Upload
votu
View
220
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Brussels, September 24th 2010
ENERCON wind farms integration into power systems -Future of ancillary system services Eckard Quitmann, ENERCON GmbH, Department Sales-Technical Support
2Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
• WFs that shall be legally and commercially independent entities, need individual “Points of Connection” (PoC)even if they share infrastructure, e.g. substation
• Electrical criteria apply to all at PoC
Point of Connection (PoC)Reference point for wind farm controls
PoC WF AMV
MV
MV
400V
400V
400V
WF A
no PoC !MV
MV
MV
400V
400V
400V
WF B
PoC WF B
3Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Point of Connection (PoC)Reference point for wind farm controls
PoC WF AMV
MV
MV
400V
400V
400V
WF A
MV
MV
MV
400V
400V
400V
WF B
PoC WF B
, no matterif WECs are located Onshore or Offshore
• WFs that shall be legally and commercially independent entities, need individual “Points of Connection” (PoC)even if they share infrastructure, e.g. substation
• Electrical criteria apply to all at PoC
4Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON TechnologyConcept: Gearless drive and variable speed
GENERATION
ControlsStator
Rotor
Generator: Rectifier
Excitation
Yaw DrivesPitch Drives
5Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
UPS (optional)
Control cabinet
Inverters
Transformer
MV-Switchgear
LV-Switchgear
CONVERSION
ENERCON TechnologyConcept: Full scale power electronics
Level 2
Level 0
Level 1
6Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON TechnologyStructure electrical system
Circuit Breaker
=≈
InverterDC-Link
=≈
Rectifier UnitTransformer
Constant grid frequency
Variable speed
==
Excitation Controller
RG
Ring Generator
=≈
UPS Chopper
ControlSystem
Filter
7Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON TechnologyStructure electrical system
Circuit Breaker
=≈
InverterDC-Link
=≈
Rectifier UnitTransformer
==
Excitation Controller
Ring Generator
=≈
UPS Chopper
ControlSystem
Filter
RG
• Grid performance of the ENERCON WEC is determined by the inverters!• The inverter is essentially a controlled source of current.• The individual WEC controls the power factor (or reactive power) but not the voltage. • Voltage control on Wind Farm level on request (in Belgium mandatory if PWF>25MW)
8Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
With UVRT Option:Up to 5 seconds per event
With Undervoltage Ride Through Option: Up to 5 seconds per event
max. 60
sec.
fR
Operation RangesFrequency and voltage
Frequency f [Hz]
fR + 7 Hz
fR - 7 Hz
100%
Voltage U [% UR]
110% 120%90%80%
Normal continuous operation
145%0%
9Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
P
t
Flexible active power Limitation
ENERCON Technology Active Power Control
The full scale power electronics allow a fast and flexible continuous control of the active power at each individual ENERCON WEC.
• Performance achieved by piching the WEC blades.• Activated based on an online signal from the system operator.• Little additional investment in WF necessary (for online communication).• Yield relevant => Usually only for emergencies
10Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Future needs of the power system Contribution of WECs during frequency disturbances
For wind energy, requirements about power and frequency shall distinguish between:
• Incidents of overfrequency versus underfrequency
• Permanent requirements (minutes, hours) versus temporary (sec)
• Frequency disturbances during strong wind versus low wind
Basic: All modern WECs operate with variable speed, designed for max. active power generation at any time at all wind speeds.
Consequence: If any dependency Power = f(Frequency) is desired, it has to be implemented “artificially”through the control of the WEC.
11Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON Technology Power reduction for overfrequency incidents
1. Overfrequency:
- Relatively easy to respond to, WEC must reduce active power
f > fn
• Performance achieved by piching WEC blades.• Activated based on local frequency measurement.• No additional investment in WF necessary.• Yield relevant => Usually only for emergencies with f > 50,x Hz
Pelectric = f(frequency)
P(f) curve is adjustable
12Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON Technology Inertia Emulation for underfrequency incidents
Optional active power boost, using the inertia of the rotor.
Pboost = 10%Prated
Available as soon as Pactual ≥ 4%Prated
Pboost fully available within 800ms
Boost for max. 10 seconds
Recovery time after boost = 2 x Tboost
2. Underfrequency: Pactual Pref
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950kW
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0
s
• Performance achieved by changing excitation, using rotor inertia.• Activated based on local frequency measurement.• Additional investment in WF necessary.• Cost relevant => Economical value for the power system?• Impact to the max. installable wind power?
13Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Q export
Prated
Q import
Q/Prated: 50% 33% 0 33% 50%
International requirements PQ-Range for wind power plants
UK Spain
No minimum range defined, but
economical bonus if 0,95exp < cosϕ > 0,95imp
is possible
Germany France ERDF RTE
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V
400V400V
400V400V
400V
Q export
Prated
Q import
Q/Prated: 50% 33% 0 33% 50%
Q export
Prated
Q import
Q/Prated: 50% 33% 0 33% 50%
shape slightly depending on
PoC voltage level
Conclusions
- PQU range must be well defined by TSO/DSO
- A Q-requirements is different from a cosϕ
- Area near P=0 must be adressed
- Separately to define how PQ- range shall be used during steady state operation
Q export
Prated
Q import
Q/Prated: 50% 33% 0 33% 50%
?
14Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Belgian requirement “RTF”PQ-Range
Typical PQ-range of a thermal power plant
Pminimum due to thermal process
+0,45 … - 0,1Prated
Conventional power plants:
- have a technical minimum of activepower generation, usually 20…50%Prated
- below that they are not obliged to be ableto deliver or absorb reactive power in therange +0,45 … - 0,1PratedEspecially not at P≈0!
Q export Q import
_PratedP
15Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Belgian requirement “RTF”PQ-Range for wind power plants
Q export Q import
Prated
+0,45 … - 0,1Prated
Wind power plants:
-Technical minimum is P≈0
- Obligation to range Q=+0,45 … - 0,1Pratedfrom P=0…Prated would mean:
a) STATCOM (100t€/Mvar !) or
b) Fix C and L devices. Their on/off switching is negativefor the grid voltage stability.
400V
400V
400V
Reasonable PQ-requirement for power plants
Pminimum and exact shapeto be defined
16Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Q
PThe ENERCON WEC itself has no need for reactive power, can operate at unity power factor.
Depending on type and configuration, each WEC has a capability to provide or to absorb reactive power.
Full reactive power capability between20% and 100% Prated
STATCOM Option: Full reactive power output between 0% to 100% active power => Reactive power output is independent from windspeed
Supports the system stability like a STATCOM without an additional FACTS device => potential cost savings
Reactive power resp. voltage control may be paid in some markets as an ancillary service
FACTS Capabilities of Wind Energy Converters ENERCON PQ range and STATCOM Option
1 p.u.+/- 0,5 p.u.
17Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Future Belgian requirement “RTF”PQ-Range for wind power plants
Q export Q import
Prated
+0,45 … - 0,1Prated
Reasonable PQ-requirement for power plants
Pminimum and exact shapeto be defined
• Present ELIA transmission grid requirements cause high additional investment in WF• Minimum reactive power requirements are already in discussion at ELIA• Capbank/Reactor, SVCs and STATCOM have different technical value for the power system• Reasonable requirements for low wind speed conditions?• Q-Capabilities beyond the minimum should be remunerated additionally (range and quality) !
Example, not final !
18Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Present Fault-Ride-Through requirements in Belgium
• Present Belgium transmission + distribution grid requirements for FRT are very moderate• Distrib. grid: Even „only“ 200ms voltage dip down to 0,7pu requires full FRT capability of a WEC• Transmission grid: FRT capability is mandatory. But what performance is best during the fault ?
Measurement example of an ENERCON E-70 E4 running at 2MW / 3-phase fault
Active Power P [MW] Reactive Power Q [Mvar]
19Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Example from actual grid code requirementsGermany
Requirement: The wind farm has to provide a reactive current during faults to support the system voltage.
The amount is dynamically depending on the actual voltage level!
Gradient dQ/dUadjustable
Extract from
Verordnung zu Systemdienstleistungen durch Windenergieanlagen
(Systemdienstleistungsverordnung – SDLWindV) of 27.05.2009
20Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
ENERCON UVRT Reactive current according to voltage dip (QUM)
Voltage dip down to 72% Urated
Half of max. reactive current: 50% Irated
Voltage [V] Reactive current [kA]
Voltage dip down to 50% Urated
Maximum reactive current: Irated
Voltage [V] Reactive current [kA]
21Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
relatively “lo
w” technical require
ments
Technical suggestions how to define techncial minimum requirements for to optimize grid integration
Voltage level at point of connectionUnominal < 70kV 70kV ≤ Unominal < 220kV Unominal ≥ 220kV
Scc/PWF > X= strong point of
connection
Scc/PWF < X= weak point of
connection
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
relatively high te
chnical require
ments
Reasonable technical re
quirements also in
“middle” fie
lds
to be defined by th
e system operator
22Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Technical suggestions how to define techncial minimum requirements for to optimize grid integration
Conclusions:
1. The power system shall have the maximum technical benefit from new wind farms, no matter if located onshore or offshore
2. General technical criteria and what is the minimum requirement must be defined
3. Investment into to wind power plants depends on the technical minimum requirement
4. Reasonable technical minimum requirements may depend on the point of connectionand need to be determined by the system operator
5. Exceeding technical minimum requirements should have economical benefit for the wind farm owner – as it also has for the power system
relatively “
low” technical require
ments
Voltage level at point of connectionUnominal < 69kV 69kV ≤ Unominal ≤ 138kV Unominal > 138kV
Scc/PWF > X= strong point of
connection
Scc/PWF < X= weak point of
connection
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
relatively high te
chnical require
ments
Reasonable technical re
quirements in
“middle” fields
to be defined by th
e system operator
relatively “
low” technical require
ments
relatively “
low” technical require
ments
Voltage level at point of connectionUnominal < 69kV 69kV ≤ Unominal ≤ 138kV Unominal > 138kV
Scc/PWF > X= strong point of
connection
Scc/PWF < X= weak point of
connection
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
Criteria FRT:
Criteria PQ:
relatively high te
chnical require
ments
Reasonable technical re
quirements in
“middle” fields
to be defined by th
e system operator
23Sales - Technical Support, March 12th 2010© ENERCON GmbH 2010
Thank you !
Questions?