29
Engaging public sector clients From service-delivery to co-production John Alford Copenhagen Business School/University of Copenhagen 24 April 2014

Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

  • Upload
    vonhu

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Engaging public sector clients From service-delivery to co-production John Alford Copenhagen Business School/University of Copenhagen 24 April 2014

Page 2: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Questions and misconceptions Questions Misconceptions

1. What is co-production? The governance misconception.

2. Whom do we serve? The unitary citizen misconception.

3. Who are the co-producers? The ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception.

4. When should co-production be utilised? The exploitation misconception.

5. How can co-production be elicited from citizens?

The motivation misconception.

Page 3: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

The backdrop: differing traditions

(Anglo-) American perspective

European perspective

Page 4: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

1. What is co-production?

→ the governance misconception: Co-production is about joint deliberation or consultation – i.e. involving citizens in deciding what to do or how to do it.

But…

© John Alford 2014

Page 5: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Defining co-production (1)

Type of involvement

Performed by Government organisation alone

Govt organisation and external party jointly

External party alone

Governance (deciding what to do)

Govt decision Joint decision Private decision

Production (doing it)

Production by govt organisation Co-production Private production/

self-service

© John Alford 2014

Page 6: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Defining co-production (2)

Type of involvement

Performed by Government organisation alone

Govt organisation and external party jointly

External party alone

Governance (deciding what to do)

Govt decision Joint decision Private decision

Planning/ design Govt planning or design Joint planning/design Private planning or design

Production (doing it)

Production by govt organisation Co-production Private production/

self-service

© John Alford 2014

N.B. also ‘co-creation’

Page 7: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Defining co-production (3)

Type of involvement

Performed by Government organisation alone

Govt organisation and external party jointly

External party alone

Governance (deciding what to do)

Govt decision Joint decision Private decision

Planning/ design Govt planning or design Joint planning/design Private planning or design

Production (doing it)

Production by govt organisation Co-production

‘Nudged’ production/ self-service

Private production/ self-service

© John Alford 2014

Page 8: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

2. Whom do we serve?

→ the ‘unitary public’ misconception: The failure to distinguish among different facets of the public.

But…

Page 9: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Citizens or customers?

Not ‘one or the other’, but both.

Page 10: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

The public’s different roles The citizenry: the collective ‘we’ who: contribute to determining what government should do. have various rights and responsibilities.

Client roles: Beneficiary clients: receive private value but don’t pay

money directly for it (e.g. welfare recipients, school pupils, public housing tenants)

Obligatees/regulatee: are obliged to receive the service (e.g. prisoners, regulated individuals and companies)

© John Alford 2014

Volunteers: People engaging in pro-social behaviour: formal: with government or nonprofit/community organisation informal: random acts of sociability.

Receive private value

Receive public value

Page 11: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Other co-producers

• Companies (e.g. as contractors). • Non-profit/voluntary/community sector organisations (e.g.

as contractors or collaborators). • Other government organisations – in national, state or local

government (e.g. in ‘joined-up’ government).

© John Alford 2014

Page 12: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Our focus here

• Citizens as part of the collective ‘we’. • Beneficiary clients. • Obligatees/regulatees. • Volunteers, formal and informal.

© John Alford 2014

Page 13: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

3. Who are the co-producers?

→ the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to have.

But…

© John Alford 2014

Page 14: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Potential co-producers The fire brigade example

© John Alford 2014

Page 15: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Potential co-producers The fire brigade example

Purpose framed in output terms:

To put out fires quickly and efficiently.

© John Alford 2014

Page 16: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Who does the work? The case of the fire brigade

External (co-producers)

• Equipment suppliers • Emergency phone line

operators • Water authorities • Road authorities • Police • Neighbours. • Property owners/occupants.

Internal (producers) • Fire fighters • Despatchers • Truck maintainers • Operational planners • Trainers • Admin staff

© John Alford 2014

Page 17: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Fire service outputs The core production process

Fire hosed with water

Fire truck speeds to

fire

Despatcher sends fire

truck

000 called House catches fire

Fire put out

Fire brigade

© John Alford 2014

Page 18: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Fire service outputs Co-productive contributions

Fire hosed with water

Fire truck speeds to

fire

Despatcher sends fire

truck

000 called House catches fire

Smoke alarms

installed

Property owner/

occupant

Neighbour Fire brigade

Road authority

Water corporation Equipment

suppliers Hydrant

maintained Streets

accessible Truck ready

to go

Telecoms functioning

Maintenance contractors

Fire put out

© John Alford 2014

Page 19: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Purpose framed in output terms: To put out fires quickly and efficiently.

Purpose framed in outcome terms: To minimise the damage arising from fires to life, property and the environment.

© John Alford 2014

Potential co-producers More on the fire brigade example

Page 20: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Minimise damage to life, limb & property

Fire service outcomes Further co-productive contributions

Fire put out

Fire hosed with water

Fire truck speeds to

fire

Despatcher sends fire

truck

000 called House catches fire

House less likely to catch fire in

first place

Smoke alarms

installed

Fire occurs but has less impact

on house

Timely evacuation from burning house

Fire response plan already formulated

House built to resist fire

Fire prevention measures

already present

Neighbour Fire brigade

Road authority

Water corporation Equipment

suppliers Hydrant

maintained Streets

accessible Truck ready

to go

Telecoms functioning

Maintenance contractors

Building Stds regulator

Property owner/

occupant

© John Alford 2014

Page 21: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Who does the work? The case of the fire brigade

Internal (producers) • Fire-fighters • Despatchers • Truck maintainers • Operational planners • Trainers • Admin staff • Community education staff. • Technical advice staff.

External (co-producers) • Emergency phone line

operators • Equipment suppliers • Water authorities • Road authorities • Police • Citizens • Property owners/ occupiers

© John Alford 2014

Page 22: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

→ the exploitation misconception: co-production is about government getting citizens to shoulder the cost of service-delivery.

But…

4. When should co-production be utilised?

Page 23: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Circumstance Issue

Inter-dependency: value cannot be achieved without contribution by the external party.

How best to utilise co-production.

Substitutability: value can be achieved by either the organisation or the external party.

Whether the external party or the organisation is able to perform the work better and/or at less cost.

© John Alford 2014

Circumstances where co-production should be used ‘It all depends’

Page 24: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

5. How can co-production be elicited?

→ the motivation misconception: people are motivated by either: What’s in it for me? (self-interest)

or The ‘warm inner glow’ (altruism).

But…

Page 25: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Eliciting co-production

Organisational instruments

Motivators

Facilitators

Co-producers’ ability

Propensity to co-produce

Co-producers’ willingness

Facilitators

FRAM

ING

© John Alford 2014

Motivators

Sanctions. Material rewards. Intrinsic rewards. Solidary incentives. Normative appeals.

Facilitators

Simplification. Assistance.

Page 26: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Value-creating social exchanges

Government gets Citizen or client gets Co-productive effort by citizens or clients

Some mix of material and non-material rewards

Social exchange: diffuse and deferred exchanges among multiple parties rather than quid pro quo exchanges between buyers and sellers.

Page 27: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Citizens

Government

Government organisation

Client roles

Paying customers

Beneficiaries

Obligatees

‘Mandates’ from political deliberation

Taxes

Public value

Policies Budgets

Private value

Money

Information, compliance,

co-production Public value

Legal authority

Social exchanges between government organisations, citizens and clients

Page 28: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Conclusions

• Co-production is not just a nice idea – it’s already here! • Co-production is not about getting citizens to do work that

should be done by government. • Whether to use co-production all depends. • Citizens co-produce for their own good reasons, which we can

only partially influence.

© John Alford 2014

Page 29: Engaging public sector clients - CBS · Engaging public sector clients ... → the ‘wouldn’t it be loverly’ misconception: Co-production is a new thing which would be nice to

Further reading

John Alford, Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-production, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2009. John Alford and Janine O’Flynn, Rethinking Public Service Delivery: Managing with External Providers, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2012.