34
English Assessment Validity February 2012 Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl Queen Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College District 1

English Assessment Validity February 2012

  • Upload
    xaria

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

English Assessment Validity February 2012. Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl Queen Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College District. English Assessment Test. New Peralta students take assessment tests for placement in English classes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

English Assessment Validity February 2012

Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl QueenOffice of Institutional Research

Peralta Community College District

1

Page 2: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

English Assessment Test

• New Peralta students take assessment tests for placement in English classes.

• Course placement from test scores is recommended but not mandatory.

• A student can take courses without placement tests if prerequisites are met.

2

Page 3: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

ACT Compass Test

• Peralta currently uses the ACT Compass test, CENG, for English placement.

• CENG tests English proficiency with separate writing and reading tests.

• This will soon change...

3

Page 4: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Statewide Online Assessment

• From Student Success Task Force, January, 2012:“… all students will have access to common online assessment tools for English, mathematics and ESL and to pre-testing programs that help improve assessment outcomes. They also will be able to take the results of their tests to any community college in the state.”

4

Page 5: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

For now: ACT Compass TestPlacement in English Courses

A decision rule based on the two test scores selects an English course: • transfer level (English 1A)• degree applicable (English 201A)• Pre-collegiate (Basic Skills).

5

Page 6: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Placement in English Course

• If the writing score is less than 22, the student is not assessed into a course and must see a counselor.

• 699 students in the sample data had low writing scores and were excluded.

6

Page 7: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Data

• Students taking CENG-recommended English courses in Fall 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Spring 2010.

• Took test immediately preceding semester when they took English course.

• Never took test prior to semester when they took English course.

7

Page 8: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Validity

Validity measured in three ways:• Relationship between assessment scores and

grades.• Comparison of assessed and non-assessed.• Comparison of students who took the “right”

course (recommended by CENG) and “wrong” course (not recommended by CENG).

8

Page 9: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed and Took Right Course

9

Courses Count %

Eng 1A 1571 57%

Eng 201A 593 21%

Basic Skills* 598 22%

TOTAL 2762 100%

* English 252AB, 267AB, 268AB, 269AB

Page 10: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed - Grade %

10

A B C D F W

Eng 1A 28% 23% 12% 5% 8% 25%

Eng 201A 21% 19% 15% 9% 9% 27%

Basic Skills 23% 22% 16% 4% 10% 24%

ALL 25% 22% 13% 6% 9% 25%

Page 11: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Placement and Grades

• 57% were placed in English 1A.• 47% overall got A’s or B’s.• 25% overall withdrew from class.

11

Page 12: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Grades vs. Test Scores

Are assessment test scores positively correlated with grades?

We use ANOVA (Analysis of Variance).

12

Page 13: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Reading Test Scores by Grade

13

Courses A - Test ave B - Test ave C - Test ave D - Test ave F/W- Test ave ANOVA Sig.

Eng 1A 91.61 87.33 86.98 87.01 87.88 0.000

Eng 201A 84.17 81.35 80.36 83.75 81.12 0.000

Basic Skills 61.84 58.92 57.99 60.08 57.29 0.036

Page 14: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

All Test Scores by Grade

14

Courses ANOVA

Sig. ReadingANOVA

Sig. WritingANOVA

Sig. Combined

Eng 1A 0.000 0.000 0.000

Eng 201A 0.000 0.727 0.727

Basic Skills 0.036 0.170 0.481

Page 15: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Grades vs. Test Scores Analysis

• Reading test scores most sensitive to grades.• Students who get A’s have higher average

test scores than those who have lower grades.

• Writing test and Combined Tests only significant for English 1A.

15

Page 16: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Predicted Chance of Success

As test scores get higher, does predicted chance of success increase?

We use logistic regression.

16

Page 17: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success

17

Page 18: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success

18

Page 19: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success

19

Page 20: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Predicted Chance of Success

As test scores get higher, predicted chance of success increases but …

• Only for reading test scores.• Different courses are selected across range of

scores so much is filled in by software. • Results aren’t statistically significant.

20

Page 21: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessment vs. No AssessmentDo assessed students do better in their assigned courses than students who don’t take the assessment test?

We use ANOVA and Chi Square tests.

21

Page 22: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Counts

22

Courses Assessed Not Assessed

Eng 1A 1571 1838

Eng 201A 593 621

Basic Skills* 598 727

TOTAL 2762 3186

* English 252AB, 267AB, 268AB, 269AB

Page 23: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Not Assessed - Grade % (Similar to Assessed)

23

A B C D F W

Eng 1A 25% 25% 15% 5% 6% 24%

Eng 201A 18% 18% 19% 9% 11% 25%

Basic Skills 21% 18% 13% 6% 10% 31%

ALL 23% 22% 16% 6% 8% 25%

Page 24: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed vs. Not Assessed GPA

24

Courses Assessed Course GPA

Not Assessed Course GPA

ANOVA Sig.

Eng 1A 2.76 2.74 0.730

Eng 201A 2.47 2.32 0.099

Basic Skills 2.58 2.51 0.426

TOTAL 2.61 2.66 0.212

Page 25: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed vs. Not Assessed GPA

No significant results:• Students who are assessed have similar class GPA

as those who are not assessed.

25

Page 26: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed vs. Not Assessed Success

26

Courses Assessed % Success

Not Assessed % Success

Chi-Square Sig.

Eng 1A 62% 65% 0.112

Eng 201A 55% 56% 0.795

Basic Skills 61% 53% 0.004

TOTAL 60% 60% 0.984

Page 27: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Success - Assessed vs. Not Assessed

Significant only at basic skills level:• Students who are assessed have greater success

than those who are not assessed.

27

Page 28: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Assessed – “Right” vs. “Wrong” Course

Do assessed students who take the right course do better than assessed students who take the wrong course?

We use Chi Square and ANOVA.

28

Page 29: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Counts - Right vs. Wrong Course

29

Courses Right Course Count

Wrong Course Count

% Right Course

Eng 1A 1571 378 81%

Eng 201A 593 479 55%

Basic Skills 598 127 82%

TOTAL 2762 984 74%

Page 30: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Success - Right vs. Wrong

30

Courses Right Course Success %

Wrong Course Success %

Chi Square Sig.

Eng 1A 62% 53% 0.001

Eng 201A 55% 52% 0.364

Basic Skills 61% 61% 0.932

Page 31: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Success - Right vs. Wrong

Significant only for English 1A: • Assessed students who take right course have

greater success than those who take wrong course.

31

Page 32: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

GPA - Right vs. Wrong

32

Courses Right Course GPA

Wrong Course GPA

ANOVA Sig.

Eng 1A 2.76 2.39 0.000

Eng 201A 2.47 2.34 0.178

Basic Skills 2.58 2.58 0.986

Page 33: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

GPA - Right vs. Wrong

Significant only for English 1A: • Assessed students who take right course have

higher GPA than those who take wrong course.

33

Page 34: English Assessment Validity  February 2012

Conclusions

• Validity confirmed. • Useful for counselors.• Assessed results aren’t much different from

non-assessed, pre-requisite method.• Most students take English 1A.• Students assessed into English 1A do

significantly better than “wrong” students.

34