Upload
lee-perkins
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Endwall Contouring, Using Continuous Diffusion Technology, A Breakthrough Technology and its Application to a Three-Stage
High Pressure Turbine
Introduced byTurbomachinery Performance and Flow Research Laboratory,
Texas A&M University
Sponsored by DOE, National Energy Technology Laboratory
Efficiency Improvement by Endwall Contouring
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Pressure difference between suction and pressure side causes:
•Systems of secondary vortices•Generation of induced drag forces•Total pressure reduction•Secondary flow losses•Efficiency decrease
Introduction: Endwall Secondary Flow, Reduction
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Breakthrough Technology, Disclosure of Invention TAMUS 3259
Unlike methods available in the literature, the Continuous Diffusion
Technology introduced by TPFL is physics based and can be applied to
P, IP, and LP turbines and compressors regardless the load coefficient,
flow coefficient and degree of reaction. Details are explained in the
ASME paper GT2011-45931 Presented at the ASME-IGTI-Turbo-Expo
2011, June 06-10, 2011, Vancouver, Canada
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
TPFL Research Turbine Used for Endwall Contouring Research
A Three-stage Turbine Rotor with two Independent Coolant Flow Loops
Mainstream Flow
Rotor-Seal Ejection Cooling
Platform Discrete Hole Film Cooling
Tow Independent Coolant Loops for Coolant Injection from Stator-Rotor Seal and Downstream Film Cooling
Holes
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Numerical Methodology
Steady state models used, convergence was assessed through monitoring of:
Equation RMS and maximum residual values Inlet and exit mass flow Area-averaged pressure and velocity at turbine exit
Turbulence model
Shear Stress Transport (SST) model CFX Automatic wall treatment employed
Switches between wall functions to a low-Reynolds number near wall formulation
Requires y+<2, and at least near-wall nodes
Boundary conditions Ptin, Ttin, Pb Fixed rotation speed Adiabatic and non-slip conditions on the wallTPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research Laboratory
Texas A&M University
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Numerical Simulation Mesh
Rotor mesh has over 2 million elements Extensive grid sensitivity tests Wall regions use 22 nodes The entire model involves over 9 million elements
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Blade Loading of Second Rotor
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Blade Loading at Hub
pinew
pitarget
piref
Target Pressure Range
Nomalized axial chord
Pre
ssu
re[P
a]
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
80000
82000
84000
86000
reference casenew contouring
Geometry needs to be further optimized.
Geometry needs to be further optimized
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Blade Loading of Second Rotor
Pressure distribution at two different span locations
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Geometry needs to be further optimized.
Blade Loading at Hub Blade Loading at 2% SpanRad distance from hub
1.3 mm
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Continuous Diffusion Technology Applied to Endwall sign
The design of contouring considers both the direction of streamlines and pressure gradient near hub. Currently there is no positive portion.
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Pressure Distribution at Hub
Comparison of pressure distributions
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
reference case partial contouring extended
new contouring
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
Total Pressure Loss Coefficient for Second Rotor
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Normalized span
Pt
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
reference casenew contouring
Mass-Averaged Total Pressure Loss Coefficient at x=1.07Cax
Project DE-FOA-0000031ASME-IGTI-2011
June 06-10
TPFL: The Turbomachinery Performance and Flow Research LaboratoryTexas A&M University
M. T. Schobeiri
Efficiency Improvement Using New Technology
From Literature
TPFL Conventional Designs