Environmental and Social Monitoring Report · has the required ECoPs and 33% have both EMP and ECoPs. Furthermore, there was full documentation of the signing of voluntary donation

1

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report

# Consolidated Semi-Annual Report 14 November 2018

Myanmar: Enhancing Rural Livelihoods and

Incomes Project

Prepared by the Department of Rural Development through the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation for the Government of Myanmar and the Asian Development Bank.

2

This environmental and social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

3

Environmental and Social Safeguard Monitoring Report

August 2016 to June 2018

JFPR 9174–MYA: Enhancing Rural Livelihood and Incomes Project

Prepared by Department of Rural Development through the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation

4

5

Contents

Executive Summary .................................................................................... 8

I. Introduction and Project Overview .................................................... 9

II. Compliance to Project Safeguards Frameworks ............................. 13

Environmental Safeguards ..................................................................... 13

Environmental Codes of Practices (ECoPs) ................................... 13

Environmental Management Plan .................................................. 14

Social Safeguards .................................................................................. 18

Voluntary Donation ......................................................................... 18

Ethnic Groups ................................................................................ 22

Construction Occupational Health and Safety ........................................ 23

III. Next Steps ..................................................................................... 23

IV. Responses on the Clarificatory Notes from the submitted Audit and Monitoring Reports ................................................................................... 24

Attachments .............................................................................................. 26

Attachment 1: Updated Safeguards Frameworks submitted February 2017 ....................................................................................................... 27

Attachment 2: Samples of Environmental Management Plans for Infra and Livelihood SPs ................................................................................ 35

Attachment 3: Project Forms PC-13 Safeguards Screening ................... 46

Attachment 4: Project Forms PC-15 Safeguards Screening ................... 56

Attachment 6: Filled-up PC Forms from the Field (Myanmar) ................. 61

List of Landowners for Voluntary Donations ........................................... 71

Annex ....................................................................................................... 72

List of Landowners for Voluntary Donations ........................................... 72

6

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(as of 15 June 2018)

Currency unit – Myanmar Kyats

MMK1.00 = $0.00073

$1.00 = MMK1,347.80

ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AP affected person/s

Cbank community bank

CBO community based organization

CDD community driven development

DRD Department of Rural Development

DMF Design and Monitoring Framework

EA Executing Agency

ERLIP Enhancing Rural Livelihoods and Incomes Project

FM financial management

GAR Grant Assistance Report

GIM Grant Implementation Manual

GIU Grant Implementation Unit

GMU Grant Management Unit

IA Implementing Agency

IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development

JFPR Japan Fund for Poverty Reduction

KPI key performance indicator

M&E monitoring and evaluation

MIC Main Implementation Consultant

MIS management information system

MLFRD Ministry of Livestock, Fisheries and Rural Development

MMK Myanmar Kyat

MSR multi-stakeholder review

NAG Network Activity Group

NCDDP National Community Driven Development Project

NGO non-government organization

7

OM operations manual

PRA participatory rural appraisal

SHG self-help group

SSP support service provider

SUT start up team

TOF training of facilitators

TOR terms of reference

TPIC Township Project Implementation Committee

TTF training of technical facilitators

VDC Village Development Committee

VDP Village Development Plan

VT village tract

VTDP Village Tract Development Plan

8

Executive Summary

The Project started with pilot activities in Ngaputaw and preparatory activities in the Bokpyin for Cycle 1. This happened even before the Management Implementation Consultant (MIC), Cardno Myanmar came on board and presented their Inception Report on the later part of 2016. The MIC, since the start of its engagement with the Department of Rural Development (DRD), then conducted a series of major activities to catch-up and make a headway on the project activity schedules.

This activity schedules included undertaking community facilitation, technical, social and environmental safeguards training for both project staffs, facilitators, and selected community volunteers. Review of project policies and enhancements of project systems were also introduced by the Consultants and came up with the expected results.

In terms of Project Safeguards policies, lessons noted in the pilot activities of Ngaputaw and Bokpyin were substantial for the Ywangan township which benefited from the experiences of the two other townships. This led Ywangan to come up with their own good/best practices in their sub-project implementations.

Further, compliance to both environmental and social safeguards requirement such as the Environmental Code of Practices (ECoPs) for all sub-project types and Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) for selected types of sub-project were reviewed during the monitoring and audit activities. Cumulatively, out of the total 370 sub-projects for both Cycle 1 and 2, 67% has the required ECoPs and 33% have both EMP and ECoPs.

Furthermore, there was full documentation of the signing of voluntary donation forms of privately-owned land donated in favor of the sub-project, which traversed the rural access such as identified water supplies, location of electrical posts for rural electrification, and one for the relocation of a market place in Ywangan. A total of 589 landowners executed voluntary donations for 99 various sub-projects both for Cycles 1 &2. There was no reported physical relocation as a result of these voluntary donations.

However, some provisions and guidance on the 5% ratio of land donation was sometimes overlooked due to the eagerness and excitement of community volunteers and their assigned field facilitators in the approval and implementation of community projects. Although it is understandable to occur particularly for rural access road and water supply types of sub-projects, this is considered as a lesson learned and will serve as the basis for the enhancement of the system in the succeeding cycles. Good/best practices were also noted during the conduct of audits to share with other townships and villages, if these are applicable to their cultural practices.

The next steps include a review of project documents for compliance, will be one of the activities of the DRD-GIU and MIC during the planning and approval stages for Cycle 3. Also, a follow through is needed on the agreements made during the township Multi-Stakeholders Review of each township and finally, a preparation of next report submission to ADB by end of December 2018 is vital.

9

I. Introduction and Project Overview

Project Number and Title JFPR 9174–MYA: Enhancing Rural Livelihood and Incomes Project

Safeguards Category Environment B

Involuntary Resettlement B

Indigenous People B

Reporting Period The report covers the summary of activities from the MIC Inception from Aug 2016 to June 2018 with the attached submitted monitoring and audit report as annexes

Key Project and sub-projects activities conducted

The following activities were carried during the monitoring period; September 2016-June 2018. Project level: � Review of available Cycle 1 sub-project documents.

Observations, comments and recommendations were provided on how to further improve the outputs. Results were also discussed to the DRD-GMU Technical staff and corresponding recommendations were carried out in the next activities. The suggestions were incorporated in the Revision of the Operations Manual of the Project and adopted in the Cycle 2.

� Refresher Course. After the Inception Report

Workshop, field visits were conducted in the townships of Bokpyin and Ngaputaw by the MIC Team and DRD-GMU Team respectively. Re-orientation on the Safeguards policies and project requirements along with the Project activities were provided to the Project Facilitators and DRD township technical staffs. Discussion on the results of documents review and recommendation on how to better improve the outputs were agreed. Likewise, samples were provided on the Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) for each type of sub-project which will involve such requirement.

✓ Series of Cycle 1 Training of Facilitators (TOF).

• Ywangan Township - Introduced “Environmental Awareness” session and clear understanding of the

10

ADB Safeguards Policies to all Facilitators and DRD township staffs during the training modules.

o TOF 1 - October 2016 o TOF 2 - November 2016 o TOF 3 - March 2017.

� Updated the Environmental Assessment & Review

Framework and Resettlement & Ethnic Groups Framework before the ADB Mission in Ngaputaw in 2017. Refer to Attachment 1.

� Series of Cycle 2 Training of Facilitators (TOF) for the

3 townships. Introduction of Project Management sessions and sharing of lessons learned from the implementation of Cycle 1 and the result of Thematic Audits as basis for enhancing the Project’s operational policies, manual and forms. Facilitation techniques were also provided to the townships Key Experts to encourage active engagement of stakeholders at the township, village track and village levels.

� TOF-1 August 2017 � TOF 2 October 2017 � TOF-3 December 2017

� Enhancement of the sub-project reporting system to

capture sub-projects basic data and safeguards information along Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and/or Environmental Code of Practices (ECoPs), together with the documents for the site acquisition, compliance, and the acquisition of sub-project sites.

� Cycle 3 Training of Facilitators-1 (TOF1). Emphasis

were provided on the enhancement of the system particularly in the identification and planning stages to minimize/eliminate observed gaps from Cycles 1 & 2. Introduction was also done on the use of useful technology such as Google Earth in the identification and preparation of appropriate sub-project technical designs. Likewise, the discussion was conducted on the required enhanced project forms and other specific activities needed to be prepared. There was also an agreement on the field monitoring technique to ensure compliance with the use of smiley stickers on project documents. Additional facilitation techniques were also provided on how to present the

11

technical design to the village members and how to connect the responses with the safeguards forms and requirements.

Environment:

✓ Conducted refresher course and provided sample of Environmental Management Plan for water supply sub-project and piggery for possible livelihood proposal. Attachment 2

✓ Review of project forms; PC- 13 Safeguards Screening, PC – 15 Environmental Management Plan, were conducted during the training modules. Attachment 3 & 4.

✓ Technical and Safeguards Audits For Cycle 1: To ensure quality assurance, the MIC spearheaded the conduct of Technical and Safeguards Audit. The objective of which was to make that policies and procedures were observed at the community level and identified good/best practices were documented and shared. Observed gaps were discussed with the township teams together with the recommendations. The observations of the audit in Ngaputaw and Bokpyin were utilized during the technical training in Ywangan as basis of lessons learned and adopting enhanced good practices.

o Ngaputaw and Bokpyin: November 28 -

December 15, 2016

o Ywangan - June 2017.

✓ Quality Assurance Review (QAR) for Cycle 2 in the three (3) townships. Developed database for Safeguards Audit and identified good field practices which were shared during the conduct of Cycle 3 training of facilitators. There were identified gaps and recommended suggestions to improve the townships performances;

o Ywangan -February - March 2018 o Bokpyin- February – March 2018 o Ngaputaw – February-March 2018

✓ Enhancement of project forms for Safeguards Screening, and Environmental Management Plan.

12

Social Safeguards:

✓ Conducted refresher course on the Project policies

✓ Review of project forms; PC- 14 Voluntary Donation Plan were conducted during the training. Attachment

5 � Conducted Technical and Safeguards Audits in cycles

1 & 2 and � Enhancement of project forms for Safeguards

Screening, and Voluntary Donation Form

13

II. Compliance to Project Safeguards Frameworks

1. This section will describe the Project processes and systems and will present the results of the activities conducted following the project documents; e.g., safeguards frameworks, operations manual and project policies, the following information and outputs are the basis of review and assessment.

Environmental Safeguards

2. Related to the Environmental Assessment and Review Framework (EARF), the sub-projects approved by the Township Planning and Implementation Committees (TPICs) and implemented by the community members were all part of the positive list. The principle of community decision-making was observed in the processes of project selection, approval and implementation. The Facilitators informed the community volunteers and religiously observed the negative list. The results were validated during the conduct of the audit and quality assurance review activity. Women were given equal opportunity to work during the construction stage and were given labor rates based from the townships’ prevailing daily rates, (e.g. 4,000-4,500 kyats in Ngaputaw, 4,000-5,000 kyats in Ywangan and 5,000-7,000 kyats in Bokpyin). No children below 15 years of age were employed during the construction stage. Considering the scope of the small-scale sub-projects, no significant adverse impact that will trigger for Category A was noted during the planning and monitoring activities.

Environmental Codes of Practices (ECoPs)

3. The Project adopted the available safeguards instrument within the department considering that a similar community driven-development Project is being implemented by another donor within the department. For consistency of the processes and monitoring activities, the Environmental Codes of Practices (ECoPs) was then adopted. The processes involved the screening of proposed sub-project using the Safeguards Screening Form (PC-Form 13). Once the screening is concluded and the villagers agreed on the sub-project type, the facilitators will assist the community members in preparing their ECoPs. The Facilitators will guide the volunteers following the Guidance Notes on Environmental Safeguards and the Use of the Environmental Codes of Practices (Chapter 3 of the Operations Manual, pp. 35-59).

Based on the Operations Manual, all proposed sub-projects are required to have an ECoPs. The document will provide simple guidance to community members on the specific activities to be undertaken for their identified sub-project.

The Guidance Notes provides a table for general environmental codes of practices and specific guides for sub-project category such as buildings, rural road access, rural water supply system, rural electrification and small-scale irrigation. So far, no irrigation sub-project was proposed up to the end of cycle 2. Based on the results of the sub-project monitoring and audit activity, no significant adverse environmental impact was observed.

14

Mitigation activities listed on the ECoPs were followed by the facilitators and community members should have the identified minor impact occurs. This was validated during the conduct of sub-project monitoring activity during implementation and audits after the sub-project completion.

Environmental Management Plan

4. The Project has designed simple tools for the community volunteers to understand and observe the project requirements. The Safeguards Screening Form PC-13 is used during the identification and planning stages of the Project implementation. Potential risks can be identified using the form and proposed mitigation are incorporated in the plan either as part of the infrastructure design or village activities listed on the Environmental Management Plan or in the Environmental Codes of Practices. The risk responses could either be in the pre-implementation stage, construction stage, or during the operations and maintenance activities.

The monitoring compliance are both conducted by the township and union level technical staffs. Project documents are reviewed by the members of the Township Project Implementation Committee (TPIC) using the Form PC-6, Final Review Form and proposed sub-projects are approved prior to the release of grant funds. During the construction stage, DRD staffs together with the village volunteers conduct the quality assurance review to ensure compliance.

During the conduct of the audit, review of documents - PC Form 15, Environmental Management Plan and/or Environmental Codes of Practices (ECoPs), at the village level and consultation with selected community volunteers involved in the sub-project implementation and sub-project inspection are conducted. Validation is also done on whether the identified potential impact had occurred and if the proposed mitigation were conducted by the village proponents. Results of the audit are then presented during the township Multi-Stakeholders Review (MSR) to share good practices together with the identified gaps and recommendations.

For the conduct of quality assurance review and/or safeguards audit, the Union level technical staffs targeted at least 50-80% of the completed sub-projects and the remaining sub-projects to be handled by the township level. In Cycle 1, more than fifty-percent (50%) of sub-projects were jointly audited by the DRD-GMU and the Management Implementation Consultant (MIC). The rest of the sub-projects were audited jointly by the DRD-GIU and Support Service Providers at the township level.

For Cycle 2, 100% of the completed sub-projects were targeted to be assessed jointly by the technical staff of the Union and that of township levels. The framework requires the PIU to conduct at least 10% of the randomly selected sub-projects annually for the Category C sub-projects. The PIU will conduct annual environmental monitoring for all category B sub-projects with participation from MOALI staff. This policy statement is being followed by the Project to all completed sub-projects every end of the cycle. Technical staffs from the Grant Management Unit (GMU), Grant Implementation Unit (GIU), SSP village representatives participated in the conduct of Audit and Quality Assurance Review

15

to validate compliance and document good practices for potential sharing to other villages and townships.

The following tables will show the compliance of the village communities with respect to the types of sub-project and the compliance at the township level. The township of Ywangan decided to have both ECoPs and EMP for all of their sub-projects under Cycle 2. The number increases for the EMP compliance along this action considering that even for sub-project types only requiring the ECoPs, villagers also prepared the EMPs.

Township

Number of SPs with ECoPs only

Number of SPs w/ both ECoPs &

EMPs

Total SPs with ECoPs and EMPs

Bokpyin 35 17 52

Ngaputaw 73 5 78

Ywangan 38 23 61

Total 146 45 191

Cycle 1 Sub-projects Types

Sub-project Type


Number of SPs w/

both ECoPs &

EMPs


Earthen and Gravel Road 41 3 44

Concrete Road & Wheel Track 20 20

Retaining Wall/ Culvert 7 7

Wheel Bridge/Slab Bridge 9 9

Jetty 6 6

Piped Water Supply & Tube Well

33 33

Ground Tank 10 10

Pond and Dug Well 21 21

School Building 18 18

Multi-Purpose Building 19 19

16

Solar Powered 1 1

On-Grid Electrification 3 3

Total 146 45 191

Percentage 76% 24% 100%

Township

Number of SPs with ECoPs

only

Number of SPs w/ both ECoPs & EMPs


Bokpyin 34 19 53

Ngaputaw 68 2 70

Ywangan 56 56

Total 102 77 179

Cycle 2 Sub-projects Types

Sub-project Type

Number of SPs with

ECoPs only

Number of SPs w/ both

ECoPs & EMPs


Earthen and Gravel Road 23 36 59

Concrete Road & Wheel Track 31 31

Retaining Wall/ Culvert 6 1 7

Pedestrian Bridge (Stilt) 5 5

Wheel Bridge/Slab Bridge 2 2 4

Jetty 2 3 5

Piped Water Supply & Tube Well

7 16 23

Ground Tank 1 1

Pond and Dug Well 5 5

School Building 7 4 11

Multi-Purpose Building 8 2 10

Health Clinic 1 1

17

Village Market 1 1

Solar Powered 1 1

On-Grid Electrification 4 11 15

Total 102 77 179

Percentage 57% 43% 100%

Township


Number of SPs w/ both ECoPs &

EMPs


Bokpyin 69 36 105

Ngaputaw 141 7 148

Ywangan 38 79 117

Total 248 122 370

percentage 67% 33% 100%

5. Observed Good Practices.

Cycles 1 & 2 Project documents, ECoPs and other technical documents are available in the VDSC level;

Provision of fish nets and/or plastic tarpaulins for the stockpiling of sand and gravel to minimize damages of flora in the area;

Washing of paint brush in a basin and proper disposal of paints away from bodies of water in one of the school buildings;

Installation of cross-drainage for road sections out of community contributions to allow proper flow of run-off water and minimize and/or avoid clogging of run-off water;

Noticeably, in Chaung Hpyar Su village, presence of dragonflies during construction of concrete jetty, manifested the non-disturbance of the biodiversity in the area despite the ongoing construction work along the riverbank. Minimal spillage of concrete mix in the river due to proper construction method;

Provision of improvised perimeter fence, warning signs and garbage baskets during the construction of concrete bridge and road in Ywangan;

18

Construction of protection works to avoid damages to the “Banyan Tree” near the concrete bridge. The tree is considered culturally and religiously important to locals.

Provision of concrete round culvert and plastic pipes in the Multi-Purpose Building serving as rain water collection tank for use in the provided toilet;

Provision of improvised protection works using local bamboo for the completed gravel roads. This will minimize soil erosion of the road shoulders.

6. Observed Gaps and Challenges.

Gaps and Challenges Recommendations/Actions Taken

Excessive excavation for the road widening of the proposed earth road in Bokpyin.

During the next training, technique in the preparation of road alignment and close monitoring of civil works were recommended.

In some visited villages garbage are not properly disposed.

It was recommended that the sub-project can be used to influence the villagers to practice proper waste disposal. In some island villages, it was also strongly suggested to avoid throwing garbage at sea.

The quality of the water pond might be at risk with the presence of dried shrubs which could cause presence of bacteria.

The community is enjoined to observe cleanliness of the sub-project area and their respective villages. Water quality testing was also recommended before the development of water sources for the succeeding cycles.

Social Safeguards

7. The Project is Category B for the Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous People policies. The framework of the Project suggests to combine the Involuntary Resettlement an Ethnic Group in the absence of the country safeguards system. Thus, Resettlement and Ethnic Group Framework (REGF) acts as guide for sub-project selection, screening and assessment of social impacts. The framework mentioned that resettlement plan using the REGF guidance will be prepared if there is physical or economic displacement of people in the sub-project area whether they are more or less than 200 people.

Voluntary Donation

19

For Voluntary Donation, the Project will allow community members who benefit from a sub-project to donate land and other private assets to the project without compensation if they agreed to do so. It is expected that most project impacts will be addressed through voluntary donation without any significant or long-term impact in livelihood. Specific guides include: a) the total size of the productive land owned by the affected owner is more than 300 square meters, b) the impact is less than 5% of the total productive assets owned by the said household and c) no one has to be physically relocated.

1. The tables below present the compliance on these guides from Cycles 1 & 2.

Cycle 1 Sub-projects

Township

Number

of

Approved

SPs

Number

of SPs

with

Voluntary

Donation

Approx.

Area of

Donated

SP Sites

(in

square

feet)

Total Area

Owned by

Donors

(in Square

Feet)

Percent

of

Donated

Land to

Total

Area

Number

of

Donors

Ave. Total

Area

Voluntarily

Donated

(in square

feet)

Average Total

Area Owned

by Donors

(in square

feet)

Remarks/SP

Types

Bokpyin 52 15 60,548 25,256,214 0.240% 16 3,784.25 1,578,513.38

9-water supply & 5-multi-purpose bldg, 1-school

Ngaputaw 78 9 366,697 17,402,220 2.107% 39 9,402.50 446,210.77 8-roads, 1 pond

Ywangan 61 28 60,815 19,197,974 0.317% 259 2,171.96 74,123.45

20-water supply,7-roads, 1-electricity

Total 191 52 488,060 61,856,408 0.789% 314

Note: Other sub-project sites, the community/villages owned the site +300 square meters= 3,229.17 square feet; productive area owned

Following the tasks on the Guidance Note on Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards and Voluntary Land and Assets Donation (Chapter 3 of the Operations Manual, pp. 61-75), Facilitators and community volunteers religiously followed the listed tasks. This resulted for identifying 314 willing landowners in Cycle 1 and 275 landowners in Cycle 2. Most of the voluntarily donated lands utilized for the sub-project sites did not exceed the required 300 square meters stated in the framework. Similarly, most of the donated lands did not exceed the 5% ration of donated lands vis a vis total owned land area of the landowners.

Cycle 2 Sub-Projects

20

Township

No. of

Approve

d Sub-

projects

Number of

SPs with

Voluntary

Donation

Approx.

Area of

Donated

SP Sites

(in square

feet)

Total Area

Owned by

Donors

(in Square

Feet)

Percent

of

Donated

Land to

Total

Area

No. of

Donor

Average

Total Area

Voluntarily

Donated (in

square feet)

Average

Total Area

Owned by

Donors

(in square

feet)

Remarks/ SP

Types

Bokpyin 53 11

139,619

15,149,000 0.922% 21

6,648.52

721,380.95

6-water supply & 1-roads

Ngaputaw 70 8

117,520

3,363,870 3.494% 26

4,520.01

129,379.62

2-Electricity, 1-MPB & 3-roads

Ywangan 56 28

145,812

67,181,568 0.217% 228

639.52

294,656.00

7-water supply,15-roads, 4-electrification, 1-market, 1-MPB

Total 179 47

402,951

85,694,438 0.470% 275

Note: Other sub-project sites, the community/villages owned the site +300 square meters= 3,229.17 square feet; productive area owned

List of individual Owners per Cycle and Township in Annex 1.

With the number of selected sub-projects sites, almost all of these are within the community owned and some traversed privately-owned property where landowners executed voluntary donation forms in favor of their community projects.

Cumulatively per cycle, the donated lands accounts only for 0.789% and 0.470% in Cycles 1 & 2 respectively. There were few donated lands that were overlooked on the 5% ratio of donated lands against the total landholding of the landowner. However, the types of sub-projects are rural road access for which the road alignment can’t be adjusted as it traversed on the landholdings of the same landowners. The lessons were basis for system enhancement on the succeeding cycles.

Samples of filled-up forms, attachment 6 will show that facilitators and landowners tried to follow the project policies of voluntarily donating parcel of their landholdings in favor of the community.

11. Areas of Concern during the initial stage of implementation.

Operational Concern Recommendations/Action Taken

Sub-projects were already selected and funded when MIC came on board. No clear system in-placed at that time.

Provided additional columns for Safeguards data on the Sub-projects Monthly Reports

21

Sub-projects such as road access traversed few land owners which exceeded the 5% ratio of donation to total owned landholdings. Road alignment and /or design can’t be avoided per facilitators information.

Advised to avoid and/or minimized this kind of event for the succeeding cycles of 2 & 3.

Few landowners during the audit have not yet received copies of their signed Donation Form.

Advised to have two-set of copies for the donation form and provided copies to the landowners after signing. For those that have not yet received copies, facilitators already provided copies to the said landowners.

For few road access sub-projects, the eagerness of the community members and the facilitators caused to overlooked the ratio of the donated land as it is within the road alignment.

Advised the facilitators to ensure policy compliance for the next cycles.

During audit review conducted, observed that in one village, 7 owners signed only in one donation form.

Advised the facilitators to secure individual copy of donation form for each land owner who made the voluntary donation for the sub-project site. Copy of the form distributed to the owners.

12. Observed Good Practices

Cycles 1 & 2 In sub-project sites where acquisition was made through voluntary donation, the prescribe form is available in the village level. Selected landowners who made the donation, confirmed

that the process was undertaken for the acquisition of the site.

In one village in Ywangan, the signing of the voluntary donation for the water supply sub-project between the owner and the village administrator was made in-front of the Monk.

This is one way of showing respect to their religion and ensuring that socio-cultural practices are observed.

In another village in Ywangan where the site is owned by the village, the administrator issued legal document with the

Myanmar and Revenue Stamp to signify their willingness to use the village owned site for their water supply sub-project. While this practice was recognized by the department, it was not recommended by DRD to become an operational policy.

22

Ethnic Groups

In the covered townships in different regions and state, various ethnic groups are living together in these rural villages. The following ethnic groups were identified:

Ngaputaw - Bamar, Kayin, Chin, Mon, Rakhine and Shan (Bamar and Kayin are the majority in terms of number of households in the villages)

Bokpyin - Bamar, Kayin, Shan/Thai, Pashue, Muslim, Salone, Mon, Rakhine, Naga and Chin (Bamar and Kayin are the majority ethnic groups in terms of number of HH)

Ywangan - Danu, Pa-o, Palaung, Shan, Taung Yoe and Bamar (Danu is the majority in terms on number of HH in the villages)

It is expected that ethnic minority group in the villages are represented during village meetings, other project activities and even in the membership of the VDCS sub-committees.

Similar to any community driven development approach Projects, the implementation processes always follow the consultation activity through village meetings from identification, selection, planning, execution and monitoring. In villages where there are few household not belonging to the same ethnic groups with the most number of households, a separate consultation activities are being held by the Facilitators. This is to ensure that most of the village members able to participate and able to know the purpose and activities of the Project.

In the planning stage, indigenous way of sub-project designs (e.g., multi-purpose buildings, access roads) are considered by the Technical Facilitators. Construction methods, at the most, were observed through the indigenous way with respect to ethnic groups present in the village. These were done through close consultations with the ethnic members, leaders and village officials. Village meeting minutes are kept by the Facilitators to capture the consultation agreements and actions undertaken.

So far, after the implementation of two-cycles, no complaint was received in relation to ethnic group participation and was validated during the conduct of audits and quality assurance review activities. During the Township Multi-Stakeholders Review (TMSR), village volunteers representing all ethnic groups in the villages and township gather to witness the results of the audits conducted and the lessons learned shared from other village members. This is also a venue for sharing their Project experiences in the various aspects of implementation. The results of these sharing are consolidated for presentation in the Union level Multi-Stakeholders Review. In Cycle 2, recognition of best practices was initiated by the GMU which add motivations to project staffs and community volunteers on the affirmation of their efforts and participation.

Similar to the Environmental Safeguards and Involuntary Resettlement Project processes, the villagers also observed the ERLIP Code of Conduct (Chapter 3 of the Operations Manual, pp.15-18) which encompasses the participation, transparency and accountability principles of a community-driven development project. Specific provisions for the ethnic groups are sections 2.1- observe the laws of the Republic Union of Myanmar; 2.3- ensure

23

women, the poor, minority groups, and religious groups present in the project locations, and villagers from remote and isolated hamlets, participate actively in and benefits from the Project; and section 2.6- respect local cultures and customary laws prevalent in the project locations - for the appropriate guidance of the Facilitators and community members.

Construction Occupational Health and Safety

2. At the start of Cycle 1 implementation in Ywangan, the Project encouraged the community volunteers that their workers for the sub-project should wear the minimum personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hat, hand gloves, face masks and rubber boots during the construction. Indeed, during the monitoring activities, both men and women workers were observed to wear the said PPEs.

3. It was also noted that both men and women were given the opportunity to work with paid

labor during sub-project construction stage. These ranges from 3500-5000 kyats per day in Ngaputaw, 4000-5000 kyats in Ywangan and 6000-8000 kyats per day in Bokpyin.

III. Next Steps

For Cycle 3 Activities to be conducted

Monitoring compliance of required safeguards documents during the identification and planning stages with the use of smiley icons. This will help the township teams particularly the Key Experts to organize the priority activities and provision of technical assistance to the technical facilitators and selected community volunteers. The technique will also help the auditors during audits to immediately identify the observed gaps during the review process.

Follow-up the compliance of agreements made during the Quality Assurance Review; specifically on the individual donation forms in identified villages.

Incorporate in the training designs for the succeeding Training of Facilitators (TOFs) additional inputs on Risk Management to further improve the knowledge and skills of the technical facilitators on safeguards aspects.

Provide guidance with technical facilitators to have a complete and common reporting format of data entries in the computer database

Preparation and submission of next Safeguards Report for the Second Semester of 2018 due on End of December 2018.

24

IV. Responses on the Clarificatory Notes from the submitted Audit and Monitoring Reports

Clarificatory Notes/Comments Responses/Actions

Need templates of form PC-14 (Myanmar and English Version)

See Attachment 5 for the forms

Need detailed data of voluntary donations from Cycle 1 & 2

See Annex 1. List of Landowners who made voluntary donations by sub-project both for Cycle 1 & 2.

Annual Social Audit will be carried out by the Non-Government Organization (NGO) supporting the DRD township offices

Can be done provided that the budget source for the participating NGOs will be clear and granted.

Final design for the Wen Kyun Retaining Wall

The final design was prepared after the approval of the Village Track of the proposal. TFs assisted the VDSC members and reviewed by the TPIC for approval.

If jetty collapsed because of detailed drawings.

The completed jetty from cycle 1 lacks some shop drawing details as the assigned TF was a newly graduate. However, as mentioned in the report, experienced worker for constructing Jetty in the area filled this gap during the construction stage. Explained in the succeeding trainings that detailed drawings are important to be part of the plans.

What is the corrective issue on the donation of 1 acre for water pond?

The ratio of donated land of U Nyi Nyi in Rakhine Kone Village is still within the policy ratio of 3.88%. Advised the facilitators to just inform the landowners to just limit the donated area for the sub-project. Revised donation now is only 16900 square feet.

4 confirmed, what about the 25 landowners who made voluntary donations.

The 4 landowners were present during the FGD during the audit and the others were

25

not available during the FGD to confirm. The list is provided in Annex 1.

Village market donated area is 16200 sq.feet while the market area is only 1296 sq. feet.

As mentioned in the report, the old market area is near the school campus. The community decided to have it transferred outside the village proper. So the area donated covers for the whole market place and not only the market building.

Only 1 villager name found in annex 5 instead of 2.

Kindly refer now to Annex 1. SP YNN-2-13 with two owners; U Mg Aye & U Than Htay

26

Attachments

Attachment 1 - Updated Frameworks submitted February 2017, REGF & EARF

Attachment 2 - Samples of Environmental Management Plans PC-Form 15

Attachment 3 - Project Forms PC-13 Safeguards Screening (English & Myanmar)

Attachment 4 - Project Forms PC-15 EMP (English & Myanmar)

Attachment 5 - Project Forms PC-14 Voluntary Donation (English & Myanmar)

Attachment 6 - Filled-up PC Forms from village level

27

Attachment 1: Updated Safeguards Frameworks submitted February 2017

Component of the EARF Comments / Updates Proposed Changes and

Enhancement

I. Introduction

Parag. 2

Geographical Scope

Magway and Mandalay regions are no longer included in the Project coverage.

Refer to the agreed revised project scope; 63 VTs instead of the target 96 VTs.

Refer to Table 1 below

Parag. 4

Infrastructure sub-project – open menu activities

List of sub-projects are similar to the types of sub-project eligible for funding in the Operations Manual (OM).

List will be enhanced in the revision of OM to cover the possible type of livelihood interventions

Parag.5

Size of bock grants of $27,000 per VT

Budget of $27,000 per VT was not adapted in the implementation.

Project adapted range of cost parameters based on the Village Track population; <3000 people = 20,000,000 kyats

3001 to 5000 = 40,000,000 kyats

5001 to 9000 = 60,000,000 kyats

>9000 = 120,000,000 kyats

Parag. 6

Implementation Arrangements

“Ministry of Livestock, Fisheries and Rural Development is the executing agency.”

The Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation is the executing agency and the Department of Rural Development is the implementing agency.

Replace this with Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation

Parag. 10

“Project will identify investments for all five regions/state..”

Now only three regions/state

Refer to Table 1

28

Parag. 11

“NGOs or firms will be recruited to mobilize communities.”

DRD engaged the services of NAG, EcoDev and IID for the 3 townships of Ngaputaw, Bokpyin, and Ywangan respectively.

Parag. 12

To cover a total of 96 village tracks in six townships.

The project only able to cover 3 townships with 63 village tracks.

Refer to Table 1

Parag. 16

Sub-projects Eligibility

List of sub-projects are similar to the types of sub-project eligible for funding in the Operations Manual (OM).

Similar for the Negative List of Sub-project

List will be enhanced in the revision of OM to cover the possible type of livelihood interventions

Parag. 18

“lack of completed applicable safeguards requirementT”

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Procedures was already approved dated 29 December 2015 as Notification No. 616/2015 and form part of Sec. 42 of Environmental Conservation Law.

The Grouping Matrix for the type of Project Investment will be mentioned in the revision of OM and the Matrix will form as annex/appendix for reference, particularly for the livelihood component.

Parag. 22

Screening of sub-projects using Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Attachment 1

The Project adopted Form PC-13 Safeguards Screening which is similar to the REA.

For the review and approval, Form PC-6, Final Sub-project Proposal Review, environmental safeguards aspect is part of the section for review following the Form PC-13.

For better appreciation of the project staffs and villagers, enhancement of the process to include environmental awareness will be incorporated in the training modules.

29

Parag 23.

“If the sub-project is classified as category B for environment, will prepare IEE.”

The identified and approved sub-projects were mostly classified as Category C.

Project adopts Myanmar Environment Code of Practices (ECoPs) for all sub-project types and prepared Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for sub-project type that requires.

For consistency of policy and system in DRD with regard to CDD type of Project, adopt the ECoPs and EMP considering the type of small-scaled sub-projects identified.

IEE will still be considered in case the scope as indicated in the approved EIA Procedures will be identified by the villagers.

Parag. 25 Implementation

“The PMU and PIUs are responsible for the overall implementation of safeguards measuresT”

The Project structure has Grant Management Unit (GMU) at the Union level and Grant Implementation Unit (GIU) at the Township level that oversee the implementation of the safeguards measures.

The GMU and GIU are the equivalent of PMU and PIUs.

After the completion of the sub-projects, Technical and Safeguards Audit are conducted to review the processes at the village level.

Adopt the current structures

30

Parag. 26-30

Monitoring and Reporting

The project adapted Form PC-9, Sub-project Monitoring Form.

The form covers the section on ECoPs/EMP compliance.

Joint GMU-GIUs audited 50% of completed sub-projects prior to the conduct of Township MSR. The remaining 50% will be completed after the MSR for the townships of Ngaputaw and Bokpyin.

The safeguards audit result was included on the December 2016 Report submission to ADB.

Developed Safeguards Audit Tool will be enhanced based on the result of the Cycle 1 audit. This will also be incorporated in the revised OM.

Parag. 32-36

Grievance Redress Mechanism

The project has developed Grievance Handling Mechanism.

The processes and reporting system was established at all levels of the Project.

From the feedback letters received from the grievance boxes at the village level, no environmental related issues were received.

Will be incorporated in the revised OM

Parag. 37

Staffing Requirement

International and National Specialists are currently on board from the Management Implementation Consultant (MIC). GMU and GIU staffs are designated as environmental safeguards focal person.

31

Table 1. ERLIP Coverage as of December 2016

State/Region Townships Number of Village

Tracts Number of

Villages Number of

Households Total Population

Ayeyarwady Ngaputaw 16/83 68/411 10,529/74,340 44,384/324,554

Taninthayi Bokpyin 19 100 11,094 56,035

Shan State Ywangan 28 125 16,710 77,010

Total 3 Townships 63 293 38,333 177,429

Resettlement and Ethnic Groups Framework (REGF) Updates

Component of the REGF Comments / Updates Proposed Changes and

Enhancement

I. Project Description

Parag. 3 Background

The number of target beneficiaries and Village Tracks is now reduced to 3

regions/states from the previous 4.

Refer to the agreed project scope; 63 VTs instead of the target 96 VTs.

Refer to Table 1 below.

Parag.3 Budget of $27,000 per VT was

not adopted in the implementation.

Project grant per village track given based on range of population.

Project adapted ranges of cost

parameter based on the Village Track population; <3000 people = 20,000,000 kyats

3001 to 5000 = 40,000,000 kyats

5001 to 9000 = 60,000,000 kyats

>9000 = 120,000,000 kyats

Parag. 9

Ethnic Group Participation

Similar procedures in the OM of ERLIP.

Municipality instead of township

Replace the word municipality with township.

Parag.12

Involuntary Resettlement

“project impact is expected to be minimal and will only be known when specific sub-projects are selected and designed. . .”

Based on the Cycle 1

implementation, this assumption remains valid as no adverse impact was

No changes

32

recorded during the implementation.

Parag. 13

Principles of IR

Involuntary Resettlement has not trigger in the sub-projects implementation in Cycle 1.

IR principles incorporated in the Operations Manual

Parag.14 Minor land acquisition or loss of assets cannot be ruled out in CDDT

Recognized the CDD concept on the acquisition of property

OM ensure the process of voluntary donation. OM for enhancement and section of acquisition will be provided.

Parag. 19

Voluntary Donation

Process was observed at the village level. Criteria are included on the PC Form 14

Project adapted the Form PC 14 for commonality of form within DRD.

Enhancement of the form in the revised OM

Parag. 20 Social Audits Annual Social audit; some landowners voluntarily donated parcel of their land with the prescribed PC Form duly filled-

up and signed

Safeguards Audit was conducted using an Audit Tool developed and for additional enhancement based on the result of the Cycle 1 audit.

II. Socio Economic features

Parag. 29-32 and 35

Shan North and Central Dry Zone were not covered by the project

Suggested to be deleted

III. Legal Frameworks

Parag. 42-59

List of Myanmar Laws; Include other laws if appropriate for social safeguards

IV. Beneficiaries and

Mitigation

V. Compensation

Parag. 62

MLFRD needs to be replaced by Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation;

Term NPMO, RPMO were used; this could be from other projects

Delete and replace with the ERLIP structure

Delete and replace the term with DRD

Compensation scheme is also presented in Entitlement matrix

form. Appendix 4

No Involuntary Resettlement

happen in Cycle 1. Some are

Cross-reference with the Appendix 4

33

Voluntary Donation. Most of the SP sites are community

owned.

VI. Participation of Women

Parag. 69

There are few villages with ethnic groups that practice their social and customary

practices.

Women provided an

opportunity to participate in the identification, planning and implementation of their development sub-projects.

Parag. 70 Secured copy of the Gender Action Plan. Updated and submitted to ADB

VII. Consultation and Disclosure

Parag. 71

MLFRD needs to be replaced in the whole document

Project documents and meetings invites are posted on the village bulletin boards.

All of the project documents at the village level are in Myanmar language

Parag. 75 Disclosure of the framework in ADB website

Updated framework to be posted in the DRD website

Parag. 77 Disclosure of the framework to

be posted in DSWD project website

Replace DSWD with ERLIP or DRD

website

VIII. Grievance Redress

Parag. 80

Process of the grievance mechanism is part of the

operations manual.

If there is a need to enhance the grievance mechanism for the EG and

women, incorporate in the OM revision

Parag. 82 Document committee or

structure that resolve grievance in EG areas;

To be mentioned on the revision of

the manual if there are other structures at the EG areas

IX. Implementation Arrangement

Parag. 84-85

MLFRD needs to be replaced

MIC is assisting the DRD on the capability building activities by preparing training design,

training on facilitation, etc.

Enhancements of the training design is currently developed for the next

cycle implementation.

X. Monitoring and Reporting Townships prepare and submit

regular reports on the social safeguards activities.

Closing activity includes audits such as technical, safeguards,

Consolidation of the townships and

union MSR results.

Technical, Safeguards, Financial and Social Audits will be incorporated in the OM enhancements/revision.

34

financial and social. Multi-Stakeholder Review are also

undertaken at the township and Union levels.

Provided ADB with the audit report.

Appendix 3 Voluntary Donation Sample Form

In parag. 19, it was mentioned as “productive land”, in the

form it is mentioned as residential land.

ERLIP has adapted Form PC 14 which covers the criteria suggested on the REGF.

On the Form PC 14, it is recommend to attach a simple Sketch Plan that

will indicate the size of the total lot area and indicating the area for donation. Likewise, label for the name of the adjacent owners should

be included on the sketch plan. Include the North orientation and few landmarks on the plan for ground reference during validation and audit. This will minimize possible

encroachment or overlap with other landholdings.

Will be incorporated on the revision of the OM.

Appendix 4 Entitlement Matrix For discussion during trainings

35

Attachment 2: Samples of Environmental Management Plans for Infra and

Livelihood SPs

Sample FORM PC 15: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

The completed form will be attached to the sub-project proposal. The EMP will be approved by the

DRD township engineer.

Notes: The sample is for Piggery sub-project;

1. Verify for the country limits for the preparation of an IEE Checklist (Number of Heads of the pig);

2. Intended to have a most environmentally and socially acceptable piggery location and design;

3. Aligned and compliant to the ERLIP-Livelihood Guidelines (to be issued soon)

Region / State: Ayeyarwady Region

Township: Ngaputaw

Village tract: Taw Gyi

Village: Taw Gyi

Sub-project Name: Breeding of Pig (less than 100 Heads)

Technical Facilitator: Daw Kay Thi Tun/ Daw Thu Zar Thin

Potential adverse

impact(s) Mitigation measure(s)

Monitoring

indicators

Responsibilities

Implementation

schedule

Cost

estimates

Pre-Construction Stage

1. Encroachment in

Protected Areas

Consider alternative

site or design VDSC Members Step 2; Planning

2. Damage to plants and

animals in forest area

Secure alternative site

or design

Secure special land

use permit

VDSC Members

TFs

Step 2 Village

Planning

3. Damage to adjacent or

nearby sites of Cultural

Heritage

Change of sites the

piggery location or

design to lessen

probability of damages

VDSC Members

TFs Step 2

36

4. Land Acquisition,

Right of Way (ROW)

conflict, resettlement

Consider alternative location with less or no

involuntary issues;

Secure Form PC-14

Voluntary Donation and signed by the owner/s

VDSC Members

TFs

Lot Owner/s

Step 2

5. Negative reactions

from the neighbors due

to lack of information

Conduct meetings with

the beneficiaries and

affected persons on the

project plans

VDSC Members

People Affected

by the Project

Step 2 & 3 Cost of

snacks/food

6. Increased employment

opportunity and

community income

Give preference for

hiring people possibly

affected by the

displacement

Identified

laborers;

VDSC and TF

Step 3, Sub-

project Planning

part of the

estimates

Construction Stage

1. Soil erosion due to

clearing and/or

excavation works for

the Pig Pens and

drainage

Designate area for

excavated materials;

Provide protection

works

Presence of

eroded areas;

occurrence of

landslides

Construction

workers

Step 4, Sub-

project

Implementation;

Month 1

Part of the

work items for

construction

2. Increased hazards at

construction sites (Pig

Pens)

Observe Occupational

Safety and Health

practices

Number of

accidents reported

VDSC Members

Tech. Facilitator Step 4; Month __

should form

part of the

construction

mehods and

costs for

Personal

Protective

Equipment

3. Poor monitoring that

can result to use of

sub-standard

construction materials

that could lead to

damage the structures

Regular supervision

and monitoring for the

conformance of

materials specifications

Presence of sub-

standard

materials;

Occurrence of

damage during

construction

VDSC Members

Tech. Facilitator Step 4; Month __

part of the

cost estimates

Post-Construction Stage (Operations and Maintenance)

1. Unsustain Piggery

Operation

Prepare and implement

an acceptable O&M

Plan;

Sustain regular

Number of O&M

validated reports

Piggery members

and/or group Step 5

37

monitoring and repair of

piggery structures

2. Generation of organic

wastes

Bio-waste can be

recycled as bio-gas;

absence of dung

smell

Piggery members

and/or group Step 5

3. Contamination of

nearby water source

due to improper

disposal of wastes

Pigpens fitted with

adequate concrete line

septic vaults

Occurrence of

water-borne

diseases

Piggery members

and/or group Step 5

part of the

design and

estimates

4. Unhappy neighbors

due to presence of

dung smell

Proper and regular

cleaning of Pig Pens

Number of

Grievance

received

VDSC, GSC Step 5 part of the

O&M plan




Notes: The sample is for Water Supply Sub-project; Bokpyin Visit

1. The sub-project is beyond ECoPs and will require EMP; Page 1, bullet 3

2. The scope of the Project will cover 5 villages with an estimated pipeline length of 5.00 miles (8.00kms) from a waterfalls as water source;

3. The Conservation and Water Resources and Rivers Law

a. The following expressions contained in this Law shall have the meanings given hereunder:

(a) Water resources mean all water sources above and underground within boundaries of rivers and creeks, banks and waterfronts. This expression also includes water resources that flow into rivers and creeks. However, the inland water is excluded;

4. Environmental Conservation Rules; Chapter XIII a. Nobody shall carry out any activity which can damage the ecosystem and the natural

environment which is affected due to such system, except for the permission of the

Ministry for the interests of the people.

5. Need to see the complete plans: how the water source will be collected and to be filtered (considering surface water source); what is the topography and terrain where the pipelines will pass; where is the location of the tanks and the communal faucets; presence of Cultural Heritage in the area, Natural Heritage area, and cultural monuments to be affected by the water sub-project.

38

Region / State: Thanintharyi Region

Township: Bokpyin

Village tract: Htaungkhamet

Village: Chaungkashat, Aukleik, Kalanchaung,

Thirimyaing

Sub-project Name: Pipe Water Supply, 5.00 Mile in length (from

Waterfall)

Technical Facilitator: Mo Mo Myint Oo/Myo Min Aung

Potential adverse impact(s) Mitigation measure(s)

Monitoring

indicators

Responsibilities

Implementation

schedule Cost estimates


1. Inadequate surface

water flow

downstream due to over-diversion at the WSS intake, resulting to disruption or deprivation

of other water uses downstream.

Base the WSS design and capacity on adequate historical and updated information

to correctly estimate the WSS water requirement and the range of discharge or

flow of the surface water source in varying seasons;

Integrate in the determination of water flows to be diverted the

downstream river water requirements

VDSC

Members

TFs , Designer

Step 2; Planning

Part of the

design

considerations

for Hydraulic

Analysis

2. Health hazards to community, due to

undetected toxic contaminants in the water source.

Conduct water sampling and testing to assess water quality to determine if

water is suited for a WSS and to establish baseline so that any future degradation

VDSC Members

Tech. Facilitator

Step 2 Village

Planning

Cost of water

testing

39

and public health threats can be

detected

3. Damage to flora

(plants) and

disturbance to fauna (animals) in forested upland WSS intake

area)

Consider alternative site or design to reduce effects on flora and fauna

VDSC Members

TFs Step 2

4. Land Acquisition, Right

of Way (ROW) conflict

along the pipeline route

or in constructing the

communal faucets and

reservoirs.

Consider alternative location with less or

no involuntary issues;

Secure Form PC-14

Voluntary Donation and signed by the owner/s

VDSC Members

CF/TFs

Lot Owner/s

Step 2

5. Damage to adjacent or

nearby sites of Cultural

Heritage/Natural

Heritage/Cultural

Monuments

Change of sites of the structures location or design to lessen

probability of damages

Number of

reports/

complaints

VDSC Members

CFs/TFs Step 2

6. Negative reactions from

the neighbors due to

lack of information.

Conduct meetings

with the beneficiaries and affected persons on the project plans

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

VDSC Members

CF/TFs, GSC Step 2

Construction Stage

1. Clearing of vegetation

and disturbance to

wildlife in the vicinity of a

forested upland WSS

area.

Good construction method;

Designation of area for excavated materials

TFs and workers

Step 4, Sub-

project

Implementation;

Month 1

part of

estimates

2. Damage to cultural property which may be

encountered during excavation for communal water box/faucet area and pipes

Relocate the location of the water reservoir/communal faucets and/or reroute the water pipeline if

needed

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

CFs

GSC

Step 4

Month __

3. Affect activities and

rights to land/water use

by the IPs, women and

other vulnerable groups.

Addressed by measures to prevent

soil erosion and water quality impacts.

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

Tech. Facilitators

Contractor

GSC

Step 4

Month __

meeting

cost

40

Prior consultation & coordination to minimize disruption of

daily domestic activities,

VDSC

4. Poor monitoring that can

result to use of sub-

standard construction

materials that could lead

to damage the

structures.

Regular supervision and monitoring for the conformance of materials

specifications.

Presence of

sub-standard

materials;

Occurrence of

damages during

constructions

Tech. Facilitators

Contractor

GSC

VDSC

Step 4

Month __

part of the

supervision

cost

5. Increased hazards at

construction sites.

Observe Occupational Safety

and Health practices.

Refer to other

mitigations listed on the ECoPs.

Number of

accidents

reported

VDSC

TFs

Contractor

workers

Step 4

Month __

should form

part of the

construction

mehods and

costs for

Personal

Protective

Equipment


1. Unsustain water supply

system at optimum

capacity due to some

structural and minor

damages

Prepare and implement the O&M

Plan.

Conduct periodic and

regular maintenance work along the pipe fittings, pipelines and cleaning of the reservoirs.

Number of

reports

% of cracks

/leaks reported

O&M Group

Water User’s

Community

Plumber

6 Months after

Completion

Year 1 after

completion

2. Low collection of water

user’s fee

Conduct of regular meetings among member user’s and

Collection

Report

O&M Group

Collector

Water User’s

Year 1 after

completion

41




Region / State: _______________ Region

Township: ________________

Village tract: ________________

Village: __________________________

Sub-project Name: Construction of _____ linear meters

Concrete/Wooden Bridge

Technical Facilitator: ____________________


Monitoring

indicators

Responsibilities

Implementation

schedule

Cost

estimates


Site Selection

and Planning

Stage:

1. Encroachment in Protected Areas/

natural/critical habitats (e.g. mangrove/forest ecosystems, coral reefs, & other

aquatic ecosystems)

Consider alternate site that will

conform with the local zoning of the township

VDSC

Members

TFs , Designer

Stage 2;

Planning

Part of the

design

considerat

ions for

Hydraulic

Analysis

42

Damage to flora (plants) and disturbance to

fauna (animals) and other critical habitats

Consider alternative site or design to

reduce effects on flora and fauna.

Secure permit with the local officials for the entry and survey activities

VDSC

Members

TFs

Stage 2

Land Acquisition,

Right of Way

(ROW), existing

structures and crop

damages

Consider alternative location with less or

no involuntary issues;

Secure Form PC-14 Voluntary Donation and signed by the owner/s

Validate the Easement limits;

Prepare compensation

package if Involuntary Resettlement in unavoidable.

Ensure proper consultation and

document proceedings

VDSC Members

CF/TFs

Lot Owner/s

Stage 2

Damage to

adjacent or nearby

sites of Cultural

Heritage/Natural

Heritage/Cultural

Monuments

Change of sites of the bridge location if possible or prepare

engineering design to lessen probability of damages

Number of

reports/

complaints

VDSC

Members

CFs/TFs

Stage 2

Negative reactions

from the neighbors

due to lack of

information.

Conduct meetings with the beneficiaries and affected persons on

the project plans and disseminate the management plan

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

VDSC Members

CF/TFs, GSC Stage 2

43

Unstable or disturbed slopes/ river banks may cause damage to road access

Include in the design appropriate slope

protection and stabilization measures

Possible illegal or unauthorized sourcing of raw/construction materials

Procure construction materials from

licensed suppliers or accredited by the township officials

Construction Stage

1. Soil erosion and

landslides due to

clearing and excavation

activities

Designation of spoil/ excess storage area for excavated materials.

Allow re-use of excavated materials

during filling/embankment activity.

TFs and

workers

Stage 4, Sub-

project

Implementation

; Month 1

part of

estimates

Removal of vegetation and disturbance of existing habitat or

wildlife (for forested area)

Secure permit for cutting trees;

Re-planting of trees to maintain

vegetation buffer of the area

Dust suspension

from spoils stockpiles, vehicle movement in unpaved roads & construction

works

Control or provide

speed limit to heavy equipment and vehicles to minimize road dust

44

Noise generation from heavy equipment and/or generator

Minimize night-time construction activity;

Schedule movement of heavy equipment

during non-peak hours of daytime vehicular traffic;

Provide housing for genset if the location is near residences

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

CFs

GSC

Stage 4

Month __

Increased river turbidity & siltation, causing inconvenience in community use of the

affected river water

Set up sediment traps along rivers and/or gabions along banks to filter out

eroded sediments;

Same measures

above for erosion control and slope stabilization

Number of

complaints

received by the

GSC

Tech.

Facilitators

Contractor

GSC/VDSC

Stage 4

Month __

meeting

cost

Oil & grease contamination of waterbodies due to poor equipment maintenance &

refuelling

Provide oil & grease traps in stilling ponds;

Provide ring canals around fuelling tanks/ motorpool/ maintenance areas;

Collect used oils in containers

Presence of oil

film on water

surface;

Number of

public

complaints

received

Tech.

Facilitators

Contractor

GSC

VDSC

Stage 4

Month __

part of

the

supervisio

n cost

Decreased public

access through the

construction area

Provide alternative or Detour access to allow continued passage of vehicles

and pedestrians

Number of

public

complaints

received

Tech.

Facilitators

Contractor

GSCVDSC

Stage 4

Month __

part of the

supervisio

n cost

45

Increased hazards

at construction

sites.

Observe Occupational Safety

and Health practices.

Refer to other mitigations listed on the ECoPs.

Number of

accidents

reported

VDSC

TFs

Contractor

workers

Stage 4

Month __

should

form part

of the

constructi

on

mehods

and costs

for

Personal

Protective

Equipment


1. Unsustained bridge and road operations at optimum capacity due to

structural damages;

Prepare and implement the O&M Plan.;

Conduct periodic and regular

maintenance work along the bridge structures;

Provide appropriate load limit sign at FMR approach to lessen/prevent

passing of overloaded vehicles

Number of

reports

% of cracks

reported

O&M Group

Road and

Bridge Users

Community

members

6 Months after

Completion

Year 1 after

completion

Debris

collection

at the cost

of the

local

group/ass

n

Obstruction of

water flow and

aggregation of

garbage upstream

of the bridge

Regular removal of debris, logs and other materials upstream of the bridge that may

obstruct water flow or form a dam

Occurence of

garbage at the

upstream part

of the bridge;

O&M Group

Road and

Bridge Users

As may arises,

better before

typhoon occur

46

Attachment 3: Project Forms PC-13 Safeguards Screening

FORM PC 13: SAFEGUARDS SCREENING

The completed form (one is required for each subproject) is to be attached to the sub-project proposal.

Region / State :

Township:

Village Tract:

Village:

Sub-project Name:

Sub-project ID:

Sub-project description

Type (see eligible category)

Category (check one): Rehab Extension New work Other

Scope:

⧠ Building ⧠ Road/bridge/jetty ⧠ Water supply ⧠ Rural electrification ⧠ Irrigation

⧠ Sanitation ⧠ Livelihoods (specify) ⧠ Other (specify):

Cost estimate

Location (with GPS longitudes and latitudes, if available)

Beneficiaries

Number of villages served

Linked to sector plan? (Check one) Yes No

Any other similar sub-project/assistance in the same village? (Check one) Yes No

Environmental screening

Apply ECoP to all village sub-projects (VSP)

E1. Natural environment

(a) Briefly describe the vegetation/trees in/adjacent to the sub-project area

(b) Estimate and indicate where vegetation/trees might need to be cleared

47

(c) Are there any environmentally sensitive areas or threatened species (specify below) that could be

adversely affected by the sub-project?

-- Natural forests: Yes___ No___

-- National parks: Yes___ No___

-- Rivers: Yes___ No___

-- Lakes: Yes___ No___

-- Wetlands (swamps, polder areas, seasonally inundated areas): Yes___ No___

-- Habitats of endangered species for which protection is required under Myanmar laws and/or

international agreements: Yes___ No___

-- Others (describe): Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on the natural environment:

⧠ has an impact ⧠ No impact

E2. River ecology

Is there a possibility that, due to installation of structures, such as weirs and other irrigation structures,

the river ecology will be adversely affected? Attention should be paid to water quality and quantity; the

nature, productivity and use of aquatic habitats, and variations of these over time. Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on river ecology:

⧠ Has an impact ⧠ No impact

E3. Protected areas

Does the sub-project area (or components of the sub-project) occur within/adjacent to any protected

areas designated by government (national park, national reserve, world heritage site, etc.) Yes___

No___

If the sub-project is outside of, but close to, any protected area, is it likely to adversely affect the ecology

within the protected area areas (e.g., interference with the migration routes of mammals or birds)

Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on the protected areas:


E4. Geology and soils

48

Based upon visual inspection or available literature, are there areas of possible geologic or soil instability

(erosion prone, landslide prone, subsidence-prone)? Yes___ No___

Based upon visual inspection or available literature, are there areas that have risks of large scale

increase in soil leaching and/or erosion? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on geology and soils:


E5. Pollution

Will the sub-project lead to ground, water or air pollution? Yes___ No___

Will lead batteries be used? Yes_ No_

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on air pollution:


E6. Invasive plant species along feeder road routes

Is the sub-project likely to result in the spread of invasive plant species (along feeder road routes)?

Yes___ No___

E7. Endangered species along feeder road routes

Is the sub-project likely to result in an increased threat to endangered animal species(along feeder road

routes)? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on invasive plant species


E8. Historical, archaeological or cultural heritage site

Based on available sources, consultation with local authorities, local knowledge and/or observations,

could the sub-project alter any historical, archaeological or cultural heritage site (pagodas, memorials

and graves) or require excavation near same? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on historical, archaeological

or cultural heritage site:


E9. Loss of crops, fruit trees and household infrastructure

Will the sub-project result in the permanent or temporary loss of crops, fruit trees and household infra-

structure (such as granaries, outside toilets and kitchens, etc)? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on crops, fruit trees and

household infrastructure:


49

E10. Adverse impacts on natural habitats

Will the sub-project have adverse impacts on Natural Habitats that will not have acceptable mitigation

measures according to OP 4.04 Natural Habitats? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as having an impact on natural habitats:


E11. Solid or liquid waste

Will the sub-project generate solid or liquid wastes? Yes___ No___

If "Yes", does the sub-project include a plan for their adequate collection and disposal? Yes___ No___

If answer to any of above questions is ‘yes’, mark VSP as generating solid or liquid waste:


� If the answer to any of the above questions is ‘yes’, prepare an Environmental Management Plan

that contains suitable mitigation measures

Social screening

S1. Resettlement and/or land acquisition

Will land that is privately used for farming, residence, grazing or other purposes be permanently

acquired or temporarily occupied by sub-project implementation? Yes___ No___

� If the answer is ‘yes’, proceed to the guidance on land acquisition (voluntary donation or

resettlement plan, as appropriate)

S2. Accessing sub-project benefits

Will the following groups in the village have access to and benefit from the sub-project?

-- Women: Yes___ No___

-- Youth groups: Yes___ No___

-- Ethnic minorities: Yes___ No___

-- Religious minorities: Yes___ No___

-- Other groups (e.g. the poor, the elderly) Yes___ No___

� For each group: if the answer is ‘yes’, specify how it will benefit, and if it is ‘no’, explain why they

will not benefit.

Will villagers be employed for the implementation of works? Yes___ No___

� If the answer is ‘yes’, ® Part I, Block Grants to determine the daily wage

50

ပစ - စ - ၁၃ - အကာအကြယ စစေဆးခက ပစ

ျဖညသြငးၿပး ပစက (စမကနး လပငနးခြ တစခစ) စမကနး လပငနးခြ အဆျပလႊာတြင တြပါ။

တငးေဒသႀကး/ျပညနယ

ၿမ႕နယ

ေကးရြာအပစ

ေကးရြာ

စမကနး လပငနးခြ

စမကနး လပငနးခြ အမတ

စမကနးလပငနးခြအေၾကာငး

အမးအစား (အကးဝငမႈ အမးအစားတြင ၾကညပါ)

စမကနး အမးအစား (အမနျခစပါ) ျပငျခငး တးခ႕ျခငး အသစ အျခား

အေျခခ အေဆာကအအ အမးအစား

အေဆာကအအ လမး/တတား/ဆပခ ေရေပးေရး ေကးလကလပစစမး စကပးေရ

ကနးမာသန႔ရငးေရး ⧠ သကေမြး၀မးေၾကာငးလပငနးမား (သတမတပါ) ⧠ အျခား (သတမတပါ):

ခန႔မနးကနကေငြ

တညေနရာ (GPS reading ရႏငပါက ေဖာျပရန)

အကးျပ ဥးေရ

အကးျပ ေကးရြာေပါငး

က႑အလက စမကနး ႏင ဆကစပမႈ (ေရြးပါ) ရ မရ

51

ေကးရြာတြင အလားတ စမကနး လပငနးခြ/ ပစတ ပစၥညး (ေရြးပါ) ရ မရ

သဘာဝပတဝနးကငဆငရာ စစစမႈ

ေကးရြာစမကနးလပငနးခြမား အားလးအတြက သဘာဝပတဝနးကငဆငရာ ကငဝတ သကေရာကမႈ

E1. သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင Natural environment

(က) စမကနးလပငနးခြဧရယာအနးရ သစပငမား၏ အေျခအေန အနညးငယ ေဖာျပပါ။

(ခ) ရငးလငးရမည သစပင အေရအတြက ခန႔မနးပါ။

(ဂ) စမကနး လပငနးခြမ သကေရာကမႈရမညေနရာတြင သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကငႏင မးသဥးေတာမည တရစၦာန မးစတမား

တညရပါက ဆးရြားစြာ ထခကႏငေျခ စစေဆးပါ။

-- သဘာဝ သစေတာ ရ___ မရ___

-- အမးသားဥယာဥ ရ___ မရ___

-- ျမစ ရ___ မရ___

-- ကန ရ___ မရ___

-- ေရနကကြငး၊ စမေျမ၊ ရာသအလက ေရလႊမးမးမႈရေသာေျမမား ရ___ မရ___

-- ဥပေဒစညးမဥးမား၊ သေဘာတညမႈမားအရ မးသဥးေတာမညတရစၦာနမးစတမား၏ စားကကေျမ ရ___

မရ___

-- အျခား ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟေျဖပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသား ျပပါ

⧠ထခကမႈရ ⧠ထခကမႈမရ

E2. ျမစေခာငးမား၏ ေဂဟေဗဒ (River ecology)

52

ေရထမး တမ၊ ေရလႊ စေသာ ဆညေျမာငးဆငရာ အေဆာကအအ အသစမား ေဆာကလပမႈေၾကာင ျမစေခာငးမား၏

ေဂဟေဗဒက ထခကေစႏငမႈ ရမရ စစစပါ။ ေရ၏ အရညအေသြးေရာပမာဏပါ သတျပရန လပါသည၊ သဘာဝ၊

စးပြားျဖစ တြကေျခကကမႈႏင ေရေနသတဝါမားအတြကပါ ထညသြငး စဥးစားရန လသည။ ရ___ မရ___

တစခခ ရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတ အသား ျပပါ


E3. ကာကြယထားေသာဧရယာ (Protected areas)

စမကနး လပငနးခြဧရယာ (သ႔မဟတ စမကနး လပငနးခြ အစတအပငး) သည ကာကြယထားေသာ ဧရယာ (အမးသား

ဥယာဥ၊ အမးသား ကာကြယေတာ၊ ကမၻာအေမြအႏစ စသည)ႏင ထစပ /ကေရာကေနမႈ ရ___ မရ___

စမကနးလပငနးခြသည ဧရယာအတြငး မကေရာကေသာလညး နးကပေနၿပး သကေရာကမႈေၾကာင ေဂဟေဗဒအရ

ထခကႏငေျခ(ဥပမာ၊ ႏ႔တကသတဝါမား၊ ငကမား၏ ဝငထြကလမးေပၚ ကေရာကေနမႈ) ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသား ျပပါ။


E4. ဂအလဂ ႏင ေျမဆလႊာ (Geology and soils)

စစေဆး ေတြ႕ရခကသ႔မဟတ စာအပစာတမးမားအရ ဂအလဂႏင ေျမလႊာ တညၿငမမႈ မရျခငး (ေျမလႊာ

တကစားျခငး၊ ေျမၿပျခငး၊ subsidence-prone) ရ___ မရ___

စစေဆး ေတြ႕ရခကသ႔မဟတ စာအပစာတမးမားအရ ႀကးႀကးမားမား ေျမဆလႊာတကစားျခငး ရ___ မရ___

တစခခ ရသည ဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသားျပပါ။


E5. ညစညမးမႈ Pollution

စမကနးလပငနးခြေၾကာင ေျမ၊ ေရ၊ ေလထ ညစညမးမႈ ျဖစေစႏငျခငး ရ___ မရ___

53

ခ အသးျပေသာ ဘကထရမား အသးျပမႈ ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကငထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသားျပပါ


E6. လမးေဖာကလပမႈေၾကာင သစပငမးစတမားက အေႏာငအယကျဖစေစျခငး (Invasive plant species along

feeder road routes)

စမကနးလပငနးခြသည လမးေဖာကလပမႈေၾကာင သစပငမးစတမားက အေႏာငအယကျဖစေစျခငး ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသားျပပါ


E7. လမးေဖာကလပမႈေၾကာင မးစတမားက အႏရာယ ျဖစေစျခငး (Endangered species along feeder road

routes)

စမကနးလပငနးခြသည လမးေဖာကလပမႈေၾကာင ဇ၀သကရမးစတမားက အေႏာငအယကျဖစေစျခငး ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသား ျပပါ

ထခကမႈမရ

E8. သမငးဝင၊ ေရးေဟာငး၊ ယဥေကးမႈ ဧရယာ (Historical, archaeological or cultural heritage site)

ရရေသာ အခကအလကမားအရ၊ ေဒသအာဏာပငမား၏ အၾကေပးမႈအရ၊ ေဒသခမား၏ သရမႈအရ၊ ေလလာမႈ အရ

စမကနးလပငနးခြသည သမငးဝင၊ ေရးေဟာငး၊ ယဥေကးမႈ ဧရယာ (ဥပမာ ဘရားေစတ၊ အမတရ ေအာကေမဖြယ

အေဆာကအအႏင သခႋငးဂမား) သ႔မဟတ အနးနားတြင တးေဖာရန လအပမႈ ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသား ျပပါ


E9. သးႏ၊ အပငႏင ေနအမအေဆာကအအပကစးမႈ (Loss of crops, fruit trees and household infrastructure)

စမကနး လပငနးခြေၾကာင သးႏ၊ အပငႏင ေနအမအေဆာကအအ (ဥပမာ၊ က၊ က စေသာ သေလာင႐မား၊ အမျပငပရ

အမသာ၊ မးဖေခာင စသည) ပကစးမႈ ရ___ မရ___

54

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသားျပပါ။


E10. သဘာဝ သတဝါမား၏ စားကကေျမအေပၚ ဆးရြားစြာ သကေရာကမႈ(Adverse impacts on natural habitats)

စမကနး လပငနးခြေၾကာင သဘာဝသတဝါမားအေပၚ (OP 4.04 Natural Habitats) လကခႏငေသာ ပမာဏထက

ပလြန၍ ဆးရြားစြာ သကေရာကမႈ ရ___ မရ___

တစခခရသညဟ ေျဖပါက သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတ အသား ျပပါ


E11. ေရဆးႏင အမႈက (Solid or liquid waste)

စမကနး လပငနးခြေၾကာင ေရဆးႏင အမႈကထြကရမႈ ရ___ မရ___

ရပါက စမကနး လပငနးခြတြင လေလာကေသာ စြန႔ပစစနစ ပါဝငမႈ ရ___ မရ___

တစခခ ရသညဟေျဖပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကင ထခကမႈ ရႏငေၾကာငး VSP အမတအသား ျပပါ


အထကပါေမးခြနးတစခ၏ အေျဖသည “ရ” ဟ ျဖစပါက သဘာဝပတဝနးကင စမခန႔ခြမႈ အစအစဥ

(Environmental Management Plan) က ေရးဆြ၍ သကေရာကမႈအေပၚ ခႏငရည ရေစေရး ျပငဆငရမည။

လမႈ စစေဆးခက (Social screening)

S1. ျပနလည ေနရာခထားျခငးႏင ေျမသမးျခငး (Resettlement and/or land acquisition)

စမကနး လပငနးခြ အေကာငအထညေဖာရန ပဂၢလကပင ေျမ၊ အမရာ၊ စကခငး၊ သ႔မဟတ အျခား ပငဆငမႈမားက

အျမတမး သ႔မဟတ ယာယ အသးျပရန လအပမႈ ရ___ မရ___

အေျဖသည “ရ” ျဖစပါက ေျမသမးဆညးမႈ လမးၫႊနအတငး (ေျမလဒါနးျခငး သ႔မဟတ ေရႊ႕ေျပာငးေရး

အစအစဥတ႔က လအပသလ အသးျပ၍) ဆကလက ေဆာငရြကပါ။

55

S2. စမကနး လပငနးခြ၏ အကးသကေရာကမႈ ဆနးစစျခငး (Accessing benefits)

ေကးရြာတြငးရေအာကပါအပစမားသည စမကနး လပငနးခြ၏ အကးက ခစားရရျခငး

-- အမးသမးမား အကးခစားရရျခငး ရ___ မရ___

-- လငယမား အကးခစားရရျခငး ရ___ မရ___

-- တငးရငးသား လနညးစ အကး ခစားရရျခငး ရ___ မရ___

-- ဘာသာေရးအရ လနညးစ အကး ခစားရရျခငး ရ___ မရ___

-- အျခား အပစမား (ဥပမာ၊ ႏြမးပါးသမား၊ သကႀကးရြယအမား) အကးခစားရရျခငး ရ___ မရ___

အပစတစခတငးအတြက “ရ” လင မညသ႔၊ “မရ” လင မညသ႔ ရငးလငးခက ပါရေစရမည။

အေကာငအထညေဖာရာတြင ေကးရြာသားမားက အလပ ခန႔ထားႏငမႈ ရ___ မရ___

“ရ” လင အပငး - (၁) - ပါ ရနပေငြ ေပးအပျခငး (Block Grants) တြင ေန႔တြကခႏင တကဆင စစေဆးပါ။

အမည ရာထး ဥက႒၊ ေကးရြာ ဖြ႔ၿဖးေရး အေထာကအကျ

ပ ေကာမတ

လကမတ

ရကစြ

56

Attachment 4: Project Forms PC-15 Safeguards Screening

FORM PC 15: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Region / State:

Township:

Village tract:

Village:

Sub-project Name:

Technical Facilitator:


Monitoring

indicators

Responsibilities

Implementation

schedule

Cost

estimates

Name: Position: Head, Village Development Support Committee

Signature:

Date:

57

ပစ - စ - ၁၅ - သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင စမခန႔ခြမႈ စမခက

ျဖညသြငးၿပးစးေသာပစက ေကးရြာ ဖြ႕ၿဖးေရး စမကနးလပငနးခြတြင ဆက၍ တြရမည။

စမကနး လပငနးခြ သဘာဝ ပတဝနးကင စမခန႔ခြမႈ အစအစဥ(EMP) က ၿမ႕နယအဆင ေကးလကဥးစး အငဂငနယာက အတညျပေပးရမည။

တငးေဒသႀကး/ ျပညနယ

ၿမ႕နယ:

ေကးရြာအပစ:

ေကးရြာ:

စမကနး လပငနးခြ အမည:

စမကနး နညးပညာ ကညပပးသ

ဆးကး သကေရ

ာက ႏငေျခ

ႀကတင ျပငဆ

ငမႈ

ႀကးၾကပမည

အစအစဥ တာဝန

အေကာငအထည ေ

ဖာမည အခန ဇယား

ခန႔မနး ကန

ကေငြ

အမည: ရာထး ဥက႒၊ေကးရြာဖြ႔ၿဖးေရးအေထာကအကျပ ေ

ကာမတ

လကမတ: ရကစြ:

Attachment 4: Project Forms PC-14 Voluntary Donation Form

58

FORM PC 14: VOLUNTARY DONATION FORM

Region / State :

Township:

Village tract:

Village:

Sub-project Name:

Technical Facilitator:

Name of land owner: NRC Number: Beneficiary of the sub-project: Y/N

Sex: Age: Occupation:

Address:

Description of land that will be

taken by the sub-project: Area affected:

Total landholding

area:

Ratio of land affected to total

land held:

Map code,

if available:

Description of annual crops growing on the land now and project impact:

Details Number

− Trees that will be destroyed

− Fruit trees

− Trees used for other economic or household

purposes

− Mature forest trees

− T

Describe any other assets that will be lost or must be moved to implement the project:

Value of donated assets:

Will affected people need to be physically relocated?

By signing or providing thumb-print on this form, the land user or owner agrees to contribute assets to

the project. The contribution is voluntary. If the land user or owner does not want to contribute his/ her

assets to the project, he or she should refuse to sign or provide thumb print, and ask for compensation

instead.

Date: ________ Date: ________

59

Village Development Support Committee Affected persons signature

Representative’s signature (both husband and wife)

ပစ - စ - ၁၄ - ဆႏၵအေလာက လဒါနးျခငး

တငးေဒသႀကး/ ျပညနယ

ၿမ႕နယ

ေကးရြာအပစ

ေကးရြာ

စမကနး လပငနးခြ အမတအ

မည

စမကနး နညးပညာ ကညပပး

သ

ေျမပငရင အမည ႏငငသား စစစေရးကတျပား

အမတ

စမကနး လပငနးခြ အကး ခစားရသ ဟ

တ/ မဟတ

ကား/မ အသက ရာထး

လပစာ

စမကနး လပငနးခြက အသး ခမည ေျ

မယာ အေနအထား

အသးခမည ဧရယာ စစေပါငး ဧရယ

ာ

အသးခမည ဧရယာ

ႏင စစေပါငး ဧရယာ

အခး

ေျမပ အမတ

60

စမကနးေၾကာင ထခကမည စကပင သးႏ

အေသးစတ အေရအတြက

− ခတလရမည သစပင

− သးပင

− စကပင

− သစပငႀကး

− အျခား

စမကနး အေကာငအထညေဖာရန ပကစး ဆး႐ႈးသြားမည ပငဆငမႈ/ ပစၥညးမား

လဒါနးမႈ တနဖး

ထခကသမား ေရႊ႕ေျပာငးေပးရျခငး ရမရ

ဤ ပစ စာရြကေပၚတြင လကမတ ေရးထးျခငး၊ လကေဗြႏပျခငးျဖင ေျမအသးျပသ/ပငရငသည မမပငေျမက

စမကနးအား လဒါနးျခငးက ေဖာျပသည။ ဆႏၵအေလာက လဒါနးျခငး ျဖစသည။ အကယ၍ ေျမအသးျပသ/ပငရငသည

မမပငေျမက စမကနးအား လဒါနးလျခငး မရပါက ဤပစစာရြကေပၚတြင လကမတေရးထးျခငး မျပဘ ျငငးပယ၍

ေလာေၾကး ေတာငးခႏငသည။

ရကစြ............................

ေကးရြာ ဖြ႔ၿဖးေရးအေထာကအကျပ ေကာမတ က

ယစားလယ လကမတ

ရကစြ.........................

အကးသကေရာကသ ပငရင လကမတ

(ဇနးေမာငႏ ႏစဥးစလး လကမတထးရမည)

61

Attachment 6: Filled-up PC Forms from the Field (Myanmar)

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

Annex 1

List of Landowners for Voluntary Donations

72

Annex

List of Landowners for Voluntary Donations

Safeguards Monitoring

Compliant Form

Township - Bokpyin

List of Sub-

projects: Cycle 1

Village Tract Village

Name of Sub-projects

SP Code

Number

Number of Donor / Name of

Landowners

Area Voluntarily Donated

Total Area Owned by the Donor

Ratio or percent 300 sq.

Mtr

Remarks

Ohn Taw Kan Ni Par

Water Supply(Tube Well) BP-1-02 U Man Inn 900 20000 4.500% Ok

Ka Mar Chaung

Ka Mar Chaung

Water Supply(Tube Well) Bp-1-05 U Linn Kyi 900 40114 2.244% Ok

Ah Twin Bokpyin

Ka Yein Taing

Water Supply(Tube Well) Bp-1-08

U Za Wa Na(Monastic) 900 79200 1.136% Ok

Sa Tein

Sa Tein Chaung Hpyar

Multipurpose Building Bp-1-11

U Hargi Met+Daw

Kayar 36000 1584000 2.273% Ok

Sa Tein

Mi Kyaung Chaung

Water Supply(Tube Well) Bp-1-13

U Khyut + Daw Aye 2400 79200 3.030% Ok

Ban Ga Lar

Yay Naut Chaung

Water Supply(from Spring) BP-1-18

U Kyut Ni + Daw San

Aye 523 1188000 0.044% Ok

Chaung Ka Hpet Htin Mei

Multipurpose Building BP-1-22

U Kyaw Lwin Oo + Daw

Myint Myint Aye 2000 792000 0.253% Ok

Htaung Ngar Thaing

Htaung Ngar Thaing

Hand Dug Well Bp-1-24

U Than Soe + Daw Yi

Aye 1400 59400 2.357% Ok

Htaung Ngar Thaing

Chaung Mon


U Myut Lwin + Daw Shwe

Hmone 1225 9900000 0.012% Ok

73

Kawt But

Kawt But

Water Supply(from Spring) Bp-1-27

U Kar Shi+Daw Aei

Laday 400 792000 0.051% Ok

Ma Noe Yone

Lan Pun Ngan

Water Supply(Earthen Pond) Bp-1-29

U Sun Aung + Daw San

San Thu 2500 792000 0.316% Ok

Noet Ngwar

Kawt Ye Gyi


Daw Aye Kyi and Daw

Moe Moe Aye 3000 1980000 0.152% Ok

Han Ka Pyu

Han Ka Pyu

Multipurpose Building Bp-1-34 U Shein 3200 7825500 0.041% Ok

Yae Ngan Gyi

Yae Ngan Gyi

School Building Bp-1-38

U Maung Aung Myo

Latt 4800 120000 4.000% Ok

Ah Lel Man Lan Gan

Water Supply(from Spring) Bp-1-52

U Myint Lwin + Daw Mon Ngwar 400 4800 8.333% Ok

not selection

other place (No

other

water

source

except in

this site)

Total 60548 25256214 0.240%

List of Sub-

projects: Cycle 2 Bokpyin

Village Tract

Village


SP Code

Number

Number of Donor / Name of Landowners



Ratio or percent

300 sq. Mtr

Remarks

Yae Ngan Gyi

Kun Taung Earthen Road Bp-2-12

U Myint Aung and U Naung

Phyu 60000 1980000 3.030% Ok

74

Sa Tein Than Zone

Water Supply (Tube well) Bp-2-25

U Aung Htay+Daw Tin

Win 529 10000 5.290% Ok

not selection

other place (No other

water

source

except in

this site)

Sa Tein Sa Tein Water Supply (Tube well) Bp-2-26

U Eibrahin+Daw

Harli Byar 2500 90000 2.778% Ok

Ban Ga Lar

Ban Ga Lar

Water Supply (Earthen Pond) Bp-2-27 U Than Aye 625 15000 4.167% Ok

Chaung Ka Hpet

Chaung Ka Hpet Earthen Road Bp-2-30

(10-donors)U A Chut, U

Chet Hpaung,U

Sein Than, Daw Mi Moe, U Shee Chan,

U Thi, Daw San, U A

Khein, Daw Win, U Tun

Lwin 68640 1584000 4.333% Ok

Chaung Ka Hpet Htin Mei

Water Supply(Gravity Feed Water) BP-2-31

U Kaw Wei Da(Monastic) 900 198000 0.455% Ok

Ka Mar Chaung

Ayechanmying-1

Water Supply(Gravity Feed Water) Bp-2-32 U Aung Htun 900 16000 5.625% Ok

not selection

other place (No other

water

source

except in

this site)

Noet Ngwar

Kawt Ye Nge Jetty BP-2-39

U Own Kyaw (or) U Aung

Myint 3000 7128000 0.042% Ok

Noet Ngwar

Shwe Kyar Kone

Water Supply (Tube well) Bp-2-42

U Aung Soe Moe+Daw San

Win 1600 3960000 0.040% Ok

Htaung Kha Mat

Thirimyaing

Water Supply (Tank and Pipe line only) Bp-2-43

U Min Zaw+Daw Thein Oo 300 18000 1.667% Ok

Ah Lel Man Langan

Water Supply(Concrete Trustel) BP-2-53 U Myint Lwin 625 150000 0.417% Ok

75

Total 139,619 15,149,000 0.922%

Township - Ngaputaw

List of Sub-projects: Cycle 1

Village Tract Village


SP Code Number

Number of Donor / Name of

Landowners



Ratio or percent 300

sq. Mtr

Remarks

Kyauk Tan

Hlaing Bhone

Earthen Road,Box Culvert & Small Bridge NPT-1-03

Saw One Dal Phoe 15246 435600 3.500% Ok

Saw Dol

Powe 2178 435600 0.500% Ok

Saw Lel

Htoo Paw 23086.8 435600 5.300% Ok along the road

alignment

Naw Thae

Sal 23086.8 435600 5.300% Ok along the road

alignment

Naw Thein

Shwe 7840.8 435600 1.800% Ok

Nant Kyin

War 39204 435600 9.000% Ok along the road

alignment

Saw Dol

Khuu 27007.2 435600 6.200% Ok along the road

alignment

Nant Hla

Myint 45738 740520 6.176% Ok along the road

alignment

War Kone Kone Gyi Gravel Road with Brick Boundary NPT-1-10

U Ngwe Thein 1740 174240 0.999% Ok

U Lin Htet

Aung 900 609840 0.148% Ok

U Kyaw

Myint Kyaw 2760 609840 0.453% Ok

War Kone Yay Ma Nay Kone

Gravel Road with Brick Boundary NPT-1-11 U Myint Win 600 130680 0.459% Ok

U Myo Tun 1800 435600 0.413% Ok

76

U Aung

Thein Myint 1500 87120 1.722% Ok

U Maung Maung 1200 65340 1.837% Ok

U Than Nyunt 2400 217800 1.102% Ok

U Zaw Zaw

Aung 900 43560 2.066% Ok

U Kyaw

Hlaing Win 1800 130680 1.377% Ok

Kyar Kan Thae Kone Earthen Road NPT-1-18

U Kyaw Lwin Oo 8250 87120 9.470% Ok

along the road alignment

U Aung

Kyaw Zaw 36900 1742400 2.118% Ok

Daw Than

Aye 35100 2613600 1.343% Ok

Community 8250

Kyar Kan Chaung Hpyar Su Earthen Road NPT-1-19

U Han Shwe 31500 1655280 1.903% Ok

U Soe Naing 7500 304920 2.460% Ok

U Ohn Lwin 7500 87120 8.609% Ok along the road

alignment

U Soe Win 6000 609840 0.984% Ok

Oke Twin Kone Gyi Gravel Road with Brick Boundary NPT-1-54 U Mg Chit 900 87120 1.033% Ok

Daw Khin Myo Aye 150 43560 0.344% Ok

U Tin Aye 150 43560 0.344% Ok

Oke Twin Ma Yan Chaung

Gravel Road with Brick Boundary NPT-1-55

Daw Phae Kyi 1260 217800 0.579% Ok

U Tin Soe 2100 217800 0.964% Ok

U Soe Win 900 87120 1.033% Ok

U Soe Lin 300 43560 0.689% Ok

77

Daw Myo

Myo 1500 2178000 0.069% Ok

Daw Yin

Sein 450 43560 1.033% Ok

Daw San

Mu 600 435600 0.138% Ok

Oke Twin

Phoe Kalar Kone

Gravel Road with Brick Boundary NPT-1-56

Daw San Maw 750 87120 0.861% Ok

U San Ngwe 750 87120 0.861% Ok

Oke Shit Kwin

Rakhine Kone Pond Renovation NPT-1-33 U Nyi Nyi 16900 435600 3.880% Ok

Total 366697.6 17402220

Township - Ngaputaw


VT VL


SP Code Number

Number of Donor / Name of Landowners



Ratio or percent

300 sq. Mtr Remarks

in square feet 3229.17

Kyauk Ta Gar

Kyauk Ta Gar Earthen Road NPT-2-22 Daw Aye San 6011.28 703494 0.854% Ok

U San Htay 1800 87120 2.066% Ok

U Soe Tint 1800 762300 0.236% Ok

U Than Han 13982.76 777981.6 1.797% Ok

U Tin Aung 13982.76 760993.2 1.837% Ok

U Kyaw Thet 4007.52 325828.8 1.230% Ok

Daw Moe Moe 17990.28 551034 3.265% Ok

U Moe Kyal

Tun 24001.56 432115.2 5.554% Ok along the road

alignment

U Nyi Nyi Tun 13982.76 337154.4 4.147% Ok

U Min Ye Tun 6011.28 413384.4 1.454% Ok

Kwin Bet Kwin Waing Electricity NPT-2-28 Monastery 400 217800 0.184% Ok

Kwin Bet Thae Chaung

Multi Purpose Building NPT-2-29 Community 2400

Kwin Bet Ywar Thit Kone Electricity NPT-2-31 U San Myint 400 174240 0.230% Ok

Kwin Bet Thae Phyu Kone

Multi Purpose Building NPT-2-32

Daw Tin Tin San 2400 261360 0.918% Ok

Oke Twin Ma Yan Chaung

Sand Gravel Road NPT-2-51 U Han Myint 600 217800 0.275% Ok

U Aung Ko Lat 1200 435600 0.275% Ok

U Aung Ngwe 1500 435600 0.344% Ok

U Zaw Min

Naing 1500 261360 0.574% Ok

Oke Twin Yae Twin Kone

Sand Gravel Road NPT-2-53

U Soe Moe Aung 450 217800 0.207% Ok

78

U San Oo

Hlaing 900 217800 0.413% Ok

U Aung Ngwe 150 174240 0.086% Ok

U Han Shwe 1200 261360 0.459% Ok

Daw Than Than Htay 150 174240 0.086% Ok

Daw Kyi Htwe 75 43560 0.172% Ok

U Aung Aung 225 261360 0.086% Ok

Hpaung Doe Het Let Electricity NPT-2-60 U Mg Hla 400 9750 4.103% Ok

Total Land

Area 117520.2 3363870 3.494% Ok

Township - Ywangan


VT VL


SP Code Number

Number of Donor / Name

of Landowners




Mtr

Remarks

Inn Kone & Ngar Su Inn Kone

Piped water supply YNN-1-15 U Kyaw win 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

Nyaung Aing

Nyaung Aing

Piped water supply YNN-1-33 U Aung Kyi 150 80000 0.188% Ok Compliant

U Aye Mg 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

U Mg Htwe 250 40000 0.625% Ok Compliant

U Nyi Lay 250 80000 0.313% Ok Compliant

U Mg Myint 150 90000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Saw Mg 150 50000 0.300% Ok Compliant

U Win Kyaw 150 40000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Kan Aye 250 40000 0.625% Ok Compliant

D Khin Tint 1200 90000 1.333% Ok Compliant

U Mg Kyi 200 60000 0.333% Ok Compliant

U Kan Htay 150 90000 0.167% Ok Compliant

79

D Nyaing Mg 150 40000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Kyi Mg 150 390000 0.038% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Mi 20 10000 0.200% Ok Compliant

Nyaung Aing Lat Pan Pin

Piped water supply YNN-1-34

U Mae 225 60000 0.375% Ok Compliant

Myin Kya Doe Yae Hla Graval Road YNN-1-50

U Htun Shein 1200 150000 0.800% Ok Compliant

U Nyo Lwin 1000 120000 0.833% Ok Compliant

D San Cho 300 60000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Tin Shein 150 40000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Phyu 600 80000 0.750% Ok Compliant

U Shwe Mg 600 900000 0.067% Ok Compliant

D Pu 800 400000 0.200% Ok Compliant

Thein Kone

Ngwe Taung


U San Win 200 20000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Ye Mg 300 30000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Zaw Htun 200 20000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Nyein Aung 400 50000 0.800% Ok Compliant

U Aye Mg 400 50000 0.800% Ok Compliant

U Kyan Nyein 300 40000 0.750% Ok Compliant

U Myint Kyaw 200 10000 2.000% Ok Compliant

Monastary

Own 400 40000

1.000% Ok Compliant

Kyan Taw Kyan Taw Piped water supply YNN-1-24

U Mg Nyo 60 20000 0.300% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Nyunt 75 40000 0.188% Ok Compliant

80

D Chein 75 40000 0.188% Ok Compliant

U Mg Ngal 75 20000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Hla Saung 75 20000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Shwin 90 20000 0.450% Ok Compliant

U Toe Pyae 75 20000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Tin Hein 75 20000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Kan Oo 105 40000 0.263% Ok Compliant

U Htun Si 300 80000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Tut 125 20000 0.625% Ok Compliant

Ah Lae Chaung

Ah Lae Chaung Electricity YNN-1-44

U Tin Aung 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

Kyaut Myaung

Kyaut Myaung


U Chit Po 16 40000 0.040% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Aye 625 20000 3.125% Ok Compliant

D Myaing 225 80000 0.281% Ok Compliant


U Win Zaw

Oo 112 40000

0.280% Ok Compliant

U Thant Wai 112 60000 0.187% Ok Compliant


U Than Zaw

Oo 16 40000

0.040% Ok Compliant

D Khin Than

Htay 16 40000

0.040% Ok Compliant

U Soe Hlaing 16 40000 0.040% Ok Compliant

Nwar Ban Gyi

Nwar Ban Gyi


U Hla Ngwe 400 40000 1.000% Ok Compliant

81

U Soe Soe

Htay 800 80000

1.000% Ok Compliant

U Kan Ray 3000 200000 1.500% Ok Compliant

U Win Hlaing 800 40000 2.000% Ok Compliant

U Kan Ray 350 40000 0.875% Ok Compliant

U Aung Bu 662 40000 1.655% Ok Compliant

D Mi Pu 620 40000 1.550% Ok Compliant

U Thaung

Myint 344 40000

0.860% Ok Compliant

U Nwe Mg 240 40000 0.600% Ok Compliant

U Htway

Aung 300 20000

1.500% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Ai 144 20000 0.720% Ok Compliant

U Khin Aung 194 20000 0.970% Ok Compliant

D Khin Sein 186 80000 0.233% Ok Compliant

Myin Kya Doe

Min Taing Pin


U Ba Lwin 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

D Kyin Thi 36 130680 0.028% Ok Compliant

U Saw Mg 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Naing 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Phay Thin 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U kuu 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Sein 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Mae 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Htein win 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

82

U Kyaw win 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Ba Thaung 36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

D Hnin Khaing

36 43560 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Aung Kyaw

Soe 36 43560

0.083% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Hu 400 43560 0.918% Ok Compliant

Myin Kya Doe Tat Poke


D Nu 25 43560 0.057% Ok Compliant

U Nyunt Mg 25 43560 0.057% Ok Compliant

U Mg Myo 25 43560 0.057% Ok Compliant

U Aung Htoo

Ngal 25 43560

0.057% Ok Compliant

U Ba Way 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

D Tin May 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Toke Phyu 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Nyein Mg 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Naing win 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

D Own Tin 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Lin Aung 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Htun Shwe 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

U Win Mg 25 21780 0.115% Ok Compliant

Kyaut Pone

Hta Min Paung


U Zaw Htoo 900 80000 1.125% Ok Compliant

U Ba Sein 300 20000 1.500% Ok Compliant

U Hla Htun 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

83

U Naing Htun 200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Hla Aung 200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U MgToe 200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Htun Kyi 200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Maye 100 10000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Mying

200 60000 0.333% Ok Compliant

D Win May 200 60000 0.333% Ok Compliant

Nyaung Aing

Pein Ne Kone


U Htun Kyi 360 60000 0.600% Ok Compliant

D Win Shwe 600 80000 0.750% Ok Compliant

Myaing Myaing Piped water supply YNN-1-41

U Win Naing Oo

200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Ba Thein 500 80000 0.625% Ok Compliant

U Thar Han 400 10000 4.000% Ok Compliant

U Mone 100 60000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Soe Myint 400 60000 0.667% Ok Compliant

U Paw San 200 40000 0.500% Ok Compliant

D Thein Yi 100 10000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Aung Pone 150 40000 0.375% Ok Compliant

U Sein Htun 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

U Shwe Khye 50 10000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Moe Zaw 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Zaw

Oo 200 40000

0.500% Ok Compliant

84

D Tin Hnint 200 60000 0.333% Ok Compliant

U Mya Lwin 400 80000 0.500% Ok Compliant

Pha Yar Gyi Kone

Thet Kel Lwin


U Chit Phay 375 40000 0.938% Ok Compliant

Ah Lae Chaung Lu Gravel Road YNN-1-45

U Aung Maung

400 120000 0.333% Ok Compliant

U San Oo 400 40000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Chein 300 40000 0.750% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Maye 100 120000 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Phoe san 400 360000 0.111% Ok Compliant

U Aye 300 120000 0.250% Ok Compliant

U Hla Tun 100 200000 0.050% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Myint 400 120000 0.333% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Thu 600 360000 0.167% Ok Compliant

D Own Si 500 320000 0.156% Ok Compliant

U Tun Nyo 400 120000 0.333% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Htay 600 320000 0.188% Ok Compliant


U Nyein Aung 600 320000 0.188% Ok Compliant

U Chit Mg 100 360000 0.028% Ok Compliant

U Win Naing 600 360000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Than 100 80000 0.125% Ok Compliant

U Htay 400 240000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Myint Thein 400 320000 0.125% Ok Compliant

85

U Win Taing 100 200000 0.050% Ok Compliant

U Myint Lwin 300 400000 0.075% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Htoo 400 280000 0.143% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Chit 300 160000 0.188% Ok Compliant


Kyaut Pone Inn Hla


D Tin Pu 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant


kyaut pi zat koe Su Gravel road YNN-1-32

U Shwin mg 260 52272 0.497% Ok Compliant

U sein ko 280 10188 2.748% Ok Compliant

U Chit Sein 1350 174240 0.775% Ok Compliant

U Sein Min 360 139392 0.258% Ok Compliant

U Mg Kyi 900 139392 0.646% Ok Compliant

Pha Yar Gyi Kone Ya Tha Gyi


U Kyay 16 130680 0.012% Ok Compliant

U Khin Mg

Aye 16 43560

0.037% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw lay 16 87120 0.018% Ok Compliant

Lel Kaing Inn Taw Piped water supply YNN-1-36

U Than Aung 18 87120 0.021% Ok Compliant

D Phwar

Phyu 18 43560

0.041% Ok Compliant

D Tin Hla 225 87120 0.258% Ok Compliant

U Thein Moe

Aung 225 43560

0.517% Ok Compliant

U Win Thein 600 43560 1.377% Ok Compliant

U Aye Kyaw 900 65340 1.377% Ok Compliant

86

Kyaur Hgnet Taung Gyar Gravel road YNN-1-28

U Chit Sein 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U Aung Htwe 30 87120 0.034% Ok Compliant

U Kan Oo 150 43560 0.344% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw 40 43560 0.092% Ok Compliant

U Thein Aung 50 434560 0.012% Ok Compliant

U Myar Aung 290 43560 0.666% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Ni 75 43560 0.172% Ok Compliant

D Own May 236 21780 1.084% Ok Compliant

D Khin May 320 43560 0.735% Ok Compliant

U Lwn 220 43560 0.505% Ok Compliant

Kyan Taw Mya Thein Tan


U Win Kyaw 75 34848 0.215% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Toke 75 21780 0.344% Ok Compliant

U Than Kyaw 45 17424 0.258% Ok Compliant

U Paw Aung 1225 87120 1.406% Ok Compliant

U Saw Htun 150 43560 0.344% Ok Compliant

U Maw Oo 75 43560 0.172% Ok Compliant

Sein Kaung Pyay Thar


U Kan Hta 160 43560 0.367% Ok Compliant

U Tun Mg 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U San Thein 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U Aung Hla 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U Win Phay 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

87

U Tun Mg 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

D Aye Si 160 43560 0.367% Ok Compliant

U Aye Phay 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

D Hla Tin 220 43560 0.505% Ok Compliant

U Myint wai 180 43560 0.413% Ok Compliant

D Khin Su 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U San Oo 120 43560 0.275% Ok Compliant

U Myint wai 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U Htun Shwe 200 43560 0.459% Ok Compliant

U Aung Khin 140 43560 0.321% Ok Compliant

D Saw Pu 120 43560 0.275% Ok Compliant

U Phoe tone 4 40000 0.010% Ok Compliant

D Mya Yin 80 40000 0.200% Ok Compliant

U Soe Aung 80 40000 0.200% Ok Compliant

D Khin Aye 50 40000 0.125% Ok Compliant


U Thein win 70 40000 0.175% Ok Compliant

U Nyein Mg 40 40000 0.100% Ok Compliant

U Htooe 60 40000 0.150% Ok Compliant

U Tay 60 40000 0.150% Ok Compliant


U Tay 70 40000 0.175% Ok Compliant

88

D Pway 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant


U Tun Khin 90 60000 0.150% Ok Compliant

U Kaung Mg 70 40000 0.175% Ok Compliant

U Cherin 50 40000 0.125% Ok Compliant

U Kaung 90 40000 0.225% Ok Compliant

U Ba Kaung 40 50000 0.080% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Pyae 50 30000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Aung Maung

30 40000 0.075% Ok Compliant

U Tun si 40 30000 0.133% Ok Compliant


U Phoe Kyaw 50 30000 0.167% Ok Compliant

U Toe Lone 35 40000 0.088% Ok Compliant

U Aung Maung

80 40000 0.200% Ok Compliant

U Toe Po 50 40000 0.125% Ok Compliant

U Chit Mg 30 30000 0.100% Ok Compliant

U Kyone 100 40000 0.250% Ok Compliant

U Phoe tone 20 20000 0.100% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw Thin 30 30000 0.100% Ok Compliant

U Ba Thin 25 25000 0.100% Ok Compliant

U Pu Htway 70 40000 0.175% Ok Compliant

U Aung Maung

150 60000 0.250% Ok Compliant

89

Yone Taung

Dote Htoe Ray Earth Road YNN-1-06

U Kyaw Zan 217 261360 0.083% Ok Compliant

U Hlaing Min

Oo 871 87120

1.000% Ok Compliant

U Kyan Mg 87 43560 0.200% Ok Compliant

U Aung Shwe 348 348480 0.100% Ok Compliant

D Kyin Sein 871 87120 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Win Naing

Oo 87 65340

0.133% Ok Compliant

U Ba Han 217 206910 0.105% Ok Compliant

Kyaut Hgnet

Padone Kine


U Mg Shwe 625 21780 2.870% Ok Compliant

Lin Way Kyaut Taw Earth Road YNN-1-16 U Shwe Toe 217 43560 0.498% Ok Compliant

Kyaut Myaung

Taung Khaung Pwar

Piped water supply YNN-1-03 U Ye Win

81 21780 0.372% Ok Compliant

U Shwe Ray 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

U Ye Swe 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

D Pyay Gyi 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

D Own Min 81 65340 0.124% Ok Compliant

D Mya win 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

U Aung Zaw

Htet 81 21870

0.370% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Ni 81 21870 0.370% Ok Compliant

U Kyaw San

Oo 81 43560

0.186% Ok Compliant

U Aung lin 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

U Zaw Myint 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

U Aung Hlaing

81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

90

U Tin Phay 81 43560 0.186% Ok Compliant

U Thein Myint

Htun 81 65340

0.124% Ok Compliant

U Myo Tint 81 34848 0.232% Ok Compliant

D Tin Oo 81 65340 0.124% Ok Compliant

U Aung Hla 81 130680 0.062% Ok Compliant

U Khin Mg

Soe 900 130680

0.689% Ok Compliant

Inn Kone & Ngar Su Ngar Su Gravel road YNN-1-16

U Kyaw Ngwe 600 40000 1.500% Ok Compliant

U Chit Saung 600 60000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Phoe Phyu 600 60000 1.000% Ok Compliant

D Win kyi 600 60000 1.000% Ok Compliant

U Nyunt Aung 300 60000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Chit Saung 300 60000 0.500% Ok Compliant

U Mg Win 500 40000 1.250% Ok Compliant

Total Land

Area 60815 19197974 0.317%

Township - Ywangan


VT VL


SP Code Number

Number of Donor / Name

of Landowners




Mtr

Remarks

Nwar Ban Gyi

Kazet Gravel road

YNN-2-02 U Tin Khaing 100 1440000 0.01% Ok

U Phone Kywe 200 360000 0.06% Ok

U Kyaw Mg 100 640000 0.02% Ok

91

Daw Than Tint 100 120000 0.08% Ok

U Tin Poe 300 2560000 0.01% Ok

Daw Nwet Kyi 200 640000 0.03% Ok

U Thaung Naing 300 3240000 0.01% Ok

U Zaw Oo 300 360000 0.08% Ok

U Kyi Aung 300 360000 0.08% Ok

Daw Tin Pyone 100 640000 0.02% Ok

U Chit Saung 300 360000 0.08% Ok

U Ohn Phay 28 250000 0.01% Ok

U Tint Lwin 300 1440000 0.02% Ok

U Maung Kan 200 1440000 0.01% Ok

U Tin Khaing 100 1440000 0.01% Ok

U Ba Aung 200 360000 0.06% Ok

U Wine 200 1000000 0.02% Ok

U Myo Htoo 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Myo Lay 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Sein Kyaw Win 300 1960000 0.02% Ok

Daw Khin Wine 300 360000 0.08% Ok

U Chit Aung 300 2560000 0.01% Ok

U Kyaw Soe 300 4840000 0.01% Ok

U Ba Maung 300 1000000 0.03% Ok

U Ou Shwe 300 1000000 0.03% Ok

Doke Toe Yae

Ywar Soe Gyi

Piped water supply

YNN-2-06 U Aye Saung 25 40000 0.06% Ok

U Nyein Tin 25 40000 0.06% Ok

Daw Tar 25 40000 0.06% Ok

92

Village Own 3625 40000 9.06% Ok

Myo Gyi Doung

Mee Son Electricity YNN-2-

13 U Mg Aye 16 10000 0.16% Ok

U Than Htay 16 15000 0.11% Ok

Myo Gyi Kin Tet Water Supply

YNN-2-15 U Myo Tun 576 1440000 0.04% Ok

Myo Gyi Ong Ma Water Supply

YNN-2-16 U Zaw Win 25 2500 1.00% Not Ok

water source

U Win Myaing 25 2500 1.00% Not Ok

water source

U Yan Aung 25 40000 0.06% Ok

Village Own 625 43560 1.43% Ok

Inn Kone Ngar Su

Ngar Seu

Gravel road YNN-2-

17 U Hla Han 3300 60000 5.50% Ok

along the road

alignment

U Chit Pyae 2000 80000 2.50% Ok

U Phoe Phyu 3000 140000 2.14% Ok

U Chit Thwin 3000 120000 2.50% Ok

U Saw Phae 3500 160000 2.19% Ok

U Tin Hla 1000 40000 2.50% Ok

U Myat Thar 1500 60000 2.50% Ok

U Tin Oo 2000 80000 2.50% Ok

U Poe Shwe 2000 80000 2.50% Ok

U Aung Moe 1500 60000 2.50% Ok

Kyan Taw Mya Paw

Saw Gravel road YNN-2-

24 U Chit Mg 800 40000 2.00% Ok

U Hla Mg 1600 80000 2.00% Ok

U Chit Oo 1600 80000 2.00% Ok

U Mg Pyae 400 20000 2.00% Ok

93

U Moe Win 400 20000 2.00% Ok

Kyan Taw Mya Zay

Ti Gravel road YNN-2-

25 U Aung Win Oo 200 40000 0.50% Ok

Daw in Nu 2880 60000 4.80% Ok

U Myint Win 160 40000 0.40% Ok

U Mai Wai 5400 600000 0.90% Ok

U Maung Nyunt 240 120000 0.20% Ok

U Ba Shwe 200 40000 0.50% Ok

Kyauk Hnget

Sin Hsar Pyar Gravel road

YNN-2-27 U Myint Mg 1800 60000 3.00% Ok

U Ba Chit 1460 40000 3.65% Ok

U Myint Mg (1) 4800 144000 3.33% Ok

U Phoe Thay 464 40000 1.16% Ok

U Myint Mg 1 250 40000 0.63% Ok

U Chit Than 360 80000 0.45% Ok

U Phone Mone 585 40000 1.46% Ok

Nyaung Aing

Nyaung Phyu Yoe Gravel road

YNN-2-31 U Thein Aung 410 108900 0.38% Ok

U Mg Kwee 400 217800 0.18% Ok

Daw Me Pu 720 348480 0.21% Ok

U San Oo 520 250470 0.21% Ok

U Phoe Win 225 196020 0.11% Ok

U Ngae Gyi 700 261360 0.27% Ok

U Tun Po 390 392040 0.10% Ok

U Htay Mg 135 217800 0.06% Ok

U San Shwe 300 217800 0.14% Ok

U Than Phay 280 165528 0.17% Ok

94

Nyaung Aing

Inn Gyi (S) Gravel road

YNN-2-32 U Hpoe Mat 1500 261360 0.57% Ok

U Aung Than 210 43560 0.48% Ok

U Thar Phyu 190 304920 0.06% Ok

U Myint Wai 200 130680 0.15% Ok

D Hla Htoo 310 65340 0.47% Ok

U Hpoe Saue 72 87120 0.08% Ok

U Hpoe Wai 720 130680 0.55% Ok

U Mg Nyo 210 130680 0.16% Ok

U Ba Thein 35 32670 0.11% Ok

U Mg Hamwe 502.5 217800 0.23% Ok

U Mya Aye 340 217800 0.16% Ok

Nyaung Aing

Htone Hpo Gravel road

YNN-2-33 U Kyaw naing 300 130680 0.23% Ok

U Chit Phyu 100 87120 0.11% Ok

U Khin Mg Htwe 300 130680 0.23% Ok

U Mg Hmwe 400 217800 0.18% Ok

U Kyaw Htoo 150 87120 0.17% Ok

U Phoe Mae 300 108900 0.28% Ok

Sat Chan Sat Chan Gravel road

YNN-2-36

Daw Khin Htwe 450 80000 0.56% Ok

U Kyaw Li 450 80000 0.56% Ok

U Tin Shein 225 80000 0.28% Ok

U Nyan Htun 210 40000 0.53% Ok

Daw Yin May 900 160000 0.56% Ok

U Kyaw Li 225 40000 0.56% Ok

U Chit Wai 600 80000 0.75% Ok

95

U San Nyein 225 40000 0.56% Ok

U Zaw Myo Oo 210 40000 0.53% Ok

U Zaw Min Htway 90 16000 0.56% Ok

U Aye Htun 360 72000 0.50% Ok

U Baw Phyu 240 72000 0.33% Ok

U Than Zaw Oo 600 80000 0.75% Ok

U Myint Thein 300 40000 0.75% Ok

U Chit Tun Gyi 300 40000 0.75% Ok

U Tun Ngwe 450 80000 0.56% Ok

U Mg Thin 300 40000 0.75% Ok

U Phoe Thu 510 80000 0.64% Ok

U Win Oo 600 80000 0.75% Ok

U Kyi Nyo 75 20000 0.38% Ok

Myaing Inn

Hkawng Electricity (400 Vline)

YNN-2-39 U Aung Min 4 200000 0.00% Ok

Myaing Pway Nwar Gravel road

YNN-2-41 U Kyo 750 8000000 0.01% Ok

Sin Ghaung

Kaing Su Gravel road

YNN-2-44 U Chit Nyan 960 871200 0.11% Ok

U Kyaw Oo 195 217800 0.09% Ok

U Myint Naing 615 130680 0.47% Ok

U Hla Mg 450 174240 0.26% Ok

U Myo Win 180 43560 0.41% Ok

U Myo Aung 300 87120 0.34% Ok

U Kyar Aung 570 80000 0.71% Ok

U Ba Shinn 315 217800 0.14% Ok

U Htway Mg 225 348480 0.06% Ok

96

Daw Ni 1320 304920 0.43% Ok

U Soe Pi 270 87120 0.31% Ok

Daw Mar Oo 225 130680 0.17% Ok

U Kyaw Lwin 1050 304920 0.34% Ok

U Aye Lwin 180 130680 0.14% Ok

U Myint Ngwe 945 348480 0.27% Ok

U Nge 150 43560 0.34% Ok

Daw Than Shwe 1890 348480 0.54% Ok

U Kyaw win 480 653400 0.07% Ok

U Soe Lwin 840 217800 0.39% Ok

U Soe Thu 150 21780 0.69% Ok

Myin Kya Doe

Le Pyar Piped water supply

YNN-2-45 U Hope Tun 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Tin Aung 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Soe Min 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Mg Pu 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Ohn Paw 100 80000 0.13% Ok

U Ba Saw 100 40000 0.25% Ok

Phayar Gyi Kone

Phayar Gyi Kone

Multipurpose Building

YNN-2-51 Village Own 2400 -

Myin Kya Doe

Myin win Piped water supply

YNN-2-48

U Phoe Htaung 225 40000 0.56% Ok

U Moe Myint 100 12000 0.83% Ok

U Kyaw Tin 100 160000 0.06% Ok

U Chit Oo 100 120000 0.08% Ok

U Tin Ngwe 100 400000 0.03% Ok

U Tin Hla 100 240000 0.04% Ok

U Aye Maung 100 160000 0.06% Ok

U Tin Nyunt 100 280000 0.04% Ok

97

U Ngwe Thein 100 40000 0.25% Ok

U Aye Ko 100 80000 0.13% Ok

U Aung Than 100 80000 0.13% Ok

U Chit Oo 100 80000 0.13% Ok

U Maung Gyi 100 400000 0.03% Ok

U Aye Maung 100 160000 0.06% Ok

U Soe Thwin 1200 120000 1.00% Ok

Myin Kya Doe

Pway Gyi Gravel road

YNN-2-47

U Aung Hlaing 300 400000 0.08% Ok

U Htun Yi 300 400000 0.08% Ok

U Wai Lwin 240 4000000 0.01% Ok

U Thein Lin 200 200000 0.10% Ok

U San Nyain 300 200000 0.15% Ok

U Win Kyaw 200 400000 0.05% Ok

U Shwe Htun 300 20000 1.50% Ok

U Win Maung 300 40000 0.75% Ok

U win Hlaing 300 40000 0.75% Ok

U Kyaw Swe 100 10000 1.00% Ok

U Win Phay 320 60000 0.53% Ok

U San Min 400 40000 1.00% Ok

Thein Kone

Inn Gyi (n)

Electricity (400 Vline)

YNN-2-23 U Chit Win 400 2000000 0.02% Ok

Thein Kone

Kyauk Gu Ti

Electricity (400 Vline)

YNN-2-22 U Myo Be 400 2000000 0.02% Ok

Myin Twin Myin Twin Water Supply

YNN-2-50 U Zaw Win 600 40000 1.50% Ok

U Chit Han 36 40000 0.09% Ok

U Chit Han 400 15000 2.67% Ok

98

U Thar Htun 600 30000 2.00% Ok

U Naing Win 400 20000 2.00% Ok

D Tin Hla 320 10000 3.20% Ok

U Kyaw Own 1000 120000 0.83% Ok

D Hla May 100 5000 2.00% Ok

D win Kyi 36 40000 0.09% Ok

D Tin Thar 36 30000 0.12% Ok

U Thein Win 36 40000 0.09% Ok

U Kyan Mar 36 40000 0.09% Ok

U Chit Hlaing 36 20000 0.18% Ok

U Kyi Soe 36 60000 0.06% Ok

D Khin Naung 36 20000 0.18% Ok

U Thein Win 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Nay Lin Aung 600 80000 0.75% Ok

Village Own 750 80000 0.94% Ok

Ywa Gyi Sein Chin

Pin Electricity (400 Vline)

YNN-2-54 U Ba Wai 400 60000 0.67% Ok

Ya Gyi Ya Gyi Earth Road

YNN-2-53 U Htun Wai 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Own Kyaw 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Kyaw Myint 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Thein Shwe 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Mg Oo 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Myint Oo 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Aye Kyaw 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U kyaw Aye 500 40000 1.25% Ok

99

U Kyaw Soe 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Soe Min 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Win Htoo 500 40000 1.25% Ok

D Thin Kyi 1000 40000 2.50% Ok

U Sai Lin Naing 1000 40000 2.50% Ok

U Chit Min 300 20000 1.50% Ok

U Soe Pyan 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Than Wai 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Khin Mg 500 20000 2.50% Ok

U Thein Han 1000 40000 2.50% Ok

U Own Myint 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Aung Ba 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Khan Htoo 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U soe 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Khin Kyaw 750 30000 2.50% Ok

U Shwe Thaung 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U Myo Win 720 40000 1.80% Ok

U Ba Thein 2160 120000 1.80% Ok

D Tin Hla 500 40000 1.25% Ok

D Hla Si 500 40000 1.25% Ok

U chit Phay 500 40000 1.25% Ok

Myin Kya Doe

Taw Kyal Earth Road

YNN-2-46 U Myint Lwin 1200 60000 2.00% Ok

U Aung Moe 1500 80000 1.88% Ok

U Kyaw Khin 1500 40000 3.75% Ok

U Ba Sein 600 40000 1.50% Ok

U Chan Thar 1200 135600 0.88% Ok

100

U Nyunt Aung 600 80000 0.75% Ok

U Kyaw Khin 600 40000 1.50% Ok

U Thein Lwin Oo 600 160000 0.38% Ok

Nan Hkon Nan Hkon Village market

YNN-2-55

U Nyunt Maung 16200 435600 3.72% Ok

Myin Kya Doe

Kone Gyi Gravel Road

YNN-2-49 U Mg Win 600 15000 4.00% Ok

U Soe Thwin 1500 42000 3.57% Ok

145811.5 67181568 0.22%

Documents

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report · has the required ECoPs and 33% have both EMP and ECoPs. Furthermore, there was full documentation of the signing of voluntary donation