Upload
edward-almazan
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
1/167
ENG 415 MODULE 4
NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY
OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF ARTS
AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
COURSE CODE: ENG 415
COURSE TITLE: LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
2/167
ENG 415 LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM
117
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
3/167
3
COURSE
GUIDE
ENG 415
LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM
Course Team Dr. Felix E. Gbenoba and Fidelis N.Okoroegbe
(Course Developers/Writers) –
NON !ro". #$o %e&inde
(Course Editor) – '
Dr. On$eka 'u&uku (!rogra**e
+eader/Course Coordinator) , NON
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
4/167
NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
5/167
National Open niversit$ o" Nigeria
-eaduarters
0/1 #&*adu 2ello Wa$
3itoria 'sland4 +agos
#bu5a O""ie
5 Dar es Salaam StreetOff Aminu Kano Crescent
Wuse II4 Abuja
e,*ail6 e n tr a l in "o 7 n ou . e d u . n g
8+6 . n o u . e d u . n g
!ublis&ed b$6
National Open niversit$ o" Nigeria
'92N6
#ll 8ig&ts 8eserved
!rinted b$6
mailto:[email protected]://www.nou.edu.ng/http://www.nou.edu.ng/mailto:[email protected]
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
6/167
For
National Open niversit$ o" Nigeria
CONTENTS
PAGE
'ntrodution ............................................................
.......... iv
Course #i*s
..................................................................... iv
Course Ob5etives
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
7/167
............................................................ v
Working t&roug& t&e Course
........................................... v
Course :aterials
............................................................... v
9tud$ nits
........................................................................ v
;extbooks and 8e"erenes
................................................. vi
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
8/167
#ssign*ent
File................................................................. vii
;utor,:arked #ssign*ent
................................................. vii
Final Exa*ination and
Grading.........................................
viii -o to Get t&e :ost "ro* t&is Course
..............................
viii ;utors and
;utorials........................................................... ix
9u**ar$..................................................................
........... x
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
9/167
INTRODUCTION
e!"ome #o ENG 415: L$#erar% T&eor% a'(
Cr$#$"$sm) 't is a t&ree,redit unit ourse "or 0
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
10/167
Ea& unit explains t&e basi priniples o" t&e t&eor$ it
addresses4 inluding t&e basi priniples o" literar$
appliation4 in order to enable students rite t&eir on
t&eoretial interpretations o" literature and read it&
insig&t &at t&e t&eorists t&e*selves &ave ritten.
;&e
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
11/167
ourse in general4 de*onstrates &o ritial t&eories
bot& argue and overlap it& one anot&er4 so*eti*es
overturning4 and so*eti*es building on t&e insig&ts o"
o*peting t&eories. 2$ stud$ing a nu*ber o" literar$
t&eories4 $ou are re*inded t&at *ultiple viepoints arei*portant i" $ou are to see t&e &ole piture and to grasp
t&e ver$ proess o" understanding t&at underlies &u*an
experiene4 t&ereb$ inreasing $our abilit$ to see bot&
t&e value and t&e li*itations o" ever$ *et&od o" vieing
t&e orld.
;&is Course Guide gives $ou an overvie o" t&e ourse. 'talso provides $ou it& in"or*ation on t&e organisation
and reuire*ents o" t&e ourse.
COURSEAIMS
2asiall$4 t&is ourseai*s at6
• enabling students to grasp some teoretical concepts in literature
b! relating tem to our e"er!da! e#perience
• e#plaining to students o$ to appl! teoretical perspecti"es toliterar! $or%s
• re"ealing to students te relationsips among teories&teir
differences' similarities' strengts' and $ea%nesses(b! appl!ingtem all to literar! $or%s.
COURSE
O*+ECTIVES
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
12/167
Ea& unit o" t&e ourse also &as so*e set ob5etives.
;&ese ill guide $ou in $our stud$. ;&e$ are usuall$
stated at t&e beginning o" ea& unit4 and &en $ou are
t&roug& it& stud$ing t&e units go bak and read t&e
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
13/167
13
ob5etives. ;&is ould &elp $ou assi*ilate t&e task $ou
&ave set out to a&ieve. On o*pletion o" t&e ourse4 $ou
s&ould be able to6
a) discuss te emergence of literar! teor! and criticism
b) e#plain te earliest teorists and critics of literaturec) e#amine te postulations of te "arious teories of literature
d) discuss te strengts and $ea%nesses of te teories
e) appl! te teories to te anal!sis and criticism of $or%s of
literature
OR,ING THROUGH THISCOURSE
;o o*plete t&e ourse4 $ou are reuired to read t&e
stud$ units and ot&er related *aterials. Aou ill also
need to undertake pratial exerises "or &i& $ou need
a pen4 a notebook4 and ot&er *aterials t&at ill be listed
in t&is guide. ;&e exerises are to aid $ou in
understanding t&e t&eories being presented. #t t&e end
o" t&e ourse4 $ou ill rite a "inal exa*ination.
COURSEMATERIALS
;&e *a5or *aterials $ou ill need "or t&isourse are6
• Course *uide
• Stud! +nits
• ,ele"ant te#tboo%s4 including
references-furter reading
te ones listed under
• Assignment file• .resentation scedule
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
14/167
1/
STUDY UNITS
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
15/167
;&ere are = stud$ units in t&is ourse as "ollos6
Mo(u!e 1 A' O-er-$e. o/ L$#erar% T&eor% a'(Cr$#$"$sm
nit 2akground to +iterar$ ;&eor$ and Critiis*
nit = +iterar$ (Critial) ;&eor$6 # De"inition
nit B +iterar$ ;&eor$ as a Disipline
nit 0 +iterar$ Critiis*6 # De"inition
nit Funtions o" +iterar$ Critiis*
nit 1 ;&e 8elations&ip beteen t&e
+iterar$ Criti and t&e Writer
Mo(u!e 0 T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 12
nit :i*eti ;&eor$ o" #rts
nit = For*alist ;&eor$ and Critiis*
nit B Ne Critiis*
nit 0 9truturalist
Critiis* nit !oststr
u)tur alis* nit 1
Deonstrution
nit 9e*iotis
Mo(u!e 3 T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 02
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
16/167
nit :arxist ;&eor$ and Critiis*
nit = 2iograp&ial Critiis*
nit B -istorial Critiis*
nit 0 Ne -istoriis*
nit !s$&oanal$ti ;&eor$
Mo(u!e 4 T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 32
nit Fe*inist/Gender Critiis*
nit = 8eader,8esponse ;&eor$
nit B !ostolonial ;&eor$
TET*OO,S AND REFERENCES
:an$ books &ave been reo**ended in t&e ourse. Aou
*a$ is& to pur&ase t&e* "or "urt&er reading.
#bra*s4 :.-. (B). The Mirror and the Lamp. +ondon6 Ox"ord!.
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2ww w.unilorin.edu .ng/u!li"#$ i on% /balogun / D o "5. d & .
2arr$4 !eter. (=
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
17/167
(t& ed.). Ne Aork6 W.W Norton Co*pan$.
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
18/167
2la*ires4 -. (). A History of Literary Criticism.+ondon6
:a*illan
!ress +td.
C&ilds4 !eter H Foler4 8oger (=
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
19/167
C&iago6 niversit$ o" C&iago !ress.
:oore,Gilbert4 2art 9tanton4 Garet&4 H :ale$ Will$.(Eds). ().
)ostcolonial Criticism. Ne Aork6 #ddison4 Wesle$4+ong*an.
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
20/167
8ie4 !&ilip H Waug& !atriia. (). Modern
Literary Theory: A Reader . (0t& ed.). Ne Aork6
8outledge.
8i&ter4 David -. (Ed.). (). The Critical Tradition:
Classic Te%ts and Contemporary Trends. 2ed"ord
2ooks6 2oston.
8ivkin4 ulie H 8$an4 :i&ael. (Eds). ().Literary Theory: An
Anthology . :alden4 :assa&usetts6 2lakell.
;$son4 +ois. (=ed nu*ber o" t&e ;utor,
:arked #ssign*ents (;:#s). Ever$ unit in t&is ourse &as
a tutor,*arked assign*ent. ;&e total *ark "orassign*ents is B
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
21/167
FINAL EAMINATION ANDGRADING
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
22/167
;&e "inal exa*ination o" ENG 415 ill be o" t&ree &ours
duration. #ll areas o" t&e ourse ill be exa*ined. Find
ti*e to read t&e unit all over be"ore $our exa*ination.
;&e "inal exa*ination ill attrat
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
23/167
signi>antl$ i*prove $our &anes o" passing t&e
ourse. ;&e *ain bod$ o" t&e unit guides $ou t&roug&
t&e reuired reading "ro* ot&er soures. ;&is ill usuall$
be eit&er "ro* $our set books or "ro* $our ourse guides.
;&e "olloing is a pratial strateg$ "or orking t&roug&
t&e ourse. '" $ou run into trouble4 telep&one $our tutor.8e*e*ber t&at $our tutor?s 5ob is to &elp $ou. W&en $ou
need assistane4 do not
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
24/167
&esitate to all and ask $our tutor to provide it. -eed
t&e "olloing advie are"ull$6
12 ,ead tis Course *uide torougl!8 it is !our first assignment292 Organise a stud! scedule2
32 :ote te time !ou are e#pected to spend on eac unit and o$ te
assignments relate to te units2 Wate"er metod !ou coose to
use' !ou sould decide on and $rite !our o$n dates for $or%ing
on eac unit2/2 Once !ou a"e created !our o$n stud! scedule' do e"er!ting
!ou can to stic% to it2 6e major reason tat students fail is tatte! get beind $it teir course $or% . If !ou get into difficulties$it !our scedule' please let !our tutor %no$ before it is too latefor elp2
52 6urn to +nit 1 and read te Introduction and te Objecti"es for
te +nit2;2 Assemble te stud! materials2 Information about $at !ou need
for a unit is gi"en at te beginning of eac unit2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
25/167
TUTORS ANDTUTORIALS
;&ere are eig&t &ours o" tutorials provided in support o"
t&is ourse. Aou ill be noti"ied o" t&e dates4 ti*es and
loation o" t&ese tutorials4 toget&er it& t&e na*e and
p&one nu*ber o" $our tutor4 as soon as $ou are
alloated a tutorial group. Aour tutor ill *ark and
o**ent on $our assign*ents4 keep a lose at& on
$our progress and on an$ di">ulties $ou *ig&t
enounter. Aou *ust *ail $our tutor,*arked assign*ents
to $our tutor ell be"ore t&e due date (at least toorking da$s are reuired). ;&e$ ill be *arked b$ $our
tutor and returned to $ou as soon as possible. Do not
&esitate to ontat $our tutor b$ telep&one4 e,*ail4 or
disussion board i" $ou need &elp. ;&e "olloing *ig&t be
iru*stanes in &i& $ou ould "ind &elp neessar$.
Contat $our tutor i"6
• !ou do not understand an! part of te stud! units or te assigned
readings
• !ou a"e difficult! $it te self&test e#ercises
• !ou a"e a =uestion or problem $it assignment' $it !our tutors comments on an assignment or $it te grading of an
assignment
Aou s&ould tr$ $our best to attend t&e tutorials. ;&is is
t&e onl$ &ane to &ave "ae,to, "ae ontat it& $ourtutor and ask uestions &i& are ansered instantl$.
Aou an raise an$ proble* enountered in t&e ourse o"
$our stud$. ;o gain t&e *axi*u* bene"it "ro* ourse
tutorials4 prepare a uestion list be"ore attending t&e*.
Aou ill learn a lot "ro* partiipating in disussions
ativel$.
SUMMA
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
26/167
RY
ENG 415: L$#erar% T&eor% a'( Cr$#$"$sm introdues
$ou to t&e *a5or t&eoretial approa&es to t&e stud$ o"
literature. ;&is is beause t&e stud$ o" literature is nolonger – i" it ever as – si*pl$ t&e stud$ and
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
27/167
evaluation o" poe*s4 novels and pla$s. 't is also t&e
stud$ o" t&e ideas4 issues4 and di">ulties &i& arise in
an$ literar$ text and in its interpretation. Ne ritial
t&eories e*erge as literar$ s&olars develop ne
*et&odologies o" reading4 espeiall$ in t&e arts and&u*anities. 2$ stud$ing t&ese t&eories4 $ou ould &ave
been provided it& a Ktool kit? "or $our on in"or*ed
ritial reading and t&oug&t about orks o" literature.
;&is Course Guide gives $ou an overvie o" &at to
expet in t&e ourse o" t&is stud$.
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
28/167
MAI
N
COUR
SE
CONTEN
TS
PAGE
Mo(u!e 1 A' O-er-$e. o/ L$#erar% T&eor% a'(Cr$#$"$sm 1
nit 2akground to +iterar$ ;&eor$ and Critiis*
LL..
nit = +iterar$ (Critial) ;&eor$6 # De"inition
nit B +iterar$ ;&eor$ as a Disipline
nit 0 +iterar$ Critiis*6 # De"inition LLLLLLLL
nit Funtions o" +iterar$ Critiis* =
nit 1 ;&e 8elations&ip beteen t&e
and t&eWriterLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Mo(u!e 0 T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 12 3
nit :i*eti ;&eor$ o" #rts LLLLLLLLLLL
B=
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
29/167
nit = For*alist ;&eor$ and Critiis* LLLLLLLLB
nit B Ne Critiis* LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.01
nit 0 9truturalist Critiis* LLLLLLLLLLL..B
nit !ost str u)tur alis* LLLLLLLLLLLL..1B
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
30/167
nit 1 Deonstrution 1
nit 9e*iotisLLLLLLLLLLL 0
Mo(u!e 3 T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 02 666666666673
nit :arxist ;&eor$ and Critiis* LLLLLLLLL B
nit = 2iograp&ial Critiis* LLLLLLLLLLLL B
nit B -istorial Critiis* LLLLLLLLLLLLL.
nit 0 Ne -istoriis* <
nit !s$&oanal$ti ;&eor$LLLLLLLLLLLL
<
Mo(u!e T&eor$es o/ L$#era#ure 32 11
nit Fe*inist/Gender Critiis* LLLLLLLLL.
nit = 8eader,8esponse ;&eor$ LLLLLLLLL... =0
nit B !ostolonial ;&eor$ LLLLLLLLLLLL B
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
31/167
MODULE 1 AN OVERVIEW OF LITERARY THEORY
AND CRITICISM
+nit 1 0ac%ground to iterar! 6eor! and Criticism
+nit 9 iterar! Critical) 6eor!B A Definition+nit 3 iterar! 6eor! as a Discipline
+nit / iterar! CriticismB A Definition
+nit 5 unctions of iterar! Criticism+nit ; 6e ,elationsip bet$een te iterar! Critic and te
Writer
UNIT 1 BACKGROUND TO LITERARY THEORY AND
CRITICISM
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content
3.1 6e :ature of iterar! 6eor! and Criticism3.9 ,elationsip bet$een iterar! 6eor! and iterar!
Criticism
3.3 6e Comple#it! of iterar! 6eor! and Criticism
/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
In tis unit' $e are going to underta%e a brief o"er"ie$ of te rise and
de"elopment of literar! teor! and criticism4 especiall! in te 1?t
and9@t centuries2 One of te most significant canges tat a"e occurred inte field of literar! teor! and criticism is $ere to locate te locus of
meaning in a te#t2 In te discipline of literar! criticism4 it $as originall!assumed tat meaning resides $it te autor2 6us' te purpose of interpretation ten $as to discern te autors intention $ic $ouldunloc% te te#tual meaning of te $or% . Eo$e"er' $it time' critics
began to focus more concertedl! on te te#t itself8 ence meaning cameto be seen as residing $it te reader2 0! subjecting a $or% of art to a
particular teoretical construct' !ou can ac=uire a deeper understandingof te $or% and a better appreciation of its ricness2 6is unit $illenable !ou grasp te basis of literar! teorising and criticism b! relating
tem to !our e"er!da! e#perience2 It is also e#pected tat b! te end of
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
32/167
te unit' !ou sould be able to appl! teoretical perspecti"es to literar!
$or%s2
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• trace te istorical de"elopment of literar! teor! and criticism
• list some of te notable teorists and critics of literature2
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 The Natue !" L#tea$ The!$ a%& C#t#'#()
According to Kell! *riffit 9@@9)' prior to te 9@t centur!' tein"estigation of te nature and "alue of literature ad ad a long and
distinguised istor!' beginning $it .lato and Aristotle and continuing
into modern times $it suc figures as Sir .ilip Sidne!' on Dr!den'
Samuel onson' William Words$ort' Samuel 6a!lor Coleridge' and
4atte$ Arnold2 0ut teir in"estigations focused primaril! on
e"aluation' not interpretation2 6e! e#plored $at literature is and
praised or condemned $or%s tat failed to meet $ice"er standardste! deemed essential2 In T'e Reu!li"( to cite one e#treme e#ample'
.lato condemned #ll literature because it stirs up te passions(lust'
desire' pain' anger(rater tan nurtures te intellect2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Wat $as te concern of earl! in"etigators on te nature and "alue of
literatureF
According to ide 0alogun 9@11)' te istor! of literature is te istor!
of literar! criticism2 6e latter as an all! of te former ma%es creati"e
$riting more complementar! and elps to conceptualise te pedagogical
import of te#ts of literature into ideological standpoints2 O"er te ages'literar! teories a"e been te $eapons for te realisation of tis crucial
obligation of literar! criticism. or 6err! Gagleton4 in Li$er#r) T'eor)1??;)' te emergence of teor! $as a $a! of emancipating literar!
$or%s from te strangleold of a ci"ilised sensibilit!4 and tro$ingtem open to a %ind of anal!sis in $ic' in principle at least' an!one
could participate. 4odern literar! teor! graduall! emerged in Guropeduring te 1?t centur! and gained momentum in te 9@t centur!2
Gagleton argues tat teor! is te bod! of ideas and metods used in te
practical reading of literature2 or im4 teories re"eal $at literaturecan mean2 It is a description of te underl!ing principles b! $ic $e
attempt to understand literature2 6at is to sa!4 all literar! interpretation
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
33/167
dra$s on a basis in teor! since it is literar! teor! tat formulates te
relationsip bet$een autor and $or% .
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Wat is literar! teor! and $en did modern literar! teor! emerge in
GuropeF
3)2 Re,at#!%(h#- .et/ee% L#tea$ The!$ L#tea$C#t#'#()
G"en toug modern literar! teorising and criticism emerged during
te nineteent centur!' bot attained greater eigts in te 9@t Centur!2
In fact' te 9@t Centur! could be appropriatel! termed te age of
criticism. 6e ricness and te comple#it! of literar! teor! can be seenin te man! critical mo"ements tat sprang up and in te entusiasm
$it $ic man! critics practised te art2 6e impact of te ne$
ps!cologies $as deepl! felt in criticism. 4ar#ism4 structuralism'formalism4 semiolog!' ps!coanal!sis4 deconstruction and post&colonialcritical studies are among te man! teories tat dominated te centur!2
Among te notable critics of te centur! includeB I.A. ,icards' .., ea"is' 62 S Gliot' 62 G Eulme' William Gmpson' Cristoper Caud$ell'
on Cro$e' Allen 6ate' ,obert .erm Warren' GHra .ound' Wa!ne
0oot and Eenr! ames etc2
In te preface to A Hi%$or) o& Li$er#r) Cri$i"i%* 1??1)' A. :2 effaresgi"es no room for an! doubt about te %insip of literature' literar!criticism and literar! teories2 Ee sa!sB
6e stud! of literature re=uires %no$ledge of
conte#ts as $ell as of te#ts2 Wat %ind of person
$rote te poem4 te pla!' te no"el' te essa!FWat forces acted upon tem as te! $rote2
Wat $as te istorical' te political' te
pilosopical' te economic'
te cultural bac%ground4 etcF
All of tese are antecedents to te birt of a particular literar!
production2 6e argument of effares is tat for literature to be on
course' it becomes e#pedient tat a structure is put in place to re"eal its
meaning be!ond te literal le"el2 0roadl!' te#ts of literature $ould
possess t$o le"els of meaning & te literal and te super&literal2 6e
super&literal meaning of te#ts of literature is te ideological implication
of te same' $ic criticism attempts to resol"e2 6e tas% of resol"ing
te crisis engendered in literar! te#ts is possible troug te formulationof some principles' parameters and paradigms $ic are tecnicall!
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
34/167
termed teories2 6eories are meant to interpret and e"aluate $or%s of
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
35/167
literature $it te mind of re"ealing te in&dept implications of suc
$or%s2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
6e structure put in place to re"eal te meaning of literar! te#t is literar!teor!2 G#plain2
3)3 The 0C!)-,e#t$ !" L#tea$ The!$ a%& C#t#'#()
According to 6err! Gagleton 9@@5)' tere are some students $ocomplain tat literar! teor! is impossibl! esoteric8 $o suspect it as an
arcane' elitist encla"e some$at a%in to nuclear p!sics2 It is true tat a
literar! education does not e#actl! encourage anal!tical tougt' but
literar! teor! is in fact no more difficult tan man! teoreticalen=uiries and a good deal easier tan some2
Some students and critics also protest tat literar! teor! gets in bet$een te reader and te $or%. 6e simple response to tis is tat$itout some %ind of teor!' o$e"er unreflecti"e and implicit' $e$ould not %no$ $at a literar! $or% $as in te first place' or o$ $e$ere to read it2 Eostilit! to teor! usuall! means an opposition to oter
peoples teories and obli"ion of ones o$n2
6!son ois 9@@;)' in an attempt to justif! te stud! of literar! teor!'raises some interesting =uestionsB $! sould $e boter to learn aboutliterar! or critical teoriesF Is it reall! $ort te troubleF Will all tose
abstract concepts not interfere $it ones natural and personalinterpretations of literatureF 6ese =uestions4 or ones li%e tem4 are
probabl! te =uestions most fre=uentl! as%ed b! ne$ students of criticalteor!' regardless of teir age or educational status2 iterar! teor! andcriticism offer us ne$ $a!s of tin%ing about literature and about $atare in"ol"ed in reading criticall!2
iterar! teor! and criticism is an una"oidable part of stud!ingliterature2 0ut teor! especiall! $en it ta%es te form of isms canoften be intimidating or else' fran%l!' boring. iterar! teor! andcriticism aim to e#plain' entertain4 stimulate and callenge te student of literature2 iterar! teor! and criticism ma%e literature refresing'informati"e and stimulating in man! $a!s2 iterar! teor! and criticismelp us to acie"e a better understanding of literature2 A better understanding of te $orld in $ic $e li"e' automaticall!4 comes along$en $e stud! literature' and te stud! of critical teor! ma%es tatenterprise e"en more producti"e2 iterar! teor! and criticism can' notonl! so$ us our $orld and oursel"es troug ne$ and "aluable lenses 4
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
36/167
but also strengten our abilit! to tin% logicall!' creati"el!' and $it a
good deal of insigt in anal!sing $or%s of literature2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Discuss o$ literar! teor! and criticism can elp readers acie"e better understanding of literature2
inall!' and most importantl! too' tere is in fact no literar! teor!4 inte sense of a bod! of teor! $ic springs from4 or is applicable to'literature alone2 :one of te teoretical approaces outlined in tis
course' from 4ar#ism4 structuralism and ps!coanal!sis' is simpl!concerned $it literar! $riting. On te contrar!' te! all emerged fromoter areas of te umanities and a"e implications $ell be!ond
literature itself2
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' attempt as been made to pro"ide an o"er"ie$ of te nature
and de"elopment of literar! teor! and criticism2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
37/167
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2ww w.unilorin.edu .ng/u!li"#$ i on% /balogun / D o "5. d & . Accessed
4a! 15t' 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'edi$ion. :e$ ?)2 I% $'ere # Te$ in $'i% Cl#%%0 T'e Au$'ori$) o&
In$erre$ie Co**uni$ie%. CambridgeB Ear"ard +ni"ersit! .ress2
r!e' :2 1?57)2 An#$o*) o& Cri$i"i%*, :e$ erse!B .rinceton+ni"ersit! .ress2
*raff' *erald2 1?>7)2 2ro&e%%ing Li$er#$ure- An In%$i$u$ion#l Hi%$or),CicagoB +ni"ersit! of Cicago .ress2
*riffit' Kell!.9@@9)2 3ri$ing E%%#)% A!ou$ Li$er#$ureB A *uide andSt!le Seet)2 6ompson Eeinle Incorporation2
entriccia' ran% . 1?>@)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 Gds)2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
38/167
,i"%in' ulie J ,!an' 4icael2 Gds)2 1??>)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An An$'olog). 4alden' 4assacusettsB 0lac%$ell2
6!son' ois2 9@@;).Cri$i"#l T'eor) Tod#)- A U%er riendl) Guide2
:e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
39/167
3.9 Distinction bet$een iterar! 6eor! and iterar!Criticism
/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!
;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
6is unit pro"ides a general definition of teor! and a specific definition
of literar! teor!2 It also attempts a distinction bet$een literar! teor!'
literar! istor! and literar! criticism.
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able to
• define teor! generall! and literar! teor! in particular
• distinguis bet$een literar! teor! and literar! criticism.
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 Mea%#%; a%& De"#%#t#!% !" L#tea$ The!$
According to *riffit' before 9@t centur!' tere $as little s!stematicattempt to interpret $or%s of literature' to probe teir meanings2 *riffitfurter contends tat *erald *raff' in 2ro&e%%ing Li$er#$ure 1?>7)' is
boo% on te istor! of literar! studies in iger education' noted tat before ten tere $as a $idespread assumption tat great literature $asessentiall! self&interpreting and needed no elaborate interpretation. 0utas %no$ledge increases' tere $as a sift in attitude to te metods of literar! teorising. In fact' b! te end of te 1?t centur!' uni"ersities
began to include courses in modern literature' and teacers and $riters began to gi"e serious attention to interpreting literature2
In Li$er#r) T'eor)- A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion 1???)' onatan Culler defines literar! teor! generall! as te s!stematic account of te nature
of literature and of te metods for anal!Hing it. Culler furter sa!stat
One of te most disma!ing features of teor!toda! is tat it is endless2 It is not someting tat
!ou could learn so as to %no$ teor!. It is anunbounded corpus of $ritings $ic is al$a!s
being augmented as te !oung and te restless4 incriti=ues of te guiding conceptions of teir
elders' promote te contributions to teor! of ne$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
40/167
tin%ers and redisco"er te $or% of older'
neglected ones2
In is boo% 4 An E%%#) on Cri$i"i%* 1?;;)' *raam Eoug distinguises
t$o categories of literar! teories2 6e first categor! e calls tee#trinsic teories and is concerned $it te moral nature of literature26eories in tis categor! primaril! empasise te total essence of
literature2 6e second categor! is $at e describes as te intrinsic
teories' $ic tal% about te formal nature of literature and more
specificall! $at it is2
6e intrinsicall! inclined criticism is a eterodiegetic judgment of
literature2 6is %ind of literar! teor! isolates a $or% of literature from
its e#ternal realit!2 6e aderents of tis classification see a te#t of
literature as a"ing no relationsip intended or implied $it its e#ternal$orld2 6at suc a $or% is in its o$n $orld2 6e critical teorists in
tis categor! are te ormalists' Structuralists and .ost&structuralists or
te Deconstructionists.
On te oter and' te e#trinsicall! inspired literar! teories tend to
associate a literar! piece $it its e#ternal $orld2 Eere' tere is a
departure from te isolationist pilosop! propounded b! te ideologues
of te intrinsicall! inclined criticism. ,ater' te e#trinsic criticism isomodiegetic meaning tat a $or% of literature is essentiall! i) a
representation of te spirit of te age and ii) a reflection of te $orldin $ic it operates2 It goes furter to see a te#t of literature as a productof te producers poets' no"elists' pla!$rigts and essa!ists)
imagination' "ision and sensibilit! in is-er e#ternal $orld2 Also' in
tis %ind of criticism4 te artist does not onl! focus on is e#ternalrealit! but e-se is inside te literar! production and creates a principal
caracter and oter caracters to carr! out is mission2 6e focus in tis
respect is for criticism to olisticall! in"estigate a piece of literature
$it te mind of a"ing a more practical judgment of te same2 4odernliterar! teories in tis categor! are .s!cological or .s!coanal!tical'
4ar#ist' eminist and .ost&colonialist criticism.
*enerall!' a teor! is a bod! of rules or principles used to appraise
$or%s of literature2 And on te oter and' literar! teor! critical
teor!)4 tries to e#plain te assumptions and "alues upon $ic "ariousforms of literar! criticism rest2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Discuss te importance of teor! to te stud! of literature2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
41/167
3)2 D#(t#%'t#!% .et/ee% L#tea$ The!$ a%& L#tea$C#t#'#()
iterar! teor! is a site of man! teories. iterar! teories $ere
de"eloped as a means to understand te "arious $a!s people readliterar! te#ts2 6e proponents of eac teor! belie"e teir teor! is $'e
teor!' but most of us interpret te#ts according to te rules of se"eral
different teories at a time2 All literar! teories are lenses troug $ic
$e can see te#ts2 6ere is noting to sa! tat one is better tan anoter
or tat !ou sould read according to an! of tem4 but it is sometimes funto decide to read a te#t $it one in mind because !ou often end up
$it a $ole ne$ perspecti"e on !our reading. 6o stud! literar! teor!is to see% to understand e#actl! o$ readers critics) interpret criticise)
te#ts' especiall! literar! ones2 4ost scolars toda! $ould agree tat
tere is no single meaning $aiting to be simpl! &ound in an! te#t24eaning is' rater' rodu"ed 4 tat is' it is a function of te differentinterpretati"e strategies $ic "arious readers bring to bear upon a te#t2
6us' a cardinal rule of modern literar! criticism could be summed up as
follo$sB $'e #n%wer%6 )ou ge$ &ro* # $e$ deend en$irel) uon $'e 7ind
o& 8ue%$ion%6 )ou u$ $o i$ 2 Strictl! spea%ing4 $en $e interpret aliterar! te#t' $e are doing literar! criticism4 but $en $e e#amine tecriteria upon $ic our interpretation rests' $e are appl!ing literar!teor!2 In oter $ords' literar! criticism is te application of critical
teor! to a literar! te#t' $eter or not a gi"en critic is a$are of te
teoretical assumptions informing is or er interpretation2 In fact' te$idespread recognition tat literar! criticism cannot be separated from
te teoretical assumptions on $ic it is based is one reason $! te
$ord "ri$i"i%* is often used as if it includes te $ord $'eor).
iterar! istor!' on its part' is te academic discipline $ic definedo$ literature $as taugt and studied from te 1>?@s on$ards2 As adiscipline' it grounds its scientific and social legitimac! in te positi"ististor! of te late 1?t centur!2 As a istorical genre concerned $it te
metod of establising facts' it e#tends te application of te reliabletools of classical and medie"al pilolog! to modern literature2 iterar!istor! relates literature to te social' political' moral' and intellectuallife of a nation' personalit! or period2 iterar! istor! is not e#pected toreduce $or%s of literature to arci"al documents' but to generate a
proper e"aluati"e discourse and e#plain $! certain $or%s' $ic $ecall classics' still affect us and become' so to spea% 4 immortal' $ileoters do not sur"i"e teir o$n times' etc2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Eo$ is literar! teor! different from literar! criticismF
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
42/167
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' $e defined te terms teor! and literar! teor!2 We said
tat $ile a teor! is a bod! of rules or principles used to appraise$or%s of literature literar! teor! on te oter and is te s!stematicaccount of te nature of literature and of te metods for anal!sing it.
4)9 SUMMARY
6is unit defined a teor! as a bod! of rules or principles used to
appraise $or%s of literature4 $ile literar! teor! critical teor!)4 on itso$n' tries to e#plain te assumptions and "alues upon $ic "arious
forms of literar! criticism rest2 We also made a distinction bet$een
literar! teor! and literar! criticism. We said tat $en $e interpret aliterar! te#t' $e are doing literar! criticism4 but $en $e e#amine tecriteria upon $ic our interpretation of a te#t rests' $e are appl!ing
literar! teor!2
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
Discuss te importance of teor! to te stud! of literature2
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
Abrams' 4.E2 1?53)2 T'e Mirror #nd $'e L#*. ondonB O#ford +.2
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2
www.unilorin.edu.ng/u!li"#$i on%/balogun / Do "5. d & . Accessed4a! 15
t4 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'
edi$ion. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
43/167
Culler' onatan2 1??7)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion.O#fordB O#ford +ni"ersit! .ress2
During4 Simon2 Gd.)2 1???)2 T'e Cul$ur#l S$udie% Re#der . ondonB
,outledge2
Gagleton' 62 1??;)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An In$rodu"$ion( Se"ond Edi$ion.4inneapolisB 6e +ni"ersit! of 4innesota .ress2
is' Stanle!2 1?>?)2 I% $'ere # Te$ in $'i% Cl#%%0 T'e Au$'ori$) o& In$erre$ie Co**uni$ie%. CambridgeB Ear"ard +ni"ersit! .ress2
r!e' :2 1?57)2 An#$o*) o& Cri$i"i%*, :e$ erse!B .rinceton
+ni"ersit! .ress2
*raff' *erald2 1?>7)2 2ro&e%%ing Li$er#$ure- An In%$i$u$ion#l Hi%$or),
CicagoB +ni"ersit! of Cicago .ress2
*riffit' Kell!.9@@9)2 3ri$ing E%%#)% A!ou$ Li$er#$ureB A *uide andSt!le Seet)2 6ompson Eeinle Incorporation2
Eoug' *2 1?;;)2 An E%%#) on Cri$i"i%*4 ondonB *erald Duc%$ortand Co2 td2
entriccia' ran% . 1?>@)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 Gds)2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
44/167
UNIT 3 WHY STUDY LITERARY THEORY:
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"e3.< 4ain Content
3.1 W! Stud! iterar! 6eor!F/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)
7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
As $e e#plained in te last unit' te term literar! teor! $itin te
discipline of literar! studies' can be best understood as te set of
concepts and intellectual assumptions on $ic rests te $or% of
e#plaining or interpreting literar! te#ts2 Gssentiall!' teor! in literaturerefers to te $a!s of loo%ing at literature be!ond te t!pical plot&teme
and caracter&setting studies2 onatan Culler 1??7) in Li$er#r) T'eor)-
A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion olds tat teor! in literature refers to te principles deri"ed from internal anal!sis of literar! te#ts or from
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
45/167
%no$ledge e#ternal to te te#t tat can be applied in multiple
interpreti"e situations2 4.E2 Abrams points out in T'e Mirror #nd $'e L#* 1?53) tat Lan! reasonabl! ade=uate teor! ta%es some account
of 2 . . four elements.M 6ese elements areB
12 6e $or% itself
92 6e artist $o creates te $or% 32 6e uni"erse or te nature tat is being imitated b! te $or%
/2 6e audience of te $or%
6ese elements are diagrammaticall! so$n belo$B
iterar! teor!' Abrams olds' can be di"ided into four categoriesBmimetic teories' $ic focus on te relationsip bet$een te#t and
uni"erse b! uni"erse e means all tings of te $orld apart fromaudience' te#t and autor)8 pragmatic teories' $ic are interested in
te relationsip bet$een te#t and audience8 e#pressi"e teories' $ic
are concerned $it te te#t,autor relationsip8 and objecti"e teories'te most recent classification' $ic focus on anal!sis of te te#t in
isolation2 0ecause noting e#ists oter tan uni"erse' te#t' autor and
audience' an! form of teor! must fit into one of tese four categories'
or be a combination of se"eral2 or Abrams' tere are autor&based
teories' reader&based teories' te#t&based teories' and teories tat propose te te#t as imitati"e of te uni"erse2 or instance' $en Cinua
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
46/167
Acebe argues tat osep Conrads T'e He#r$ o& D#r7ne%% fails to
grant full umanit! to te Africans it portra!s4 e $as arguing from te perspecti"e of post&colonial literar! teor! $ic empasises a istor!
of e#ploitation and racism. In an attempt to pro"ide a pointed meaning
of teor! in literature' ide 0alogun contends tatB
6e tas% of resol"ing te crisis engendered inliterar! te#ts is possible troug te formulationof some principles' parameters and paradigms$ic are tecnicall! termed teories2 6eoriesare meant to interpret and e"aluate $or%s of literature $it te mind of re"ealing te in&dept implications of suc $or%s2
6is unit e#plains $! te stud! of literar! teor! and criticism isin"aluable2
2)9 OBJECTIVE
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• e#plain $! te stud! of literar! teor! and criticism is
important in
literature.
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 Wh$ Stu&$ L#tea$ The!$:
iterar! teor! and literar! criticism are interpreti"e tools tat elp us
tin% more deepl! and insigtfull! about te literature tat $e read2
iterar! teor!' specificall!4 refers to te set of principles e"ol"ed for te e"aluation of $or%s of literature2 O"er time' different scools of
literar! criticism a"e de"eloped' eac $it its o$n approaces to teact of reading. It is important tat students stud! literar! teor! andcriticism because bot offer different $a!s of interpreting $or%s of
literature2 Gac teor! offers itself as te most or te onl!) accurate
means of understanding uman e#perience2 In man! instances'ad"ocates of te most popular teories of te da! usuall! recei"e te
acclamation and respect2 Eo$e"er' e"en $itin te ran%s of an! gi"en
critical teor! tere are countless disagreements among practitioners
tat result in te emergence of different scools of tougt $itin a
single teor!2 In fact' te istor! of e"er! literar! teor! is' in effect' te
istor! of an ongoing debate among its o$n ad"ocates as $ell as anongoing debate $it te ad"ocates of oter teories2 6us' literar!
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
47/167
teor! and criticism $ill elp !ou in Ltin%ing teoreticall!4M tat is' toseeing te assumptions' $eter stated or not' tat underlie e"er!
"ie$point2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
G#plain o$ bot literar! teor! and criticism offer different $a!s of understanding a literar! te#t2
)9 CONCLUSION
We a"e e#plained in tis unit tat literar! teor! refers to a particular
form of literar! criticism in $ic particular academic' scientific' or
pilosopical approac is follo$ed in a s!stematic fasion $ile
anal!sing literar! te#ts2 In oter $ords' literar! teorists adapt s!stemsof %no$ledge de"eloped largel! outside te realm of literar! studies for
instance4 pilosop! or sociolog!) and impose tem upon literar! te#tsfor te purpose of disco"ering or de"eloping ne$ and uni=ue
understandings of tose te#ts2 rom te foregoing4 $e a"e establisedtat literar! teor! is an indispensable tool $ic critics use to realise
te goal of sensitising and educating te audience2 6at' b! implication'
suggests tat te difficult! often encountered in a literar! te#t is often
resol"ed b! subjecting it to a particular teoretical anal!sis' using te
frame$or% of a particular teor!2
4)9 SUMMARY
In tis unit' !ou learnt tat literar! teor! refers to a set of principlese"ol"ed for te e"aluation of $or%s of literature2 6is unit also stated
tat literar! teor! is an indispensable tool $ic critics use to realise
te goal of sensitising and educating te reading audience2 6is' b!
implication' suggests tat te difficult! often encountered in a literar!
te#t is often resol"ed b! subjecting it to a particular teoretical anal!sis'
using te frame$or% of a particular teor!2
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
6e istor! of e"er! critical teor! is' in effect' te istor! of an
ongoing debate among its o$n ad"ocates as $ell as an ongoing debate
$it te ad"ocates of oter teories2 Discuss2
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
Abrams' 4.E2 1?53)2 T'e Mirror #nd $'e L#*. ondonB O#ford +.2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
48/167
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2ww w.unilorin.edu .ng/u!li"#$ i on% /balogun / D o "5. d & . Accessed
4a! 15t' 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'edi$ion. :e$ @)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 Gds)2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
49/167
,icter' Da"id E2 Gd.)2 1??>)2 T'e Cri$i"#l Tr#di$ion- Cl#%%i" Te$%#nd Con$e*or#r) Trend%. 0edford 0oo%sB 0oston.
,i"%in' ulie J ,!an' 4icael2 Gds.)2 1??>)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An
An$'olog). 4alden' 4assacusettsB 0lac%$ell2
6!son' ois2 9@@;).Cri$i"#l T'eor) Tod#)- A U%er riendl) Guide2 :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
50/167
Since te era of .lato and Aristotle' pilosopers' scolars and $riters
a"e tried to create a more precise and disciplined $a!s of anal!singliterature2 iterar! criticism flourised in Gurope and America $it suc
literar! giants li%e I. A. ,icards and 2 ,2 ea"is as te fore&runners2G"en in contemporar! criticism' bot men are still "er! mucrecognised and respected2 In fact' ,icards and ea"is $ere te
teoreticians of literature for se"eral decades2 6e! $ere te do!ens of
critical tougt in Gurope and America2
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• discuss te importance of literar! criticism to te stud! of
literature2
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 The Natue a%& Mea%#%; !" L#tea$ C#t#'#()
According to te Rou$ledge Di"$ion#r) o& Li$er#r) Ter*% 9@@;)' to
criticise' et!mologicall!' means to anal!se and later' to judge2
Critical teor! in itself can be distinguised from criticism4 since it
concerns itself $it te formulation of concepts. It is a pilosopicalacti"it! $ic sould underlie criticism but' again' sould not be
regarded as part of it2 iterar! teor! refers to a set of principles
e"ol"ed for te e"aluation of $or%s of literature2 6ere is no single
approac to te criticism of literature2 Criticism is a formal discourse'
and tere are so man! approaces to it' !et tese approaces are not
e#austi"e but represent te most $idel! used contemporar!
approaces2
iterar! criticism refers to te anal!sis and judgment of $or%s of
literature2 It tries to interpret specific $or%s of literature and also elpsus to identif! and understand different $a!s of e#amining and
interpreting tem2 6e stud! of literar! criticism contributes to
maintenance of ig standards of literature2 In our da!&to&da! life' te
stud! of criticism of literar! $or%s enables us to become a$are of te
present and past $or%s of literature2 Criticism also enables $riters to
understand te factors tat affect te =ualit! and caracter of literar!
$or%s and in tis $a! impro"e teir abilit! to produce better $or%s2
iterar! criticism allo$s us to see tings from different perspecti"es2 Itallo$s us to gain a far $ider insigt into a $or% of literature tan from
our o$n perspecti"e2 6at $a!' $e gain a greater understanding of te$orld in $ic $e li"e2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
51/167
In addition' literar! criticism elps readers de"elop critical tin%ing
s%ills2 iterar! criticism is not an abstract intellectual e#ercise2 It is anatural uman response to literature2 6e discipline of literar! criticism
is noting more tan discourse&spo%en or $ritten&about literature2 It is a b!&product of te reading process2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Discuss te importance of literar! criticism to te stud! of literature2
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' !ou learnt te definition of literar! criticism as $ell as te
importance of literar! criticism to te stud! of literature2 6e critic
anal!ses and e"aluates $at a $riter as $ritten2 Ee comments on ande"aluates te =ualit! of bot te autors literar! composition and is
"ision of or insigt into uman e#perience.
4)9 SUMMARY
We also stated tat ere is no single approac to te criticism of literature2 In addition' $e stated tat a literar! critic approaces a $or% according to establised codes' doctrines or aestetic principles2 Ee is amediator bet$een te $or% and te reading public2 Ee can arouse
entusiasm in te reader and can as $ell %ill tat entusiasm.
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
12 Wat is literar! criticismF
92 Discuss te role of te literar! critic2
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
Abrams' 4.E2 1?53)2 T'e Mirror #nd $'e L#*. ondonB O#ford +.2
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2
www.unilorin.edu.ng/u!li"#$i on%/balogun / Do "5. d & . Accessed4a! 15
t4 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'
edi$ion. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
52/167
Culler' onatan2 1??7)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion.O#fordB O#ford +ni"ersit! .ress2
During4 Simon2 1???)2 T'e Cul$ur#l S$udie% Re#der . Gd)2 ondonB,outledge2
Gagleton' 62 1??;)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An In$rodu"$ion( Se"ond Edi$ion.4inneapolisB 6e +ni"ersit! of 4innesota .ress2
is' Stanle!2 1?>?)2 I% $'ere # Te$ in $'i% Cl#%%0 T'e Au$'ori$) o& In$erre$ie Co**uni$ie%. CambridgeB Ear"ard +ni"ersit! .ress2
r!e' :2 1?57)2 An#$o*) o& Cri$i"i%*, :e$ erse!B .rinceton
+ni"ersit! .ress2
*raff' *erald2 1?>7)2 2ro&e%%ing Li$er#$ure- An In%$i$u$ion#l Hi%$or),CicagoB +ni"ersit! of Cicago .ress2
*riffit' Kell!.9@@9)2 3ri$ing E%%#)% A!ou$ Li$er#$ureB A *uide andSt!le Seet)2 6ompson Eeinle Incorporation2
Eoug' *2 1?;;)2 An E%%#) on Cri$i"i%*4 ondonB *erald Duc%$ortand Co2 td2
entriccia' ran% . 1?>@)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. Gds)2 :e$ )2 Modern Li$er#r) T'eor)- A Re#der . /t ed.)2 :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
53/167
UNIT 4 FUNCTIONS OF LITERARY CRITICISM
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content
3.1 unctions of iterar! Criticism/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!
;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
In te last unit' $e stated tat to criticise' et!mologicall!' meant to
anal!se and later' to judge. iterar! criticism offers ne$ $a!s oftin%ing about literature and about $at is in"ol"ed in reading criticall!2In tis unit' $e sall attempt to identif! te functions of criticism to te
understanding of literar! te#ts2
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• state te functions of criticism in te stud! of literature
• appl! te paradigms discussed in !our o$n critical $ritings2
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 Fu%'t#!%( !" L#tea$ C#t#'#()
6o stud! literar! criticism is to see% to understand e#actl! o$ readerscritics) interpret criticise) te#ts' especiall! literar! ones2 4ost scolars
toda! $ould agree tat tere is no single meaning $aiting to be simpl!
&ound in an! te#t2 4eaning is' rater' rodu"ed 8 tat is' it is a function of
te different interpretati"e strategies $ic "arious readers bring to bear
upon a te#t2 A cardinal rule of modern literar! criticism ma! be summed
up as follo$sB $'e #n%wer%6 )ou ge$ &ro* # $e$ deend en$irel) uon
$'e 7ind o& 8ue%$ion%6 )ou u$ $o i$ . 6e upsot of all tis is tat tesame te#t legitimatel! means different tings to different people2 As a
result' for e#ample' a 4ar#ist critic $ould necessaril! come up $it a
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
54/167
different interpretation from tat of a .s!coanal!tic critic of te samete#t' eac of $ic is e=uall! "alid pro"ided tat tere is te#tuale"idence to support te interpretation in =uestion)2 6e primar!necessit! for literar! criticism lies in te fact tat Lne$ strategies of
interpretation of literature are constantl! being de"eloped to cope $itte comple#ities of cange in literar! traditionsM2
6e importance of literar! criticism terefore resides in its secondar!
but in"aluable role of interpretation2 Criticism deals $it anal!sing'
classif!ing4 e#pounding and e"aluating a $or% of art in order to formones opinion2 Serious literar! criticism is bot e"aluati"e and
anal!tical' tereb! elping us to better a literar! $or% . Writing on terole of literar! criticism4 I.A. ,icards notes tat Lte critical reading of
poetr! prose and drama) is an ardours discipline2 6e lesson of all
criticism is tat $e a"e noting to rel! upon in ma%ing our coices' butoursel"es.M
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Wat does serious literar! criticism doF
iterar! criticism begins te "er! moment !ou close te boo% and begins to reflect on $at as been read2 6us' criticism includes te
process of reflecting on' organising and articulating !our response to a
gi"en literar! $or%2 Criticism presupposes tat a piece of literaturecontains relationsips and patterns of meaning tat te critic can discern
and sare after reading a te#t2 It also presupposes tat te critic as te
abilit! to translate is e#perience of te $o% into intellectual terms tat
can be communicated to and understood b! oters2 Again' literar!criticism presupposes tat te critics e#perience of te $or% once
organised and articulated' $ill be compatible $it te e#perience of
oter readers2 6is means tat to be "alid and "aluable' te criticsreading of a $or% must accord' at least in some $a!s' $it $at oter
intelligent readers' o"er a reasonable period of time are $illing to agree
on and accept2
In conclusion' as a student of literar! criticism' some of te =uestions to
as% !ourself includeB
• Am I reading a literar! te#t in order to measure o$ accurate its
representation of realit! isF
• Am I reading a literar! te#t for insigts into te life and mind ofits $riterF
• As te reader' is m! role passi"e or acti"eF
• is meaning simpl! found in a literar! te#t or is it constructedor produced b! te readerF
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
55/167
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
earn te =uestions to as% !ourself and tr! to recall tem after putting
!our course material aside2
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' !ou learnt tat to stud! literar! criticism is to see% tounderstand e#actl! o$ readers critics) interpret criticise) te#ts'
especiall! literar! ones2 0! no$' !ou sould a"e understood tat
meaning in a literar! te#t is rodu"ed 8 tat is' it is a function of te
different interpretati"e strategies $ic "arious readers bring to bear
upon a te#t2
4)9 SUMMARY
iterar! criticism deals $it anal!sing' classif!ing4 e#pounding ande"aluating a $or% of art in order to form ones opinion2 A cardinal rule
of modern literar! criticism ma! be summed up as follo$sB $'e#n%wer%6 )ou ge$ &ro* # $e$ deend en$irel) uon $'e 7ind o&
8ue%$ion%6 )ou u$ $o i$ . 6is implies tat te same te#t legitimatel!means different tings to different people2 As a result' for e#ample' a4ar#ist critic $ould necessaril! come up $it a different interpretation
from tat of a .s!coanal!tic critic of te same te#t' eac of $ic ise=uall! "alid pro"ided tat tere is te#tual e"idence to support teinterpretation in =uestion)2
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
12 Wat is literar! criticismF92 Discuss te role of te literar! critic2
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
Abrams' 4.E2 1?53)2 T'e Mirror #nd $'e L#*. ondonB O#ford +.2
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2
www.unilorin.edu.ng/u!li"#$i on%/balogun / Do "5. d & . Accessed4a! 15
t4 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'edi$ion. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
56/167
Cilds' .eter J o$ler' ,oger 9@@;)2 T'e Rou$ledge Di"$ion#r) o&
Li$er#r) Ter*%. ,outledgeB +SA.
Culler' onatan2 1??7)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion.O#fordB O#ford +ni"ersit! .ress2
During4 Simon2 Gd.)2 1???)2 T'e Cul$ur#l S$udie% Re#der . ondonB,outledge2
Gagleton' 62 1??;)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An In$rodu"$ion( Se"ond Edi$ion.4inneapolisB 6e +ni"ersit! of 4innesota .ress2
is' Stanle!2 1?>?)2 I% $'ere # Te$ in $'i% Cl#%%0 T'e Au$'ori$) o&
In$erre$ie Co**uni$ie%. CambridgeB Ear"ard +ni"ersit! .ress2
r!e' :2 1?57)2 An#$o*) o& Cri$i"i%*, :e$ erse!B .rinceton+ni"ersit! .ress2
*raff' *erald2 1?>7)2 2ro&e%%ing Li$er#$ure- An In%$i$u$ion#l Hi%$or),
CicagoB +ni"ersit! of Cicago .ress2
*riffit' Kell!.9@@9)2 3ri$ing E%%#)% A!ou$ Li$er#$ureB A *uide andSt!le Seet)2 6ompson Eeinle Incorporation2
Eoug' *2 1?;;)2 An E%%#) on Cri$i"i%*4 ondonB *erald Duc%$ortand Co2 td2
entriccia' ran% . 1?>@)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 Gds)2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
57/167
UNIT 5 THE RELATIONSHI= BETWEEN THE
LITERARY CRITIC AND THE WRITER
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content
Writer 3.1 6e ,elationsip bet$een te iterar! Critic and te
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
58/167
/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
iterar! criticism ta%es te reader to a iger le"el of cogniti"e tougt
b! e"aluating $at te critic sa!s' and ten appl!ing it to te piece of literature in $a!s tat te reader ma! not a"e originall! tougt2
6e literar! critic is concerned $it $at te $riter as tried to sa! in
is $or% and o$ successful e as been able to e#press it2 or instance'
te formalist critic is interested in 'ow an autor e#presses an idea'
$ile te 4ar#ist critic is interested in w'#$ an autor is tr!ing to
e#press2 6o a certain degree' a literar! critic sould be con"ersant $itliterar! istor! to be able to ma%e a genuine judgement upon a $or% of
literature2 Ee sould be a$are of $at oters a"e said and must be
grounded in literar! teor!2 It is important to note tat literar! critics
a"e borro$ed from oter disciplines suc as antropolog!' ps!colog!'
linguistics' ps!colog! and pilosop! to anal!se $or%s of literature
more percepti"el!2
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• discuss te role of te critic and te relationsip bet$een te
literar! critic and te $riter
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 The Re,at#!%(h#- .et/ee% the L#tea$ C#t#' a%& the
W#te
6e literar! critic gi"es life to a literar! te#t b! bringing out te iddenmeanings embedded in te $or% . 4ost often' it is troug te e!es of te cautious critical reader tat $e e"aluate te success or oter$ise of ate#t2 6e critic anal!ses and e"aluates $at a $riter as $ritten2 Eecomments on' and e"aluates te =ualit! of bot te autors literar!composition and is "ision of' or insigt into uman e#perience2 It
sould be noted tat a critic does not prescribe $ic realities are "alid'
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
59/167
but identifies te nature of te indi"idual e#perience and te aesteticmeans used to e#press tat e#perience2 6e underl!ing implication is
tat it is not te tas% of te critic to set up or frame prescriptions $ic
$riters must conform to2 A literar! critic approaces a $or% according
to establised codes' doctrines or aestetic principles2 Ee is a mediator
bet$een te $or% and te reading public2 Ee can arouse entusiasm in
te reader and can as $ell %ill tat entusiasm.
*enerall!' despite teir tendenc! to interpret4 rater tan to e"aluateliterature' literar! critics a"e an enormous effect on te literar!
mar%etplace' not in terms of $at te! sa! about particular $or%s but in
terms of $ic $or%s te! coose to interpret and $ic $or%s te!ignore2 And of course' critics tend to interpret $or%s tat lend
temsel"es readil! to te critical teor! te! emplo!2 6us' $ene"er a
single critical teor! dominates literar! studies' tose $or%s tat lend
temsel"es $ell to tat teor! $ill be considered Lgreat $or%sM and $ill
be taugt in te college classroom4 $ile oter $or%s $ill be ignored2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Discuss te role of te literar! critic2
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' !ou learnt tat te literar! critic is concerned $it $at te$riter as tried to sa! in is $or% and o$ successful e as been able
to e#press it2 or instance' te formalist critic is interested in 'ow an
autor e#presses an idea' $ile te 4ar#ist critic is interested in w'#$ an
autor is tr!ing to e#press2
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
60/167
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2
www.unilorin.edu.ng/u!li"#$i on%/balogun / Do "5. d & . Accessed4a! 15
t4 9@132
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'
edi$ion. :e$ @)2 A&$er $'e New Cri$i"i%*. CicagoB +ni"ersit!of Cicago .ress2
4oore&*ilbert' 0art Stanton' *aret' J 4ale! Will!2 1??7)2 2o%$"oloni#l Cri$i"i%*. Gds)2 :e$ )2 Modern Li$er#r) T'eor)- A Re#der . /t ed.)2 :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
61/167
,icter' Da"id E2 Gd.)2 1??>)2 T'e Cri$i"#l Tr#di$ion- Cl#%%i" Te$%#nd Con$e*or#r) Trend%. 0edford 0oo%sB 0oston.
,i"%in' ulie J ,!an' 4icael2 1??>)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- An An$'olog)2
Gds)2 4alden' 4assacusettsB 0lac%$ell2
6!son' ois2 9@@;).Cri$i"#l T'eor) Tod#)- A U%er riendl) Guide2 :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
62/167
MODULE 2 THEORIES OF LITERATURE 617
+nit 1 4imetic 6eor! of Arts
+nit 9 ormalist 6eor! and Criticism+nit 3 :e$ Criticism+nit / Structuralist Criticism
+nit 5 Semiotics+nit ; .ost Structuralism
+nit 7 Deconstruction
UNIT 1 MIMETIC THEORY OF ARTS
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content
3.1 Origin and 0ac%ground of 4imetic 6eor! of iterature3.9 Central 6enets of te 4imetic 6eor!3.3 A Criti=ue of te 4imetic 6eor! of Art
/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)
7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTROODUCTION
6e mimetic teor! of arts $as among te first to be defined2 It
originated from Aristotles 3>/ 0C&3990C) conception tat art
imitates' reproduces or recreates great and lo$ actions2 Eere' great
actions refer to traged!4 and lo$ actions refer to comed!2 6e mimeticteor! is also %no$n as Art as Imitation2 4imesis' te *ree% $ord for
imitation' as been a central term in aestetic and literar! teor! since
.lato2 It is te earlier $a! to judge an! $or% of art in relation to realit!'$eter te representation is accurate or not2 6oug tis mode starts
from .lato' it runs troug man! great teorists of ,enaissance up to
some modern teorists as $ell2 42 E2 Abrams defines imitation as a
relational term, signif!ing t$o items and correspondence bet$een tem24imesis is te idea tat art imitates realit!' an idea tat traces bac% to
Aristotle $o argued tat te uni"ersal can be found in te concrete2
4imesis is de"eloped and applied troug mimetic teories of literature'
teatre and te "isual arts during te ,enaissance and te Gnligtenment periods2 .ilosopers and $riters including Aristotle' .lato' 4oliere'
Sa%espeare' ,acine' Diderot and ,ousseau applied te mimetic teor!of literar! criticism to teir $or% and li"es2 6e mimetic teor! is te
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
63/167
uni"ersal foundation of literature and of scools of literar! criticism.6e concern for te moral effects of art is often dra$n from mimeticteor!2 6e goal of mimetic criticism is to determine o$ $ell a $or% of literature connects $it te real $orld2 4imetic criticism also arguestat art con"e!s uni"ersal truts instead of just temporal and indi"idual
truts2
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• discuss te postulations of te mimetic teor! of literature
• criti=ue te postulations of te mimetic teor! of Art
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 O#;#% a%& Ba'>;!u%& !" M#)et#' The!$ !" L#teatue
6e *ree% mimetic scool of criticism is based upon te ideas e#pressed b! .lato and Aristotle2 .lato regards te artist as an imitator of
imitations8 te painters $or% is trice remo"ed from te Lessential
natureM of a tingB te artist imitates te p!sical object' $ic is a faint
cop! of ideas of te ting. .lato claims tat ordinar! art effects badl! on
te audience because it represents imagination rater tan trut' andnourises teir feeling rater tan reason2 .lato opines tat artists lac%
creati"e po$er2 Art is essentiall! mimicr! of nature2 .aintings aresupposed to loo% Ljust li%e te real tingM etc2 Arguabl!' it is te oldest
and most $idel! eld "ie$ on te nature of art. .lato belie"ed tat art isessentiall! an imitation of nature2 6erefore' according to .lato' art is at
bestB
1) useless8 and9) .otentiall! dangerous2
.lato is con"inced tat Lte artsM form a natural grouping and tat te!all sare a common formB L6at $ic all and onl! Arts a"e incommon b! "irtue of $ic $e recognise eac to be an art and b! "irtueof $ic eac is an art.M or im4 art $as useless because it ser"es nouseful purpose in societ!2 As an Imitation of :ature' it adds no%no$ledge no in$elle"$u#l "alue)2
Aristotle' on te oter and' treats imitation as a basic uman facult!'
$ic e#presses itself in a $ide range of arts2 or im4 to imitate is not
to produce a cop! or mirror reflection of some tings but in"ol"es acomple# mediation of realit!2 or e#ample' in traged! te $riter imitates
peoples actions rater tan teir caracters2 or im4 tis $orld is real
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
64/167
but incomplete so poet endea"ors to complete it troug te imitation2
6us' poets are bot imitators and creator2
3)2 Ce%ta, Te%et( !" the M#)et#' The!$ !" L#teatue
Aristotle' te proponent of te mimetic teor! of art' olds tat art
imitates te realit! e#isting in us and in te concrete objects around us2
Eo$e"er' it sould be noted tat art does not merel! imitate te flu# and
confusion tat confront man8 rater it imitates te necessar! or probable
conse=uences of gi"en persons in gi"en situations,e"en of imaginar! persons and situations2
Drama for instance' imitates men in action2 According to Aristotle'
mimesis is men in action' teir caracters' deeds' passions' and
e#periences $ile poetic imitation is an imitation of te uman inner
action2 Indeed' te main trust of mimesis is tat certain poems simpl!
tell $at appens and oters drama) actuall! imitate $at appens2 6e
artist' tat is' imitates realit! b! suppressing accidental irrele"ances and
b! eigtening te essential $ic is oter$ise onl! imperfectl! realised
in concrete objects2
4imetic critics as% o$ $ell te $or% of literature accords $it te real$orld2 6e! anal!se te accurac! of a literar! $or% and its moralit!26e! consider $eter or not it so$s o$ people reall! act' and$eter or not it is correct2 6e mimetic critic assesses a literar! $or% troug te prism of is or er o$n time' judging te te#t according tois o$n "alue s!stem.
Aristotles 2oe$i"%4 also %no$n as LOn te Art of ImitationM4 is animportant te#t on te stud! of art as imitation2 4imesis is concerned
primaril! $it te object imitated or reproduced and also te medium of
imitation2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
12 0riefl! e#plain te mimetic teor! of literature.92 Discuss te major propositions of te mimetic teor! of
literature2
3)3 A C#t#?ue !" the M#)et#' The!$ !" At
One of te major criticisms le"elled against te mimetic teor! of art istat it fails to recognise te importance of imagination in literar!
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
65/167
creati"it!2 Also' te negati"e side of mimetic criticism occurs $en tecritics subjecti"e bias leads to dogmatic condemnation and censorsip2
4an! $or%s oter$ise labelled aesteticall! great a"e been
blac%listed' banned or burned trougout te istor! of uman%ind b!
moral critics2
or .lato' Art $as potentiall! dangerous for se"eral reasonsB
A)2 Art is essentiall! decepti"eB te $ole aim of art $as to decei"e2
Success $as acie"ed $en te spectator mistoo% an imitation for
realit!2 urtermore' artists $ere unconcerned $it facts-trut2 It made
no difference to artists or to te success of teir $or%s $eter te
images or stories te! depict $ere real or teir messages true or good2
0) Art is ps!cologicall! de&stabilisingB uman e#istence is' in great part' a struggle to master te emotions and sensual urges b! using reason
and intellect according to .lato2 6erefore art $as dangerous and
counterproducti"e to tis end i.e2 rational self ,master!) since it appeals
not to reason and intellect' but to te ps!cological forces $ic
constantl! tr! to o"ertro$ reason' namel! passion and emotion2 or
im4 .oetr! feeds and $aters te passions instead of dr!ing tem up8
se lets tem rule' altoug te! ougt to be controlled' if man%ind is
e"er to increase in appiness and "irtue
C) Art leads to immoralit!2 Art is unconcerned $it moralit!'
sometimes e"en teacing immoral lessons2 4oralit!' it $ould seem4 as
noting to do $it a $or%s success as art. .lato $orries tat suc art
$ould encourage immoralit! in te citiHens of te state2 .eople migt
uncriticall! accept and admire immoral' "icious traits $en te! are
attracti"el! pac%aged b! s%illed artists distinction bet$een trut and
illusion- p!sicians and coo%s- eat and cosmetics- beaut! and
glamour)2 i%e a s%illed cef' artists are onl! interested in pleasing te
palate' e"en if it poisons te dinner2 Since mimetic art is institutionall!
di"orced from trut' goodness or an! concern $it real beaut!' it
creates an en"ironment of superficial fla"ours $ere all sorts of
atrocities can be made to seem a tempting confection2
D)2 Art $as politicall! dangerous' a treat to te common good2 Similar
to te point made earlier' .lato $orried tat strong art $ic appeals to
emotions stirs up negati"e emotions $ic societ! tries to control2 0ut
tis is more tan just a problem for te indi"idual2 or a people $it a
istor! of mania4 strong4 emotion&stirring art is rigtl! seen as a treat
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
66/167
to te good of state-communit!2 It $as' terefore correctl! te concern
of go"ernment2 or .lato' "iolence and se# in te media is capable of
causing us to be more "iolent' or entrenc se#uall! obsessed culture2
6is affects not just te people $o consume te "iolent images' but te
entire communit! of $ic te! are a part.
Eo$e"er' Aristotle' $o $as .latos most famous student and greatest
critic' ad a dissenting "ie$2 Disagreeing $it muc else tat .lato said'
Aristotle agreed tat art $as essentiall! a 4imesis2 0ut' e maintained'
good) art $as neiter useless nor dangerous' but rater natural and
beneficial2 It is natural because it is natural for uman beings to imitate2
An! uman societ! $ic is ealt! $ill be a societ! $ere tere is
imitati"e art2 :oting is more natural tan for cildren to pretend2 Art
production and training is a necessar! part of an! education since it usesand encourages te imaginati"e manipulation of ideas2 :oting is more
natural tan for uman beings to create using teir imagination2
urtermore' Aristotle olds tat art is not decepti"e because artists
must accuratel! portra! realit! to be successful2 Drama' for instance'
must accuratel! portra! ps!cological realit! in order for caracters to
be belie"able and teir actions understandable2 Again' art teaces
effecti"el! and it teaces te trut2 Con"incing and po$erful drama is
con"incing and po$erful because it re"eals some trut of uman nature2
Aristotle agreed tat art did stir up negati"e emotions but' e claims itten purged tese in a armless' ealt! $a! troug $at e calls tedoctrine of LCatarsis2
)9 CONCLUSION
4imetic teor! comes from te *ree% $ord mimesis4 $ic meansimitation and representation' and it states tat people are influenced b!
eac oter and te $orld around tem4 $en creating' in man! different$a!s2 Since .lato applied te mimetic teor! on literature and separated
it from narrati"e' mimesis as been gi"en a "er! clear literar! meaning2.lato sees te artist as an imitator of te p!sical $orld around im'
$ic' according to im4 is alread! an imitation of te idea people a"eof tis $orld2 So basicall! e claims tat a $riter imitates te imitations
and represents imagination and emotion muc more tan reason and
realit!2 or tis reason' according to .lato' mimesis affects te readers
negati"el! b! misleading tem.
Aristotle disagrees $it .lato in te sense tat for im to imitate te p!sical $orld is not just to cop! it but rater to adapt it2 According to
Aristotles reception of te mimetic teor!4 imitation is needed tocomplete tis incomplete p!sical $orld people li"e in2 0ut imitation' as
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
67/167
e sees it' is rater a comple# creation' a s%ill tat needs to go and&in&
and $it talent and imaginati"e po$er .
4)9 SUMMARY
6e mimetic teor! of arts $as te first to be defined2 It originated from
Aristotles conception tat art imitates' reproduces or recreates great and
lo$ actions2 Eere' great actions refer to traged! and lo$ actions refer to
comed!2 6e mimetic teor! is also %no$n as Art as Imitation2
In tis unit' $e stated tat Aristotle' te proponent of te mimetic teor!of art' olds tat art imitates te realit! e#isting in us and in te concreteobjects around us2 Aristotles 2oe$i"%4 also %no$n as LOn te Art of ImitationM4 is an important te#t on te stud! of art as imitation2 4imesisis concerned primaril! $it te object imitated or reproduced and alsote medium of imitation2
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
Attempt a criti=ue of te 4imetic 6eor! of Art as espoused b! .lato
and Aristotle2
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
Aristotle2 9@@;)2 2oe$i"%2 oe Sacs trans.)2 ocus .ilosopicalibrar!B .ullins .ress2
0lamires' E2 1??1)2 A Hi%$or) o& Li$er#r) Cri$i"i%*, ondonB
4acmillan .ress td2
Cilds' .eter J o$ler' ,oger 9@@;)2 T'e Rou$ledge Di"$ion#r) o&
Li$er#r) Ter*%. ,outledgeB +SA.
Culler' onatan2 1??7)2 Li$er#r) T'eor)- A .er) S'or$ In$rodu"$ion.O#fordB O#ford +ni"ersit! .ress2
Dada' ..O 1??/)2 iterar! Criticism and African iterature2 In OluObafemi Gd.) New In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure, IbadanB
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
68/167
Wellec%' ,ene J Warren' Austin2 1?73)2 T'eor) o& Li$er#$ure2
4iddlese#B .enguin 0oo%s imited2
UNIT 2 FORMALIST THEORY AND CRITICISM
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content
3.1 6e Origin of ormalism3.9 0asic .rinciples and 4ain Interpretati"e Strategies of ormalism
3.3 Criticisms against ormalism/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!
;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
69/167
1)9 INTRODUCTION
ormalism is a branc of te teor! of art for arts sa%e . ormalistteor! regards literature as a uni=ue form of uman %no$ledge tat needs
to be e#amined on its o$n terms. It olds tat literature sould assert itsautonom! de"oid of etics or politics. In teir influential boo% entitledT'eor) o& Li$er#$ure 1?73)4 ,ene Welle% and Austin Warren old tatte natural and sensible starting point for $or% in literar! scolarsip is
te interpretation and anal!sis of te $or%s of literature temsel"es. 6oa formalist4 terefore' a poem or stor! is not primaril! a social4 istorical4or biograpical document8 it is a literar! $or% tat can be understood onl!
b! reference to its intrinsic literar! features4 tat is' tose elements foundin te te#t itself2 6o anal!se a poem or stor!4 terefore' te formalist
critic focuses on te $ords of te te#t rater tan facts about te autorslife or te istorical milieu in $ic it $as $ritten. 6e critic pa!s specialattention to te formal features of te te#t(te st!le4 structure4 imager!4tone4 and genre.
6ese features4 o$e"er' are usuall! not e#amined in isolation4 becauseformalist critics belie"e tat $at gi"es a literar! te#t its special status as
art is o$ all its elements $or% togeter to create te readers total
e#perience. Art for arts sa%e is a mo"ement tat appeals to a pureaestetic element of form.
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• trace te de"elopment of formalist teor!
• discuss te teoretical assumptions of formalism• e#amine te criticisms against formalist teor! and criticism
3)9 MAIN CONTENT
3)1 O#;#% !" F!)a,#()
or ma l is m o r i gin ate d in ,us si a i n 1 ?1 5 $ it t efounding of te Mo%"ow Lingui%$i" Cir"le and in te follo$ing !ear 41?1;4 of its St..etersburg counterpart' Oo9#: Mu%7oi$e%2 6e major actors in
tis critical scool includeB Nictor S%lo"s%!' ,oman a%obson4
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
70/167
0oris Gi%enbaum4 Osip 0ri% 4
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
71/167
particular $or%s4 autors biograp!4 istor!4 politics' pilosop!'etc are torougl! e#cluded from literar! anal!sis. iterature as anindependent e#istence4 and formalism attempts to create anindependent science $ic studies specificall! literar! material.
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Wat is te goal of formalismF
ormalism e#cludes all mimetic and e#pressi"e definitions of literature. or formalists4 literature is not seen as te e#pression of an autors personalit! and $orld&"ision' or as a realistic mimetic)
representation of te $orld in $ic e li"ed2 6is is because in
reading te literar! te#t as an instrument of e#pression or
representation' te specificit! of its literar! =ualities is li%el! to be
o"erloo%ed. ormalism empasises te independent e#istence of literar! studies2
ormalism olds tat literature is different from all oter materials
because it tends to defamiliarise objects8 tat is4 ma%e tings strange2It refreses our sense of life and e#perience2 Art defamiliarises
tings tat a"e become abitual or automatic2 6e familiar is madestrange in art. .ractical e"er!da! language is made strange in poetr!
because te effect of poetr! is to ma%e language obli=ue4 difficult4
attenuated or tortuous.
G"en te p!sical sounds of $ords temsel"es become unusuall!
prominent2 6is defamiliarised perception of $ords' $ic inordinar! circumstances $e fail to notice is te result of te formal
basis of poetr!. ormalists belie"e tat poetic speec does not differ from ordinar! speec just because it ma! include construction
different from e"er!da! language and $ord,order in"ersions4 but because its formal de"ices r!me and r!tm) act on ordinar! $ords
to rene$ our perception of tem2
SELF*ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Wat does LdefamiliarisationM mean to formalistsF
3)3 A C#t#?ue !" F!)a,#()
A lot of criticisms a"e been le"elled against te f ormalist teor!
of art2 or instance' it does not assign an! significance to teautor 4 te $orld outside4 or e"en tougt. :o recognition is gi"en
to te relation bet$een te#t and realit! $ic are %e! elements insome oter critical teories2 or te formalists' literature as noting to
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
72/167
do $it "ision or $it autorial meaning2 A gi"en $or% of art is onl! part of te general bod! of literature4 not a part of te personalit! of itsautor2 ormalist critics tell us tat te empasis in practical language
is on te referent and te realit! referred to2 G"er! oter ting4 sucas r!me or alliteration' is onl! secondar! to te purpose of te
communication. 0ut in poetic language4 referentialit! is irrele"ant'and te empasis is on te means of e#pression itself . 0ecause of tis'a poetic utterance as no functionalities $it te real conte#t in $ic it
is produced and cannot be assumed to refer to an! aspect of its
producers e#istence.
anguage in poetr! does not point to an object be!ond itself2 It is
entirel! self&sufficient and autonomous. Wat is important is not teautor' but literariness2 iterature does not refer to an!ting in te
$orld of realit!8 it does not reflect tat $orld2 Indeed' literar! te#ts
ma%e familiar tings to become strange2 It dislocates our abitual perceptions of te real $orld so as to ma%e it te object of a rene$ed
attention. ormalism unearts te formal mecanisms $ereb! tiseffect of defamiliarisation is produced. S%lo"s%! argued tatliterature creates a "ision of te object instead of ser"ing as a
means of %no$ing it. In poetr!4 te de"ices of poetr! are s tudied notfor temsel"es4 but for teir capacit! to ma%e objects strange. Imager!'!perbole4 parallelism comparison' and repetition all bring aboutdefamiliarisation2
Anoter criti=ue against formalist critical teor! is tat it does not
recognise te traditional dicotom! bet$een orm and Content. It isinterested onl! in orm. 6raditionall!4 form $as considered to be a %indof decorati"e supplement $ile content is te tougt or idea. orm$as considered to be a "essel into $ic content could be poured2 6is
same form $as tougt capable of recei"ing a "ariet! of differentcontents2 If te form canged' it $as at te instance of content2 6e
empasis $as put on content2 ormalist teor! re"ersed te priorit! of
content o"er form and e#clusi"el! promoted te importance of form
o"er content2 Content ten becomes dependent on form2 Content doesnot a"e an! separate from independent e#istence in literature2 :o
amount of literar! anal!sis can distil content from form2 orm itself is
determined' not b! content' but b! moter forms2 orm predetermines
content2
SELF ASSESSMENT E+ERCISE
Discuss te major criticisms against formalist critics2
Wit te rise of 4ar#ism in ,ussia in te 1?3@s' formalism $as dri"enout of literar! discourse in Stalinist +SS,8 ence te formalists see
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
73/167
4ar#ist critics as teir literar! or ideological enemies. 6e formalistteor! tat literature is a special realm to be distinguised from tesocial and political $orld) clearl! stands in direct opposition to te
4ar#ist belief tat literature cannot be understood apart from its
istorical conte#t2 0ecause of its empasis on structure or language'
formalism as inspired or gi"en rise to oter language, basedteories of literar! criticism2 One of suc critical perspecti"es is
Structuralism4 $ic $ill be e#amined in subse=uent unit.
)9 CONCLUSION
In tis unit' !ou learnt tat formalist criticism de"eloped and flourised
in ,ussia in te middle of te 9@t centur!2 6o te formalists' a $or% of
literature is percei"ed as being autotelic in te sense tat suc is Lself&
complete' $ritten for its o$n sa%e' and unified b! its formM2 erome0eat! et al 9@@9)2 6e interpretation of tis is tat form metods'
de"ices' etc) used to present ideas in a $or% of literature is e#alted more
tan content teme)2 rom te ormalists standpoint' a $or% of literature is e"aluated on te basis of its literar! de"ices and te
susceptibilit! of te same to scientific in"estigation2 6e critics concern
terefore is to identif! and discuss tose de"ices in order to determine
te literariness of suc a te#t ide 0alogun' 9@11)2
4)9 SUMMARY
In tis unit4 !ou a"e been taugt tat formalist criticism regardsliterature as a uni=ue form of uman %no$ledge tat needs to be
e#amined on its o$n terms. ormalist critics belie"e tat $at gi"es aliterar! te#t its special status as art is o$ all its elements $or% togeter to create te readers total e#perience. A %e! metod tat formalists useto e#plore te intense relationsips $itin a poem is close reading4 acareful step, b!&step anal!sis and e#plication of a te#t. 6e purpose of close reading is to understand o$ "arious elements in a literar! te#t
$or% togeter to sape its effects on te reader . Writing about tesortcoming of formalist criticism' ide 0alogun opines tat te critical
practice of te ormalists needs a furter appraisal because of its loss of
te organic essence of literature2 6is is so because a $or% of literature
is a representation of a central idea or teme $ose interpretation is
dependent on te different elements tat contribute to its fulfilment and
meaning. It $ould not be possible for Wole So!in%as T'e Tri#l% o& ;ro$'er
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
74/167
onl! on tis aspect of a te#t is a mere pursuance of sado$ at te
e#pense of substance2
5)9 TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT 6TMA7
12 Discuss te major concerns of te formalist critics2
92 ist some of te allegations le"elled against formalism.
8)9 REFERENCES9FURTHER READING
0alogun' ide2 Approaces to 4odern iterar! 6eories2
ww w.unilorin.edu .ng/u!li"#$ i on% /balogun / D o "5. d & .
0eat!' 2 et al2 9@@9)2 T'e Nor$on In$rodu"$ion $o Li$er#$ure( +$'
edi$ion. :e$
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
75/167
UNIT 3 NEW CRITICISM
CONTENTS
1.< Introduction
9.< Objecti"es3.< 4ain Content3.1 6e Gmergence of :e$ Criticism3.9 4ain Interpretati"e Strategies of :e$ Criticism
/.< Conclusion5.< Summar!;.< 6utor&4ar%ed Assignment 64A)7.< ,eferences-urter ,eading
1)9 INTRODUCTION
:e$ Criticism is a product of some American uni"ersities in te 1?3@sand /@s2 It stresses a close reading of te te#t itself2 As a strateg! of reading4 :e$ Criticism "ie$s te $or% of literature as an aesteticobject independent of istorical conte#t and as a unified $ole tatreflects te unified sensibilit! of te artist2 :e$ Criticism aims at
bringing a greater intellectual rigour to literar! studies' confining itself to careful scrutin! of te te#t alone and te formal structures of parado#'ambiguit!' iron!' and metapor' among oters2 6e :e$ Critics arefired b! te con"iction tat teir readings of poetr! $ould !ield a
umanising influence on readers and tus counter te alienatingtendencies of modern' industrial life2 In Cri$i"#l T'eor) Tod#)- A U%er
8/20/2019 ENG 415.doc
76/167
riendl) Guide( ois 6!son 9@@;) submits tat :e$ Criticismdominated literar! studies from te 1?/@s troug te 1?;@s and as left
a lasting imprint on te $a! $e read and $rite about literature2 Some of
its most important concepts concerning te nature and importance of
te#tual e"idence(te use of concrete' specific e#amples from te te#t
itself to "alidate our interpretations( a"e been incorporated into te
$a! most literar! critics toda!' regardless of teir teoretical persuasion'
support teir readings of literature2 or te :e$ Critics' toroug
te#tual support is needed for literar! interpretations2
6o full! appreciate :e$ Criticisms contribution to literar! studiestoda!' $e need to remember te form of criticism it replacedB te
biograpical&istorical criticism tat dominated literar! studies in te
1?t centur! and te earl! decades of te 9@t2 At tat time4 it $ascommon practice to interpret a literar! te#t b! stud!ing te autors lifeand times to determine #u$'ori#l in$en$ion4 tat is' te meaning teautor intended te te#t to a"e2 6e autors letters' diaries and essa!s$ere combed for e"idence of autorial intention as $ereautobiograpies' biograpies and istor! boo%s2 In its most e#tremeform4 biograpical&istorical criticism seemed4 to some' to e#amine tete#ts biograpical&istorical conte#t in%$e#d of e#amining te te#t2 InAmerica' te :e$ Critics called teir literar! interpretation Lclosereading.M
In tis unit' !ou are going to learn some of :e$ Criticisms
contributions to literar! studies and te teoretical frame$or% tat
underlies teir interpretation2 Some oter teories li%e reader&response
criticism and structuralism stand in opposition to :e$ Criticism.
2)9 OBJECTIVES
At te end of tis unit' !ou sould be able toB
• trace te de"elopment of :e$ Criticism
•
�