Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Empty Slide
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20170008931 2020-07-12T17:28:23+00:00Z
Investigation of
Desiccants and CO2 Sorbents
for Advanced
Exploration Systems
2016-2017James C. Knox
and
Gregory E. Cmarik
Background – 4BMS• 4BMS = 4-Bed Molecular Sieve
system• CDRA is the variant in use on the ISS
• Concerns over performance and reliability
• The present CO2 sorbent material
can no longer be manufactured
• Final selection criteria:
• Remove 4 kg CO2/day at 2 torr
• No shutdowns due to dust
• Integrated “closed-loop” operation
CO2
Sorbent
CO2
Sorbent
Desiccant
CO2 outHC2
HC1
HC2
Schematic Overview of 4-BMS operation
HC1 = Half-Cycle no.1
Power and CoolingWater Inputs
CO2 Product to Regenor Overboard
Humid Air + CO2
Humid Air + CO2
Humid Air
Humid Air
Cabin Air In
Cabin Air Out
Cabin Air Out
Cabin Air In
HC2 = Half-Cycle no.2
CO2 outHC1
Desiccant
Sorbent Selection and Characterization• Collaborative effort among the CO2 removal teams at MSFC/ARC/JSC
• Multiple aspects to study on these materials:
• Pellet integrity
• Adsorption performance
• Fault tolerance and recovery
• This is a summary of recent results as well as previously presented work:• Single Pellet Crush, Bulk Crush, Attrition, and Hydrothermal Stability tests
• Pure Component CO2 Isotherms and Water Vapor Isotherms at 0 to 200°C
• CO2 Isotherms on Water Preloaded Samples at 25 to 100°C
• CO2 Breakthrough Measurements
• Thermal Profiles for Adsorption Performance Recovery
• Cyclic CO2 Adsorption Performance
• Layered Desiccant Breakthrough Comparison
Sorbent Structural Reliability
Sorbent Structural Tests
• Criteria: Match or exceed ASRT in structural performance metrics• No material was as robust in Single Pellet Crush as ASRT
• Several exceeded ASRT in Bulk Crush and Attrition testing
• Two prime candidates are Grade 544 13X and BASF 13X• Other sorbent options that passed the 2016 downselect: VSA-10 LiLSX, APGIII 13X, Grade 522 5A
Taller is better Taller is better Shorter is better
Hydrothermal Stability Testing
• The testing with the HST system has correlated very strongly with flight data on sorbent degradation.
• ASRT is presently operating for over 2 years without incident while RK-38 failed within 6 months.
• Numerous options to outperform ASRT and RK-38
Gra
de 5
44 (1
3X)
Gra
de 5
44 C
(13X
)
VSA
-10
(LiLSX)
BAS
F 13X
(13X
)
Gra
de 5
14 (4
A)
BAS
F 5A (5
A)
APG
-III (
13X)
Gra
de 5
22 (5
A)
Gra
de 5
64 (3
A)
Polym
er-IE
X (L
iLSX)
UI-9
4 (4
A)
NSA-7
00 (L
iLSX)
ASR
T (5A)
RK-3
8 (5
A)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Incre
ase in P
ressure
Dro
p (
Pa/1
000 h
r)
Water Vapor
-90oC (Dry)
-21oC
Increase in Pressure Drop across HST Bed Assembly
per 1000 Hours of Cyclic Operations
Adsorption Performance
Pure Isotherm Measurement• Collaboration with Ames
Research Center• Pure Component CO2 and Water Vapor
Isotherms
• Measured data encompasses all conditions
found in 4BMS operation
• Data fit to a 3-site Langmuir
model• High precision for interpolation in computer
simulations
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
0.000 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
Up
take
(m
ol H
2O
/kg)
Water Vapor Pressure (kPa)
Water Vapor Isotherms - Grade 544 13X
25 C data 35 C data 50 C data 70 C data 100 C data
25 C fit 35 C fit 50 C fit 70 C fit 100 C fit
Lines are generated from an isotherm model.Test data is shown with markers.
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000
Up
take
(m
ol H
2O
/kg)
Water Vapor Pressure (kPa)
Water Vapor Isotherms - Grade 514 4A
25 C data 25 C fit 35 C data 35 C fit
50 C data 50 C fit 70 C data 70 C fit
Lines are generated from an isotherm model.Test data is shown with markers.
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Up
take
(m
ol C
O2
/kg)
Carbon Dioxide Pressure (kPa)
Carbon Dioxide Isotherms - Grade 544 13X
0 C data 0 C fit 10 C data 10 C fit 25 C data 25 C fit 50 C data
50 C fit 75 C data 75 C fit 100 C data 100 C fit 125 C data 125 C fit
150 C data 150 C fit 175 C data 175 C fit 200 C data 200 C fit Henry's Law
Lines are generated from isotherm model.Test data is shown with markers.Henry's Law behavior is shown as an aid.
Huang, R., Belancik, G., Jan, D., Cmarik, G., Ebner, A. D., Ritter, J., and Knox, J. C. "CO2 Capacity Sorbent Analysis using Volumetric Measurement Approach," 47th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Charleston, 2017.
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Up
dat
e (m
ol
CO
2/k
g)
Carbon Dioxide Pressure (kPa)
Carbon Dioxide Isotherms - APGIII 13X
0 C data 0 C fit 10 C data 10 C fit 25 C data 25 C fit50 C data 50 C fit 75 C data 75 C fit 100 C data 100 C fit125 C data 125 C fit 150 C data 150 C fit 175 C data 175 C fit200 C data 200 C fit Henry's Law
Mixture Isotherm Measurement• A custom instrument built by Rubotherm was used to obtain
CO2/H2O mixture isotherms• Samples are loaded with water vapor during a timed, continuous operation
• Preloading is not intended to reach equilibrium
• Preloading is determined by the change in mass observed with a microbalance
• CO2/He mixtures are prepared in a mixing loop and measured with a GC
• The prepared mixture is circulated across the sample
• The composition of the gas phase is sampled again after circulation
• No water is observed to desorb at temperatures of 25, 50, 75, and 100°C
• Measurements at 175°C show small, measurable quantities of desorbed water
• Comparisons made to reference data show:• Good agreement to dry isotherms
• Disagreement to the preloaded isotherms. This is attributed to the activation temperature achievable in that work
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
9.0
3.4
1.0
2.19
1.581.08
1.01
0.65
Upta
ke (
mol C
O2
/kg)
CO2 partial Pressure (kPa)
Water Preloaded CO2 Adsorption:
Grade 544 13X at 25oC
Dry
Rubotherm:
Reference:
Water Preload
(mol H2O/kg)
0.01 0.1 10.1
1
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.00.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
9.0
3.4
1.0
2.00
0.96
Upta
ke (
mol C
O2
/kg)
CO2 partial Pressure (kPa)
Water Preloaded CO2 Adsorption:
Grade 544 13X at 50oC
DryRubotherm:
Reference:
Water Preload
(mol H2O/kg)0.1 1
0.1
1
Huang, R., Belancik, G., Jan, D., Cmarik, G., Ebner, A. D., Ritter, J., and Knox, J. C. "CO2 Capacity Sorbent Analysis using Volumetric Measurement Approach," 47th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Charleston, 2017.
Wang, Y., and LeVan, M. D. "Adsorption Equilibrium of Binary Mixtures of Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor on Zeolites 5A and 13X," Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data Vol. 55, No. 9, 2010, pp. 3189-3195.
Breakthrough Measurement
• Centerline sampling capabilities were added to the
existing CBT• Centerline concentration measurements provide experimental data for fitting
of kinetic parameters such as an LDF constant
• Measurements made with both a GC and an optical sensor (when available)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.00.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Bed Temperatures and Water Vapor Concentrations
Breakthrough - Grade 544 13X
Wate
r V
apor
Part
ial P
ressure
(kP
a)
Time (hrs)
Gas Inlet
Gas Outlet Centerline
Gas Outlet Bulk
Center TC
End TC
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Tem
pera
ture
(oC
)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
CO
2 C
oncentr
atio
n (
vol%
)
Time (hrs)
Gas Inlet
Gas Outlet (Bulk)
Gas Outlet (Centerline)
Center TC
End TC
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Bed Temperatures and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations
Breakthrough - Grade 544 13X
Tem
pe
ratu
re (
oC
)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Cylindrical Breakthrough Test of Candidate Sorbents
2 torr CO2 Equivalent, 16 SLPM N
2
CO
2 C
oncentr
ation (
%)
Time (hr)
Inlet
VSA-10
APGIII
Grade 544 13X
BASF 13X
Grade 522 5A
• CO2 and Water Vapor tests with the Cylindrical Breakthrough Test stand
• The CBT is a lab-scale system (roughly 14 pellet diameters across)
• This means ‘wall channeling’ is a significant contributor to early breakthrough and model-data mismatch
Performance reliability
Thermal Recovery Profiles• Purpose: Determine the required temperature to recover
performance after an off-nominal event (i.e. water saturation during a maintenance operation)
• Tests performed:• Recovery with a 4 hour ‘bakeout’ with a N2 purge at sequentially higher
temperatures. This is not identical to conditions in a 4BMS but is a fair approximation.
• Recovery after a series of simulated CDRA operating cycles.
• Results indicate that 204°C will recover a 13X material to ~95% of peak performance and that a 13X will always outperform a 5A as long as 204°C is achieved.
150 200 250 300 3500
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Adsorption at 0.5%v/v CO2 and 25oC
CO
2 u
pta
ke (
wt%
)
Activation Temperature (oC)
5A zeolite
RK-38
13X zeolites
APG III
BASF 13X
Grade 544
LiLSX zeolite
VSA-10
Plot of Effect of Activation Time & Temperature on CO2 uptake
after Humidity Conditioning for Five Representative Zeolites
150 200 250 300 3502
3
4
5
6
7
8
3.2
4.2
6.2
6.97.1 7.2
7.2
6.8
7.3
4.8
5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.5
5.4
Samples begin
water saturated
CO
2 u
pta
ke (
wt%
)
Activation Temperature (oC)
Grade 544 13X
4-hour Activations
CDRA-like Activations
Reference Capacity
ASRT 2005 5A
4-hour Activations
Reference Capacity
Plot of Effect of Activation Time & Temperature on CO2 uptake
after Humidity Conditioning for Grade 544 13X
Adsorption at 2 torr CO2 and 10oC
Simulated 4BMS Cyclic Performance• Upgrades to the TGA system enabled
testing of the equilibrium conditions found
a 4BMS cycle• Imperfections may have allowed trace water vapor onto
the samples between cycles
• Results support the previous data and
indicate that all three 13X materials can
reliably outperform the benchmark 5A• Regardless of initial state or off-nominal events,
operations with the current temperature of 204°C will
enable better performance than with ASRT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 130
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Adsorption at 2 torr CO2 and 10oC
350oC regen
before first cycle
204oC regen only
CO
2 C
apa
city (
wt%
)
Cycle No.
ASRT 2005
BASF 13X
Grade 544
Grade 544
APG III
Results of simulated 4BMS cycles
Working Capacity for CO2 Removal for Four Zeolites
CO2 capacity
from isotherms
Sorbent Selection
Sorbent Selection• After the 2016 report, the field of CO2 sorbents was downselected to five:
• Grade 522 5A, Grade 544 13X, BASF 13X, APGIII 13X, and VSA-10 LiLSX
• New, Overarching Requirement is “No System Downtime Due to Dust”• Two materials are standout performers: Grade 544 13X and BASF 13X
• Grade 544 13X is selected due to familiarity (successful usage history in desiccant beds)
• Performance Reliability/Recovery Concerns for 13X are Eliminated• No major system changes are needed as the present system will be fault tolerant
• Residual Desiccant Selection is Final Outstanding Selection Point
Desiccant Comparison (preliminary)
Desiccant Comparison (preliminary)• System simulation team uncovered large CO2 removal efficiency hits when the residual
layer of 13X is oversized• Predictions confirmed via full-scale 4BMS-X test data
• Candidate desiccants must maintain an extremely low dew point for substantial time• Cyclic operation is the ultimate test required to compare these materials, but requires dedicated lab capability
• 4 materials for comparison• Simple Breakthrough testing on: Zeolites 13X, 4A, and 3A and an Alumina
• The 3A adsorbs no CO2 but adsorbs water too slowly which allows rapid breakthrough
• The Alumina does not have enough capacity
• 13X and 4A are possible candidates
• 13X is presently used, but it has been shown to cause CO2 hold-up which reduces system efficiency
• Further study is needed to make this decision
• Simulate a 4BMS desiccant bed adsorption
and desorption cycles• Augment a commercial instrument
• Adsorb at conditions similar to 4BMS tests for various
lengths of time
• Achieve desorption cycle by pre-heating a copper coil with
the system’s heating mantle
• Run sequence of cycles of this via software
Desiccant Comparison (preliminary)
Heating Mantle
and CoilSample Column
Acknowledgements• Co-Authors: David Watson, Timothy Giesy, and Lee Miller
• Collaborators at Ames Research Center and in the Materials Test Lab at MSFC
who measured many of the properties reported here.
• Incredible dedication and attention to detail in the work done by NASA and
affiliates.
Backup Slides
Backup Slides
Backup Slides
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
CO2
H2O
Temperature Probes
90 minutes
Desorption Peak
Backup Slides
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
400
500
600
32755.2
Wa
ter
va
po
r (P
a)
Time (min)
SG+13X Outlet
SG Outlet
Inlet
1% BT time
Moisture breakthrough curves:
Silica Gel vs. SG+13X layered bed
Ambient T (oC)
Ambient P (kPa)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
400
500
600
24940.8
Wa
ter
va
po
r (P
a)
Time (min)
SG+4A Outlet
SG Outlet
Inlet
1% BT time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Moisture breakthrough curves:
Silica Gel vs. SG+4A layered bed
Ambient T (oC)
Ambient P (kPa)
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
400
500
600
18566.4
Ambient P (kPa)
Wate
r vapor
(Pa)
Time (min)
SG+3A Outlet
SG Outlet
Inlet
1% BT time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Ambient T (oC)
Moisture breakthrough curves:
Silica Gel vs. SG+3A layered bed
0 200 400 600 8000
100
200
300
400
500
600
14253.5
Wate
r vapor
(Pa)
Time (min)
SG+Alumina Outlet
SG Outlet
Inlet
1% BT time
Moisture breakthrough curves:
Silica Gel vs. SG+Alumina layered bed
Ambient T (oC)
Ambient P (kPa)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Backup Slides
ASRTRK-38
Grade 522
BASF 5A BF
BASF 5A
Zeochem Z5-01
VSA-10
Polymer-IEX
APG-III
BASF 13X BF
BASF 13X
Zeochem Z10-02
Grade 544
0
3
6
9
12
15
Mean Pellet Strength
Dusting Fraction
Dusting Initiation Force
Mean C
rush S
trength
(lb
f)
CO2 Sorbents
CO2 Sorbent Properties: Single Pellet Crush Test
LiLSX
Zeolites
Type-13X Zeolites Type-5A Zeolites
0
15
30
45
Dustin
g F
ractio
n (%
)
ASRTRK-38
Grade 522
BASF 5A
Zeochem Z5-01
VSA-10
Polymer-IEX
APG-III
BASF 13X
Zeochem Z10-02
Grade 544
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
1.2
1.01.1
0.88
0.72
2.5
1.5
1.9
1.41.3
1.5
0.87
0.65 0.69
0.530.43
2.2
1.2
1.5
1.11.0
1.1
LiLSX
Zeolites Type-13X Zeolites
CO2 Capacity at 4 torr, 25
oC
CO2 Capacity at 2 torr, 25
oC
CO
2 C
ap
acity (
mo
l/kg
)
CO2 Sorbents
CO2 Sorbent Properties - CO
2 Capacity
Type-5A Zeolites
Backup Slides
Backup SlidesMaterial Type Sorbent Name Use/Potential Use Form Factor Pore size Notes
Silica Gel Grace Grade 40 Bulk Desiccant Granular Microporous used in CDRA
Silica Gel Grace SG B125 Bulk Desiccant Beads Microporous used in CDRA
Silica Gel BASF Sorbead H Bulk Desiccant Beads Microporous
Silica Gel BASF Sorbead R Bulk Desiccant Beads Microporous
Alumino-Silica Gel BASF Sorbead WS Guard Layer Beads Microporous Misting Stable,
used in CDRA
Activated Alumina BASF F200 Bulk Desiccant Beads Mesoporous Misting Stable
Molecular Sieve UOP ASRT 1995
and ASRT 2005 CO2 sorbent Pellets 5Å
CaA Zeolite,
used in CDRA
Molecular Sieve UOP RK-38 CO2 sorbent Beads 5Å CaA Zeolite,
used in CDRA
Molecular Sieve Grace MS 564 Residual Desiccant Beads 3Å KA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve Grace MS 514 Residual Desiccant Beads 4Å NaA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve UOP UI-94 Residual Desiccant Pellets 4Å NaA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve Grace MS 522 CO2 sorbent Beads 5Å CaA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve Grace MS 544 CO2 sorbent,
Residual Desiccant Beads 10Å
NaX Zeolite,
used in CDRA
Molecular Sieve BASF 5A CO2 sorbent Beads 5Å CaA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve BASF 5A BF CO2 sorbent Binder-free
Beads 5Å CaA Zeolite
Molecular Sieve BASF 13X CO2 sorbent,
Residual Desiccant Beads 10Å NaX Zeolite
Molecular Sieve BASF 13X BF CO2 sorbent Binder-free
Beads 10Å NaX Zeolite
Molecular Sieve UOP APGIII CO2 sorbent Beads 10Å NaX Zeolite
Molecular Sieve UOP VSA-10 CO2 sorbent Beads 10Å LiLSX Zeolite
Molecular Sieve Tosoh NSA-700 CO2 sorbent Pellets 10Å LiLSX Zeolite
Backup Slides