, 30m far from BL-LT expressway
BLLTA3/NG1 N:10039’35,3’’ E:106
041’02,7”
Underground water in Km 16+900 (water in holewell of a household in Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha Be district, Ho chi Minh city)
BLLTA3/NG2 N:10039’51,3’’ E:106
041’66,4”
Underground water in Km 17+200 (water in holewell of a household in Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha Be district, Ho chi Minh city)
BLLTA3/Đ1 N:10039’55,1’’ E:106
041’03,4”
Soil sample in km 16+800 , Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha be district
BLLTA3/Đ2 N:10039’51,5’’ E:106
041’66,0”
Soil sample in km 17+200 , Farm 4, Nhon Duc commune, Nha be district
Page 29
6.3.2 Results of environmental monitoring for pre-construction phase at Package A3
6.3.2.1 Air quality
a) Result in Monitoring point K1:
Statistics of monitoring result in K1:
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 34.1 67.5 1.1 0.167 1.79 0,098 0,023 0,075 0,88
2 18h - 22h 30.9 68.1 0.9 0.132 1.45 0,830 0,021 0,069 0,90
3 22h - 06h 28.2 72.2 1.3 0.114 1.41 0,077 0,019 0,060 0,84
Average 0.138 1.550 0.084 0.021 0.068 0.873
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
- Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 22st and 23nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT).
- Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
In summary, the quality of ambient air at Monitoring point K1 is not contaminated by CO, SO2, NO2, dust TSP, dust PM10
b) Result in Monitoring point K2:
Statistics of monitoring result in K2:
No Time
Microclimate parameters Air parameters
Temperature (0C)
Humidity (%)
Wind speed (m/s)
TSP
(mg/m3)
CO (mg/m3) SO2 (mg/m
3)
NO2
(mg/m3)
PM10
(mg/m3)
CxHy
(mg/m3)
1 06h - 18h 34.6 63.7 1.1 0.195 1.89 0.099 0.031 0.105 1.06
2 18h - 22h 30.2 66.5 1.0 0.172 1.67 0.083 0.027 0.095 0.95
3 22h - 06h 29.1 69.1 0.8 0.156 1.32 0.077 0.024 0.079 0.81
Average 0.174 1.627 0.086 0.027 0.093 0.940
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 1 hour) 0.3 30 0.35 0.2 - 5*
QCVN 05-2013/BTNMT (Average in 24 hour) 0.2 - 0.125 0.1 - 1.5*
Page 30
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with reference standards. Data in the above table shows that:
- Concentration of all ambient air parameters monitored on 22st and 23nd August, 2015 is below the limitation stipulated on Vietnamese standard (QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT).
- Concentration of dust PM10 (average in 1 hour) don’t have Vietnamese standard for reference.
In summary, the quality of ambient air at Monitoring point K2 is not contaminated by CO, SO2, NO2, dust TSP, dust PM10.
Page 31
6.3.2.2 Noise quality
Noise monitoring is conducted for 24 hours per monitoring day. Results are as bellow :
Parameters
From 6h to 18h From 18h to 22h From 22h to 6h
Average Over
QCVN Average
Over QCVN
Average Over QCVN
K1
Leq 56,1 0 55,2 0 41,4 0
L50 52,3 - 51,9 - 39,1 -
L90 58,9 - 56,3 - 43,5 -
Lmax 61,7 - 58,8 - 50,4 -
K2
Leq 58,1 0 57,4 0 43,6 0
L50 54,9 - 53,1 - 40,9 -
L90 59,1 - 58,7 - 45,6 -
Lmax 64,9 - 63,2 - 49,3 -
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT 70 55
Note: QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on Noise – Noise levels apply to
common areas. Unit: dBA
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
06h00-18h00 18h00-22h00 22h00-06h00
K1
K2
Comment on noise level:
Data in the above table shows that:
- Equivalent sound level (Leq) measured from 6h to 22h ranged from 55,2 to 61,7 dBA. Those
results are lower than limitation level regulated on Vietnam standard
- Equivalent sound level (Leq) measured from 22h to 06h ranged from 41,4 to 43,6 dBA. Those
results are lower than limitation level regulated on Vietnam standard
6.3.2.3 Vibration quality
Vibaration monitoring is conducted for 24 hours per monitoring day. Results are as bellow:
No Time (h) Result of average acceleration monitoring (m/s
2)
K1 K2
1 6h00 - 18h00 0.021 0.036
2 18h00 - 21h00 0.0194 0.030
3 21h00 - 06h00 0.0186 0.019
Average 0.020 0.028
QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT (Vibration acceleration
m/s2)
0.055 0.055
Page 32
Note : vibration level in above table is average value
As regulation, vibration acceleration is below 0.55 m/s2 or 75dB from 6h to 21h in common areas and
platform level at night. So, as in Table 5 vibration value is lower than allowed limitation and average
vibration acceleration fluctuate from 0.018 to 0.044 m/s2
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
06h00-18h00 18h00-22h00 22h00-06h00
K1
K2
Comment:
Based on data on above table:
- Average vibration level fluctuates from 0,020 to 0,0284 m/s2 and below allowed limitation
stipulated on QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT.
6.3.2.4 Surface water quality
Surface water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit
Result QCVN 08:2008
/BTNMT. column B
NM-1 NM-2 Column
B1 Column
B2
1 pH
- 6.9 7.1 5.5 - 9 5.5 - 9
2 DO
mg/l 4.7 4.9 ≥ 4 ≥ 2
3 Salinity ppt 0.8 1.0 - -
4 Conductivity
ms/cm 1.60 1.93 - -
5 Turbidity
NTU 36 27.3 - -
6 TSS
mg/l 25.7 16.9 50 100
7 NO2-
mg/l 0.033 0.037 0.04 0.05
8 NO3-
mg/l 1.36 0.968 10 15
9 NH4+
mg/l 0.34 0.22 0.5 1
10 PO43-
mg/l 0.14 0.17 0.3 0.5
11 COD
mg/l 26.7 23.1 30 50
12 BOD5
mg/l 13.3 12.4 15 25
13 Fe
mg/l 0.17 0.16 1.5 2
14 Mn mg/l 0.006 0.020 - -
15 Zn
mg/l 0.091 0.14 1.5 2
16 As
mg/l <0.0005 <0.0005 0.05 0.1
17 Al mg/l 2.12 1.72 - -
18 Oil and grease
mg/l 0.08 0.08 0.1 0.3
19 Coliform MPN/100ml 3200 2200 7500 10000
20 E.coli MPN/100ml 26 15 100 200
Note: QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT – National standard for surface water quality.
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in surface water samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower
than standards on QCVN 08:2008 /BTNMT, column B1.
Page 33
6.3.2.5 Underground water quality
Underground water quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN 09:2008
/BTNMT. column B NG-1 NG-2
1 pH
- 7.3 6.8 5.5 - 8.5
2 Salinity ms/cm 0.255 0.068 -
3 Conductivity
NTU 0 0 -
4 Turbidity
ppt 0.1 0 -
5 TSS
mg/l 0 0 -
6 NO2-
mg/l 0.04 0.047 1.0
7 NO3-
mg/l 0.75 0.74 15
8 NH4+
mg/l <0.02 <0.02 0.1
9 COD
mg/l 3.8 3.5 4
10 Fe
mg/l 0.84 0.47 5
11 Mn mg/l 0.21 0.14 0.5
12 Zn
mg/l 0.17 0.21 3.0
13 Al mg/l 1.99 1.73 -
14 As
mg/l <0.0005 <0.0005 0.05
15 E.Coli VK/100ml NDT NDT Not found
16 Oil & grease
mg/l 0 0 -
Note: QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT – National standard for underground water quality. NDT: Not detected.
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in underground water samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower than standards on QCVN 09:2008/BTNMT.
6.3.2.6 Soil quality monitoring
Soil quality monitoring is carried out for a day with results as below:
No Parameter Unit Result QCVN
03:2008/BTNMT Đ-1 Đ-2
1 pHKCl - 5.2 4.9 -
2 Pb mg/kg 13.1 12.7 70
3 Cd mg/kg 0.137 0.044 2
4 Cu mg/kg 15.4 16.3 50
5 Zn mg/kg 36.6 42.5 200
6 As mg/kg 0.35 0.37 12
7 Total oil and grease
mg/kg 1.57 1.62
-
Note: QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT – National standard for some heavy metals in the soil
Comments:
The analytical results are compared with QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT:
Contents of all parameters in soil samples in pre-construction stage monitored were lower than standards on QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT.
6.4 Package J2
6.4.1 Monitoring location at Package J2
The sampling locations are implemented in Sep 2015 only include: TSP, PM10, noise and vibration
and surface wate, waste water and emission air. The sampling locations specifically described in
following:
No Symbol Coordinates Description
Page 34
N E
Air, noise and vibration
1 KK1 10°39'5.40"N 106°46'59.85"E Residential area near by J2 –Way the service road of 100 m to the South
2 KK2 10°38'29.27"N 106°47'19.46"E Household area that is nearly batching plan No.02
3 KK3 10°37'40.53"N 106°47'58.01"E
Residential area near the dump excavated soil – Way the road transport to disposal area 50 m to the north
Surface water
1 NM1 10°39'11.99"N 106°45'17.01"E Soai Rap River - at location that receive wastewater from Accommodation Workers No.1
2 NM2 10°39'3.10"N 106°45'47.62"E Cha river – at location that build Song Cha bridge
3 NM3 10°38'43.10"N 106°46'9.49"E Soai Rap River - at location that receive wastewater from concrete batching plant
4 NM4 10°38'57.71"N 106°46'43.18"E Canal - at location that receive wastewater from Accommodation Workers No.2
5 NM (D2) 10°38'53.37"N 106°45'4.29"E Rach Dia River - at location nearly Disposal No.02
Waste water
1 NT1 10°39'18.48"N 106°45'2.65"E Wastewater from Accommodation Workers No.1
2 NT2 10°39'11.29"N 106°45'18.84" Wastewater from concrete batching plant of Area 1
3 NT3 10°38'42.53"N 106°46'14.85"E Wastewater from concrete batching plant of Area 2
4 NT4 10°38'55.85"N 106°46'45.90"E Wastewater from Accommodation Workers No.2
Emission
1 E1 10°39'6.50"N 106°45'44.35"E Exhaust pipe from concrete batching plant of Area 1
2 E2 10°38'58.02"N 106°46'24.71"E Exhaust pipe from from concrete batching plant of Area 2
Soil
1 S1 10°39'6.76"N 106°47'7.90"E At area nearby Cha River Bridge construction site
2 S2 10°39'9.57"N 106°45'42.97"E At ending point area of the package that is nearby Sac road.
Note: As required of Consultant (letter No. BLLT-J2/C5/SMC4-086 21st July 2015), location KK2 - nearly batching plan No.02 is required to relocate. The new location should be placed near the household who complained on noise pollution. After the survey, we selected a new location in the coordinates: 10°38'56.70"N, 106°45'56.50"E. The new location is approximately 150m from batching plant No. 2 to the West. This is the home of shrimp farmer. Here are some pictures of the new location:
Page 35
6.4.2 Results of environmental monitoring at Package J2
6.4.2.1 Air quality
The result of air quality at sampling locations is presented following:
a. Total suspended particles (TSP):
Results TSP concentrations between locations is shown in following:
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK1
Baseline 0.187 0.238 0.219 0.271 0.145 0.157 0.203 ± 0.044
April, 2015 0.194 0.257 0.249 0.245 0.167 0.148 0.210 ± 0.047
May, 2015 0.175 0.241 0.217 0.257 0.138 0.132 0.193 ± 0.053
June, 2015 0.175 0.257 0.236 0.263 0.101 0.112 0.191± 0.072
July, 2015 0.164 0.207 0.228 0.235 0.124 0.108 0.178± 0.054
August, 2015 0.182 0.239 0.204 0.227 0.251 0.103 0.201± 0.054
September, 2015
0.179 0.192 0.236 0.188 0.138 0.104 0.173± 0.046
KK2
Baseline 0.108 0.117 0.215 0.107 0.095 0.102 0.124 ± 0.041
April, 2015 0.147 0.163 0.186 0.112 0.098 0.085 0.132 ± 0.040
May, 2015 0.172 0.215 0.257 0.128 0.103 0.092 0.161 ± 0.066
June, 2015 0.112 0.155 0.237 0.121 0.115 0.084 0.137± 0.054
July, 2015 0.168 0.227 0.271 0.174 0.148 0.105 0.182± 0.059
August, 2015 (new location)
0.107 0.128 0.117 0.104 0.087 0.081 0.104 ± 0.018
September, 2015
0.089 0.107 0.118 0.119 0.073 0.057 0.094± 0.025
KK3 Baseline 0.114 0.104 0.143 0.097 0.085 0.078 0.104 ± 0.021
Page 36
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
April, 2015 0.086 0.129 0.112 0.107 0.076 0.081 0.099 ± 0.021
May, 2015 0.102 0.107 0.128 0.092 0.089 0.072 0.098 ± 0.019
June, 2015 0.107 0.132 0.116 0.122 0.081 0.085 0.107± 0.020
July, 2015 0.087 0.102 0.095 0.085 0.074 0.065 0.085± 0.020
August, 2015 0.084 0.113 0.127 0.091 0.065 0.068 0.091 ± 0.025
September, 2015
0.074 0.083 0.089 0.075 0.054 0.048 0.071± 0.016
QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average 1 hours
0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h.
Page 37
The changes of TSP at KK1 The changes of TSP at KK2
The changes of TSP at KK3 The changes of TSP at monitoring locations
Page 38
Remarks:
- Locations KK1: TSP fluctuates within 0.104 - 0.236 mg/m3. The highest value was at duration from
14 - 16h. The reason is that there are strong winds at this hot and dry duration. However, TSP is
still within the limited value (0.300 mg/m3) of QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average of 1h. Overall,
TSP is lower than one in previous months and baseline.
- Location KK2: TSP fluctuates within 0.057 - 0.119 mg/m3, these results are within the QCVN
05:2013/BTNMT. The same with August, results of household area in ROW nearly batching plant
and construction area are lower than one so much compare to the previous months and baseline.
That is show that, batching plant and construction activities do not cause significant impact to this
area.
- Location KK3: TSP fluctuates within 0.048 to 0.089 mg/m3, little fluctuations with times and is
much lower than the limited value of QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average of 1h. These values are
lower compare with baseline and the one previous month shows influences from disposal area to
the nearest population is negligible. Additionally, there is rainy season so dust content decrease
so much.
b. PM10:
Results PM10 concentrations between locations is shown in following:
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK1
Baseline 0.095 0.103 0.134 0.138 0.082 0.064 0.103 ± 0.026
April, 2015 0.107 0.125 0.116 0.134 0.082 0.076 0.107 ± 0.023
May, 2015 0.087 0.114 0.122 0.125 0.079 0.065 0.099 ± 0.025
June, 2015 0.087 0.124 0.107 0.142 0.063 0.056 0.097 ± 0.034
July, 2015 0.083 0.116 0.126 0.119 0.065 0.056 0.094± 0.030
August, 2015 0.104 0.128 0.117 0.125 0.143 0.052 0.112 ± 0.032
September, 2015
0.087 0.109 0.152 0.107 0.074 0.047 0.096± 0.036
KK2
Baseline 0.054 0.062 0.147 0.042 0.051 0.057 0.069 ± 0,035
April, 2015 0.075 0.105 0.122 0.057 0.053 0.046 0.076 ± 0.031
May, 2015 0.068 0.142 0.165 0.057 0.059 0.054 0.091 ± 0.049
June, 2015 0.067 0.082 0.172 0.082 0.057 0.044 0.084 ± 0.046
July, 2015 0.062 0.153 0.182 0.085 0.079 0.043 0.101± 0.055
August, 2015 0.034 0.049 0.038 0.041 0.035 0.033 0.038 ± 0.006
September, 2015
0.042 0.056 0.072 0.042 0.028 0.022 0.044± 0.018
Page 39
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK3
Baseline 0.046 0.051 0.054 0.043 0.036 0.034 0.044 ± 0.007
April, 2015 0.034 0.057 0.041 0.048 0.034 0.032 0.041 ± 0.009
May, 2015 0.044 0.056 0.062 0.047 0.043 0.035 0.048 ± 0.009
June, 2015 0.048 0.053 0.063 0.048 0.032 0.028 0.045 ± 0.012
July, 2015 0.036 0.058 0.049 0.039 0.032 0.032 0.041 ± 0.010
August, 2015 0.031 0.062 0.065 0.044 0.027 0.025 0.042 ± 0.016
September, 2015
0.032 0.047 0.051 0.038 0.031 0.027 0.038± 0.009
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality only have limit level
24h average for PM10.
Page 40
The changes of PM10 at KK1 The changes of PM10 at KK2
The changes of PM10 at KK3
Page 41
Remark:
There are shown that average values PM10 is highest at KK1 and (0.096 mg/m3), lowest value at KK3
(0.038 mg/m3). Location KK2 (new location) away from the site so PM10 concentrations is quite low,
much lower than at the old location (in the site) at all durations, respectively. However, dust values in
this month had decreased compare with baseline and previous months.
c. NO2, SO2, CO, CxHy:
Results NO2, SO2 and CO concentrations between locations are shown in Tables following:
Results of SO2 analysis at monitoring locations
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK1
Baseline 0.052 0.068 0.071 0.087 0.056 0.051 0,064 ± 0,013
June.2015 0.067 0.082 0.172 0.082 0.057 0.044 0.084 ± 0.046
Sep.2015 0.057 0.063 0.069 0.065 0.049 0.040 0.057± 0.011
KK2
Baseline 0.050 0.065 0.069 0.078 0.053 0.045 0.060 ± 0.013
June.2015 0.047 0.049 0.058 0.047 0.038 0.034 0.046 ± 0.009
Sep.2015 0.040 0.053 0.049 0.047 0.039 0.032 0.043± 0.008
KK3
Baseline 0.054 0.058 0.064 0.056 0.046 0.042 0.053 ± 0.008
June.2015 0.042 0.046 0.05 0.041 0.034 0.032 0.041 ± 0.007
Sep.2015 0.039 0.036 0.032 0.039 0.036 0.032 0.036± 0.003
QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average 1 hours
0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.350
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h.
Results of NO2 analysis at monitoring locations:
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK1
Baseline 0.044 0.056 0.065 0.071 0.043 0.044 0.054 ± 0.011
June, 2015 0.042 0.057 0.06 0.064 0.041 0.038 0.050 ± 0.011
Sep.2015 0.048 0.051 0.058 0.053 0.04 0.032 0.047± 0.009
KK2
Baseline 0.041 0.039 0.046 0.036 0.040 0.043 0.041 ± 0.003
June, 2015 0.047 0.049 0.058 0.047 0.038 0.034 0.046 ± 0.009
Sep.2015 0.031 0.042 0.038 0.045 0.032 0.026 0.036± 0.007
Page 42
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK3
Baseline 0.036 0.035 0.037 0.038 0.028 0.026 0.033 ± 0.005
June, 2015 0.035 0.039 0.042 0.034 0.023 0.021 0.032 ± 0.009
Sep.2015 0.035 0.029 0.023 0.035 0.029 0.023 0.029± 0.005
QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average 1 hours
0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h.
Results of CO analysis at monitoring locations:
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00-10:00
10:00-12:00
14:00-16:00
16:00-18:00
20:00-22:00
22:00-24:00
Average value
KK1
Baseline 1.87 2.16 1.38 1.36 2.85 3.19 2.14 ± 0.76
June, 2015 2.64 3.84 3.61 3.72 2.47 1.84 3.02 ± 0.82
Sep, 2015 3.06 3.47 3.75 2.85 2.04 1.29 2.74± 0.92
KK2
Baseline 1.07 1.29 1.54 1.42 1.51 1.26 1.35 ± 0.18
June, 2015 1.92 2.47 3.05 2.28 1.74 1.53 2.17 ± 0.55
Sep, 2015 1.25 2.86 2.01 1.95 1.04 0.893 1.67 ± 0.75
KK3
Baseline 1.18 1.33 1.58 1.29 1.04 1.12 1.26 ± 0.19
June, 2015 1.72 2.23 2.75 1.78 1.47 1.18 1.86 ± 0.56
Sep, 2015 1.24 1.18 1.07 1.24 1.18 1.07 1.16 ± 0.08
QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT – average 1 hours
30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Note: QCVN 05:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation on ambient air quality – Average of 1h.
Results of CxHy analysis at monitoring locations:
Location Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00- 10:00
10:00- 12:00
14:00- 16:00
16:00- 18:00
20:00- 22:00
22:00- 24:00
KK1
Baseline NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
June, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
Sep, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
KK2 Baseline NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
Page 43
Location Duration
Monitoring phase
08:00- 10:00
10:00- 12:00
14:00- 16:00
16:00- 18:00
20:00- 22:00
22:00- 24:00
June, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
Sep, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
KK3
Baseline NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
Sep, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
June, 2015 NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT
QCVN 06:2013/BTNMT – average 1 hours
5 5 5 5 5 5
Note: QCVN 06:2013/BTNMT: National technical regulation of some toxic substances on ambient air
quality – Average of 1h.
Remarks:
There show that the value of SO2, NO2, CO, CxHy at all locations are very low and reached to QCVN
05:2013/ BTNMT and QCVN 06:2009/ BTNMT (hourly average). The results showed that the air
quality in the area is very good.
Summary: All results are within the limits of QCVN 05:2013/ BTNMT (average 01 hours). Observing
figure 4.4, by location, there can easily find content of dust at KK1 still relatively high position (in the
gate of site) due to transport activities in and out the site. Two remaining positions (out site: residential
area near the package) are much lower than KK1. Contractor has arranged two car wash stations in
the area, so dust levels are maintained below the permitted levels of regulation.
6.4.2.2 Noise quality
The result of noise level at tested locations is presented following:
Results of noise level (dBA) at the monitoring locations (06-21h):
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
06:00-
08:00
08:00-
10:00
10:00-
12:00
12:00-
14:00
14:00-
16:00
16:00-
18:00
18:00-
20:00
20:00-
22:00
Average
KK1
Baseline 60.2 60.5 58.6 56.9 58.3 56.5 56.9 57.0 58.1
April, 2015 54.4 62.4 56.2 56.4 59.7 57.9 55.4 53.3 56.5
May, 2015 58.4 53.3 51.9 51.4 53.1 55.2 58.2 50.5 54.0
June, 2015 55.6 60.1 62.3 63.7 66.7 68.3 58.3 57.6 61.6
July, 2015 70.9 66.2 61.4 65.8 66.1 68.6 69.3 67.8 67.0
August, 2015
56.4 54.1 53.4 58.7 71.8 74.1 72 51.2 61.5
September, 2015
56.5 65.0 57.0 52.1 63.1 60.8 57.4 58.7 58.8
Page 44
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
06:00-
08:00
08:00-
10:00
10:00-
12:00
12:00-
14:00
14:00-
16:00
16:00-
18:00
18:00-
20:00
20:00-
22:00
Average
KK2
Baseline 64.4 61.4 59.6 47.6 64.8 56.5 64.7 62.9 60.2
April, 2015 57.8 64.4 62.4 58.8 63.2 61.1 64.3 62.2 62.0
May, 2015 64.3 62.2 56.3 64.8 63.4 64.7 66.5 64.4 63.3
June, 2015 55.9 54.4 55.7 62.6 58.5 59 57.4 76.1 60.0
July, 2015 60.1 55.9 59.5 58.1 55.6 62.9 61.5 68.2 60.2
August, 2015
60.4 59.7 58.6 59.5 58.7 55.6 55.2 55.7 57.9
September, 2015
59.9 61.4 56.7 59.0 60.1 61.2 52.9 48.1 57.4
KK3
Baseline 52.3 51.8 50.4 55.2 53.6 60.6 60.1 54.2 54.8
April, 2015 60.8 49.5 47.2 49.1 47.2 52.1 54.1 54 50.6
May, 2015 50.4 48.1 46.4 55.2 53 53.6 47.1 45.7 49.9
June, 2015 53.5 50.4 54.1 55.1 54.4 54.2 56.7 50.1 53.6
July, 2015 61 53.6 51.8 62.4 54.6 59.2 63.7 56.3 57.8
August, 2015
60.2 52.9 53.7 57.2 57.2 56.4 53.1 50.1 55.1
September, 2015
53.4 53.6 56.8 53.6 54.1 54.8 52.2 50.7 53.7
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT
70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70
Results of noise level (dBA) at the monitoring locations (21-06h):
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
22:00-24:00 24:00-02:00 02:00-04:00 04:00-06:00 Average
KK1
Baseline 49.1 41.8 44.5 49.9 46.3
April, 2015 50.9 50.4 48.5 55.2 51.3
May, 2015 51.5 50.3 50.6 50.9 50.8
June, 2015 41.4 42.5 49.5 51.3 46.2
July, 2015 63.9 66.8 69.9 61.2 65.5
August, 2015 48.8 47.8 53.5 57.9 52.0
September, 2015
56.7 47.7 47.2 46.1 49.4
KK2 Baseline 48.3 49.4 46.4 44.7 47.2
April, 2015 47.7 46.1 45.2 54.4 48.4
Page 45
Location
Duration
Monitoring phase
22:00-24:00 24:00-02:00 02:00-04:00 04:00-06:00 Average
May, 2015 59.3 57.5 46.3 64.1 56.8
June, 2015 65.3 72.8 58.9 57.5 63.6
July, 2015 63.3 51.9 57.7 57.2 57.5
August, 2015 56.2 55.8 56 59.4 56.9
September, 2015
46.7 46.0 44.5 62.8 50.0
KK3
Baseline 53.7 50.8 50.7 51.2 51.6
April, 2015 48.6 51.3 45.7 52.1 49.4
May, 2015 41.8 42.5 45.6 42.3 43.1
June, 2015 49.4 48.7 49.9 57.5 51.4
July, 2015 59.2 56.7 58.3 60.2 58.6
August, 2015 49.3 50.7 51.3 59.2 52.6
September, 2015
49.8 48.1 43.2 50.3 47.9
QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT 55 55 55 55 55
Note: QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on Noise – Noise levels apply to
common areas. KK2 had been changed (see more in section 2.1, table 2.1).
Package J2 Quarterly Environmental Management Report (Third quarter – Sep 2015)
Page 46
Results noise (Leq) at the monitoring location KK1
Results noise (Leq) at the monitoring location KK2
Package J2 Quarterly Environmental Management Report (Third quarter – Sep 2015)
Page 47
Results noise (Leq) at the monitoring location KK3
Package J2 Quarterly Environmental Management Report (Third quarter – Sep 2015)
Page 48
Remarks:
- KK1: Noise ranged from 51.1 – 65.0 dBA at daytime and 46.1 – 56.7 dBA at night (Fig 3.8). In
general, noise range at KK1 is lower significantly than the previous monitoring period; especially,
at night results has decreased very significantly. The most are fully reached QCVN 26:2010/
BTNMT (daytime: 70 dBA; night time: 55 dBA), only from 22-24h is small higher standard (56.7
dBA).
- KK2: Noise ranged from 48.1 – 61.4 dBA at daytime and 44.5 – 62.8 dBA at night. In general,
noise value is evenly all during monitoring time, and fully reached QCVN 26:2010/ BTNMT (70
dBA) at daytime. Noise levels at night are approximately standard limit (55 dBA); only on early
morning (04 - 06 am), many boats go on the Soai Rap river so noisy. The results showed that the
influence of the noise from the construction site to the nearest household is negligible.
- KK3: Compare to baseline and previous month, noise level at the daytime slight decreased, and
fell sharply at night. These results are lower than limit of QCVN 26:2010/ BTNMT.
In overall, at day and night times, noise values measured at KK1 (gate area) and KK3 (household near
Disposal No.1) significant decrease at night and the most of results are lower than allowable limits
(QCVN 26:2010/BTNMT – 55 dBA). The volume transport had decreased and bored pile works reach
90% of the volume so pressure transport excavated from the site was no longer as large as the
previous month.
6.4.2.3 Vibration
Results vibration at the monitoring locations shown in following Table:
Page 49
Vibration measurement results (dB) at the monitoring locations:
Location
Time 06:00- 08:00
08:00- 10:00
10:00- 12:00
12:00- 14:00
14:00- 16:00
16:00- 18:00
18:00- 20:00
20:00- 22:00
22:00- 24:00
24:00- 02:00
02:00- 04:00
04:00- 06:00
Average
KK1
Baseline 45.4 49.5 47.4 48.3 50.1 47.4 44.8 43.2 44.6 43.7 40.2 45.4 45.8
4. 2015 51.7 58.3 49.4 54.6 47.3 48.2 45.9 44.1 45.3 42.6 41.8 44.4 41.8
5. 2015 46.7 48.3 48.1 47.8 50.2 47.2 45.8 44.7 44.2 43.1 40.6 43.4 40.6
6. 2015 50.1 51.3 48.2 55.3 51.6 52.4 51.8 50.2 44.2 43.4 41.3 43.8 48.6
7. 2015 50.2 52.4 49.2 50.8 53.1 47.4 46.2 43.8 42.9 40.3 40.1 42.7 46.6
8. 2015 48.6 54.2 53.7 49.1 52.2 51.8 48.6 45.2 42.7 43.9 44.2 46.5 48.4
9.2015 47.4 48.6 45.7 46.1 48.3 46.9 45.4 41.7 42.8 40.6 41.4 46.3 45.1
KK2
Baseline 42.4 41.7 45.6 43.2 40.8 40.3 39.7 40.1 38.6 39.4 38.3 42.4 38.8
4. 2015 43.7 44.6 42.5 46.7 41.3 47.4 42.8 41.6 39.3 40.5 38.7 41.6 38.7
5. 2015 48.5 47.6 48.6 50.2 50.8 47.3 41.7 40.1 41.6 41.4 40.3 42.6 40.1
6. 2015 42.7 42.2 42 41.8 40.7 41.1 43.2 42.6 41.8 40.6 41.3 42.8 41.9
7. 2015 48.2 48.9 47.5 46.4 49.3 47.8 42.4 40.6 41.2 41.9 40.1 41.5 44.7
8. 2015 40.6 40.9 40.1 41.2 42.3 40.8 41.4 40.7 40.2 39.4 37.8 40.5 40.5
9.2015 43.7 46.2 44.9 42.5 44.1 41.8 40.3 39.7 37.6 41.2 39.5 43.6 42.1
KK3
Baseline 44.7 48.3 45.7 49.1 46.5 45.2 43.6 44.8 42.1 43.3 40.6 44.7 44.9
4. 2015 42.4 45.6 47.1 46.5 48.6 44.7 45.3 43.1 44.2 40.6 39.5 40.3 39.5
5. 2015 44.6 45.3 45.7 42.1 46.7 45.8 44.5 39.6 39.2 40.2 40.1 44.6 39.2
6. 2015 42.4 42.1 41.7 42.1 41.5 43.2 41.6 40.8 39.1 38.7 39.6 42.4 41.3
7. 2015 42.0 42.4 42.7 43 42.5 43.1 42.8 38.4 38.0 39.1 40.2 41.6 41.3
8. 2015 41.6 40.4 42.3 41 41.5 42.1 41.8 39.5 38.7 30.2 37.6 40.4 39.8
9.2015 45.2 50.1 46.4 51.3 47.8 48.5 45.3 43.7 43.4 42.5 41.3 45.1 45.9
QCVN 27:2010/BTNMT
75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Baselin
e Baselin
e Baselin
e Baselin
e Baselin
e
Page 50
Figure 4.20. Results of vibration level (L10) at the monitoring location KK1
Figure 4.21. Results of vibration level (L10) at the monitoring location KK2
Page 51
Figure 4.22. Results of vibration level (L10) at the monitoring location KK3
Remarks:
Measured results are much lower than QCVN 27: 2010/ BTNMT. Monitoring results show that the influence of vibration to the area nearly the package is very low.
6.4.2.4 Surface water quality
As suggested by Consultant, a surface water sample still had taken at river (Rach Dia) that is nearly Disposal No.02. The results of water quality testing are
presented following tables:
Result monitoring of surface water quality nearly package J2:
No Parameter Unit
Results QCVN
08:2008/BTNMT/B1 NM1 NM2 NM3 NM4
High tide Low tide High tide Low tide High tide Low tide High tide Low tide
1 pH - 6.04 6.16 6.45 6.63 6.76 6.73 6.56 6.48 5.5-9
2 Turbidity NTU 22.7 31.6 47.5 39.4 35.2 43.8 116 123 -
3 DO mg/L 4.96 5.13 4.57 4.91 4.87 5.09 4.53 4.72 ≥ 4
4 TSS mg/L 43 58 72 61 45 52 67 73 50
5 BOD5 mg/L 8 7 10 9 6 5 12 10 15
Page 52
No Parameter Unit
Results QCVN
08:2008/BTNMT/B1 NM1 NM2 NM3 NM4
High tide Low tide High tide Low tide High tide Low tide High tide Low tide
6 COD mg/L 15 13 19 17 11 9 23 19 30
7 NO2-(as N) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT 0.04
8 NO3-(as N) mg/L 1.12 1.04 1.76 2.25 2.01 1.82 0.737 0.557 10
9 PO43-(as P) mg/L 0.014 0.019 0.026 0.018 0.016 0.018 0.025 0.015 0.3
10 Zinc (Zn) mg/L 0.024 0.027 0.038 0.026 0.029 0.033 0.045 0.041 1.5
11 Iron (Fe) mg/L 0.221 0.415 0.893 0.372 0.632 0.468 0.293 0.772 1.5
12 Mangan (Mn) mg/L 0.023 0.037 0.046 0.034 0.046 0.037 0.051 0.044 -
13 Alumium (Al) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT -
14 Asen (As) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT 0.05
15 Lead (Pb) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT 0.05
16 Cadimi (Cd) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT 0.01
17 Crôm VI (Cr6+) mg/L NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT NDT 0.04
18 Oil & grease mg/L 0.08 NDT 0.07 NDT NDT NDT 0.08 NDT 0.1
19 Coliform MPN/100mL 110 70 230 93 140 94 170 110 7500
Note: - NDT: Not detected. TB: The average value;
- QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT: National technical Regulation on Surface Water Quality – B1 level: Water quality for irrigation, irrigation or other purposes with
requirements similar water quality
Page 53
Result monitoring of surface water quality at Rach Dia river:
No Parameter Unit
Results at NM (D2) QCVN 08:2008/BTN
MT/B1 July August September
1 pH - 8.07 6.72 6.86 5.5-9
2 Turbidity NTU 121 58.9 108 -
3 DO mg/L 4.26 4.71 4.81 ≥ 4
4 TSS mg/L 140 136 75 50
5 BOD5 mg/L 21 13 14 15
6 COD mg/L 38 22 27 30
7 NO2-(as N) mg/L 0.037 NDT NDT 0.04
8 NO3-(as N) mg/L 0.254 0.459 1.13 10
9 PO43-(as P) mg/L 0.048 0.031 0.026 0.3
10 Zinc (Zn) mg/L 0.067 0.046 0.038 1.5
11 Iron (Fe) mg/L 0.315 0.247 0.314 1.5
12 Mangan (Mn) mg/L 0.024 0.035 0.027 -
13 Alumium (Al) mg/L 0.031 0.026 NDT -
14 Asen (As) mg/L NDT NDT NDT 0.05
15 Lead (Pb) mg/L NDT NDT NDT 0.05
16 Cadimi (Cd) mg/L NDT NDT NDT 0.01
17 Crôm VI (Cr6+) mg/L NDT NDT NDT 0.04
18 Oil & grease mg/L 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.1
19 Coliform MPN/100mL 930 210 260 7500
Note: - NDT: Not detected. TB: The average value;
- QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT: National technical Regulation on Surface Water Quality – B1 level:
Water quality for irrigation, irrigation or other purposes with requirements similar water quality.
Remarks:
a. pH index
Evolutions of pH clearly demonstrated by the following figure:
Change of pH index at the monitoring locations
Through above Figure, it can be seen that fairly uniform of pH index between the monitoring locations,
there was not significant difference between high and low tide at the same location. All values are
within the permissible limits of QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT-B1.
Page 54
b. Total Suspended solids (TSS), turbidity:
Change of TSS clearly demonstrated by the following figure:
Change of TSS at the monitoring locations
TSS concentration is still high. All values at low tide exceed QCVN 08: 2008/BTNMT-B1. TSS and
turbidity at low tide are higher than one of the high tide at each location. Boats density in this region is
very large, has stirred flow leads to turbidity and TSS concentrations increase.
c. Assessment of organic pollution (DO, COD, BOD5 index)
Change of DO, COD, BOD5 index clearly demonstrated by the following figures:
Change of DO index at the monitoring locations
Page 55
Change of BOD5 index at the monitoring locations
Change of COD index at the monitoring locations
DO, BOD5 and COD index are used to denote the degree of organic pollution in the water, through the
figures of 4.25, 4.26, 4.27, and shows the surface water near the project area as follows:
- The average of monitoring locations ranged from 4.53 to 5.09 mg O2/L, completely achieved
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT-B1.
- The average of BOD5 ranged from 5 – 12 mg O2/l, completely reached the limit of QCVN
08:2008/BTNMT-B1.
- The COD also have similar characteristics BOD5, and meet QCVN 08: 2008/BTNMT-B1.
d. Assessment of nutrient pollution (NO2-, NO3
-, PO4
3-)
Change of NO2-, NO3
-, PO4
3- clearly demonstrated by the following figures:
Page 56
Change of NO3- at the monitoring locations
Change of PO43-
at the monitoring locations
Value of NO2-, NO3
-, PO4
3- are used to denote the degree of nutrient pollution in water, the results and
the morphological of graphs show that there are not absolutely surface water nutrient pollution signs
yet at here. The results of PO43-
are very low, below the permissible limit of QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT-
B1, even at A2. NO2- parameter that is an indicator to determine the trace contamination is completely
undetectable. NO3- values are higher than baseline and the previous months so still much lower than
QCVN 08:2008/BTNMT-B1. This creasing maybe natural elements, because NO3- value at NM(D2) is
the same although its location away from the project.
e. Heavy Metals
All heavy metal concentrations were lower than the permitted level of QCVN08: 2008/BTNMT-B1
many times. Indicators such as Fe, Al, As, Hg, Cd, Pb were not detected.
f. Oil and grease
Value analysis shows that water quality at areas potentially contaminated less level due to the
Page 57
influence of the busiest traffic activities in this area. However, values achieve QCVN 08: 2008/BTNMT-
B1.
g. Microbiology
Change of Coliform total at the monitoring locations
Overall, coliform values are much lower than QCVN08:2008/BTNMT-B1. The average values show
that there are not many differences between locations.
h. Remarks at the NM(D2): surface water on Rach Dia River nearly the Disposal No.2:
Overall, most values are much lower than QCVN08:2008/BTNMT-B1. Monitoring results showed not
yet significant changes in the physicochemical properties of water sources compared to the previous
monitoring period. The pH value is lower than the previous month due to sampling time (previous
month: high tide; this month: low tide). Solids suspended (TSS) in water measured at 75 mg/l, higher
than QCVN08: 2008/ BTNMT-B1 (50 mg/l). However, probably due to the rainy season and water
resource characteristics inherent in this area because excavated soil volume to disposal area No. 02 is
less than previous month.
6.4.2.5 Soil quality
The results of soil quality testing are presented in following Table:
Result monitoring of soil quality:
No.
Parameters Unit
Result
QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT
Đ1 Đ2
Base line
6.2015 9.2015 Base line
6.2015 9.2015
1 pH (KCl) - 3.22 3.47 3.06 3.51 3.38 3.51 -
2 Sulfat (SO42-)
g/kg 1.94 2.53 3.25 3.17 2.86 2.67 -
3 Iron (Fe) g/kg 2.25 1.74 2.14 1.31 1.52 1.93 -
4 Cupper (Cu) mg/kg 9.35 7.49 8.72 2.67 5.26 7.64 50
5 Zinc (Zn) mg/kg 58.4 47.1 53.7 63.3 52.8 58.1 200
Page 58
No.
Parameters Unit
Result
QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT
Đ1 Đ2
Base line
6.2015 9.2015 Base line
6.2015 9.2015
6 Asen (As) mg/kg 2.46 2.75 3.06 3.78 3.24 3.17 12
7 Cadimi (Cd) mg/kg NDT NDT 0.146 NDT NDT 0.092 2
8 Lead (Pb) mg/kg 17.3 18.6 24.5 15.7 16.3 15.8 70
Note: - NDT: Not detected.
- QCVN 03:2008/BTNMT: National technical Regulation on soil quality – Agricultural soil.
Comments:
The same with previous monitoring, the results showed that soil quality is very good when
concentrations are much lower than the allowable value of QCVN 03:2008/ BTNMT: National technical
Regulation on soil quality – Agricultural soil.
6.4.2.6 Emission
The results of monitoring of emissions at two concrete batching plants are presented in the following
table.
The results of monitoring of emissions:
No. Parameters Unit
Result NM QCVN 19:2009/
BTNMT/ Level B
E1 (KT1) E2 (KT2)
1 Dust mg/Nm3 104 97 -
2 SO2 mg/Nm3 <3 <3 -
3 NOx mg/Nm3 <3 <3 -
4 CO mg/Nm3 12.8 15.3 50
Note: QCVN 19: 2009/ BTNMT/ Level B: National Technical Regulation on industrial emissions for
dust.
Remarks:
The results showed that levels of dust and inorganic gas emissions are lower than the allowable value
of QCVN 19: 2009/BTNMT/Level B: National technical regulations on industrial emissions for dust.
6.4.2.7 Waste water
The results of monitoring of waste water are presented in the following tables.
The results of monitoring of domestic waste water:
No. Parameters Unit
Result QCVN 14:2008/ BTNMT NT1 NT4
1 pH - 8.23 7.58 5.5 – 9
2 Turbidity NTU 12.1 43.7 -
3 TSS mg/L 28 36 100
Page 59
No. Parameters Unit
Result QCVN 14:2008/ BTNMT NT1 NT4
4 BOD5 mg/L 15 21 50
5 Amoni (as N) mg/L 3.61 6.87 10
6 Oil total mg/L 1.74 3.52 -
7 Coliform MPN/100mL 11 x 102 930 5000
Note: QCVN 14: 2008/ BTNMT: National Technical Regulation on domestic wastewater.
The results of monitoring of waste water of batching plant
No. Parameters Unit
Result QCVN 40:2011/ BTNMT NT2 NT3
1 pH - 8.36 8.67 5.5 – 9
2 Turbidity NTU 9.32 57.6 -
3 TSS mg/L 31 65 150
4 BOD5 mg/L 26 42 50
5 Amoni (as N) mg/L 1.15 2.36 10
6 Oil total mg/L 0.47 0.58 -
7 Coliform MPN/100mL 23 170 5000
Note: QCVN 40: 2011/ BTNMT/ Level B: National Technical Regulation on industrial wastewater.
Remarks:
The results showed that contents of parameters are lower than the allowable value of QCVN 14:
2008/BTNMT and 40: 2011/BTNMT/Level B. Thus, the waste water was controlled well, the contractor
will continue to maintain the control measures to ensure the quality of waste water in accordance with
the current regulations.
7. KEY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The contractors lacking in many issues as far as Environmental safeguards of ADB and JICA are
concern. However there are few critical issues which should be comply by the contractor immediately.
1. All contractors from ADB section has not mobilized there Environmental Officer so far. Even
none of these contractors have not submitted the CV of their environmental officer in CSC
office for approval. The employment of full time Environmental officer is part contract
agreement with EPMU. It is clearly stated in Technical specification Volume-III, section
01300, and para 1.3 that “contractor shall appoint an Environmental Officer with
environmental/social qualifications who shall remain in place for the duration of the contract
period and be responsible for ensuring implementation of all the contractor’s responsibilities
regarding environmental issues” . However till now no action has been taken by any
contractor in this regard.
2. Also as per the contract agreement contractor shall submit the monthly environmental
progress report to CSC office for every month. So far no contractor has submitted the report
in CSC office. However contractor of JICA section is submitting this report in CSC office.
Page 60
3. All the contractors are procuring aggregates and sand from the local supplier of these
material as they have not borrowing these material from their own quarries. As per the
national legislation of environment the contractor may use this construction material from
those sources which has valid permission/ approval of Natural Resource and Environment
Department. The CSC has asked all them to submit the copy of valid permission/ approval
of Natural Resource and Environment Department, obtained by the owner of
aggregates/sand quarry. So far no one has submitted the documents in CSC office and
working without legal approval. However the CSC has issued then letter of warning and
instructions.
4. It is requirement of national law to obtain the approval certificate for machinery and vehicles
used for construction purpose. So far none of the contractor has submitted these certificates
in CSC office.
5. There is huge unsuitable soil which will be disposed at some locations already approved for
disposal of unsuitable material from Natural Resource and Environment Department.
However so far no contractor has submitted the complete documents of approval of
disposal site.
8. COMPLAINTS
The project area is located near many residential locations also the proposed alignment is passing through many agricultural fields and semi urban area. So far no complaints have been recorded for environmental issues. However there are complaints for resettlement & rehabilitation and land acquisition issues. Rredressedal of these complaints have been done. The complaints and how these complaints settled are given in Table 5.
Most of the complaints of affected households have been settled by the Executing Agency with the help of concerned people’s committee of province, district and commune. However, even after best efforts of the executing agency, there are still few cases of dispute and grievances, which are being redressed as on priority.
Table 5. Settlement of complaints
No. District The Issues and Redresssal status
1. Ben Luc District 01 HH (Nguyên Viêt Cương) are under disputes, the case was in the court and the land was paid to its owner in accordance to the Court decision, (only assets are being disputed now).
In addition, 28 tombs were found without owners during site clearance. Local authorities are preparing to remove within October, 2015.
2 Can Giuoc District Almost 93 % area of acquired area is paid, however, remaining few HHs and TL Shoes Company adjacent to HCMC are, disputed due to difference in compensation rates between 2 provinces.
3 Bình Chánh District:
Almost 86,24ha of land out of 123,14ha, about 70%, has been paid and handed over to contractor.
The major obstacles (between Km 16+600-16+900), which causing inconveniences, are the land of 3 affected persons, who are partly paid:
Mr. Doan Van Tu, C14/271, Village-3- Da Phuoc Commune, Binh Chanh District (2180 M2)
Mr. Thai Van That, Village-3- Da Phuoc Commune, Binh Chanh District (9679 M2)
Mr. Nguyen Van Ke, (4020.20 M2)
When approached by our Specialist, the affected person Mr. Doan Van Tu in C14-271-Village 3- Da Phuoc commune, Binh Chanh
Page 61
No. District The Issues and Redresssal status
district, Ho Chi Minh City, promised that he has allowed the Contractor to commence the work for service road and after receiving the rest (near 500 mil.VND) of compensation, he will hand over the rest (near 2000 m2) of compensated land within a week to facilitate the construction work;
The two others affected persons have, lodged grievances before compensation committee for additional compensation, as excess land and trees are falling within the corridor. The Compensation committee Binh Chanh District communicated that the documentation for additional compensation for households Thai Van That and Nguyen Van Ke in village 3, Da Phuoc commune, Binh Chanh district, Ho Chi Minh City; is under process and will be ready and submitted to the Binh Chanh district people Committee for approval, which may take at least 2 weeks’ time and after availability of fund they will be able to pay the compensation.
The remaining areas are of NH 1 and NH 50 intersections.
9. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The construction work is already in progress in four civil contact packages of ADB and one civil contract in JICA section. These contractors have mobilized construction machinery and manpower on site. The contractors are not fully understood the environmental safeguards required for project implementation. The main focus of all these contractors is to achieve the physical work progress. The mindset of contractor and workers is that they will care for environmental safeguards in those situations where there is no conflict with the physical progress of work. It will take some more time to prepare them mentally that if they will take care of environmental and social safeguards then only the physical progress can be achieve swiftly.
There is some statutory permission which has to be obtained by contractor without any further delay as there is already significant delay in obtaining these permissions.
The contractor has to seriously consider the issue of waste disposal, facilities in labour camps, electric hazard issues of batching plant, water treatment facility in batching plant. The locations of all batching plant is near river so contractor has to construct the fencing around the batching plant so that there should be no contamination of river water from waste water and solid waste generated in the batching plant.
Also the safety of labours and workers is very important so there should be training program of health safety and environmental awareness for all work forces at regular interval.
There should be training for divers also so that while driving the vehicles through residential areas and environmental sensitive area all drivers take care of noise and air pollution and disturbance to local communities.
Page 62
APPENDICES
1. Site Inspection / Monitoring Reports 2. Source and Ambient Monitoring Results (Laboratory Analysis) 3. Photographs 4. Location Map of Sampling Stations 5. Copies of Environmental Permits/Approvals 6. Filled-out Grievance Intake Forms 7. Minutes of meetings (as applicable) 8. Other relevant information/documents
APPENDIX 1
SITE INSPECTION / MONITORING REPORTS
APPENDIX 2
SOURCE AND AMBIENT MONITORING RESULTS (LABORATORY ANALYSIS)
APPENDIX 3
Photographs
THE PACKAGE A1:
Visiting Chairman of VEC Preliminary test pile Yard
Access Road Casting Yard for Super T Girder
Bedroom of workers Canteen
THE PACKAGE A2-1
Preliminary Test Pile
Canal Relocation Monthly Safety Training
THE PACKAGE A3:
Installation of Wooden Pile for BP Yard Casting Concrete Block for Static Load Test
Construction of Site Office Access Road
Batching Plant Construction Construction of Casting Yard for Super T
Girder
THE PACKAGE J2:
The site status
Concrete Pumping
Settling water pond from temporary
excavated soil areas
Structure construction: Pier
Current status at temporary road
The pollution control activities
Oil tanks covered and placed on concrete floor and oil waste area
Car washing station at the gate
Label of trash Batching plant with silo and cover cloth to
reduce dust
Oli spill Kit
Environmental Monitoring
Monitoring of noise, vibration and ambient air – KK1
Monitoring of noise, vibration and ambient air – KK2
APPENDIX 4
Location Map of Sampling Stations
LOCATION MAP OF SAMPLING STATIONS OF PACKAGE J2:
Discharge area No.01
- Capacity >100.000 m3
- Far 3.5 km from site
- Transport by dump truck
APPENDIX 5
Copies of Environmental Permits/Approvals
APPENDIX 6
Filled-out Grievance Intake Forms
APPENDIX 7
Minutes of meetings (as applicable)
APPENDIX 8
Other relevant information/documents