Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Energy Systems Institute Siberian BranchRussian Academy of Sciences
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Annualizedeconomicbenefit, $Bln./year
Investmentbenefit, $ Bln.
Capacitybenefit, GW
Fuel benefit, $Bln./year
24.4
77.3
65.5
10
10
Russia (Siberia) China (North)
11
2012 2035
12
-20 0 20 40 60 80
-0.2
2.1537.25 7.4-0.6 19.5
Russia (Siberia, Far East)
Mongolia
China (North, Northeast)
DPRK
RoK
Japan
13
-10000 -5000 0 5000 10000 15000 20000
-25
137
-6234 1467399
14240
Russia (Siberia, FarEast)Mongolia
China (North,Northeast)DPRK
RoK
14
15
Transmission Transfer capabilities, GW
Length, km Investment , Bln.USD
Russia - Mongolia 8.9 1250 3.7Russia (Siberia) –China
4.1 2000 2.1
Russia (Far East)–China
10.7 1200 2.9
Russia – DPRK 3.3 1700 0.9Russia – Japan 5.3 2000 (including
cables – 220) 7.7
China – Mongolia 8.2 1400 2.1China – DPRK 15 450 2.7DPRK – RoK 15 250 2.7RoK – Japan 15 900 (including
cables – 250)14.3
Total 85.5 11150 (including cables – 470)
39.1
05
1015
2025303540
Russia China DPRK RoK Japan
16
Political diversity of the countries involved in power interconnection◦ it requires to reach a consensus on formation of
prospective directions of the electricity cooperation and to take concerted political decisions jointly to mitigate the tension
Dependence of countries-participants on external electricity supply◦ it is needed careful preparation and strict
implementation of the relevant international legislation, comprehensively regulating the behavior of the parties, in particular under the normal and force majeure conditions
17
Necessity to accord national energy and power strategies and plans, energy legislation and technical standards in power industry with other countries of the region◦ particular coordinating tools should be developed
NEA grid expansion◦ in the beginning, bilateral, trilateral inter-country
cooperation and agreement conclusions ◦ than, bilateral, trilateral cooperation with its
coordination within entire NEA region◦ at last, NEA-wide multilateral cooperation and
agreements conclusion
18
Power system interconnections in NEA region can provide system benefits for countries-participants
Realization of the system benefits supposes a extensive mutual power exchange/trade among NEAcountries, with transmission of variable over time (byhour of day, season of the year) or stable power flows
Extended and costly interstate power transmission infrastructure is needed to provide power trade in the NEA region
Many political issues should be addressed the NEA grid to be in place
19